ACADEMICPERFORMANCEREPORTEl-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz Academy

November 2019

OUR MISSIONTo transform public education through accountability, innovation andaccess to quality education for all students.

OUR VISIONWe envision a diverse and dynamic public education marketplacethat fosters academic excellence for all children.

OUR VALUESIntegrity | Respect | Compassion | InclusivenessSocial Responsibility | Excellence | Innovation

El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz AcademyTable of Contents

ACADEMY OVERVIEW

4 Demographics

5 Composite Resident District

ACADEMIC

6 Reading Achievement & Growth

8 Math Achievement & Growth

10 Michigan Test of Educational Progress (M-STEP) Achievement

11 Student Growth

12 Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test (PSAT) Achievement

14 Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) Achievement

END NOTES

15 Sources & Citations

© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 3

El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz AcademyDemographics

100%

99%

100%

100%

100%

100%

99%

98%

97%

100%

5%

10%

11%

9%

9%

1%

2%

29%

38%

37%

Studentsof Color

Free/ReducedLunch

SpecialEducation

EnglishLanguageLearner

Enrolled3 or MoreYears

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

2018−2019 2017−2018 2016−2017

2015−2016 2014−2015

ENROLLMENT BY SUBGROUP

Fig. D−1

260273246

212

306

0

100

200

300

400

500

2014

−201

5

2015

−201

6

2016

−201

7

2017

−201

8

2018

−201

9

Stu

dent

s

TOTAL ENROLLMENT BY YEAR

Fig. D−2

40 39

1

43 44 45

3

43

2

42

0

20

40

60

K 1 2 3 4 5 6

Stu

dent

s

Students Enrolled 0−2 Years

Students Enrolled 3+ Years

STUDENTS PER GRADE

Fig. D−3

African American

YourSchool

American Indian

CMUAverage

Asian

StateAverage

Hawaiian

Hispanic

Multiracial

White

95.7%

0.0%

1.0%

0.0%

0.0%

3.3%

0.0%

44.9%

0.3%

3.3%

0.0%

3.3%

8.0%

40.1%

17.6%

0.6%

3.5%

0.1%

8.0%

4.2%

66.0%

RACIAL/ETHNIC BREAKDOWN

Fig. D−4

4 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University

El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz AcademyComposite Resident District

The Composite Resident District (CRD) illustrates the public school district to which students would be assigned if they were notenrolled in the Academy. Due to geographical constraints, the map may not show all districts.

!(

Eaton County

Clinton County

Ingham County

Lansing302

!(

0 2 4Miles

!( School

El-Hajj MalikEl-ShabazzAcademy

Student’s Resident District Number of Students Percent of Students

Lansing Public School District 302 100.0%

Fig. D-5

© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 5

El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz AcademyReading Achievement

186

185

195

203

150

200

250

300

3 4 5 6Grade

Ave

rage

Sca

led

Sco

re

2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019 Achievement Targets

STUDENTS ENROLLED FOR ONE OR MORE YEARS AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

MAP® SPRING RESULTS − READING ACHIEVEMENT

15%

15% Students Met Target

85% Students Did Not Meet Target

2016−2017

15%

15% Students Met Target

85% Students Did Not Meet Target

2017−2018

12%

12% Students Met Target

88% Students Did Not Meet Target

2018−2019

PERCENT OF STUDENTS MEETING THE TARGET

Fig. A−1

6 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University

El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz AcademyReading Growth

Grade 3

160

180

200

220

Fall Spring

Grade 3

Grade 3

Grade 4

Fall Spring

Grade 4

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Fall Spring

Grade 5

Grade 4

Grade 5

Grade 6

160

180

200

220

Fall Spring

Grade 6

Fall Spring

NA

Fall Spring

NA

2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019

Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)

MAP FALL−TO−SPRING RESULTS − READING GROWTH

19%

18%

5%

59%34

2016−2017

27%

15%

3%

55% 39

2017−2018

20%

6%

3%

71%

22

2018−2019

Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)

MEDIAN GROWTH PERCENTILE & PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN PERCENTILE CATEGORIES

Fig. A−2

© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 7

El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz AcademyMath Achievement

191

194

203

207

150

200

250

300

3 4 5 6Grade

Ave

rage

Sca

led

Sco

re

2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019 Achievement Targets

STUDENTS ENROLLED FOR ONE OR MORE YEARS AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

MAP SPRING RESULTS − MATH ACHIEVEMENT

12%

12% Students Met Target

88% Students Did Not Meet Target

2016−2017

9%

9% Students Met Target

91% Students Did Not Meet Target

2017−2018

11%

11% Students Met Target

89% Students Did Not Meet Target

2018−2019

PERCENT OF STUDENTS MEETING THE TARGET

Fig. A−3

8 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University

El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz AcademyMath Growth

Grade 3

160

180

200

220

Fall Spring

Grade 3

Grade 3

Grade 4

Fall Spring

Grade 4

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Fall Spring

Grade 5

Grade 4

Grade 5

Grade 6

160

180

200

220

Fall Spring

Grade 6

Fall Spring

NA

Fall Spring

NA

2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019

Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)

MAP FALL−TO−SPRING RESULTS − MATH GROWTH

9%

13%

4%

74%

17

2016−2017

16%

11%

4%

69%

30

2017−2018

20%

9%

3%68%

29

2018−2019

Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)

MEDIAN GROWTH PERCENTILE & PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN PERCENTILE CATEGORIES

Fig. A−4

© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 9

El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz AcademyMichigan Test of Educational Progress (M-STEP) Achievement

Not Applicable

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Per

cent

Pro

ficie

nt

PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADES 3 THROUGH 7 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE

M−STEP ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS

Not Applicable

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Per

cent

Pro

ficie

nt

PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADES 3 THROUGH 7 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE

M−STEP MATH

Fig. A−5

10 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University

El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz AcademyStudent Growth

Not Applicable

20

40

60

80

Mea

n S

tude

nt G

row

th P

erce

ntile

MEAN STUDENT GROWTH PERCENTILE FOR ALL STUDENTS AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS

Not Applicable

20

40

60

80

Mea

n S

tude

nt G

row

th P

erce

ntile

MEAN STUDENT GROWTH PERCENTILE FOR ALL STUDENTS AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE

MATH

Fig. A−6

© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 11

El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz AcademyPreliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test (PSAT) Achievement

Not Applicable

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Per

cent

Pro

ficie

nt

PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT

PSAT GRADE 8 EVIDENCE−BASED READING AND WRITING

Not Applicable

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Per

cent

Pro

ficie

nt

PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT

PSAT GRADE 8 MATH

Fig. A−7

12 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University

El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz AcademyPSAT Achievement

Not Applicable

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Per

cent

Pro

ficie

nt

PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT

PSAT GRADES 9 & 10 EVIDENCE−BASED READING AND WRITING

Not Applicable

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Per

cent

Pro

ficie

nt

PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT

PSAT GRADES 9 & 10 MATH

Fig. A−8

© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 13

El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz AcademyScholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) Achievement

Not Applicable

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Per

cent

Pro

ficie

nt

PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADE 11 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE

GRADE 11 SAT EVIDENCE−BASED READING AND WRITING

Not Applicable

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Per

cent

Pro

ficie

nt

PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADE 11 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE

GRADE 11 SAT MATH

Fig. A−9

14 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University

El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz AcademySources & Citations

Fig. D-1 CEPI Public Data; Michigan Student Data System (MSDS) fall – UnauditedFig. D-2 CEPI Public DataFig. D-3 MSDS fall – Unaudited; The display of 3+ students in kindergarten and first grade is due to the enrollment date provided in the fall MSDS.Fig. D-4 MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. D-5 MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. A-1 NWEA’s MAP: reading – spring; MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. A-2 NWEA’s MAP: reading – springFig. A-3 NWEA’s MAP: math – spring; MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. A-4 NWEA’s MAP: math – springFig. A-5 Spring M-STEP – Student-level and Public DataFig. A-6 Spring MI-Access, M-STEP, PSAT 8, SAT – Student-level and Public DataFig. A-7 Spring PSAT 8 – Student-level and Public DataFig. A-8 Spring PSAT 9 & 10 – Student-levelFig. A-9 Spring SAT – Student-level and Public Data

© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 15

THE GOVERNOR JOHN ENGLER CENTER FOR CHARTER SCHOOLSCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY | MOUNT PLEASANT, MI 48859

(989) 774-2100 | www.TheCenterForCharters.org