a sociolinguistic analysis of graffiti in secondary

7
A SOCIOLINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF GRAFFITI IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS: A CASE STUDY OF SELECTED SCHOOLS IN NYANDARUA DISTRICT KAN JUKI AGNES W. AM13/1121/04 A project submitted to the Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Master of Arts in English Language and Linguistics of Egerton University

Upload: eugenia-spetsiotou-melliou

Post on 25-May-2015

637 views

Category:

Documents


10 download

DESCRIPTION

Graffiti: Μελέτη περίπτωσης. Βιβλιογραφία για την εργασία:Ο τοίχος έχει την δική του ιστορία

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A sociolinguistic analysis of graffiti in secondary

A SOCIOLINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF GRAFFITI IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS: A CASE STUDY OF SELECTED SCHOOLS IN NYANDARUA DISTRICT

KAN JUKI AGNES W. AM13/1121/04

A project submitted to the Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Master of Arts in English Language and Linguistics of Egerton University

Page 2: A sociolinguistic analysis of graffiti in secondary

ABSTRACT

Graffiti assume the form of written language or drawings on surfaces in public places. Their authorship is private and the writers are anonymous. They are often viewed as illegal, and are interpreted as a challenge and threat to existing authority in a context where one group exerts influence over another. Graffiti are however a form of public communication. Their authors who are usually denied other channels of communication use them as avenues for self-expression and to pass across messages on real-life issues affecting them. Students in secondary schools in Kenya are one such group that use graffiti to express their opinions. Since they do not always enjoy the privilege of making decisions or taking part in discussions on matters affecting them, they fall back on graffiti as an alternative medium of communication. The current study set out to investigate and identify graffiti, describe their stylistic features, find out the messages they put across and establish different attitudes towards graffiti. The study was based on the hypotheses that graffiti use specific stylistic features of language, are used to communicate messages on social issues and that students and teachers have different attitudes towards their writing. Texts were collected in ten secondary schools in Nyandarua District. Out of these two hundred texts; twenty from each school, were purposively sampled for analysis. Two teachers and five students from each school were interviewed using different interview schedules. The data elicited from this exercise was later analysed qualitatively and quantitatively to arrive at inferences and conclusions. The research was limited to a socio-linguistic approach to the study of graffiti in secondary schools. The study was guided by Leech's Model of Stylistic Analysis and Critical Discourse Analysis. The findings were that graffiti used unique stylistic devices such as capitalization, short word forms, figurative language and symbolism among others. Graffiti also communicate messages on various topics to include love and sex, school authority, student welfare, religion and politics. The findings of this research contribute to the study of linguistics in general, and particularly to the fields of Stylistics, Discourse Studies and Sociolinguistics by giving an analysis of language use in society. It is also relevant and useful to secondary school policy-makers, administrators and teachers who will gain knowledge on the meaning of graffiti which they will use to understand the students.

« vii

Page 3: A sociolinguistic analysis of graffiti in secondary

TABLE OF CONTENT

PAGE Title page (i) Declaration and Approval . (ii) Copyright (iii) Dedication (iv) Acknowledgement (v) Abstract (vii) Table of Contents (viii) Definition of Terms . (xiii) List of Tables and Figures (xiv)

CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background to the Study 1 1.2 Statement of the Problem 2 1.3 Objectives of the Study 2 1.4 Hypothesis of the Study 2 1.5 Significance of the Study 3 1.6 Scope of the Study 3 1.7 Limitations of the Study 3

•f

i

vm

Page 4: A sociolinguistic analysis of graffiti in secondary

CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW 2.0 Introduction 4 2.1 General Views on Graffiti 4

2.1.1 History and Scope of Graffiti 4 2.1.2 Different Attitudes Towards Graffiti 5

2.1.2.1 Negative Attitudes 6 2.1.2.2 Positive Attitudes 7 2.1.2.3 Implications of the Definitions 9

2.1.3 Types of Graffiti 11 2.1.3.1 Political Graffiti 11 2.1.3.2 Existential Graffiti 12 2.1.3.3 Gang Graffiti 12 2.1.3.4 Summary on Types of Graffiti 13

2.1.4 Different Approaches to the Study of Graffiti 13 2.2 Theoretical Framework 16

2.2.1 Critical Discourse Analysis 16 2.2.2 Leech's Model of Stylistic Analysis 19

CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY 3.0 Introduction 21 3.1 Data Collection Techniques 21

3.1.1 Sampling Procedures 21 3.1.1.1 Sampling Schools 21 3.1.1.2 Sampling Graffiti Texts 22 3.1.1.3 S ampling Respondents 22 3.1.1.4 Accessing the Schools 23

x

Page 5: A sociolinguistic analysis of graffiti in secondary

3.1.2 Tools For Data Collection 24 3.1.2.1 Unstructured Interviews 24 3.1.2.2 Field Notes 24

3.2 Data Recording 25 3.2.1 Types of Data 25 3.2.2 Written Records 25 3.2.3 Audio Recording 25 3.2.4 Photography 26 3.2.5 Limitations 26 3.2.6 Ethical Issues 26

3.3 Techniques used in Analysis 27 3.3.1 Transcription, Presentation and Analysis of Data 27

CHAPTER FOUR: THE LANGUAGE OF GRAFFITI 4.0 Introduction 29 4.1 Attitudes Towards Graffiti 29

4.1.1 Students' Attitudes Towards Graffiti 29 4.1.2 Teachers' Attitudes Towards Graffiti 30 4.1.3 Summary on Attitudes Towards Graffiti 31

4.2 Linguistic Analysis of Graffiti 32 4.2.1 Sample Analysis of a Graffito 32 4.2.2 Language Choices in Graffiti 34

4.2.2.1 Sheng 34 4.2.2.2 English 36 4.2.2.3 Kiswahili 37 4.2.2.4 Vernacular 38 4.2.2.5 Summary on Language Choices in Graffiti 39

Page 6: A sociolinguistic analysis of graffiti in secondary

4 2.3 Graphological Analysis of Graffiti 39 4.2.3.1 Scribbles and Drawings 39 4.2.3.2 Use of Punctuation 42

4.2.4 Syntactic Analysis of Graffiti Texts 44 4.2.5 Stylistic Features in Graffiti Texts 46

4.2.5.1 Repetition 46 4.2.5.2 Short Word forms 47 4.2.5.3 Use of Nicknames 48 4.2.5.4 Slogans 49 4.2.5.5 Humour 50 4.2.5.6 Figurative Language 50 4.2.5.7 Symbolism 51 4.2.5.8 Taboo Language 52

4.3 Summary of Linguistic Analysis of Graffiti 53

CHAPTER FIVE: THE SOCIAL MESSAGES EXPRESSED IN GRAFFITI 5.0 Introduction 54 5.1 Sources of Graffiti 54

5.1.1 Classroom 54 5.1.2 Laboratory 55 5.1.3 Dormitory 55 5.1.4 Ablution 55 5.1.5 Dining Hall 56 5.1.6 Library 56

5.2 Social Messages in Graffiti 57 5.2.1 Messages on Love and Sex 58

5.2.1.1 Messages on Sex 58 5.2.1.2 Love Declarations 61 5.2.1.3 Summary of Messages on Love and Sex 63

Page 7: A sociolinguistic analysis of graffiti in secondary

5 2.2 Messages on School Authority 63 5.2.2.1 Attitudes Towards Teachers 63 5.2.2.2 Attitudes Towards Prefects 67 5.2.2.3 Summary of Messages on School Authority 68

5.2.3 Messages on Student Welfare 68 5.2.4 Messages on Drugs 71 5.2.5 Messages on Religion 73 5.2.6 Messages on Celebrities 73 5.2.7 Messages on Politics 74 5.2.8 Summary of Social Messages 75

CHAPTER SIX: SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6.0 Introduction 77 6.1 Summary 77 6.2 Conclusions 78

6.2.1 The Language of Graffiti 78 6.2.1.1 Stylistic Features in Graffiti 78 6.2.1.2 Social Messages in Graffiti 79 6.2.1.3 Attitudes Towards Graffiti 80

6.3 Contributions of the Study 80 6.4 Problems in Research 81 6.5 Recommendations for Further Study 81

BIBLIOGRAPHY 82 APPENDIX I Interview Schedule for Teachers 85 APPENDIX II Interview Schedule for Students 86 APPENDIX in Provided List of Graffiti Texts 87 APPENDIX IV List of Graffiti Texts 88 APPENDIX V Research Permit

xii