a social indicators project supported by the foundation for child development

34
1 FCD CWI The Foundation for Child Development Child and Youth Well-Being Index (CWI) 1975 to 2004 with Projections for 2005 A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development Brookings Presentation, March 28, 2006 Kenneth C. Land, Ph.D., Project Coordinator Duke University

Upload: inga-blevins

Post on 03-Jan-2016

23 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The Foundation for Child Development Child and Youth Well-Being Index (CWI) 1975 to 2004 with Projections for 2005. A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development Brookings Presentation, March 28, 2006 Kenneth C. Land, Ph.D., Project Coordinator Duke University. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

1

FCD CWI

The Foundation for Child Development

Child and Youth Well-Being Index (CWI)1975 to 2004 with Projections for 2005

A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development Brookings Presentation, March 28, 2006

Kenneth C. Land, Ph.D., Project Coordinator

Duke University

Page 2: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

2

FCD CWI

What is the CWI?

• A composite measure of trends over time in the quality of life, or well-being, of America’s children and young people.

• It consists of several interrelated summary indices of annual time series of 28 social indicators of well-being.

Page 3: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

3

FCD CWI

The Objective of the CWI:

• To give a sense of the overall direction of change in the well-being of children and youth in the United States as compared to 1975.

Page 4: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

4

FCD CWI

The CWI is designed to address the following types of questions:

• Overall, on average, how did child and youth well-being in the United States change in the last quarter of the 20th century and into the present?

• Did it improve or deteriorate, and by how much?

• In which domains or areas of social life?

Page 5: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

5

FCD CWI

• For specific age groups?

• For particular race/ethnic groups?

• For each of the sexes?

• And did race/ethnic group and sex disparities increase or decrease?

Page 6: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

6

FCD CWI

Methods of Index Construction• Annual time series data (from vital statistics and sample

surveys) have been assembled on some 28 national level indicators in seven quality-of-life domains.– Family Economic Well-Being

– Health

– Safety/Behavioral Concerns

– Educational Attainment

– Community Connectedness

– Social Relationships (with Family and Peers)

– Emotional/Spiritual Well-Being

Page 7: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

7

FCD CWI

• These seven domains have been well-established in over two decades of empirical studies of subjective well-being by social psychologists and other social scientists.

• In this sense, the CWI is an evidence-based measure of trends in averages of the social conditions encountered by children and youths in the United States.

Page 8: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

8

FCD CWI

• Each of the 28 Key Indicators is indexed by percentage change from the base year, 1975.– That is, subsequent annual observations are

computed as percentages of the base year.– Three indicators begin in the mid-1980s and use

corresponding base years.

• The base year is assigned a value of 100. – The directions of the indicator values are oriented

such that a value greater (lesser) than 100 in subsequent years means the social condition measured has improved (deteriorated).

Page 9: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

9

FCD CWI

• The time series of the 28 indicators are grouped together into the seven domains described above and domain-specific summary well-being indices are constructed.– Within these summary indices, each indicator is

equally weighted.

• The seven component indices are then combined into an equally-weighted summary index of child and youth well-being.

Page 10: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

10

FCD CWI

Significant Findings

• The following charts show changes over time in the CWI and its various components.– Overall Index of Child Well-Being– Domain Specific Index: Educational Attainment

• Math Scores

• Reading Scores

– Effects of Demographic Standardization

Page 11: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

11

FCD CWI

85

90

95

100

105

110

Perc

en

t o

f B

ase Y

ear

Year

Figure 1: Child and Youth Well-Being Index (CWI), 1975-2004, with Projections for 2005

Page 12: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

12

FCD CWI

Figure 2. Domain-Specific Summary Indices, 1975-2004, with Projections for 2005.

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

Year

Perc

en

t o

f B

ase Y

ear

Family Economic Well-BeingHealthSafety/Behavioral ConcernsEducational AttainmentCommunity ConnectednessSocial RelationshipsEmotional/Spiritual Well-Being

Page 13: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

13

FCD CWI

Focus: Educational Attainment Measures

• NAEP: National Assessment of Educational Progress -- the “Nation’s Report Card”– Supervised by the National Assessment

Governing Board.– Periodic assessment of student knowledge and

abilities in a number of subjects.– NAEP long-term trend assessments in Math

and Reading use the same testing instruments and procedures to replicate test results over time for children aged 9, 13, and 17.

Page 14: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

14

FCD CWI

Figure 3. NAEP Math Scores, 1978-2004

200

220

240

260

280

300

320

Year

NA

EP

Mat

h S

core

Age 17

Age 13

Age 9

Page 15: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

15

FCD CWI

Figure 4. NAEP Reading Scores, 1975-2004

200

220

240

260

280

300

320

Year

NA

EP

Rea

din

g S

core

Age 17

Age 13

Age 9

Page 16: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

16

FCD CWI

The Interrelationship of Trends in Education and Educational Attainment

• Are pre-Kindergarten enrollment rates leading indicators for Age-9 test scores?

Page 17: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

17

FCD CWI

Figure 5. Percent Enrolled in Pre-Kindergarten, Ages 3-4 and NAEP Mathematics and Reading Scores, Age 9, 1990-2004

0

7

14

21

28

35

42

49

56

63

Year

Per

cen

t in

Pre

-Kin

der

gar

ten

205

210

215

220

225

230

235

240

245

250

NA

EP

Sco

re

Percent of Children, Ages 3-4, in Pre-Kindergarten

NAEP Math Scores, Age 9

NAEP Reading Scores, Age 9

Page 18: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

18

FCD CWI

Demographic Standardization

• A technique for examining how a trend might be affected if the characteristics of the students had not changed over time:– For example, what would the math trend be if

the race/ethnic composition of schools had remained the same as in 1978?

• Thus, standardization controls for the effects of compositional changes on overall rates.

Page 19: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

19

FCD CWI

The Impacts of Changes in Student Composition since the 1970s on

NAEP Test Scores

Two significant changes are studied here:

1. Changes in the racial and ethnic composition of U.S. students.

Page 20: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

20

FCD CWI

Figure 6. Changing Racial/Ethnic Distribution of NAEP Students Age 17, 1978-2004

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Year

Per

cen

t

White

Black

Hispanic

Other

Page 21: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

21

FCD CWI

The Impacts of Changes in Student Composition since the 1970s on

NAEP Test Scores

Two significant changes are studied here:

1. Changes in the racial and ethnic composition of U.S. students.

2. Changes in parents’ level of educational attainment.

Page 22: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

22

FCD CWI

Figure 7. Changing Distribution of Parents' Highest Level of Education for NAEP Students Age 17, 1978-2004

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Year

Per

cen

t o

f st

ud

ents

College graduate

HS graduate

Post HS education

Less than HS diploma

Page 23: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

23

FCD CWI

Figure 8. NAEP Math Scores, Age 17: As Reported and Standardized to 1978 and 2004 Racial/Ethnic Distributions

296

298

300

302

304

306

308

310

312

Year

NA

EP

Mat

h S

core

Standardized to 1978 Racial/Ethnic Distribution

Reported NAEP Math Scores

Standardized to 2004 Racial/Ethnic Distribution

Page 24: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

24

FCD CWI

Figure 9. NAEP Math Scores, Age 17: As Reported and Standardized to 1978 and 2004 Parents' Highest Level of Education

296

298

300

302

304

306

308

310

312

Year

NA

EP

Mat

h S

core

Standardized to 2004 Parental Education Levels

Reported NAEP Math Score

Standardized to 1978 Parental Education Levels

Page 25: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

25

FCD CWI

Figure 10. NAEP Reading Scores, Age 17: As Reported and Standardized to 1980 and 2004 Racial/Ethnic Distribution

279

281

283

285

287

289

291

293

Year

NA

EP

Rea

din

g S

core

Standardized to 1980 Racial/Ethnic Distribution

Reported NAEP Reading Scores

Standardized to 2004 Racial/Ethnic Distribution

Page 26: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

26

FCD CWI

Figure 11. NAEP Reading Scores, Age 17: As Reported and Standardized to 1980 and 2004 Parents' Highest Level of Education

279

281

283

285

287

289

291

293

Year

NA

EP

Rea

din

g S

core

Standardized to 2004 Parental Education Levels

Reported NAEP Reading Scores

Standardized to 1980 Parental Education Levels

Page 27: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

27

FCD CWI

Conclusions• The overall well-being of children and youth in the

United States showed substantial improvement for the ten years from 1994 to 2003.– These improvements continued at a slow pace in 2004, and

likely continued through 2005.

• Historically, however, the CWI showed a decline in well-being for a number of years in the 1980s and reached low points in 1993 and 1994.– These declines mirror economic restructuring, recessions,

and demographic changes.

• Only since the year 2000 has the CWI improved to above 1975 levels.

Page 28: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

28

FCD CWI

Conclusions (cont.)• The Key Indicators in the Educational

Attainment Domain have shown only slight changes since the mid-1970s:– Math Scores:

• Slight improvement at all ages

– Reading Scores: • Some improvement for age 9

• Little change for age 13

• Decline for age 17

Page 29: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

29

FCD CWI

Pre-Kindergarten Enrollment Rates and Test Scores

• There was a positive relationship between increases in pre-Kindergarten enrollment rates in the 1990s and increases in age-9 NAEP mathematics and reading scores in the early-2000s.

• This suggests that increases in pre-K enrollment rates at ages 3 to 4 were leading indicators of the increase in the test scores for 9-year olds a few years later.

Page 30: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

30

FCD CWI

Effects of the Changing Mix of Students

• Our demographic standardization analyses show:Improvements in parents’ education have had

positive effects on student math scores.The changing racial/ethnic distribution of

students has had a smaller effect on test scores.There has been a general downturn in age 17

reading test scores since 1992; the downturn would have been larger without increases in parental education levels over the past three decades.

Page 31: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

31

FCD CWI

Implications

• If the positive association of pre-Kindergarten enrollments and age-9 NAEP test scores continues to hold, it can be anticipated that further increases in pre-K enrollments will result (with a 5 to 6 year lag) in continued improvements in the age-9 test scores.

Page 32: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

32

FCD CWI

Implications, Cont.• Improvements in parental educational attainments

are partially transferred to the abilities of their children in mathematics and reading; this is consistent with over four decades of research on intergenerational socioeconomic status transfers.

• The increases in rates of college graduation of young adults in the 1990s should lead to higher math test scores as they rear children over the next decade.

• Increases in education levels for minority parents should reduce race/ethnic disparities in future test scores.

Page 33: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

33

FCD CWI

Implications, Cont.• Further research on the downturn in reading

test scores for 17-year olds is required to explain the declines over the past decade.– For instance, we do not know the extent to

which the decline is related to the widespread use of new media for entertainment (e.g., video games, the Internet) and corresponding declines in time devoted to reading and the extent to which such changes are reversible.

Page 34: A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

34

FCD CWI

The CWI on the Web:

http://www.soc.duke.edu/~cwi/