a (very) temporary operating instruction

30
A (Very) Temporary Operating Instruction NATS Unclassified Practical Application of a Systems Thinking Approach Craig Foster & Lee Boulton

Upload: others

Post on 10-Dec-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

A (Very) Temporary Operating Instruction

NATS Unclassified

Practical Application of a Systems Thinking Approach Craig Foster & Lee Boulton

Contents Level Busts & Altimeter Setting Error Putting the risk in context

Addressing the Risk The use of a Temporary Operating Instruction (TOI)

Unexpected Consequences Impact of the TOI

Taking a Systems Thinking Approach Outline of a process

Conclusions from Thinking in Systems Summary & reflections on the approach

General Conclusions On systems thinking, Safety II and our next steps

24-26 Sept 2014

NATS

Managing the traffic

NATS 24-26 Sept 2014

Managing the traffic

NATS 24-26 Sept 2014

Heathrow

Southend

Stansted

Luton

London City

Gatwick

Southampton

Farnborough

Managing the traffic

NATS 24-26 Sept 2014

Work as done

NATS 24-26 Sept 2014

Level Bust - Altimeter Setting Error (ASE)

24-26 Sept 2014

NATS

5000ft

FL80

6000ft

QNH Atmospheric Pressure = 1013 hPA Standard Pressure

8000ft

Transition Altitude

FL90

BigJet 123, Climb FL80

9000ft

BPS: QNH = 1013 hPa

BPS: Standard Pressure = 1013 hPa

Time margin to input new pressure

Level Bust due to ASE

24-26 Sept 2014

NATS

5000ft

FL80

6000ft

QNH Atmospheric Pressure = 980 hPA Typical Low Pressure

8000ft

Transition Altitude

FL90

BigJet 123, Climb FL80

9000ft

BPS: QNH = 980 hPa

Considerably less time to get it right

BPS: Standard Pressure = 1013 hPa

Level Bust due to ASE

24-26 Sept 2014

NATS

5000ft

FL80

6000ft

8000ft

Transition Altitude

FL90

BigJet 123, Climb FL80

9000ft

BPS: QNH = 980 hPa

BPS: QNH= 980 hPa

Level Bust

QNH Atmospheric Pressure = 980 hPA Typical Low Pressure

Level Busts in the London TMA - A Real Risk

› A B747 in strong headwind conditions after a long flight

› Low pressure

› Tail end of the night shift

› Morning of the storm nicknamed ‘St Jude’

› 5 go-arounds from 27L in a row

› Both aircraft had gone around within the last 5 minutes and wanted to return to the holding pattern to wait for the weather to improve

› Change of hold, extreme weather and fuel concerns contributed to high cockpit workload

24-26 Sept 2014

NATS

Interpretation 1

24-26 Sept 2014

NATS 12

Involved Aircraft

Heathrow

Extended Centrelines

BIGGIN hold

Interpretation 2

24-26 Sept 2014

NATS 13

Separation marker Bearing & distance

Mode S Downlinked Parameters Inc. BPS

Interpretation3

24-26 Sept 2014

NATS 14

Separation marker Bearing & distance

Callsign Selected Flight Level

Altitude (Axx) or Flight Level (yyy)

Target Position

Previous positions

Level Busts in the London TMA - Actions taken

› A key risk to the NATS operation in the London TMA

› Working with aircraft manufacturers to enable all aircraft to downlink barometric pressure settings to NATS systems

› Expand and standardise the use of Mode S downlinked parameters

› Transmit transition level on ATIS

› Conduct studies with airlines, using everyday observations on the flight deck to identify issues and improve altimeter setting procedures and recommend improved SOPs

› Longer term programmes such as… – redesign of the London TMA – raising the Transition Altitude … are expected to provide mitigation

24-26 Sept 2014

NATS

The Numbers

24-26 Sept 2014

NATS

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

960

970

980

990

1000

1010

1020

1-2

005

3-2

005

5-2

005

7-2

005

9-2

005

11-2

005

1-2

006

3-2

006

5-2

006

7-2

006

9-2

006

11-2

006

1-2

007

3-2

007

5-2

007

7-2

007

9-2

007

11-2

007

1-2

008

3-2

008

5-2

008

7-2

008

9-2

008

11-2

008

1-2

009

3-2

009

5-2

009

7-2

009

9-2

009

11-2

009

1-2

010

3-2

010

5-2

010

7-2

010

9-2

010

11-2

010

1-2

011

3-2

011

5-2

011

7-2

011

9-2

011

11-2

011

1-2

012

3-2

012

5-2

012

7-2

012

9-2

012

11-2

012

1-2

013

3-2

013

5-2

013

7-2

013

9-2

013

11-2

013

1-2

014

Even

t C

ou

nt

Pressu

re

Month

Alt_Error_Level_Bust MinOfpressure

Do we act?

24-26 Sept 2014

NATS

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

1-2

005

3-2

005

5-2

005

7-2

005

9-2

005

11-2

005

1-2

006

3-2

006

5-2

006

7-2

006

9-2

006

11-2

006

1-2

007

3-2

007

5-2

007

7-2

007

9-2

007

11-2

007

1-2

008

3-2

008

5-2

008

7-2

008

9-2

008

11-2

008

1-2

009

3-2

009

5-2

009

7-2

009

9-2

009

11-2

009

1-2

010

3-2

010

5-2

010

7-2

010

9-2

010

11-2

010

1-2

011

3-2

011

5-2

011

7-2

011

9-2

011

11-2

011

1-2

012

3-2

012

5-2

012

7-2

012

9-2

012

11-2

012

1-2

013

3-2

013

5-2

013

7-2

013

9-2

013

11-2

013

1-2

014

Altimeter setting error Average 1 sigma above 2 sigma above 3 sigma above 1 sigma below

Nelson 1: Points outside 3σ

Nelson 6: 4 of 5 > 1σ

Nelson 8: 8 in a row outside 1σ

Nelson 2: >9 points on one side of μ

Simple rules applied to the data suggest an investigation is recommended

Temporary Operating Instruction

› In early 2014 the UK experienced a prolonged period of low atmospheric pressure

› At the same time there was a cluster of level busts at the transition altitude

› Thought to be linked to Altimeter Setting Error

› Tactical short-term response to address perceived trend issue a Temporary Operating Instruction (TOI) to controllers

› Safety accountabilities in the operation drove behaviour – Pressure & Culture – Something must be done – What was being done wasn’t enough

24-26 Sept 2014

NATS

Level Bust due to Altimeter Setting Error

24-26 Sept 2014

NATS

5000ft

FL80

6000ft

QNH Atmospheric Pressure < 1000 hPa

8000ft

Transition Altitude

FL90

BigJet 123, Climb FL80 Standard Pressure Setting

9000ft

BPS: QNH < 1000 hPa

BPS: Standard Pressure = 1013 hPa

Must Remember to

Change to 1013 hPa

Temporary Operating Instruction

› Hoped the introduction of the phraseology would serve as a reminder to the pilot to set standard pressure setting (1013 hPa) and so reduce level busts due to ASE.

› Subject to normal hazard assessment process for a procedural change

› Implemented on 20 Feb 2014 on a trial basis with planned end date 20 May 2014

› Change also detailed in NOTAM

24-26 Sept 2014

NATS

Unexpected Consequences

› During the first days of implementation several occurrence reports were filed

› Controllers noted that: – Flight crews did not understand the meaning

of the instruction – Did not read back as required

› Required: – Additional R/T to explain the instruction – Additional workload – Other unintended consequences

24-26 Sept 2014

NATS

“… Standard Pressure Setting” “… Route Direct Detling”

A Systems Thinking Approach

› Reports served as a weak signal

› Decided to explore the level bust problem, the TOI and the response to its introduction as events unfolded

› Used some straightforward Systems Thinking techniques

› Reflected on the 10 Systems Thinking principles in the White Paper

› Highlighted that the TOI was – Simple, rational, understandable – TOIs are normal work for quickly mitigating

issues in the operation

› Outcome: Unfortunately ineffective solution to a more complex system problem – Couldn’t predict the cause and effect

24-26 Sept 2014

NATS

24-26 Sept 2014

NATS

Information People

Rules & Procedures

EquipmentTraining

Environment

Purpose: Prevent Level Busts (due to altimeter setting error)

Out of Scope

Culture

Other causes of level busts

Information People

Rules & Procedures

EquipmentTraining

Environment

Softer Comms

NATS Safety Data Pilot ATC Pilot Controller

ATC W/S Flight Deck

ATCPilotICAO

SARG

AirspaceLow Pressure

Experience in UK

Weather

PilotController

Purpose: Prevent Level Busts (due to altimeter setting error)

Out of Scope

Culture

Other causes of level busts

Information People

Rules & Procedures

EquipmentTraining

Environment

Softer Comms

NATS Safety Data Pilot ATC Pilot Controller

ATC W/S Flight Deck

ATCPilotICAO

SARG

AirspaceLow Pressure

Experience in UK

Weather

PilotController

PPRUNE

Rumour & Discussion

4114Trends

Causes

Campaigns

NOTAM

ATIS

R/T Instruction (to change level)

MET Brief

Safety Reports

Safety Notice

R/T Instruction (to change level)

MET Brief

AOC Business Approach

Non-AOC Business

UK Airline

ICAO Airline

GA

TMA

ICAO SOPs

UK SOPs

TOI

SI

MATS Pt 1 & 2

Trans Alt Trans Lvl

Design

FMSNon-FMS

Mode S XPDR

Altimeter Setting

Radar Tools

Mode S Data

Strips

ATC Training

Flight Schools

Airline Training Depts

Purpose: Prevent Level Busts (due to altimeter setting error)

Out of Scope

Culture

Other causes of level busts

Information People

Rules & Procedures

EquipmentTraining

Environment

Softer Comms

NATS Safety Data Pilot ATC Pilot Controller

ATC W/S Flight Deck

ATCPilotICAO

SARG

AirspaceLow Pressure

Experience in UK

Weather

PilotController

PPRUNE

Rumour & Discussion

4114Trends

Causes

Campaigns

NOTAM

ATIS

R/T Instruction (to change level)

MET Brief

Safety Reports

Safety Notice

R/T Instruction (to change level)

MET Brief

AOC Business Approach

Non-AOC Business

UK Airline

ICAO Airline

GA

TMA

ICAO SOPs

UK SOPs

TOI

SI

MATS Pt 1 & 2

Trans Alt Trans Lvl

Design

FMSNon-FMS

Mode S XPDR

Altimeter Setting

Radar Tools

Mode S Data

Strips

ATC Training

Flight Schools

Airline Training Depts

Purpose: Prevent Level Busts (due to altimeter setting error)

Out of Scope

Culture

Other causes of level busts

24-26 Sept 2014

NATS

Information People

Rules & Procedures

EquipmentTraining

Environment

Softer Comms

NATS Safety Data Pilot ATC Pilot Controller

ATC W/S Flight Deck

ATCPilotICAO

SARG

AirspaceLow Pressure

Experience in UK

Weather

PilotController

PPRUNE

Rumour & Discussion

4114Trends

Causes

Campaigns

NOTAM

ATIS

R/T Instruction (to change level)

MET Brief

Safety Reports

Safety Notice

R/T Instruction (to change level)

MET Brief

AOC Business Approach

Non-AOC Business

UK Airline

ICAO Airline

GA

TMA

ICAO SOPs

UK SOPs

TOI

SI

MATS Pt 1 & 2

Trans Alt Trans Lvl

Design

FMSNon-FMS

Mode S XPDR

Altimeter Setting

Radar Tools

Mode S Data

Strips

ATC Training

Flight Schools

Airline Training Depts

Purpose: Prevent Level Busts (due to altimeter setting error)

Out of Scope

Culture

Other causes of level busts

Highlights what might work - The most influential aspects of

the system

Highlights what to be careful with - Stopping criteria

Highlights what might not work - Distance in influence from the

target

Queries for more data - To understand the chain of influence better

Strong & Weak links - Areas for improvement or action

Suggest ideas for new components or influences

10 Principles - A few findings

24-26 Sept 2014

NATS

Pilots and controllers are field experts, but their involvement in the TOI’s development was limited

Goal & intent of the TOI may have been unclear

No one intends to deviate from their level

The nature of work changes in low atmospheric pressure Need to do something

Frequent users of the LTMA have an expectation regarding R/T – deviations are confusing Requests for clarification disrupt flow

10 Principles - A few findings

24-26 Sept 2014

NATS

Efficiency and thoroughness when reading briefings and on R/T

R/T is already deliberately tailored to pilots unfamiliar with the London

TMA or due to differences in perceived English proficiency

Requiring all instructions to contain

the new phraseology removes flexibility and performance variability

Outcome can be seen as a case of emergence

Analysis of normal work as source of both success and failure Initially ‘work as imagined’ - next stage to consider ‘work as done’ via observational techniques

Systems Focus: – Overall Impressions

› Systems Thinking & the 10 principles present a: – New Language – New Philosophy – New Mind-set … which can be integrated and/or run in parallel with our other safety management activities

› New perspectives and new questions – Allows ‘total system’ view – Socio-technical view not just equipment

› Pictorial & Positive view of the way the system works – Helps communication & shows how work is

really done

› Systems safety principles guide a conversation about how components are influential on the system – Weaknesses and strengths of the system – Areas for possible action

› A way of probing for unintended consequences

NATS 24-26 Sept 2014

Systems Focus: – Overall Impressions

› There is still value in the ‘Old Way’ but should consider incorporating these ideas into our existing processes

› Current focus has been on investigation

› Further work is needed on embedding these ideas into the design and assurance of procedures & equipment

› Benefits go beyond safety – Discussion of flow (and interruptions to flow)

possibly highlights requirements for processes, systems, actions etc. to improve how the work works

NATS 24-26 Sept 2014

What happened to the TOI?

› The ‘one size fits all’ approach of the TOI was not sustainable

› It was withdrawn

› Subsequently, a safety notice was issued highlighting: – Level bust issue – Range of operating techniques available and

already applied in day-to-day work – Reiterated possible risk mitigation actions

including: – possible phraseology options – changes to controlling style – consideration of the cockpit workload

NATS 24-26 Sept 2014

Summary, Conclusions & Next Steps

› Systems Thinking, Safety II & Resilience Engineering present a welcome challenge to the accepted safety management principles used in NATS

› Work shows considerable promise and …

› … has been embraced within NATS Safety Strategy

– Available on-line from www.nats.aero

› But new approaches must – Be practical – Address more than just investigations but

also the design of new systems & procedures – Be usable by people whose day job isn’t

safety management processes

› Tentative, but positive, steps in this direction have been made

24-26 Sept 2014

NATS

Thank you for listening http://nats.aero