acca f4 cases summary

Upload: faranjamal

Post on 14-Apr-2018

232 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 ACCA F4 Cases Summary

    1/8

    ACCA F4

    A selection of popular cases

    CONTRACT

    Offer and acceptance

    Case Reminder Point of law

    Partridge v Crittenden Advert selling wild birds Advert is an ITT not an offer

    Carlill v Carbolic Smoke

    Ball Co

    Newspaper ad Use smoke ball,

    catch flu, get 100

    Advert may be on offer to the

    world (rarely)

    Fisher v Bell Flick knife in shop window Shop display an ITT not an offer.

    Pharmaceutical Society

    of GB v Boots

    Medicines on shop shelves Display is an ITT. Point of sale is

    at counter

    Harvey v Facey Lowest price for Bumper Hall Pen

    900

    Supply of information re selling

    price is not an offer

    Harris v Nickerson Auction cancelled sued for

    expenses

    Advert re auction was ITT to an

    offer hence no contract

    Errington v Errington Father bought house for couple.

    Promised to transfer if they

    paid mortgage. Widow

    refused

    Unilateral offer could not be

    revoked while

    consideration was

    executory

    Hyde v Wrench Sale of farm buyer tried to get

    price reduction

    Counter offer revokes original offer

    Felthouse v Bindley Trying to buy a horse. Assume its

    mine if I dont hear from

    you

    Silence cannot be acceptance

    Entores v Miles Far

    Eastern

    Acceptance faxed from Amsterdam

    to London

    Valid when received and read in

    London

    Byrne v Van Tienhoven Acceptance and revocation letters

    crossing in post

    Revocation of offer only effective

    when received and read.

    Acceptance valid when

    posted.

  • 7/30/2019 ACCA F4 Cases Summary

    2/8

    Consideration

    Case Reminder Point of law

    Re McArdle Tenant decorating house Past consideration is no good

    Collins v Godefroy Witness promised money to give

    evidence already

    subpoenad

    No consideration promise was

    already legal obligation

    Glasbrook Brothers v

    Glamorgan CC

    Police requested to subdue

    picketing strikers

    Police had done more than normal

    obligation consideration

    was supplied

    Stilk v Myrick Sailors mutinied others offered a

    rise to stay

    No consideration rise was not

    enforceable

    Hartley v Ponsonby More sailors mutinied others

    offered a rise to stay

    Extra duties were consideration

    rise was enforceable

    Williams v Roffey

    Brothers

    Sub-contractor offered a bonus to

    finish on time

    Avoidance of penalty for the main

    contractor was

    consideration for the bonus

    Foakes v Beer Lender agreed delayed repayment

    schedule with no interest

    No consideration for variation of

    contract. Interest was due

    Central London Property

    Trust v High

    Trees House

    Landlord offered to reduce rent on

    high rise flats in WW2

    Promissory estoppel. Variation

    freely offered with no

    coercion could not go

    back on offer

    Intention

    Balfour v Balfour Husband went to Ceylon

    promised to support wife

    Domestic agreement presumed no

    intention to create legal

    relations

    Jones v Vernon Pools Contract binding in honour only Presumption in commercialcontracts is that legal

    relations are intended but

    it can be rebutted.

  • 7/30/2019 ACCA F4 Cases Summary

    3/8

    Contract terms and exclusion clauses

    Poussard v Spiers &

    Pond

    Opera singer ill at start of run.

    Producers put in

    replacement

    Failing to attend was breach of

    condition gave right to

    rescind

    Bettini v Gye Opera singer 3 days late for

    rehearsals

    Attendance at all rehearsals was a

    warranty breach gives

    right to damages, not

    rescission

    Curtis v Chemical

    Cleaning Co

    Employee said exclusion clause

    only applied to beads and

    sequins

    Misrepresentation rendered the

    exclusion invalid

    Thompson v LMS

    Railway

    Rail ticket referred to standard

    conditions. They excluded

    liability for everything.Train too long for platform

    woman fell off

    Exclusion clause was adequately

    communicated

    Olley v Marlborough

    Court

    Notice in hotel bedroom denied

    liability for loss

    Not effective communicated after

    contract was made

    Photo Productions v

    Securicor

    Securicor night watchman set fire to

    building

    Exclusion clause was effective

    Misrepresentation

    Leaf v International

    Gallery

    Sale of fake Constable Mistake was not operative.

    Misrepresentation was

    innocent so rescission was

    only possible remedy. Sale

    was 5 years ago too late

    delay defeats equity

    Performance

    Cutter v Powell Sailor died part way into journey.Captain refused to pay

    wages

    No wages due part performance isno good

    Sumpter v Hedges House part built. Builder went bust.

    Asked for quantum meruit

    No amount payable for building.

    Acceptance could not be

    freely given.

    Hoenig v Isaacs House refurb largely completed but

    not exactly to spec.

    Homeowner refused to pay

    Had to pay as performance

    substantially completed.

    Could deduct cost to finish

    to spec

  • 7/30/2019 ACCA F4 Cases Summary

    4/8

    Discharge by breach

    Sumpter v Hedges Builder half built house. Asked for

    part of price

    No quantum meruit as customer

    had no choice about

    accepting

    Hochster v de la Tour Tour courier cancelled trip well in

    advance.

    Immediate action for anticipatory

    breach was allowed

    White and Carter

    (Councils) v

    McGregor

    Names on bins. Client cancelled

    order before work done

    Injured party can carry on

    regardless and sue for full

    price

    Avery v Bowden Shipping contract cancelled in

    advance. Wronged party

    opted to continue and sue

    for full price. War broke

    out

    War frustrated contract. Lost right

    to sue

    Omnium DEnterprise v

    Sutherland

    Ship chartered out then sold before

    start of charter

    Anticipatory breach - not

    frustration. The events

    were avoidable by the

    owner

    Remedies for breach of contract

    Case Reminder Point of law

    Hadley v Baxendale Broken mill shaft. Delay in fixinglead to great loss of

    business

    Remoteness of damage notforeseeable couldnt sue.

    Victoria Laundry v

    Newman

    Industries

    Delay in completing contract led to

    huge cost from lost

    business

    Only liable for reasonably

    foreseeable damages

    Chaplin v Hicks Beauty contestant wrongly

    excluded from contest

    Difficult to assess damages but

    plaintiff still entitled

    Cellulose Acetate Silk vWidnes Foundry

    Loss much bigger than contractallowed for

    Damages fixed at level proscribedin contract.

    Ford Motor Co v

    Armstrong

    Contract proscribed fixed damages

    for trivial breaches

    Penalty clauses not upheld. Only

    sue for actual loss

    Jarvis v Swan Tours Holiday not as good as described in

    brochure

    Could sue for disappointment and

    distress

    Warner Bros v Nelson Contract stopped Bette Davis

    working for other film

    companies

    Injunction illustration

  • 7/30/2019 ACCA F4 Cases Summary

    5/8

    AGENCY

    Watteau v Fenwick Pub manager ordered cigars despite

    specific orders not to. Pubowner refused to pay

    Implied agency. Owner bound on

    contract.

    GNR v Swaffield Lonely, unaccompanied horse in

    station. GNR arranged

    stabling. Owner refused to

    pay

    Agency by necessity. Owner had to

    pay.

    Kelner v Baxter Promoters bought wine on behalf

    of company not yet

    formed.

    Company not liable on contract as

    did not exist when contract

    made. Promoters personally

    liable

    Yonge v Toynbee Solicitors acted for client who had

    gone insane.

    Insanity ended agency. Solicitors

    liable for breach of warranty

    of authority.

  • 7/30/2019 ACCA F4 Cases Summary

    6/8

    TORT

    Donoghue v Stevenson Decomposed snail in ginger beer.

    Great upset after drinking

    Duty of care despite no contract.

    Case established

    negligence.

    Bourhill v Young Woman heard crash looked out at

    messy accident -

    miscarried

    No duty of care; too remote.

    Hedley Byrne v Heller Ad agency gets positive reference

    from banker of potential

    client. Client then goes

    bust owing money

    Negligent mis-statement. Liable if

    reasonably expect others to

    rely on your statement

    Caparo Inds v Dickman Caparo took over Fidelity relying

    on info in audited accounts.These turned out to be in

    error

    Auditors normally only liable to

    those to whom their opinion is directly

    communicated.

    Haley v LEB Blind person falling down marked

    hole in road

    LEB negligent. Must take into

    account potential

    susceptibility.

    Watt v Herts CC Fireman injured while dashing off

    to blaze.

    Less care required if urgent

    objective. Authority not

    liable

    Paris v Stepney BC One eyed mechanic no goggles

    supplied. Blinded by freakshard.

    Employer liable. More care

    required given potentialseriousness

    Bolton v Stone Freak cricket shot hit ball out of

    ground injuring passer by.

    Club not liable. Highly unlikely

    accident.

    ADT v Binder Hamlyn Partner gave verbal assurance to

    buyer that accounts were

    OK. Bought and lost

    money.

    Firm liable for negligent mis-

    statement due to direct

    comment.

    ICI v Shatwell Explosive brothers. Willingly

    playing with explosives

    blown up

    Volenti non fit injuria. Employer

    not liable.

  • 7/30/2019 ACCA F4 Cases Summary

    7/8

    EMPLOYMENT

    Pepper v Hart Teacher sent child to school at

    reduced fee. Revenue tried

    to assess benefit at average

    cost

    Cost in legislation interpreted as

    average cost. House of

    Lords used Hansard to help

    Hall v Lorimer Vision mixer worked for many

    employers for short time

    Self employed

    COMPANY

    Salomon v Salomon Company financed by owner

    mainly by secured debt.

    Company insolvent. Ownerclaimed security

    Allowed. Company separate legal

    person. Shareholder could

    also be secured creditor

    DHN Food Distributors

    v Tower

    Hamlets

    Group company traded from

    premises owned by other

    group company.

    Compulsorily demolished

    Compensation payable both for

    building and loss of trade.

    Whole group viewed as

    owner

    Gilford Motor Co v

    Horne

    Mechanics contract banned

    approaches to old

    customers after leaving job.

    Wrote out from newlimited company instead

    Not allowed. Company a sham

    merely to avoid contract

    obligation

    Daimler v Continental

    Tyre and Rubber

    1916 contract between 2 British

    companies one with

    German shareholders.

    English company withdrew

    No breach. Veil lifted to reveal other

    company as enemy

    Ebrahimi v Westbourne

    Galleries

    2 shareholders (60%) expelled

    other shareholder as

    director

    Court agreed just and equitable

    winding up as quasi

    partnership

    Hickman v KentSheepbreeders Articles said disputes must go toarbitration. Shareholder

    sued company over dispute

    Articles binding on shareholder. Hadto go to arbitration

    Pender v Lushington Articles allowed 1 vote per share

    up to max of 100. Large

    holder passed some shares

    to nominee. Chairman

    wouldnt count votes

    Articles binding on company. Had to

    count votes

    Rayfield v Hands Articles said that selling

    shareholders must offer to

    directors who would buy atfair price.

    Articles binding shareholder v

    shareholder. Directors

    obliged to buy

  • 7/30/2019 ACCA F4 Cases Summary

    8/8

    Eley v Positive Life Articles said Eley Co solicitor for

    life. Sacked. Sued for

    breach

    Articles dont make contracts

    between company and 3rd

    party. Could not sue

    Re New British Iron Articles stated directors to be paid1,000pa. Not paid

    Articles can be used to flesh outexisting contract. 1,000

    binding

    Dafen Tinplate v Llanelli

    Steel

    Proposed change of articles to

    allow directors to buy out

    any shareholder

    Not allowed. Not for benefit for

    company as whole

    Sidebottom v Kershaw

    Leese

    Proposed change of articles to

    allow directors to buy out

    any shareholder competing

    with co

    Allowed. Although bad for 1

    shareholder, would benefit

    co as a whole

    Bushell v Faith 3 equal shareholder / directors.

    Articles said attacked

    director got treble votes. 2

    tried to sack 3rd

    Couldnt sack him. Any vote would

    fail 2:3

    Freeman & Lockyer v

    Buckhurst Park

    Director described himself as MD.

    Made contract. Co refused

    to pay.

    Director held out as MD has

    apparent authority to bind

    co. Co must pay.

    Panorama Developments

    v Fidelis

    Furnishings

    Co secretary hired cars claiming for

    co use. Used them

    personally. Co refused to

    pay

    Secretary has apparent authority to

    bind co in admin contracts.

    Co had to pay.

    Dorchester Finance v

    Stebbing

    Experienced accountant / director

    signed blank cheques.

    Colleague stole large sum.

    Liable for breach of duty to use

    skill and care. Accountant

    should have known better.

    Percival v Wright Shareholder selling. Directors

    bought knowing share

    price would rise soon

    Directors OK. Duty owed to co as

    whole not to individual

    shareholders

    Foss v Harbottle Minority shareholders bringingaction against director /

    majority shareholder who

    defrauded co

    They failed. If wrong is done to aco, the proper plaintiff is

    the co