a simplified equilibrium hydrocarbon-air combustion …€¦ · a simplified equilibrium...
TRANSCRIPT
NASA
P_
!
Zk--
Z
TECHNICAL NOTE NASA TN D-4747
A SIMPLIFIED EQUILIBRIUM
HYDROCARBON-AIR COMBUSTION
GAS MODEL FOR USE IN AIR-BREATHING
ENGINE CYCLE COMPUTER PROGRAMS
by Vincent R. 3Iascitti
Langley Research Center
Langle 5 Station, Hampton, Va.
NATIONALAERONAUTICSAND SPACEADMINISTRATION• WASHINGTON,D. C. • SEPTEMBER1968
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19680025643 2020-05-12T07:23:30+00:00Z
NASA TN D-4747
A SIMPLIFIED EQUILIBRIUM HYDROCARBON-AIR
COMBUSTION GAS MODEL FOR USE IN AIR-BREATHING
ENGINE CYCLE COMPUTER PROGRAMS
By Vincent R. Mascitti
Langley Research Center
Langley Station, Hampton, Va.
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
For sale by the Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information
Springfield, Virginia 22151 - CFSTI price $3.00
A SIMPLIFIED EQUILIBRIUM HYDROCARBON-AIR
COMBUSTION GAS MODEL FOR USE IN AIR-BREATHING
ENGINE CYCLE COMPUTER PROGRAMS
By Vincent R. Mascitti
Langley Research Center
SUMMARY
This paper presents a simplified hydrocarbon-air combustion gas model, including
the effects of dissociation, for convenient use in engine cycle computer programs. The
generalized model reduces to the hydrogen-air system as well as to the dissociating-air
system. The exclusion of chemical species containing atomic nitrogen allows a consider-
able simplification of the composition equations. The thermodynamic properties of stoi-
chiometric combustion of the kerosene-air and hydrogen-air systems are computed with
the simplified model and compared with those of more comprehensive gas models. In
addition, the effect of the neglected chemical species on the performance of an idealized
subsonic combustion ramjet is presented. The simplified gas model has been used to
define the limiting conditions for solid carbon and ammonia formation for fuel-rich gas
mixtures. A computer program listing of the calculation procedure for the simplified
gas model is presented.
INTRODUCTION
The current interest in supersonic and hypersonic vehicles has emphasized the need
for an accurate yet convenient method of calculation of the thermodynamic properties of
combustion gas mixtures. At high temperatures considerable iteration difficulties arise
in calculating the chemical composition and thermodynamic properties of combustion gas
mixtures, difficulties which stem from the phenomenon of internal energy excitation of
the species coupled with chemical dissociation.
In the past, methods such as the method presented in reference 1 have been used to
calculate the thermodynamic properties of combustion gases for air-breathing engine
cycle computations. The method of reference 1 is based on separate calculations of ther-
modynamic properties of air and the products of combustion of a stoichiometric fuel-air
mixture. It is assumed that the properties of the combustion products for any fuel-air
ratio that is less than stoichiometric may be obtained by linear interpolation between the
two extreme cases. Results of this methodare exact for nodissociation. Application ofthis methodto conditions in which dissociation occurs will only give approximate results.The deviation from anexact calculation is small for turbojet or turbofan calculationssince temperatures are relatively low anddissociation is not extensive. However, thehigh operating temperatures of hypersonic enginecycles may result in extreme dissocia-tion and causelarge errors in calculated engineperformance.
The methodof reference 1does not allow engine cycle calculations for equivalentratios aboveunity. However,at high Machnumber flight, the fuel required to cool aero-dynamic surfaces and enginecomponentsmayforce engineoperation into this region.
In short, the methodof reference 1does not provide a sufficiently general basisfor engine cycle calculations under all conditions of current andfuture interest.
Chemicalequilibrium theory which governsdissociation phenomenonhas beenfor-mulatedfor manyyears (for example, ref. 2). However, its application to complex com-bustion gasmixtures has proved so tedious and complicated as to preclude direct use inenginecycle computer programs. The combustiongas modelsof references 3 and4,which serve as a basis of comparison for the simplified gas modelpresentedherein, areelaborate treatments of the hydrogen-air andkerosene-air systems.
The generalized hydrogen-air modelof reference 3 assumes 12chemical speciesrequiring eight independentchemical reactions leadingto eight equilibrium expressions.Sincethe initial proportions of hydrogenandair define four mass balanceequations,themathematical solution (12equationsand 12unknowns)is demonstrated. The reduction ofthe system of equationsto one equationand oneunknown,as recommendedin reference 5,is extremely tedious. With the exclusion of the techniqueof reference 5, solution of thissystem by a single-level iteration is eliminated. The adoptionof a two-level iteration oroneof the methodssummarized in reference 6 to solve for gas composition hasa greateffect on the utility of the computationprocedure as a subroutine for anengine cycle com-puter program. Consequently,the most efficient meansof representing the thermody-namic properties of thesegas models in an enginecycle program is by an elaborate sys-tem of fitted curves which sacrifices both computer storage andaccuracy.
The purposeof the simplified gasmodel presentedherein is to incorporate the sub-stantial effects of dissociation consistentwith convenientuse in computerizedengine cyclecalculations. The proposedgasmodel is simplified by neglecting the formation of speciescontaining atomic nitrogen. This assumptionenablesthe solution for chemical composi-tion to be obtainedwith a single-level iteration. Althoughthe original intent of this studywasdirected toward the hydrogen-air system, it was foundthat the model could be gen-eralized to anyhydrocarbon-air system, as well as to a dissociating-air system, withlittle additional complexity. The computer program, presented in the appendix,canbereadily incorporated as a subroutine in an enginecycle program or usedalone to generate
2
Mollier diagrams. Inputs to the program are the ratio of carbon atoms to hydrogenatoms in the fuel molecule, equivalenceratio, temperature, andpressure. Outputsfromthe program are the mole fractions of the chemical species assumed,enthalpy, entropy,and molecular weight.
SYMBOLS
A,B
D, D1,D2__D3,D4 _)
Fnet
coefficients of iteration functions
initial atomic proportions
net thrust, lbf (N)
fuel-air ratio
fs
G
H
stoichiometric fuel-air ratio
acceleration due to gravitational field of earth, 32.174 ft/sec 2
Gibbs free energy, Btu/lbm (J/kg)
enthalpy, Btu/lbm (J/kg)
(9.807 m/sec2)
Isp
J
specific impulse, sec
mechanical equivalent of heat, 778.20 ft-lbf/Btu (9.991 N-m/J)
K equilibrium constant in terms of partial pressures; numerical subscripts
indicate individual reaction
M mean molecular weight
n ratio of hydrogen atoms to carbon atoms in fuel molecule
P
q
pressure, atm
dynamic pressure, lbf/ft 2 (N/m2)
R
rch
req
S
universal gas constant, 1.98588Btu/mole-°R (8.314J/mole-°K)
ratio of carbonatoms to hydrogenatoms in fuel molecule, 1/n
equivalenceratio, f/fs
entropy, Btu/lbm-°R (J/kg-°K)
T temperature, OR (OK)
V velocity, ft/sec
wA air flow rate, lbm/sec
X mole fraction
Subscripts:
oo free-stream conditions
J Jth species
j jet
lim
(m/sec)
(kg/sec)
limiting conditionfor solid carbon or ammonia formation
s static conditions
stagnation conditions
Superscript:
O at reference pressure of 1 atmosphere (1.01325 x 105 N/m 2)
DESCRIPTION OF GAS MODEL
The temperatures of interestfor air-breathing engine applicationare assumed to be
below 7000 ° R (3889 ° K) and the pressures are assumed to be between 0.001 and 100 atm.
For these conditions, references 3 and 4 indicate that the formation of nitrogen species,
4
suchas N, NH, NH3,and NO,occurs in negligible amountsand,therefore, has a verysmall effect on the thermodynamic properties of combustiongas mixtures. The assump-tion to neglect these speciesgreatly reduces the complexity of the calculation proceduresince molecular nitrogen canbe consideredinert. The results of this assumptionon thethermodynamic properties of gas mixtures andon the performance of an idealized ram-jet are discussed in a subsequentsection.
Figure 1is a diagram illustrating the chemical species and required chemicalreactions considered in this gasmodel. The figure is divided into regions of tempera-ture and equivalenceratio. Above Tcut_off, the gas is consideredto bedissociating.(Tcut_off is an arbitrarily definedlimit belowwhich dissociation canbe considerednegligible.) The chemical species assumedfor pure air (req = 0)are identical to those
of reference 3 and include atomic nitrogen species. For the combustion gas model
(req > 0), the dissociated nitrogen species (N, NH, NH3, NO)are not included. It is appar-
ent that by excluding the species and reaction containing carbon, the model reduces to
the hydrogen-air system.
Below Tcut_off , there is no dissociation and combustion is complete. Therefore,
the initial proportions of elements are sufficient to define the gas composition. However,
for req > 1, the gas model of reference 4 indicates that CO may form even below
Tcut_of f. As a result, the initial proportions of elements are not sufficient to define the
gas composition and one chemical reaction is required.
In this region of fuel-rich operation, solid carbon and ammonia may form. The
limiting pressure for the formation of solid carbon depends upon the relative proportions
of carbon dioxide CO 2 and carbon monoxide CO, equivalence ratio, and temperature.
However, there is a limiting equivalence ratio, for a given hydrocarbon-air system, above
which solid carbon can form under any condition.
The formation of ammonia was considered only for the hydrogen-air system since
the formation of sotid carbon precluded the formation of ammonia for the combustion
products of all the hydrocarbon-air systems studied. The limiting pressure for the for-
mation of a given amount of ammonia depends upon the relative proportion of nitrogen N 2
and hydrogen H2, equivalence ratio, and temperature.
DERIVATION OF GAS MODEL
Overall Stoichiometry and Gas Model Constants
In order to apply the simplified gas model to the combustion of any hydrocarbon
fuel, a generalized statement concerning the atomic composition of the fuel is required.
5
Consider the following stoichiometric reactions:
CH+_O2= CO2+21H20
CH2 + 6 02
CH3 + 7 02
In general terms,
where in a fuel molecule
Thus, in the general system,
= CO 2 + _ H20
= CO 2 + 3 H2 O
n + 4 n H20CH n+_O2= CO 2 +
No. atoms Hn=
No. atoms C
No. moles CHn_ 4recl_
No. moles 02 n + 4
where req is the equivalence ratio.
The initial composition of air incorporated in this gas model is the same as that of
reference 3; that is, combustion is assumed to have occurred with dry air of the following
composition by volume:
O 2 20.9495 percent
N 2 78.0881 percent
Ar 0.9624 percent
The following constants and parameters define, in general terms, the initial atomic pro-
portions of the elements in the gas mixture:
D1 = No. atoms Ar = 0.00616227No. atoms N
D2 = No. atoms N = 3.727445No. atoms O
D3 = No. atoms C _ 2reqNo. atoms O n + 4
D4 = No. atoms H_ 2nreqNo. atoms O n + 4
and a convenient parameter
D=I+D2(I+2D1)
1. thenDefine rch = _,
D 3 - 2reqrch1 + 4rch
2req
D4 - 1 + 4rch
For the special system of hydrogen-air combustion,
2H 2 + O 2 = 2H20
No. moles H2
No. moles O 2 2req
rch = 0 D 3 = 0 D4 = 2req
The stoichiometric fuel-air ratio is given by
fl 008 +
fs=0"028931 l" 1 +4rchl2"01rchl/
It is of value to represent the equilibrium constants for the assumed reactions in a
convenient manner. The treatment of chemical equilibria in reference 2 leads to the fol-
lowing equilibrium expression for a general reaction:
aA +bB = cC +dD
The equilibrium expression is
where
{ico o oGC GD GA - bK = exp _-_ + d _ - a _ RTJ/
Figure 2 shows the variation of lOgl0K with 1/T for the chemical reactions consid-o
Gj for the species were takenered in this gas model. The values of Gibbs free energy
from the data tabulations in references 3 and 4. Figure 2 indicates that the equilibrium
constants can be represented as linear functions.
With the initial proportions of the gas mixture elements defined and a convenient
representation of the equilibrium constants determined, the governing relations for chem-
ical composition can be formulated. Referring to figure 1 will aid the reader in the fol-
lowing derivations.
Hydrocarbon-Air Gas Model With Dissociation
The following gas model applies to the region T > Tcut_off,
Chemical species assumed
H20 , CO2, 02, H2, N2, Ar, O, H, CO, OH
Chemical reactions
2H + O = H20
2H = H 2
20 = O 2
O + CO = CO 2
H+O=OH
Mass conservation equations
10
(1) _ Xj=l
J=l
(2) XA = DI(2XN2 )
(3) 2XN2 = D2(2Xco 2 + XCO + XH20 + 2Xo2 + X O + XOH)
XCO 2 + XCO = D3(2Xco 2 + XCO + XH20 + 2Xo2 + X O + XOH )
X H + 2XH2 + 2XH2 O + XOH = D4(2Xco 2 + XCO + XH2 O + 2Xo2
(4)
req > 0:
(5) ÷ Xo ÷XoH)
Equilibrium expressions
(6) XH2 O = p2KlXoX2 H
(7) XH2 = PK2 x2
(8) Xo2 = PK3 x2
(9) XCO 2 = PK4XoXco
(10) XOH = PK5XoXH
Solving for two equations and two unknowns in X O and
o_= (A22X2 +A21Xo + A20)X2 + (A12X_) + A11Xo +A10)XH
/3= (B224 + B21Xo + B20)X2 +
where
A22=p3K1K4(1- 2D3 +D)
A_._: _(_ ÷D)+2K_._(_- _._31
A12 = p2K4K5(I - 2D 3 + D)
All=P_K5(I+D)+2K4(1-2D31
A01 =
A00 =
Setting
system.
A10=2(1-D3)
A03 = 2Dp2K3K4
1 + D- 2pK4(1 - 2D3)
-2(1-D31
D 3 and
X H gives
+ (A03X30 +A02_ + A01Xo +A00) = 0
(B12X2 + B1 lXo + BI0)XH - (B034 + B02X2 + BoIXO) = 0
B22 = p3K1K4_C1- 2D31-D41
B21 = p2_1_(1- D3)-D4_ + 2K2K4(1- 2D3)_
B2o--2pK2(1-D_
B12 = p2K4K5(1 - 2D 3 - D4)
BI, = PIK5(1-D3- D4)+ K4(I-2D3)_
B10 = 1 - D 3
B03 = 2D4p2K3K 4
B02 = D4P(2K3 + K4)
B01 = D4
K4 equal to zero reduces the system to identically the hydrogen-air
9
The expressionsforiteration scheme. Newton'siteration schemefor determining XOwritten as
and fl are satisfied simultaneously by use of the Newton
and X H can be
Xo(L + 1) = Xo(L) -
where Xo(L) is the Lth approximation of X 0 and the derivative of a(Xo, XH) with
respect to X 0 is
With Xo(L + 1) determined,
theorem to the expression for
do_ _ oo_ 8ot /_\81oAO I
dX 0 OX0 aXH_ 0/3 /
\0XH/
XH(L + 1) can be calculated by applying the binomial
/3. Although there may be a number of pairs of values
Xo, XH) which satisfy c_ = 0, there is only one pair which satisfies the condition
0 < Xj =<1. The initial value of Xo(L ) is taken to be 0 and the iteration scheme is
used until X O is determined to five significant figures.
For req > 1 the iteration function a is insensitive to changes in X O. As a
result, X H is used as the iteration variable in this region of computation. Unfortu-
nately, if X H is assumed, the expression for fl is cubic in X O and an additional
iteration is required. For fuel-rich hydrogen-air mixtures, B03 = 0, /3 is quadratic in
XO, and the single-level iteration is maintained. However, for fuel-rich mixtures con-
taining carbon, a two-level iteration is necessary for solution.
Air Gas Model With Dissociation
The following gas model applies to the region T > Tcut_off,
Chemical species assumed
O2, N2, Ar, O, NO, N
Chemical reactions
20 = O 2
2N = N 2
req = O:
N +O= NO
10
Mass conservation equations
6
(1) _ Xj = 1J=l
(2) X A = DI(2XN2 + XNO + XN)
(3/ 2x_2+X_o+xN--_2(2x02+Xo+XNo)
Equilibrium expressions
(4) XO2 = PK3X2
(5) XN2 = PK6 x2
(6) XNO = pKTXoXN
Solving for two equations and two unknowns in
a= A20X2 + (AllX O + A10)X N
_ _ox_+(_o +_o)x_-(_o_x_where
A20 = (1 + 2D1)PK 6
All = (1 + D1)PK 7
A10 = 1 + D 1
A02 = pK 3
A01 = 1
A00 = -1
X O and X N yields
+ (A02X _ + A01X O + A00 ) =0
+ B 0 lXo) = 0
The simultaneous solution of a and
for the hydrocarbon-air gas model.
B20 = 2pK 6
Bll = (1- D2)PK 7
B10 = 1
B02 = 2D2PK 3
B01 = D2
/3 is subject to the same iterationprocedure used
II
Fuel-Rich Gas Model With Solid Carbon Formation
The following gas model applies to the region T < Tcut_off, req > 1:
Chemical species assumed
H20, CO2, H2, N2, At, CO
Chemical reaction
H 2 +CO 2= CO+H20
Mass conservation equations
6
(1) _, Xj = 1
J=l
(2) X A = DI(2XN2 )
(3) 2XN2 = D2(2Xco 2 + XCO + XH20)
(4) XCO 2 + XCO = D3(2Xco 2 + XCO + XH2OI
(5) 2XH2 + 2XH2 O = D4(2Xco 2 + XCO + XH20)
Equilibrium expression
(6) XH2oXco = K8XH2Xco2
Solving for XCO yields
AAX20 + BBXco + CC = 0
where
BB=(D+D4+2D3- I)E2(I-2D3) +Ks(D4+6D3-21
CC= 2D3K8(2 - D 4 - 4D3)
With the chemical composition in this region defined, the criteria for solid carbon
formation can be formulated. Consider the reaction
CO 2 + C(Solid) = 2CO
and equilibrium expression
XCO 2
Plim = K9 X 2CO
12
If p > Plim' solid carbonwill form. There is, however, an equivalenceratio for thecombustionproducts of a given hydrocarbon(rch), where solid carbon can form even ina near vacuum. Consider the following equilibrium expression:
Setting XCO2gives
2PlimXCO = K9Xco 2
= 0 in the system for the fuel-rich gas model with solid carbon formation
1 + 4rch
req, lim - 2rch
Nondissociating Gas Model
The following gas model applies to the region T ---Tcut_off:
Chemical species assumed
H20 , CO2, 02, H2, N2, Ar
Mass conservation equations
6
(1) _-" Xj= 1L.._,'
J=l
(2) XAr = DI(2XN2 )
(3) 2xN2=D2(2Xco2÷X,20÷2Xo21
(4) XCO 2 = D3(2Xco 2 + XH20 + 2X02 )
(5) 2XH2 + 2XH20 = D4(2Xco 2 + XH20 + 2Xo2 )
In each of the regions req= 0, 0< req< i, and req= l, one or more of the species
can be eliminated; thus, for req = 0,
XH2 = 0
XCO 2 = 0
XH2 O = 0
Xj = Constants
13
for 0<req< 1,
XH2 = 0
Xj= Xj_rch, req/
andfor req= 1,
XH2 = 0
XO2 = 0
Xj= Xj(reh )
For the hydrogen-air system (rch = 0) with req > 1,
XO2 = 0
XCO 2 = 0
Xj= Xj(req )
With the chemical composition in this region, the condition for the formation of a given
amount of ammonia can be determined. Consider the reaction
N 2 + 3H 2 = 2NH 3
and equilibrium expression
X 2NH 3
= >
P2im K10X3H2XN2 (XNH 3 0.01, p> Plim)
Thermodynamic Properties of Gas Mixtures
The previous derivations have outlined the solution for gas mixture composition.
With the chemical composition defined and a tabulation of the thermodynamic properties
of the pure constituents provided, the thermodynamic properties of a gas mixture can be
calculated by the following equations (ref. 3):
-fi-J
S = R_X_R- in p - In Xj)J
= _ XjMjM
J
14
where _ and _- are the thermodynamicproperties of the pure constituents at refer-encepressure (1 atm). Thesethermodynamic expressions inherently assumethat thepure constituents obey the perfect gas law.
The standardreference state of the elements At, N, O, I-I,Ctaken from reference 3are as follows:
Ar as Ar
N as N2
Oas 02
H as H2
C as C(Solid)
By definition, the energy content of these elements in their standard reference states
(T = 0o R) is zero. Equations for the computation of fuel enthalpies, consistent with this
thermodynamic basis, are presented in reference 4.
A listing of the computer program to calculate the composition and thermodynamic
properties of this gas model is presented and discussed in the appendix. Computational
time for obtaining the chemical composition and thermodynamic properties with this pro-
gram has been estimated at 6000 cases/min on the IBM 7094 data processing system at
the Langley Research Center.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Comparison of Gas Models
The computer program for the simplified combustion gas model has been used to
calculate the thermodynamic properties of the stoichiometric kerosene-air and hydrogen-
air systems. The purpose of this calculation is to compare the results of the simplified
gas model with the more extensive treatments of references 3 and 4. Since the thermo-
dynamic properties of the pure constituents used in the simplified model were taken from
these references, the differences between the results of the simplified model and the ref-
erence models are due to the formation of the neglected chemical species N, NH, NH3,and NO.
Figure 3 is a Mollier diagram for the stoichiometric products of combustion of
kerosene with air (rch = 0.5). The solid-line curves are values plotted from the tabulated
data of reference 4. The dash-line curves are values obtained from the computer pro-
gram for the simplified model. Unfortunately, the data presented in reference 4 are lim-
ited to temperatures below 5000 ° R (2778 ° K). Since the formation of species including
15
atomic nitrogen (N, NH, andNH3)is more important at temperatures above5000° R, thegoodagreementbetweengasmodels is not surprising.
Figure 4 is a Mollier diagram for the stoichiometric products of combustionof
hydrogenwith air .(rch= 0). The solid-line curves are values plotted from the tabulateddata of reference 3. The dash-line curves are values obtained from the computer pro-
gram for the simplified model. The thermodynamic properties tabulated in reference 3
cover temperatures as high as 10 000 ° R (5560 ° K). The substantial disagreement above
7000 ° R (3889 ° K) at low pressures is due to the formation of species containing atomic
nitrogen. An interesting result is that the agreement between lines of constant pressure
is much better than the agreement between lines of constant temperature. This result is
fortunate since, for thermodynamic processes such as isentropic nozzle expansion, tem-
perature is not used directly to calculate performance.
The simultaneous conditions of high temperatures and low pressures, the area of
substantial disagreement between the simplified gas model and the reference gas models,
are beyond the realm of operation of typical hypersonic engine cycles. For example, for
subsonic combustion ramjets, combustion pressures and temperatures are high since the
airstream is brought nearly to stagnation conditions before combustion. For supersonic
combustion ramjets, combustion pressures and temperatures are low since a large por-
tion of the total air enthalpy remains in the form of kinetic energy. Hence, the conditions
of high temperatures and low pressures do not occur simultaneously for engine cycles
currently considered feasible for hypersonic flight.
Ramjet Performance
In applying the simplified gas model to hypersonic engine calculations, it is of inter-
est to determine the effect of the use of the simplified gas model on the calculated per-
formance of an idealized subsonic combustion ramjet.
Since the purpose of this calculation is to show the effect of small differences in
thermodynamic properties on ramjet performance, the following simplifying assumptions
were made:
(1) Free-stream Mach number chosen along a constant dynamic-pressure path
(q = 1500 lb/ft2 (718 200 N/m2))
(2) Airstream decelerated to stagnation conditions with total pressure recovery
degraded to 10 atm (due to internal duct pressure limitations at high Mach numbers)
(3) Completely mixed stoichiometric hydrogen-air combustion
(4) No pressure losses during combustion ,(Pt, nozzle= 10 atm)
16
(5) Enthalpyof injected hydrogen equals zero
Molecular hydrogen is a reference element; thus, I_H2 = 0 at T = 0 ° R.
(6) Combustion gas isentropically expanded to free-stream static conditions by
using so-called "shifting equilibrium"
The 1962 Standard Atmosphere (ref. 7) yields free-stream static conditions and with
assumption (1) gives the variation of altitude with Mach number shown in figure 5. For
steady adiabatic flow, the total energy in the airstream is given by
v5Ht, air= Hoo, air +_-_
For an adiabatic combustion process,
Ht, products= Ht_ air + fHt_hydrogenl+f
With two properties (Ht, products and Pt, nozzle) of the combustion gas defined, the
Mollier diagram can be entered. Figure 6 is a schematic of a Mollier diagram showing
lines of constant pressure for the simplified gas model and model of reference 3. Since
the simplified gas model neglects the dissociated nitrogen species, the entropy level is
slightly less than that obtained from reference 3. In expanding the combustion gas to
free-stream static pressure, the gas enters the region of almost exact agreement between
gas models. Consequently, the expansion using the simplified gas model gives a slightly
larger value of _H = Ht - H s than that from reference 3. However, the effect of the
difference in AH for the two calculations is reduced by the fact that
vj CHt-Hs
The performance parameters are given by the following expressions:
Fnet= (1 + f)Vj - Voow A
Fnet
Isp = wag f
The variation of specific impulse with Mach number for this idealized ramjet is presented
in figure 7. The solid-line curve was calculated by using the thermodynamic properties
of reference 3. The dash-line curve was calculated by using the computer program for
the simplified gas model. The maximum deviation is 1 percent at a Mach number of 12.
17
Solid CarbonandAmmonia Formation
The formation of solid carbon extracts useful energy from the combustiongas. Ifthis phenomenonoccurs during a nozzle expansionprocess, the useful energy absorbedinforming solid carbon is not recoverable and a loss in performance results.
The derivation of the nondissociating(T < Tcut_off) fuel-rich gasmodel requiredone chemical reaction in order to include the formation of carbon monoxideCO. Theequilibrium expression resulting from the required reaction is independentof pressure.Consequently,the composition of the gas in this region is independentof pressure. Thisfact simplifies the treatment of solid carbonformation, since the limiting pressure, abovewhich solid carbon can form, is related to temperature andcomposition only.
The computer program for the simplified gas model indicates the formation of solidcarbon by anerror statement. Whenthe limiting pressure is exceeded,the error state-ment is printed, but the program computesthe thermodynamic properties as thoughsolidcarbon had not formed. Whenthe limiting equivalenceratio is exceeded,the error state-ment is printed andno calculations are made. The limiting pressure for solid carbonformation is readily extracted from the thermodynamic calculations. Figures 8 to 10present the variation of limiting pressure with equivalenceratio andtemperature for
methane-air (rch = 0.25), kerosene-air (rch = 0.5), and benzene-air (rch = 1) combustion
products, respectively. For all systems, as
req - req, lim, Plim -* 0 since XCO 2 - 0
and as
req- 1, Plim- _ since XCO-0
The formation of ammonia is considered only for the hydrogen-air, nondissociating,
fuel-rich system. The composition of the gas, under these conditions, depend_ upon
equivalence ratio only. Therefore, the limiting pressure, above which the mole fraction
of ammonia is greater than some arbitrary amount, is related to temperature and
composition.
The computer program for the simplified gas model indicates the formation of
ammonia. (XNH 3 > 0.01) by an error statement. When the limiting pressure is exceeded,
the error statement is printed, but the program computes the thermodynamic properties
as though ammonia had not formed. Figure 11 presents the variation of limiting pressure
with equivalence ratio and temperature for hydrogen-air combustion products.
temperatures, as
req "* % Plim "* _ since
and as
For all
XN2 - 0
req-. 1, Plim- _ since XH2- 0
18
CONCLUDINGREMARKS
A simplified equilibrium hydrocarbon-air combustiongas model, for use in enginecycle computer programs, has beenpresented. The generalized gasmodel includes theeffects of dissociation andreduces to the special systems of hydrogen-air combustionproducts, as well as dissociating air. The associatedcomputer program canbe readilyincorporated as a subroutine in a general engine cycle computer program or used aloneto generateMollier diagrams.
With the exceptionof pure air, this gas modelneglects the formation of chemicalspecies containingatomic nitrogen; this assumptionallows a considerable simplificationof the solution for chemical composition. The effect of this assumptionon the thermo-dynamic properties of stoichiometric kerosene-air andhydrogen-air combustionproductsis presented. The importance of this assumptionis shownin terms of the performanceof an idealized subsoniccombustionramjet. Goodagreementbetweenthe simplifiedmodel and more comprehensivetreatments is obtainedin the range of temperaturesapplicable to hypersonic engine cycles.
The computer program hasbeenusedto calculate the limiting pressure for solidcarbon and ammoniaformation in fuel-rich gasmixtures. The results of this calculationare presentedas a function of temperature andequivalenceratio for the combustionprod-ucts of various hydrocarbonfuels.
Langley ResearchCenter,National Aeronautics and SpaceAdministration,
Langley Station, Hampton,Va., May 7, 1968,722-03-00-02-23.
19
APPENDIX
COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR CALCULATION OF GAS COMPOSITION
AND THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF
SIMPLIFIED GAS MODEL
The calculation procedure for determining gas composition and thermodynamic
properties for the simplified gas model has been programed for and used with the
IBM 7094 data processing system at the Langley Research Center. A printout of the
program is presented in this appendix. The program is written in FORTRAN IV lan-
guage (ref. 8). The symbols used for the program are as follows:
RCH rch X(1) XH20
REQ req X(2) XCO 2
TEMP W X(3) X02
P p X(4) XH2
M M X(5) XN2
H H X(6) X A
s s x(7) x o
MT(J) Mj X(8) X H
TT(I) T I X(9) Xco
HT(I,J) I_j X(10) XOH
ST(I,J) _j X(ll) XNO
X(12) X N
Input
The input is read into the IBM 7094 data processing system by the FORTRAN
statement
READ (5,100) RCH, REQ, TEMP, P
100 FORMAT (4E 16.8)
For example, an input car would be
Col.- 1 17
+0.00000000E+00 +0.10000000E+01
23 49
+0.50000000E+04 +0.10000000E+00
2O
APPENDIX
Output
The outputs for this program are the mole fractions of each constituent and the
thermodynamic properties of the gas mixture. For example, output for the input example
would be as follows:
RCH= 0.00000000E-38 REQ=- 0.10000000E+01 TEMP= 0.50000000E 04R P= 0. 100000000E 00ATM
XH20 XCO2 XO2 XH2
0.18315569E 00 0.00000000E-38 0.27084661E-01 0.71114589E-01
XN2 XA XO XH
0.57613321E 00 0.71005768E-02 0.25695777E-01 0.63610586E-01
XCO XOH XNO XN
0.00000000E-38 0.46109576E-01 0.00000000E-38 0.00000000E-38
M=0.21993865E 02 H= 0.14316146E 04BTU/LBM S=0.30918686E 01BTU/LBM-R
Built-In Data
The thermodynamic properties of the pure constituents (R_--J, -_) are taken from ref-
erences 3 and 4 and built in the program as two-dimensional arrays named HT(I,J) and
ST(I,J), where I is the index on temperature and J is the index on constituents. The
thermodynamic properties are built in for the discrete temperatures given in TT(I).
The enthalpy array HT(I,J) is interpolated linearly, whereas the entropy array ST(I,J)
is interpolated logarithmically.
Complete Program
The complete program including comments is reproduced in the following pages.
21
APPENDIX
tO t
D 0_
O oJ LL
× ;O _ _
D X _
© 0 X
I 0 _Z U _O X
_ u3
O X ed
>- P- _0
XtL _-
W X C_
C_ ed Ln _-W Z _
X •0
L) X F-
_ e') ZZ 0 _ 0
0 _ Z5r Od eq td
W ',9 XI t3
004I X
U ',9 U
0",@
>-I-
Ch
N
0
_Z
0",
Y
fl-Y
Y
LN
Y
_Zr
v
Od
vt
l-
t
_J
b_
IT
U
l-
ZhJDI-
I-uOZ0U
LU8"DO_
LL0
cOW
I--
WQ©O(O.
U
Z>-00
L_Z
kD U
oo0o,1 _ LP
_to 0 cq0 I"- I
,D O_ -
o o r-
gO \ 0
,_ 0 0 ed,_,,"• - \ 0 ..1"
0 ,,1" -- • _ I• _ 0 C)
- 0 0 tO t_.u _) 0 I -_
0 0 o P'- ":J
• • . Cq04 0 C" 0 ,"'J "-.¢e] if] _0 o P- I
cO _3 _P,o ; , d• 0 0 \
if/ _ I
• - "D PC_ CD 0
Od 0 ',4..3 -- _ I
• fb _ •
II - II _! _ _
©
• F- 0 I-- 09
\
oJ
e_
c,
_O
0
22
APPENDIX
60
0
I
0
0
I
r'i,13
-..1"
I
0
P_
]"
gOdp-
_D
COGO
Co
P
d' ("_tRJ
LP _P'+ nJ
C) gh
If] ,qt_t@
\
o
I_)
C_oj
I
6'4p-
roI
0
I
p-
_ "
O _0 O
O,
N
_0 P4 ©\ If) _(1
P'- 06,1 _
: 2 ;O O
t_ ',D 0'D tfl 0
It + 0_"
-2 _ J.¢ o I
F- _ ffl
1: o
< -_ Od
23
APPENDIX
\',0
_0
OJ
_r
qt_J
%_,0
0
_3
-.T
0_
2r-
4Cq
Cqftj
2
CHD
fl
t+ L_ k)
i1
13_
t_'I-
ff
t_
ff
O
[[J
¢;
t_G
c
C't f"
2_
F-
_EIX0t,k
(,(:
I
Ill
UJIi
0.
tUH-IinX<2
O13. hJ
"I:
kJ ×
d m
T _U U
t.)
O IO ",im X
; °I.-
©
N L
Om
I-<[
I
[U
13.I
X_r
04
II
-)
O
[3
24
APPEND]:X
oII
X
c_
(j-jI-
Z
ZO
U
J
UJ<3
0
tO
t) U ID
O4
rq -- f-
I"3 _ _J_- 0 _-
oII II
II (_J
U
U+ ff
_ g+-r" _
Uff \
o SW Wn, ff
II II
C'I (D
0
0t9
0
cOod
+
n
o
o0
._1
g0
i
13_
t.U
b_
Od _
0 0
0 00 0
W 0
S _ff IX
U
Ji
©
Uaf
[U
O
u9
<O
L9
Z
UO
u9u_
OIZO
Z
U t)
C_
4+
\
[:3
0a
II
4+
_3
\
gII
+ •
e +\ • ,,I"
I"4
I C_
• o4 r_
•_- 1:3 n
_ 4 gI1 II II
In tn "0
x x x
0
0
00
U
W
0WIT
/Wr_0
0
0Z
I-
U0u3u3
0!
Z0Z
25
APPENDIX
©
0I--
0
(,F) ._0
U
oj+ 0 Od
* + od \ 0
* * _ * hJ w. • \ • 0 • ©
OJ o_ oJ c_ iF" I --0
II II II I1 C _" LLJ
.... 0 b_ LLX X X X t3 _
Oj m
U
o.JIf'3
+-:t
v ,+ •
0 _ q_ _ I t
!
bJ - 0 _ _ ¢J <l
e
rD _ + r_ _ I
.d I I G * -- *
L9 I"- eq + . -._ *P C_ OJ I
Z • • ,k -I" C_
U7 ..... 'Zk/_ II li II I1 II O_
Cl v _" < _ (D XI
Z0;7
U
rh
gv XX
r9 \
•_ °I_ _ _ X
+ _J +
c"q OJ X 0_+ X CO X
+ _ \ Cq
• O, X
_ OJ X •
GJ + + (M+ >_
II II II li
X X Y X
C,
X
tP
X
* ¢q
E ו @
_d VII II
X EL
26
APPENDIX
cO o
0Ld I--II
0
0_ ._Tt£ WX (1(kl
t--- .J<Z_>- I1
0 qLL
00
#
[2td
C_0
LL
g]
I
Z
0
U
10
I
0 en0 X
_0
W
O
_ L
Lfi (9
0LP
0t-
0©
U
0
bl
]ZU
. . "; 2tO In
O • F3 -- CO• _ _ • / 0 ,,J"O + • • tO e
+ rO _ • / :k
J 0 0 n _ 6a _
Cb _ _ _ / _ W X0 _ + "-. n + _-bE _ .1 _ _ _ \ 0
(7] * + [-3 • \ _
, \ ; 2 o-,I" IX_9 • _ + C] _ _ (3
Z _ r'1 • + ELI _ uq
-- 0J _4 C 0J _J -- O
0 If II II If II _ II
[] X X X X X M [iIZ
0Z
U U
0
L_
0I--
0t9
_F
_In
k-_J
n
LL
(-_
_D
I/J
F-
CK0
L
u]
O
]Z
X
O_ C
F-_ (2,
ffO OI._ _9
U
..J I::hLU OJD r--0 4
O i"1
Z WO _-
m t'-
D b-in CO
O mU _
t5 *
Z *
I-- e
U _O Y
m
27
APPENDIX
0 0 __ _ 0
I I I I I
W W W W W O
\ \ \ \ \• • • • • 0
0 _ _ _ 0
0 _
z=-zzd _* * * * * W Z* * * * * •
_ U
..... ff ff C,II II II II II _ -- II
,,0
0
I-
0L9
e5£3
I
CO
r" vco _ ,
_ + 04_ V
_ _ +ttl ! A
I--- • 121
o • -
. * ,_ 04
ntl II
II OJ
,_" 04 C"jM _ <C
[3I
OJ
0.
II0oJ<
I
13_
H
O
04m
28
APPENDIX
A
_9O
4I
i
I <t• O
y •
•,-t _v •
• m_ Y
a. 0_II II
_ m
I
II0
v
+
oJ v
0_ O4. v<Y *O [I
Cli II II
o o o
t.)
Z
O
I--
013.
0u
_1
U
tLITU
n,0h
Z0
l--
LdI--
U U
_1
>-
O04
fn +
, rn
<zl +, 04
g _m
S ,-+ _
_ J
_ g* +
O ('4* :e
O
0d* +
_ tn -0d+ ;• O +
_ I--- 04
_ O aJ
O • __1
* 2 >O *
7 ; 5II hi
n" >-
ii h_ ii
O
_3+
cUO OJ2 04
+e] OO _-
_3* O
; g* I--_ .J
_1 •
_3
+0404O0
>-
J
>-
O
+
+
8
1
_J
o
Tm
F-cro
u3
.J
N
4
f.
o__E+
+
+O4
J
>-
S3
J
O>- _-
+ _ OO _ O t9_- O O
O <[ +t9 + _ O
_ _ o
_ O O• 0_ < •
_J 04 0 •
© • +
[tJ _ p+r)f_ j o tu
t t gZ * I Z
0 _ _ 00 • -J 00 _ _ 0
0 _J >- "_ _ |
_ j.-
j -- _ _JN +
>- . _ h
_J 0
tL _ _ L
* J
0 >-
+
4 5_ N
< O+ 0,1
_1 +
)-, g0J q
_ _J
('4 _
+ :_
_ 4
0d O
< +
. _J
0,1 O
_J 0d
N P_
1 _1
B9
APPENDIX
3O
APPENDIX
M
F-
i1
J
>
Od
+
+
Cq
<
J
>-
A COJv O)- I--
+ _ OO O
O O(kl <r< ++ _ _
5,1 o tb
G) j_J O vv <1: L>- ,
, .j r;
, / O_ O
J >" 0
IN _ LI
[L <:1" _
OI--
0
ocCc!
2M
.U
N
@,,pq
Ot.--
0L'.;
gb_
_J
h
A
J
LI
7J
\
J
h.II
I
,.,q
_1
I.LI
/
'NII
+ +_1 J
r'q _1
mod
0I--
0ID
oq
oa co
X cO
L9 X _ P"
o _M X
* G:) J UJ / , _" ,
• >- O N _ 13- uII O tl W II II II
S _J @ X -- X X X X
Ch c9Od
mc_I
+
p-
X
,.,1-
Q.
r_
I
\
C)
X+
x
+
c_
M
+
X
C_
II
X
A
Ch
X *, --_
I_ cO
× X
II tl
oJ _I
X X
0
X+
X+
X+
m
X
4+
X+
X
,nJ
\ed
II
X
LO
X
H
X
31
APPENDIX
otO
0
0_3
rr
tDZ
F-
<[
U0
EU g U
II II
4+ +
v
Y
ii II II
+ Y •
• o * " TII tl II II II ItO _ r_j _ O 0J
C 0 0 0 0,./
II
I
y
12. r--
II II II0 _
ii II
_ o
[3
cq
II
ojO
[D
oj
II
o
32
APPENDIX
.H
NII
0_- Od
0tO X
o_O_
\
04
XI
X
I
A
X+
OJ-- X
+x c_ -* * 1"3
r'- _ M
X _, x _
II CLII II
X X X
O,
x+
X+
6":
X
t',j
,SII
,,0
X
i..qW
I-ffU3ff0ff0.
U
<Z>-C)©
q."Ld"]:k-
hiffDF-X
Z
<:[©
U0
Z0
t-
_tDu/
U
(,)
',lD
B
II
00
oIP
ul
O_
(D
o0
vI-HI
_EUJF-
h.
UJ
DZ
Z
0U
O_
A
"7
I-
F-\
v
0
I.- j
t 5"\ --
\
I-- W
I v
n O
W .J
_ v
ii iiT _J J r_W W n II II
T
B
II--)
00
0I--
0L_
-- -)-)
X× +
b_ Ir
I/UJ
-)
7
t-I
I
F-I
+
-'D
I
b-
X
+I
III
AA
X
0-
00I
Iu'1_JLU
-)
I
_qI
--)
l,-dl
+
--)
I
I-I./I
-)
X+
ii
WDZ
I-
ZCU
33
APPENDIX
\ "-,C_ cCc3 S3he _
S3 c0
FI M
X
I
X
04ZX
c_
e
11
-3
-3
X
©
Op-
U
D NI]
t--
O
1.5
_U-,,1"\ZXI
]: rnrn XX E_
• Z
,O X
kd _<t X\ c9
I -X Z
I Ocq X× Ic3 _
_ N
O×I k)r'3 XX I_ c'3,
O c_U× ,;
Xo4 \
• X0 Ied c_I Xx _.
XX
0
<5O
I
00...1"
,,g
LLI'-
N
I_Er9J\Db-LO]:
COo
LdIId_Ir_XO_
.J\
t-
b-
a3
ijjtl"EIodXrq
II
cklX0d
_2_XO
U_
Oo
\\
00tn
0F-
ED0 Z0 kJ
34
RE FERENCES
1, Hall, Eldon W.; and Weber, Richard J.: Tables and Charts for Thermodynamic Cal-
culations Involving Air and Fuels Containing Boron, Carbon, Hydrogen, and Oxygen.
NACA RM E56B27, 1956.
2o Clarke, J. F.; and McChesney, M.: The Dynamics of Real Gases. Butterworths, 1964.
3. Browne, W. G.; and Warlick, D. L.: Properties of Combustion Gases - System:
H2-Air. R62FPD-366, Advan. Engine Technol. Dep., Gem Elec. Co., Nov. 1962.
(Reprinted Sept. 1964.)
4. Anon.: Properties of Combustion Gases - System: CnH2n-Air.
Volume I - Thermodynamic Properties. AGT Develop. Dep., Gen. Elec. Co.,
c. 1955.
Volume II - Chemical Composition of Equilibrium Mixtures. McGraw-Hill
Book Co., Inc., c.1955.
5. Erickson, Wayne D.; Kemper, Jane T.; and Allison, Dennis O.: A Method for Com-
puting Chemical-Equilibrium Compositions of Reacting-Gas Mixtures by Reduction
to a Single Iteration Equation. NASA TN D-3488, 1966.
6. Zeleznik, Frank J.; and Gordon, Sanford: An Analytical Investigation of Three Gen-
eral Methods of Calculating Chemical-Equilibrium Compositions. NASA TN D-473,
1960.
7. Anon.: U.S. Standard Atmosphere, 1962. NASA, U.S. Air Force, and U.S. Weather
Bur., Dec. 1962.
8. McCracken, Daniel D.: A Guide to FORTRAN l>rograming. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
c. 1961.
35
0
0
d
z
_q0_q
0
o_
.o
_ 0
0 tt
0 +
0
oII II
0 0+ +
0rj
o_Z
d
Z_q0
0
o 0•,'_ II
_, II II 0
0r_
0rj
• d•r..I t2_
2:
0
+
_ 0 _._ r..)._ A
II _._
_ o ur..)+
0
0
0
00
II _,1
_ 0o r..)
!
_ _xl V
r_ vgl
Z o
0
0
0°_,,.i
._...
E
g_
_UT:FeToosgT(I _-_ _ui_TaOSSTpuo N
a.m:l_,_adtuej.
36
I00 -
om
o.J
8O
60
4O
2O
0
-2O
=Nz
2H+O=H20
O+N-- NO
i+CO = C0220 "-- 02
H H2= OH
r---H2+ CO 2 = CO + H20
3H2 +N2 = 2NH3
C02+ C(S) = 2C0
I I I I I.0002 .0004 .0006 .0008 .001
I / T, I/°R
I 1 I I
7' 000:3000 2000 I000
Temperoture, °R
I I I I3000 2000 I000 600
Temperoture, °K
Figure 2.- Variationof equilibrium constantswith temperaturefor gasmodelreactions.
3q
6:1062500
5
2000
4
1500
0 0
- 500
-I000
- 15001.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8
Entropy, S, Btu/Ibm-°RL i I _ i 16 7 8 9 I0 II
Entropy,S, J/kg-OK
3.0
t12
5.2
13XlO 3
Figure 3.- Mollier diagramfor kerosene-aircombustionproducts(rch = 0.51. req = 1.0.
38
o0o0
"oX0
]ii]
!ii:
]]ii
!iil
ihl
iil
,il,
!!ii
000CO
]ilii!i iili!!
I i:
N
: I
..... N L;;
il i:\
........ N. 2:
i _]i!i
?
:::::
.)!ii _ ..
.... I
I I: t f_:
TI:::ti
......... I I
toOo
iiii iiiiiiii i
Lii iiiii!il iiii_iii
i i_i_ ii iiiiiiii
_iL _ _.! iiiiiiii
i_ ...ikL! .... iil
_:_: _' :7: i!i
_ iiii ilh • H:
I'N iiii
i! ii#
x il}}X_?:
_ \2ii r.....
-., :
]i
if,! _ ii;: [i;a, _ ....i- = _ ili:ili,
_ 0 !iii!
- i!i iiri
ii i;i ii_iiiii
] i]] i]]
] ]] ill il]i7- ::: ::r ::::
ii !i[ !]il
i;;2[[;[ _i;;;;;;:: :::: :: ::
i ii[__iii iiiiiih
i i_i ii]! _i
i iiiiiill _ii_i_;:: :::
i!::i:i_ !!};;i
:ii,i .... , ;iil;ii:!ili :ii [[[i Fii
OoO
wqlln#l] IH '_dlO41U3
0I 6
5_l/r 'H'/,dloq._u3
o%X0
io0
q,<1-
(.o
Ic_
o_
II
I
jo_
o 1
O0
tO
_D
e,lI
I
I
II
#
iL
#
y
u
o
39
%
oo
O
X I I I0 0 0 0
_ -- 0
0 IJ,' apnl!llV
0 o 0ID o ID
,,a'- iv)
LU ' apnl!llV
I I
0 0
[00
_0d
_0
-(Z)
-I_
-ID
-ur')
I0IDOd
E
,.--U E
0
o
¥E
C.
iM
giT.
40
HI
0¢.-
CILl
Hs
Ref. 3
m--Simplified
Vj = _/2Jg (Ht-Hs)
mode I
PI=IO otm
P "P0o
Entropy
Figure 6.- Isentropic nozzle expansion process.
41
m
0
E
"I0G>
® E_-_
//
/
L ) ....... _ ...... J _
o ooo0as ' dSl
_ ___L ......... ]
o ooo
O,J
m
o
!,.-
_0
I.-
CP
E
t-
O
:E
E
Z
oo
E
II <c
c
nm ,-
c _
Q H
E
,,.n.,
J,-.2
.__
42
E0
d
c
EJ
100.0
I0.0
.0
.Ol
Equivalence ratio, req
Figure 8.- Limiting pressure for solid carbon formation for methane-air combustion products (rch : 0.25). req,lim : 4.0.
43
Figure g.- Limiting pressure for solid carbon formation for kerosene-air combustion products (rch = 0.5). req, lim = 3.0.
44
E
,m
(3.
i/)¢/)
C
.B
EJ
I00.0
I0.0
1.0
.I
.01
TemperatureoR 2400• K 1333
I 2 3
Equivalence ratio, req
Figure 10.- Limiting pressurefor solid carbonformationfor benzene-aircombustionproducts(rch = ]..01).req,lirn = 2.5.
45
I00.0
I0.0
.01
Equivalence rotio, req
Figure ].].- Limiting pressure for ammonia formation (XNH 3 = 0.01)for hydrogen-air combustion products (rch = 0t.