a tutorial in connectome analysis (ii): topological and ... · 0 50 100 0 20 40 60 w2d400 101...
TRANSCRIPT
http://www.dynamic-connectome.org
http://neuroinformatics.ncl.ac.uk/
@ConnectomeLab
Dr Marcus Kaiser
A Tutorial in Connectome Analysis (II): Topological and Spatial Features of Brain Networks
Professor of NeuroinformaticsSchool of Computing Science /Institute of NeuroscienceNewcastle UniversityUnited Kingdom
2
Outline• Spatial neural networks• Connection length distributions• Component placement optimization• Role of long-distance connections• Deficits due to changes in long-distance
connectivity (Alzheimer’s disease and IQ)
3
Macaque (rhesus monkey) cortical network
4
C. elegans neural network
Global level (277 neurons)
Local level (131 neurons)
5
Most projections connect adjacent neurons(Gamma function for connection length distribution)
0 20 40
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
Connection length [mm]
Freq
uenc
y
0 0.5 10
0.1
0.2
0.3
Connection length [mm]
Freq
uenc
y
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Connection length [mm]
Freq
uenc
y
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0.2
0.4
0.6
Connection length [mm]
Freq
uenc
y
Macaque cortical
Rat neuronal
C. elegansneuronal (local)
C. elegansneuronal (global)
Kaiser et al. (2009) Cerebral Cortex
0 10 20 30 40 500
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Connection length [mm]
Rel
ativ
e freq
uenc
y
C
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.20
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
Connection length [mm]
Rel
ativ
e freq
uenc
y
D
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
Connection length [mm]
Rel
ativ
e freq
uenc
y
A
20 40 60 80 100
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Connection length [mm]
Rel
ativ
e freq
uenc
y
B
Macaque cortical
Rat neuronal
Human DTI Human rsMRI
Also true for human structural and functional connectivity
Kaiser (2011) Neuroimage
7
Why is there an exponential tail?
0 50 1000
100
200
300
w2d1000000
0 50 1000
100
200
300
w2d1000001
0 50 1000
100
200
300
w2d1000010
0 50 1000
100
200
300
w2d1000011
0 50 1000
100
200
300
w2d1000100
Num
ber o
f occ
urre
nces
0 50 1000
100
200
300
w2d1000101
0 50 1000
100
200
300
w2d1000110
0 50 1000
100
200
300
w2d1000111
0 50 1000
20
40
60
w2d400100
0 50 1000
20
40
60
w2d400101
Connection length0 50 100
0
20
40
60
w2d400110
0 50 1000
20
40
60
w2d400111
Connection length (units)
Occ
urre
nces
X: number of steps until another neuron is in the range of the axonal growth cone
p: probability that unit space contains a neuronq = 1 - p
t=1
t=2
t=3
P(X = n) = p * qn-1
-> exponential distribution
Kaiser et al. (2009) Cerebral Cortex
8
Reducing neural wiring costs
• Minimizing total wire length reduces metabolic costs for connection establishment and signal propagation
• Component Placement Optimization, CPOEvery alternative arrangement of network nodes will lead to a higher total wiring length
• Not the case! Reductions by 30-50% possible
A
B C
D A
B C
D
rearranging nodes A and D
Kaiser & Hilgetag (2006) PLoS Computational Biology, 7:e95
9
More long-distance projections than expected
Arrangement with reduced total wiring length
Original arrangement
10
When long-distance fibers are missing (minimal):
original
minimal
ASP
Long-distance connections are short-cuts that help to reducethe characteristic path length (or average shortets path, ASP):Less long-distance connections -> longer path lengths
11
Low path lengths = few intermediate processing steps are beneficial
- Synchrony of near and distant regions
- Reduced transmission delays
- Less (cross-modal) interference
- Higher reliability of transmission
12
Linking structure and function
13
Small-world properties
Stam et al. Cerebral Cortex (2007)
EEG synchronization Network(functional connectivity)
in Alzheimer’s patientsand control group
14
Alzheimer: Path length vs. task performance
Mini Mental State Examination (attention, memory, language)
Diamonds: Alzheimer patients
Empty squares:Control
15
Cognition: Path length vs. IQ
Van den Heuvel (2009) J. Neurosci. 29: 7619
Correlations between local path length lambda (shortest path length from one node to any other node) and IQ (Intelligence Quotient) for medial prefrontal cortex, bilateral inferior parietal cortex and precuneus / posterior cingulate regions (p < 0.05, corrected for age).
Resting state fMRI in 19 subjects (functional connectivity based on coherence)
16
Summary
5. Linking structure and function: - Alzheimer’s disease: path lengths- IQ: path lengths
4. Spatial properties:- Preference for connections to neighbours
- Fast processing due to long-distance connections