a study to compare the use of wide bore nasogastric feeding tubes compared to fine bore nasogastric...

1
P21 / British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 52 (2014) e75–e127 e85 P29 A study to compare the use of wide bore nasogastric feed- ing tubes compared to fine bore nasogastric feeding tubes for the purpose of feeding and medication administration inserted peri- operatively for head and neck oncological resections Damian Broderick , L.F.A. Stassen, Kumara Ekanayake St James’s Hospital Dublin Introduction: The objective of the study was to determine any clinical or patient perceived benefit to using a wide bore nasogastric (NG) tube following a head and neck oncological resection. (Ethical approval received). Fine bore tubes get blocked following use and sometimes require removal and replacing. Wide bore tubes have the advantage of minimal blockage they can be more uncomfortable. Variation exists between head and neck surgeons as to which NG is used. Materials/Methods: Patients assigned randomly to those having a wide bore NG tube or a fine bore tube. There are two treatment groups. Collection of information required the use of three forms. The first form was completed by sur- geon/anaesthetist placing NG tube, the second by nursing staff on the ward and the third by patients on removal of the NG tube. Each form has a study reference number to allow the information to be collated. 32 patients were included in the study. 17 had a wide bore tube, 15 had narrow bore. Results/Statistics: Statistical analysis is ongoing, how- ever the trend reveals that wide bore tubes never blocked and never needed to be replaced for this reason. Patients however found them more uncomfortable. Narrow bore tubes fre- quently blocked with increased time demands on nurses/team to unblock/replace, with increased radiographical exposure. Conclusion/relevance: Given the increased risk of block- ing of narrow bore NG tubes it is our view that where tolerated a wide bore NG tube should be used for feeding purposes in the post operative period. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.07.131 P30 A review of 1500 consecutive skin malignancy excisions: the East Lancashire experience Kenneth Corsar , C. Sweet, C. Johnston, K. Mcalister, G. Chiu Royal Blackburn Hospital Introduction: basal cell carcinoma is the most com- mon skin malignancy in Western World with Squamous cell carcinoma being the second most common. Despite other treatment being available surgery still plays the major role in treatment of these cancers. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective study of all malignant head and neck skin lesions that were excised between Jan 2009-Dec 2013. Potential cases were identified by the pathology laboratory and recorded and stored on the East Lancashire skin database. All incisional and punch biopsies were excluded from the study. Excisions were defined as “incomplete” when the tumour was reported as being present at the lateral or deep resection margins. Results: 1500 malignant skin neoplasms were excised from 1312 patients. 94% of these malignancies were basal cell carcinoma, 16% were squamous cell carcinoma. Of these lesions <5% were incompletely excised Conclusions: Our incomplete excision rate compares favourably with previously published results which varies between 5-20%. Incompletely excised lesions were more commonly seen in the central face region and were of “high risk” as defined by BAD guidelines. Reasons for this were due to narrower margins taken in these areas due to a lack of available tissues for reconstruction, more aggressive histological subtypes of tumour and subclinical spread occurring in the central face. Our study did not look at the grade of surgeon carrying out these procedures which may have influenced the results. All lesions which were incompletely excised were dis- cussed at the local skin MDT and patients offered further excision. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.07.132 P31 Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) in Head and Neck Cancer Louise Dunphy , S. Parmar, T. Martin, P. Praveen. The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham Introduction: Intensity modulated radiation therapy rep- resents a novel treatment option with a potential capacity for better loco-regional recurrence in inoperable disease. Organ motion is virtually absent in the head and neck, so with proper immobilization, treatment can be accurately delivered.Improved loco-regional outcome following IMRT has been reported for nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal tumours. Despite this, toxicities still remain. Aim: To assess toxicities in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma following IMRT. Methods: A retrospective review of head and neck can- cer patients treated with IMRT from January 1st-December 31st 2013. General indications for postoperative radiation included locally advanced disease, positive surgical margins, involvement of 2 or more lymph nodes or extra-capsular extension,respectively.If simultaneous chemotherapy was provided it was documented.

Upload: kumara

Post on 18-Feb-2017

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A study to compare the use of wide bore nasogastric feeding tubes compared to fine bore nasogastric feeding tubes for the purpose of feeding and medication administration inserted

P21 / British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 52 (2014) e75–e127 e85

P29

A study to compare the use of wide bore nasogastric feed-ing tubes compared to fine bore nasogastric feeding tubesfor the purpose of feeding and medication administrationinserted peri- operatively for head and neck oncologicalresections

Damian Broderick ∗, L.F.A. Stassen, Kumara Ekanayake

St James’s Hospital Dublin

Introduction: The objective of the study was to determineany clinical or patient perceived benefit to using a wide borenasogastric (NG) tube following a head and neck oncologicalresection. (Ethical approval received). Fine bore tubes getblocked following use and sometimes require removal andreplacing. Wide bore tubes have the advantage of minimalblockage they can be more uncomfortable. Variation existsbetween head and neck surgeons as to which NG is used.

Materials/Methods: Patients assigned randomly to thosehaving a wide bore NG tube or a fine bore tube. There aretwo treatment groups. Collection of information required theuse of three forms. The first form was completed by sur-geon/anaesthetist placing NG tube, the second by nursingstaff on the ward and the third by patients on removal of theNG tube. Each form has a study reference number to allowthe information to be collated. 32 patients were included inthe study. 17 had a wide bore tube, 15 had narrow bore.

Results/Statistics: Statistical analysis is ongoing, how-ever the trend reveals that wide bore tubes never blocked andnever needed to be replaced for this reason. Patients howeverfound them more uncomfortable. Narrow bore tubes fre-quently blocked with increased time demands on nurses/teamto unblock/replace, with increased radiographical exposure.

Conclusion/relevance: Given the increased risk of block-ing of narrow bore NG tubes it is our view that where tolerateda wide bore NG tube should be used for feeding purposes inthe post operative period.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.07.131

P30

A review of 1500 consecutive skin malignancy excisions:the East Lancashire experience

Kenneth Corsar ∗, C. Sweet, C. Johnston, K. Mcalister, G.Chiu

Royal Blackburn Hospital

Introduction: basal cell carcinoma is the most com-mon skin malignancy in Western World with Squamous cellcarcinoma being the second most common. Despite othertreatment being available surgery still plays the major role intreatment of these cancers.

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective studyof all malignant head and neck skin lesions that were excised

between Jan 2009-Dec 2013. Potential cases were identifiedby the pathology laboratory and recorded and stored on theEast Lancashire skin database.

All incisional and punch biopsies were excluded from thestudy.

Excisions were defined as “incomplete” when the tumourwas reported as being present at the lateral or deep resectionmargins.

Results: 1500 malignant skin neoplasms were excisedfrom 1312 patients. 94% of these malignancies were basalcell carcinoma, 16% were squamous cell carcinoma. Of theselesions <5% were incompletely excised

Conclusions: Our incomplete excision rate comparesfavourably with previously published results which variesbetween 5-20%.

Incompletely excised lesions were more commonly seenin the central face region and were of “high risk” as definedby BAD guidelines.

Reasons for this were due to narrower margins takenin these areas due to a lack of available tissues forreconstruction, more aggressive histological subtypes oftumour and subclinical spread occurring in the centralface.

Our study did not look at the grade of surgeon carryingout these procedures which may have influenced the results.

All lesions which were incompletely excised were dis-cussed at the local skin MDT and patients offered furtherexcision.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.07.132

P31

Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) in Headand Neck Cancer

Louise Dunphy ∗, S. Parmar, T. Martin, P. Praveen.

The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham

Introduction: Intensity modulated radiation therapy rep-resents a novel treatment option with a potential capacityfor better loco-regional recurrence in inoperable disease.Organ motion is virtually absent in the head and neck, sowith proper immobilization, treatment can be accuratelydelivered.Improved loco-regional outcome following IMRThas been reported for nasopharyngeal and oropharyngealtumours. Despite this, toxicities still remain.

Aim: To assess toxicities in head and neck squamous cellcarcinoma following IMRT.

Methods: A retrospective review of head and neck can-cer patients treated with IMRT from January 1st-December31st 2013. General indications for postoperative radiationincluded locally advanced disease, positive surgical margins,involvement of 2 or more lymph nodes or extra-capsularextension,respectively.If simultaneous chemotherapy wasprovided it was documented.