a review of plant virus disease in peninsular … · penyakit merah virus disease of rice is by far...
TRANSCRIPT
12. A REVIEW OF PLANT VIRUS DISEASE IN
PENINSULAR MALAYSIA
Ching Ang ONG* & Wen Poh TING**
Introduction
155
The importance of virus diseases was recognized of late. Hitherto no detailed studes of viruses have been carried out. Of the virus diseases reported in J\'Ialaysia, penyakit merah virus disease of rice is by far the most important, and has been studied by numerous workers (Ou et al., 1965; Ting and Paramsothy, 1970; Ting, 1971; Lim, 1972; Ting and Ong, 1974).
Most of the insect-borne viruses reported in Malaysia are transmitted aphids. This is followed by leafhoppers which is responsible for the transmission of 3 diseases of rice. The only white-fly transmitted virus disease is yellow vein-banding on Agerntum conyzoides. So far no vrus diseases have been reported to be transmitted thrips, mealybugs, mites, nematodes or fungi.
The characteristics of the virus diseases studied in Malaysia are discussed in this paper, including a disease reported to be caused by myeoplasma (Singh et al., 1970) viz .. paji jantan.
Cereals Rice Penyakit merah virus (PMV) disease of rice has been observed in Peninsular Malaysia for a long time (Coleman-Dascas. 1935). However, it ,vas not until 30 years later that the nature of the disease was established ( Ou et 19G5). Earlier workers attributed the disease to nutrient toxicity, nutrient deficiency ( Lockard, 1959 l, nematode and soil acidity. The symptom and host range of the vims are given in Table 1.
Penyakit merah vims is similar to tungro virus in the Philippines. Both viruses are transmitted by N ephotettix virescens and N. apicalis in a non-persistent manner (Ting and Paramsothy, 1970). However, the host range of Pl\'IV and that of tungro virus appear to differ. Echinochloa crusgalli, a symptomless carrier of tungro virus, was not infected by Pl\1V; the symptoms of Eleusine indica infected with penyakit merah and with tungro were found to be different ( Ting, 1971 L In addition, Oryza ridleyi. a susceptible host of tungro virus was shown to be not susceptible to PMV (Ting and Ong, 1974).
The incidence of PMV varies from locality to locality and appears to be cyclic. Yield losses of 69 to 92% have been recorded (Lim and Goh, 1969). The severity is dependent on the variety and time of infection.
The second virus disease reported on paddy is orange leaf. The disease is of limited economic importance, and is transmitted by the leafhopper, Recilia dorsalis (Singh, 1971). The only known host of the virus is 0. sati,:a. Symptoms of affected plants are described in Table 1.
Padi jantan has also been observed by farmers for a long time. The disease is of
* Plant Pathologist and ** Assistant Director, Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute, Malaysia
Tab
le 1
. C
hara
cter
isti
cs o
f vi
rus
dise
ases
in
Mal
aysi
a
,-=
,==
==
-,=
~--,I
--'-
,~--=
--
-"--
--~
--,-
--_
--~
-'-
--,,
, -
,, ,,
-=
-'v·
,,=
;-~,~
":"l
\for
ph'o
logy
==
=-
Nat
ura
l ,V
irus
:S
ympt
oms
Ho
st r
ang
e ]T
rans
mis
sion
I
1 r~
~-v
ei .0
1
'an
d p
hy
sica
l h
ost
__
__
_ ,
l ·
I _
__
_
re a
w
ns 11
ps
, pro
per
ties
P~
di
IPen
yak
it M
erah
]Y
ello
w t
o o
ran
ge
Ory
za s
ati
va,
!Gra
ft :
-M
in.A
cq.:
lO
n;-_
---
---
-
Pad
i
(Tu
ng
ro)
!dis
colo
rati
on o
f le
af;
0.
fatu
a,
!Sap
: -
Inb
.:
3h
rs.
,mo
ttli
ng
of
yo
un
g
Ech
inoc
hloa
col
onum
, IN
epho
tett
ix
Ret
.:
5d.
!leav
es,
stu
nti
ng
; E
leu
sin
e in
dica
:
vfre
scen
s M
in.I
noc.
: 30
m.
_! _
__
__
__
__
,red
ucti
on
in
till
erin
g.
IN. ni
gro
pic
tus
Ty
pe:
N
P
I '
I P
adi Ja
n ta
n
I Gen
eral
yel
low
ing,
,O
ryza
sa
tiva
!G
raft
; -
(Yel
low
dw
arf)
!s
ever
e st
un
tin
g;
\ S
ap :
-(M
yco
pla
sma)
!e
xces
sive
til
leri
ng
. N
. vi
rcsc
ens
I
Min
.Acq
.:
10m
. In
b.:
20
-,10
d.
Ret
.:
27d.
,M
in.I
noc.
: 10
m.
Pad
i lo
;~;g
e l
eaf
I
!Typ
e:
P _
_ _
Cit
rus
sp.
ITri
stez
a
Pas
sio
n f
ruit
!P
assi
on f
ruit
m
osa
ic
]Lea
ves
ora
ng
e !c
olou
red;
ro
lled
;
!slig
ht
stu
nti
ng
; d
eath
of
pla
nt.
i I Gen
eral
dec
line
; !d
ie-b
ack
of
twig
s 'a
nd
bra
nch
es·
'vei
n cl
eari
ng
; lr
orky
vei
ns;
ls
tem
pit
tin
g;
/yel
low
ing
of
foli
age.
I jC
hlor
otic
sp
ots
; :m
ott
lin
g;
curl
ing
; [p
ucke
ring
; d
isto
rtio
n;
!stu
nti
ng
;
!!so
rter
in
tern
od
es;
rin
g-s
po
ttin
g.
I
10
. I
ryza
sat
1va
i
Gra
ft:
-S
ap
: -
Rec
ilia
(I
na
zum
a)
I do
na,l
fa
: C
itru
s re
ticu
lata
(M
and
arin
G
raft
: +
o
ran
ge,
Lim
au C
hem
bol,
S
ap :
-L
imau
Ku
pas
, L
irn
au
To
xop
tera
K
op
ek),
C.
sine
nsis
(L
irn
au
citr
icid
ns
Po
ton
g),
C.
aura
nt,i
foli
a (L
irn
au N
ipis
), C
. g
ran
dis
( L
imau
Basa
r),
C.
mic
ro-
carp
a (L
imau
K
atsu
ri),
C
. h
istr
ix
(Lir
nau
Pu
rut,
L
irna
u K
edan
gsa
), C
. li
mon
(L
imau
S
usu
, L
irna
u K
apas
), C
. si
ving
lei
(Ku
mq
uat
), C
. au
ra,n
tiw
m
Min
.Acq
.:
3hrs
. In
b.:
l-
14
d.
Ret
.:
-M
in.I
noc.
: 3
hrs
. T
yp
e:
P
i ( S
tan
dar
d s
ou
r)
I ----•--~
--
/Pas
sijl
ora
edul
is,
P.
foet
icla
, i 1G
raft
: +
P
. la
urif
olia
, P
. li
gula
ris,
,S
ap :
+
IP. qu
aclr
angu
lari
s,
P.
pla
ty-1
Myz
us
pers
icae
, lo
ba,
P.
ma
lifo
nn
is,
Ap
his
gos
sypi
i,
P.
mac
roca
rpa,
P
. vi
tifo
lia
, A
. ca
cc'iv
ora
P.
mol
lisi
ma,
Cas
sia
occi
den-
tali
s, G
om
ph
ren
a g
lobo
sa,
,Che
nopo
diw
m a
ma
ran
tico
lor
!Typ
e:
NP
S
hap
e:
sph
ere
TIP
: 69
-70°
C
DE
P:
10-2
--10
-"
LIV
: 5-
6d.
e--
' en
C
h
Natu
ral
ho
st
Ch
illi
Cu
cum
ber
, P
eriw
ink
le,
Ban
ana
Let
tuce
!Vir
us
:Chi
lli
ven
ial
· m
ott
le
(Cu
cum
ber
mos
aic-
I • Let
tuce
mos
aic
i $y
mp
tom
s
:l\f
ottl
ing,
'v
ein
clea
rin
g,
vei
n b
and
ing
, :,
tunt
ing,
Ji
sto
rtio
n.
IN e
cro
tic
stre
ak
lbu
nch
y t
op
, '
,stu
nti
ng
Sev
ere
mo
ttli
ng
; d
ark
-gre
en b
list
er;
dis
tort
ion
; st
un
tin
g.
Vei
ncl
eari
ng
, ve
illb
andi
ng,
mo
ttli
ng
.
Tab
le 1
. (C
onti
nued
)
ran
ge
! .
. ::
Vir
u -v
ect r·
-·
iMor
phol
~gy
;T
rans
rmss
10n
i!re
latf
on
sht
s an
d p
h:.:s
1cal
___
--~
-,,
···-
----
·· --
~-~
pr
OJJ
!!rt
ies
avs
1<
no
n a
nn
uw
n,
C.
chin
en-
iGra
ft :
+
1Min
.Acq
.:
5s.
! Sh
ape:
fr
ute
scen
s, H
yosy
arn
us
,Sap
: +
:I
nb.:
-·
i
flex
uous
ro
d
Nic
an
dra
phy
salo
ides
, /A
ph
is g
ossy
pii,
IR
et.:
3
hrs
. fT
IP:
55--
G0°
C
ta.b
acum
'Du
tch
A'
;A.
era
cdo
ora
, t:
Win
.Ino
c.:
5s.
DE
P:
10
·'-1
0 '1
'Wh
ite
Bu
rley
', P
hys
ali
s !M
yz1r
n pe
rsic
ae,
iTyp
e:
NP
iL
IV:
7-S
d.
ffor
idan
a,
P.
min
ima
![
t. n
wid
is,
· ;I.
cit
rici
dus,
,A
. sp
ira,
ecol
a,,
'H.
seta
,ria
e
!v11
cope
rsic
wn
esci
lla
entu
m
IGra
ft :
+
' '
:sap
:+
[Cuc
nmis
sat
iovu
s { C
ucu
m
;ber
), C
ncur
bita
, pe
po
, (P
um
pk
in),
C
. 1na
;;:im
a / (
Squ
ash)
_, M
omor
dica
cha
r,'
1n
tm
(Bit
ter
cucu
mb
er),
/T
rich
osan
thes
an
qu.i
na
/ ( S
nak
e g
ou
rd),
Ben
inca
sa
ceri
fera
(T
on
g Q
ua,
!M
au
Qu
a),
Cro
tala
ria
1u
sara
moe
nsis
, Ca,
lopo
goni
urn
,nni
cuno
,ides
, C
hen
op
od
ium
,a
mar
anti
colo
r,
Go
mp
hre
na
'q
lobo
sa,
Vin
ca s
inen
sis
(Per
iwin
kle
), A
ma
ryll
is s
p.,
Mus
a, s
a,JY
ient
um
(Ban
an
a),
P
assi
/for
a ed
ulis
, A
.mar
a,n
)thu
s vi
ricl
is,
Cit
rnll
us
1vul,1
~ct'l
'is,
Co
mm
elin
a
inud
iflo
ra
amor
anti
colo
r,
gfob
osa,
l,a
atnc
a L
ath
yru
s o
do
ratn
s
I [Gra
ft:+
fS
ap: +
,M
yzus
per
sica
e,
1-ip
his
go
ssyp
ii,
A
crac
civo
ra
Riw
palo
siph
1Zm
m
aid·
is
--~
--~
-~
----~
----~
--~
--~
-----------
----
----
----
--~
i
M~
n.A
cq.:
30
s.
:Ino
.:
-]R
et.:
40
m.
iMin
.Ino
c.:
Ty
pe:
N
P
'TIP
: 6
0-G
2''C
!D
EP
: 10
-•-1
0 L
IV:
4-5d
.
i-'
tn
_..,
Natu
ral
ho
st
Brr
rnw
ica
rap
a,
Rad
ish
Gro
un
dn
ut
Lo
ng
bea
n
Orc
hid
s
Tab
le 1
. (C
onti
nued
)
! .
. 'V
iru
s-v
ecto
r S
ym
pto
ms
1Tra
nsm
1ss1
0n
.. la
t·
h"ps
,
__
__
__
__
__
__
_ I_
____
le
!O
DS
l.
-ls
ap: +
T
yp
e:
NP
-···-~
--
·--
Mot
tlin
g,
dis
tort
ion
, st
un
tin
g.
eno
po
aiu
m n
mn
ra,n
tico
lor,
ql
lino
n, B
rass
ica
shi
nens
iH,
B.
rap
a,
B.
ule
race
a
per
ui
rid-
is,
B.
alb
o-g
lab
rn,
B.
na
pu
s,
B.
oler
a<ie
a,
Go
m.p
hre
na
glo
bo1,
a ------· ---
--~
--·-
---
··---
---·
----
----
---·
·-·-
--
Gro
un
dn
ut
mo
saic
!
1Mot
tlin
g w
ith
pat
ches
lo
f d
ark
-gre
en;
chlo
roti
c sp
ots
an
d
rin
g s
po
ttin
g;
stu
nti
ng
.
Mot
tlin
g,
dis
tort
ion
, st
un
tin
g.
i '
iCym
bidi
um m
osa
ic [
Sun
ken
bla
ck n
ecro
sic
'[ (s
pots
on
un
der
!s
urf
ace
of
leav
es o
n
I !V
an
da
& D
end
rob
inm
'
ispp
. D
iam
on
d
I !s
po
ttin
g a
nd
ch
loro
tic
i
iAra
chis
h
ypo
ga
ea,
Cas
sia,
lo
ccfr
lent
alis
, G
lyci
ne
ma:
,;,
!Cll
lopo
gon1
um 1
mw
n11o
ides
'C
rota
lari
a
an
ag
yro
ides
, lS
tylo
san
thes
gm
cili
s,
'Pha
s!'{
ou.s
vu
lga
ris,
1c
heno
podi
u1n
wm
ara
nti
colo
r
:Vig
na
ses
quip
ed<
.dis
, i V
. si
nen
sis,
C
heno
podi
'ton
'.
amar
anti
colo
r,
C.
qu
ino
a,
C. ·
muc
unoi
des,
Gly
cin
e so
,ia,
I'·i
snm
sai
foum
., P
lwse
oln
8
,vu
lga
ris
;Sp
ato
glo
ttis
i'p
., V
on
da
sp.
, jD
endr
obhc
m s
p.,
Phl
aenu
p11i
8 is
p.,
Co
ttle
ya e
nids
o11,
fC
att
leya
sp
. (T
rue
Dep
th),
;C
assi
a o
ccid
enta
lis,
'C
hen
op
od
imn
am
ara
nii
colo
r,
:c. q
uin
oa
, Da
tu.r
a s
tro
mo
ni-
IA p
his
,go
ssyp
ii,
!Myz
us
per
sica
e,
IL. e
rysi
mi
' !Gra
ft:
'Sap
: "'1
jAp
his
go_
ssyJ
!ii,
1A.
crac
c1vo
7:a,
·M
yzu
s pe
rs1.
cac,
!R
hopa
losi
ph 1
1m
, m
a-id
is
iTos
opf.
era
· ci
tric
idu
s
Gra
ft:+
S
ap
:+
Seed
:+
Ap
his
go
ssyp
ii,
!A.
cra
ccfo
ora
, M
yzu
s p
ersi
cae,
iL.
erys
imi
Min
.Acq
.:
5s.
lnb
.:
-R
et.:
40
--,1
5m.
Min
.Ino
c.:
: N
P
,Ty
pe:
N
P
~~
--1
-
!spo
ts o
n S
pa
thu
glo
ttiB
\s
p.
clo
urb
reak
s.
nm
, G
om
ph
ren
a g
lolr
nsa
!Ch
eno
po
diu
m a
ma
ran
tico
lor,
!S
ap :
+
---·
Hyd
ran
gea
sp
p.
Mo
ttli
ng
, d
isto
rtio
n
,Cas
sfo,
u
ccid
enta
lis,
G
om
-lp
hre
na
glo
bosa
, N
icot
ia11
a lu
luti
no
sa,
,V.
tab
cwn
m,
l,V. ,
ran
thi
fi2
-fi5
°C
! IJ
J•;J
":
10 "
-10
' L
TV
: 40
-Ll8
hrs.
TIP
: D
EP
LIV
:
>--
' ()l
00
Tab
le 1
. (C
onti
nued
)
----
---.
. --
-==
==
==
=~
==
==
=-~
==
==
==
==
==
==
~=
==
==
==
==
==
==
N
t
I I
i !
ho
~tr
a
IVir
us
Sy
mp
tom
s IH
ost
ran
ge
!Tra
nsm
issi
on
Am
ary
llis
Tob
acco
, T
om
ato
, C
hill
i
Su
gar
can
e
Ag
era
tum
co
nyzo
ides
Juss
inea
li
nifo
lia,
Key
es:
I Dar
k
gre
en m
ott
les
I !T
obac
co m
osai
c I 1 S
ever
e m
ott
lin
g
lwit
h d
ark
-gre
en
1 isla
nd
s;
dis
tort
ion
an
d s
tun
tin
g
I i
:Su
gar
can
e m
osai
c S
catt
ered
elo
ng
ated
I
wh
itis
h s
trip
s.
I i I -
IYel
low
ve
in b
and
ing
--~
----
Min
.Acq
. In
b.
---
ivei
ns
app
eare
d a
s !y
ello
w b
and
s w
ith
n
orm
al g
reen
in
terv
ein
al a
reas
; th
ick
erin
g o
f v
ein
s an
d c
url
ing
\Sys
tem
ic y
ello
win
g I I I
iche
nopo
dium
an,
iara
ntic
olor
, /S
ap :
+
1 C,q
wi:
gl
obor
, N
. gl
u 'W
hit
,
Nic
oti
an
a
taba
curn
, G
raft
:+
N.
xan
thi,
N.
glut
inos
a,
Sap
:+
N.
rust
ica
, C
ap
sicu
m
Vec
tor:
-a
nn
uu
m,
Lyc
oper
sico
n es
cule
ntm
n,
Che
nopo
diur
n am
aran
tico
lor,
C
. qu
inoa
, G
om
ph
ren
a g
lobo
sa,
Pha
seoh
ls v
ulg
ari
s, V
ing
a
sine
nsis
, C
ucu,
mis
sa
tivu
s,
Da
tura
str
am
on
ium
, P
hys
ali
s fi
orid
ana,
P
. ·m
inim
a
Sa
cch
aru
m o
ffic
inar
wm
, I !G
raft
: -
Zea
-m
ays
'Gol
den
Ham
mer
' S
ap
:+
'Cin
ta',
So
rgh
um
bic
olor
I
'Rio
' 'A
tas'
I I
Ag
era
tum
con
yzoi
des
Gra
ft:+
S
ap
: -
Bem
isia
tab
aci
IIus
sict
ect
lin
if ol
ia
jGra
ft:
+
1S
ap:
-\B
eni
isia
tab
aci
NP
=
No
n-p
ersi
sten
t P
=
Pers
iste
nt
ivir
us-
vec
tor
Mo'
:rph
ofog
y ]r
elat
ions
hips
an
d p
hy
sica
l 1
!)r,c>
,p~1
--·t_
ie_s
'---~
-
---
Sh
ape:
ro
d
! I I I i i \Typ
e:
P
····~
-~---
------
·-·---
-----
--
----
----
-··-
---"
·---
-
Ret
. M
in.I
noc.
=M
inim
um
acq
uis
itio
n p
erio
d
=In
cub
atio
n p
erio
d i
n i
nse
ct v
ecto
r =
Ret
enti
on
per
iod
=
Min
imu
m
ino
cula
tio
n
or
test
fe
edin
g
per
iod
T
IP
=T
herm
al
inac
tiv
atio
n p
oin
t D
EP
=D
ilu
tio
n e
nd
po
int
LIV
=
Lo
ng
evit
y 1
:n vi
tro
I-'
c.n
<D
160
minor importance. The disease was found to be transmitted by N. vfrescens (Lim and Goh, 1968; Lim, Hi70). Recently mycoplasma like structure was observed in the phloem cells of padi jantan-infected plants (Singh et al., 1970). Similar structures have also been shown to be associated with yellow dwarf disease of rice in Japan and the Philippines.
Fruits Citrus Tristeza is widespread in all the citrus growing districts and all citrus varieties, with the possible exception of kumquat ( Citrits swing lei), are affected by the virus (Ting and Arasu, 1970). The disease is one of the main limiting factors in the production of citrus. The widespread distribution of the virus has been mainly attributed to the vegetative propagation of virus-infected planting materials. The aphid vector, Toxoptera citriciclus is commonly found on citrus. Several major citrus growing areas in Peninsular Malaysia have been abandoned as a result of the disease. Passion fruit Indigenous species of Passifiora e.g. P. f oetida have been frequently observed to be affected by mosaic. Similar symptoms have also been found on passionfruit vines (P. eclulis, f. fiavicarpa, introduced from Hawaii). Comparative studies of two isolates of the mosaic disease showed that while sharing many common characteristics and properties (Table 1), they can be readily differentiated using indicator plants and aphid vectors. Cassia occiclentalis is highly susceptible to the isolate ,vhich cannot be transmitted by Aphis craccivora and A. gossypii ( Ong and Ting, 1973 l. Results of studies indicated that it is likely that the two viruses are related. Field spread of the viruses is mainly affected through prunning operation as well as by aphids which transmit them in the non-persistent manner.
Vegetables lVIost of the vegetables commonly grown in the country belong to the family Cruci
ferae, Solanaceae, Cucurbitaceae, ancl. Legt,minosae. Vegetables grown have been fre-• quently observed to be affected by viruses. Chilli Field grown chilli plants have been found to be infected by a number of viruses. The most prevalent one is chilli veinal mottle virus, a member of the potyvirns or potato virus Y group. The host range, symptomatology and physical properties of the virus are presented in Table 1. AU the chilli varieties tested so far have been found to be highly susceptible. The virus is transmitted in the non-persistent manner alI the aphid species tested. Chilli plants infected a month after sowing can result in reduction as high as Polyethylene sheet coated with aluminum paint has been found to be effective in reducing disease incidence by repelling the aphid vectors 1975).
Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) has also been found to infect chilli. The same virus ,vas also found on tomato and brinjal. Comparative studies on some of the TMV isolates have shown the possible presence of strains or variants in Peninsular Tomato In addition to TMV, tomato plants have recently been reported to be infected
a virus which causes m .. ,~~-·,,. necrotic streak on the leaves and stems of infected plants (Ong, unpublished). The virus has been found to be readily graft and sap transmissible from diseased to healthy tomato plants. The following plant species have been found not to be susceptible to the virus:-Chenopoclium amaranticolor; C. guinoa, Capsicum a.nnuurn; Datura stramonium; Gom.phrena globosa; Hibiscus esculentus; Nfrotictna rustica; N. tabacwn; N. a:anthi; PhaBcolus ·vulgaris; Physalis floriclana; Solanuni melonyena; Vigna sinensis; and V. sesquipedaliB.
Detailed characterization of the virus is currently being carried out. Another virus reported on tomato, cucumber mosaic virus (ClVIV) ,vill be discussed in the following section.
161
Cucumber A number of the vegetables cultivated in the country belong to the family Cucurbitaceae. The major virus disease of cucurbits is ClVIV. The virus has also been found to infect banana (Musa spientum) and periwinkle (Ong, 1971). The properties of the virus are listed in Table 1. Lettuce The occurrence of lettuce mosaic vims on lettuce was first reported in 1973 (Ong). The virus is of minor importance and was probably introduced into the country through infected seeds. Turnip and Radish Brassica rapa and Raphanus sativw;; have been found to be naturally infected by a virus disease which causes mosaic symptoms on both hosts. The virus is readily transmitted by sap inoculation and aphids to other Brassicas, including Chinese cabbage and kai-lan (B. albo-glabra). The host range, symptomatology, physical properties and virus-vector relationship of the virus appear to he similar to those turnip mosaic virus ( Ong, unpublished).
Legumes Groundnut One of the most important leguminous crops grown in Peninsular Malaysia is groundnuts. Field gro,vn groundnuts are commonly observed to exhibit systemic mottling. Ting and co-workers (1972) sho,ved that the disease is caused by a virus, groundnut mosaic virus (GMV). The virus is considered to be one of the most widespread diseases of groundnut. The characteristics of the virus are listed in Table 1. It is evident that except for C. amaranticolor, the host range of GMV is mainly confined to the family Leguminosae. It is transmitted in a non-persistent manner by all ihe aphid species tested so far. The main vector being Aphis cracC'ivora. Longhean (Vigna sesguipedalis) Surveys carried out in some of the long bean farms have shown that most of the plants are infected with a mosaic disease caused by a virus (Ong, unpublished). The virus is readily graft and sap transmissible and has been found to be transmitted by all aphid species tested. Recently, the virus was found to be seed
studies have shown that the percentage of seed transmission can vary from 2-50% on time of infection.
Ornamentals Orchid Orchids are one of the most important group of ornamentals grown in the country. The various genera of orchids like 8pathoglottis sp., Vanda sp., Denclrobiurn sp., Phalaenopsis sp., and Cattleya sp. are often found to he infected with cymhidium mosaic virus (Ting and Ho, 1971). In a recent survey of vin,s diseases of orchids it was shown that _4rnchnis Oei cv. Red Ribbon; Aranthera James Storei; Aranda Wendy Scott cv. Greenfield, and Oncidiion Golden Shower cv. Caldwell are frequently infected with cymbidium mosaic virus and/or tobacco mosaic virus-orchid strain. Presently, much effort has been made to produce virus-free planting materials using tissue culture techniques. Hydrangea sp. Virus infected plants showed mottling and distortion of the leaf ( Ting, unpublished). The virus is sap transmissible and the host range of the virus is listed in Table 1. The virus is of limited importance. Others Amaryllis and perhvinkle have been found to be infected with virus diseases. The vin1s on Amaryllis may have been introduced into the country through infected bulbs. Periwinkle are often infected with CMV, and may play an important role in the epidemiology of ClVIV.
Miscellaneous Tobacco Tobacco mosaic virus which has been discussed in the previous section, is the most prevalent virus disease of tobacco. This disease is very widespread throughout
162
the country. The main properties of the virus are presented in Table 1. Sugarcane Planting materials from overseas were found to be infected with a virus. Leaves of infected cane show elongated systemic mottling. The virus is sap transmissible to monocotyledons like maize and sorghum. Attempts to transmit the virus using Rhopalosiphurn maidis and Hysterone1lra setariae, known aphid vectors of sugarcane mosaic virus, have so far been unsuccessful. Ageratum conyzoides Ageratum conyzoides is a common weed found throughout the lowlands in the country. The infected plants normally show yellow veinbanding symptom. Studies have shown that the virus Ageratum yellow veinbanding virus, can readily be transmitted through grafting but it is not sap transmissible. It is the first whitefly -transmitted plant virus recorded in the country. The host range of the virus is limited to A. conyzoides. Brinjal, chilli, cucumber, okra, tobacco and tomato are not susceptible to the virus. ( Ong, et al., 1976). Jussiaea linifolia Jussiaea l'inif olia is a common weed generally found in paddy areas. Symptoms somewhat resembling that of Ageratum yellow veinbanding virus have been observed on J. linifolia. The virus has been found to be transmissible through grafting. Attempts to transmit the virus by sap inoculation and insects have been unsuccessful.
Conclusion Studies on plant viruses carried out so far have shoivn that aphids are the most
important arthropod vectors and are usually associated with mosaic type diseases. All the aphid-borne viruses reported are of the non-persistent type. Most of the important virus diseases of rice on the other hand are transmitted by leafhoppers.
In spite of the relatively high temperature and humidity there is no evidence of masking of symptoms caused by viruses. Observations have indicated that virus diseases are equally important in the tropics as compared to temperate areas. The high temperatures also does not appear to affect the physical properties of the virus e.g. thermal inactivation point, dilution end point, etc.
Further studies need to be carried out in order to establish the true identity of some of the viruses. Frequently minor differences have been encountered while comparing virus diseases present in Malaysia with those reported in other countries. As a result this has caused some problems in establishing the relatedness of viruses occurring in Malaysia and those elsewhere. The problem is accentuated for viruses where antisera are not available. Comparative studies of viruses which appear to be closely related using standard techniques would be extremely useful.
References 1. COLEMAN-DASCAS, A. E. (1935). Rice experiments in Malaya, 1933-34. Malayan
Agricultural Journal 23, 10-40. 2. LIM, G. S. (1970). Transmission studies of yellow dwarf diseases in West Malaysia.
Malaysian Agricitltural Journal 47, 519-523. 3. --- (1972). Studies of penyakit merah disease of rice III. Factors contribtuing to
an epidemic in North Krian, Malaysia. Malaysian Agricultural Journal 48, 278-294. 4. LIM, G. S. & GOH, K. G. (1968). Leafhopper transmission of a virus disease of rice,
locally known as 'padi jantan' in Krian, Malaysia. Malaysian Agricultural Journal 46, 435-450.
5. ---, --- (1969). Screening of insecticides against Nephotettix spp. Malaysian Agricultural Journal 47, 77-100.
6. LOCKARD, R. G. (1959). Mineral nutrition of the rice plant in Malaya, with special reference to penyakit merah. Department of Agriculture Bulletin 108, Federation of Malaya.
7. ONG, C. A. (1971). Studies of cucumber mosaic virus in West Malaysia. B. Agric. Sc.
163
thesis, Fae. of Agric. University of Malaya. 76 pp. 8. (1973). Occurrence of lettuce mosaic virus in Malaysia. MA.RDI Research Bul-
letin 1, 10-14. !t --- (1975). Studies of a mosaic disease of chilli (Capsicicm annuinn L.) in Peninsular
Malaysia. M. Agric. Sc. thesis. Fae. of Agric. University of Malaya, 100 pp. 10. ONG, C. A. & TING, W. P. (1973). Two virus diseases of passion fruit (Passi/fora
edulis f. flavicarpa). MARDI Research Bulletin 1, 33-50. ll. ONG, C. A., TING, W. P. & LIM, Y. C. (1976). A whitefly-borne disease of A,geratum
conyzoides. (In press) 12. OU, S. H., RIVERA, C. T., NAVARATNAM, S. J. & GOH, K. G. (1965) Virus nature
of "penyakit merah" disease of rice in Malaysia. Plant Disease Reporter 49, 778-782. 13. SINGH, K. G. (1971). Transmission studies on orange leaf virus disease of rice in
Malaysia. Malaysian A.gricultural Journal 48, 122-132. 14. SINGH, K. G., SAITO, Y. & NASU, S. (1970). Mycoplasma-like structures in rice plant
infected with "padi jantan". Malaysian A.gricultural Journal 47, 333-337. 15. TING, W. P. (1971). Studies of penyakit merah disease of rice II. Host range of the
virus. Malaysian Agricultural Journal 48, 10-12. 16. TING, W. P. & ARASU, N. T. (1970). A survey of Tristeza virus on citrus in West
Malaysia. Malaysian A.gricultural Journal 47, 299-304. 17. TING, W. P., GEH, S. L. & LIM, Y. C. (1972). Studies on groundnut mosaic virus of
Arachis hypogaea L. in West Malaysia. Experimental Agriculture 8, 355-368. 18. TING, W. P. & HO, T. H. (1971). Disease and pests of orchids. Ministry of Agriculture
and Co-operatives, West Malaysia. 19 pp. 19. TING, W. P. & ONG, C. A. (1974). Studies of penyakit merah disease of rice IV. Addi
tional hosts of the virus and its vector. Malysian Agricultural Journal 49, 269-274. 20. TING, W. P. & PARAMSOTHY, S. (1970). Studies of penyakit rnerah disease of rice L
Virus-vector interaction. Malaysian Agricultural Journal 48, 10-12.
Discussion T. Soelaeman, Indonesia: (1) Yellow vein banding of Ageratum is found every
where Indonesia, but studies on this disease is just in the initial stage at Bandung or Bogor. Do you know other hosts than Agera.tu.m?
(2) How about Stachytarpheta yellows in Malaysia? Is this disease also present in Malaysia ?
Answer: (1) So far as our tests were concerned, the virus appears to infect Ageratum conyzoides only, however in our further studies, it is possible that other host may be found.
(2) We are not familiar with this virus in Malaysia. E. W. Kitajima, Brazil: Do you plant corn in Malaysia? If so, are there any
virus diseases on this crop? Answer: Corn is planted in Malaysia mainly for human consumption. Attempts
to grow corn have not developed to the scale where virus diseases are observed. I would not be surprised if viruses occur on maize should large areas be planted to the crop.
M. D. Mishra, India: (1) It seems that you do not have tobacco leaf curl virus in your country. How about any other hosts which may be harbouring tobacco leafcurl virus as in the case of my country?
( 2 J You have mentioned about the use of tissue culture technique in orchid cultivation, especially for freeing your orchid cultivars from virus infestation. How far it is being used and what is the progress in its use?
Answer: (1) Tobacco leafcurl has been observed on tobacco in Malaysia. We do not have any information on the host range or other host plants which may harbour the virus.
(2) We have only recently started work on the use of tissue culture in combina-
164
tion with heat therapy to produce virus free planting material. Bioassay will be carried out with the material propagated by means of tissue culture technique.
D. A. Benigno, Philippines: (1) Do you have any studies on the strain of sugarcane mosaic virus'?
(2) Your slide of groundnut mosaic virus seems to be similar to the peanut mottle virus reported in other countries. Why don't you call it peanut mottle Yirns other than groundnut mosaic virus?
Answer: (1) No strain study is carried out at the moment on sugarcane mosaic virus.
(2) Groundnut mosaic virus in Malaysia is very similar to peanut mottle reported by Kuhn, except for minor differences in reaction on indicator plants. Since there is no complete agreement with viruses reported on peanut so far, we have decided to name it as groundnut mosaic virus.