a social indicators project supported by the foundation for child development
DESCRIPTION
The Foundation for Child Development Child and Youth Well-Being Index (CWI) 1975 to 2004 with Projections for 2005. A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development Brookings Presentation, March 28, 2006 Kenneth C. Land, Ph.D., Project Coordinator Duke University. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
FCD CWI
The Foundation for Child Development
Child and Youth Well-Being Index (CWI)1975 to 2004 with Projections for 2005
A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development Brookings Presentation, March 28, 2006
Kenneth C. Land, Ph.D., Project Coordinator
Duke University
2
FCD CWI
What is the CWI?
• A composite measure of trends over time in the quality of life, or well-being, of America’s children and young people.
• It consists of several interrelated summary indices of annual time series of 28 social indicators of well-being.
3
FCD CWI
The Objective of the CWI:
• To give a sense of the overall direction of change in the well-being of children and youth in the United States as compared to 1975.
4
FCD CWI
The CWI is designed to address the following types of questions:
• Overall, on average, how did child and youth well-being in the United States change in the last quarter of the 20th century and into the present?
• Did it improve or deteriorate, and by how much?
• In which domains or areas of social life?
5
FCD CWI
• For specific age groups?
• For particular race/ethnic groups?
• For each of the sexes?
• And did race/ethnic group and sex disparities increase or decrease?
6
FCD CWI
Methods of Index Construction• Annual time series data (from vital statistics and sample
surveys) have been assembled on some 28 national level indicators in seven quality-of-life domains.– Family Economic Well-Being
– Health
– Safety/Behavioral Concerns
– Educational Attainment
– Community Connectedness
– Social Relationships (with Family and Peers)
– Emotional/Spiritual Well-Being
7
FCD CWI
• These seven domains have been well-established in over two decades of empirical studies of subjective well-being by social psychologists and other social scientists.
• In this sense, the CWI is an evidence-based measure of trends in averages of the social conditions encountered by children and youths in the United States.
8
FCD CWI
• Each of the 28 Key Indicators is indexed by percentage change from the base year, 1975.– That is, subsequent annual observations are
computed as percentages of the base year.– Three indicators begin in the mid-1980s and use
corresponding base years.
• The base year is assigned a value of 100. – The directions of the indicator values are oriented
such that a value greater (lesser) than 100 in subsequent years means the social condition measured has improved (deteriorated).
9
FCD CWI
• The time series of the 28 indicators are grouped together into the seven domains described above and domain-specific summary well-being indices are constructed.– Within these summary indices, each indicator is
equally weighted.
• The seven component indices are then combined into an equally-weighted summary index of child and youth well-being.
10
FCD CWI
Significant Findings
• The following charts show changes over time in the CWI and its various components.– Overall Index of Child Well-Being– Domain Specific Index: Educational Attainment
• Math Scores
• Reading Scores
– Effects of Demographic Standardization
11
FCD CWI
85
90
95
100
105
110
Perc
en
t o
f B
ase Y
ear
Year
Figure 1: Child and Youth Well-Being Index (CWI), 1975-2004, with Projections for 2005
12
FCD CWI
Figure 2. Domain-Specific Summary Indices, 1975-2004, with Projections for 2005.
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
Year
Perc
en
t o
f B
ase Y
ear
Family Economic Well-BeingHealthSafety/Behavioral ConcernsEducational AttainmentCommunity ConnectednessSocial RelationshipsEmotional/Spiritual Well-Being
13
FCD CWI
Focus: Educational Attainment Measures
• NAEP: National Assessment of Educational Progress -- the “Nation’s Report Card”– Supervised by the National Assessment
Governing Board.– Periodic assessment of student knowledge and
abilities in a number of subjects.– NAEP long-term trend assessments in Math
and Reading use the same testing instruments and procedures to replicate test results over time for children aged 9, 13, and 17.
14
FCD CWI
Figure 3. NAEP Math Scores, 1978-2004
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
Year
NA
EP
Mat
h S
core
Age 17
Age 13
Age 9
15
FCD CWI
Figure 4. NAEP Reading Scores, 1975-2004
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
Year
NA
EP
Rea
din
g S
core
Age 17
Age 13
Age 9
16
FCD CWI
The Interrelationship of Trends in Education and Educational Attainment
• Are pre-Kindergarten enrollment rates leading indicators for Age-9 test scores?
17
FCD CWI
Figure 5. Percent Enrolled in Pre-Kindergarten, Ages 3-4 and NAEP Mathematics and Reading Scores, Age 9, 1990-2004
0
7
14
21
28
35
42
49
56
63
Year
Per
cen
t in
Pre
-Kin
der
gar
ten
205
210
215
220
225
230
235
240
245
250
NA
EP
Sco
re
Percent of Children, Ages 3-4, in Pre-Kindergarten
NAEP Math Scores, Age 9
NAEP Reading Scores, Age 9
18
FCD CWI
Demographic Standardization
• A technique for examining how a trend might be affected if the characteristics of the students had not changed over time:– For example, what would the math trend be if
the race/ethnic composition of schools had remained the same as in 1978?
• Thus, standardization controls for the effects of compositional changes on overall rates.
19
FCD CWI
The Impacts of Changes in Student Composition since the 1970s on
NAEP Test Scores
Two significant changes are studied here:
1. Changes in the racial and ethnic composition of U.S. students.
20
FCD CWI
Figure 6. Changing Racial/Ethnic Distribution of NAEP Students Age 17, 1978-2004
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Year
Per
cen
t
White
Black
Hispanic
Other
21
FCD CWI
The Impacts of Changes in Student Composition since the 1970s on
NAEP Test Scores
Two significant changes are studied here:
1. Changes in the racial and ethnic composition of U.S. students.
2. Changes in parents’ level of educational attainment.
22
FCD CWI
Figure 7. Changing Distribution of Parents' Highest Level of Education for NAEP Students Age 17, 1978-2004
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Year
Per
cen
t o
f st
ud
ents
College graduate
HS graduate
Post HS education
Less than HS diploma
23
FCD CWI
Figure 8. NAEP Math Scores, Age 17: As Reported and Standardized to 1978 and 2004 Racial/Ethnic Distributions
296
298
300
302
304
306
308
310
312
Year
NA
EP
Mat
h S
core
Standardized to 1978 Racial/Ethnic Distribution
Reported NAEP Math Scores
Standardized to 2004 Racial/Ethnic Distribution
24
FCD CWI
Figure 9. NAEP Math Scores, Age 17: As Reported and Standardized to 1978 and 2004 Parents' Highest Level of Education
296
298
300
302
304
306
308
310
312
Year
NA
EP
Mat
h S
core
Standardized to 2004 Parental Education Levels
Reported NAEP Math Score
Standardized to 1978 Parental Education Levels
25
FCD CWI
Figure 10. NAEP Reading Scores, Age 17: As Reported and Standardized to 1980 and 2004 Racial/Ethnic Distribution
279
281
283
285
287
289
291
293
Year
NA
EP
Rea
din
g S
core
Standardized to 1980 Racial/Ethnic Distribution
Reported NAEP Reading Scores
Standardized to 2004 Racial/Ethnic Distribution
26
FCD CWI
Figure 11. NAEP Reading Scores, Age 17: As Reported and Standardized to 1980 and 2004 Parents' Highest Level of Education
279
281
283
285
287
289
291
293
Year
NA
EP
Rea
din
g S
core
Standardized to 2004 Parental Education Levels
Reported NAEP Reading Scores
Standardized to 1980 Parental Education Levels
27
FCD CWI
Conclusions• The overall well-being of children and youth in the
United States showed substantial improvement for the ten years from 1994 to 2003.– These improvements continued at a slow pace in 2004, and
likely continued through 2005.
• Historically, however, the CWI showed a decline in well-being for a number of years in the 1980s and reached low points in 1993 and 1994.– These declines mirror economic restructuring, recessions,
and demographic changes.
• Only since the year 2000 has the CWI improved to above 1975 levels.
28
FCD CWI
Conclusions (cont.)• The Key Indicators in the Educational
Attainment Domain have shown only slight changes since the mid-1970s:– Math Scores:
• Slight improvement at all ages
– Reading Scores: • Some improvement for age 9
• Little change for age 13
• Decline for age 17
29
FCD CWI
Pre-Kindergarten Enrollment Rates and Test Scores
• There was a positive relationship between increases in pre-Kindergarten enrollment rates in the 1990s and increases in age-9 NAEP mathematics and reading scores in the early-2000s.
• This suggests that increases in pre-K enrollment rates at ages 3 to 4 were leading indicators of the increase in the test scores for 9-year olds a few years later.
30
FCD CWI
Effects of the Changing Mix of Students
• Our demographic standardization analyses show:Improvements in parents’ education have had
positive effects on student math scores.The changing racial/ethnic distribution of
students has had a smaller effect on test scores.There has been a general downturn in age 17
reading test scores since 1992; the downturn would have been larger without increases in parental education levels over the past three decades.
31
FCD CWI
Implications
• If the positive association of pre-Kindergarten enrollments and age-9 NAEP test scores continues to hold, it can be anticipated that further increases in pre-K enrollments will result (with a 5 to 6 year lag) in continued improvements in the age-9 test scores.
32
FCD CWI
Implications, Cont.• Improvements in parental educational attainments
are partially transferred to the abilities of their children in mathematics and reading; this is consistent with over four decades of research on intergenerational socioeconomic status transfers.
• The increases in rates of college graduation of young adults in the 1990s should lead to higher math test scores as they rear children over the next decade.
• Increases in education levels for minority parents should reduce race/ethnic disparities in future test scores.
33
FCD CWI
Implications, Cont.• Further research on the downturn in reading
test scores for 17-year olds is required to explain the declines over the past decade.– For instance, we do not know the extent to
which the decline is related to the widespread use of new media for entertainment (e.g., video games, the Internet) and corresponding declines in time devoted to reading and the extent to which such changes are reversible.
34
FCD CWI
The CWI on the Web:
http://www.soc.duke.edu/~cwi/