a september 8, 2016 - bay bridge...

CALTRANS BAY AREA TOLL AUTHORITY CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

ASeptember 8, 2016

Letter of Transmittal

TO: Toll Bridge Program Oversight Committee (TBPOC)

DATE: September 1, 2016

FR: Program Management Team (PMT)

RE: TBPOC Meeting Materials Packet – September 8, 2016

Herewith is the TBPOC Meeting Materials Packet for the September 8th meeting. The packet

includes memoranda and reports that will be presented at the meeting. A Table of Contents

is provided following the Agenda to help locate specific topics.

Table of Contents

TBPOC MEETING September 8, 2016

INDEX TAB AGENDA

ITEM DESCRIPTION

N/A 1 Roll Call

N/A 2 Chair’s Report

3 3 Consent Calendar a. TBPOC June 15, 2016 Meeting Minutes

4 4

2016 Second Quarter Project Progress and Financial Update

5 5 Yerba Buena Island Transition Span 2 Contract

a. Deletion of Contract Scope Related to Southgate Road – Summary of Cost Savings

b. Updated Cost Analyses to Complete and Contract Funds Request

6 6 Old East Span Demolition - CMGC Contract Permits Update

7 7 SAS Tower Anchor Rod Grouting Contract Update

8 8 Program Budget/Risks Update for FY 16-17

(Capital Outlay/Capital Outlay Support/Risk Management)

9 9 TBPOC Operation Procedures Under Bagley Keene

10 10 Public Comment / Other Business

Toll Bridge Program Oversight Committee (TBPOC) Meeting 1:00 PM – 4:00 PM, September 8, 2016

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Bay Area Metro Center

375 Beale Street, San Francisco, CA 94105 1st Floor Board Room

Item Number/ Topic

Presenter Time Desired

Outcome

1. Roll Call Malcolm Dougherty Information

2. Chair’s Report Malcolm Dougherty 5 min Information

3. Consent Calendar a. TBPOC June 15, 2016 Meeting Minutes

Andrew Fremier, BATA 1 min Approval

4. 2016 Second Quarter Project Progress and Financial Update

Peter Lee, BATA 5 min Approval

5. Yerba Buena Island Transition Span 2 Contract a. Deletion of Contract Scope Related to

Southgate Road – Summary of Cost Savings

Steven Whipple, Caltrans/ Deanna Vilcheck, Caltrans

10 min Information

b. Updated Cost Analyses to Complete and Contract Funds Request

Steven Whipple, Caltrans/ Deanna Vilcheck, Caltrans

10 min Approval

6. Old East Span Demolition - CMGC Contract Permits Update

Brian Maroney, Caltrans/ Stefan Galvez, Caltrans

10 min Information

7. SAS Tower Anchor Rod Grouting Contract Update Dan McElhinney, Caltrans 5 min Information

8. Program Budget/Risks Update for FY 16-17 (Capital Outlay/Capital Outlay Support/Risk Management)

Dan McElhinney, Caltrans/ Doanh Ngyuen, Caltrans/ Patrick Treacy, Caltrans

10 min Approval

9. TBPOC Operation Procedures Under Bagley Keene Dan McElhinney, CT 10 min Approval

10. Public Comment / Other Business

11. Adjournment / Next Meeting The next meeting of the TBPOC will be held on November 10, 2016 at 1:00 p.m.-4:00p.m., 1121 N Street, Sacramento, CA (Caltrans Board Room)

Final Agenda

Accessibility and Title VI: TBPOC provides services/accommodations upon request to persons with disabilities and individuals who are limited-English proficient who wish to address Committee matters. For accommodations or translations assistance, please call the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) at 510.817.5757 or 510.817.5769 for TDD/TTY. We require three working days' notice to accommodate your request.

Acceso y el Titulo VI: El TBPOC puede proveer asistencia/facilitar la comunicacion a las personas discapacitadas y los individuos con conocimiento limitado del ingles quienes quieran dirigirse a la Comité. Para solicitar asistencia, por favor llame a la Comisiớn Metropolitano de Transporte (MTC) al numero 510.817.5757 o al 510.817.5769 para TDD/TTY. Requerimos que solicite asistencia con tres dias habiles de anticipacion para poderle proveer asistencia. Meeting Information and Conduct: Effective, January 1, 2016, the TBPOC is governed by the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act which requires the TBPOC to publish an agenda at least ten days in advance of any meeting. A copy of this meeting notice and agenda will be posted 10 days prior to the meeting and related book items will be posted 3 days prior to the meeting and on the TBPOC Website: www.baybridgeinfo.org Questions or inquiries about this meeting may be directed to TBPOC staff (Karen Wang, 510-208-4599, 1111 Broadway, Suite 900, Oakland, CA). Furthermore, in the event that any public meeting conducted by TBPOC is willfully interrupted or disrupted by a person or by a group or groups of persons so as to render the orderly conduct of the meeting unfeasible, the Chair may order the removal of those individuals who are willfully disrupting the meeting. Such individuals may be subject to arrest. If order cannot be restored by such removal, the members of the committee may direct that the meeting room be cleared (except for representatives of the press or other news media not participating in the disturbance), and the session may continue on matters appearing on the agenda.

Memorandum

TO: Toll Bridge Program Oversight Committee (TBPOC) DATE: September 1, 2016

FR: Andrew Fremier, Deputy Executive Director, Operations, MTC/BATA

RE: Agenda No. - 3a

Item- TBPOC June 15, 2016 Meeting Minutes

Recommendation: Approval Cost: NA Schedule: NA Discussion: The Program Management Team has reviewed and requests TBPOC approval of the June 15, 2016 Meeting Minutes.

1 of 1 Item 3a_Memo-15Jun16Min_08Sep16-final.doc

TBPOC REGULAR MEETING MINUTES

June 15, 2016, 4:00 pm – 5:00 pm 1120 N Street, Sacramento, CA (Caltrans Board Room)

Teleconference Locations:

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Office Building 375 Beale Street, Suite 800, San Francisco, CA (Alcatraz Conference Room)

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Office Building

3331 N. 1st St, San Jose, CA (Conference Room – C119)

Attendees: TBPOC Members: Malcolm Dougherty (Chair), Susan Bransen, Steve Heminger (present via phone)

PMT Members: Dan McElhinney, Stephen Maller Participants: Brian Maroney, Deanna Vilcheck, Bob Finney, Karen Wang

Convened: 4:02 pm Items Action

1. Roll Call • Caltrans and CTC TBPOC members were

present at the meeting location. BATA TBPOC member participated by phone from the MTC teleconference location. The Chair confirmed a quorum.

2. Chair’s Report • Item 5 (Request for Initial Legal Support

Budget Related to the SAS Contract Arbitration) was withdrawn from the agenda

• The new eastbound YBI onramp to the I-80 East Span Bay Bridge opened on June 2nd providing significant access improvement and safety with its longer ramp length.

• On the old bay bridge demolition, great progress continues removing the third of five 504' truss on May 24th as it was safely and responsibly brought down for recycling - and the next 504' truss is expected to be brought down early in July.

• Good progress is being made on the environmental permitting for the removal of the old east spans marine foundations (E4 through E18) using the innovative

1 of 4

TBPOC_061516MtgMin-final.docx

(Continued)

Items Action underwater small charge implosion technique through the CMGC contract.

3. Consent Calendar a. TBPOC May 12, 2016 Meeting Minutes

The TBPOC approved the Consent Calendar item. Motion by: Susan Bransen Second by: Steve Heminger Votes (3-0): Yes- Steve Heminger, Susan Bransen, Malcolm Dougherty; No-0

4. Yerba Buena Island Transition Span 2 Contract Change Orders (CCO) – Deferred Items from May 12, 2016 TBPOC Meeting a. CCO 52-S1 and 75-S1: Bike Path Railing

Fabrication & Installation Costs • Dan McElhinney, Caltrans District 4 Chief

Deputy District Director, presented the recommendation for TBPOC approval of CCOs 52-S1 and 75-S1, with funding not to exceed $2,200,000 and $1,800,000 respectively, for modifications to the YBITS structure and eastbound on ramp hand railings. This request can be funded from the current contingency balances and is within the risk forecast for each contract.

• Deanna Vilcheck, Caltrans SFOBB Area Construction Manager, presented a slide presentation providing background to the related agenda item.

• Susan Bransen requested clarification on the breakdown between fabrication and installation cost. Deanna responded that out of the total recommended fund request for Item 4a (handrail), 2/3 of the total cost is related to the fabrication and 1/3 is related to installation costs.

• Steve Heminger stated this item was deferred at the March meeting as it was not clear if any of the costs were the responsibility of the contractor. Steve Heminger noted the current staff report does not address the question of contractor responsibility.

• Bob Finney, Deputy District Director of Caltrans District 4 Construction, provided background on increased costs due to owner-directed CCO work to fabricate steel cantilever beams as per the TBPOC approved architectural change for the 3 beam portion of the SFOBB bike path segment that connects near the SAS west

The TBPOC approved CCOs 52-S1 and 75-S1, with funding not to exceed $2,200,000 and $1,800,000 respectively, for modifications to the YBITS structure and eastbound on-ramp hand railings. Motion by: Susan Bransen Second by: Steve Heminger Votes (3-0): Yes- Steve Heminger, Susan Bransen, Malcolm Dougherty; No-0

2 of 4


(Continued)

Items Action end cable area leading to the YBITS structures.

• In brief, Bob summarized that the question of whether the fabricator and contractor will cover cost increases due to beam fabrication issues will depend on the final outcome of the work, the resident engineer final evaluation, and if the contractor presents any claims on the issue.

• He added that the fabrication of the beams was performed as force account work (i.e time and materials) under the change in character clause of the contract because the contractor would not sign an agreed price CCO for fabrication and placement of the beams or placement of bike path tubs on the new beams. To keep moving ahead, the original cost estimate was a simple estimate for a nominal amount of steel procurement and fabrication that did not contemplate a protracted timeline to develop and implement a repair procedure for the beams once distortion was noted. In the case of these beams a mockup was created and later used as a permanent beam and there was no distortion noted at that time (before fabricating the next 2 beams). Typically, unless there is negligence or costs directly attributed to contractor actions or inactions force account methods of payment cover all costs. So far the resident engineer had not seen any cost that that should not be compensated but staff were still reviewing bills for inaccuracies.

b. CCO 76-S1: Bike Path Cantilever at Bent W2

• Dan McElhinney presented the recommendation for TBPOC approval of CCO 76-S1 with funding not to exceed $2.5 million for architectural changes to the bike path cantilever beams at Bent W2. This request can be funded from the current contract contingency balance and is within the risk forecast.

• In response to the question on breakdown of costs, Deanna mentioned that for Item 4b (bike path cantilever beam) about $1.5M is related to fabrication cost and about $1M for installation.

The TBPOC approved CCO 76-S1 with funding not to exceed $2.5 million for architectural changes to the bike path cantilever beams at Bent W2. Motion by: Susan Bransen Second by: Steve Heminger Votes (3-0): Yes- Susan Bransen, Steve Heminger, Malcolm Dougherty; No-0

3 of 4


(Continued)

Items Action 5. Request for Initial Legal Support Budget

Related to the SAS Contract Arbitration Item withdrawn from the agenda.

6. Public Comment / Other Business • No public comment.

Next TBPOC meeting is scheduled on September 8, 2016.

Adjourned: 4:29 pm

TBPOC REGULAR MEETING MINUTES June 15, 2016, 4:00pm – 5:00pm

APPROVED BY: _________________________________________ ______________ MALCOLM DOUGHERTY, TBPOC Chair Date Director, California Department of Transportation _________________________________________ ______________ SUSAN BRANSEN Date Executive Director, California Transportation Commission _________________________________________ ______________ STEVE HEMINGER, Date Executive Director, Bay Area Toll Authority

4 of 4


Memorandum



FR: Peter Lee, Principal, BATA

RE: Agenda No. - 4

Item- 2016 Second Quarter Project Progress and Financial Update

Recommendation: Approval Cost: N/A Schedule Impacts: N/A Discussion: Staff will present the draft 2016 Second Quarter Project Progress and Financial Update Report at the September 8th 2016 TBPOC meeting for approval. Attachment: 2016 Second Quarter Project Progress and Financial Update

1 of 1 Item 4_2016_2ndQtrRept_08Sep16-final.doc

Released: February 2016 ○

DRAFT VERSION4.1

San Francisco Bay AreaToll Bridge Seismic Retrofit andRegional Measure 1 Programs

San Francisco Bay AreaToll Bridge Seismic Retrofit andRegional Measure 1 Programs

Released: August 2016

2016 Second QuarterProject Progress

and Financial Update

Toll Bridge Program Oversight Committee Department of Transportation

Office of the Director 1120 N Street

P.O. Box 942873 Sacramento, CA 94273-0001

September 8, 2016 Mr. Daniel Alvarez Secretary of the Senate State Capitol, Room 3044 Sacramento, CA 95814 Mr. E. Dotson Wilson Chief Clerk of the Assembly State Capitol, Room 3196 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Messrs. Alvarez and Wilson: The Toll Bridge Program Oversight Committee (TBPOC) is pleased to submit the 2016 Second Quarter Project Progress and Financial Update, for the San Francisco Bay Area Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit and Regional Measure 1 Programs (TBSRP and RM1), prepared pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Section 30952. The TBPOC was established by Assembly Bill 144 in 2005 to oversee the delivery of the TBSRP and consists of the Executive Director of the Bay Area Toll Authority (BATA), the Director of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and the Executive Director of the California Transportation Commission (CTC). With the opening of the new east span of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge to traffic on September 2, 2013, all seven state-owned toll bridges in the Bay Area have now achieved seismic safety, either via retrofit, or replacement of existing structures. Caltrans is proceeding on a number of contracts to remove the old east span of the SFOBB and complete remaining work on Yerba Buena Island (YBI). The YBI #2 contractor has removed the main cantilever and YBI detour structures and is now in the process of completing the pedestrian/bicycle pathway and site work on the island. A new eastbound on-ramp from the island was opened on June 2, 2016. The pedestrian/bicycle pathway will open to YBI by this fall. The superstructure dismantling contractor has removed the last of five 504' superstructure trusses in August of 2016. With the successful implosion of the old Pier E3 footing with minimal environmental impact, Caltrans is now in the process of seeking final environmental approvals for removal of the remaining marine foundation piers by the implosion process. Additional implosions are scheduled during environmental windows for later this year and in the next two years. Each contract has a contingency allowance within its budget. The sum of these contingency allowances is compared to the total of capital outlay, capital outlay support and program-wide risks. Any excess of the risks over the contingency allowances represents a potential draw on the program contingency. The program contingency is currently $67.7 million in accordance with the TBPOC approved budget. As of the end of the second quarter of 2016, the 50 percent probable draw on

program contingency is $184 million. The potential draw ranges from about $100 million to $270 million. The program contingency is currently insufficient to cover the cost of identified risks and it is likely that BATA will need to allocate additional toll funds from its reserves to pay for the remainder of the work.

The TBPOC is committed to providing the Legislature and the CTC with comprehensive and timely reporting on the TBSRP. If there are any questions, or if any additional information is required, please do not hesitate to contact the members of the TBPOC. Sincerely,

MALCOLM DOUGHERTY STEVE HEMINGER SUSAN BRANSEN TBPOC Chair Executive Director Executive Director Director Bay Area Toll Authority California Transportation Commission California Department of Transportation

Toll Bridge Program Oversight Committee Department of Transportation

Office of the Director 1120 N Street

P.O. Box 942873 Sacramento, CA 94273-0001

September 8, 2016 Mr. Bob Alvarado, Chair California Transportation Commission 1120 N Street, Room 2221 Sacramento, CA 95814 Ms. Fran Inman, Vice-Chair California Transportation Commission 1120 N Street, Room 2221 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Mr. Alvarado and Ms. Inman: The Toll Bridge Program Oversight Committee (TBPOC) is pleased to submit the 2016 Second Quarter Project Progress and Financial Update, for the San Francisco Bay Area Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit and Regional Measure 1 Programs (TBSRP and RM1), prepared pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Section 30952. The TBPOC was established by Assembly Bill 144 in 2005 to oversee the delivery of the TBSRP and consists of the Executive Director of the Bay Area Toll Authority (BATA), the Director of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and the Executive Director of the California Transportation Commission (CTC). With the opening of the new east span of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge to traffic on September 2, 2013, all seven state-owned toll bridges in the Bay Area have now achieved seismic safety, either via retrofit, or replacement of existing structures. Caltrans is proceeding on a number of contracts to remove the old east span of the SFOBB and complete remaining work on Yerba Buena Island (YBI). The YBI #2 contractor has removed the main cantilever and YBI detour structures and is now in the process of completing the pedestrian/bicycle pathway and site work on the island. A new eastbound on-ramp from the island was opened on June 2, 2016. The pedestrian/bicycle pathway will open to YBI by this fall. The superstructure dismantling contractor has removed the last of five 504' superstructure trusses in August of 2016. With the successful implosion of the old Pier E3 footing with minimal environmental impact, Caltrans is now in the process of seeking final environmental approvals for removal of the remaining marine foundation piers by the implosion process. Additional implosions are scheduled during environmental windows for later this year and in the next two years. Each contract has a contingency allowance within its budget. The sum of these contingency allowances is compared to the total of capital outlay, capital outlay support and program-wide risks. Any excess of the risks over the contingency allowances represents a potential draw on the program contingency. The program contingency is currently $67.7 million in accordance with the TBPOC approved budget. As of the end of the second quarter of 2016, the 50 percent probable draw on

program contingency is $184 million. The potential draw ranges from about $100 million to $270 million. The program contingency is currently insufficient to cover the cost of identified risks and it is likely that BATA will need to allocate additional toll funds from its reserves to pay for the remainder of the work.

The TBPOC is committed to providing the Legislature and the CTC with comprehensive and timely reporting on the TBSRP. If there are any questions, or if any additional information is required, please do not hesitate to contact the members of the TBPOC. Sincerely,

MALCOLM DOUGHERTY STEVE HEMINGER SUSAN BRANSEN TBPOC Chair Executive Director Executive Director Director Bay Area Toll Authority California Transportation Commission California Department of Transportation

w

The Program Management Team (PMT):

Andrew FremierBay Area Toll AuthorityMetropolitan Transportation Commission

Stephen MallerCalifornia Transportation Commission

Dan McElhinneyCaltrans District 4 - Bay Area

Caltrans, SFOBB Chief Engineer: Brian Maroney

Table of Contents

Introduction 1

Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program Cost Summary 2

Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program Schedule Summary 3

San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge Seismic Retrofit Strategy 4

Yerba Buena Island Transition Structures #2 5

504’/288’ Structures Dismantling 6

Marine Foundations 7

Self-Anchored Suspension Bridge Superstructure 8

TBSRP Risk Management Program Update 9

Program Funding Status 12

Quarterly Environmental Compliance Highlights 14

Appendices 15

Photo Credits: Sam BurbankCover photos, inside cover photos, table of contents photo and photos on all pages containing photos.

x

Toll Bridge Program Oversight Committee

Map of Bay Area Toll Bridges

* The Golden Gate Bridge is owned and operated by the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District.

1


Introduction

Introduction

Introduction

Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Projects Seismic Safety StatusDumbarton Bridge Seismic Retrofit CompleteAntioch Bridge Seismic Retrofit CompleteSan Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge East Span Replacement Complete*San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge West Approach Replacement Complete

San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge West Span Seismic Retrofit CompleteSan Mateo-Hayward Bridge Seismic Retrofit CompleteRichmond-San Rafael Bridge Seismic Retrofit Complete1958 Carquinez Bridge Seismic Retrofit Complete1962 Benicia-Martinez Bridge Seismic Retrofit CompleteSan Diego-Coronado Bridge Seismic Retrofit CompleteVincent Thomas Bridge Seismic Retrofit Complete

In July 2005, Assembly Bill (AB) 144 (Hancock) created the Toll Bridge Program Oversight Committee (TBPOC) to implement a project oversight and project control process for the new Benicia-Martinez Bridge and State Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program (TBSRP) projects. The TBPOC consists of the Director of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the Executive Director of the Bay Area Toll Authority (BATA) and the Executive Director of the California Transportation Commission (CTC). The TBPOC’s project oversight and control processes include, but are not limited to, reviewing bid specifications and documents, reviewing and approving significant change orders and claims in excess of $1 million (as defined by the TBPOC), and keeping the Legislature and others apprised of current project progress and status. In January 2010, Assembly Bill (AB) 1175 (Torlakson) amended the TBSRP to include the Antioch and Dumbarton Bridges seismic retrofit projects. The current TBSRP is as follows:

* The seismic safety opening of the bridge occurred in September 2013. The remaining work to do on the project is the completion of the on-ramps and bicycle/pedestrian path and the removal of the old bridge structure.

2


Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program Cost Summary

Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program Cost Summary (Millions)Contract Status

AB 144/SB 66/

AB 1175 Budget

TBPOCApproved Changes

Current TBPOC

Approved Budget

(May 2016)

Cost to Date (May 2016)

Current Cost Forecast

(May 2016)

Cost Variance

Cost Status

a b c = a + b d e f = e - c

SFOBB East Span Seismic ReplacementCapital Outlay Construction

Skyway Completed 1,293.0 (55.8) 1,237.2 1,235.6 1,235.7 (1.5) ●SAS Marine Foundations Completed 313.5 (38.7) 274.8 274.8 274.8 - ●SAS Superstructure Completed 1,753.7 293.1 2,046.8 1,972.5 2,049.0 2.2 ●YBI Detour Completed 131.9 341.4 473.3 473.3 473.3 - ●YBI Transition Structures (YBITS) 299.3 0.1 299.4 264.4 326.5 27.1

YBITS 1 Completed 203.7 206.9 204.9 1.2 ●YBITS 2 Cantilever Dismantling Construction 92.4 57.5 118.3 25.9 ●YBITS Landscaping Design 3.3 - 3.3 - ●

Oakland Touchdown (OTD) 283.8 46.8 330.6 322.1 329.7 (0.9) ●OTD 1 Completed 205.3 202.8 205.3 - ●OTD 2 Completed 72.6 71.2 71.9 (0.7) ●Detour Completed 47.0 42.3 46.8 (0.2) ●OTD Electrical Systems Design - - - -

Submerged Electric Cable Completed 5.7 5.7 5.7 - ●Existing Bridge Dismantling 239.2 80.9 320.1 128.2 408.6 88.5 ●

Cantilever Section Construction 69.0 68.5 69.0 ●504’/288’ Sections Construction 103.5 42.4 102.3 ●Marine Foundations Construction 147.5 17.4 237.3

Pier E3 Demonstration Project 17.5 16.7 17.5 ● Remaining Marine Foundations 130.0 0.7 219.8 ●

Stormwater Treatment Measures Completed 15.0 3.3 18.3 16.9 17.0 (1.3) ●Other Completed Contracts Completed 90.4 (0.5) 89.9 90.0 90.5 0.6 ●

Capital Outlay Support 959.3 352.2 1,311.5 1,297.2 1,394.2 82.7 ●Right-of-Way and Environmental Mitigation 72.4 - 72.4 60.2 70.0 (2.4) ●Other Budgeted Capital 35.1 (32.8) 2.3 0.7 2.3 (0.0) ●Total SFOBB East Span Replacement 5,486.6 989.9 6,476.5 6,135.7 6,671.7 195.2

Antioch Bridge Seismic Retrofit

Capital Outlay Construction and Mitigation Completed - 24.1 24.1 24.1 23.8 (0.3) ●Capital Outlay Support - 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 - ●Total Antioch Bridge Seismic Retrofit 267.0 71.1 71.1 71.1 70.8 (0.3) ●

Dumbarton Bridge Seismic Retrofit

Capital Outlay Construction and Mitigation Completed - 46.0 46.0 47.4 45.4 (0.6) ●Capital Outlay Support - 66.4 66.4 64.6 66.4 - ●Total Dumbarton Bridge Seismic Retrofit 483.0 112.4 112.4 112.0 111.8 (0.6) ●

Program Completed Projects Completed 2,268.4 (74.1) 2,194.3 2,168.9 2,174.4 (19.9)

Miscellaneous Program Costs 30.0 - 30.0 25.5 30.0 - ●Net Programmatic Risks - - - - 9.8 9.8 ●Program Contingency* 900.0 (832.3) 67.7 - - (67.7) ●Total Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program * 9,435.0 (483.0) 8,952.0 8,513.4 9,068.5 116.5 ●

* AB144/SB66 established a funding level of $8.685 Billion in July 2005 for TBSRP, AB1175 added the retrofitting of the Antioch and Dumbarton Bridges in January 2010, providing another $750 million in funding, bringing Total Toll Seismic Retrofit Program funding to $9.435 Billion. Since 2010, $483 million has been removed from the program, bringing the current TBPOC Approved Budget to $8.952 Billion. The $483 million removed consisted of: Antioch Savings (4/12/10) $137 million - Dumbarton Savings (9/02/10) $216 million - Program Contingency Redirection (11/05/13) $130 million, the current TBPOC approved Program Budget is $8,952 million. ** (Due to the rounding of numbers, the totals above are show within $0.02).

3


Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program Schedule Summary

Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program Schedule Summary

AB 144/SB 66 Project

Completion Schedule Baseline

(July 2005)

TBPOC Approved Changes (Months)

Current TBPOC Approved

Completion Schedule

(June 2016)

Current Completion

Forecast(June 2016)

Schedule Variance (Months)

g h i = g + h j k = j - i l

SFOBB East Span Seismic Replacement

Contract Completion

Skyway Apr 2007 8 Dec 2007 Dec 2007 - ●SAS Marine Foundations Jun 2008 (5) Jan 2008 Jan 2008 - ●SAS Superstructure Mar 2012 42 Sep 2015 Sep 2015 - ●YBI Detour Jul 2007 39 Oct 2010 Oct 2010 - ●YBI Transition Structures (YBITS) Nov 2013 36 -

YBITS 1 Feb 2014 Feb 2014 - ●YBITS 2 Jun 2017 Oct 2017 (4) ●

Oakland Touchdown Nov 2013 10

OTD 1 Jun 2010 Jun 2010 - ●OTD 2 Sep 2015 Sep 2015 - ●Submerged Electric Cable Jan 2008 Jan 2008 - ●

Existing Bridge Dismantling Sep 2014 51 Dec 2018 Dec 2018 - ●Cantilever Section (2) Jul 2015 ●504/288 Sections Mar 2018 Mar 2018 ●Marine Foundations

E3 Foundation Removal Demo Project Jan 2016 Jan 2016 ●

E4 - E18 Foundation Removal Dec 2018 Dec 2018 ●Stormwater Treatment Measures Mar 2008 Mar 2008 - ●

SFOBB East Span Bridge Opening and Other Milestones

Westbound Seismic Safety Open Sep 2011 24 Sep 2013 Sep 2013 - ●Eastbound Seismic Safety Open Sep 2012 12 Sep 2013 Sep 2013 - ● Bike/Ped Path to Landing Dec 2015 Sep 2016 (9) ●Eastbound On-Ramp Dec 2015 Jun 2016 (6) ●

Within approved schedule and budgetIdentified potential project risks that could significantly impact approved schedules and budgets if not mitigatedKnown project impacts with forthcoming changes to approved schedules and budgets

West Approach West Span4

Toll Bridge Program Oversight CommitteeToll Bridge Program Oversight Committee

TOLL BRIDGE SEISMIC RETROFIT PROGRAMSan Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge East Span Seismic Retrofit Strategy

San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge Seismic Retrofit Strategy

Rather than a seismic retrofit, the two-mile long east span of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge has been completely rebuilt. The new east span consists of several different sections, yet appears as a single streamlined span. The eastbound and westbound lanes of the east span no longer include upper and lower decks. The lanes are side-by-side, providing motorists with expansive views of the bay. These views are also enjoyed by bicyclists and pedestrians, thanks to a new bicycle/pedestrian path on the south side of the bridge that will extend all the way to Yerba Buena Island. The new span features the world’s longest Self-Anchored Suspension (SAS) bridge that connects to an elegant roadway supported by piers (Skyway), which gradually slopes down toward the Oakland shoreline (Oakland Touchdown).

The new bridge is now open to traffic and seismically safe. Ongoing work includes the ramps from Yerba Buena Island and removal of the old bridge.

New East Span Consists of Several Different Sections - Appears as a Single Streamlined Span

Self-Anchored Suspension Bridge Superstructure

Yerba Buena Island Transition SAS Skyway Oakland Touchdown 5


East Span Seismic Replacement Project

YBITS #2 - Eastbound On-Ramp and Cantilever Dismantling ContractApproved Capital Outlay Budget: $92.4 M & $69.0 MContractor: CEC & Silverado, JVStatus: 80% Complete as of June 2016

TOLL BRIDGE SEISMIC RETROFIT PROGRAMSan Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge East Span Replacement ProjectYerba Buena Island Transition Structures (YBITS)

The YBITS #2 contract involves dismantling the detour viaduct, constructing a new eastbound on-ramp to the bridge, completing the bicycle/pedestrian path to Yerba Buena Island, and dismantling of the cantilever.

The contract was awarded to California Engineering Contractors Inc/Silverado Contractors Inc., Joint Venture on November 28, 2012. Initial startup activities and submittals began in March 2013, with actual dismantling starting after the seismic safety opening on Labor Day weekend 2013.

Status: Cantilever removal was completed in July2015. The eastbound on-ramp was opened on June 2, 2016. The opening of the bicycle/pedestrian path to the island has been delayed because of the delay in delivery of the cantilever outrigger beams. The pedestrian/bicycle path is scheduled to be opened in the summer of 2016.

Aerial View of the Old Bridge and Demolition and the Transition Structure

Birds-Eye View Simulation of the Yerba Buena Island Transition Structures and the New San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge Eastbound On Ramp and Bicycle Path after Dismantling of the Existing Structure

On-ramp and Bicycle/Pedestrian Pathway Progress

Rendering of the Completed On-Ramps and Structures

West Approach West Span6


The contractor has sequenced the bridge removal operations into seven phases of dismantling. These phases begin with the upper deck and initial truss removal operations, through the removal of the 504’ and 288’ steel truss spans, to the removal of the supporting steel columns.

Status: The upper deck of the old span has been removed to lighten the bridge. The first 504’ main truss (out of five) were lowered down to barges in February 2016, and the last 504’ section is scheduled to be lowered in August 2016. The first 288’ section is scheduled to be lowered in October 2016.

TOLL BRIDGE SEISMIC RETROFIT PROGRAMSan Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge East Span Replacement ProjectFormer East Span Bridge Dismantling

504’/288’ Superstructure DismantlingApproved Capital Outlay Budget: $103.5 MContractor: CEC & Silverado JVStatus: 60% Complete as of June 2016

Dismantling of the Former Superstructure

Dismantling Progress of the Former Superstructure

Yerba Buena Island Transition SAS Skyway Oakland Touchdown 7


The original east span of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge was supported by 21 in-water bridge piers, Piers E2 through E22, along with land based piers at Yerba Buena Island and Oakland. Part of this project is the demolition of Pier E3, which is located 1,535 feet east of Yerba Buena Island and on the east side of a 50-foot deep navigation channel.

The original authorization covered the dismantling of the piers via mechanical means such as saw cutting, flame cutting, mechanical splitting or pulverizing, and hydro-cutting, but did not cover the use of controlled implosion.

Caltrans proposed to remove Pier E3 as a pilot/demonstration project for the effective use of controlled charges to remove the marine foundations of the original SFOBB. Dismantling of Pier E3 used controlled charges and was completed in four phases: 1) mechanical dismantling of pier cap and fender system, 2) drilling of bore holes into caisson and buttress walls and installing a blast attenuation system (BAS), 3) installing charges, activating the BAS and imploding the pier, and 4) management and removal of remaining dismantling pier debris. The pier was removed to -51 feet.

Mechanical dismantling would have required the installation of a cofferdam around Pier E3, which would have required 394 piles of various types. Pile driving alone would take approximately four years, while the four phases of the demonstration project would occur within six months. Using this method is a significant cost risk to the program.

The marine foundation removal is a CMGC (Construction Manager / General Contractor)contract and the selected CMGC contractor is a Kiewit Manson team (KM).

TOLL BRIDGE SEISMIC RETROFIT PROGRAMSan Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge East Span Replacement ProjectFormer East Span Bridge Dismantling

Piers E4 - E5:The contract was awarded to the KM team in April 2016. The schedule for the demolition by implosion for piers E4 and E5 is for October/November of 2016. The PDT team is coordinating permits for the completion for piers E4 - E18 and in parallel, the PDT team is seeking permits from resource agencies for a “retain in place” for pier E2, and E19 through E22.

Status: On November 14, 2016, Caltrans successfully removed the old Pier E3 footing by implosion with minimal environmental impact. The implosion process has the least amount of impact on the environment and is less costly. Caltrans is now in the process of seeking environmental approvals for removal of the remaining marine foundation piers by the implosion process and negotiating a contract with the contractor for the work.

Marine Foundations RemovalApproved Capital Outlay Budget: $17.5 M for Pier E3 $130 M for Piers E4 - E18Contractor: Kiewit/Manson

Dismantling of the Former Superstructure

Pier E3 Before Implosion

Pier E3 During Implosion

8


Self-Anchored Suspension Bridge Superstructure ContractApproved Capital Outlay Budget: $2.05 BContractor: American Bridge/Fluor Enterprises, JVStatus: 100% Completed

TOLL BRIDGE SEISMIC RETROFIT PROGRAM

San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge East Span Replacement Project

The self-anchored suspension span (SAS) of the bridge is not just another suspension bridge. Rising 525 feet above mean sea level and embedded in bedrock, the single-tower SAS span is designed to withstand a massive earthquake. Traditional main cable suspension bridges have twin cables with smaller suspender cables connected to them. While there appears to be two main cables on the SAS, it is actually a single continuous cable. This single cable is anchored within the eastern end of the roadway, carried over the tower and then wrapped around the two side-by-side decks at the western end.

The single-steel tower is made up of four separate legs connected by shear link beams, which function much like a fuse in an electrical circuit. These beams will absorb most of the impact from an earthquake, preventing damage to the tower legs

Self-Anchored Suspension Bridge Superstructure

Status: The TBPOC authorized Caltrans to close out the Self-Anchored Suspension (SAS) span contract with the joint venture of American Bridge/Fluor (ABF). The contract is to be closed out under the terms and conditions consistent with the findings of the July 2013 TBPOC meeting investigative report that found three parties – the contractor, designer, and Caltrans – responsible for the failure of the high-strength rods on the east pier (E2) of the SAS, and the $24 million cost of the “saddle retrofit” repair.

9

TOLL BRIDGE SEISMIC RETROFIT PROGRAMRisk Management Program Update Potential Draw On Program Reserve (Program Contingency)Caltrans continues to implement comprehensive risk management on all TBSRP projects in accordance with AB 144. Risk response efforts continue to focus on mitigating the estimated cost and schedule impacts of identified risks. The “bottom line” of cost risk analysis is whether the Program Contingency remains adequate to cover all identified risks.

Each contract has a contingency allowance within its budget. The sum of these contingency allowances is compared to the total of capital outlay, capital outlay support and program-wide risks. Any excess of the risks over the contingency allowances represents a potential draw on the program contingency. The program contingency is currently $67.7 million in accordance with the TBPOC approved budget. As of the end of the second quarter of 2016, the 50 percent probable draw on program contingency is $184 million. The potential draw ranges from about $100 million to $ 270 million (refer to Figure 1).

Since 2010, $483 million was removed from the TBSRP bringing the current TBPOC approved budget to $8.952 billion. The program contingency is currently insufficient to cover the cost of identified risks and it is likely that BATA will need to allocate additional toll funds from its reserves to pay for the remainder of the work.

RISK MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENTS

Self-Anchored Suspension Span ContractContract Close Out: The SAS contract was accepted on September 24, 2015. The estimate after acceptance included several deductions as credit for issues that Caltrans determined were the responsibility of the contractor. The proposed final estimate was run October 29, 2015. The contractor submitted his exceptions to the proposed final estimate on November 6, 2015. The contractor documented twelve outstanding disputes totaling $49.2 million in claims. The project team will work with the contractor, the Toll Bridge Oversight Committee (TBPOC) and the California State Transportation Agency to expedite the claims process in an attempt to get to an agreement. This effort could take several quarters to completely address and may need to be addressed in arbitration.

Repair of Rod Grouting at the Tower Base: The investigation of the tower base anchor rods is complete and a final report will be issued early in the third quarter of 2016. A scope of work for the repair was developed and on May 12, 2016, the TBPOC approved the procurement of a $12 million contract to implement the repair. The TBPOC also authorized $3 million in Construction Outlay Support (COS) costs to inspect and administer that contract.

Yerba Buena Island Transition Structure #2 ContractSouthgate Road Realignment Alternative: Meetings between all the stakeholders on Yerba Buena Island have identified a more efficient alternative for routing traffic on Southgate Road. This alternative will significantly increase the level of service of the on-ramp and off-ramps to I-80. The City of Francisco developed this proposal to realign Southgate Road that was approved by the TBPOC on May 12, 2016. The proposal significantly reduced future risks on the YBITS #2 contract.

504’/288’ Dismantling ContractSuccessful Removal of Four 504’ Trusses: The successful removal of four spans of the superstructure puts the contractor on schedule to deliver the E4 and E5 footings to the marine foundations removal contractor ahead of the contract milestones.

Bird Deterrents & Mitigation: Based on knowledge gained from effective bird exclusion measures developed on the cantilever demolition, a project specification was developed for bird deterrence on the 504’/288’ contract. The contractor intends to sequence work so as to remove the steel spans outside the nesting season where practical, and install the deterrents contemplated in the plans as applicable. Should a bird still manage to nest on the bridge, the environmental team has secured a Miscellaneous Permit from USF&W that will allow the project biologist to relocate bird nests and help prevent delays to the work. Once the nests are relocated from the bridge, Caltrans has a service contract with International Bird Rescue (IBR) to transport eggs and young, incubate eggs and foster young as necessary and release birds back into their natural habitat. Successful bird deterrence in the past has resulted in no delays to the SFOBB from bird nesting issues.

*Figure 1 Notes: 1. Proposed architectural enhancements and project improvements are excluded unless approved by the TBPOC.

Figure 1 – Potential Draw on Program Contingency*

10


Marine Foundation Removal ContractAward of E4-E18 Construction Manager/General Contractor (CMGC) Contract: The project team successfully negotiated and awarded its second CMGC contract for $130 million, well under the engineer’s estimate of $166 million.

RISK MANAGEMENT LOOK AHEAD

Self-Anchored Suspension Span ContractThe contract close-out effort will continue. The support cost budget will continue to be spent until final close-out is achieved.

Yerba Buena Island Transition Structure #2 ContractSouthgate Road Realignment Alternative: The project team will negotiate the deletion of a portion of the contract to accommodate the new Southgate Road alignment. Actual contract completion should be brought forward by five months from the current scheduled completion date as a result of this significant change. This change will help mitigate any future delays of the YBITS #2 contract.

504’/288’ Dismantling ContractRemoval of last 504’ Span: The removal of the last 504’ span is scheduled for the third quarter of 2016. A timely completion of this work will allow the contractor to successfully complete the transfer of piers to the marine structures dismantling contractor, in accordance with the 504’/288’ dismantling contract milestones.

Marine Foundations Removal ContractPermit Acquisition for Remainder of Contract: The project team needs to secure a permit for implosion as the removal method for all the piers. The results of Pier E3 demonstration have had a strong impact on reducing the cost and schedule risks of the remaining piers. The project team has used the data from the successful E3 implosion to help develop the permit application that was submitted to the resource agencies in the second quarter of 2016. Approval of the permit is needed by early September 2016 in order to avoid a delay in the work going forward.

SFOBB East Span Capital Outlay SupportBudget Increase: The current approved budget of $1.312 million for the SFOBB East Span COS will be depleted early in the fourth quarter of 2016. In the third quarter of 2016, the TBPOC will need to approve the 2016/17 COS allocation and implement an increase in the overall SFOBB East Span COS budget.

11


Bicycle/Pedestrian Pathway Progress Looking West toward Yerba Buena Island and Downtown San Francisco

Program Funding StatusAB 144 established a funding level of $8.685 billion for the TBSRP. As of January 1, 2010, seismic retrofitting of Antioch and Dumbarton Bridges became part of the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program with the passage of AB 1175, which provided another $750 million bringing the total funding to $9.435 billion. On April 9, 2010, the TBPOC approved a $137 million reduction in the TBSRP program budget as a result of savings from the Antioch Bridge Retrofit. On September 2, 2010, the TBPOC approved a $216 million reduction in the TBSRP program budget as a result of savings from the Dumbarton Bridge Retrofit. And finally, on November 5, 2013, the TBPOC approved a $130 million reduction in the TBSRP program budget as a result of a reduction in the program contingency, bringing the current approved TBSRP budget to $8.952 billion (see Appendix A-1). The program funding sources are shown in Table 1 - Program Budget.

Table 1—Program Budget as of May 31, 2016 ($ Millions)

TOLL BRIDGE SEISMIC RETROFIT PROGRAM

Table 1 - Program Budget as of May 31, 2015Budgeted

Funding Available & Contribution

FinancingSeismic Surcharge Revenue AB 1171 2,282.0 2,282.0 Seismic Surcharge Revenue AB 144 2,150.0 2,150.0 Seismic Surcharge Revenue AB 1175 (2) 750.0 750.0 BATA Consolidation 820.0 820.0 Subtotal - Financing 6,002.0 6,002.0

ContributionsProposition 192 790.0 789.0 San Diego Coronado Toll Bridge Revenue Fund 33.0 33.0 Vincent Thomas Bridge 15.0 6.9 State Highway Account(1) 745.0 745.0 Public Transportation Account (1) 130.0 130.0 ITIP/SHOPP/Federal Contingency (3) 448.0 448.0 Federal Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation (HBRR) (3) 642.0 642.0 SHA - East Span Dismantling 300.0 300.0 SHA - “Efficiency Savings” 130.0 130.0 Redirect Spillover 125.0 125.0 Motor Vehicle Account 75.0 75.0 Subtotal - Contribution 3,433.0 3,423.9

Total Funding 9,435.0 9,425.9

Encumbered to Date 8,795.5

Remaining Unallocated 630.4

Expenditures :Capital Outlay 6,653.8 State Operations 1,845.0 Antioch and Dumbarton Expenditures by BATA 14.6

Total Expenditures 8,513.4

Encumbrances : Capital Outlay 278.3 State Operations 3.9

Total Encumbrances 282.2

Total Expenditures and Encumbrances 8,795.5 (1) The California Transportation Commission adopted a new schedule and changed the PTA/SHA split on December 15, 2005. (2)As of January 1, 2010, seismic retrofitting of Antioch and Dumbarton Bridges became part of the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program with the passage of AB 1175. (3) The Skyway contract is the only contract in the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge East Span Seismic Safety Project with federal funds. The Federal Aid Project No. is 0801(090) for the amount of $321,645,209.22.

12


Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 30952.1 (d), expenses incurred by Caltrans, BATA, and the California Transportation Commission (CTC) for costs directly related to the duties associated with the TBPOC are to be reimbursed by toll revenues. Table 3 -Toll Bridge Program Oversight Committee Estimated Expenses: July 1, 2005, through May 31, 2016, shows expenses through May 31, 2016, for TBPOC functioning, support, and monthly and quarterly reporting.

Summary of the Toll Bridge Oversight Committee (TBPOC) Expenses

Table 2—CTC Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program Contributions Adopted December 2005Schedule of Contributions to the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program ($ Millions)

Source Description 2005-06(Actual)

2006-07(Actual)

2007-08(Actual)

2008-09(Actual)

2009-10(Actual)

2010-11(Actual)

2011-12(Actual)

2012-13(Actual)

2013-14(Actual) Total

AB1171

SHA 290 290PTA 80 40 120Highway BridgeReplacementandRehabilitation(HBRR)

100 100 100 42 342

Contingency 1 99 100 100 148 448

AB 144

SHA* 2 8 53 50 17 130Motor VehicleAccount (MVA)

75 75

Spillover 125 125SHA** 300 300Total 547 273 100 43 99 153 150 165 300 1830

* Caltrans Efficiency Savings** SFOBB East Span Dismantling Cost. The last contribution of $300 million from SHA was made in October 2013 as scheduled.

Table 3—Toll Bridge Program Oversight Committee Estimated Expenses: July 1, 2005 through May 31, 2016 ($ Millions)

Agency/Program Activity Expenses

BATA 3.0

Caltrans 3.4

CTC 3.3

Reporting 5.9

Total Program 15.6

13


Overall environmental compliance for the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge (SFOBB) East Span Seismic Safety (SFOBB) Project has been a success during the second quarter of 2016. The tasks for the current quarter are focused on mitigation, monitoring, and environmental permitting. Key successes in this quarter are as follows:

Bird monitoring has been conducted seven days a week since February 1st, corresponding with the start of the 2016 bird nesting season. The goal of this monitoring is to document potential impacts to birds and their nests from construction activities. Monitors did not observe any indication that birds were disturbed due to the east span construction activities. To date, over 10 occupied nests have been removed from the SFOBB project site under the Caltrans’ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service occupied nest take permit.

Throughout the second quarter of 2016, installation of nesting bird impact avoidance management measures for the 2016 nesting season continued for the 504/288 dismantling contract. The contractor installed bird deterrents on the 504-foot trusses, 288-foot trusses, and tower legs. Meetings have been held weekly throughout the quarter between Caltrans and the 504/288 contractor to discuss bird nesting issues and the ongoing strategy for installation of nesting bird impact avoidance management measures during the 2016 nesting season.

In compliance with Special Condition II.A.1 of the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) Permit No. 2001.008, the environmental team obtained plan review approval from BCDC for the 504/288 contract tower 4 to 16 dismantling plans on April 7, 2016. The environmental team also supported 504-foot truss span removal operations throughout the second quarter of 2016.

The SFOBB Pier E3 Implosion Demonstration Project Report was finalized in May 2016 and was submitted to all applicable resource agencies on May 13, 2016. This report summarized the pier E3 Demonstration Project hydroacoustic monitoring, fisheries monitoring, marine mammal monitoring, bird monitoring, and water quality monitoring results.

The environmental team held teleconferences and meetings with BCDC, National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), US Coast Guard (USCG), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), and Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) throughout the second quarter of 2016 to discuss regulatory approvals for the removal of piers E4 to E18.

The environmental team coordinated a stakeholder meeting with representatives from Golden Gate Audubon Society, Sierra Club, Bay Keeper, and the Marine Mammal Center on June 8, 2016. The purpose of this meeting was to present project stakeholders with a summary of the results of the Pier E3 Demonstration Project, explain the proposed Pier E4 to E18 removal strategy, and hear the field stakeholder comments regarding the blasting program.

The environmental team worked closely with the project management team to prepare and submit packages to BCDC, NMFS, USACE, CDFW, and the RWQCB requesting approval to remove Piers E4 to E18 using controlled blasting. An Incidental Harassment Authorization request to NMFS Office of Protected Resources and a Biological Assessment to NMFS was submitted during the first quarter of 2016.

During the second quarter of 2016, the environmental team submitted an amendment request for pre-blast activities to BCDC on April 4, 2016, a Letter of Modification (LOM) request for pre-blast activities to USACE on April 4, 2016, an Incidental Take Permit application to CDFW on April 8, 2016, an amendment request for blasting to BCDC on May 12, 2016, a LOM request for blasting to USACE on May 6, 2016, and a SWPPP to the RWQCB on May 16, 2016. Authorizations were received from BCDC and USACE for pre-blast activities on June 21, 2016 and June 27, 2016, respectively. On June 27, 2016, BCDC Plan

Approval for pre-blast activities for Piers E4 to E18 was issued. The RWQCB approved the Pier E4 to E18 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) on June 22, 2016. The environmental team will continue to work closely with the regulatory agencies to obtain necessary approvals for the removal of Piers E4 to E18 throughout the third quarter of 2016.

TOLL BRIDGE SEISMIC RETROFIT PROGRAMQuarterly Environmental Compliance Highlights

APPENDICES

A. TBSRP AB 144/SB 66/ AB 1175 Baseline Budget, Forecasts and Expenditures through May 31, 2016 (A-1 and A-2)

B. TBSRP (SFOBB East Span Only) AB 144/SB 66 Baseline Budget, Forecasts and Expenditures through May 31, 2016

C. Project Photos

D. Glossary of Terms

At the request of BATA and the TBPOC, the environmental team discussed the potential retention of Piers E2 and Piers E19 to E23 of the SFOBB original east span with project regulators during the second quarter of 2016. It was clarified by BCDC that the Caltrans would need to propose a justification for pier retention, a conceptual plan, and possible mitigation to offset the in-water fill that the project is required to remove under its current permit as mitigation for new fill in the Bay from construction of the SFOBB new east span.

Caltrans held meetings with BATA and the Project Management Team (PMT) to discuss how best to proceed. Public access has been proposed as the justification for pier retention. Caltrans has indicated that to retain the piers, additional work would be required that may include, development of a conceptual design for public access, an analysis of environmental impacts from pier retention, a re-opening of the project’s current Final Environmental Impact Statement or a separate National Environmental Policy Act/California Environmental Quality Act process, and analysis of potential off-site fill removal projects or mechanisms to satisfy in-kind mitigation should it be required.

16


Contract

AB 144/SB 66/AB 1175 Approved

Changes

Current Approved

Budget(05/2016)

Cost to Date(05/2016)

Cost Forecast(05/2016)

At-Completion

Variancea c d e = c + d f g h = g - e

SFOBB East Span Replacement ProjectCapital Outlay Support 959.3 352.2 1,311.5 1,297.0 1,394.2 82.7 Capital Outlay Construction 4,492.2 670.5 5,162.7 4,838.0 5,275.2 112.5 Other Budgeted Capital 35.1 (32.8) 2.3 0.7 2.3 -

Total 5,486.6 989.9 6,476.5 6,135.7 6,671.7 195.2 SFOBB West Approach Replacement

Capital Outlay Support 120.0 (0.5) 119.5 119.4 119.4 (0.1)Capital Outlay Construction 309.0 31.0 340.0 333.0 338.1 (1.9)

Total 429.0 30.5 459.5 452.4 457.5 (2.0)SFOBB West Span Retrofit -

Capital Outlay Support 75.0 (0.2) 74.8 74.8 74.8 - Capital Outlay Construction 232.9 (2.4) 230.5 230.5 230.5 -

Total 307.9 (2.6) 305.3 305.3 305.3 - Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Retrofit*

Capital Outlay Support 134.0 (7.0) 127.0 126.7 127.0 - Capital Outlay Construction 780.0 (94.9) 685.1 668.1 668.2 (16.9)

Total 914.0 (101.9) 812.1 794.8 795.2 - Benicia-Martinez Bridge Retrofit -

Capital Outlay Support 38.1 - 38.1 38.1 38.1 - Capital Outlay Construction 139.7 - 139.7 139.7 139.7 -

Total 177.8 - 177.8 177.8 177.8 - Carquinez Bridge Retrofit

Capital Outlay Support 28.7 0.1 28.8 28.8 28.8 - Capital Outlay Construction 85.5 (0.1) 85.4 85.4 85.4 -

Total 114.2 - 114.2 114.2 114.2 - San Mateo-Hayward Retrofit -

Capital Outlay Support 28.1 - 28.1 28.1 28.1 - Capital Outlay Construction 135.4 (0.1) 135.3 135.3 135.3 -

Total 163.5 (0.1) 163.4 163.4 163.4 - Vincent Thomas Bridge Retrofit (Los Angeles)

Capital Outlay Support 16.4 - 16.4 16.4 16.4 - Capital Outlay Construction 42.1 - 42.1 42.0 42.0 (0.1)

Total 58.5 - 58.5 58.4 58.4 (0.1)San Diego-Coronado Bridge Retrofit

Capital Outlay Support 33.5 - 33.5 33.2 33.2 (0.3)Capital Outlay Construction 70.0 - 70.0 69.4 69.4 (0.6)

Total 103.5 - 103.5 102.6 102.6 (0.9)

Appendix A-1: TBSRP AB 144/SB 66/AB 1175 Baseline Budget, Forecasts and Expenditures through May 31, 2016 ($ Millions)

17


Appendix A-1: TBSRP AB 144/SB 66/AB 1175 Baseline Budget, Forecasts and Expenditures through May 31, 2016 ($ Millions) Cont.

* Budget for Richmond-San Rafael Bridge includes $16.9 million of deck joint rehabilitation work that considered to be eligible for seismic retrofit program funding.** AB144/SB66 established a funding level of $8.685 Billion in July 2005 for TBSRP, AB1175 added the retrofitting of the Antioch and Dumbarton Bridges in January 2010, providing another $750 million in funding, bringing Total Toll Seismic Retrofit Program funding to $9.435 Billion. Since 2010, $483 million has been removed from the program, bringing the current TBPOC Approved Budget to $8.952 Billion. The $483 million removed consisted of:

Antioch Savings (4/12/10) $137 million Dumbarton Savings (9/02/10) $216 million Program Contingency Redirection (11/05/13) $130 million, the current TBPOC approved Program Budget is $8,952 million.

*** (Due to the rounding of numbers, the totals above are show within $0.02).

Contract

AB 144/SB 66/AB 1175 Approved

Changes

Current Approved

Budget(05/2016)



At-Completion


Antioch BridgeCapital Outlay Support - 24.1 24.1 17.4 23.8 (0.3)Capital Outlay Support by BATA 6.7 Capital Outlay Construction - 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 -

Total 267.0 71.1 71.1 71.1 70.8 (0.3)Dumbarton Bridge

Capital Outlay Support - 46.0 46.0 39.5 45.4 (0.6)Capital Outlay Support by BATA 7.9 Capital Outlay Construction - 66.4 66.4 64.6 66.4 -

Total 483.0 112.4 112.4 112.0 111.8 (0.6)

Subtotal Capital Outlay Support 1,682.9 165.0 1,847.8 1,834.1 1,929.2 81.4 Subtotal Capital Outlay 6,787.1 217.2 7,004.2 6,653.1 7,097.2 93.0 Subtotal Other Budgeted Capital 35.1 (32.8) 2.3 0.7 2.3 - Miscellaneous Program Costs 30.0 - 30.0 25.5 30.0 - Subtotal Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program 8,535.0 349.3 8,884.3 8,513.4 9,058.7 174.4 Net Programmatic Risks - - - - 9.8 9.8 Program Contingency 900.0 (832.3) 67.7 - - (67.7)

Total Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program ** 9,435.0 (483.0) 8,952.0 8,513.4 9,068.5 116.5 ***

Forecast Deficit to Current TBPOC Approved Budget (116.5)

Forecast Surplus to Total TBPOC Budget 366.5 Forecast Deficit to Current TBPOC Approved Budget (116.5)

18


Appendix A-2: TBSRP AB 144/SB 66 Baseline Budget, Forecasts and Expenditures through May 31, 2016 ($ Millions)

BridgeAB 144 Baseline

BudgetTBPOC Current

Approved Budget

Expenditures to date and

encumbrancesas of (05/2016)

see Note (1)

Estimated costs not yet spent or encumbered as

of (05/2016)

Total Forecast as of (05/2016)

a b c d e f = d + eOther Completed Projects

Capital Outlay Support 144.9 144.9 144.6 - 144.6 Capital Outlay 472.6 472.5 471.9 (0.1) 471.8 Total 617.5 617.4 616.5 (0.1) 616.4

Richmond-San RafaelCapital Outlay Support 134.0 127.0 126.8 0.2 127.0 Capital Outlay 698.0 685.1 667.5 0.7 668.2 Project Reserves 82.0 - - - - Total 914.0 812.1 794.3 0.9 795.2

West Span RetrofitCapital Outlay Support 75.0 74.8 74.8 - 74.8 Capital Outlay 232.9 230.5 227.4 3.1 230.5 Total 307.9 305.3 302.2 3.1 305.3

West ApproachCapital Outlay Support 120.0 119.5 119.5 (0.1) 119.4 Capital Outlay 309.0 340.0 332.2 5.9 338.1 Total 429.0 459.5 451.7 5.8 457.5

SFOBB East Span - SkywayCapital Outlay Support 197.0 181.2 181.2 - 181.2 Capital Outlay 1,293.0 1,237.2 1,235.6 0.1 1,235.7 Total 1,490.0 1,418.4 1,416.8 0.1 1,416.9

SFOBB East Span - SAS - SuperstructureCapital Outlay Support 214.6 488.1 512.4 5.4 517.8 Capital Outlay 1,753.7 2,046.8 2,046.9 2.1 2,049.0 Total 1,968.3 2,534.9 2,559.3 7.5 2,566.8

SFOBB East Span - SAS - FoundationsCapital Outlay Support 62.5 37.6 37.6 - 37.6 Capital Outlay 339.9 301.3 301.3 - 301.3 Total 402.4 338.9 338.9 - 338.9

Small YBI ProjectsCapital Outlay Support 10.6 10.2 10.2 0.4 10.6 Capital Outlay 15.6 15.2 15.2 0.5 15.7 Total 26.2 25.4 25.4 0.9 26.3

YBI DetourCapital Outlay Support 29.5 87.7 87.9 (0.2) 87.7 Capital Outlay 131.9 473.3 473.4 (0.1) 473.3 Total 161.4 561.0 561.3 (0.3) 561.0

YBI- Transition Structures Capital Outlay Support 78.7 127.5 134.6 30.0 164.6 Capital Outlay 299.4 299.4 302.8 23.7 326.5 Total 378.1 426.9 437.4 53.7 491.1

19


Appendix A-2: TBSRP AB 144/SB 66 Baseline Budget, Forecasts and Expenditures through May 31, 2016 ($ Millions) Cont.

Contract

AB 144 Baseline Budget

TBPOC Current Approved Budget

Expenditures to date and

encumbrancesas of (05/2016)

see Note (1)

Estimated costs not yet spent or

encumbered as of (05/2016)

Total Forecast as of (05/2016)

a b c d e f = d + e

Oakland TouchdownCapital Outlay Support 74.4 119.4 118.2 1.2 119.4 Capital Outlay 283.8 330.6 325.4 4.3 329.7 Total 358.2 450.0 443.6 5.5 449.1

East Span Other Small ProjectsCapital Outlay Support 212.3 197.9 197.9 (0.1) 197.8 Capital Outlay 170.8 141.3 126.5 10.4 136.9 Total 383.1 339.2 324.4 10.3 334.7

Existing Bridge DismantlingCapital Outlay Support 79.7 61.9 23.1 54.4 77.5 Capital Outlay 239.2 320.1 292.6 116.0 408.6 Total 318.9 382.0 315.7 170.4 486.1

Antioch BridgeCapital Outlay Support - 24.1 17.4 0.2 17.6 Capital Outlay Support by BATA 6.2 - 6.2 Capital Outlay - 47.0 47.0 - 47.0 Total 267.0 71.1 70.6 0.2 70.8

Dumbarton BridgeCapital Outlay Support - 46.0 39.6 (0.2) 39.4 Capital Outlay Support by BATA 6.0 - 6.0 Capital Outlay - 66.4 64.7 1.7 66.4 Total 483.0 112.4 110.3 1.5 111.8

Miscellaneous Program Costs 30.0 30.0 25.5 4.5 30.0 Total Capital Outlay Support 1,712.9 1,877.8 1,863.5 95.8 1,959.3 Total Capital Outlay 6,822.1 7,006.6 6,930.3 168.5 7,098.8 Program Total 1 8,535.0 8,884.4 8,793.8 264.3 9,058.1

(1) Total Capital Outlay Support includes program indirect costs.(2) BSA provided a distribution of program contingency in December 2004 based on Bechtel Infrastructure Corporation input.(3) Construction administration of the OTD Detour is under the YBITS1 contract. Encumbrance is included in YBITS1 contract.(4) Construction administration of the cantilever segment is under the YBITS2 contract. Encumbrance is included in YBITS2 contract.(Due to the rounding of numbers, the totals above are shown within $0.02)

20


Appendix B: TBSRP (SFOBB East Span Only) AB 144/SB 66 Baseline Budget, Forecasts and Expenditures through May 31, 2016 ($ Millions)

Contract

AB 144 / SB66 Budget(07/2005)

ApprovedChanges

Current Approved

Budget(05/2016)



At-Completion


San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge East Span Replacement Project

East Span - SAS SuperstructureCapital Outlay Support 214.6 273.5 488.1 509.7 517.8 29.7 Capital Outlay Construction 1,753.7 293.1 2,046.8 1,972.5 2,049.0 2.2

Total 1,968.3 566.6 2,534.9 2,482.2 2,566.8 31.9 SAS W2 Foundations

Capital Outlay Support 10.0 (0.8) 9.2 9.2 9.2 - Capital Outlay Construction 26.4 0.1 26.5 26.5 26.5 -

Total 36.4 (0.7) 35.7 35.7 35.7 - YBI South/South Detour

Capital Outlay Support 29.4 58.3 87.7 87.9 87.7 - Capital Outlay Construction 131.9 341.4 473.3 473.3 473.3 -

Total 161.3 399.7 561.0 561.2 561.0 - East Span - Skyway

Capital Outlay Support 197.0 (15.8) 181.2 181.2 181.2 - Capital Outlay Construction 1,293.0 (55.8) 1,237.2 1,235.6 1,235.7 (1.5)

Total 1,490.0 (71.6) 1,418.4 1,416.8 1,416.9 (1.5)East Span - SAS E2/T1 Foundations -

Capital Outlay Support 52.5 (24.1) 28.4 28.4 28.4 - Capital Outlay Construction 313.5 (38.7) 274.8 274.8 274.8 -

Total 366.0 (62.8) 303.2 303.2 303.2 - YBI Transition Structures (see notes below)

Capital Outlay Support 78.7 48.8 127.5 132.7 164.6 37.1 Capital Outlay Construction 299.3 0.1 299.4 264.4 326.5 27.1

Total 378.0 48.9 426.9 397.1 491.1 64.2 * YBI- Transition Structures

Capital Outlay Support 16.4 16.4 16.4 - Capital Outlay Construction - - - -

Total 16.4 16.4 16.4 - * YBI- Transition Structures Contract No. 1

Capital Outlay Support 72.1 69.8 69.8 (2.3)Capital Outlay Construction 203.7 206.9 204.9 1.2

Total 275.8 276.7 274.7 (1.1)* YBI- Transition Structures Contract No. 2

Capital Outlay Support 38.0 46.3 77.4 39.4 Capital Outlay Construction 92.4 57.5 118.3 25.9

Total 130.4 103.8 195.7 65.3 * YBI- Transition Structures Contract No. 3 Landscape

Capital Outlay Support 1.0 0.2 1.0 - Capital Outlay Construction 3.3 - 3.3 -

Total 4.3 - 4.3 -

21


Appendix B: TBSRP (SFOBB East Span Only) AB 144/SB 66 Baseline Budget, Forecasts and Expenditures through May 31, 2016 ($ Millions) Cont.

Contract

AB 144 / SB66 Budget(07/2005)

ApprovedChanges

Current Approved

Budget(05/2016)

Cost to Date (05/2016)


At-Completion


Oakland Touchdown (see notes below)Capital Outlay Support 74.4 45.0 119.4 119.0 119.4 - Capital Outlay Construction 283.8 46.8 330.6 322.1 329.7 (0.9)

Total 358.2 91.8 450.0 441.1 449.1 (0.9) * OTD Prior-to-Split Costs

Capital Outlay Support 21.7 20.0 20.1 (1.6)Capital Outlay Construction - - - -

Total 21.7 20.0 20.1 (1.6) * OTD Submarine Cable(1)

Capital Outlay Support 0.9 0.9 0.9 - Capital Outlay Construction 5.7 5.7 5.7 -

Total 6.6 6.6 6.6 - * OTD No. 1 (Westbound)

Capital Outlay Support 51.3 51.2 51.2 (0.1)Capital Outlay Construction 205.3 202.8 205.3 -

Total 256.6 254.0 256.5 (0.1) * OTD No. 2 (Eastbound)

Capital Outlay Support 35.9 38.1 37.6 1.7 Capital Outlay Construction 72.6 71.2 71.9 (0.7)

Total 108.5 109.3 109.5 1.0 * OTD Touchdown 2 Detour(2)

Capital Outlay Support 8.1 8.0 8.1 - Capital Outlay Construction 47.0 42.3 46.8 (0.2)

Total 55.1 50.3 54.9 (0.2) * OTD Electrical Systems

Capital Outlay Support 1.5 0.8 1.5 - Capital Outlay Construction - - - -

Total 1.5 0.8 1.5 - Existing Bridge Dismantling

Capital Outlay Support 79.7 (17.8) 61.9 21.0 77.5 15.6 Capital Outlay Construction 239.2 80.9 320.1 128.2 408.6 88.5

Total 318.9 63.1 382.0 149.2 486.1 104.1 * Bridge Dismantling Prior-to-Split Cost Capital Outlay Support 3.9 3.9 3.9 Capital Outlay Construction - - - Total 3.9 3.9 3.9 * Cantilever Section

Capital Outlay Support 17.0 1.6 1.6 Capital Outlay Construction 69.0 68.5 69.0

Total 86.0 70.1 70.6 * 504/288 Sections

Capital Outlay Support 21.0 6.9 23.0 Capital Outlay Construction 103.5 42.4 102.3

Total 124.5 49.3 125.3

22



Contract

AB 144 / SB66 Budget(07/2005)

ApprovedChanges

Current Approved

Budget(05/2016)



At-Completion


*Marine Foundations Capital Outlay Support 20.0 8.6 49.0 Capital Outlay Construction 147.5 17.4 237.3

Total 167.5 26.0 286.3 Sunk Cost for Marine Foundation - 5.3 5.3 Pier-3 Demonstration Project Capital Outlay Support - 3.0 3.7 Capital Outlay Construction 17.5 16.7 17.5

Total 17.5 19.7 21.2 Remaining Marine Foundations2

Capital Outlay Support - 0.3 39.8 Capital Outlay Construction 130.0 0.7 219.8 Total 130.0 1.0 259.6

Pier-E4 to Pier-E18 Capital Outlay Support - 0.3 31.5 Capital Outlay Construction 130.0 0.7 174.8 Total 130.0 1.0 206.3 Pier-E2 and Pier-E19 to Pier-E22 Capital Outlay Support - 0.1 8.3 Capital Outlay Construction - - 45.0 Total - 0.1 53.3 YBI/SAS Archeology


Total 2.2 - 2.2 2.2 2.2 - YBI - USCG Road Relocation

Capital Outlay Support 3.0 (0.3) 2.7 2.7 3.0 0.3 Capital Outlay Construction 3.0 (0.2) 2.8 2.8 3.0 0.2

Total 6.0 (0.5) 5.5 5.5 6.0 0.5 YBI - Substation and Viaduct

Capital Outlay Support 6.5 (0.1) 6.4 6.4 6.5 0.1 Capital Outlay Construction 11.6 (0.3) 11.3 11.3 11.6 0.3

Total 18.1 (0.4) 17.7 17.7 18.1 0.4 Oakland Geofill -


Total 10.7 - 10.7 10.7 10.7 - Pile Installation Demonstration Project

Capital Outlay Support 1.8 - 1.8 1.8 1.8 - Capital Outlay Construction 9.3 (0.1) 9.2 9.3 9.3 -

Total 11.1 (0.1) 11.0 11.1 11.1 -

23


(1) Current contract allotment to install two submarine electrical cables is $11.5 million. Additional non-program funding to support this allocation beyond the $9.6 million of available programs funds has been made available by the Treasure Island

Development Authority.

(2) Construction administration of the OTD Detour is under the YBITS#1 contract.

(3) Construction administration of the Cantilever segment is under the YBITS#2 contract.

(Due to the rounding of numbers, the totals above are shown within $0.02).


Contract

AB 144 / SB66 Budget(07/2005)

ApprovedChanges

Current Approved

Budget(05/2016)



At-Completion


Stormwater Treatment MeasuresCapital Outlay Support 6.0 2.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 - Capital Outlay Construction 15.0 3.3 18.3 16.9 17.0 (1.3)

Total 21.0 5.5 26.5 25.1 25.2 (1.3)Right-of-Way and Environmental Mitigation

Capital Outlay Support - - - - - - Capital Outlay & Right-of-Way 72.4 - 72.4 60.2 70.0 (2.4)Total 72.4 - 72.4 60.2 70.0 (2.4)

Sunk Cost - Existing East Span RetrofitCapital Outlay Support 39.5 - 39.5 39.5 39.5 - Capital Outlay Construction 30.8 - 30.8 30.8 30.8 - Total 70.3 - 70.3 70.3 70.3 -

Other Capital Outlay SupportEnvironmental Phase 97.7 0.1 97.8 97.8 97.7 (0.1)

Pre-Split Project Expenditures 44.9 - 44.9 44.9 44.9 - Non-Project Specific Costs 20.0 (16.8) 3.2 3.2 3.2 - Total 162.6 (16.7) 145.9 145.9 145.8 (0.1)

Subtotal Capital Outlay Support 959.3 352.2 1,311.5 1,297.0 1,394.2 82.7 Subtotal Capital Outlay Construction 4,492.2 670.5 5,162.7 4,838.0 5,275.2 112.5 Other Budgeted Capital 35.1 (32.8) 2.3 0.7 2.3 -

Total SFOBB East Span Replacement Project 5,486.6 989.9 6,476.5 6,135.7 6,671.7 195.2

24


Self-Anchored Suspension Bridge (SAS)

25


Yerba Buena Island Transition Structure (YBITS)

26


Oakland Touchdown Detour Progress

Dismantling of Former San Francisco/Oakland Bay Bridge

27


Appendix: Glossary of Terms

The information in this report is provided in accordance with California Government code Section 755. This document is one of a series of reports prepared for the Bay Area Toll Authority (BATA)/Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) on the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit and Regional Measure 1 Programs.

Bay Area Management ConsultantsAn Association of URS Corporation and Mott MacDonald

MOTTMACDONALD

M M

Glossary of TermsAB 144/SB 66 BUDGET: The planned allocation of resources for the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program, or subordinate projects or contracts, as provided in Assembly Bill 144 and Senate Bill 66, signed into law by Governor Schwarzenegger on July 18, 2005, and September 29, 2005, respectively.

AB 144/SB 66/AB1175 PROJECT COMPLETE BASELINE: The planned completion date for the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program or subordinate projects or contracts.

APPROVED CHANGES: For cost, changes to the AB 144/SB 66 Budget or BATA Budget as approved by the Bay Area Toll Authority Commission. For schedule, changes to the AB 144/SB 66 Project Complete Baseline approved by the Toll Bridge Program Oversight Committee, or changes to the BATA Project Complete Baseline approved by the Bay Area Toll Authority Commission.

AT COMPLETION VARIANCE or VARIANCE (cost): The mathematical difference between the Cost Forecast and the Current Approved Budget.

BATA BUDGET: The planned allocation of resources for the Regional Measure 1 Program, or subordinate projects or contracts as authorized by the Bay Area Toll Authority as of June 2005.

BATA PROJECT COMPLETE BASELINE: The planned completion date for the Regional Measure 1 Program or subordinate projects or contracts.

CAPITAL OUTLAY SUPPORT (COS): Cost of developing and administering a capital project.

COST FORECAST: The current forecast of all of the costs that are projected to be expended so as to complete the given scope of the program, project, or contract.

COST TO DATE: The actual expenditures incurred by the program, project or contract as of the month and year shown.

CURRENT APPROVED BUDGET: The sum of the AB 144/SB 66 Budget or BATA Budget and Approved Changes.

HINGE PIPE BEAMS: Pipes between roadway sections designed to move within their sleeves during expansion or contraction of the decks during minor events, such as changes in temperature. The beams are designed to absorb the energy of an earthquake by deforming in their middle or “fuse” section. Hinge pipe beams are also found at the western piers where the SAS connects to the YBITS (Hinge “K” pipe beams).

PROJECT COMPLETE CURRENT APPROVED SCHEDULE: The sum of the AB 144/SB 66 Project Complete Baseline or BATA Project Complete Baseline and Approved Changes.

PROJECT COMPLETE SCHEDULE FORECAST: The current projected date for the completion of the program, project, or contract.

SCHEDULE VARIANCE or VARIANCE (schedule): The mathematical difference expressed in months between the Project Complete Schedule Forecast and the Project Complete Current Approved Schedule.

% COMPLETE: % Complete is based on an evaluation of progress on the project, expenditures to date, and schedule.

Memorandum



FR: Steven Whipple, SFOBB Principal Construction Manager , Caltrans/ Deanna Vilcheck, SFOBB Area Construction Manager, Caltrans

RE: Agenda No. – 5a Item – Yerba Buena Island Transition Span (YBITS) 2 Contract- Deletion of Contract Scope Related to Southgate Road – Summary of Cost Savings

Recommendation: Information

Costs: Estimated Savings – TBD Schedule: TBD

Discussion: In the recent TBPOC meeting, the original estimate range for the deletion of the East Bound (EB) off ramp and Southgate road work was a cost savings of approximately $3-$5 million, based on bid item prices and pending final discussions with the contractor. The original scope of work to be deleted included the EB I-80 off ramp to Yerba Buena Island, Southgate roadway and retaining walls, and the YBI transition structure edge beam construction. Subsequent to receiving approval to delete the above work, the construction staging of the YBITS2 contract and the City ramps project were compared in detail and it was decided with concurrence from the PMT and SFCTA/TIDA staff to continue constructing the edge beam on the YBITS 2 contract. The current estimate for deleted work, based on item prices, is $3.8 million. However, negotiations with the contractor continue and it is likely the savings on the project will be approximately $3 million due to sunk costs. The savings from this deletion is included in the YBITS 2 funds request (agenda item 5b). Any capital savings from this deletion transferred from the YBITS 2 approved budget to SFCTA/TIDA will require a commensurate increase to the supplemental funds request for the YBITS 2 contract. Attachment: N/A

1 of 1 Item 5a_Memo-DeleteSouthgate_08Sep16-final.docx

Memorandum



FR: Steven Whipple, SFOBB Principal Construction Manager , Caltrans/ Deanna Vilcheck, SFOBB Area Construction Manager, Caltrans

RE: Agenda No. – 5b Item – Yerba Buena Island Transition Span (YBITS) 2 Contract- Updated Cost Analyses to Complete and Contract Funds Request

Recommendation: Approval

Costs: $9,300,000 (Capital Outlay) Schedule: None if approved

Discussion: In evaluating the YBITS 2 construction contract to incorporate the recent TBPOC decision to proceed with removal of contract work in part to have the Southgate Road scope removed, redesigned by the City and built by the ongoing City ramps project, an analyses was initiated of what the YBITS 2 contract completion costs will be to complete the contract in 2017. This action was done by the team with various factors discussed with the contractor which included the remaining construction work, the impact culmination of this and previous CCOs to date, and the remaining risks identified to achieve completion. It is requested that an additional $9,300,000 be allocated for continuing construction of the YBITS 2 project from the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit budgeted program contingency to fully fund TBPOC approved changes, other anticipated changes, and replenish the contingency balance for the remainder of the project. The project is expected to be finished in summer 2017. Two major portions of the remaining work to be completed through summer 2017 are the embankment confinement system which will be followed by the USCG outer base area on Yerba Buena Island. Both operations are weather dependent. Status of Project Funds The current TBPOC approved capital allocation for the YBITS2 contract is $173,627,000. Capital funding for YBITS 2 has 2 sources: BATA Toll Bridge Rehabilitation Program ($12,300,000), and Toll Seismic ($92,360,000 YBITS and $69,000,000 Cantilever Demolition). The BATA Toll Bridge Rehabilitation Program funds are intended to be used for East Span BASE system work and other toll rehab work. The approved rehab and cantilever funds are estimated to be fully exhausted at the

1 of 4 Item 5b_Memo-YBITS2_FundReq_08Sep16-final.docx

Memorandum

completion of this work. The additional funding allocation of $9,300,000 is being requested to fund identified costs on the YBITS (Toll Seismic) portion of the work. As contained in the 2016 Q2 Quarterly Report, the budget and forecast cost for YBITS 2 is $92.4 million and $118.3 million respectively. This $9.3 million request will bring the YBITS 2 current approved budget to $101.4 million. The table below is a summary the current funding status and projected shortfall of $6.7 million for the YBITS 2 contract:

Current Paid Anticipated Approved Current Authorized to Date Final Estimated

TBPOC Budget Allotment Cost Incl. SFM Cost Shortfall Contract Items (All work)

$86,086,656 $86,086,656 $76,697,840 $86,086,656 $0

Supp. Funds/Contingency

$71,359,044 $64,008,301 $56,431,711 $78,043,721 $6,684,677

SFM $3,881,300 $2,869,481 $2,869,481 $3,881,300 $0 BATA Rehab $12,300,000 $8,556,211 $4,970,744 $12,300,000 $0 Totals $ 173,660,000 $173,627,000 $161,520,649 $140,969,776 $180,311,677 $6,684,677

The values in the table above include an anticipated cost savings of $3 million from deleting the Southgate road scope but do not include the transfer of any savings from the approved budget. In addition, the contingency fund needs to be replenished to provide for unanticipated changes as well as expected risks on the ECS wall. Therefore an amount equal to 10% of the remaining $26 million of work (item and CCO work) is being requested to replenish the contingency fund ($2.6 million). The Construction management team is requesting additional funding of $9,300,000.

BACKGROUND OF CHANGES TO YBITS 2 CONTRACT The project has 152 executed change orders:

138 change orders less than $1 million for a total of $31.7 million 14 TBPOC approved change orders for a total of $42.3 million

The project has 34 identified additional change orders to be funded from the YBITS budget:


Memorandum

29 pending change orders for a total of $12.0 million, 3 of which have received TBPOC approval. 5 anticipating change orders for an estimated total of $2.0 million with one anticipated TBPOC approval needed.

Identified and anticipated change order causes include but are not limited to:

SWPPP requirements and revisions Bike path adjustments US Coast Guard Base buried objects and utility modifications US Coast Guard Base modifications Southgate road revisions ECS revisions/adjustments/risk Additional funds for shuttle services for Muni shuttle Utility relocations Security issues Material disposal, excess and hazardous Signage requirements and changes Retaining wall conflicts and revisions (various walls) Permit requirements Edge beam adjustment/modifications/resolutions Electrical rehab/conflict resolutions

Of the $14 million of identified additional change orders, $7.3 million will be funded by the remaining contract contingency funds. This supplemental fund request of $9.3 million will fund the additional $6.7 needed to cover the identified changes as well as replenish the contingency fund. The $9,300,000 in funding is required as remaining contract and identified changed are required under permits and agreements such as USCG and BCDC that are Toll Bridge Program obligations. POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT COSTS

The project Risk Management Team has identified 17 other potential risks and has detailed them in the YBITS 2 project Risk Register. The total Risk Management Cost (50% probable) associated with these risks resulted in a forecast cost of $118.3 million in Q2-2016 and was included in the Q2-2016 Budget Balance Bar (BBB) analyses. The project team is not requesting funding to cover these additional potential costs ($118.3 million minus $101.7 million requested here) at this time and a future Supplemental Funds Request may be required if these risks are realized going forward.

The largest remaining known risks are:

Coordination Issues on the Island ………………….…… $1.8 million MEP Systems CCO………………………………………… $1.7 million Issues with Slopes …………………………………….…… $1.4 million


Memorandum

Delay Costs …………………………………………………. $1.2 million SWPPP Costs ……………………………………………….. $1.1 million Hazardous Materials ………………………………………. $1.1 million

Recommendation: Approval of this $9.3 million additional funding request for YBITS2 to allow completion of the remaining work without delay. Attachment: N/A


Memorandum



FR: Brian Maroney, SFOBB Project Chief Bridge Engineer, Caltrans/ Stefan Galvez, Chief, District 4 Office of Environmental Analysis, Caltrans

RE: Agenda No. – 6 Item – Old East Span Demolition - CMGC Contract Permits Update

Recommendation: For Information Discussion: The Department will present the status of the following permits related to the Marine Foundation Removal of Piers E4-E18:

United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS): • Memorandum of “no effect” for the federally protected California least tern finalized and

filed on August 26, 2016. No agency action is required. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS): • The Department submitted a Biological Assessment to NMFS on March 31, 2016 for the

implosions of Piers E4-E18. • NMFS Biological Opinion was issued on August 26, 2016. Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB): • The Department submitted a project SWPPP to the RWQCB on May 16, 2016 for mechanical

dismantling and implosions of Piers E4 and E5. • RWQCB issued SWPPP acceptance on June 21, 2016.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW): • The Department submitted a request for a major amendment to Incidental Take Permit No.

2081-2001-021-03 (ITP) on April 8, 2016. • CDFW ITP was issued on August 16, 2016 and fully executed on August 17, 2016. Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC): Pre-blasting Activities: • BCDC request for Material Amendment No. 40 to BCDC Permit No. 2001.008 (formerly 8-01)

was submitted on April 4, 2016. Amendment No. 40. covers pre-blasting activities (pier cap dismantling, BAS deployment, pre-blast tests) for Piers E4 through E18.

• BCDC Amendment No. 40 was issued on June 21, 2016 and fully executed on June 23, 2016.

1 of 2 Item 6_Memo-MarineFound_08Sep16-final.docx

Memorandum

Blasting Activities: • BCDC request for Material Amendment No. 41 to BCDC Permit No. 2001.008 (formerly 8-01)

was submitted on May 21, 2016. Amendment No. 41 covers all blasting related activities. • The BCDC Commission Hearing plus vote for the implosion amendment occurred on August

18, 2016. BCDC unanimously approved the project 16-0. • BCDC Amendment No. 41 is anticipated to be issued by September 2, 2016.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Marine Mammals: • Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA) application for behavioral impacts to marine

mammals was submitted to NOAA on March 10, 2016. • IHA was posted on the Federal Register on July 23, 2016 for a 30-day public review period.

The public review period ended on August 24, 2016. Comments were addressed as they were received and no further action is required on the Department’s part.

• The NOAA IHA anticipated target date is mid-September 2016.

United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE): Pre-blasting Activities: • USACE Letter of Modification (LOM ) for pre-blast activities was submitted on April 4, 2016. • USACE LOM for pre-blast activities was issued on June 27, 2016.

Blasting Activities: • USACE LOM for implosion of piers E4-E18 was submitted on April 29, 2016. • Target date for issuance of LOM by USACE is September 2, 2016.

Stakeholder Outreach: • The Department conducted an environmental stakeholders outreach on June 8, 2016 with

representatives from several environmental organizations, including Golden Gate Audubon Society, Sierra Club, the Marine Mammal Center, San Francisco Bay Keeper, and regulatory agencies, for the upcoming Marine Foundation Removal contract.

Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) Revalidation: • The Department is currently preparing a revalidation of the SFOBB FEIS. • Anticipated completion is September 2, 2016.

New Requirements

• No compensatory mitigation has been required by regulatory agencies.

2 of 2 Item 6_Memo-MarineFound_08Sep16-final.docx

Memorandum



FR: Dan McElhinney, Chief Deputy District Director, Caltrans District 4/ Steven Whipple, SFOBB Principal Construction Manager , Caltrans

RE: Agenda No. – 7

Item – SAS Tower Anchor Rod Grouting Contract Update

Recommendation: Information Costs: N/A Schedule: N/A Discussion: At the May 12, 2016, TBPOC meeting the TBPOC approved $12 million in capital outlay and $3 million in capital outlay support for the SFOBB SAS T1 Tower Anchor Rods System Evaluation and Repair presented at the meeting based on the final expert team technical report posted at ftp://SAS_TAR_Report:[email protected]. Since then, design and quality contract documents including plans, specifications, estimates, and quantities have been completed to begin the director's order contract bidding process. With the SAS tower rod grouting a high priority for the project team, they worked through details of how to best do a new lump sum biddable director's order urgent contract with room for CCOs if needed similar to if it had multiple contract items. Specifications from the existing SAS project were updated to current Standard Specification quality including current specifications language, English measurement units to support bidder estimating work (previously in 1999 metric units), and incorporating CPM and LD specifications needed to support competitive bidding as well without delay. Bidding competition and timely contract award of a developed contract bid package was important during PMT review as opposed to providing a noncompetitive force account contract or change order to a selected contractor. This resulted in a biddable lump sum contract package with the benefits of a higher quality contract bid package and potential competition that may reduce risks during construction, reduce capital outlay costs, and capital support costs over that of the earlier estimate. The bid package (plans, specifications, and material handouts) is expected to be finalized by Thursday, September 8, 2016. The bidding process will begin the week of September 12th with invitations to bid sent to several prime contractors involved in similar work (no more than 4). The contractors will be invited to a two day technical outreach session led by the project's chief bridge engineer and supporting team. The

1 of 2 Item 7_Memo-TowerAnchorRod_08Sep16-final.docx

ftp://SAS_TAR_Report:[email protected]/

Memorandum

outreach session will include a presentation of the work to be performed as well as a field visit to the base of the T1 tower. Following the outreach, the contractors will be allowed a 3 day period to submit bidder inquiries with 3 days allotted for bidder inquiry responses. Contractors will then be allowed three days to finalize and submit their bid packages. Once received, the bid packages will be reviewed for completeness and the work will be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. The contract is currently estimated to have up to 270 working days to complete.

2 of 2 Item 7_Memo-TowerAnchorRod_08Sep16-final.docx

Memorandum

Recommendation: APPROVAL Cost Impacts: Based on the Second Quarter 2016 Risk Management Report, the current Program Capital Outlay Support (COS) budget is insufficient to complete all remaining work and needs supplemental funds to cover the FY 16-17 budget request. A supplemental funds request of $16 million for capital outlay support (COS), to be funded from the program contingency budget to complete the next three quarters of this fiscal year, is recommended for approval. Schedule Impacts: FY 16-17: None Program COS and FY 16-17 Budget Request: At the May 12, 2016 meeting, the TBPOC was presented a Fiscal Year (FY) 2016-17 support budget request of $28 million per developed staffing work plans for remaining East Span construction project contracts including risk reserves for work outlined (not including the previously approved budgets for the tower anchor rod grouting repair of $3 million COS and the cathodic protection investigation of $1 million COS). After a discussion, the TBPOC approved an initial first quarter supplemental COS budget of $6 million for the first quarter of FY 16/17 and directed further review of the work plan and provide a reduced supplemental request from $28 million to under $22 million at the next meeting. This $6 million amount approved was within the overall TBPOC approved COS program budget and did not require a portion of the remaining Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program (TBSRP) contingency funding. For the first quarter, again the project team made significant staffing shifts to help continue the downward trend since January 2015 focusing on minimizing resources needed to get the job done. As a result, based on the July 2016 expenditure data available in mid-August showing that approximately $1.6 million COS was expended in the month of July, the first quarter COS expenditure projection is under the $6 million



FR: Dan McElhinney, Caltrans Chief Deputy District Director, District 4 Doanh Nguyen, Deputy Director Program/Project Management, Caltrans D4

RE: Agenda No. - 8

Item- Program Budget/Risks Update for FY 16-17 (Capital Outlay/Capital Outlay Support/Risk Management)

1 of 4 Item 8_Memo-ProgramBudget_08Sep16-Final.docx

Memorandum

budget. To complete the fiscal year COS budget estimate for this request, staffing and A&E resources were evaluated by each technical manager, each consultant contract manager, and the project chief bridge engineer for remaining tasks for each contract and minimal support activities needed to provide a key staff only through the fiscal year. Assumptions in this budget request include no contingency nor risk reserve for potential scope or schedule changes, which if necessary would be presented to TBPOC as separate supplemental budget requests. A supplemental funds request of $16 million for capital outlay support (COS), to be funded from the program contingency budget to complete the next three quarters of this fiscal year, is recommended for approval. The project team has reviewed each construction contract for workload and support estimates through June 2017, evaluated each remaining major tasks, assessed the need of each individual team member and minimum hours needed for those tasks, and shifted what resources can be balanced between state staff and A&E consultants to help minimize expenditures while achieving the work with quality. Approval by October 2016 would allow proper staffing levels to support all planned work to proceed on schedule. Timely decision on the supplemental COS budget for the remainder of FY 16-17 will help avoid late budget adjustment of staffing levels and A&E contract task orders while lowering risks to extend delivery schedules of remaining construction contracts. Significant management and project team efforts are continuing to help manage risks, A&E contract budgets and staffing levels each month to complete the fiscal year within budget. FY 15-16 efforts successfully achieved this action plan with good results reducing nearly 50% the monthly COS costs from $3.8 million in January 2015 to under $2 million a month projected to help stay under budget:

Table 1 - FY 2015-16 COS Budget and Expenditures

($ in millions)

Project FY 2015-16 COS Budget

FY 2015-16 COS Expenditures

Variance*

SFOBB East Span $24.59 $24.46 -$0.13 Dumbarton Bridge $0.35 $0.34 -$0.01

TBSRP Total $24.94 $24.80 -$0.14 *FY Allocation is applied to all work completed only within the FY regardless of invoice date, and any variance in cost/savings is TBSRP funded.

FY 2016-17 COS Budget to Date and No Reserve Assumptions This supplemental funds request will finalize an estimated total budget of $26.0 million necessary to continue carry-over work from FY 15-16 and undertake the new work in FY 16-17. The TBPOC has previously approved $6 million COS for contract work this quarter, and $3 million for grouting operations, and $1 million for cathodic corrosion protection investigation work for this fiscal year. For the second quarter of this FY 16-17, it is estimated that an average of $1.8 million is needed per


Memorandum month for contract work for a second quarter total estimate of $5.4 million COS requested (not including grouting and cathodic work outlined above). Note that the assumptions in the budget request include no contingency nor risk reserve for potential scope or schedule changes, which if necessary would be presented to TBPOC as separate supplemental budget requests. Carry-over Construction Work

• YBITS2 • 504/288 Demo, Ramp and Bike Path • Dumbarton Bridge Access Road

New Work

• Piers E4-E18 Demolition • Piers E2 and E19-E22 Demolition/Retention Permitting • SAS: Anchor Rod Grout Repair, Cathodic Protection, Archive and Close-out

Risks beyond this request include costs or schedule impacts related to anchor rods grout repair bid results, SAS claim/arbitration costs, YBITS2 construction delays, marine foundation permitting, bridgehead design/installation, as-built/archiving, potential salary/benefits increase, new expert/peer reviews recommendations, or new TBPOC/PMT requests. Risk cost estimates range from $2 million to $15 million. Below is a summary of the FY 16-17 COS Supplemental Request and Approved COS to Date:

Table 2 - FY 2016-17 COS Allocation Request ($ in millions)

TBSRP Forecast at Completion The current COS budget, for the program as well as at the East Span level, is not sufficient to cover the FY 16-17 COS budget request, nor to complete the program through FY 2020/21. A budget change is necessary since the remaining budget will be exhausted in the first quarter of FY 16-17. Based on the Q2 2016 analysis, the budget variance to complete the TBSRP is estimated to be $83 million for the SFOBB East Span, or $81 million for the entire TBSRP (including savings forecast).

Project FY 2016-17 COS Request

Previously Approved

Notes

SFOBB East Span $15.9M $6M Request for 10/1/16 through 6/30/2017

SAS Grouting - $3M Approved May 2016 Cathodic Protection - $1M Approved May 2016 Dumbarton Bridge $0.1M - - TBSRP FY 16-17 Total $16M $10M Total $26M


Memorandum

Table 3 – Program Budget, Expenditure and Forecast ($ in millions)

Project TBPOC

Approved Budget

(a)

Expenditures May 2016

(b)

COS Forecast Q1 2016

(c)

Remaining Budget

May 2016 (a – b)

Budget Variance*

(a – c)

SFOBB East Span

$1,311.5 $1297.0 $1,394.2 $14.5 -$82.7

TBSRP $1,907.8 $1,885.1 $1,989.2 $22.7 -$81.4

NOTE: By Oct 1, 2016, only about $6 million will be available in the current approved COS budget for the SFOBB East Span with $67.7 million in Program Contingency (Q2 2016 report).

Q2 2016 Risk Management Report Update The San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge Risk Management Coordinator will present a summary of the Q2 2016 Risk Management Report at the TBPOC meeting. The presentation will focus mainly on Q2 2016 cost risk results, risk response actions and a look ahead to Q3 2016 risk management developments. Attachments:

1. TBSRP CO and COS Cash Flow for East Span Project and Schedule (June 2016) 2. SFOBB East Span Projects FY 16/17 COS Budget Action Plan (August 2016) 3. SFOBB COS Expenditure from January 2015 thru August 2016 (PENDING)


1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Construction Support Project Support

CO Forecast ($in millions) 160 135 55 45 45Capital ($ in millions) 3.5 7.1 4.5 8.0 7.8 8.4 39.7 318.5 351.0 312.8 347.2 464.2 539.5 544.8 441.3 522.1 253.9 238.8 261.5 97.2 73.6

0.0

60.0

120.0

180.0

240.0

300.0

360.0

420.0

480.0

540.0

600.0Capital ($ in millions)

CO Forecast ($in millions)

COS Forecast ($ in millions) $26.2 $24.0 $20.0 $12.9 $10.0 $3.0COS ($ in millions) $5.1 $12.1 $21.2 $46.3 $39.5 $36.1 $29.9 $47.7 $69.8 $58.0 $63.8 $75.8 $109.3 $118.1 $119.5 $107.6 $101.7 $81.2 $82.4 $44.1 $24.4

$0.0

$20.0

$40.0

$60.0

$80.0

$100.0

$120.0

$140.0

$160.0

$180.0

$200.0COS ($ in millions)

COS Forecast ($ in millions)

Expenditure thru June 2016CO and COS Cash Flow for East Span Projects

Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program

Project

East Bay Replacement

0120F, SAS-Superstructure0120M, OTD Eastbound0120T, YBITS2-Cant. dismant.01350, YBITS3 Landscaping01352, Superstructure Dism.01354, Pier 3 Removal Demo.01357, Pier E4-E18.01358, Pier E2, E19-E22.

Completed Projects

1/186/20

11/14 5/21


0.0

60.0

120.0

180.0

240.0

300.0

360.0

420.0

480.0

540.0




$0.0

$20.0

$40.0

$60.0

$80.0

$100.0

$120.0

$140.0

$160.0

$180.0



Date: 09/01/2016

CAPITAL Current Approved Budget: $5,163M Forecast at Completion: $5,275M Expenditure thru June 2016: $4,860M

Notes: 1) CO and COS forecasts are based on 2nd QTR 2016 Financial and Risk Management Reports. 2) Forecasts include 2nd QTR 2016 risk of $112.5M CO, and $82.7.0M COS. 3) FY 15/16 COS expenditures include A&E expenditures from FY 14/15.

SUPPORTCurrent Approved Budget: $1,311.5M Forecast at Completion: $1,394.2MExpenditure thru June 2016: $1,300.3M

KWang

Text Box

Attachment 1: Item 8 September 8, 2016

SFOBB East Span Projects FY 16/17 COS Proposed Budget Action Plan

DRAFT‐9/2/2016

Work Description FTEProposed Budget Dlrs (k)

Work Description Division Contract VendorScope of Services

Task Manager

Proposed Budget Dlrs (k)

CONST Pier 7 Const ‐ D04 12.0 $3,416 ENV 04A4712 AECOM Env Stefan G. $1,970Pier 7 Const ‐ D59 10.6 $2,982 04A4426 BROWN AND CALDWELL Env Hardeep T. $1,784CONST 2.2 $549 04A3970 SF Bay Conser. & Dev. Comm Env Stefan G. $125

CONST Total 24.8 $6,947 04A4312 WRECO Env Hardeep T. $30TOLL BR DGN TOLL BR DGN 3.4 $1,150 04A4506 WATER BOARD Env Hardeep T. $125TOLL BR DGN Total 3.4 $1,150 04A4535 IBR Env Stefan G. $200Dist 4 Support DESIGN 0.6 $138 DESIGN 04.0135CM Kiewit/Manson JV CM/GC Chris T. $235

MGMT 3.1 $902 04A0148 PB AMERICAS INC Design John U. $800ENV 3.2 $812 59A0040 TY LIN M/N JV Design Hasan E. $2,990EXT_AFFAIRS 0.5 $101 METS 04A4542 ALTAVISTA METS Keith H. $700ROW 1.3 $322 GEO 04A4534 EMI Geotech Eng Saba M. $900TOLL BR MGMT 0.8 $276 CONST 04A3357 Sched/Claims Bill C. $250TRAFFIC OPER 0.1 $29 04A4611 Claims Deanna V. $240ADMIN 0.1 $10 MGMT 04A4265 CALTROP ENG. Risk Risk Mgmt Patrick T. $150MAINT 0.0 $6 04A2968 HNTB Mgmt Dan M. $220

Dist 4 Support Total 9.6 $2,596 CURRENT & UPCOMING CONTRACTS Total $10,719ENGR SVCS Support ENGR SVCS DGN 0.9 $224 DESIGN 59A0040 TY LIN M/N JV Design Hasan E. $400

ENGR SVCS METS/GEO 2.2 $485 METS 04A4542 ALTAVISTA METS Keith H. $1,100ENGR SVCS MGMT 0.2 $67 RODS/GROUT REPAIR Total $1,500ENGR SVCS OE 0.1 $38 CATHODIC PROTECTION DESIGN 59A0040 TY LIN M/N JV Design Hasan E. $866ENGR SVCS POLICY 0.0 $3 CATHODIC PROTECTION Total $866

ENGR SVCS Support Total 3.4 $817 Grand Total $13,085CURRENT & UPCOMING CONTRACTS Total 41.3 $11,510

CONST Pier 7 Const ‐ D04 2.5 $710Pier 7 Const ‐ D59 1.0 $282

CONST Total 3.5 $992TOLL BR DGN TOLL BR DGN 0.8 $266TOLL BR DGN Total 0.8 $266Dist 4 Support EXT_AFFAIRS 0.1 $11

TOLL BR MGMT 0.1 $42Dist 4 Support Total 0.2 $53ENGR SVCS Support ENGR SVCS METS/GEO 0.8 $172

ENGR SVCS MGMT 0.1 $17ENGR SVCS Support Total 0.8 $188

RODS/GROUT REPAIR Total 5.3 $1,500TOLL BR DGN TOLL BR DGN 0.4 $134

CATHODIC PROTECTION Total 0.4 $134Grand Total 47.0 $13,144

RODS/GROUT REPAIR

CATHODIC PROTECTION

RODS/GROUT REPAIR

Table 1 ‐ State Staff Plan Detail ($ in thousands) Table 2 ‐ A&E Contracts Plan Detail ($ in thousands)

Division

CH2M HILL

CURRENT & UPCOMING CONTRACTS


Proposed_Budget Action Plan 26.2M_090216.xlsx

KWang

Text Box


KWang

Text Box

Additional Notes*: 1. Assumptions in this COS Budget Action Plan include no contingency or risk reserve for scope or schedule changes at this time, as these changes will only be presented as separate future budget requests if unmitigated risks, scope or schedule changes occur. 2. "Others" include: Dumbarton Public Access, YBI Landscape, YBITS 1 and West Approach Landscaping. 3. COS savings within contracts listed above will be shifted to other contracts listed above if needed. 4. A&E Budgets listed were developed in task order discussions to balance workload, expertise, and cost effectiveness within budgets shown.

KWang

Text Box

Action Notes: 1. Finalize task orders with A&E firms to deliver scope of services within budget for each contract 2. Revise all task orders to be within the budget of each contract and to end on June 30, 2017

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Construction Support Project Support


0.0

60.0

120.0

180.0

240.0

300.0

360.0

420.0

480.0

540.0




$0.0

$20.0

$40.0

$60.0

$80.0

$100.0

$120.0

$140.0

$160.0

$180.0



Expenditure thru June 2016CO and COS Cash Flow for East Span Projects

Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program

Project

East Bay Replacement

0120F, SAS-Superstructure0120M, OTD Eastbound0120T, YBITS2-Cant. dismant.01350, YBITS3 Landscaping01352, Superstructure Dism.01354, Pier 3 Removal Demo.01357, Pier E4-E18.01358, Pier E2, E19-E22.

Completed Projects

1/186/20

11/14 5/21


0.0

60.0

120.0

180.0

240.0

300.0

360.0

420.0

480.0

540.0




$0.0

$20.0

$40.0

$60.0

$80.0

$100.0

$120.0

$140.0

$160.0

$180.0



Date: 09/01/2016

CAPITAL Current Approved Budget: $5,163M Forecast at Completion: $5,275M Expenditure thru June 2016: $4,860M

Notes: 1) CO and COS forecasts are based on 2nd QTR 2016 Financial and Risk Management Reports. 2) Forecasts include 2nd QTR 2016 risk of $112.5M CO, and $82.7.0M COS. 3) FY 15/16 COS expenditures include A&E expenditures from FY 14/15.

SUPPORTCurrent Approved Budget: $1,311.5M Forecast at Completion: $1,394.2MExpenditure thru June 2016: $1,300.3M

KWang

Text Box


SFOBB East Span Projects FY 16/17 COS Proposed Budget Action Plan

DRAFT‐9/2/2016

Work Description FTEProposed Budget Dlrs (k)

Work Description Division Contract VendorScope of Services

Task Manager

Proposed Budget Dlrs (k)

CONST Pier 7 Const ‐ D04 12.0 $3,416 ENV 04A4712 AECOM Env Stefan G. $1,970Pier 7 Const ‐ D59 10.6 $2,982 04A4426 BROWN AND CALDWELL Env Hardeep T. $1,784CONST 2.2 $549 04A3970 SF Bay Conser. & Dev. Comm Env Stefan G. $125

CONST Total 24.8 $6,947 04A4312 WRECO Env Hardeep T. $30TOLL BR DGN TOLL BR DGN 3.4 $1,150 04A4506 WATER BOARD Env Hardeep T. $125TOLL BR DGN Total 3.4 $1,150 04A4535 IBR Env Stefan G. $200Dist 4 Support DESIGN 0.6 $138 DESIGN 04.0135CM Kiewit/Manson JV CM/GC Chris T. $235

MGMT 3.1 $902 04A0148 PB AMERICAS INC Design John U. $800ENV 3.2 $812 59A0040 TY LIN M/N JV Design Hasan E. $2,990EXT_AFFAIRS 0.5 $101 METS 04A4542 ALTAVISTA METS Keith H. $700ROW 1.3 $322 GEO 04A4534 EMI Geotech Eng Saba M. $900TOLL BR MGMT 0.8 $276 CONST 04A3357 Sched/Claims Bill C. $250TRAFFIC OPER 0.1 $29 04A4611 Claims Deanna V. $240ADMIN 0.1 $10 MGMT 04A4265 CALTROP ENG. Risk Risk Mgmt Patrick T. $150MAINT 0.0 $6 04A2968 HNTB Mgmt Dan M. $220

Dist 4 Support Total 9.6 $2,596 CURRENT & UPCOMING CONTRACTS Total $10,719ENGR SVCS Support ENGR SVCS DGN 0.9 $224 DESIGN 59A0040 TY LIN M/N JV Design Hasan E. $400

ENGR SVCS METS/GEO 2.2 $485 METS 04A4542 ALTAVISTA METS Keith H. $1,100ENGR SVCS MGMT 0.2 $67 RODS/GROUT REPAIR Total $1,500ENGR SVCS OE 0.1 $38 CATHODIC PROTECTION DESIGN 59A0040 TY LIN M/N JV Design Hasan E. $866ENGR SVCS POLICY 0.0 $3 CATHODIC PROTECTION Total $866

ENGR SVCS Support Total 3.4 $817 Grand Total $13,085CURRENT & UPCOMING CONTRACTS Total 41.3 $11,510

CONST Pier 7 Const ‐ D04 2.5 $710Pier 7 Const ‐ D59 1.0 $282

CONST Total 3.5 $992TOLL BR DGN TOLL BR DGN 0.8 $266TOLL BR DGN Total 0.8 $266Dist 4 Support EXT_AFFAIRS 0.1 $11

TOLL BR MGMT 0.1 $42Dist 4 Support Total 0.2 $53ENGR SVCS Support ENGR SVCS METS/GEO 0.8 $172

ENGR SVCS MGMT 0.1 $17ENGR SVCS Support Total 0.8 $188

RODS/GROUT REPAIR Total 5.3 $1,500TOLL BR DGN TOLL BR DGN 0.4 $134

CATHODIC PROTECTION Total 0.4 $134Grand Total 47.0 $13,144

RODS/GROUT REPAIR

CATHODIC PROTECTION

RODS/GROUT REPAIR

Table 1 ‐ State Staff Plan Detail ($ in thousands) Table 2 ‐ A&E Contracts Plan Detail ($ in thousands)

Division

CH2M HILL



Proposed_Budget Action Plan 26.2M_090216.xlsx

KWang

Text Box


KWang

Text Box

Additional Notes*: 1. Assumptions in this COS Budget Action Plan include no contingency or risk reserve for scope or schedule changes at this time, as these changes will only be presented as separate future budget requests if unmitigated risks, scope or schedule changes occur. 2. "Others" include: Dumbarton Public Access, YBI Landscape, YBITS 1 and West Approach Landscaping. 3. COS savings within contracts listed above will be shifted to other contracts listed above if needed. 4. A&E Budgets listed were developed in task order discussions to balance workload, expertise, and cost effectiveness within budgets shown.

KWang

Text Box

Action Notes: 1. Finalize task orders with A&E firms to deliver scope of services within budget for each contract 2. Revise all task orders to be within the budget of each contract and to end on June 30, 2017

Memorandum



FR: Dan McElhinney, Chief Deputy District Director, Caltrans District 4

RE: Agenda No. – 9 Item – TBPOC Operation Procedures Under Bagley Keene

Recommendation: Approval Discussion: The TBPOC approved on April 19, 2016 by a vote of 3-0 to ask the Attorney General to appoint a member of her office to represent and advise the TBPOC on the Bagley Keene Act. Recently the Attorney General’s Office has agreed to represent the Toll Bridge Oversight Committee to provide procedural advice on open meeting laws. The anticipated budget for this representation is $60,000.00. Caltrans, CTC and BATA will share equally in the cost of the representation. Payment will be made by Caltrans, and CTC and BATA will reimburse Caltrans for their equal shares. It is recommended the TBPOC approve the Attorney General as representation and approve the budget as outlined here.

1 of 1 Item 9_Memo-TBPOC_OperatingProc_08Sep16-final.docx

a september 8, 2016 - bay bridge...

Documents