a wanderer's way

8/14/2019 A Wanderer's Way

1/111


2/111

A Wanderers way is a collection of thoughts or concepts investigated by the author. It is

shared with you, the reader, with the possibility of helping you along your path of learning.

With that said however, The title A Wanderers way suggests two things, the first being it was

written by or for wanderers. The second is that the text offers a way or path. With regards

to the first suggestion, both are only possibly correct. If we define a wanderer as an individual

who has wandered into this realm and as such is searching for an understanding or meaning to

this realm, then it is possible the author may fit this category and it is possible the reader may

also. The reader may consider as appropriate. Such a title or label as wanderer may be used as

there are those who this text is not for. This is not because the text is intended in any way to be

exclusive. It is a simple case that there are those who simply do not fit the category, that is, they

do not seek such knowledge, or perhaps refuse it in some way. Whatever the case or reasons it

is their choice and they may change such a choice in time. Perhaps ironically the text does

investigate why such individuals may not have the characteristics of seeking and how they may

develop or reclaim such characteristics. The second suggestion of a way is partially correct.

It is correct in the sense that the text is intended to be both sufficient to live by or work with, and

functional enough to be both practical mentally and physically. It is incorrect in the sense that it

is an incomplete way, or rather it is open ended. With application and analysis it may become

self evolving rather than a static system or way. These aspects are considered in greater detail in

the text.Lastly some suggestions for reading. There are limitations to language and limitations or

inabilities on both the authors and the readers part. Whilst care has been taken to try to ensure

an exactness to the writing so as to convey concepts as clearly as possible, there will perhaps

always be some loss or inaccuracies in the conveyance of concepts to the reader. As such it is

suggested that time be taken to attempt to understand concepts rather than skimming quickly

through the text. It is still possible with this in mind for the reader to obtain an overview or to

look at specific parts of the text by skipping through or selecting specific parts. However to gain

a fuller understanding of the text, a more detailed look will likely be required along with

applicable patience.

The text is not designed, nor could it be complete. The primary reason for this lies in change. Itwould be closer to say it is a work in progress. What is intended for the reader is more akin to a

guidebook which the reader may use to test or as a stepping stone for their own investigations.

This is a lifelong process. It is suggested that in this way the reader develop their own

guidebook, if not in text, at least in thought, which may utilize any parts of this text, none at all

with or without editing. This if done would be helpful to others, particularly in comparison to

others whom have done the same. On the other side it would be unhelpful to edit this text and

share it as newly developed by the self. Correction of the errors made by the author are

welcome, however in sharing, it is advised this text is shared as is complete as per the original

whilst any edited or self developed text or thoughts are shared separately. In other words correct

errors or make additions, but keep the original, regardless of any determined errors or lack, so

that any other individual may compare and study both the original and new for themself. This

also allows the observation of how one understanding in original form may lead to an improved,clearer understanding in the future. It is the concept rather than the longevity of the text which

is of importance.

Wander forth, for all paths lead home in time.


3/111

CONTENTS

From Control to Freedom 5Control 6

Pathways for control 8

Defined pathways

Examples of pathways 11Methodology of control 17

Examples of control methods

Further considerations of control 28

Freedom 30

Pathways for freedom 32

Defined pathways

Progress towards freedom 36

I 37I (Self) 38

Polarization 47

Steps 48

Aspects of I 54

Gazing into the pool 56

Dark side of I 61

Light side of I 63

Ebb and flow of lightness and darkness 64

Personalities

Progress 65

Formation of percepts

Generation of thoughts and emotions 68

Emotions and feelings 69

Aspects of being 73The endless maze, the unperceived illusion

I and I 79The self and other self 80

Percepts 81

Understanding 83

Identity 85

Interactions 86

Learning/teaching

Progress 88

Interactions with aspects of pathways for control 90Immunity 92

Transferences 93

Negatively oriented interactions 96

Positively oriented interactions 98


4/111

Collective I 99Societies 100

Progress 102

Unity 103

Momentum 104

The Collective 105

Cosmic I 107Cosmos 108

Nature

Division

Change

Knowledge

Exploration 109

Mystery

Resonance

Duality

LearningTime 110

Unity


5/111

FROM CONTROL TO FREEDOM


6/111

CONTROL

Control may be defined as basically anything which hinders, limits or constrains an entity or

many entities. Its purpose is for consumption and for learning. Reasons for control however

may be anything one deems to be a reason, be they truthful or fictional. Two examples of

reasons are: For entertainment. Entertainment primarily serves as pleasure which provides

consumption. The form of which the entertainment takes is a matter of creation which islearning. For your own good. This is a delusion in the sense that one cannot determine the

ultimate affect control will have on another. They may predict and they may perceive any

outcome as good but since it is impossible to know where the entity to be controlled still

retains individual consciousness, it is a delusion. The reader may note this example and see

which pathways (see proceeding text) are active in terms of an individual controlling themself to

maintain such a delusion.

An entity out of balance or promoting/providing imbalance (by choice for example) will tend to

draw or pull others toward imbalance. Thus imbalance provides catalyst for further imbalance.

In the case of imbalance momentum may be greatly desired. As desire increases, imbalanceincreases creating an exponential rate of constriction.

Both absence and excess may be used to control. One form of control may be used to establish

or enhance another form of control. Needs and desires be they illusory to any degree or not may

also be utilized for control. The possibilities are likely limitless, however a breakdown for

analysis may be helpful. This allows firstly the identification of control and possible control

both of the self of the self, of others to the self, of the self to others and of others to others.

Finally the concept of control may be seen to be a limited one, even if it contains some universal

validity. It is worth keeping in mind that for this reason, this text itself offers an avenue for

control not intentional, but by the reader upon the reader or upon one reader to another.

To notbe limiting is to be limitless, therefore any concept or groups of concepts or philosophy

in itself needs to remain open if it is to remain limitless. It may contain universal validity, buteven such, to be free from control and thus allow freedom, needs to be open to question,

consideration and contemplation at the least, otherwise it changes from limitless to finite - with

limit. In this way, thefearof being controlled or what may be interpreted as control, including

through an individuals understanding of the concept/word may be an avenue for control,

primarily by the self over the self.

In terms of interactivity, control tends to fortify itself and to adapt or recreate itself where

necessary. How it does this is a matter of creativity and learning. In an individual for instance

control may tend to fortify itself first by denying identification. That is, an individual may deny

that they control themself. If identified, the control may attempt to convince the individual that

it is necessary for one reason or another or many. It is also this perception just exemplified ofcontrol being either something external to the self or being an additional aspect of the self which

allows for certain rationalization as well as the demand that control itself must be controlled or

eliminated. This aspect or a similar aspect, depending on definitions and perceptions of the

concept has been called for one thing, the ego. What the reader wishes to name any such aspect

of themself is their choice, this text considers not the label nor the aspect itself, but the

characteristics, the purpose, the manufacture and the relinquishment of what is currently being

called control. As for the consideration of the mind and the origin of thoughts, this too is

analyzed in proceeding text.


7/111

When a form of control is identified and/or opposed or relinquished it may either change form to

attempt again to control an entity or if the pathway or form has become obsolete, a new pathway

will need to be developed. Reasons for a pathway of control becoming obsolete extend

primarily from the controlled individual(s) learning of the control and either opposing or

rejecting it as they choose. The reader may see at this point that both control in the form of

opposition for example can eliminate or disrupt another pathway for control by another entity.

However, it essentially only serves to replace or nest the control with a different or new control.

This is also an example of control changing form. As discussed in later text, control cannot be

controlled.

If an entity under control with under being an optimal use of language in the sense it may

indicate an hierarchy of controller to the controlled learns of the way in which they are being

controlled, their is potential for the control to lose its power and thus become redundant. The

control needs to either change form or be replaced. The options to do either of these are for the

controlled entity to make the change/replacement themself, for the controlled entity to be led or

influenced into making the change/replacement or for the change/replacement being fed orforced to/onto the entity. This learning by both the controller and the controlled forms an

evolution. It is this expansion of knowledge which actually attempts to ultimately constrict

which facilitates change that may proceed at an exponential rate. It may be noted that the

methods used to control may be cyclical in that either alternating between methods or utilizing a

set pattern of methods may suffice.

It may also be noted that in order to maximize control effectiveness, a task of primary

importance to the controller is to inhibit and/or limit the cognitive ability of the one to be

controlled to the extent that prevents recognition of the control and thus opposition or

relinquishment, whilst maintaining sufficient cognitive ability for any necessary purposes of the

controller.

An example of maintaining sufficient cognitive ability of the individual to be controlled may bewhen a task that is intended to be performed by the controlled individual is no longer able to be

performed due to a breakdown in mental or cognitive ability. Thus for the controller, the

situation requires further control so that the individual being controlled may have the ability, the

desire or other requirement in order that they perform the task or be controlled as originally

planned.


8/111

PATHWAYS FOR CONTROL:

Ultimately the number or ways to control another are limitless. If a control may be deemed

successful or even partially successful depends upon those to be controlled. Therein lies the

power of the individual for all pathways for control essentially begin and end with the self. The

pathways to control of another are threefold. This is because there may be seen to be 3 entities

interacting, although the third may be in potential. The three are the one wishing to control, theone to be controlled and what we may call the environment which may actually be the

environment, or another entity or entities. So with this in mind we may see the one intending to

control may work directly, indirectly through the environment or indirectly by effectively

leading the one to be controlled into controlling themself. Either way, remember the goal is for

the benefit of the one seeking to control.

Defined pathways:

1. Alteration of perceptionThis pathway of control is aimed at creating and/or distorting an entitys view of

their perceived reality and/or perception of any given concept or topic.

[A] Adaptation

Control may take the form of having an entity adapt without question or

complacently accept their current state of being and/or future states of

being. The states are possibly more likely to be negative that is the

conditions or state of the entity being controlled or their environment is

progressively getting worse however they may also be positive. In this

latter case Illusion or falsity (false gifts) may also be active.

[B] IllusionIllusions as a pathway for control can be seen to be more than alteration

of perception. But in terms of perception, there is the alteration of the

environment, alteration of another entity (including the one intending to

control) and there is the creation of a sub illusion (or sub reality, fictional

story etc) which may then alter the controlled entitys perception of either

themself, their environment including others entities.

[C] FalsityThis pathway of control could have been grouped with illusion. It may be

seen to be illusion by inference that is the illusion is essentially self

generated by the one being controlled.

[D] Difference

This pathway of control seems to take the form of a dividing line. A

difference or division is perceived and thus allows for any number of

distortions to be implemented or allowed to flourish. Ultimately this form

of control is through limitation.


9/111

2. Alteration of understandingThis pathway of control is aimed at distorting current knowledge/understanding

of the controlled entity, including the addition of distorted/incorrect/meaningless

knowledge for purposes of confusion or dilution, or subtraction of knowledge

which may aid the entity or be perceived to be a potential aid by the one

attempting to control.

[A] Direct

A direct alteration or distortion of a current understanding, including

removal/forgetting. This includes all forms of programming.

[B] Inversion

The intention with this pathway is to take the current knowledge and

convert its meaning to the opposite of what it was previously. Confusion

may be the intended outcome.

[C] Dilution

This pathway intends to muddy the pool with information which may

contain elements of truth/helpfulness/usefulness but usually contains amajority of the opposite elements. The more that is added, the more

diluted the pool of information becomes. The information may be that

which is being received by the entity, that which is being sent or that

which is stored (memory). Disinformation falls under this method as

well as bombardment or excess information inflow.

[D] Limitation

Any barrier set up to prevent or hinder expanding upon a current

understanding or as yet unknown/undiscovered piece of knowledge.

Limitation of awareness is included here as well as limitation of attention.

3. Alteration of the physical entityControl in this form is aimed at altering or limiting in some way the physical

body. In particular the functioning of the physical body which directly

inhibits/alters the mind or the capability of the entity to utilize its mind.

[A] Physical needs/desiresThese include such as food intake, exercise, intimacy but may also be

additional or become excessive or addictive. It also includes physical

aspects which may be accessory or not required for survival.

[B] Direct (Body complex)

This is straight alteration of the physical body.

[C] Direct (Body/mind complex)

This is alteration of any portion of the body which affects directly the

functioning of the mind of the entity.


10/111

4. Alteration of an entitys environmentThe environment may be seen to include the entity or entities attempting to

control if necessary. In this way the control of the entity to be controlled stems

from controlling that which is around the entity to be controlled. Thus all the

methods outlined for controlling an entity may be applied to the environment,

with some obvious exceptions depending on what the environment consists of.

[A] Time

This form of control is an option, however see alteration of perception of

time and alteration of the physical with respect to lifespan and

functionality.

[B] Space

Alteration of the physical space in which the entity dwells, resides or

visits.

[C] Physical/chemical environment.

Alteration of all other aspects of an entitys environment if the

environment is being defined as that which does not have thecontrollability of another entity or equivalent.

[D] Connection(s)

This involves the alteration or limitation of an entitys connection or

dependence on any part of its environment, including other entities. It

also involves the creation of systemized ties/dependencies.

[X] Nested control (see advanced concepts for additional information)

5. Alteration of communication

Whilst perception is defined here as that which an entity interprets of its externalenvironment including other entities, communication is any available means to

transfer/receive information from the environment or other entities, excluding the

information received via perception.

[A] Direct

This pathway is aimed at altering how communication takes place,

eliminating or limiting it either one way or both ways (input and output)

[B] Medium

This may be alteration or limitation of language or the form of

communication.

All pathways are provisional in that all situations are unique, all understanding and truths may

be seen to be spectral rather than correct or incorrect or probable/possible. However, the

readers understanding of truth, understanding, correctness, distortion and the like may be used

for understanding the text. It may be interesting for the reader to note the control and freedom

of ones mind is present even as one reads this book, just as it was when it was written. In

particular, the pathway of communication (book and words/ language) is already in play as this

book is currently written/read.


11/111

Examples of pathways

Simple examples:

1. Alteration of perception

[A] AdaptationAn entity (person) is introduced to a new law which prevents them from

leaving their home after a particular time at night. The entity cannot do

certain activities previously done outside the home after the set time, but

adapts to the new situation by altering their schedule.

[B] Illusion

An entity reads a fictional novel or watches a fictional film. This is a sub-

illusion example. This in itself is only potential control, unless pathways

to control are utilized within the film or book or by reading the book or

watching the film another pathway is being utilized (such as the limitation

of time). Even if no pathways to control are active, the potential pathway

may still be the alteration of perception by the nature of a sub-illusion.

[C] FalsityAn entity dreams up another entity which instructs the dreaming entity

what to do or think.

[D] Difference

An entity perceives a difference in another entity which may be irrelevant,

but is not perceived as such.

2. Alteration of understanding

[A] Direct

1. An entity is programmed with the understanding that it must serve,

replacing the previous, possibly less distorted understanding that serving

was optional.2. An entity understands its thoughts to be beneficial to its being when

they may not be.

[B] Inversion

1. An entity perceives power in the hands of many is potentially

dangerous, therefore power in the hands of few is ideal is adopted as a

new understanding.

2. An entity receives information directly opposite to the currently held

understanding. The entity may accept the new understanding or be

confused.

[C] Dilution

An entity holds a given understanding, but is given several new

understandings on the same issue/topic/concept and thus is unsure if itshould discard the new, adopt the new, merge the new with the old,

discard all or other.

[D] Limitation

An entity understands that an offering shall only be made to those which

the entity perceives as deserving of such offering.


12/111

3. Alteration of the physical entity

[A] Physical needs/desires

The entity is altered to require additional food intake for general being.


The height of the entity is altered.


The brain chemistry of the entity is altered via electromagnetic induction.

4. Alteration of an entitys environment

[A] Time

The entitys environment increases in rate of change.

[B] Space

An entity is confined to a small room void of light.

[C] Physical/chemical environment.

Various chemicals are introduced to an entitys immediate environment

[D] Connection(s)

All entities apart from the entity to be controlled are altered in form. The

entity to be controlled loses (a perceived) connection with the newly

formed entities.

5. Alteration of communication[A] Direct

1. An entity adopts a new form of communication with greater limits than

the previously used one.

[B] Medium

2. The language used by an entity is morphed to the point where the

words/symbols/concepts are less understood collectively by all those

communicating.

Combination examples

1. 1.[D][B][C] Difference + Illusion/Falsity

An entity views a given situation as either being one way or another,

wrong or right when in actuality the situation is variable over time within

a set or unlimited spectrum.

2. 4.[C][D] Physical/chemical + Connections

An entitys environment is damaged via chemicals which in turn creates

feelings of lack of connection or a (perceived) necessarily generatedconnection to the environment by the entity.

3. 3. [A][B][C] Needs/desires + Body complex + Mind/body complex

An entity ingests a particular chemical on a regular basis which in turn

alters its brain chemistry, altering the capacity of the entitys thought

which in turn alters the body complex of the entity.


13/111

Complex integrated examples

1. Overview:

An initial group of entities are programmed with an understanding of a perceived

problem which must be corrected for the well being of those with the perceived

problem. In this case the problem is the risk of disease. The solution

generated by the group involves altering the body complex of those deemed to be

at risk of the proclaimed disease. The group to be treated in this case have

divided in two. Those that have accepted the understanding and hence accept the

treatment and those that reject the understanding of treatment but adopt an

inverted understanding of the necessity for correction by the initial group. This

third group rejects the proposed solution then protests. The situation remains

open for further control.

Breakdown:

2. [A][D] Direct + Limitation, 1.[B] Illusion

The initial group is directly controlled as well as controlled by limitation with the

understanding of a perceived problem and the understanding that they must fix

such problem and by doing so they will be helping the other entities. The illusion

is the perceived problem which contains sub illusions or distorted understandings

of risk and disease. Note this may also be seen as a nested control in that the

distorted understandings of risk and disease are created first and then used

unknowingly within another pathway to control.

2. [A][D] Direct + Limitation, 1.[A] Adaptation, 3. [B] Body complex,

possibly 3.[C] also.

The newly formed group which accepts the treatment: Understandings from the

initial group are transferred to this group. This may be seen to be adaptation.

Limitation may be seen to be the understanding of the option presented is the

only option or only perceived viable option. This control may have been presentpreviously or adopted from the initial group. The treatment then alters the body

and possibly body/mind complex. This in itself may or may not be control,

depending on the alteration of course. An example would be if the treatment had

negligible or nil effect on the group. It is also possible in the scenario that the

treatment provided some benefit. Also note a dependency may have been created

in that the group to be treated now may depend upon the initial group for further

treatments.

(Breakdown continued)

2. [A][B][D] Direct + Inversion + Limitation, 1. [D] DifferenceThe newly formed group which rejected treatment: Some understandings from

the initial group may have been transferred whilst the understanding of the

necessity of treatment is inverted to become no treatment is necessary. This

inversion of the understanding may actually purify the understanding or it may

control in another way via limitation that is, no help is required, it was the only

option, the first group can no longer be trusted, etc. The provisions to what

control is ultimately generated from the scenario depends also on other

understandings, perceptions and awareness of the entities involved. An example

of difference in perception as a control pathway in this scenario is the third group


14/111

defining the treatment as right or wrong. Then with the protesting, the

distorted understanding is thrust upon others and the pathways to control

continue.

Additional:

Within this scenario control may be considered interlinked. The initial group

attempts to control another group, of which some are controlled more than others.One group out of the divided group then attempts to control others (via

protesting).

Examples of possible resultant control:

4. [D] Connections, 1. [D] Difference

The groups may now perceive differences in each other which

may generate further control by altering understanding. For

example, the protesting group may see the initial group as

untrustworthy and the group who were treated as gullible orfoolish. Both the initial group and the treated group may see the

protesting group as disturbances or troublemakers or similar.

So there may be disruption or alteration to the connections

between the groups and/or there may be alteration to the perceived

differences of the groups.

4. [C] Physical/chemical

The treatment, be it applied to the treated group or not is a

possibility for further control of the chemical/physical

environment. An exception to this may be if the treatment has no

possibility of residue.

5. [A] DirectThe changes that may take place by the three groups may also

affect communication. An example being one group refusing or

limiting communication to another group likely due to alteration

in connections and perceived differences.


15/111


16/111

Additional:

The reader may note from this scenario that control may not always be direct or

intended by the participants, although the pathways or possible pathways may

still be present.

Possible additional pathways include alteration of connections between all

entities, alteration of communication, the alteration of the environment and

perceptions of either the environment or other entities.

Advanced Concepts of control:

Nested control:A pathway within a pathway. A simple example using the illusion pathway would be an

illusion within an illusion. Any pathways may be combined and the level of nesting is

essentially limitless.

Sequential control:

Utilizing one pathway or simply a suitable event for creation or accretion of another

pathway. This in turn may be used for another ad infinitum.

Hierarchical control:

Utilizing any pathway or form of control on others which in turn control others in an

hierarchical structure, ad infinitum.

Interdependent control:A situation where one entity is dependent on another or any number of entities, either

real or perceived/illusory, which may be controlled and/or allow for further/greater

control.

Compounding control:

Similar to sequential control, however the pathways used do not have to be in sequenceor with the same entity. A simple example of compounding control is control which is

automatically passed from a parent to their children.

All of these concepts may be combined.


17/111

METHODOLOGY OF CONTROL

Ultimately the methods used to control are unlimited. Essentially any method must be pre-

thought in linear time and as such, creativity - being a fundamental aspect of thought - allows

any method to be used, as well as those methods to adapt, evolve and combine with other

methods. There is also the study of the individual(s) to be controlled to establish which

pathways or how the individual(s) may accept/reject an attempt to control and proceeding(re)actions. Thus attempting to control is essentially a learning process, just as is the seeking to

escape/avoid control. This alone is indicative of the importance of control/freedom with

respect to progress of an entity. It is also integral to teach/learning or helping.

With this in mind examples of possible and observed methods of control utilizing the previously

defined pathways are shown below.

Examples of control methodsSimple examples:

1. Aim: Create a sense or feeling of self doubt in an entity.

Chosen method: 1. Utilize or create a perceived difference in the physical

appearance of the entity to other entities. 2. Reinforce or amplifythe perception via alteration/distortion/limitation of the

understanding of the entity. This activity takes place by generator

feedback which alters the perception. (Concepts detailed further in

proceeding chapter)

3. Create or add the physical desire for the entity to alter its

physical appearance.

Pathways used: 1.Perception, Difference

1.Environment, Nested control either alteration or use of

existing differences in physical body. Alteration

could be the use of cosmetics for example.

2.Understanding, Direct

3.Physical, Desire

2. Aim: To create or amplify warlike thought forms in an entity.

Chosen method: 1. Create or use an existing sub-illusion which involves the entity

having a goal of generating peace by destroying an enemy. The

concept of peace being obtainable by violence is programmed,

likely by bypassing the entitys perception of such.

2. Amplify by repeating, via levels, and alternative sub-illusions

utilizing same goal/concept.

3. Apply the same situation or opportunity for such a situation in

the external environment.

4. Utilize chemical additives which the entity may ingest or come

in contact with which promote violent tendencies.

Pathways used: 1. Perception, Illusion

1. Perception, Inversion

1. Understanding, Direct

2. Understanding, Dilution excess specifically

3. Environment, Nested control A situation is either

present or previously generated which holds the opportunity for

further programming.


18/111

4. Environment, Chemical

4. Physical, Direct body/mind complex

3. Aim: Create an emotional tie to a particular topic for future

manipulation

Chosen method 1. Create interlinked distorted understandings. In this case the

entity believes that another entity supporting a particular

viewpoint is barbaric or at least incorrect in their thinking, which

must be corrected.

Pathways used: 1. Understanding, Direct (interlinked)

Combining methods and pathways by integrated example with simultaneous analysis:

All Entities have a designation by a letter. Example >AA< is a middle aged man who lives with his family; >B< his wife and >C< his young boy. >AB< has a passion for

nature and does not see herself as religious in anyway and nor do others. >C< is young and

learning, he has not chosen any particular path but he is rebellious to both parents.

It is early morning.

Finish your breakfast commands >A< to his son >CC< to comply may not elicit any change in

>A< or action taken by >A< .But in this scenario which of course is unique to these individualsfor the purpose of example, we have the following: [Alteration of perception [A] and [D] by

>CA< being the environment with respect to >CC< may or

may not have taken place. If it is the first time such a thing was said to >C< or the way in

which it was said or any additional body language for example, there is alteration. If it or

similar has happened before but perhaps only once or twice, there is a compounding affect.

Note also adaptation to the perception of the situation may take place. In the mind of >CC< does as

ordered. 2. The command is accepted, but adaptation has either not taken place or is rejected.

3. The command is rejected, an adaptation may or may not take place at this time.

The triad outlined in the proceeding chapter may be recalled here: 1. Perception, 2. Awareness

and 3.Generator (thought). In the case of >ACC< may

dislike being told what to do, but his reasoning negates that and any ill effects are perceived to

be non-existent or negligible.

So control is not intended by >A< but is present without his awareness of its presence. It might

be seen to be working through him. Basically the pathways for such control to take place are


19/111

the perception of >A< towards >CC< has heard similar commands previously, not for his breakfast, but for other things such as

washing his hands before eating. He is also aware of the language used it is not a question or a

suggestion, but a direct command to do something. Though he does not actively think of it, his

underlying understanding is that father or not, he has no right to order him what to do.

He is also aware or perceives the possibility of his father getting angry if he shows via body

language or verbally any refusal.

So for now he accepts the command, but there is change within his mind, even though there is in

this instance, none or negligible change in the mind of >AC< in this

scenario, he perceives the statement and the act of making the statement as a command as

something which is against him, which is brought about by his understanding of the

situation/event. Additionally his perception is changing with each time a similar event occurs

that is the command from his father in his case it is moving towards further rejection of the

command. Recall that control cannot be removed or eliminated by control. Alongside the

alteration in his perception, the understanding of >C< is being cemented or amplified if youlike, largely due to the fact it is not being challenged by his conscious mind that is most of the

output of the generator is from the unconscious portion of the mind in this case.

Now at the same time >C< carries a latent fear of possible anger from >AA< has used it previously in the life of >C< to control >C< - that is

to have him to do what >A< wanted him to do. ( There is more, which will be evident later in the

scenario) So there are two pathways for control which are crossing. The crossing of pathways

affords the possibility of both pathways being diminished or one pathway being diminished or

negated. In the case of >CC< and >B< (his mother). >BB< prepare her breakfast, although he has seen it before, >C< asks rhetorically: What

do you drink that stuff for?

In this scenario, it was not a simple question nor one without any intention behind it (aside fromregular curiosity and learning that is). The rhetoric is in the intention that is there is an

underlying intention to sway control by inference. Inference is listed as an advanced

pathway to control (see previously in the text). The question, including in this case the way it is

said, is inferring that drinking that stuff is unacceptable or unusual or a similar word with

the same prefix. This inference is derived from a common understanding of the tonal variations

on the words used in speech.

Begin with perceptions. Firstly both >C< and >B< have adapted to this form of communication

and have adopted the same understanding of the form of the communication. However, >B


20/111

perceives it as hurtful to her in this case and when used on others as a possible attack on them.

>C< is aware of the concept of it being an avenue for attack on others, but in this case at least,

he does not perceive it as being as such and nor does he perceive the hurt felt by his mother.

In this case there is no direct intentions from either >B< or >CB< simply returns the

answer of Because its healthy.

Further Analysis: In the scenario thus far >C< played a part in two situations where pathways

for control were evident. The reader may observe the possibility of sequential control being

present, though not likely utilized directly. This takes the form of a temporary emotional change

in >CABAA< is at work. >A< works at a company which

employs approximately 30 people, of which >D< is one. In the morning, >A< observes >DD< requests help for a work task from

>AA< refuses to help, but does not offer any reason nor any

sign to >D< as to why he has refused.

Here, >A< is utilizing an awareness of the incident with >D< to effectively control >DA< regarding >DD< and the employee>D< was unkind to, it may also be a more complete picture on the nature/behavior of >DD< for example. 2. >A< is limiting

awareness and thus understanding of >D< by intentionally with-holding knowledge of why he is

refusing to help. This is related to pathways 4[D] and 5[A]. 3. Limitation is present in the

concept by which >A< is refusing help. In this case it is also inverted 2[B] from the

understanding of >DB< has some experiences which are worth

considering. In her home she reads a newspaper which advertises a charity event. This event

involves those taking part to purchase a wearable token, with the money from the purchase

advertised as going towards research for a cure for a disease. >B< decides she will take part.

Since there are numerous pathways, some possibly quite obvious to the reader at this point, only

a few have been selected for consideration. In particular, there is the absence of knowledge

pertaining to what actually happens to the money which is received from the charity event. In


21/111

this scenario, part of the money is being used for research, however it will be research which

will be used to develop new pharmaceutical drugs to suppress symptoms of those with the

disease. Any new drugs which are developed in this case will likely incur a considerable fee to

those with the disease as well as multiple side affects. Aside from the lack of awareness of the

activities and intentions of those running the charity and the pharmaceutical and research

connections (and control) >B< has developed first a distorted concept that she is helping, of

which there may be seen to be minimal, whilst in reality she has helped to increase the control of

others indirectly. Pathways in use include 1[A], 1[B], 2[A], 2[B], 2[D], 3[B], 3[C], 4[C].

One more event in the day of >C< is the task of going to school.

It is not the concept of learning itself that acts as a pathway for control, but the structure and

content primarily that opens pathways.

Alteration of the perception and understanding, including all eight pathways listed are the most

recognizable ways control may take form. Since the school itself or more accurately those

running the school have no awareness of such pathways and/or have such an understanding that

acknowledgement would be denied, control is not from the school itself, but acts through the

school.

The reader may consider other possible pathways the schooling offers or examine in detail theways in which the perceptions and understandings are altered in the school, as well as the

perceptions, understanding and awareness the teachers and those running the school must have

in order for the pathways to be active. It may be worthwhile to explore what a school actually is

as well as its set-up as to the nature of the pathways which result.

With the analysis of all the preceding examples, the idea is not to get bogged down or

absorbed with the details and complexity. What the analysis provides and allows is a mapping

out of the way in which control and self servitude is facilitated firstly by the self, secondly

between individuals in small, local groups and thirdly on the larger scale between groups of

societies and a civilization. The mapping out of the details allows for a greater understanding

and awareness of the reality when analysis of such details has ceased and the larger picture isagain being focused on.

Later, >A< returns home where he communicates the event previously mentioned of not helping

>D< to his wife >BA< in communicating the event provides also a particular bias to the event. This is done

by a choice selection of portions of the story to tell as well as particular words which determine

the concepts used by >B< in interpreting the event. Perhaps a particular slant was used to

portray >D< in the story. Perhaps an aspect of the story was missing such as the seeming

unkindness of >A< refusing to help >D< as may be perceived by >DA< and/or those that are, are justified within his mind via theunderstandings he holds. So aside from actually occurred between >A< and >DBA< (such as an intonation or

emphasis) as well as (less readily considered) the omissions. For the most part all of this is not

considered consciously by >A


22/111

conversation. Regardless, it is the underlying percept(s) and understanding(s) which are passed

to >BB< as to what degree those percept(s) and

understanding(s) are adopted if they are at all. Most importantly to note here is that the current

understandings, awareness and percepts of >B< will determine what will occur next. There is

possibility for protection from adoption of any distorted percepts or understandings, there is

possibility of unknowingly adopting the same or similar percepts or understandings as >AA< and >B


23/111

This may also be programmed as progress toward a utopia. The monetary system also allows

for nested hierarchies to be set up based on the quantity of money and perceived or illusory

value of the tasks and items which gain money for an individual. Other factors determining the

positions for hierarchy may be perceptions of the body complex and education. These may be

dependent on money also.

The next step is to facilitate trading of resources using the monetary system between the groups.

This may also be done under the guise of progress. Meanwhile, the groups must still protect

their land from the other groups. It is both the progress and the protection from another group

which will continuously build greater infrastructure. Protection of course, may be more

effective in perceptions of fear of attack. All of this infrastructure creates an imbalance

between the group and their environment and eventually all the groups and their collective

environment. This is a pathway for future control. For now though, the infrastructure as well as

the societal interdependencies of the individuals is built up.

At this stage a basic system of control is in place due to a monetary system which builds

interdependencies, growth and utilization of power (exerted primarily through money). By this

stage, it is more controlling for the rulers if all land within a given group is owned by individuals

and the rulers of the group, or offering greater control, if all land is owned by the rulers of thegroup only. With sufficient interdependencies and control over basic resources including land,

the system becomes self propagating.

The final step is to introduce a common enemy to all the groups so that they will unite under one

leadership, at which point the original rulers, or those directly under them may be revealed to the

populous. One choice for the common enemy could be the environment, since the requirements

for resources and land area would likely have disrupted the environments balance. Again, it is a

situation of imbalance, brought about from control which will be stabilized, albeit temporarily,

via greater control.


24/111

Example of methods and pathways of controlling a planetary civilization by integrated

example with simultaneous analysis:

1. Create the perception/illusion of the need to control. This involves the concept of oneruling over another, for their protection, for their well being, to prevent conflict, to direct

the collective pathway. Utilize the parent/children relationship and the mankind/nature

relationship as methods for convincing a natural (perceived) hierarchy.

If outright ruling is not accepted, then partial ruling. Let the people have a say or play

their part in the decisions. Gradually reduce the part they play if allowed and/or

introduce the illusion that they are playing their part/having their say. Create false

hands or voices, create individuals or groups which speak for the people. Create two or

more opposing sides which whilst opposing each other or at least appearing to do so,

promote or continue the planned agenda.

The conceptual understanding once held allows the percept to remain. Protection for

example may be extended to the acceptability of removing the freedom of another

individual in order to (seemingly) maintain said protection. The concept of freedom,

with the addition of security and protection (both distorted) is inverted to actually

produce control. The individual(s) of course believe they are somehow working towardsfreedom. If it is their concept of freedom then indeed they are their concept having a

basis in control. All of the pathways via understanding are utilized, perhaps with the

exception of dilution, which then allows all the pathways via perception. It may be noted

that the pathways active via alteration of perception consequentially allow for further

alteration or distortion of understanding. The use of power, the illusion of power,

opposition, progress and the like are all straight forward ways in which to control or

build control. In a society, those that have the least awareness and knowledge and whom

are the most easily altered/changed to the controllers will are the first to be recruited so

that numbers may be utilized as (apparent) power.

2. Keep the population pre-occupied. Create the perception that a) all is well b) even if it isnot others are taking care of it c) the population are not qualified/intelligent enough,informed enough to help or change anything. Work and recreational activities to

consume as much time as possible. These are also encouraged, in particular

entertainment, pleasure/leisure. When a), b) and c) fail or change due to the

environment altering perceptions of the population i.e. they begin to perceive things as

progressively getting worse, create new perceptions thusly: d) all is unfixable, or all is

lost. e) even if it is others are taking care of it or nothing I the individual can do f)

things may be corrected but none, or none in power at least are intelligent or

knowledgeable enough to turn things around. The resultant (promoted) activities will be:

a) apathy b) protestation c) rebellion d) demand.

Focus of attention. The percept (Illusion/delusion) that all is (relatively) ok, all that canbe done is being done (by others primarily), the daily news informs of all that is of

importance. The percept coupled with the patterns of content of thought are the primary

ways in which control is facilitated here. An individual does not perceive the calling for

any change primarily internally starting with thought. With this in place others who

make decisions may implement further measures to control, additionally attempts to

help or improve things may be ensure - for the greater picture at least - to maintain

the status quo.


25/111

3. Work will become due to interdependence primarily. To survive, including to liveanywhere will require ownership of land and the purchasing of products to build shelter,

plant food etc at the very minimal. All of these require money, in particular a

considerable amount for land which is owned by those that govern, even if it is

wilderness. Primary producers, that is those that either provide food or shelter for the

people will become less of a portion of the population as other superficial needs are

created within society as it gains complexity. These include insurance and law firms,

taxation and bureaucratic firms, communication companies, entertainment and sports and

many more. These aside from their perceived purposes have an additional purpose in

their being, that is to reduce the portion of population that serves in the primary needs of

the population, which creates a greater interdependency within the population.

The primary occupations for the people are:

Food production (and distribution)

Shelter creation

Education (teaching of primary information)

Healing

Note these only include the primary aspect of each for example:

-Food production is only those that actually grow the foods (and collect/catch for fish for

example) and secondary to those are those that actually give the food to others if required

i.e. for those that perform another task and do not grow their own or those incapable of

growing/getting their own (old, children for example)

-Shelter creation is only those that provide structural shelter not beyond requirements for

acceptable survival. Additional materials or excessive structures are all accessory and

are thus not primary and not included here.

-Education (Teachers) are only those that offer teaching to those subjects of true value to

the individual. Preaching or indoctrination is not included here. Subjects of true value

begin with philosophy, well being, food, awareness, survival/health, moving to

mathematics, sciences with lesser value. It is the subjects of true value which need befirst priority and upheld with any other subjects being built upon the foundation of the

primary ones.

-Healing is actually an auxiliary occupation. If the first 3 occupations are all to a

standard high enough, healing will take place by the individual, at least the majority of

the time. The other times a healer may be required. Their education and resources will

all be available to any individual at any time however. Instead of an individual who is

seen when one feels one needs help, the healer may be an individual who observes others

(including through communication) and where imbalance is to be seen offers help. This

is a different approach then the repair (band-aid) approach. The pathway for control in

such methodology is if the healer becomes police-like.

It is the interdependency and the hierarchy (advanced concepts of control) whichensure slavery of an individual. Only by returning to independence and as much as

possible a removal or non-participation with the societal structure may an individual

relinquish this control. However, even if this is done, with respect to the planet the

structured society still influences (and potentially controls) the individual(s) by

affecting/altering the environment, including any individuals who maintain

contact/communication with those who have segregated themselves.


26/111

4. Awareness will be satisfied by news. This will be controlled and filtered as much aspossible whilst still retaining the illusion that it is both relatively or satisfactorily

complete in content as well as factual/accurate. Danger and disaster, the negatives will be

highlighted. Followed by sport and entertainment which will become the news also.

Weather will also perform the task for the individual so that they no longer need to

observe for themselves that either. Utilize technology to bring the news, maximize

exposure and promote the need/requirement (illusory) that the people must watch/read

the news.

Illusion/delusion. Fabrication of percepts. Regulation of thought patterns. Promotion of

apathy, conformity, normalcy, docility. Limitation of thought capacity.

5. Have justice, a term understood in itself by the people as the mechanism which isdemanded by the people to enhance control over the population. It will also be used as

revenge, with some help from warlike characteristics which are also promoted by

entertainment.

Utilization of a distorted concept of freedom/control with a fabricated necessity for

punishment/revenge. All of these concepts may be derived from a distorted

concept/understanding of division and perception of the same. Thus the control or

attempt to control is justified with an ignorance or choice not to seek an alternative

conceptual understanding or learning from each situation.

6. Social conditioning will come largely from mass communication that is largely fromtelevision shows. These will then flow into public activity which will in turn generate

further social trends along the same paths. The norm and socially acceptable behavior

will serve as methods of control.

Norms, etiquettes, codes and requirements, including those that are openly stated, those

known yet not usually spoken of and those unconscious will serve aside from providing a

degree of helpfulness in terms of peacefulness within the society will also serve as means

to control, leading to segregation, isolation, class creation, hierarchy and division.

Physical means, communication and perception are primarily used here. By physical, an

example of a difference in physical appearance or a physical characteristic may be used.

Whilst the difference may be physical however, it is still the perception of that difference

which begins the process. Communication as one example would be individuals choosing

to communicate in a particular manner to those they deem to be of their class.


27/111

7. Progress for increasing control is done at a pace which is accepted by the population. Ingradual stages control is ramped up primarily to evade the awareness of the majority.

The two main requirements to ensure adoption of any new measure to control are a

sufficient level of receptibility by preceding measures of control having been

implemented and lack of memory of past events and experiences. Most effective to

diminish memory is perhaps using the tide of time with generations of the population. A

new generation if it has not been taught or shown the happenings of the previous

generation(s) and in addition if repositories of knowledge of the past are lost, inaccurate

or distorted is more easily imprinted with the latest measures to control, the guise of

progress being considerably effective. The limitation of perception and thus awareness is

the primary pathway to control here. The perception has adapted this may be

unknowingly/ unconsciously for an individual, especially if there is nothing to compare

to previously no memory or knowledge of previous states. In addition the environment

has changed which may lead to further changes in the individual, such as further

alteration to percepts. The concepts of sequential and compounding control are also

present here.

8. The hierarchical structure provides imbalance. Those towards the top take or demandmore from those below them. The resources used to provide for others is taken from the

environment. Thus the pyramid/hierarchy is imbalanced with respect to the

environment. This is another area in which control may be justified. At the point

where the imbalance begins impeding directly on the individuals in the society to a

degree which concerns the individuals, the level of control may be increased to degrees

which would previously have been unacceptable.

Here, control may be utilized further to dominate the population. The level of control at

this point may be sufficient to have the population begin either determining more directlytheir own fate or the fate of others, within the select choices of those governing. In

others words to restore some degree of balance, actual or illusory, the population or

individuals within the population may be forced or convinced to make (further) sacrifices

including at the extreme end of their life.

All the ways in which control has been facilitated has led to this level of control.

9. With the instinct for survival, the percept and understanding of division/separation andadditional programmed/adopted percepts and understandings of blame, punishment,

revenge, justice, right, wrong, good, evil, fairness, equality, peace and morality to

name perhaps current main concepts the population will, provided a basic level ofawareness may be reached and maintained, most likely rebel against the situation.

The final illusion is that the civilization could never and was never intended to do as

what was thought by the population, including those that governed thought and even

expected it to do. The civilization was created to teach the population, including those

that governed through the implementation of control to the individual and the collective,

the ways in which they may minimize or relinquish control by either ascending the

ranks of the controllers or learning true freedom.


28/111

FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS OF CONTROL

Dependence as an aspect of control may also use time for the generation of dependence or at

leastperceiveddependence, including by inference. An example is using the future to determine

a course of thought or being. There are of course situations where control is not present, the

situation logically calls for particular action. An example is working with extraordinary vigor in

order to re-establish a food supply due to unforeseen circumstances disrupting supply, such as

alternate weather conditions. There is not likely control in the previous situation based on the

information given. In another situation however, individuals may have beenprogrammedin that

they work with extraordinary effort or perform activities which would normally not have been

performed, based on the programmed understanding that these activities and excesses are

required of them. The programmed understanding in this case is that the individuals involved

mustor are requiredto work how they dofor the future. Note it is not the activities or excesses

in themselves. It is possible that these may well be justified if the circumstances do indeed call

for it and that is the option consciously and freely chosen by all involved. It is the programmed

concept which utilizes future time and dependency (even if only perceived) as a pathway for

control.

Similarly, via the use of perception, the very concept of control may be justified by the self

serving entity. This perception is then transferred to another normally by convincing. The

reader may note the same word root convince and control. A simple example of this is another

entity who has done something which has hurt another or caused damage/destruction. The

perception of this entity arises from the facts of the matter the hurt (which includes perceptions

and subjectivity) or damage which then either forms or reinforces the understanding for the

necessity for control. This of course is an incomplete/distorted understanding which paves the

way for imbalance. If what has been stated proceeds as is, the distorted understanding may only

lead to greater and greater means to control, furthering imbalance and if applicable, collapse.

The role of perceptions will be considered in depth in a following chapter, along with social

dynamics of imbalance/balance. An understanding of control would be incomplete without an

understanding of freedom, so that is the discussion to follow.

The occupation of time is a possible means to control. This runs alongside the attention or focus

of an individual. It is quite possible (in linear time) to occupy an individuals attention/focus on

any one thing, creating essentially limitation in that the individual does not look up to see other

happenings. Essentially this is limitation of awareness (awareness discussed later) although the

pathways of perception and understanding may be used to map any active control. The

occupation of an individuals focus works with keeping an individual busy (occupying their

time) on tasks which do anything but allow them to make progress which would help them or

hinder the controller. Likewise, repeating patterns may do the same thing with a number of

things which occupy an individuals attention. It may be noted that all experience may be

learnt from, so the absence of meaningful progress or the occupation of an individuals focus

does not necessarily mean an individual may not see the situation or patterns in retrospect. Thepatterns, being cyclical themselves would tend to work within a cycle. For example an

individual spends the majority of their time focused on thought and activity which is related to

several things. There may be some variation, however in this example, each day (cycle) focus is

maintained upon things related to those several things. Over a larger cycle (years for example)

those several things may be replaced with a new set of several things.

Association, which is largely perceptive, is another pathway to control worthy of consideration.

This example, which is basically the acceptance, consideration, or determination of one thing


29/111

based on another, utilizes perception and understanding. The pathways listed are still

applicable, the example shows how expansive perception and understanding are in an individual

with respect to attempts to control. Perception and understanding will be considered later in the

text. The point here is there is much more than the basic words listed in the pathways to control.

It is a matter for the reader to consider and observe carefully, remaining as open as possible to

any number of ways, rather than trying to fit what has been listed onto a given situation.

Basic ways to control, if considered sufficiently may be seen to originate from pathways listed.

These include straight forward ways - often with fear as an emotional component such as

absence/removal of food/water for survival, removal/disconnection/harm to those an individual

feels connected to such as loved ones and fear of harm to the individual themself or death. Fear

and dependency are main aspects in these. Fear is usually of the unknown or simply of pain.

Dependency is always available for leverage for those seeking to control. Fear of loss in some

way is usually present. Thoughts and feelings, including fear is derived from any or all aspects

of the triad of perception, awareness and knowledge/understanding. This will be looked at in the

next chapter.

Since the discussion will be focused more upon the mind in the next chapter rather than theconceptual understanding here, programming, conditioning and the like will be explored in the

proceeding chapter also.

The pathways listed previously are not so concrete. There is some adaptability as well as

potential for limitless combinations. In addition not all situations are due to control, or not all

from external entities. Control also may be generated by the self. Essentially though, as

previously stated, the self is the gateway. This means regardless of whence the control or

attempt to control originates, provided the self is capable in body/mind/spirit, the choice, the

potential, the ability to relinquish (or destroy, although a negative approach) rests with the self.

As will be discussed later in the text, the means to determine attempts to control or activecontrol are observation, consideration, analysis and intuition.

Overall, the concept of Illusion followed by the concept of limitation principally open pathways

to control. It could be said that illusion is a form of limitation itself whilst any limitation, with

respect to an infinite universe is an illusion itself.

It may also be helpful to the reader to differentiate between a conceptual understanding of

control/freedom, possible/probable actuated control and actuated control. Only to the degree the

knowledge and concept is grasped may limitation and hindrance be removed.


30/111

FREEDOM

Freedom is the absence of control. It is also the resultant of those that tend towards balance. An

entity that is balanced or approaches balance will tend to share with others and help others where

possible, suitable and/or asked for*. An entity that is balanced will tend to have no need to

control themself or others, nor any desire to do so. This may seem paradoxical in the sense that

an entity must exert control over themselves in a situation where they may potentially controlanother (example of physical or psychical hurt). This is not the case and the understanding is

conceived from an unbalanced or self serving understanding. Whilst it is still possible for hurt

to occur no pathway for control is accessed or used by a balanced entity. Control may occur

only by the self upon the self of the other entity only if it is insufficiently balanced.

An entity approaching balance is one with less and less need to control themselves, just as they

have no need to control others. The seeming paradox to the reader may be that in order to

progress along this path one must make effort, one must control and discipline themselves to not

control themselves and/or others. Recall that one cannot control control. This is simple control

nested within control. Now to let go or relinquish as a deliberate attempt by an entity to ridthemself or others of control is also an effort. Balance, and the resultant freedom cannot be

caught, they cannot be grasped. One cannot truly hold onto that which is free. Hence freedom

is a state of being, that is, for lack of a better word, discovered. One may choose their path and

one may envision their destination, but one will arrive when they arrive, no sooner, no later and

hence it is either of no value or counter-productive to anticipate or expect.

Those that serve themselves as noted previously build the walls that imprison. Conversely those

that serve others remove the walls that imprison or show the walls of the prison to those willing

to see. It is hindrance versus helpfulness.

Freedom is a place one may always return to.

It may be noted that the concept of freedom may also be used to control. Note it is the concept

only, for as stated previously true freedom cannot be controlled. An illusion of freedom, a falsity

of freedom and necessities for apparent freedom are examples of control under the guise of

freedom. An example of an illusion of freedom is the use of laws or restrictions with the

promotion of freedom being present. An example of falsity of freedom might be the same in the

mind of the individual or an escaped prisoner believing they are free when in actuality they have

escaped from one prison to enter another as yet unrecognized. An example of a created

necessity (an illusion) for apparent freedom would be security. To maintain freedom, security

must be maintained. In truth, security is the freedom itself. The only necessity to obtain

freedom (a misnomer) is to remove all forms of control. Freedom between entities and between

groups of entities results when both entities/groups are free from control.

It may be seen at this point that one cannot instill freedom in another for this is control. This is

quite impossible in terms of freedom. With a pointed finger a pathway may be shown to another

entity, however it is the entity who must choose the path if they wish.

*Technicality:

1. The serving of others may technically be an imbalanced entity which mayprovide balance.

2. We may say that a balanced entity whom also provides balance is one who knows freedom.

3. Those that sufficiently serve themselves may potentially be in balance in themselves, butpromote/provide

imbalance.


31/111

A society largely in balance will tend to have immunity against imbalance. By virtue of being

balanced, an entity finding themselves out of balance, for example with an excess of one thing or

another, would tend to restore balance that is shed or give the excess or ask or seek out in the

case of deficiency. This stability along with others of the same caliber is that which maintains

balance and provides immunity against imbalance. This is both imbalance of individuals, the

group and the environment of the group.

Freedom, by example has the potential to indicate to others the merits of such path. The lesson

may be learnt, at least in part, from observation which in addition may be compared to an

observation of control for example. Thus a balanced entity tends to provide catalyst for

progression towards balance.

Elements of balance and thus freedom are:

Acceptance, forgiveness and relinquishment.

They are the opposite for the elements of imbalance:

Control, resentment and restraint/constraint.


32/111

PATHWAYS FOR FREEDOM:

Freedom is the state of being which results when all pathways for control are first identified then

relinquished. Freedom for a group of entities only results when all members have identified and

relinquished all pathways for control. Naturally in contrast to control, the greater the portion of

the number of pathways to control that are relinquished, the greater the ease with which the

remainder of the pathways may be relinquished. Likewise in a group of entities, the greater theportion of members of the group that approach balance, the greater the probability that the

minority members will follow towards balance.

Defined pathways:

1. Alteration of perceptionThis pathway of control is aimed at creating and/or distorting an entitys view of

their perceived reality and/or perception of any given concept or topic. An entity

approaching balance will tend towards perception with utmost clarity.

[A] Adaptation

Control may take the form of having an entity adapt without question orcomplacently accept their current state of being and/or future states of

being. The states are possibly more likely to be negative that is the

conditions or state of the entity being controlled or their environment is

progressively getting worse however they may also be positive. In this

latter case Illusion or falsity (false gifts) may also be active.

An entity approaching balance will tend to choose to adapt where the

adaptation may promote balance or will reject adaptation if the

adaptation will promote imbalance.

[B] IllusionIllusions as a pathway for control can be seen to be more than alteration

of perception. But in terms of perception, there is the alteration of the

environment, alteration of another entity (including the one intending to

control) and there is the creation of a sub illusion (or sub reality, fictional

story etc) which may then alter the controlled entitys perception of either

themself, their environment including others entities.Illusions will most likely be identified and understood and if possible

avoided/relinquished, otherwise accepted where required/necessary.

[C] FalsityThis pathway of control could have been grouped with illusion. It may be

seen to be illusion by inference that is the illusion is essentially self

generated by the one being controlled. This pathway approaches non-existence as an entity approaches balance due to clarity in understanding

and perception.

[D] DifferenceThis pathway of control seems to take the form of a dividing line. A

difference or division is perceived and thus allows for any number of

distortions to be implemented or allowed to flourish. Ultimately this form

of control is through limitation. This pathway is relinquished as an entity

perceives no true difference and understands illusory differences.


33/111

2. Alteration of understandingThis pathway of control is aimed at distorting current knowledge/understanding

of the controlled entity, including the addition of distorted/incorrect/meaningless

knowledge for purposes of confusion or dilution, or subtraction of knowledge

which may aid the entity or be perceived to be a potential aid by the one

attempting to control. The opposite which potentially frees an entity is the

gathering of knowledge as well as the discernment, analysis and understandingof knowledge gathered such that the understanding of the entity is as complete,

balanced and free from distortion as the entity is capable of.

[A] DirectA direct alteration or distortion of a current understanding, including

removal. This includes all forms of programming.Discernment coupled

with current knowledge forms a shield against this pathway for control in

an entity approaching balance.

[B] Inversion

The intention with this pathway is to take the current knowledge andconvert its meaning to the opposite of what it was previously. Confusion

may be the intended outcome.Discernment coupled with current

knowledge forms a shield against this pathway for control in an entity

approaching balance.

[C] Dilution

This pathway intends to muddy the pool with information which may

contain elements of truth/helpfulness/usefulness but usually contains a

majority of the opposite elements. The more that is added, the more

diluted the pool of information becomes. The information may be that

which is being received by the entity, that which is being sent or that

which is stored (memory). Disinformation falls under this method aswell as bombardment or excess information inflow. Knowledge forms a

shield against this pathway for control in an entity approaching balance.

[D] LimitationAny barrier set up to prevent or hinder expanding upon a current

understanding or as yet unknown/undiscovered piece of knowledge.

Limitation of awareness is included here as well as limitation of attention.

An entity approaching balance gains the ability to perceive such

limitations, either internal or external and may then relinquish such

limitations.


34/111

3. Alteration of the physical entityControl in this form is aimed at altering or limiting in some way the physical

body. In particular the functioning of the physical body which directly

inhibits/alters the mind or the capability of the entity to utilize its mind.

[A] Physical needs/desires

These include such as food intake, exercise, intimacy but may also beadditional or become excessive or addictive. It also includes physical

aspects which may be accessory or not required for survival. Of those

which may be changed, an entity approaching balance will tend to opt for

those choices which promote balance and well-being.


This is straight alteration of the physical body. Knowledge and awareness

of a balanced entity will shield against changes where possible.


This is alteration of any portion of the body which affects directly the

functioning of the mind of the entity.Knowledge and awareness of a balanced entity will shield against

changes where possible.


35/111

4. Alteration of an entitys environmentThe environment may be seen to include the entity or entities attempting to

control if necessary. In this way the control of the entity to be controlled stems

from controlling that which is around the entity to be controlled. Thus all the

methods outlined for controlling an entity may be applied to the environment,

with some obvious exceptions depending on what the environment consists of.

An entity approaching balance will tend to be aware of the alterations and thepossible affects of such. This awareness and knowledge allows the entity to

bend with the wind or accept the changes to the degree suitable.

[A] TimeThis form of control is an option, however see alteration of perception of

time and alteration of the physical with respect to lifespan and

functionality.

[B] Space

Alteration of the physical space in which the entity dwells, resides or

visits.

[C] Physical/chemical environment.Alteration of all other aspects of an entitys environment if the

environment is being defined as that which does not have the

controllability of another entity or equivalent.

[D] Connection(s)This involves the alteration or limitation of an entitys connection or

dependence on any part of its environment, including other entities. It

also involves the creation of systemized ties/dependencies.

[X] Nested control (see advanced concepts for additional information)

5. Alteration of communicationWhilst perception is defined here as that which an entity interprets of its external

environment including other entities, communication is any available means to

transfer/receive information from the environment or other entities, excluding the

information received via perception. An entity approaching balance will tend to

have an awareness at least of the characteristics and limitations of the modes of

communication and as such will tend to ensure as clear and open a form of

communication as possible.

[A] DirectThis pathway is aimed at altering how communication takes place,

eliminating or limiting it either one way or both ways (input and output)

[B] MediumThis may be alteration or limitation of language or the form of

communication.


36/111

PROGRESS TOWARDS FREEDOM

Unlike control there is no method to freedom. This may seem incorrect at first glance. If it

does, it is likely the reader still utilized the concept of control as a means to freedom. Granted,

in a heavily controlled society, individuals may not be able to comprehend this and/or may

refute it outright. The book may be abandoned and categorized as nonsense or false. Both

options are acceptable in this example being described. There is that which does not make senseto any individual, that which does not make sense universally and that which simply does not

make sense to the individual in question since they do not understand at that point in time. That

which is deemed false may indeed be false or it may oppositely be true, yet perceived as false.

Now all these points contain pathways to control. The reader may see the first hurdle. Control,

where already present may be seen to have the upper hand. An individual heavily controlled,

by themself or others or both, might be seen to be unable to begin, unable to progress towards

freedom. It might be seen they may chase an illusive concept of freedom or seek progress, yet

they either run in circles or take one step forward for every two steps backward. An individual

always has the opportunity to begin and may always return to freedom. Freedom cannot be

contained, not even by time, it will wait forever for any individual to return when the individual

chooses to do so. There are no short-cuts to freedom. There is efficiency, that is a maximization

of progress with respect to perceived linear time, however attempting to skip ahead or cheat willresult in repeating the lessons. With this in mind, it is suggested, in view of a balanced

approach to take ones time, have patience, yet strive without effort or strain. If you let it, time

will become your friend rather than your foe.

Now, to return to the beginning statement. The english language does not seem to have an

antonym to the word method. Perhaps there can be none. Probably the next logical question the

reader may ask is; If control is to be relinquished for freedom to result, how do I relinquish

control?. This may be the first puzzle to the reader, perhaps stemming from the meaning of

words more than anything else. If a set course was laid out before the reader or a student on the

following page or a lecture was given, the same to the reader/student as to any other person, it is

open to, and would likely, with any (additional) workings of other individuals seeking to control,

result in failure to some degree.Interestingly, this helping or attempting to help is still a success in its offering and is also

successful in an inverted sense in that it provides opportunity for those that seek to control.

However, it is possible to still serve those who seek to control, without offering any opportunity

for them to get what they seek. A final solution for freedom is as impossible as a final solution

for control. The reason for this, if the reader does not understand the previous statement will be

considered later in the text.

A true pathway to relinquishing control has as a fundamental requirement to remain open. This

concept has as its meaning being used, an unset path, one with the property of selective

changeability.


37/111

I


38/111

I (Self)

An entity will learn by choice or by necessity. That which is not learnt now, may be repeated

later. The form may change, the lesson remains the same. We will begin with the conscious

choosing to learn, or for this discussion the conscious choosing to learn about and thus progress

with oneself.

The concept of progressing oneself at first glance offers two paths. The first is a seeminglyrandom, haphazard approach where experience is simply tallied up and considered after the

experience or collective experiences. The second approach is one with a preset plan, that is a

formula which is intended to give set results to those who apply it as intended. Both paths may

also be adopted together, either in part or full. Both paths may be seen to have merits, but both

paths may be seen to have limits. For the limits, examples include an inability or high degree of

difficulty in substantiating progress for the first path, conformity and inflexibility for the second

path. The commonality to both paths is that they seek both awareness and knowledge which

will inherently lead to being. So to begin with, what is required is an investigation into the way

to knowledge or epistemology.

Knowledge is infinite. Knowledge is both ever present and ever available. There is nothingwhich cannot be known, yet simultaneously there is always something new to know, since

knowledge is infinite. The ways to knowledge are o

a wanderer's way

Documents