acca f4 cases summary
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 ACCA F4 Cases Summary
1/8
ACCA F4
A selection of popular cases
CONTRACT
Offer and acceptance
Case Reminder Point of law
Partridge v Crittenden Advert selling wild birds Advert is an ITT not an offer
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke
Ball Co
Newspaper ad Use smoke ball,
catch flu, get 100
Advert may be on offer to the
world (rarely)
Fisher v Bell Flick knife in shop window Shop display an ITT not an offer.
Pharmaceutical Society
of GB v Boots
Medicines on shop shelves Display is an ITT. Point of sale is
at counter
Harvey v Facey Lowest price for Bumper Hall Pen
900
Supply of information re selling
price is not an offer
Harris v Nickerson Auction cancelled sued for
expenses
Advert re auction was ITT to an
offer hence no contract
Errington v Errington Father bought house for couple.
Promised to transfer if they
paid mortgage. Widow
refused
Unilateral offer could not be
revoked while
consideration was
executory
Hyde v Wrench Sale of farm buyer tried to get
price reduction
Counter offer revokes original offer
Felthouse v Bindley Trying to buy a horse. Assume its
mine if I dont hear from
you
Silence cannot be acceptance
Entores v Miles Far
Eastern
Acceptance faxed from Amsterdam
to London
Valid when received and read in
London
Byrne v Van Tienhoven Acceptance and revocation letters
crossing in post
Revocation of offer only effective
when received and read.
Acceptance valid when
posted.
-
7/30/2019 ACCA F4 Cases Summary
2/8
Consideration
Case Reminder Point of law
Re McArdle Tenant decorating house Past consideration is no good
Collins v Godefroy Witness promised money to give
evidence already
subpoenad
No consideration promise was
already legal obligation
Glasbrook Brothers v
Glamorgan CC
Police requested to subdue
picketing strikers
Police had done more than normal
obligation consideration
was supplied
Stilk v Myrick Sailors mutinied others offered a
rise to stay
No consideration rise was not
enforceable
Hartley v Ponsonby More sailors mutinied others
offered a rise to stay
Extra duties were consideration
rise was enforceable
Williams v Roffey
Brothers
Sub-contractor offered a bonus to
finish on time
Avoidance of penalty for the main
contractor was
consideration for the bonus
Foakes v Beer Lender agreed delayed repayment
schedule with no interest
No consideration for variation of
contract. Interest was due
Central London Property
Trust v High
Trees House
Landlord offered to reduce rent on
high rise flats in WW2
Promissory estoppel. Variation
freely offered with no
coercion could not go
back on offer
Intention
Balfour v Balfour Husband went to Ceylon
promised to support wife
Domestic agreement presumed no
intention to create legal
relations
Jones v Vernon Pools Contract binding in honour only Presumption in commercialcontracts is that legal
relations are intended but
it can be rebutted.
-
7/30/2019 ACCA F4 Cases Summary
3/8
Contract terms and exclusion clauses
Poussard v Spiers &
Pond
Opera singer ill at start of run.
Producers put in
replacement
Failing to attend was breach of
condition gave right to
rescind
Bettini v Gye Opera singer 3 days late for
rehearsals
Attendance at all rehearsals was a
warranty breach gives
right to damages, not
rescission
Curtis v Chemical
Cleaning Co
Employee said exclusion clause
only applied to beads and
sequins
Misrepresentation rendered the
exclusion invalid
Thompson v LMS
Railway
Rail ticket referred to standard
conditions. They excluded
liability for everything.Train too long for platform
woman fell off
Exclusion clause was adequately
communicated
Olley v Marlborough
Court
Notice in hotel bedroom denied
liability for loss
Not effective communicated after
contract was made
Photo Productions v
Securicor
Securicor night watchman set fire to
building
Exclusion clause was effective
Misrepresentation
Leaf v International
Gallery
Sale of fake Constable Mistake was not operative.
Misrepresentation was
innocent so rescission was
only possible remedy. Sale
was 5 years ago too late
delay defeats equity
Performance
Cutter v Powell Sailor died part way into journey.Captain refused to pay
wages
No wages due part performance isno good
Sumpter v Hedges House part built. Builder went bust.
Asked for quantum meruit
No amount payable for building.
Acceptance could not be
freely given.
Hoenig v Isaacs House refurb largely completed but
not exactly to spec.
Homeowner refused to pay
Had to pay as performance
substantially completed.
Could deduct cost to finish
to spec
-
7/30/2019 ACCA F4 Cases Summary
4/8
Discharge by breach
Sumpter v Hedges Builder half built house. Asked for
part of price
No quantum meruit as customer
had no choice about
accepting
Hochster v de la Tour Tour courier cancelled trip well in
advance.
Immediate action for anticipatory
breach was allowed
White and Carter
(Councils) v
McGregor
Names on bins. Client cancelled
order before work done
Injured party can carry on
regardless and sue for full
price
Avery v Bowden Shipping contract cancelled in
advance. Wronged party
opted to continue and sue
for full price. War broke
out
War frustrated contract. Lost right
to sue
Omnium DEnterprise v
Sutherland
Ship chartered out then sold before
start of charter
Anticipatory breach - not
frustration. The events
were avoidable by the
owner
Remedies for breach of contract
Case Reminder Point of law
Hadley v Baxendale Broken mill shaft. Delay in fixinglead to great loss of
business
Remoteness of damage notforeseeable couldnt sue.
Victoria Laundry v
Newman
Industries
Delay in completing contract led to
huge cost from lost
business
Only liable for reasonably
foreseeable damages
Chaplin v Hicks Beauty contestant wrongly
excluded from contest
Difficult to assess damages but
plaintiff still entitled
Cellulose Acetate Silk vWidnes Foundry
Loss much bigger than contractallowed for
Damages fixed at level proscribedin contract.
Ford Motor Co v
Armstrong
Contract proscribed fixed damages
for trivial breaches
Penalty clauses not upheld. Only
sue for actual loss
Jarvis v Swan Tours Holiday not as good as described in
brochure
Could sue for disappointment and
distress
Warner Bros v Nelson Contract stopped Bette Davis
working for other film
companies
Injunction illustration
-
7/30/2019 ACCA F4 Cases Summary
5/8
AGENCY
Watteau v Fenwick Pub manager ordered cigars despite
specific orders not to. Pubowner refused to pay
Implied agency. Owner bound on
contract.
GNR v Swaffield Lonely, unaccompanied horse in
station. GNR arranged
stabling. Owner refused to
pay
Agency by necessity. Owner had to
pay.
Kelner v Baxter Promoters bought wine on behalf
of company not yet
formed.
Company not liable on contract as
did not exist when contract
made. Promoters personally
liable
Yonge v Toynbee Solicitors acted for client who had
gone insane.
Insanity ended agency. Solicitors
liable for breach of warranty
of authority.
-
7/30/2019 ACCA F4 Cases Summary
6/8
TORT
Donoghue v Stevenson Decomposed snail in ginger beer.
Great upset after drinking
Duty of care despite no contract.
Case established
negligence.
Bourhill v Young Woman heard crash looked out at
messy accident -
miscarried
No duty of care; too remote.
Hedley Byrne v Heller Ad agency gets positive reference
from banker of potential
client. Client then goes
bust owing money
Negligent mis-statement. Liable if
reasonably expect others to
rely on your statement
Caparo Inds v Dickman Caparo took over Fidelity relying
on info in audited accounts.These turned out to be in
error
Auditors normally only liable to
those to whom their opinion is directly
communicated.
Haley v LEB Blind person falling down marked
hole in road
LEB negligent. Must take into
account potential
susceptibility.
Watt v Herts CC Fireman injured while dashing off
to blaze.
Less care required if urgent
objective. Authority not
liable
Paris v Stepney BC One eyed mechanic no goggles
supplied. Blinded by freakshard.
Employer liable. More care
required given potentialseriousness
Bolton v Stone Freak cricket shot hit ball out of
ground injuring passer by.
Club not liable. Highly unlikely
accident.
ADT v Binder Hamlyn Partner gave verbal assurance to
buyer that accounts were
OK. Bought and lost
money.
Firm liable for negligent mis-
statement due to direct
comment.
ICI v Shatwell Explosive brothers. Willingly
playing with explosives
blown up
Volenti non fit injuria. Employer
not liable.
-
7/30/2019 ACCA F4 Cases Summary
7/8
EMPLOYMENT
Pepper v Hart Teacher sent child to school at
reduced fee. Revenue tried
to assess benefit at average
cost
Cost in legislation interpreted as
average cost. House of
Lords used Hansard to help
Hall v Lorimer Vision mixer worked for many
employers for short time
Self employed
COMPANY
Salomon v Salomon Company financed by owner
mainly by secured debt.
Company insolvent. Ownerclaimed security
Allowed. Company separate legal
person. Shareholder could
also be secured creditor
DHN Food Distributors
v Tower
Hamlets
Group company traded from
premises owned by other
group company.
Compulsorily demolished
Compensation payable both for
building and loss of trade.
Whole group viewed as
owner
Gilford Motor Co v
Horne
Mechanics contract banned
approaches to old
customers after leaving job.
Wrote out from newlimited company instead
Not allowed. Company a sham
merely to avoid contract
obligation
Daimler v Continental
Tyre and Rubber
1916 contract between 2 British
companies one with
German shareholders.
English company withdrew
No breach. Veil lifted to reveal other
company as enemy
Ebrahimi v Westbourne
Galleries
2 shareholders (60%) expelled
other shareholder as
director
Court agreed just and equitable
winding up as quasi
partnership
Hickman v KentSheepbreeders Articles said disputes must go toarbitration. Shareholder
sued company over dispute
Articles binding on shareholder. Hadto go to arbitration
Pender v Lushington Articles allowed 1 vote per share
up to max of 100. Large
holder passed some shares
to nominee. Chairman
wouldnt count votes
Articles binding on company. Had to
count votes
Rayfield v Hands Articles said that selling
shareholders must offer to
directors who would buy atfair price.
Articles binding shareholder v
shareholder. Directors
obliged to buy
-
7/30/2019 ACCA F4 Cases Summary
8/8
Eley v Positive Life Articles said Eley Co solicitor for
life. Sacked. Sued for
breach
Articles dont make contracts
between company and 3rd
party. Could not sue
Re New British Iron Articles stated directors to be paid1,000pa. Not paid
Articles can be used to flesh outexisting contract. 1,000
binding
Dafen Tinplate v Llanelli
Steel
Proposed change of articles to
allow directors to buy out
any shareholder
Not allowed. Not for benefit for
company as whole
Sidebottom v Kershaw
Leese
Proposed change of articles to
allow directors to buy out
any shareholder competing
with co
Allowed. Although bad for 1
shareholder, would benefit
co as a whole
Bushell v Faith 3 equal shareholder / directors.
Articles said attacked
director got treble votes. 2
tried to sack 3rd
Couldnt sack him. Any vote would
fail 2:3
Freeman & Lockyer v
Buckhurst Park
Director described himself as MD.
Made contract. Co refused
to pay.
Director held out as MD has
apparent authority to bind
co. Co must pay.
Panorama Developments
v Fidelis
Furnishings
Co secretary hired cars claiming for
co use. Used them
personally. Co refused to
pay
Secretary has apparent authority to
bind co in admin contracts.
Co had to pay.
Dorchester Finance v
Stebbing
Experienced accountant / director
signed blank cheques.
Colleague stole large sum.
Liable for breach of duty to use
skill and care. Accountant
should have known better.
Percival v Wright Shareholder selling. Directors
bought knowing share
price would rise soon
Directors OK. Duty owed to co as
whole not to individual
shareholders
Foss v Harbottle Minority shareholders bringingaction against director /
majority shareholder who
defrauded co
They failed. If wrong is done to aco, the proper plaintiff is
the co