academic agility: navigating higher education web development
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Academic Agility: Navigating Higher Education Web
Development
Ryan Dellolio
Given at eduWEB 2011, San Antonio, TXAugust 1, 2011
Web Program ManagerColumbian College of Arts and Sciences
The George Washington University
Adjunct LecturerDepartment of Information Systems
School of BusinessThe George Washington University
&
Tips, tricks, observations, and lessoned at The George Washington University in Washington, DC.
Overview GWU Overview Pose a question Pose a revision to that question Establish necessity of answering question What makes academia different when it comes to
web management Why be agile? Tale of two projects Staffing
The George Washington University1821 University founded
25,000 Total students at all locations
4 Campuses
225,000 Alumni worldwide
10 Colleges and Schools
Web Activity at GW
University
Colleges
Departments
Research Centers & Institutes
ColumbianCollege ofArts & Sciences
500+ faculty and researchers
3000 students
100+ staff
University’s largest academic unit
Africana StudiesAmerican StudiesAnthropologyApplied Quantitative Risk AnalysisArt TherapyBiochemistryBiological SciencesBiomedical SciencesBiostatisticsChemistryClassical and Semitic Languages and LiteraturesClassical ActingCounselingEarly Modern European StudiesEast Asian Languages and LiteraturesEconomicsEnglishEnvironmental StudiesEnvironmental Resource PolicyEpidemiologyFilm Studies
Fine Arts and Art HistoryForensic SciencesGeographyGeological SciencesGenomics and BioinformaticsGlobal CommunicationsHistoryHominid PaleobiologyInterior DesignJudaic StudiesLinguisticsMathematicsMedia and Public AffairsMedicine, Society and CultureMuseum StudiesMusicOrganizational Sciences and CommunicationPhilosophyPhysicsPolitical ScienceProfessional Psychology
PsychologyPublic Policy and Public AdministrationReligionRomance, German, Slavic Languages and LiteraturesSociologySpeech and Hearing SciencesStatisticsTheatre and DanceUniversity Writing ProgramWomen's Studies
50+ Departments and Programs
Brochureware
Information Management
Web Services
Research
Classroom Resources
Other
Web Properties
Our organization
Web Program Management
Web Program Manager
Content and Content Strategy
Web Content Producer
Marketing & Social Media
Director
DevelopmentWeb
DesignerWeb
DeveloperWeb
DeveloperProject Analyst
IT Program Management“Dotted line” to IT group
Columbian Web Landscape
35+ department
websites
4+ online collaboration
tools
15+ program websites
30+ wikis and other
online research
tools
14+ dept/prog
blogs
15+ online tools and
mgt. systems
500,000+pageviews / month
• New development• Redevelopment• Information architecture• Web marketing• Social media• Web strategy and consulting
Our Pipeline
How can University staff navigate the delicate balance between their requirements and available resources?
Higher education…
Higher Impact
Higher Reward
Higher Cause
Higher Risk?
Higher education…
Higher Stress
Higher Volume
Higher Expectations
Higher Bureaucracy
The “everyday” viewRequirement Solution“The Department of Religion needs an informational website”
Meet with stakeholders to design website, implement in CMS, coordinate content, and launch.
“The Physics Department’s website needs to integrate with an online data analysis tool for current students and interested non-affiliated researchers”
Establish capabilities of current website, integrate into existing CMS or build custom functionality for integration, and launch.
“The Center for Economic Research’s new website needs to make its research internationally available through RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)”
Meet with stakeholders to design website, implement in CMS, build in RePEc XML output, coordinate content, and launch.
The “academic” viewRequirement Solution“The Department of Religion needs an informational website”
What other design & CMS assets exist that we can apply to the Dept. of Religion?
“The Physics Department’s website needs to integrate with an online data analysis tool for current students and interested non-affiliated researchers”
Who else in the University is using tools like this? Plot as future functionality.
“The Center for Economic Research needs to make its research internationally available through RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)”
One-off RePEc solution, faculty sponsored or dept sponsored.
The too oft-seen realityRequirement Solution“The Department of Religion needs an informational website”
What other projects are going on that we can group together with this one? Who else needs a website and why the Dept. of Religion?
“The Physics Department’s website needs to integrate with an online data analysis tool for current students and interested non-affiliated researchers”
Can our current systems support this? Has someone in the department already integrated in a one-off solution (probably yes!)
“The Center for Economic Research needs to make its research internationally available through RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)”
Let’s build RePEc functionality on a separate system as the central system(s) do not support custom XML out.
How can University staff navigate the delicate balance between their requirements, available resources and the unique challenges of the higher education arena?
Why Academia is Different 1
Web is traditionally seen as far from the core mission
Where is the web in relation to a university's core mission?
Why Academia is Different 1
“The George Washington University, an independent academic institution chartered by the Congress of the United States in 1821, dedicates itself to furthering human well-being. The University values a dynamic, student-focused community stimulated by cultural and intellectual diversity and built upon a foundation of integrity, creativity, and openness to the exploration of new ideas. The George Washington University, centered in the national and international crossroads of Washington, D.C., commits itself to excellence in the creation, dissemination, and application of knowledge.”
Competition in Academia
• Enrollment competition is only one piece of the puzzle
• Competition extends to:o Student attention to university news and eventso Alumni participation and developmento Prestige, online and off lineo Academic attention on the weboUse of in-house services vs. the wild west
How to respondEvaluation criteria must always be comprehensive
• Management costs• Development resources• In-house expertise• Availability needs• Budget• TCO• Impact on “creation, dissemination, and
application of knowledge”
Why Academia is Different 2
Lack of quality control feedback loops
How to respondBake people, process and technology into existing bureaucratic structures, establishing web governance.
• “Strategy, not sparring”• Educate upwards
ScenariosScenario Governance Example
No web management organization Website checklist or website guidelines
Integrated web management organization (e.g. ‘Web Guy’ on comm staff)
Monthly web sync meetings with non-web staff incl. non-comm staff
Small web management organization, lack of formal procedures, standards, and systems
Codified web checkpoints, goals and metrics. Monthly web sync meetings with non-web staff incl. non-comm staff
Mid-to-large size web management organization, formal procedures, standards and systems
Weekly web sync meetings, matrix organization of resources to distribute skills and productivity
Small decentralized web management groups (e.g. ‘web guys all around’, blend of formal and non-formal procedures, standards and systems
Weekly web sync meetings, codification of web practices and standards. Design/style guidelines, assets & themes pool
Why Academia is Different 3
Non hierarchical structures
How to respondWe must redesign our use cases and think outside the box. Consider:
• Current students browsing admissions sites• Prospective students browsing information for current
students• Prospective partner institutions browsing information
for current students• Prospective students browsing internal department
websites• “Navigation-phobia” – the chronic Googlers• Entrance paths that often defy logic
“Agility” summarizes how best to respond to this environment.
Break the waterfall, be agile!
Building the Web at the pace of research
Requirements
Analysis
Design
Implementation
Validation
The traditional systems development lifecycle is not well suited to most higher education web projects
A comparison
• We’ve seen improvement in nearly every metric by adopting development agility.
Better
• More requirements scoped and met, we can innovate• User satisfaction increases
Faster
• Deadlines are exceeded• More QA time
Cheaper
• Agility reduces resource drain• Costly requirements changes can be accommodated
Agile software development is necessary but not sufficient
Agility is also…
“the gracefulness of a person or animal that is quick and nimble”
“the power of moving quickly and easily; nimbleness”
Source: Princeton WordNet
Source: Random House Dictionary
The group tasked with web management must also be
organizationally agile
What must be nimble?
• our websites• our access mechanisms• our integration needs• our environments,• our present and future requirements
What’s moving? (or: why must we be nimble?)
• departments, programs, institutes• bureaucracy• research interests• faculty members• staff• research itself• priorities
“Agile Abe”
Manifestation of Agility 1
Recognize the web is more than a marketing tool.
Marketing Mindset
Misplaced metrics
Poor Design
Decisions
User experience
suffers
Enrollment push Marketing is
just one component of a successful web strategy
Manifestation of Agility 2
Lose control.
Full control is difficult in the academic community, and misguided
• Empowerment vs. limitation• Governance vs. government• Guiding vs. requiring• Advising vs. insisting
Manifestation of Agility 3
Let strategic tools foster positive outcomes
Consider:
• Intuitive newsletter generator• A CMS that makes it easy to edit and
understand• Web services model
Lagrangian points of multi-site management
“One of five points in the plane of orbit of one body around another (e.g., the moon around the earth) at which a small third body can remain stationary with respect to both.”
Source: OxfordSource: NASA JPL
Stability through agility is:
• Responding to changing requirements with repeatable processes
• Allowing innovation to occur within the fold• Fostering intra-University relationships even if they do
not yield desired end results• Fostering extra-University relationships of cooperation
and collaboration
This does not mean keep your web operations stationary. It means keep them stable.
A tale of two projectsInternational Art Therapy Research Database
Abstract: Art Therapy Program needs an advanced collaboration platform for content management and delivery , spearheading international Art Therapy research.
Statistics Department Website Overhaul
Abstract: Statistics Department has an old (4+ years) website and needs a fresh one with fresh content, that’s easily updated and conforms to University design templates.
• Common infrastructure• Common helpdesk• Common student content-entry support• Common authentication system• Stability through agility made both projects a success.
How we’ve found our Lagrangian point
• Project-based matrix organization of technical resources
• Formal issue and project tracking• Standard intake process• Single front door• Common methodology, design parameters
and principles• Assets for those who can utilize them
How we’ve found our Lagrangian point
• Out-of-box repeatable solutions including:– Content management systems (Drupal)– Research collaboration tools (Wikis)– Hosting infrastructure (LAMP)– Information architectures– Content templates
• Student “army” with standard on-boarding procedures
• Central authentication management
Output
Process
ContentTech.
Holistic approach to web management
With 100+ websites, dozens of applications & countless organizations to support, there are few alternative approaches.
Finding your Lagrangian point (small/limited web management)
• Identify sources of technical expertise, and make contributions repeatable
• Codify processes, make them repeatable• Embrace ‘web as a platform’ for common tasks• Factor people, process, technology into large
projects (e.g. contractor-supported web overhaul)
• Ask: Does every request/new requirement have a path to completion?
Finding your Lagrangian point (larger web management group)
• What are our common pitfalls and how can we empower our constituents to avoid them?– “____ Department always produces poor quality
newsletter or webpages”– “Our technology consultation costs have
skyrocketed”– “University leadership imposes strict visual
guidelines”– “Our in-house IT team can’t keep up with changing
technologies”
Finding your Lagrangian point (larger web management group)
• How can we structure our processes?– Single front door– Issue tracking– Knowledge base
• What does our organization look like?
Dir/VP of Comm.
Web Developer
Web Designer
Content Creator
Web Manager
How are new projects chosen?How are new technologies chosen?Which comes first, content or function?How agile will this group be on the web?
Compare to
CIO
Web Developer
Web Designer
Content Creator
Web Manager
How are new projects chosen?How are new technologies chosen?Which comes first, content or function?How agile will this group be on the web?
Compare to
Dir/VP of Comm
Comm Staff
Comm Staff
Web Developer
Web Designer
Content Creator
How are new projects chosen?How are new technologies chosen?Which comes first, content or function?How agile will this group be on the web?
52 informational sites, 1200+ pages at last audit
It is a privilege to work on the web.
Contact
Ryan DellolioThe George Washington UniversityWashington, [email protected](202) 994-5497