abderrazak, et al
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
1/37
LETTERS
Large colonial organisms with coordinated growth in
oxygenated environments 2.1 Gyr agoAbderrazak El Albani1, Stefan Bengtson2, Donald E. Canfield3, Andrey Bekker4, Roberto Macchiarelli5,6,
Arnaud Mazurier7, Emma U. Hammarlund2,3,8, Philippe Boulvais9, Jean-Jacques Dupuy10, Claude Fontaine1,
Franz T. Fursich11, Francois Gauthier-Lafaye12, Philippe Janvier13, Emmanuelle Javaux14, Frantz Ossa Ossa1,
Anne-Catherine Pierson-Wickmann9, Armelle Riboulleau15, Paul Sardini1, Daniel Vachard15, Martin Whitehouse16
& Alain Meunier1
The evidence for macroscopic life during the Palaeoproterozoicera (2.51.6 Gyr ago) is controversial15. Except for the nearly
2-Gyrold coil-shaped fossil Grypania spiralis6,7
, which may havebeen eukaryotic, evidence for morphological and taxonomic bio-diversification of macroorganisms only occurs towards the begin-ning of the Mesoproterozoic era (1.61.0 Gyr)8. Here we report thediscovery of centimetre-sized structures from the 2.1-Gyr-oldblack shales of the Palaeoproterozoic Francevillian B Formationin Gabon, which we interpret as highly organized and spatiallydiscrete populations of colonial organisms. The structures areup to 12 cm in size and have characteristic shapes, with a simplebut distinct ground pattern of flexible sheets and, usually, a per-meating radial fabric. Geochemical analyses suggest that the sedi-ments were deposited under an oxygenated water column. Carbonand sulphur isotopic data indicate that the structures were distinctbiogenic objects, fossilized by pyritization early in the formation
of the rock. The growth patterns deduced from the fossil morpho-logies suggest that the organisms showed cell-to-cell signallingand coordinated responses, as is commonly associated with multi-cellular organization9. The Gabon fossils, occurring after the2.452.32-Gyr increase in atmospheric oxygen concentration10,may be seen as ancient representatives of multicellular life, whichexpanded so rapidly 1.5 Gyr later, in the Cambrian explosion.
Our samples come from the Francevillian Group,which belongs toa well-recognized lithostratigraphic succession, outcropping across35,000 km2 in southeastern Gabon11,12. This group is exposed in theintracratonic basins of Plateau des Abeilles, Lastoursville andFranceville (Fig. 1), and reaches a maximum thickness of about2,000 m.
The group consists of five unmetamorphosed and undeformed
sedimentary formations, FA to FE, bounded by conformable sur-faces11,12. The lower part of the sequence (FA Formation) comprisesfluvial deposits of a low-standsystem tract dominated by onshore-to-coastal sandstones. In the FB Formation, marine deltaic deposition isindicated by facies development and sedimentary structures such asload casts, water escape structures, cross-stratification and hum-mocky cross-stratification. Shallower water conditions are observedin the FC Formation, whereas subsequent deposits (FDand FE)show
intercalated volcanic and continental sediments accumulated duringthe ultimate filling phase of the basin (Supplementary Fig. 1).
1Laboratoire HYDRASA, UMR 6269 CNRS-INSU,Universite de Poitiers, 86022 Poitiers, France.2Department of Palaeozoology,Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden. 3Nordic Center for Earth Evolution, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark. 4Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Manitoba, R3T 2N2Canada. 5Departement Geosciences, Centre de Microtomographie, Universite de Poitiers, 86022 Poitiers, France. 6Departement de Prehistoire, UMR 7194 CNRS, Museum NationaldHistoireNaturelle, Paris,75005, France.7Societe Etudes RecherchesMateriaux, CRIBiopole,86000Poitiers,France.8Department of Geological Sciences,StockholmUniversity, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. 9Departement Geosciences, UMR 6118, Universite de Rennes, 35042 Rennes, France. 10Bureau de Recherches Geologiques et Minieres, 45060 Orleans,France. 11GeoZentrumNordbayern, Universitat Erlangen,Fachgruppe Palaoumwelt,D 91054 Erlangen,Germany. 12Laboratoire dHydrologieet de Geochimie de Strasbourg, UMR7517CNRS, 67084 Strasbourg, France. 13Departement Histoire de la Terre, UMR 7207 CNRS, Museum National dHistoire Naturelle, Paris, 75005, France. 14Departement de Geologie,Unite de Recherche Paleobotanique-Paleopalynologie-Micropaleontologie, Universite de Liege, Sart-Tilman Liege 4000, Belgium. 15Laboratoire Geosystemes, FRE 3298 CNRS,Universite Lille 1, 59655 Villeneuve dAscq, France. 16Laboratory for Isotope Geology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden.
Volcanic rocks of NGoutou
0 50 km
Gabon
Plateau des
Abeilles
Lastoursville
Basin
Ondili shoal
Okondja
Basin
Volcanic complex of NGoutou
Archean basement
Francevillian
Basin
Franceville
Phanaerozoic deposit
Francevillian group
Gneiss of Okanja
Gneiss of Ogoue
Gneiss and granite (Archaean)
Figure 1 | Simplified geological map of Gabon. Showing the Francevillianbasin (inset) and the location of the fossiliferous site (star) near the town ofFranceville.
Vol 466 | 1 July 2010 | doi:10.1038/nature09166
100
Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved2010
http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nature09166http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nature09166http://www.nature.com/naturehttp://www.nature.com/nature -
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
2/37
The lower part of the investigated FB2 section, where FB2 is theupper part of FB, outcropping near Franceville, consists of sandstonebeds deposited in channels near the fair-weather wave base in thelow-energy environment of a prograding delta. The topmost part ofthis section consists of an oxidized and stromatolitic hardgroundsurface. This is sharply overlain by a 5-m-thick deposit of finelylaminated horizontal black shales, interbedded with thin siltstonelayers, deposited by waning storm surge without any evidence forsubaerialexposure(SupplementaryFig. 1).The ageof theFB deposits
is well constrained to 2,1006 30 Myr (refs 1315), roughly con-temporaneous with the,2.222.10 Gyr Lomagundi marine positivecarbon-isotope excursion16 (see Supplementary Information andSupplementary Fig. 1) and about 200250 Myr after the first signifi-cant rise in atmospheric oxygen concentration10.
More than 250 pyritized specimens embedded within their sedi-mentary matrix were collected in situfrom at least 18 thin horizons,identified within the FB2 black shale lithofacies (SupplementaryFig. 2). In some cases, the layers containing the specimens werelocally coated with iron oxides, owing to oxidation of pyrite crystals.The specimens range in shape from elongated to nearly isodiametricforms, with occasional finger-like protrusions (Fig. 2, SupplementaryFig. 3). Their length and width range from 7 to 120 mm and from,5to 70 mm respectively, and their thickness varies from,1 to 10 mm.
We estimate a density of up to 40 specimens per m2, with forms ofdifferent sizes and shapes and disparate orientations occurringtogether (Supplementary Figs 3, 4).
We used micro-computed tomography (micro-CT)-based three-dimensional (3D) imaging to characterize the outer and innermorphologies of the structures (see Supplementary Information).Most specimens show a pattern of radial fabric at the outer edge oftheir undulate or lobate periphery (Figs 2, 3, 4ac, SupplementaryFigs 58); this is often curved, so as to meet the outer rim at a roughlyperpendicular angle. In some cases, the radial fabric does not reachthe outer rim (Fig. 4d), whereas in others it is simply lacking. Thecentral parts of the larger forms are commonly thrown into smooth,transverse folds, which do not reach the outer edge and which areexternally expressed as wrinkling of the structure (Figs 3, 4bc,
Supplementary Fig. 68, 11). Laminae of the host shale are drapedaround the folds (Supplementary Fig. 13), showing that the foldingoccurred before compaction. X-ray diffraction analyses show nomineralogical difference between the clay matrices in the specimensand the host shale (Supplementary Fig. 14, Supplementary Table 1).
Thelarger specimensoften alsocontaina central pyrite body (Figs 3,4c, d, Supplementary Figs 8, 11), which is developed differently.Sometimes it forms a median layer within the folded sheet (Sup-plementary Figs 68), but it is more often nodular (Figs 3b, 4cd,Supplementary Figs 8, 11), sometimes deflecting the transversefolds (Fig. 4c, Supplementary Fig. 11). We measured topographicthickness along geometrically homologous virtual sections, whichindicated progressive thinning towards the periphery (Supplemen-tary Figs 9, 10).
Differences in X-ray attenuation within the specimens are largelydue to the differential distribution of octahedral pyrite crystals. Theperipheral radialfabric is characterizedby pyrite-freeregionsexpressedin the microfabric as canals or slits (Supplementary Figs 12, 15).Secondary-ionizationmass-spectrometric analysis of the pyrite revealsverylightd34S values of about225% to230% in the fossilized sheets,with the central pyrite nodule tending towards heaviervalues of 5% to15%, particularly in theouter margins (Fig. 5, SupplementaryTable2).The sheet, which represents the main body of the fossilized structure,was therefore pyritizedduringearly diagenesis, when sulphate reducerswere in direct contact with the effectively unlimited sulphate pool ofthe overlying water column. The high fractionations suggest sulphateconcentrations in excess of 200 mM (ref. 17) (Supplementary Fig. 17).The pyritized nodules apparently formed later, from pore fluids more
depleted in sulphate, and the pattern of sulphur isotopes suggests that
b
a
Figure 2 | Examples of black shale bedding surfaces. a, b, Bearingmacrofossils in colony form from the FB2 level. Scale bars, 1.0 cm.
b
c
a
Figure 3 | In situ macrofossil specimen from the FB2 Formation. a, Lowerside of the fossil (top) with its impression left in the black shales (bottom),showing peripheral radial fabric and wrinkled appearance. b, Micro-CT-based virtual reconstruction (volume rendered in semi-transparency),showing radial fabric and two inner pyrite concretions. c, Longitudinal
virtual section running close to the estimated central part of the specimen,evidencing the fold pattern. Scale bars, 1.0 cm.
NATURE | Vol 466 | 1 July 2010 LETTERS
101
Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved2010
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
3/37
pyritization began at the centre and continued towards the outer mar-gins, during which process the remaining sulphate became progres-sively more depleted in light isotopes. The sulphur isotope patternsthussupport the interpretation that the pyritized sheets represent earlydiagenesis of original biological fabric, whereas the occasional centrallump of pyrite is a later, post-burial, diageneticfeaturethatis notlikelyto reflect original morphology.
The differences in the organic carbon d13C content recordedbetween five specimens and their associated host shale sediment alsosupport the fossilized structures representing a distinct organic entity(Supplementary Table 3). Plants and biomineralized animal tissuesof the Phanaerozoic eon are commonly pyritized; pyritization of softtissues is rare but typically results in faithful replication. This preser-vation is thought to be favoured by a low content of organic mole-cules and high content of reactive iron in the pore-waters18.
We find no evidence to support an inorganic origin of the struc-tures from the FB2 black shale level, whether concretions resultingfrom epitaxic/crystal growth processes, or features of diagenetic,sedimentary, hydrothermal, or tectonic origin. There is a superficialresemblance between the Gabon structures and the Ediacaran dubio-fossil Mawsonites spriggi, which has been interpreted as a sand vol-cano interacting with biomats19; however, this interpretationaccounts for neither the fine internal radial fabric nor the inner fold
pattern of the Gabon fossils, and there is no structural evidence ofsediment injection in association with the fossils. The Gabon fossilsalso resemble radially growing pyrite or marcasite crystals, or pyritesuns, whichare occasionally foundin Phanaerozoic shales. However,a micro-CT-based comparison of the inner structures clearly showsthat the pyrite suns have a much more regular and linear radialfabric than the Gabon specimens, and that this fabric extends allthe wayto the centre of thestructure, without any evidence of flexiblefolding (Supplementary Fig. 16). Indeed, we are unaware of anyinorganic processes that can generate the style of flexible foldingandirregular radialfabric that we observe in theGabonfossils(Fig.4).
The accumulated evidence suggests thatthe structures are biogenic.The fold pattern seen in the centre of most of the specimens indicatesdeformation of a flexible sheet, implying an originally cohesive struc-ture of organic composition. The radial fabric is commonly deflectedto meet the rim of the specimen, suggesting that the original materialwas growing by peripheral accretion of flexible organic matter. Weconclude that the Gabon structures fulfil the general criteria of bio-genicity applied to fossil-like forms in the early rock record20
(Supplementary Table 4). The presence of abundant organic matterin the FB Formation21,22 (Supplementary Table 5), including steranesof eukaryotic origin23, is consistent with this interpretation.
We consider it most likely that these structures represent fossilizedcolonial organisms. Bacterial colonies growing on surfaces are knownto coordinate their behaviour, resulting in regular shapes anddistinctfabrics9; radial fabrics are common, and are thought to be due torepulsive chemotaxis24. Most studies of bacterial colony growth havebeen done on monocultures in Petri dishes, where colonies exceedcentimetre size9. In nature, fairy-ring colonies, formed by cyano-bacteria and diatoms and reaching a diameter of 15 cm, have been
a b c d
a b c d
a b c d
a b c d
Figure 4 | Micro-CT-based reconstructions and virtual sections of fourspecimens from the FB2 macrofossil record of Gabon. Samples show adisparity of forms based on: external size and shape characteristics;peripheral radial microfabric (missing in viewd); patterns of topographicthickness distribution; general inner structural organization, includingoccurrence of folds(seenin views b and c) andof a nodular pyriteconcretionin the central part of the fossil (absent in views a and b). a, Originalspecimen. b, Volume rendering in semi-transparency. c, Transverse (axial)two-dimensional section. d, Longitudinal section running close to theestimated central part of the specimen. Scale bars, 5 mm. Specimens fromtop to bottom: G-FB2-f-mst1.1, G-FB2-f-mst2.1, G-FB2-f-mst3.1, G-FB2-f-mst4.1.
1 mm30
15
34S
Figure 5 | Section through specimen G-FB2-f-mst4.3. d34S values(colouredspots, seescale) are measured in the central pyritenodule (centre)and surrounding sheet material (top and bottom) by secondary-ionizationmass spectrometry. See Supplementary Information.
LETTERS NATURE | Vol 466 | 1 July 2010
102
Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved2010
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
4/37
reported25. Nonetheless, structures similar to those from Gabon areunknown in the available fossil record and, because of their complexinner structural morphology and the sterane signature in the FBrocks, it is also possible that they represent colonial eukaryotes.
Microbial mat-forming communities, including organisms whosephototactic behaviour modifies the mat shape, are inferred to havebeen prevalent in marine and lacustrine environments from the earlyArchaean eon26. Because of their sediment-binding properties, suchmats often leave characteristic structures in carbonates and siliciclas-
tic rocks. Such structures, however, including those formed in shalesand mudstones, do not resemble the Gabon fossils27. Colonies withregular fabric resulting from coordinated-growth behaviour, as weinfer for the Gabon fossils, represent a degree of organization differ-ent to that of such mat-forming communities. They require cell-to-cell signalling and coordinated responses, akin to that required formulticellular organization9. The Gabon fossils represent the earliestevidence for such signalling and coordinated-growth behaviour onthe scale of macroorganisms.
One fundamental selective advantage of multicellularity is largesize28, butambient oxygen levelsmust be high enoughto allow aerobicorganisms to grow large. Our iron-speciation analyses reveal lowratiosof highly reactive iron to total iron (FeHR/FeT)
29, consistent withsediment deposition under an oxygenated water column (Sup-
plementary Fig. 18). This implies that these fossil organisms, livingon the sediment surface, were likely to engage in aerobic respiration.This is consistent with the timing of deposition, some 200 to 250 Myrafter the first accumulation of oxygen into the atmosphere10,30.
Although we cannot determine the precise nature and affinities ofthe 2.1-Gyr macroorganisms from the Francevillian B Formation ofGabon, we interpret these fossils as ancient representatives of multi-cellular life, which expanded so rapidly 1.5 Gyr later.
METHODS SUMMARY
We assessed textural relations between the pyritized sheet and the shale matrixembedding the macrofossils on sections, using a Nikon Eclipse E600. We carried
out scanning electron microscopy on a JEOL 5600 LV, equipped with an Oxford
EDX for mineralogical analyses. We obtained X-ray diffraction patterns fromrandomly-oriented powders and oriented preparations using a PANalyticalXPert diffractometer(Ni-filtered Cu-Ka radiation),equipped withan accelerator
detector (2u 2h analysis angle).
We ran high-resolution micro-CT on X8050-16 Viscom AG equipment. Wemade reconstructions using DigiCT v.2.3 (Digisens), 64-bit version, running ona 2.5GHzDell T7400 PrecisionWindowsXP 64workstationwith 32GB ofDDR
RAM and two NVIDIA graphic cards (Quadro FX 5600 and Telsa C870). Wecarriedout virtual sections and3D renderingon AVIZO v.5(MercuryComputer
Systems). We carried out SRXTM tomographic microscopy at the X02DATOMCAT beamline of the Swiss Light Source at the Paul Scherrer Institute(http://www.psi.ch/).
We studied organic matter using Rock-Eval III pyrolysis (Oil Show
Analyzer). We took isotopic measurements (d13Ccarb) on a VG Sira 10 triplecollector mass spectrometer. We investigated iron speciation using the sequen-
tial extraction protocol, and determined sulphide concentrations by the chro-mium reduction method (CRM). We measured the concentration of iron in all
iron fractions, except for pyrite, by atomic absorption spectrometry. We mea-suredthe d34S compositionof bulk rock on Ag2S precipitates from samplesof thesulphide that was liberated by CRM. We added about 200mg to a tin cup with
V2O5 and combusted it using a Thermo elemental analyser coupled via aConflow III interface to a Thermo Delta V Plus mass spectrometer. We analysedS isotopes (32S, 33S and 34S) by secondary-ionization mass spectrometry using a
Cameca IMS1270e7.
For further details of sample treatment and analytical procedures, seeSupplementary Information.
Received 29 March; accepted 4 May 2010.
1. Seilacher, A.,Bose, P. K. & Pfluger,F. Triploblasticanimals morethan 1 billion years
ago: trace fossil evidence from India. Science 282, 8083 (1998).
2. Knoll, A. H., Javaux, E. J., Hewitt, D. & Cohen, P. Eukaryotic organisms in
Proterozoic oceans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 361, 10231038 (2006).
3. Bengtson, S., Rasmussen, B. & Krapez, B. The Paleoproterozoic megascopic
Stirling biota. Paleobiology 33, 351
381 (2007).
4. Lamb, D. M., Awramik, S. M. & Zhu, S. Paleoproterozoic compression-like
structures from the Changzhougou Formation, China: eukaryotes or clasts?
Precambr. Res. 154, 236247 (2007).
5. Rasmussen, B., Fletcher, I. R., Brocks, J. J. & Kilburn, M. R. Reassessing the first
appearance of eukaryotes and cyanobacteria. Nature 455, 11011105 (2008).
6. Han,T.-M. & Runnegar,B. Megascopic eukaryotic algaefrom the 2.1-billion-year-
old Negaunee Iron-Formation, Michigan. Science 257, 232235 (1992).
7. Schneider, D.A., Bickford,M. E.,Cannon, W.F., Schulz, K.J. & Hamilton,M. A.Age
of volcanic rocks and syndepositional iron formations, Marquette Range
Supergroup: implications for the tectonic setting of Paleoproterozoic iron
formations of the Lake Superior region. Can. J. Earth Sci. 39, 9991012 (2002).
8. Bengtson, S., Belivanova, V., Rasmussen, B. & Whitehouse, M. The controversialCambrian fossils of the Vindhyan are real but more than a billion years older.
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 77297734 (2009).
9. Shapiro, J. A. & Dworkin, M. (eds) Bacteria as Multicellular Organisms (Oxford
Univ. Press, 1997).
10. Bekker,A. etal. Datingthe riseof atmosphericoxygen. Nature 427, 117120 (2004).
11. Gauthier-Lafaye, F. & Weber, F. The Francevillian (Palaeoproterozoic) uranium
ore deposits of Gabon. Chem. Geol. 84, 22672285 (1989).
12. Gauthier-Lafaye, F. & Weber, F. Natural nuclear fission reactors: time constraints
for occurrence, and their relation to uranium and manganese deposits and to the
evolution of the atmosphere. Precambr. Res. 120, 81100 (2003).
13. Bros, R., Stille, P., Gauthier-Lafaye, F., Weber, F. & Clauer, N. Sm-Nd isotopic
dating of Proterozoic clay material: an example from the Francevillian
sedimentary series, Gabon. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 113, 207218 (1992).
14. Hoori, K., Hidaka, H. & Gauthier-Lafaye, F. U-Pbgeochronology andgeochemistry
of zircon from the Franceville series at Bidoudouma, Gabon. The 15th Annual
Goldschmidt Conference. (2005).
15. Gancarz, A. J. in The Natural Fission Reactors: Annual International Atomic Energy
Agency Conference 513
520 (TC-119/40, IAEA, 1978).
16. Bekker, A. et al. Fractionation between inorganic and organic carbon during the
Lomagundi (2.222.1 Ga) carbon isotope excursion. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 271,
278291 (2008).
17. Habicht, K. S., Gade, M., Thamdrup, B., Berg, P. & Canfield, D. E. Calibration of
sulfate levels in the Archean ocean. Science 298, 23722374 (2002).
18. Farrell, U. C.,Martin, M. J.,Hagadorn, J. W.,Whiteley, T. & Briggs, D. E. G. Beyond
Beechers Trilobite Bed: widespread pyritization of soft tissues in the Late
Ordovician Taconic foreland basin. Geology 37, 907910 (2009).
19. Seilacher, A., Buatois, L. & Mangano, M. G. Trace fossils in the
EdiacaranCambrian transition: behavioral diversification, ecological turnover
and environmental shift. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 227, 323356
(2005).
20. Wacey, D. Early Life on Earth: A Practical Guide (Springer, 2009).
21. Cortial, F., Gauthier-Lafaye, F. & Lacrampe-Couloume, G. Oberlin, A. & Weber, F.
Characterization of organic matter associated with uranium deposits in the
Francevillian formation of Gabon (lower proterozoic). Org. Geochem. 15, 7385
(1990).22. Mossman, D. J., Gauthier-Lafaye, F. & Jackson, S. Carbonaceous substances
associated with the Paleoproterozoic natural nuclear fission reactors of Oklo,
Gabon: paragenesis, thermal maturation and carbon isotopic and trace element
composition. Precambr. Res. 106, 135148 (2001).
23. Dutkiewicz, A., George, S. C., Mossman, D. J., Ridley, J. & Volk, H. Oil and its
biomarkers associated with the Palaeoproterozoic Oklo natural fission reactors,
Gabon. Chem. Geol. 244, 130154 (2007).
24. Ben-Jacob, E. Bacterial self-organization: co-enhancement of complexification
and adaptability in a dynamic environment. Philos. Transact. Ser. A 361, 12831312
(2003).
25. Grazhdankin, D. & Gerdes, G. Ediacaran microbial colonies. Lethaia 40, 201210
(2007).
26. Allwood, A. C., Walter, M. R., Kamber, B. S., Marshall, C. P. & Burch, I. W.
Stromatolite reef from the Early Archaean era of Australia. Nature 441, 714718
(2006).
27. Schieber, J. in Atlas of Microbial Mat Features Preserved within the Clastic Rock
Record (eds Schieber, J. et al.) 117134 (Elsevier, 2007).
28. Bonner, J. T. First Signals: The Evolution of Development (Princeton Univ. Press,
2000).
29. Canfield, D.E. etal. Ferruginous conditions dominatedlater Neoproterozoicdeep-
water chemistry. Science 321, 949952 (2008).
30. Frei, R., Gaucher, C., Poulton, S. W. & Canfield, D. E. Fluctuations in Precambrian
atmospheric oxygenation recorded by chromium isotopes. Nature 461, 250254
(2009).
Supplementary Information is linked to the online version of the paper atwww.nature.com/nature.
Acknowledgements We thank the Ministry of Mines, Oil, Energy and HydraulicResources and the General Direction of Mines and Geology of Gabon forcollaboration and assistance, and the French Embassy at Libreville and the FrenchMinistry for Foreign Affairs for support. We thank F. Mayaga-Mikolo, D. Beaufort,
B. Cost,D. Thieblemont,F. Pamboand H. Sigmund fordiscussions.For assistance inGabon and France, we acknowledge S. Accolas, T. Bonifait, B. Braconnier,N. Dauger, F. Duru, D. Fabry, F. Haessler, M. Jouve, G. Letort, D. Paquet, J.-C.Parneix, D. Proust, M. Stampanoni and X. Valentin. We also acknowledge the
NATURE | Vol 466 | 1 July 2010 LETTERS
103
Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved2010
http://www.psi.ch/http://www.nature.com/naturehttp://www.nature.com/naturehttp://www.psi.ch/ -
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
5/37
Institut Francais du Petrole, the Swiss Light Source (TOMCAT beamline) at thePaul Scherrer Institute, and the Centre de Microtomographie at the University ofPoitiers (CdMT).Nordsim is operated under an agreementof theJointCommitteeof the Nordic Research Councils for Natural Sciences (NOS-N), with further
funding from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation; this is Nordsimcontribution 256. Research was supported by the French CNRS-INSU, the Bureaude Recherches Geologiques et Minieres (BRGM), the Danish National ResearchFoundation and the Swedish Research Council.
Author Contributions A.E.A. conceived andheaded theproject. A.E.A., S.B., D.E.C.,E.H., A.B., R.M., J.-J.D., P.J. and A.Meunier designed research. A.E.A., A.Mazurier,E.H., F.O.O. and P.S. did field research. A.E.A. and F.O.O. analysed sedimentology.
A.E.A., S.B., F.T.F., P.S. and D.V. analysed morphology. A.E.A., S.B., R.M. andA.Mazurier carried out microtomographic analyses. E.J. analysed palynology.
A.E.A., C.F., F.O.O.and A.Meunier analysed mineralogy. S.B., D.E.C., A.B., E.H., P.B.,A.-C.P.-W., A.R. and M.W. carried out isotope and geochemical analyses. F.G.-L.
provided geological samples. A.E.A., S.B., D.E.C., A.B., R.M., A.Mazurier, E.H., P.B.,C.F., F.T.F., F.G.-L., P.J., E.J., F.O.O., A.-C.P.-W., A.R., D.V., M.W. and A.Meunieranalysed data. A.E.A., S.B., D.E.C., R.M. and E.H. wrote the main part of themanuscript. A.B., A.Mazurier, P.B., J.-J.D., C.F., F.T.F., F.G.-L., P.J., E.J., A.-C.P.-W.,A.R., D.V., M.W. and A.Meunier provided critical input to the manuscript.
Author Information The repository of the fossils is the Department ofGeosciences, University of Poitiers, France. Reprints and permissions informationis available at www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competingfinancial interests. Readers are welcome to comment on the online version of this
article at www.nature.com/nature. Correspondence and requests for materialsshould be addressed to A.E.A. ([email protected]).
LETTERS NATURE | Vol 466 | 1 July 2010
104
Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved2010
http://www.nature.com/reprintshttp://www.nature.com/naturemailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.nature.com/naturehttp://www.nature.com/reprints -
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
6/37
1 - The Francevillian Group and the FB2 section
Figure S1 | a, Lithostratigraphy of the Palaeoproterozoic Francevillian group with the fiveFormations (FA to FE) and age constraints shown. b, Detailed stratigraphy of the FB2 section
outcropping near the town of Franceville, showing the macrofossil-bearing levels (black
shales). c, Stratigraphic evolution of
13
Ccarb values and of total organic carbon (TOC, wt. %)contents (see Tab. S5).
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 1
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
7/37
Two Sm-Nd isochrons on clay minerals formed during the very early diagenesis give the
FB Formation an age of 2099 115 million years (Ma) (Bros et al., 1992). Zircons from the
tuff in the overlying FD Formation provided a 2083 5 Ma SHRIMP U-Pb syndepositional
age (Hoori et al., 2005). The Oklo diagenetic uranium deposit at the FA-FB boundary has
been dated at 2050 30 Ma by using U-Pb method (Gancarz, 1978). Taken together, these
data indicate the depositional age for the Francevillian B Formation near 2100 30 Ma. This
is supported by the highly positive 13C values of the carbonate fraction of the FB2 black
shales (Fig. S1), the range of which (+5.5 to +9.6) is consistent with deposition during
the ~2.22-2.10 Ga Lomagundi seawater positive carbon isotope excursion (Bekker et al.,
2008).
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 2
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
8/37
2 - The site and the macrofossils
Figure S2 | a, The Francevillian B2 site outcropping near the town of Franceville, Gabon. b,The transition between the cemented sandstone beds and the black shales. c, The 5 m-thick
finely-laminated fossiliferous black shales. Scale bar, 50 cm.
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 3
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
9/37
Figure S3 | Black shale bedding surface bearing macrofossils from the FB2 levelphotographed in situ. The disparity of spatially close and serially repeated forms is evident.
Scale bar, 10 cm.
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 4
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
10/37
Figure S4 | a, Black shale surface from the FB2 level bearing macrofossils. In this case,density approximates 40 specimens/m2. b, c, d, Details showing the disparate orientation of
differently sized and shaped structures (as indicated by arrows). The surface is locally coated
with iron oxides. Contact deformation of the surrounding black shale sediment with the
structures is occasionally seen. Scale bar, 10 cm.
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 5
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
11/37
Figure S5 |Macrofossil specimen (G-FB2-f-mst1.3) from the FB2 Formation. a, Lower sideof the specimen (top) with its counterpart (impression) left in the black shales (bottom). b,
Micro-CT-based 2D reconstruction (volume virtually rendered in coloured semi-transparency;
for technical informations, see section 3 below) showing peripheral radial fabric. Scale bars, 1
cm.
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 6
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
12/37
Figure S6 | Macrofossil specimen (G-FB2-f-mst2.4) from the FB2 Formation. a, Lower sideof the specimen (right) with its counterpart (left) showing peripheral radial fabric and folded
appearance. b, Micro-CT-based 2D (left) and 3D (right) virtual reconstructions showing radial
fabric and the inner fold pattern. c, Longitudinal section running close to the estimated central
part of the specimen evidencing the extent of the central fold. Scale bars, 1 cm.
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 7
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
13/37
Figure S7 | Macrofossil specimen (G-FB2-f-mst2.2) from the FB2 Formation. a, Lower (right)and upper (centre) sides of the specimen with its counterpart (left) showing wrinkled
appearance and, to a minor extent, peripheral radial fabric (notable on the lower side). b,
Micro-CT-based 2D (left) and 3D (right) virtual reconstructions showing radial fabric and a
particularly complex inner fold pattern. c, Longitudinal section evidencing the multiple,heterogeneous folds. Scale bars, 1 cm.
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 8
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
14/37
Figure S8 | Macrofossil specimen (G-FB2-f-mst3.10) from the FB2 Formation. a, Upper sideof the specimen showing peripheral radial fabric and folded appearance. b, Micro-CT-based
2D (left) and 3D (right) virtual reconstructions showing radial fabric, folds, and the pyrite
concretion filling the central part. c, Longitudinal section evidencing the fold pattern and the
position of the pyritic body. Scale bars, 1 cm.
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 9
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
15/37
3 - Microtomography (micro-CT and SR-micro-CT)
The macrofossils have been studied by means of high-resolution microtomography (micro-
CT) at the Centre de Microtomographie of the University of Poitiers, France. The equipment
used, a X8050-16 Viscom AG (1004x1004 camera), is a multi-scale X-ray inspection
system which allows the analysis of variable sized objects up to a diameter of 300 mm.
Depending on the specimens, scan parameters were 100 to 120 kV, 0.5 to 0.8 mA current,
1500 to 1800 views, 32 integrations by view, 16-bit tif images. Reconstructions have been
done at theEtudes Recherches Matriaux company (www.erm-poitiers.fr) using the software
DigiCT v.2.3 (Digisens) 64-bit version running on a 2.5 GHz Dell T7400 Precision Windows
XP 64 workstation with 32 GB of DDR RAM and two NVIDIA graphic cards (Quadro FX
5600 and Telsa C870). This workstation allows using of the Digisens acceleration plug-ins for
tomographic reconstruction, SnapCT, which takes advantage of the GPU processing
capabilities. The final volumes were reconstructed in 992x992 formats with isotropic voxels.
The spatial resolution varied from 17 to 83 m3. Virtual sections, 3D rendering and
animations (see the attached four movies produced by A.Ma.) were performed by means of
AVIZO v.5 (Mercury Computer Systems Inc.) 64-bit version.
Two specimens (G-FB2-f-mst1.1 and mst3.8) have been also studied by means of
synchrotron radiation X-ray microtomography (SR-micro-CT) at the tomography station of
the Materials Science beamline (TOMCAT;
http://sls.web.psi.ch/view.php/beamlines/tomcat/index.html) of the Swiss Light Source set at
the Paul Scherrer Institute (http://www.psi.ch/), Villigen, Switzerland. In order to optimize the
signal-to-contrast ratio, the X-ray energy was set at 40 keV, because of the mineral
composition (e.g., mostly pyrite; Fig. S15). The magnification of the X-ray microscope was
10x or 20x. On-chip binning (2x) was selected to improve the signal-to-noise ratio for the 20x
scans. The projections (1001 or 1501, depending on magnification; 550 to 700ms exposure
time) were made over 180, and thus online post-processed and rearranged into flat- and
darkfield-corrected sinograms. Reconstructions were performed on a 16-nodes Linux PC farm
using highly optimized filtered back-projection routines. The reconstructed voxels are
isotropic and have a size of 0.74 m.
Topographic thickness variation has been assessed on the most suitable specimens along
geometrically homologous (usually "parasagittal") virtual sections. The results provide a
coherent pattern of symmetrical structural heterogeneity. Two examples are shown in Figs. S9
and S10.
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 10
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
16/37
Figure S9 | Micro-CT-based topographic thickness variation (in m) and cross-sectionaloutline assessed along three virtual sections (different colours) parallel to the main axis in the
specimen G-FB2-f-mst1.1. Note the close pattern shown by the two lateral sections (blue and
red) and the distinct outline of the thicker intermediate section (green) running closer to the
central part of the fossil. Scale bars 5 mm.
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 11
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
17/37
Figure S10 | Micro-CT-based topographic thickness variation (in m) and cross-sectionaloutline assessed along two virtual sections running through the central part of specimen G-
FB2-f-mst2.4. The external profile of the specimen suggests an inwards compaction of the
original structure involving one of its two long margins. Note the resemblance between the
two profiles and the relative position, shape and extent of the two folds. Scale bars, 5 mm.
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 12
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
18/37
Figure S11 | Micro-CT-based imaging of the structural fold patterns shown by seven selectedspecimens from the FB2 Formation (axial virtual sections). a, G-FB2-f-mst2.1. b, G-FB2-f-
mst2.2. c, G-FB2-f-mst2.4. d, G-FB2-f-mst3.1. e, G-FB2-f-mst3.2. f, G-FB2-f-mst3.4. g, G-
FB2-f-mst3.10. Scale bars, 5 mm.
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 13
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
19/37
Figure S12 | SR-micro-CT-based 3D reconstruction of a lateral portion of a specimen fromthe FB2 Formation (G-FB2-f-mst.3.8) showing radial microfabric. The long axis of the
investigated sample (from upper left to lower right) is approximately parallel to the long axis
of the specimen. The upper and lower surfaces of the sample correspond to the two opposite
surfaces of the specimen; the other surfaces (two cylindrical and two flat) are artificial,
formed by the boundaries of the SR-micro-CT scan. Note the distribution of the octahedral
pyrite crystals and their absence in a sediment-filled area forming narrow slits through the
structure. Crystal size decreases towards periphery. Scale bar, 100 m.
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 14
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
20/37
4 - Composition of macrofossils
Textural relations between a pyritized sheet and the sediment
A section normal to bedding (Fig. S13) capturing the microstructure of the shale matrix
shows that the shale laminae are draped around the folds of the pyritized sheet. This confirms
that the structures are pre-compactional folds rather than features formed during late
diagenesis.
Figure S13 |Section of a specimen from the FB2 Formation (G-FB2-f-mst2.6) normal tobedding, photographed in reflected, plane-polarized light. a, Complete section of the pyritized
sheet showing general relationships between folded sheet and shale lamination. b, Detail of
fold concavity showing that shale laminae do not transverse into sheet structure. Scale bars,
2.5 mm.
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 15
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
21/37
X Ray Diffraction
As shown in Figure S14a, three samples were extracted from the host sediment (1) and
from the edge (2) and the centre (3) of a pyritic body of a specimen from the FB2 Formation
(G-FB2-f-mst2.1). The clay fraction was concentrated using centrifugation after gentle
grinding. XRD patterns were obtained from randomly-oriented powders (Fig. S14b) and
oriented preparations (Fig. S14c) using a PANalytical XPert diffractometer (Ni-filtered Cu-
K radiation) equipped with accelerator detector (2 2 analysis angle). Analytical conditions
were as follows: 40 kV, 40 mA; 0.020 2 scanning step 45 sec counting time per step; 2.5-
65.0 2 and 2.0-30.0 scanning angular ranges for randomly oriented powders and oriented
mounts, respectively. As seen in Table S1 (below), there is no significant difference in clay
mineralogy between the three sampled spots.
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 16
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
22/37
a
0
400
8001200
1600
2000
2400
2800
3200
3600
4000
4400
4800
5200
5600
6000
6400
6800
7200
7600
8000
84008800
9200
9600
10000
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Position (2*thta)
Intensit(cps)
-4,2
6
Qz
-14,2
0
Ch
-10,0
0
I
-7,0
8C
h
-3,5
5
Ch
-3,1
3
Py
-2,7
1
Py+G
-2,5
8
C+I
-2,2
5
C+I
-2,2
1
Py
-1,8
0
Py+Go
-1,5
6
Py+Go+C
-1,5
0
Py+Go+C
-4,1
8
Go
-2,4
2
Py
-1,9
1
Py+G
-1,8
2
Q+C
-1,6
3
Py
-10,6
0
ML
-5,0
1
I
-3,3
4
Qz
-1,6
9
Go
-1,4
5
Py+Go
-4,7
2
Ch-4,4
9
I
-3,7
2
Do
-2,5
8
Ch+I
-2,4
5Q
-1,7
2
Go
-2,4
5
Go
-3,2
0
I
-2,9
9
I
-2,8
9
Do
-2,2
8
Q
-2,1
9
Do
-1,5
4
Q+Do
-2,1
2
Q
-1,9
8
Q-1,8
2Q
+Ch
-1,67
Q
-1,4
5
Q-1,8
2Q
+
Ch
-2,0
2
Do
-1,7
8
Do
-1,6
6
Q+Ch
-1,4
9C
h+I+D
o
1
2
3
b
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
2800
3200
3600
4000
4400
4800
5200
5600
6000
6400
6800
7200
7600
8000
8400
8800
9200
9600
10000
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Position (2*thta)
Intensit(cps)
-
4,2
6
Qz
-
14,2
0
Ch
-
10,0
0
I
-
7,0
8C
h
-
3,5
5
Ch
-
3,1
3
Py
-
4,1
8
Go
-
10,6
0
ML
-
5,0
1
I-
3,3
4
Qz
-
4,7
2
Ch
1
2
3
-
3,3
34
I
c
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 17
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
23/37
Figure S14 | Mineralogical composition of the samples extracted from the pyritized body andits host sediment of specimen G-FB2-f-mst2.1 from the FB2 Formation. a, Sampled sites; 1:
host sediment (arrow indicates the counterprint of the specimen); 2, edge; 3, central part of the
specimen. Scale bars, 1 cm. b, XRD patterns of randomly oriented powders. c, XRD patterns
of oriented preparations in the air-dried state. Chlorite (Ch), Illite/Smectite mixed-layer (ML);
Illite (I); Quartz (Q), Goethite (Go), Pyrite (Py), Dolomite (Do).
sediment
(see Fig.
14a-1)
specimen
(see Fig. 14a-2-3)
edge centre
bulk mineral components (see Fig. 14b)
Quartz ++++ +++ ++Pyrite ++ ++
Goethite + ++
Dolomite +
Chlorite ++ ++ ++
mixed-layer (Illite/Smectite) + + +
Illite + + +
phyllosilicates of clay fraction (see Fig. 14c)
Chlorite +++ +++ +++
mixed-layer (Illite/Smectite) ++ ++ ++
Illite +++ +++ ++
Table S1 | Mineralogical composition of the G-FB2-f-mst2.1 specimen from the FB2Formation. Relative quantities are appreciated using the intensity of the representative XRD
peaks.
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive Analysis System (EDX)Beside the structural investigations performed at infra-micrometric level by means of SR-
micro-CT (Fig. S12), the mineral composition of the specimens, notably at the level of their
periphery, has been analysed at the Department of Geosciences at the University of Poitiers
by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) JEOL 5600 LV equipped with an Oxford
energy dispersive analysis system (EDX). The content of major elements has been normalized
using silicate standards. Analytical conditions were 15 kV, probe current 6.10-10 A.
An example of SEM-EDX results (specimen G-FB2-f-mst2.1) is provided in Fig. S15.
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 18
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
24/37
Figure S15 | SEM-EDX analysis of the lobate outer edge of a specimen from the FB2Formation (G-FB2-f-mst2.1) showing radial microfabric. a, General view (left) and details of
the areas within (lobe) and between (sediment) two lobate peripheral structures. b, Elemental
composition of the lobe showing high content of sulphur (S) and iron (Fe). c, Elemental
composition of the intermediate zone filled by clayey sediments.
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 19
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
25/37
Secondary Ionization Mass Spectrometry (SIMS)
Specimen G-FB2-f-mst4.3 was mounted in a 25 mm epoxy disc, coated with 30 nm gold
and inserted into the ion microprobe sample holder together with pre-polished and coated
pieces of sulfide standards (Crowe & Vaughan, 1996): Ruttan pyrite (34SCDT = +1.2 ),
Balmat pyrite (34SCDT = +15.1 ), and an in house mass independently fractionated
standard, 248474, from the Isua greenstone belt (34SCDT = +2 ; 33S =+ 3.2 ). S isotopes
(32S, 33S and 34S) were analysed using a Cameca IMS1270e7 (SIMS) located at the Swedish
Museum of Natural History, Stockholm (NordSIMS facility). Analytical methods and
instrument parameters were similar to those used by Whitehouse et al. (2005) and Kamber
and Whitehouse (2007). Briefly at +10 kV, ca. 2 nA Cs+ primary beam was operated in
critical focussing (Gaussian) mode with a 5 m raster to generate a ca. 10 m diameter
analytical area. The primary beam was operated together with a normal incidence electron
flooding gun for charge compensation, -10kV secondary beam, software (Cameca CIPS
version 5) automated centering of field aperture and simultaneous detection in three Faraday
detectors at an effective mass resolution of ca. 4500 on the 33S channel, sufficient to resolve
33S from 32S1H. The NMR field controller was utilised to ensure reproducibility of the
secondary ion signal during the analytical session.
The pyrite isotope standards were analysed several times, bracketing analyses of sulfides
of unknown isotopic composition, with the Ruttan pyrite used as the primary standard and the
other two standards as monitors. External precision on the 34SCDT values is ca. +0.6 (2 std
deviations) based on the Ruttan standard analyses. The results are shown in Tab. S2.
Sample ID32
S cps34
S/32
S sig % 34
SCDT 1 s.d.
(x106)
surrounding sheet material_2-1 740 0.042879 0.029 -27.39 0.32
surrounding sheet material_2-2 729 0.042876 0.030 -27.46 0.33
surrounding sheet material_2-3 730 0.042859 0.031 -27.85 0.34surrounding sheet material_2-4 739 0.042893 0.030 -27.07 0.33
surrounding sheet material_2-5 737 0.043027 0.028 -24.03 0.31
surrounding sheet material_2-6 748 0.043001 0.030 -24.63 0.33
surrounding sheet material_2-7 747 0.042850 0.030 -28.05 0.33
surrounding sheet material_2-8 753 0.042966 0.025 -25.42 0.28
surrounding sheet material_2-9 754 0.042874 0.028 -27.50 0.32
surrounding sheet material_2-10 714 0.042816 0.023 -28.81 0.27
surrounding sheet material_1-1 733 0.042881 0.029 -27.34 0.32
surrounding sheet material_1-2 746 0.042894 0.028 -27.05 0.32
surrounding sheet material_1-3 735 0.042858 0.026 -27.88 0.30
surrounding sheet material_1-4 605 0.042930 0.027 -26.23 0.30
surrounding sheet material_1-5 733 0.042845 0.026 -28.15 0.29
surrounding sheet material_1-6 738 0.042883 0.029 -27.30 0.32
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 20
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
26/37
surrounding sheet material_1-7 758 0.042955 0.027 -25.68 0.30
surrounding sheet material_1-8 739 0.042863 0.028 -27.76 0.32
surrounding sheet material_1-9 738 0.042861 0.027 -27.81 0.31
surrounding sheet material_1-10 717 0.042889 0.027 -27.16 0.31
surrounding sheet material_1-11 725 0.042900 0.027 -26.91 0.30
surrounding sheet material_1-12 702 0.042817 0.026 -28.79 0.30
surrounding sheet material_1-13 691 0.042785 0.026 -29.52 0.30
surrounding sheet material_3-1 802 0.042858 0.025 -27.88 0.29
surrounding sheet material_3-2 749 0.042904 0.022 -26.83 0.26
surrounding sheet material_3-3 738 0.042912 0.029 -26.64 0.32
surrounding sheet material_3-4 745 0.043023 0.027 -24.12 0.30
surrounding sheet material_3-5 760 0.043020 0.026 -24.18 0.30
surrounding sheet material_3-6 750 0.043012 0.028 -24.38 0.32
surrounding sheet material_3-7 741 0.043014 0.027 -24.32 0.31
central pyrite nodule_1-1 736 0.044267 0.025 4.10 0.29
central pyrite nodule_1-2 738 0.043833 0.029 -5.76 0.32
central pyrite nodule_1-3 744 0.043559 0.028 -11.97 0.31
central pyrite nodule_1-4 761 0.043452 0.027 -14.40 0.30central pyrite nodule_1-5 738 0.043386 0.028 -15.90 0.31
central pyrite nodule_1-6 732 0.043343 0.028 -16.86 0.31
central pyrite nodule_1-7 731 0.043270 0.028 -18.52 0.31
central pyrite nodule_1-8 727 0.043270 0.030 -18.52 0.33
central pyrite nodule_1-9 727 0.043093 0.030 -22.54 0.33
central pyrite nodule_1-10 707 0.043232 0.030 -19.38 0.33
central pyrite nodule_2-1 647 0.043269 0.032 -18.54 0.35
central pyrite nodule_2-2 717 0.043012 0.025 -24.37 0.29
central pyrite nodule_2-3 726 0.043126 0.031 -21.79 0.34
central pyrite nodule_2-4 732 0.043040 0.028 -23.73 0.31
central pyrite nodule_2-5 738 0.043141 0.023 -21.44 0.27
central pyrite nodule_2-6 954 0.042895 0.014 -27.03 0.20central pyrite nodule_2-7 745 0.043052 0.027 -23.47 0.31
central pyrite nodule_2-8 748 0.043026 0.027 -24.05 0.31
central pyrite nodule_2-9 745 0.043063 0.028 -23.21 0.31
central pyrite nodule_2-10 738 0.042857 0.034 -27.89 0.37
central pyrite nodule_3-1 756 0.044589 0.025 11.40 0.29
central pyrite nodule_3-2 749 0.044295 0.026 4.73 0.30
central pyrite nodule_3-3 742 0.044084 0.027 -0.06 0.31
central pyrite nodule_3-4 737 0.043795 0.027 -6.62 0.31
central pyrite nodule_3-5 726 0.043405 0.028 -15.46 0.31
central pyrite nodule_3-6 716 0.043255 0.031 -18.87 0.34
central pyrite nodule_3-7 725 0.043345 0.027 -16.81 0.31
central pyrite nodule_3-8 726 0.043549 0.027 -12.20 0.30
central pyrite nodule_3-9 735 0.043975 0.025 -2.53 0.29
central pyrite nodule_3-10 741 0.044301 0.027 4.87 0.31
central pyrite nodule_3-11 746 0.044572 0.028 11.02 0.31
central pyrite nodule_4-1 700 0.044059 0.028 -0.62 0.31
central pyrite nodule_4-2 724 0.043944 0.028 -3.23 0.32
central pyrite nodule_4-3 735 0.043753 0.028 -7.57 0.32
central pyrite nodule_4-4 746 0.043458 0.014 -14.25 0.20
central pyrite nodule_4-5 752 0.043313 0.028 -17.54 0.32
central pyrite nodule_4-6 754 0.043017 0.019 -24.26 0.24
central pyrite nodule_4-7 751 0.042876 0.030 -27.46 0.33
central pyrite nodule_4-8 752 0.042970 0.025 -25.33 0.29central pyrite nodule_4-9 739 0.042889 0.027 -27.17 0.31
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 21
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
27/37
central pyrite nodule_4-10 731 0.043004 0.027 -24.56 0.31
central pyrite nodule_5-1 626 0.044195 0.033 2.27 0.38
central pyrite nodule_5-2 676 0.044005 0.029 -2.04 0.34
central pyrite nodule_5-3 685 0.043718 0.027 -8.56 0.33
central pyrite nodule_5-4 693 0.043520 0.028 -13.04 0.33
central pyrite nodule_5-5 703 0.043374 0.028 -16.35 0.34
central pyrite nodule_5-6 711 0.043279 0.029 -18.50 0.35
central pyrite nodule_5-7 728 0.043221 0.026 -19.81 0.32
central pyrite nodule_5-8 733 0.043142 0.024 -21.61 0.30
central pyrite nodule_5-9 608 0.043968 0.017 -2.88 0.26
central pyrite nodule_5-10 576 0.043063 0.032 -23.42 0.37
central pyrite nodule_5-11 624 0.043158 0.032 -21.26 0.37
central pyrite nodule_5-12 654 0.043223 0.032 -19.77 0.37
central pyrite nodule_5-13 646 0.043321 0.039 -17.55 0.43
central pyrite nodule_5-14 687 0.043152 0.027 -21.39 0.33
central pyrite nodule_5-15 695 0.043153 0.027 -21.36 0.33
central pyrite nodule_5-16 701 0.044723 0.021 14.23 0.28
central pyrite nodule_5-17 733 0.043439 0.026 -14.89 0.32central pyrite nodule_5-18 728 0.043060 0.024 -23.47 0.31
central pyrite nodule_5-19 680 0.043650 0.014 -10.09 0.23
central pyrite nodule_5-20 467 0.043262 0.034 -18.89 0.39
central pyrite nodule_5-21 621 0.043104 0.028 -22.48 0.34
central pyrite nodule_5-22 678 0.043132 0.027 -21.84 0.33
central pyrite nodule_5-23 688 0.044086 0.032 -0.21 0.38
central pyrite nodule_5-24 689 0.044355 0.026 5.89 0.32
central pyrite nodule_5-25 695 0.043106 0.028 -22.43 0.34
central pyrite nodule_5-26 697 0.043416 0.030 -15.39 0.35
central pyrite nodule_5-27 696 0.043323 0.025 -17.51 0.31
central pyrite nodule_5-28 706 0.043254 0.027 -19.07 0.33
central pyrite nodule_5-29 704 0.043284 0.027 -18.40 0.33central pyrite nodule_5-30 696 0.043304 0.030 -17.94 0.36
central pyrite nodule_5-31 700 0.043495 0.029 -13.61 0.35
central pyrite nodule_5-32 706 0.043642 0.027 -10.28 0.33
central pyrite nodule_5-33 710 0.043880 0.028 -4.87 0.33
central pyrite nodule_5-34 717 0.044159 0.025 1.46 0.31
central pyrite nodule_5-35 714 0.044263 0.027 3.80 0.33
central pyrite nodule_5-36 729 0.044421 0.026 7.39 0.32
central pyrite nodule_5-37 725 0.044571 0.026 10.78 0.32
central pyrite nodule_5-38 724 0.044681 0.025 13.30 0.31
surrounding sheet material_4-1 723 0.042950 0.026 -25.98 0.32
surrounding sheet material_4-2 718 0.042933 0.029 -26.35 0.34
surrounding sheet material_4-3 453 0.042918 0.013 -26.70 0.23
surrounding sheet material_4-4 736 0.042931 0.028 -26.39 0.34
surrounding sheet material_4-5 697 0.042815 0.018 -29.02 0.26
surrounding sheet material_4-6 721 0.043065 0.028 -23.35 0.33
surrounding sheet material_4-7 733 0.042931 0.027 -26.40 0.33
surrounding sheet material_4-8 726 0.043036 0.027 -24.03 0.33
surrounding sheet material_4-9 723 0.043050 0.025 -23.70 0.32
surrounding sheet material_4-10 703 0.042923 0.026 -26.59 0.32
surrounding sheet material_4-11 467 0.042789 0.009 -29.63 0.21
central pyrite nodule_6-1 662 0.042955 0.029 -25.86 0.34
central pyrite nodule_6-2 703 0.042927 0.034 -26.49 0.39
central pyrite nodule_6-3 684 0.043084 0.025 -22.93 0.31central pyrite nodule_6-4 692 0.043056 0.027 -23.56 0.33
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 22
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
28/37
central pyrite nodule_6-5 657 0.043564 0.025 -12.05 0.31
central pyrite nodule_6-6 677 0.043336 0.026 -17.21 0.32
central pyrite nodule_6-8 699 0.044268 0.021 3.92 0.28
central pyrite nodule_6-9 697 0.042924 0.028 -26.57 0.34
central pyrite nodule_6-10 702 0.042978 0.027 -25.34 0.33
central pyrite nodule_6-11 704 0.044503 0.023 9.25 0.29
central pyrite nodule_6-12 551 0.043590 0.021 -11.45 0.28
central pyrite nodule_6-13 710 0.043084 0.026 -22.94 0.32
central pyrite nodule_6-14 712 0.043125 0.025 -22.00 0.31
central pyrite nodule_6-15 723 0.043093 0.027 -22.72 0.33
central pyrite nodule_6-16 723 0.043208 0.028 -20.12 0.34
central pyrite nodule_6-17 719 0.043065 0.024 -23.37 0.30
central pyrite nodule_6-18 712 0.043185 0.023 -20.65 0.30
central pyrite nodule_6-19 675 0.044654 0.028 12.66 0.34
central pyrite nodule_6-20 704 0.043583 0.023 -11.62 0.30
central pyrite nodule_6-21 671 0.043557 0.047 -12.20 0.51
central pyrite nodule_6-22 697 0.043270 0.025 -18.72 0.31
central pyrite nodule_6-23 700 0.043327 0.024 -17.42 0.30central pyrite nodule_6-24 699 0.043305 0.026 -17.91 0.32
central pyrite nodule_6-25 689 0.043292 0.025 -18.22 0.31
central pyrite nodule_6-26 706 0.043371 0.038 -16.42 0.43
central pyrite nodule_6-27 704 0.042915 0.028 -26.77 0.34
central pyrite nodule_6-28 600 0.043549 0.006 -12.39 0.20
central pyrite nodule_6-29 704 0.043561 0.026 -12.12 0.32
central pyrite nodule_6-30 689 0.042987 0.030 -25.13 0.36
central pyrite nodule_6-31 685 0.043567 0.028 -11.98 0.34
Table S2 |34S values (average 1 s.d.) obtained by means of Secondary Ionization MassSpectrometry (SIMS) on a longitudinal section running through the central part of a specimen
from the FB2 Formation (G-FB2-f-mst4.3) and sampling at 150 sites its central pyrite nodule
and the surrounding sheet material, till the marginal edge of the specimen (see also Fig. 5 in
the main text).
Mass Spectrometry
Five fossilized specimens from the FB2 Formation and their associated host shale sediment
were analysed for 13C content at the Institute for Geology and Geochemistry (IGG),
Stockholm University (courtesy of H. Sigmund). The average results are shown in Tab. S3.
Sample ID 13
C () 13
C () diff. ()
sediment specimen
s1 -27.83 -33.32 5.49
s2 -28.97 -34.65 5.68
s3 -32.72 -33.35 0.63
s4 -11.74 -27.16 15.42
s5 -22.44 -30.77 8.33
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 23
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
29/37
Table S3 |13C values ( V-PDB) measured on five specimens from the FB2 Formation andtheir associated host shale sediment.
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 24
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
30/37
5 - Criteria of biogenicity
Figure S16 | Micro-CT-based axial virtual sections showing the inner structural organizationof a specimen from the FB2 Formation compared with a non-biological object. a, A pyrite
sun formed by radially growing crystals similar to colloform pyrite texture (rev. in Barrie et
al., 2009). b, The peripheral radial fabric and the central folds characterizing the specimen G-
FB2-f-mst2.1. Scale bars, 1 cm.
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 25
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
31/37
Criteria of antiquity
A Structures must occur in rocks of known provenance (in situ)
B Structures must occur in rocks of established age, ideally dated directly by radiometric techniques
C Structures must be indigenous and syngenetic with the primary fabric of the host rock, i.e., they m
physically embedded within the rock, not introduced by post-depositional fluids
D Structures should not occur in high-grade metamorphic rocks
E The geological context of the host rock must be well understood at regional scale
F Fossils should not be significantly different in colour from that of the rock matrix
G There should be evidence for organo-sedimentary interaction
Criteria of biogenicity
H Structures should exhibit biological morphology that can be related to extant cells, structures or activities
I More than a single step of biology-like processing should be evident. These steps may take the form of :
biominerals
geochemical fractionations of isotopes (sulphur and
specific organic comJ Structures should occur within a geological context that is plausible for life, i.e., at temperatures and pr
that extant organisms are known to survive
K - Structures should fit within a plausible evolutionary context
L - Structures should be abundant and ideally occur in a multi-component assemblage. Ideally they should sho
colonial/community behaviour
Table S4 | Condition shown by the 2.1 Ga FB2 black shales outcropping near Franceville, Gabon, and their fowith respect to some among the most common criteria considered to assess antiquity and biogenicity (adapted
criteria ranging from "fully met condition" (+++) to "condition not met" (), through "uncertain condition" (~condition mostly met; + = condition partly met.
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
32/37
6 - Geochemical and isotopic data (bulk sediment)
Total organic carbon content and carbon isotopes
The origin of the organic matter (OM) cannot be identified from the bulk data obtained
from Rock-Eval pyrolysis because of the high maturity of the samples. Several authors have
inferred algal and cyanobacterial origins for organic matter in the black shales of the FB
Formation (Cortial et al., 1990; Mossman et al., 2001). A contribution from cyanobacteria
and marine algae to the OM of the FB Formation is also supported by biomarkers (Dutkiewicz
et al., 2007). Notably, a eukaryote signature indicated by steranes has been proposed to be
responsible for very high OM content in the FB Formation (Dutkiewicz et al., 2007).
The total organic carbon (TOC) content (wt. %) of three samples from the lower sandstone
beds of the FB2 unit and 10 samples from the laminated black shales of the FB2 fossiliferous
horizon are shown in Tab. S5.
Carbon isotopic values for 10 black shale samples are shown using standard notation in
units of relative to V-PDB standard in Tab. S5. The 13C values of the carbonate fraction
(13Ccarb) were measured on CO2 released by reaction of 50 to 300 mg of fine-grained powder
with 100% H3PO4 at 50C (Stable Isotopes Laboratory, Department of Geosciences at the
University of Rennes 1). H2S released during reaction between sulphide grains and H3PO4
was eliminated by reaction with Ag3PO4 at ca. 60C for 5 minutes. Isotopic measurements
were done on a VG Sira 10 triple collector mass spectrometer. Repeated analyses of internal
lab standard Prolabo Rennes gave a mean 13C value of -9.720.03 (1s, n=14), close to the
accepted value of -9.692. No correction was added to the measured values, and the
analytical uncertainty is estimated lower than 0.1. The studied carbonate-containing rocks
are characterized by carbonate content between 2.9 and 11.4 wt. % and 13Ccarb values
between +5.5 and +9.6 V-PDB (Fig. S1c), which are typical for marine carbonates
deposited during the 2.22-2.10 Ga Lomagundi seawater positive carbon isotope excursion
(Schidlowski et al., 1975; Bekkeret al., 2008).
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 27
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
33/37
Sample
13
Ccarb
( V-PDB)
TOC (wt. %)
(rock-eval)
carbonate
(wt. % carb)
(calcimetry)
FB9-02 0.12 0
(sandstone)
FB9-04 0.39 0
(sandstone)
FB9-06 0.39 0
(sandstone)
FB9-08 7.3 2.30 2.9
FB9-09 6.8 1.79 6.4
FB9-10 5.6 3.41 8.2
FB9-11 5.6 1.98 10.0
FB9-12 5.9 2.00 11.4
FB9-13 7.0 3.41 5.2
FB9-14 5.5 2.20 7.1
FB9-15 6.5 2.12 7.4
FB9-16 9.6 2.47 3.3
FB9-17 6.1 1.72 8.4
Table S5 |13Ccarb values ( V-PDB), total organic carbon (TOC, wt. %), and carbonatecontent of samples from the FB2 section (cf. Fig. S1c).
Isotopes of sulphurThe
34S composition of bulk rock, was measured at the Nordic Center for Earth Evolution
at the University of Southern Denmark, Odense, on Ag2S precipitates from 22 samples of the
sulphide that was liberated by the CRS method (Newton et al., 1995; Lyons, 1997). About
200 g were added to a tin cup with V2O5 and combusted using a Thermo elemental analyzer
coupled via a Conflow III interface to a Thermo Delta V Plus mass spectrometer. Sulphur
isotope compositions are expressed as permil () deviations from V-CDT using the
conventional delta notation (Fig. S17) with a standard deviation of about 0.2.
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 28
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
34/37
Figure S17 |34S values ( V-CDT) measured on 22 samples from the lower (FB1) and theupper (FB2) parts of the Francevillian B Formation.
Iron
Iron speciation was investigated using the sequential extraction protocol (Poulton &
Canfield, 2005) and sulphide concentrations were determined by the chromium reduction
method (CRS) (Zhabina & Volkov, 1978; Canfield et al., 1986). The concentration of iron in
all iron fractions, except for pyrite, were measured by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS),
while pyrite content was estimated from the sulphide concentrations by Cr reduction
assuming a pyrite stoichiometry (Fe2S) in the sediment. Reproducibility was above 95% for
all phases but magnetite (Femag), where concentrations were close to zero and we consider the
error to be within the detection level of the AAS.
The highly reactive iron (FeHR) is considered to be the diagenetically active iron and is
defined as the sum of carbonate-associated iron (Fecarb), ferric oxides (Feox) and Femag, plus all
the iron that has been converted to sulphide phases in the water column or sediment (Fepy)
(Canfield et al., 1992; Poulton et al., 2004); so FeHR= Fecarb + Feox + Femag + Fepy. The highly
reactive iron is then related to total iron content of the sediment (FeT) to form a redox
indicator, as sediments deposited below an anoxic water column usually have a FeHR/FeT ratio
above 0.38 (Raiswell & Canfield, 1998; Poulton & Raiswell, 2002; Canfield et al., 2008). We
applied this iron speciation technique to 24 well-preserved rock samples. In our dataset there
are four samples with FeHR/FeT >0.38, indicating anoxia, while the other 20 samples are
consistent with oxygenated water-column conditions (Fig. S18). The analyzed samples were
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 29
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
35/37
not deposited by turbidities, which could distort an anoxic iron signal (Raiswell & Canfield,
1998), thus we interpret this sample set to have been deposited in a predominantly oxic
environment.
FeHR/FeT
0,00
0,10
0,20
0,30
0,40
0,50
0,60
0,70
FB2 FB1
Figure S18 | Ratio of highly reactive to total Fe (FeHR/FeT) measured in 24 samples from thelower (FB1) and the upper (FB2) units of the Francevillian B Formation.
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 30
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
36/37
Cited references
Barrie C.D., Boyce A.J., Boyle A.P., Williams P.J., Blake K., Ogawara T., Akai J. & Prior D.J. 2009.
Growth control in colloform pyrite.Am. Mineral. 94, 415-429.
Bekker A., Holmden C., Beukes N.J., Kenig F., Eglinton B. & Patterson W.P. 2008. Fractionation
between inorganic and organic carbon during the Lomagundi (2.22-2.1 Ga) carbon isotope
excursion.Earth Planet. Sci. Letters271, 278-291.
Bros R., Stille P., Gauthier-Lafaye F., Weber F. & Clauer N. 1992. Sm-Nd isotopic dating of
Proterozoic clay material: an example from the Francevillian sedimentary series, Gabon.Earth and
Planet. Sc. Letters113, 207-218.
Canfield D.E., Poulton S.W., Knoll A.H., Narbonne G.M., Ross G., Goldberg T. & Strauss H. 2008.
Ferruginous conditions dominated later Neoproterozoic deep-water chemistry. Science321, 949-
952.
Canfield D.E., Raiswell R. & Bottrell S. 1992. The reactivity of sedimentary iron minerals towards
sulfide.Am. J. Sci. 292, 659-683.
Canfield D.E., Raiswell R., Westrich J.T., Reaves C.M. & Berner R.A. 1986. The use of chromium
reduction in the analysis of reduced sulfur in sediments and shales. Chem. Geol.54, 149-155.
Cortial F., Gauthier-Lafaye F., Lacrampe-Couloume G. Oberlin A. & Weber F. 1990. Characterization
of organic matter associated with uranium deposits in the Francevillian formation of Gabon (lower
Proterozoic). Organic Geochem.15, 73-85.Crowe D.E. &Vaughan R.G. 1996. Characterisation and use of isotopically homogeneous standards
for in situ laser microprobe analysis of 34S/32S ratios.Am. Mineral. 81, 187-193.
Dutkiewicz A., George S.C., Mossman D.J., Ridley J. & Volk H. 2007. Oil and its biomarkers
associated with the Palaeoproterozoic Oklo natural fission reactors, Gabon. Chem. Geol.244, 130-
154.
Gancarz A.J. 1978. U-Pb age (2.05x109
years) of the Oklo uranium deposit. The Natural Fission
Reactors.IAEA Symp. Proc., Vienne, 513-520.
Hoori K., Hidaka H. & Gauthier-Lafaye F. 2005. U-Pb geochronology and geochemistry of zircon
from the Franceville series at Bidoudouma, Gabon. The 15th Annual Goldschmidt Conference.
Moscow, Idaho, USA.
Kamber B.S. & Whitehouse M.J. 2007. Micro-scale sulphur isotope evidence for sulphur cycling in
the late Archean shallow ocean. Geobiol. 5, 5-17.
Lyons T.W. 1997. Sulfur isotopic trends and pathways of iron sulfide formation in upper Holocene
sediments of the anoxic Black Sea. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta61, 3367-3382.
Mossman D.J., Gauthier-Lafaye F. & Jackson S. 2001. Carbonaceous substances associated with the
Paleoproterozoic natural nuclear fission reactors of Oklo, Gabon: Paragenesis, thermal maturation
and carbon isotopic and trace element composition. Precamb. Research106, 135-148.
www.nat ure.com/ nat ure 31
-
8/2/2019 Abderrazak, et al
37/37
Newton R.J., Bottrell S.H., Dean S.P., Hatfield D. & Raiswell R. 1995. An evaluation of the use of the
chromous chloride reduction method for isotopic analyses of pyrite in rocks and sediment. Chem.
Geol. (Isot. Geosci. Sect.) 125, 317-320.
Poulton S.W. & Canfield D.E. 2005. Development of a sequential extraction procedure for iron:
implications for iron partitioning in continentally-derived particulates. Chem. Geol.214, 209-221.
Poulton S.W., Krom M.D. & Raiswell R. 2004. A revised scheme for the reactivity of iron (oxyhydr)
oxide minerals towards dissolved sulfide. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 68, 3703-3715.
Poulton S.W. & Raiswell R. 2002. The low-temperature geochemical cycle of iron: from continental
fluxes to marine sediment deposition.Am. J. Sci. 302, 774-805.
Raiswell R. & Canfield D.E. 1998. Sources of iron for pyrite formation in marine sediments.Am. J.
Sci. 298, 219-245.
Schidlowski M., Eichmann R. & Junge C.E. 1975. Precambrian sedimentary carbonates: carbon and
oxygen isotope geochemistry and implications for the terrestrial oxygen budget. Precambr. Res. 2,
1-69.
Wacey, D. Early Life on Earth. A Practical Guide (Springer, 2009).
Whitehouse M.J., Kamber B.S., Fedo C.M. & Lepland A. 2005. The importance of combined Pb and S
isotope data from early Archaean rocks, southwest Greenland, for the interpretation of S-isotope
signatures. Chem. Geol. 222, 112-131.
Zhabina N.N. & Volkov I.I. 1978. A method of determination of various sulfur compounds in sea
sediments and rocks. In (W.E. Krumbein, ed.)Env. Biogeochem. Geomicrob. v.3.Methods, Metals
and Assessment. Ann Arbor Science, pp. 735-745.
Movie 1 | Specimen G-FB2-f mst1.1.Movie 2 | Specimen G-FB2-f mst2.1.Movie 3 | Specimen G-FB2-f mst3.1.Movie 4 | Specimen G-FB2-f mst4.1.