aaron_cons_ahorro.pdf

26
Consumption-Savings Decisions and Credit Markets Economics 3307 - Intermediate Macroeconomics Aaron Hedlund Baylor University Spring 2013 Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 1 / 26

Upload: flowers

Post on 06-Nov-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Consumption-Savings Decisions and Credit Markets

    Economics 3307 - Intermediate Macroeconomics

    Aaron Hedlund

    Baylor University

    Spring 2013

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 1 / 26

  • Introduction

    So far, we have only looked at static consumer optimization orexogenously specified dynamic behavior.

    Now we look at intertemporal decisions.

    Just a few issues that we will investigate:I Consumption-savings decisions and investment behavior.

    I Ricardian equivalence and fiscal policy.

    I The determination of real interest rates.

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 2 / 26

  • A Two Period Model

    Two period endowment economy with endowments y1 and y2.

    Lump sum taxes t1 and t2.

    Real interest rate r .

    The consumers budget constraints are given by

    c1 + s1 = y1 t1c2 = y2 + (1 + r)s1 t2

    The lifetime budget constraint combines both constraints to equatelifetime wealth with the present value of consumption.

    c1 +c2

    1 + r= y1 t1 + y2 t2

    1 + r

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 3 / 26

  • A Two Period Model

    Time separable preferences U(c1, c2) = u(c1) + u(c2).I Standard assumptions: u > 0 and u < 0.

    The discount factor (0, 1) measures the households degree ofpatience.

    Consumers make consumption/savings decisions to maximize utility,

    maxc1,c2

    u(c1) + u(c2)

    subject to

    c1 +c2

    1 + r= y1 t1 + y2 t2

    1 + r

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 4 / 26

  • A Two Period Model

    Optimality conditions:

    u(c1)u(c2)

    = MRSc1,c2 = 1 + r

    c1 +c2

    1 + r= y1 t1 + y2 t2

    1 + r

    A lender if c1 < y1 t1 and a borrower if c1 > y1 t1.

    c 2

    c 2

    c2 c2

    c1 c1 y1 t1 y1 t1

    y2 t2

    y2 t2

    c1 c1

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 5 / 26

  • Comparative Statics: Changes in Current Income

    How do c1, s1, and c2 respond to changes in y1?

    c1y1

    =(1 + r)2u(c2)

    > 0

    c2y1

    =(1 + r)u(c1)

    > 0

    where = u(c1) (1 + r)2u(c2) > 0.

    Lastly,s1y1

    = 1 c1y1

    =u(c1)

    > 0

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 6 / 26

  • Comparative Statics: Changes in Current Income

    Consumers use part of the increase in y1 to augment consumptionand the rest to increase savings. Thus, c1 < y1.

    This behavior is called consumption smoothing.

    In the data, households smooth their consumption, but not by asmuch as theory predicts. Consumption exhibits excess variability.

    Possible reasons:1 Credit market imperfections.

    2 Consumer durables are more like investment.

    3 General equilibrium effects.

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 7 / 26

  • Consumption Variation

    Durable goods consumption is much more volatile than nondurablegoods/services because it is economically a form of investment.

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 8 / 26

  • Comparative Statics: Changes in Future Income

    How do c1, c2, and s1 respond to changes in y2?

    c1y2

    =1

    1 + r

    c1y1

    > 0

    c2y2

    =1

    1 + r

    c2y1

    > 0

    s1y2

    = c1y2

    < 0

    Consumers use a portion of the expected increase in future income toaugment consumption today (requiring a decrease in savings) and therest to augment consumption in the future.

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 9 / 26

  • The Permanent Income Hypothesis

    Consumers respond differently to temporary changes in income thanthey do to permanent changes in income.

    I Examples of temporary changes: unemployment, bonuses, etc.

    I Examples of permanent changes: occupation changes, disability, etc.

    The permanent income hypothesis states that consumers basetheir consumption decisions on their discounted lifetime income.

    W = y +y

    1 + r+

    y

    (1 + r)2+ = 1 + r

    ry

    Wtemp =

    (y + y +

    y

    1 + r+ . . .

    )W = y

    Wperm =

    (y + y +

    y + y

    1 + r+ . . .

    )W = 1 + r

    ry

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 10 / 26

  • Consumption Smoothing and the Stock Market

    Stock price movements are closer to permanent shocks, implying thatconsumption should respond noticeably to such changes.

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 11 / 26

  • Comparative Statics: Changes in The Real Interest Rate

    How do c1 and c2 respond to changes in r?

    c1r

    =u(c2) (1 + r)u(c2)(y1 t1 c1)

    c2r

    =(1 + r)u(c2) u(c1)(y1 t1 c1)

    s1r

    = c1r

    Substitution effects:

    c1r

    subst

    =u(c2)

    < 0,

    c2r

    subst

    =(1 + r)u(c2)

    > 0

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 12 / 26

  • Comparative Statics: Changes in The Real Interest Rate

    Income effects:

    c1r

    inc

    =c1r c1

    r

    subst

    =(1 + r)u(c2)(y1 t1 c1)

    c2r

    inc

    =c2r c2

    r

    subst

    =u(c1)(y1 t1 c1)

    The signs of the income effects depend on the sign of y1 t1 c1.

    The income effect of a higher real interest rate is negative forborrowers and positive for lenders.

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 13 / 26

  • Comparative Statics: Changes in The Real Interest Rate

    c1

    c 2

    c 2

    c1

    weL(1 + rL)

    weH(1 + rH)

    weH(1 + rH)

    weL(1 + rL)

    weL weL weH weH

    The effect of an increase in the real interest rate for a lender (left)and a borrower (right).

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 14 / 26

  • The Government

    Suppose the government levies lump-sum taxes T1 = Nt1 andT2 = Nt2 and issues initial debt B1 (S

    g1 = B1) to finance spending

    G1 and G2.

    The governments budget constraints are

    G1 = T1 + B1

    G2 + (1 + r)B1 = T2

    Substituting out for B1 gives the present-value government budgetconstraint

    G1 +G2

    1 + r= T1 +

    T21 + r

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 15 / 26

  • Competitive Equilibrium

    A competitive equilibrium in this economy consists of an interest rater , allocations for the household c1 and c2, and allocations for thegovernment G1, G2, T1, T2 such that:

    1 Consumption c1 and c2 solve the consumers optimization problem.

    2 The governments present-value budget constraint is satisfied:

    G1 +G2

    1 + r= T1 +

    T21 + r

    3 The credit market clears in the initial period (total savings S1 = 0):

    S1 Sp1 + Sg1 = Sp1 B1 = 0 Sp1 = B1where Sp1 = N(y1 t1 c1) and B1 = G1 T1.

    4 The goods market clears:

    Y1 = C1 + G1 and Y2 = C2 + G2

    where Y1 = Ny1, Y2 = Ny2, C1 = Nc1, and C2 = Nc2.

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 16 / 26

  • Walras Law

    Conditions (1), (2), and (3) automatically imply (4).

    c1 +c2

    1 + r= y1 t1 + y2 t2

    1 + r C1 + C2

    1 + r= Y1 T1 + Y2 T2

    1 + r

    Thus,

    Sp1 = Y1 T1 C1 = (Y2 T2 C2

    1 + r

    )Also,

    G1 +G2

    1 + r= T1 +

    T21 + r

    B1 = G1 T1 = (G2 T2

    1 + r

    )Credit market clearing Sp1 = B1 implies

    Y1 T1 C1 = G1 T1 and Y2 T2 C2 = G2 T2 Y1 = C1 + G1 and Y2 = C2 + G2

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 17 / 26

  • Ricardian Equivalence

    Suppose the government leaves G1 and G2 unchanged but reducesinitial period taxes by t1 =

    T1N per household.

    The deficit increases by T1 and the government must raise secondperiod taxes by T2 to pay back the increased debt:

    G1 = T1 T1 + (B1 + T1), G2 + (1 + r)(B1 + T1) = T2 + T2 G1 + G2

    1 + r= T1 T1 + T2 + T2

    1 + r

    Before the tax cut,

    G1 +G2

    1 + r= T1 +

    T21 + r

    Thus, the required tax increase is T2 = T1(1 + r).

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 18 / 26

  • Ricardian Equivalence

    What are the macroeconomic effects of this deficit-financed tax cut?

    The consumers intertemporal budget constraint becomes

    c1 +c2

    1 + r= y1 (t1 t1) + y2 (t2 + t1(1 + r))

    1 + r

    c1 + c21 + r

    = y1 t1 + y2 t21 + r

    Unchanged! The consumers original c1 and c2 are still feasible andoptimal.

    Private savings becomes Sp1,new = Y1 (T1 T1) C1= Y1 T1 C1 + T1 = Sp1 + T1.

    National saving is (Sp1 + T1) (B1 + T1) = Sp1 B1 = 0. Thus,the credit market is still in equilibrium without requiring a change in r .

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 19 / 26

  • Ricardian Equivalence

    Summary:I Holding r fixed, increased household saving exactly offsets decreased

    public saving, leaving national saving unchanged.

    I Equilibrium c1, c2, and r are unchanged.

    I The true tax burden is the discounted value of government spending.Deficits are just deferred taxes.

    SP + T1

    SP

    1

    1

    B1 + T1 B1

    r

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 20 / 26

  • Assumptions of Ricardian Equivalence

    Ricardian equivalence relies on four assumptionsI Taxes change by the same amount for all households, i.e. it is not the

    case that certain households receive the initial tax cuts and differenthouseholds pay the future tax increases.

    I The increased government debt is paid off during the lifetimes of thepeople alive when the debt was issued.

    I Lump-sum taxation.

    I Perfect credit markets.

    Real world example: the income tax withholding reduction in 1992-93.

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 21 / 26

  • Government Deficits and Debt

    Government deficits in the U.S. and in Europe.

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 22 / 26

  • Government Deficits and Debt

    Government debt to GDP ratio in the United States.

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 23 / 26

  • Can the Government Run a Perpetual Deficit?

    Consider the following scenario:I GDP growth rate g : Yt = Y0(1 + g)

    t .

    I Permanent primary deficit dt Gt Tt = dYt a fraction d of GDP.

    I Constant real interest rate r .

    From the governments per period budget constraint,

    Gt + (1 + r)Bt1 = Tt + Bt Bt =dt=dY0(1+g)t

    (Gt Tt) +(1 + r)Bt1 Bt = dY0(1 + g)t + (1 + r)

    {dY0(1 + g)

    t1 + (1 + r)[dY0(1 + g)

    t2 + . . .]}

    Bt = dY0[(1 + g)t + (1 + r)(1 + g)t1 + (1 + r)2(1 + g)t2 + + (1 + r)t]

    BtYt

    =Bt

    Y0(1 + g)t= d

    [1 +

    1 + r

    1 + g+

    (1 + r)2

    (1 + g)2+ + (1 + r)

    t

    (1 + g)t

    ]

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 24 / 26

  • The Arithmetic of Perpetual Government Deficits

    The debt/GDP ratio is therefore

    BtYt

    = dt

    n=0

    (1 + r

    1 + g

    )n= d

    1 + g

    g r

    [1

    (1 + r

    1 + g

    )t+1]

    If r > g , BtYt in the long run, which is impossible.

    If r < g , BtYt d1+ggr in the long run.

    Example: r = 0.01, g = 0.03, d = 0.05I Long run debt/GDP of d 1+ggr = 2.575.

    I Annual (primary deficit + debt service)/GDP of d + rd 1+ggr = 0.07575.

    I These calculations assume that the world is willing to purchase all ofthis debt at interest rate r .

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 25 / 26

  • European Sovereign Default Crisis

    Interest rates in Europe.

    Econ 3307 (Baylor University) Consumption-Savings Decisions Spring 2013 26 / 26

    HouseholdsThe GovernmentCompetitive EquilibriumRicardian EquivalencePerpetual Government Deficits