accepted manuscript · depolymerized by hydrolysis in sub- and supercritical water [11]....
TRANSCRIPT
Accepted Manuscript
Title: Chemical recycling of plastics using sub-, supercriticalfluids
Author: Motonobu Goto
PII: S0896-8446(08)00345-8DOI: doi:10.1016/j.supflu.2008.10.011Reference: SUPFLU 1663
To appear in: J. of Supercritical Fluids
Received date: 1-9-2008Revised date: 1-10-2008Accepted date: 1-10-2008
Please cite this article as: M. Goto, Chemical recycling of plastics usingsub-, supercritical fluids, The Journal of Supercritical Fluids (2008),doi:10.1016/j.supflu.2008.10.011
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofbefore it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production processerrors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers thatapply to the journal pertain.
Page 1 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Recovered glass fiber (left) and carbon fiber (right) by the treatment in subcritical benzyl alcohol.
* Graphical Abstract
Page 2 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
1
Chemical recycling of plastics using sub- and supercritical fluids
Motonobu Goto
Bioelectrics Research Center, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8555, Japan
E-mail: [email protected]; Phone: +81-96-342-3664
Abstract
The development of chemical recycling of waste plastics by decomposition reactions in sub- and
supercritical fluids is reviewed. Decomposition reactions proceed rapidly and selectively using
supercritical fluids compared to conventional processes. Condensation polymerization plastics such as
PET, nylon, and polyurethane, are relatively easily depolymerized to their monomers in supercritical
water or alcohols. The monomer components are recovered in high yield. Addition polymerization
plastics such as phenol resin, epoxy resin, and polyethylene, are also decomposed to monomer
components with or without catalysts. Pilot scale or commercial scale plants have been developed and
are operating with sub- and supercritical fluids.
Key-words: Plastics, Depolymerization, Decomposition, Supercritical fluid, Recycling
* Manuscript
Page 3 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
2
1. Introduction
Production of plastics in the world was 168 million tons in 1999, and is estimated to be 210 million
tons in 2010. Since the treatment of plastic wastes has become a serious problem, the development of
more effective recycling processes has been desired. There are three types of recycling for plastic wastes:
material recycling, thermal recycling (energy recovery), and chemical recycling (feedstock recycling).
For the recycling of plastics, chemical recycling is the most desirable process because plastics are
converted to their monomers, which can then be re-used.
Sub- and supercritical fluids such as water and alcohol are excellent reaction media for
depolymerization or decomposition of plastics. By using sub- and supercritical fluids, decomposition of
polymers proceeds rapidly and selectively. Condensation polymerization plastics are relatively easily
depolymerized into their monomers without catalysts in water or alcohol which act as reactant as well as
solvent. Addition polymerization plastics can also be decomposed with or without catalysts in sub- and
supercritical fluids. Composite plastics such as fiber-reinforced plastics are decomposed into smaller
molecular components and fiber materials.
A number of researchers have devoted their time in the development of recycling technology from
the fundamental to the practical scale. Pilot and commercial scale plants have been constructed for
chemical recycling of plastics using sub- and supercritical fluids. In this paper, research and
development on chemical recycling of plastics using sub- and supercritical fluids are reviewed.
2. Condensation polymerization plastics
Condensation polymers with ether, ester, or acid amide linkages can be depolymerized by solvolysis.
The depolymerization reaction may be hydrolysis in water or alcoholysis in alcohol. When solvolysis
proceeds selectively, a polymer can be depolymerized into its monomers. Condensation polymers are
easily decomposed to their monomers by hydrolysis or alcoholysis in near-critical water or alcohol.
Page 4 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
3
Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is a typical condensation polymer abundantly used. Various chemical
recycling methods such as methanolysis in liquid methanol, glycolysis in liquid ethylene glycol, ester
exchange, and hydrolysis using alkali, have been developed.
PET was depolymerized to its monomers, terephthalic acid (TPA) and ethylene glycol (EG), in sub-
and supercritical water [1]. The yield of terephthalic acid was close to 100% under the conditions of 673
K, 40 MPa and a reaction time of 30 min. The yield of ethylene glycol was lower because of further
decomposition catalyzed by the terephthalic acid produced. Yamamoto et al. [2] showed the possibility
of depolymerization of PET in sub- and supercritical water. Secondary products observed were benzoic
acid, diethylene glycol, 1,4-dioxane, acetaldehyde, and crotonic acid.
Sako et al. [3] reported that methanolysis in supercritical methanol produced both monomers,
dimethyl terephthalate (DMT) and EG with almost 100% yield in 30 min without catalyst. De Castro et
al. [4] depolymerized PET in ethanol and ethanol/water under supercritical conditions. PET was
completely depolymerized into monomers in about 5 h at 528 K and the maximum recovery yield of
diethyl terephthalate was 98.5%. We have investigated the reaction mechanism and kinetics of the
depolymerization of PET to its monomers in supercritical methanol [5-8]. As the reaction time was
increased, the molecular weight of the polymer decreased. PET with a weight-average molecular weight
of about 47,000 (polymerization degree: n = 240 to 250) was decomposed to oligomers of 3,000 MW
(polymerization degree: n = 15) in 300 s and to 1,000 MW (polymerization degree: n = 5) in 600 s in
supercritical methanol. After a reaction time of 1200 s, PET decomposed to monomer sized components
and DMT increased gradually.
The reaction scheme of PET decomposition in supercritical methanol is shown in Fig. 1. The main
products in PET depolymerization were DMT and EG. Some amount of methyl 2-hydroxyethyl
terephthalate (MHET), bis-hydroxyethyl terephthalate (BHET), terephthalic acid monomethyl ester
(TAMME), diethylene glycol (DEG) and 2-methoxyethanol (ME) were also detected. TAMME, DEG and
Page 5 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
4
ME may be produced by the following side reactions. Dimerization of EG might produce DEG. ME might
be produced by the reaction of EG and methanol. TAMME might be produced from polymer, oligomer,
or MHET in the presence of water.
PET is degraded by random scission to polymers of smaller MW. It is then continuously
depolymerized to yield MHET, DMT, and EG by end scission. Produced MHET reacts further with
methanol to produce DMT and EG. We have developed a continuous mixture kinetics model to analyze
the depolymerization of PET [5]. The estimated molecular weight distribution (MWD) was compared
with experimental MWD obtained by SEC. The monomer yield changes were also calculated and
compared as a function of reaction time.
To improve the precision of the reaction kinetics model, we further investigated the PET
depolymerization mechanism in supercritical methanol. BHET, which is a compound of terephthalic
acid and two ethylene glycols combined with an ester linkage and is a structural unit of PET, and PET
oligomer (trimer) were used as model compounds for PET. Figure 2 shows the yield of DMT, MHET,
and BHET as a function of reaction time at 543 K and 14.7 MPa. The yield of MHET increased initially
and then decreased. However, the yield of DMT was low at short reaction times, but increased with the
decrease in the yield of MHET. These results suggested the existence of MHET as a reaction intermediate
in PET depolymerization in supercritical methanol. The results also suggested that the depolymerization
of PET would apparently occur in a successful manner.
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., Japan (MHI) has developed a chemical recycling process using
supercritical methanol for depolymerizing post-consumer PET bottles into monomers for use as feed
stocks for manufacturing PET resin [9, 10]. The pilot plant process consists of mainly 4 sections: the PET
bottle shredding section, the depolymerization with supercritical methanol section, the separation and
purification section and the hydrolysis section. In this process, post-consumer PET bottles are recycled
Page 6 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
5
into monomers as pure TPA and EG. MHI recovered high purity monomers whose qualities are
equivalent to those of virgin monomers using this pilot plant.
Nylon 6, which is a polymer synthesized by ring-opening polymerization of ε-caprolactam, was
depolymerized by hydrolysis in sub- and supercritical water [11]. ε-Caprolactam and ε-aminocaproic
acid were detected in the product liquid phase. The total yield of these monomers was about 100% for
reactions at 573 K in 60 min and at 603 K in 30 min. The yield of ε-aminocaproic acid decreased
rapidly as the reaction time increased. Thus, nylon 6 was decomposed by hydrolysis to ε-aminocaproic
acid followed by cyclodehydration to ε-caprolactam or further decomposition to smaller molecules as
shown in Fig. 3. This indicates that the cyclodehydration reaction proceeds in water near the critical
temperature.
Based on the results from nylon 6, 3-aminocaprolactam was synthesized from L-lysine by
cyclodehydration in subcritical water [12]. As the reaction time increased, the reaction product became
a more deeply colored yellow. At higher temperature, a yellow or green colored oil phase was observed.
Lysine was cyclodehydrolyzed to 3-aminocaprolactam and then further decomposed to smaller molecules
in subcritical water. Lysine was completely reacted in 30 min at 633 K. The highest yield of
3-aminocaprolactam was 51% in 20 min at 603 K. For longer reaction times, the yield of
3-aminocaprolactam decreased due to further decomposition. Therefore, sub- and supercritical water were
found to be excellent reaction media for cyclodehydration.
Polycarbonates, one of which is synthesized from bisphenol A and phosgene, are widely used as
commodity plastics and engineering plastics because of features such as temperature resistance, impact
resistance, and optical properties. Several depolymerization processes using alkali catalysts have been
reported to produce bisphenol A. Ikeda et al. [13] studied the decomposition of polycarbonate in water
at 403-573 K. The main products were phenol, bisphenol A, and p-isopropenylphenol. The reaction
was accelerated by the addition of Na2CO3, and the yield of identified products reached 68% in the
Page 7 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
6
reaction at 523 K for 1 h. As shown in Fig. 4, the decomposition mechanism was considered to produce
bisphenol A from polycarbonate initially, then p-isopropenylphenol and phenol were produced from
bisphenol A, and then phenol was produced by the decomposition of various intermediate products. The
presence of p-tert-butylphenol, which was contained in the polycarbonate resin as a molecular weight
adjustment regulator, in the products suggested that it was melted in the decomposition reaction of
polycarbonate. Pinero et al. [14] studied alkali-catalyzed depolymerization of polycarbonate by
alcoholysis in supercritical or near critical conditions to recover bisphenol A and dimethyl carbonate.
The maximum yield of bisphenol A was 90% (kg product/kg PC) at 423 K and 10 MPa using a solution of
methanol and NaOH (10 kg/m3). The yield of dimethyl carbonate, which has an optimum of 35%,
reached values of 8-20%. By using crystallization in water, bisphenol A crystals with a purity of 99.9
wt% were obtained. Pinero-Hernanz et al. [15] applied a shrinking particle model to analyze
nonstationary behavior for alkali-catalyzed methanolysis of polycarbonate. The model successfully
simulated the kinetic behavior of produced monomer components.
Polyurethanes are produced by the reaction of a polyisocyanate with a polyalcohol (polyol) in the
presence of a catalyst and other additives. By hydrolysis of polyurethane in water, it is possible to
obtain polyol and diamine corresponding to the starting isocyanate. Nagase et al. [16] found that the
optimum temperature and pressure were 523-573 K and 10-20 MPa. The decomposition of
polyurethane was almost 100% above the temperature of 543 K. Both polyol and diamine were
recovered almost completely. When the temperature was higher than 603 K, these recoveries decreased.
Dai et al. [17] decomposed polyurethane foam in subcritical water at 423-623 K. The product was a
two-phase liquid where the upper layer was an aqueous solution of tolylenediamine (TDA) and the lower
oil phase was polyol. The highest yield of TDA reached near 90%. Perfect liquid products were
obtained under economic conditions at 523 K for 30 min, and the yield of TDA reached 72%. Dai et al.
[18] also carried out the decomposition of polyol in supercritical water. The main products of
Page 8 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
7
decomposition of poly(propylene glycol) were hydroxyacetone and diols (propylene glycol, dipropylene
glycol, and tripropylene glycol). The yield of hydroxyacetone was 33.0 wt% at 703 K for 10 min and
the total yield of hydroxyacetone and diols was 56.7 wt% at 653 K for 60 min. Kobe Steel developed a
chemical recycling process in Mitsui-Takeda Chemicals in 1997, applying non-catalytic hydrolysis in
subcritical water [19]. Tolylenediisocyanate (TDI) distillation residue, which had been conventionally
incinerated, was successfully converted to TDA. The concept of the recycling process is shown in Fig. 5.
The commercial plant has been operating since 1998 with the capacity of 10 ton/day. The process
consists of a reaction process in subcritical water and a purification process. The recovered TDA was of
high quality with more than 99.5% purity. The expansion of the plant was completed in 2003.
3. Addition polymerization polymers
3.1. Phenol resin
The recycling of thermosetting resins, which are widely used for electronics, is important. Phenol
resin is one of these thermosetting resins and has a high thermal stability because aromatic units are
connected by methylene bonds. Prepolymers of phenol resin were decomposed into their monomers by
reactions at 523-703 K under an Ar atmosphere in sub- and supercritical water [20]. The total yield of
identified products depended on the kind of prepolymers, and the maximum yield reached 78% in the
reaction at 703 K for 0.5 h. The decomposition was accelerated by the addition of Na2CO3, and the yields
of identified monomers reached more than 90%. The molding material from phenol resin was also
decomposed mainly into phenol and cresols in supercritical water. Diphenylmethane was reacted in
supercritical water to confirm the oxygen supply reaction from supercritical water [21]. The production
of benzophenone from diphenylmethane suggested the reaction was supplied with oxygen from
supercritical water. This was confirmed by the reaction in H218O. The molding materials from phenol
resin were decomposed into their monomers by reaction in supercritical water. Addition of
Page 9 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
8
polycarbonate accelerated the decomposition of the molding material.
We applied sub- and supercritical water technology to the chemical recycling of printed circuit board
wastes into chemical resources. The circuit board was used as a reactant after removing the copper
coating. A batch reactor was used to evaluate the conversion and yields of monomers [22]. The reaction
products consisted of liquid, gas, and solid phases. The liquid phase was initially colorless and gradually
turned brown. The solid residue was black and covered by a tar-like material at higher reaction
temperature. The conversion was calculated from the mass of solid residue. In the decomposition in
supercritical water, about 80% of the feed was transformed into liquid phase or gases. About 20%
remained in the solid phase as residue. Higher conversions were obtained for longer reaction times and
at higher temperatures. Even in 20 minutes of the reaction, conversion was more than 60% at 723 K.
Elemental analysis of the feed sample gave the composition as H 6.82%, C 56.0%, and N 2.41%. The
ratios of H to C and N to C in the solid residue were lower than the feed sample. The H/C ratio was lower
at higher reaction temperature and longer reaction time. This indicates that the solid is carbonated in
supercritical water as the reaction proceeds. However, the N/C ratio was close to the feed value for longer
times and at higher temperature. According to GC-MS analysis, phenol, o-cresol, and p-cresol were found
as main components in the liquid phase.
The yield of phenol and cresols was higher at longer reaction time and higher temperature. The yield
reached 5% at 733 K in 80 min. Since the circuit board sample contains about 27.5% in weight of phenol
resin, the yield corresponds to 18% of the phenol resin. The yields of cresols were similar to phenol and
the highest yield was around 3%, which corresponds to 11% of the phenol resin. Therefore, about 30% of
phenol resin part was converted to phenol and cresols under this experimental condition. Total organic
carbon (TOC) was measured for liquid phase products. About 48% of carbon in the feed sample was
converted into small molecules dissolved in the liquid phase. The TOC yield was maximum at 673 K and
the yield at 723 K was lower than that at 673 K. This may be due to the progress of the conversion into
Page 10 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
9
the gas phase.
3.2 Polyethylene
Polyethylene is a thermoplastic commodity used extensively in consumer products and is produced at
a rate of over 60 million tons a year. The distribution of reaction product can be controlled for the
pyrolysis in supercritical water. Watanabe et al. [23] observed that pyrolysis in supercritical water was
different from that in argon. Higher yields of shorter chain hydrocarbons, higher 1-alkene/n-alkane ratio,
and higher conversion were obtained in supercritical water. The difference was explained by the
difference in the reaction phase. The enhancement of polyethylene decomposition by supercritical water
was believed to be due to dissolution of high molecular weight hydrocarbons into supercritical water and
diffusion of water into the molten polyethylene phase.
Moriya and Enomoto [24] compared polyethylene cracking in supercritical water with water-free
thermal cracking. The product from supercritical water cracking (698 K, 120 min) was a yellow-brown
grease. Oil conversion was 90.2 wt% and gas conversion was 6.5 wt%. The product from thermal
cracking was a blackish-brown liquid and oil was 71.8 wt% and gas was 12.0 wt%. The yield of oil
products for supercritical water was high and coke production was small compared to thermal cracking.
The main products were secondary alcohols of 2-propanol and 2-butanol, and ketones of 2-propanone and
2-butanone. Polyethylene was converted into 2-propanol and then oxidized into 2-propanone. This
suggests that the liberated hydrogen was donated to supercritical water and participated in polyethylene
cracking. From an experiment using D2O as a tracer, Moriya and Enomoto [24] showed that hydrogen
in supercritical water was captured into the product oil and the donation of hydrogen from the
supercritical water to the oil increased with a higher water fill rate for the reactor volume.
4 Fiber reinforced plastics
Page 11 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
10
Fiber reinforced plastics (FRP) have been widely used as a high strength material in recent years.
FRP is used in various industries such as petrochemistry, construction, automobiles, aircraft and
environmental businesses because of its heat-resistance, anti-corrosion properties, and mechanical
strength. Glass fiber containing FRP is called GFRP and carbon fiber containing FRP is called CFRP.
GFRP is a composite material manufactured by laminating unsaturated polyester resin with glass fiber
and filler. CFRP usually consists of carbon fiber and epoxy resin. It is known that the FRP is one of the
most difficult materials to fractionate into elemental components, namely fiber, filler and polymers,
unfortunately resulting in the incineration or landfill of used FRP materials without any attempt at
recycling.
Sugeta et al. [26] and Okajima et al. [27] studied the decomposition of FRP in sub- and supercritical
water using a batch-type reactor. FRP was almost completely decomposed at 653 K in 5 min.
Kamimura et al. [28] treated FRP containing glass fiber in supercritical methanol in the presence of a
catalytic amount of N, N-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP). As a preliminary experiment, unsaturated
polyesters were almost completely decomposed in supercritical methanol. At the optimized condition of
548 K, 10 MPa and 5 h, the products were a MeOH-soluble oil (60%), a CHCl3-soluble solid (39%), and
residue (1%). Supercritical ethanol gave similar results. The results for roughly ground waste FRP in
methanol at 548 K, 11 MPa, and 6 h were a MeOH-soluble oil (28.2%), a CHCl3-soluble solid (16.2%),
and a residue (62.6%). Since the residue contained less than 3% of organics, the organic polymer phase
was almost completely decomposed. The rate and efficiency of the degradation depended on the amount
of DMAP.
Pinero-Hernanz et al. [29] used supercritical water to decompose epoxy resin containing carbon fiber.
The efficiency of resin removal reached 79.3 wt% at 673 K and 28 MPa with further improvement
through the use of potassium hydroxide as an alkali catalyst (up to 95.3 wt%). The tensile strength of the
reclaimed fibers was 90-98% of the virgin fibers. The overall rate of the degradation process was
Page 12 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
11
controlled by both surface reaction and mass transfer steps. Pinero-Hernanz et al. [30] used sub- and
supercritical alcohols to treat CFRP. Methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, and acetone were employed in
batch and semi-continuous-type reactors at temperatures ranging from 473 to 723 K. Using a flow system
and an alkali catalyst improved the degradation process. Experiments performed in the semi-continuous
flow system enhanced the mass transfer steps and reduced temperature requirements. Elimination of
resin up to 98 wt% was achieved using at 623 K and 1.1 kg-alcohol/kg-fiber/min at the same solvent flow
rate at 548 K using 0.02 mol/L of KOH, 96.5 wt% was obtained.
Fukuzawa et al. [31, 32] of Hitachi Chemicals Ltd., Japan investigated the dissolution process of the
resin part of FRP by a process called “ambient pressure dissolving method” using various solvents with or
without catalysts in order to develop a recycling technology for FRP. They reported the influence of
catalyst and solvent on the depolymerization of FRP. The highest conversion was observed when K3PO4
was used as a catalyst and diethyleneglycol monomethylether (DGMM) as a solvent. The second highest
conversion was observed for benzyl alcohol (BZA).
We have extended the operation temperature under pressures higher than the vapor pressure [33].
Reactions were carried out with or without a catalyst (K3PO4) in DGMM and BZA under their subcritical
states at temperatures ranging from 463 - 623 K for 1 - 8 h in a batch reactor. The conversion of UP was
fast as the catalyst/solvent molar ratio increased and it was enhanced in the presence of K3PO4 catalyst in
subcritical BZA. The glass fiber recovered after the FRP treatment in subcritical BZA was relatively long,
while it became shorter and somewhat damaged at temperatures higher than 573 K. A similar trend was
observed when DGMM was used as a solvent. Carbon fiber was also recovered successfully by the
treatment in BZA with K3PO4. Figure 6 shows the fibers recovered by the treatment in BZA.
Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd., Japan has been developing FRP recycling technology using
hydrolysis in subcritical water since 2002 [34]. By their technology, thermosetting resin in FRP can be
recycled into basic materials with a material recycling rate of 70%. The concept of their subcritical
Page 13 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
12
water recycling process is shown in Fig. 7. After subcritical water hydrolysis of FRP, the resin was
dissolved into a reaction liquid. The UP components recovered, such as glycols and fumaric acid, were
separated from the aqueous reaction liquid and polymerized into polyester with new raw resin materials to
produce recycled UP resin. Styrene-fumaric acid copolymer (SFC) obtained in the aqueous phase was
also separated. The SFC has the potential to be a raw material for synthetic functional polymers,
because the molecular structure is similar to that of a commercial low-profile additive (LPA) for FRP
forming. Thus, the SFC can be recycled to LPA after modifying its carboxylic acid group to develop the
shrinkage control effect. A bench plat with a capacity of 40 kg FRP per operation has been developed
for the subcritical water hydrolysis at 503 K and 2.8 MPa. Inorganic materials are separated by a filter
press. The recovered inorganic materials are used as inorganic filler to produce FRP. A pilot plant with
a reactor capacity of 2.9 m3 was constructed in Tochigi, Japan.
5. Crosslinked polyethylene
Crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) is a thermosetting resin which is difficult to recycle because of its
low fluidity and low moldability caused by crosslinking. XPLE is classified into three types based on the
cross-linking: peroxide-crosslinked polyethylene, radiation-crosslinked polyethylene, and
silane-crosslinked polyethylene [35]. If only the cross-linking points are decomposed in XLPE, the
polymer can be effectively recycled, which does not require decomposition into smaller molecules.
Since selective decrosslinking at crosslinking points is difficult in conventional processes, XLPE is
usually converted into oil by thermal and catalytic cracking. Watanabe et al. [36] observed that the
peroxide-crosslinked polyethylene was selectively decrosslinked without severe decomposition of
backbone chains by using supercritical water.
Material recycling of the insulation of crosslinked polyethylene cable was investigated by Hitachi
Cable Ltd., Japan [37-39]. A crosslinking element that consists of a siloxane bond in silane-crosslinked
Page 14 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
13
polyethylene (silane-XLPE) was selectively decomposed in supercritical alcohol or water. Gel fractions
characterizing the crosslinking density decreased with increases in reaction temperature and vanished
over 573 K in supercritical methanol as shown in Fig. 8. In water, a temperature over 643 K was
necessary to reduce the gel fraction to 0 wt%. The molecular weight started to decrease over 613 K in
water and methanol. In water, the molecular weight of the product was lower than that in methanol.
Therefore, the crosslinking element was completely decomposed without reduction of the molecular
weight for the reaction at 573-613 K in methanol. Supercritical methanol achieved selective
decomposition at crosslinking points, while supercritical water was less selective. The mechanical and
electrical properties of recycled polyethylene satisfied the requirement of the cable insulation. A
pilot-scale continuous process consisting of a reactor extruder (Ext-Chem) and a degasser extruder
(Ext-Degas) was developed. The process is divided into four sections: feeding, reactor, degasser, and
pelletization. Alcohol was fed by a high-pressure pump and heated to the supercritical state before it was
injected into the cylinder. A tube reactor was attached to the Ext-Chem to keep the state for 30 min.
Ext-Degas was mounted to the outlet of the mixture of polymer and alcohol gas to separate recycled
polyethylene and the gas. The recycled polyethylene was extruded as strands from the Ext-Degas. The
apparent viscosity of recycled polyethylene was close to that of raw polyethylene.
Hong et al. [40] studied decrosslinking of polyethylene in supercritical methanol. They confirmed
that the molecular weight of decrosslinked polyethylene was only slightly smaller than that of raw
polyethylene. The reaction temperature and gel content were dominant parameters affecting the rate of
the decrosslinking reaction.
6. The role of solvents
As described above, water and alcohols were mainly used as sub- and supercritical fluids in
depolymerization processes of plastics. In most of the case, role of sub- and supercritical fluids is both
Page 15 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
14
solvent as a reaction medium and reactant. In hydrolysis or alcoholysis reaction of condensation
polymerization plastics, water or alcohol is evidently one of the reactants and transformed into the
product molecules. In depolymerization of polyethylene, hydrogen was supplied from water [24], so
that, the role of water is not only a solvent but also a reactant.
The critical temperature of methanol is much lower than that of water. Properties of water such as
dielectric constant and ion product, change drastically around the critical point. Thus, catalytic effect of
water can be expected. When the depolymerized products are not enough stable in high temperature
solvent and supercritical condition is required, alcohols may be better solvent than water due to lower
critical temperature. During the depolymerization process, plastics phase is often solid or melt state.
In that case, dissolution of solvent into solid or melt phase is important to enhance the reaction, especially
initial stage of the depolymerization.
When we think of whole process of chemical recycling of plastics, separation and purification
process of depolymerization products is also important. Thus, we have to select the solvent which can
be efficiently used for separation and purification process as well as reaction process.
6. Conclusion
Reactions in sub- and supercritical fluids can be used to depolymerize spent plastics for the chemical
recycling process. Condensation polymerization polymers such as PET were monomerized by
solvolysis in supercritical water or alcohol. Addition polymerization polymers such as phenol resin
were also decomposed in sub- and supercritical fluids. For fiber reinforced plastics, fibers and chemicals
were recovered. Supercritical fluid was used for decrosslinking to recycle crosslinked polyethylene
without depolymerization of the polymers. Pilot to commercial scale plants have been constructed in
Japan for the chemical recycling of various plastics.
Page 16 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
15
References
[1] S. Saito (Ed.), Science and Technology of Supercritical Fluids, Sankyo Business, Tokyo (1996)
[2] S. Yamamoto, M. Aoki, M. Yamagata: Recovery of monomers from poly(ethylene terephthalate) by
hydrolysis under pressure. R-D Kobe Steel Engineering Reports, 46 (1996) 60-63
[3] T. Sako, T. Sugeta, K. Otake, N. Nakazawa, M. Sato, K. Namiki, M. Tsugumi: Depolymerization of
polyethylene terephthalate to monomers with supercritical methanol. J. Chem. Eng. Japan, 30 (1997)
342-346
[4] R. E. N. de Castro, G. J. Vidotti, A. F. Rubira, E. C. Muniz: Depolymerization of poly(ethylene
terephthalate) wastes using ethanol and ethanol/water in supercritical conditions. J. Appl. Poly. Sci., 101
(2006) 2009-2016
[5] M. Goto, H. Koyamoto, A. Kodama, T. Hirose, S. Nagaoka, B. J. McCoy: Degradation kinetics of
poly(ethylene terephthalate) in supercritical methanol. AIChE J., 48 (2002) 136-141
[6] M. Goto, H. Koyamoto, A. Kodama, T. Hirose, and S. Nagaoka: Depolymerization of polyethylene
terephthalate in supercritical methanol. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 14 (2002) 11427-11430
[7] M. Genta, T. Iwaya, M. Sasaki, M. Goto, T. Hirose: Depolymerization mechanism of poly(ethylene
terephthalate) in supercritical methanol. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44 (2005) 3894-3900
[8] M. Genta, T. Iwaya, M. Sasaki, M., Goto: Supercritical methanol for polyethylene terephthalate
depolymerization: Observation using simulator. Waste Management 27 (2007) 1167-1177
[9] M. Genta, F. Yano, Y. Kondo, W. Matsubara, S. Oomoto: Development of chemical recycling process
for post-consumer PET bottle by methanolysis in supercritical methanol. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries,
Ltd. Technical Review, 40 (2003) 1-4
[10] M. Genta, R. Uehara, F. Yano, Y. Kondo, W. Matsubara, Development of chemical recycling process
for post-consumer PET bottle by methanolysis in supercritical methanol. Proc. 6th Int. Symp.
Supercritical Fluids (2003) 1381-1386
Page 17 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
16
[11] M. Goto, M. Umeda, A. Kodama, T. Hirose, S. Nagaoka: Monomerization of nylon 6 in sub-and
supercritical water. Kobunshi Ronbunshu, 58, (2001) 548-551
[12] M. Goto, M. Umeda, A. Kodama, T. Hirose, S. Nagaoka, S. Matsuda, S. Masuhara, J. Hiraki:
Synthesis of 2-amino-ε-caprolactam by cyclodehydration of lysine in subcritical water. J. Chem. Eng.
Japan, 37 (2004) 353-356
[13] A. Ikeda, K. Katoh, H. Tagaya: Monomer recovery of waste plastics by liquid phase decomposition
and polymer synthesis. J. Materials Science 43 (2008) 2437-2441
[14] R. Pinero, J. Garcia, M. J. Cocero: Chemical recycling of polycarbonate in a semi-continuous
lab-plant. A green route with methanol and methanol-water mixtures. Green Chem., 7 (2005) 380-387
[15] R. Pinero-Hernanz, J. Garcia-Serna, M. J. Cocero: Nonstationary model of the semicontinuous
depolymerization of polycarbonate. AIChE J., 52 (2006) 4186-4199
[16] Y. Nagase, M. Yamagata, T. Matsuda, T. Naito, K. Kodama, R. Fukuzato: Chemical recycling process
for scrap polyurethane plastics using supercritical water. Proc. 5th Meeting on Supercritical Fluids, (1998)
127-132
[17] Z. Dai, B. Hatano, J. Kadokawa, H. Tagaya: Effect of diaminotoluene on the decomposition of
polyurethane foam waste in superheated water. PolymDegrad. Stab. 76 (2002) 179-184
[18] Z. Dai, B. Hatano, H. Tagaya: Decomposition of a polyol in supercritical water. Polym. Degrad. Stab.,
80 (2003) 353-356
[19] R. Fukuzato: Current status of supercritical fluid technology in the East Asia. Proc. 6th Int. Symp.
Supercritical Fluids, Tome 1 (2003) 1-10
[20] Y. Suzuki, H. Tagaya, T. Asou, J. Kadokawa, K. Chiba: Decomposition of prepolymers and molding
materials of phenol resin in subcritical and supercritical water under an Ar atmosphere. Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res., 38 (1999) 1391-1395
[21] H. Tagaya, Y. Suzuki, T. Asou, J. Kadokawa, K. Chiba: Reaction of model compounds of phenol
Page 18 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
17
resin and molding materials of phenol resin in supercritical water for chemical recycling of polymer waste.
Chem. Lett. (1998) 937-938
[22] M. Goto, M. Kitamura, T. Hirose, K. Shibata: Depolymerization of printed circuit board in
near-critical water. Hydrothermal Reactions and Techniques, World Scientific, New Jersey (2003)
201-208
[23] M. Watanabe, T. Adschiri, K. Arai: Polyethylene decomposition via pyrolysis and partial oxidation in
supercritical water. Kobunshi Ronbunshu, 58 (2001) 631-641
[24] T. Moriya, H. Enomoto: Characteristics of polyethylene cracking in supercritical water compared to
thermal cracking. Polym. Degrad. Stab., 65 (1999) 373-386
[25] T. Moriya, H. Enomoto: Conversion of polyethylene to oil using supercritical water and donation of
hydrogen in supercritical water. Kobunshi Ronbunshu, 58 (2001) 661-673
[26] T. Sugeta, S. Nagaoka, K. Otake, T. Sako: Decompositon of fiber reinforced plastics using fluid at
high temperature and pressure. Kobunshi Ronbunshu, 58 (2001) 557-563
[27] I. Okajima, K. Yamada, T. Sugeta, T. Sako: Decomposition of epoxy resin and recycling of CFRP
with sub- and supercritical water. Kagaku Kogaku Ronbunshu, 28 (2002) 553-558
[28] A. Kamimura, K. Yamada, T. Kuratani, Y. Taguchi, F. Tomonaga: Effective depolymerization waste
FRPs by treatment with DMAP and supercritical alcohol. Chem. Lett., 35 (2006) 586-587
[29] R. Pinero-Hernanz, C. Dodds, J. Hyde, J. Garcia-Serna, M. Poliakoff, E. Lester, M. J. Cocero, S.
Kingman, S. Pickering, K. H. Wong: Chemical recycling of carbon fibre reinforced composites in
nearcritical and supercritical water. Composites: Part A 39 (2008) 454-461
[30] R. Pinero-Hernanz, J. Garcia-Serna, C. Dodds, J. Hyde, M. Poliakoff, M. J. Cocero, S. Kingman, S.
Pickering, E. Lester: Chemical recycling of carbon fibre composites using alcohols under subcritical and
supercritical conditions. J. Supercritical Fluids, 46 (2008) 83-92
[31] H. Fukuzawa, K. Shibata, H. Izawa, Proc. 13th conference of the Japan Society of Waste
Page 19 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
18
Management Experts, (2002) I: 428
[32] H. Fukuzawa, K. Shibata, H. Izawa, A. Matsuo, Proc. Int. Symp. Feedstock Recycling 2002 (2002)
A30
[33] T. Iwaya, S, Tokuno, M. Sasaki, M. Goto, K. Shibata: Recycling of fiber reinforced plastics using
depolymerization by solvothermal reaction with catalyst. J. Mat. Sci. 43 (2008) 2452-2456
[34] T. Nakagawa: FRP recycling technology using sub-critical water hydrolysis. JEC Composites
Magazine, March-April (2008) 40-43
[35] S. Venkatraman, L. Kleiner: Properties of three types of cross-linked polyethylene. Adv. Polym.
Tech., 9 (1989) 265-270
[36] S. Watanabe, K. Komura, S. Nagaya, H. Morita, T. Nakamoto, S. Hirai, F. Aida: Development of
cross-linked polymer material recycling technology by supercritical water. Proc. Int. Conf. Properties and
Applications of Dielectric Materials, 7 (2003) 595-598
[37] T. Goto, T. Yamazaki: Recycling of silane-cross-linked polyethylene for insulation of cables using
supercritical alcohols. Hitachi Cable Review, 23 (2004) 24-27
[38] T. Goto, S. Ashihara, T. Yamazaki, K. Watanabe: Evaluation of recycling technology of insulation of
cross-linked polyethylene insulated cable using supercritical alcohol. IEEJ Trans. PE, 126 (2006) 400-406
[39] T. Goto, T. Yamazaki, T. Sugeta, I. Okajima, T. Sako: Selective decomposition of the siloxane bond
constituting the crosslinking element of silane-crosslinked polyethylene by supercritical alcohol. J. Appl.
Polym. Sci., 109 (2008) 144-151
[40] S. M. Hong, H. K. Cho, C. M. Koo, J. H. Lee, W. Y. Park, H. S. Lee, Y. W. Lee: Decross-linking of
cross-linked polyethylene using supercritical methanol. Korean Chem. Eng. Res. 46 (2008) 63-68
Page 20 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
19
List of figure captions
Figure 1 Reaction scheme for decomposition of PET in methanol
Figure 2 Relationship between the yields of products and the reaction time in decomposition of PET
Figure 3 Decomposition of nylon 6 in subcritical water
Figure 4 Decomposition reaction of polycarbonate.
Figure 5 The concept of chemical recycling of TDI to TDA
Figure 6 Recovered glass fiber (left) and carbon fiber (right) from treatment in BZA.
Figure 7 A concept of FRP recycling developed at Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd.
Figure 8 Gel fraction and molecular weight of the reaction products from silane-XLPE by sub- and
supercritical water or methanol
Page 21 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
20
Figure 1 Reaction scheme for decomposition of PET in methanol
PET
Oligomer
MHET
DMT EG TAMME
DEG OH2 ME
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH OH2
C241
O
O
C244
O
OH CH3
OH CH2CH
2OH
C258
O
O
C261
O
OCH3
CH3
C282
O
O
C285
O
CH2CH
2O
C300
O
O
C303
O
O CH2CH
2OHCH
3MHET
DMT
TAMME
EG
ME
DEG
OH CH2CH
2O CH
3
OH CH2CH
2O CH
2CH
2OH
+ +
+ +
PETn
k2
k1
k4
k5 k6
k3
k7k8
Page 22 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
21
Figure.2 Relationship between the yields of products
and the reaction time in decomposition of
PET
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70Reaction time (min)
Yie
ld (
% )
DMT
MHET
BHET
Page 23 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
22
NH
O
NH(CH2)5CO n
NH2(CH
2)5COOH
Secondary products
Nylon 6
-aminocaproic acid
-caprolactam
Fig. 3 Decomposition of nylon 6 in subcritical water.
Page 24 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
23
Fig. 4 Decomposition reaction of polycarbonate.
Page 25 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
24
Fig. 5 The concept of chemical recycling of TDI to TDA
Page 26 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
25
Fig. 6 Recovered glass fiber (left) and carbon fiber (right) from the treatment in BZA.
Page 27 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
26
Fig. 7 A concept of FRP recycling developed at Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd.
Page 28 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
27
Fig. 8 Gel fraction and molecular weight of the reaction products from silane-XLPE by sub-
and supercritical water or methanol
Page 29 of 29
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
28
Table 1. Critical parameters of water and alcohols
Critical temperature [K] Critical pressure [MPa]
Water 647.10 22.064
Methanol 512.64 8.097
Ethanol 513.92 6.148
1-Propanol 536.78 5.175
Acetone 508.10 4.700
Benzyl alcohol 715.00 4.300