Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 30 (2011) 1037 – 1042

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

1877-0428 © 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of the 2nd World Conference on Psychology, Counselling and Guidance.doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.202

Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 00 (2011) 000–000

www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia

WCPCG-2011

A review of approaches to teaching thinking: appropriate approach for Iran education system

Maryam Sedaghat a 1*, Soudeh Rahmani b

aPh.D. of educational psychology, Faculty Member of ACECR, Tehran, Iran bMSc of educational psychology, Member of Educational Science of ACECR, Tehran, 1937814653, Iran

Abstract

On the basis of theoretical and empirical evidences this paper aims to find the most appropriate approach to teaching thinking in Iran. Theoretical framework and the most important research findings of each approach, relevant educational programs and their strengths and weaknesses were studied through literature review. Approaches were identified on the literature according to cultural conditions and educational features include enrichment, infusion and thinking dispositions. By considering Iran’s educational system needs and situations, thinking dispositions approach seems as the most suitable approach and enculturation of thinking is the most appropriate method for teaching thinking especially in elementary schools. © 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Keywords: Teaching thinking approaches, enrichment, infusion, thinking disposition, enculturation of thinking.

1. Introduction

Twenty first century can be called as a century of tremendous changes in social, economical and cultural fields. Accordingly, the most important goal of education in this century should be nurture learners that are ready to face the changing society and complexity of information explosion period. Consequently, the development of high-level thinking has been considered as a national priority of learning, in many countries. Despite acknowledging the importance of thinking for students, several studies have reported the weaknesses in the high-level intellectual activities (Perkins, Jay, and Tishman, 1993a). Studies have shown poor intellectual performance of students in Iran is not scarce (shabani, 1374; yazdanpanah, 1385). International TIMSS (1995, 2003 and 2007) and PIRLS (2001, 2006) tests could be noted as the most important and reliable studies (Cited in TIMSS international press release website). It seems that considerable action has not been taken after 12 years from the first attendance of Iran in such testing and disclosure of students’ weaknesses in high-level intellectual activities, or these efforts were not effective. Likewise, Review of the few actions which have done to develop thinking and its functions indicate that these actions were scattered and using different theoretical perspectives.

Literature review showed various approaches to teaching thinking. Some of the most important approaches are: specifically designed programs for teaching thinking and infusion of thinking in the curriculum (Nisbet, 1990;

* Maryam Sedaghat. Tel.: +98-912-288-2820; fax: +98-21-88243710. E-mail address: msedaghat@icds.ir .

© 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of the 2nd World Conference on Psychology, Counselling and Guidance.

1038 Maryam Sedaghat and Soudeh Rahmani / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 30 (2011) 1037 – 1042 Maryam Sedaghat / Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 00 (2011) 000–000

2

McGuinness, 1999), enrichment and infusion (McGuinness, 2005) skills, dispositions and understanding (Harpaz, 2007), making thinking visible (Ritchhart, and Perkins, 2008) generic (Bolt-on), subject specific (Embedded) and infusion (Dewey and Bento, 2009).

Apart from different titles like as specifically designed programs and infusion (Nisbet, 1990; McGuinness, 1999), enrichment (McGuinness, 2005), Skills (Harpaz, 2007) and generic and subject specific (Dewey and Bento, 2009) which have been used by theorists, in fact they are side programs that designed separately to enrich curriculum and to help students for developing their thinking. Therefore consistent with McGuinness, this approach can be called enrichment.

Attention to motivational and emotional aspects of learning, especially learning thinking is an important issue that should not be neglected. Conceivably, lacks of attention to this important point endanger the effectiveness of any plan -whether in the form of specific programs of enrichment or in the form of infusion across the Curriculum. Hence, according to importance of motivational aspect in Eastern societies including Iran, adoption of approach that considers this aspect is essential. Therefore, considering a separate approach for thinking disposition that Harpaz (2007) mentioned it as a discrete approach and McGuinness (2005) mentioned it beneath of infusion approach, seems appropriate.

This paper with reviewing of the aforementioned approaches aims to provide a new division to teaching thinking approaches. So, approaches were identified on literature review by considering cultural conditions and educational features include enrichment, infusion and disposition. Moreover, to find the most appropriate approach to teaching thinking in Iran theoretical framework and the most important research findings of each approach, relevant educational programs were also discussed.

1.1. Enrichment approaches

Enrichment approach is generally derived from the cognitive theories. In this approach lessons are designed beforehand and are taught parallel with the existing curriculum to develop general thinking skills. Authors introduced and reviewed of three programs of this approach according to their reputation and widespread uses include instrumental enrichment (IE), cognitive acceleration (CA) and philosophy for children (P4C).

Feuerstein instrumental enrichment (FIE) is one of the most famous thinking skills training programs all over the world which was developed 80 years ago. FIE was developed to modify the false idea of fixed intelligence ability and psychometric approaches to assessment and in response to particular educational needs (Kozulin, 1998). The twin pillars of IE are the theory of cognitive modifiability and mediated learning experiences (McGuinness, 2005).

Cognitive acceleration is the most successful cognitive enhancement program (Adey and Shayer, 1994). This program draws on Piaget’s theory of cognitive development and Vygotsky’s principles of the social construction of knowledge. This aims to accelerate children’s cognition to the next developmental stage through generation of cognitive conflicts (Dewey and Bento, 2009). CA programs are now available for different contexts like in education (CASE), in mathematics (CAME), and in technology (CATE).

Philosophy for children is a network whose approach is associated with Lipman (1980) and has been further developed by Fisher (1995, 1998) in UK (Wilson, 2000). The P4C is an example of a cognitive education approach from a philosophical perspective (Lipman, 1991). Based on the assumption that children are natural philosophers, the program aims to help children to think for themselves by exploring alternatives, considering evidence logically and objectively and searching for reasons. Dialogue in P4C classrooms is characterized as Socratic, with an emphasis on exploration and questioning (McGuinness, 2005).

1039Maryam Sedaghat and Soudeh Rahmani / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 30 (2011) 1037 – 1042 Maryam Sedaghat / Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 00 (2011) 000–000

3

1.2. Infusion approaches

In infusion approach, a variety of thinking skills have been teaches across a range of existing curricula. Therefore curricular content and thinking skills have been taught and learnt together (Swartz and parks, 1994). This aims to embed the teaching of thinking in all subjects so thinking skills permeate all aspects of student’s academic life (Dewey and Bento, 2009). The infusion approach aims to develop children's ability to recognize and use common patterns of thinking, deepen their understanding of curriculum topics and make connections between them (McGuinness and Sheehy, 2008). The methodology of infusion is based on taxonomy of thinking (Swartz and parks, 1994) and the importance of meta-cognition (McGuinness, 2005). It delineates the thinking skills of critical thinking, creative thinking, searching for meaning, problem solving and decision making with meta-cognition at the core of all these processes (Dewey and Bento, 2009). Infusion can be subject-specific (science, mathematics, history) or may be developed on a wider scale across the curriculum (McGuinness, et al. 2006). In reviewing of the infusion approach in curriculum, variety of theoretical perspectives is remarkable. For this reason, the examples that their main focus are on cognitive and meta-cognitive strategies were investigated. Although dispositions beneath infusion approach have been discussed in some categories, it is introduced as distinct approach due to its importance and consideration of the emotional and motivational aspects of thinking. An explicit methodology has been developed for infusing of the critical and creating thinking through content instruction in primary and secondary schools (Swartz and Parks, 1994; Swartz, 2001). The Activating Children’s Thinking Skills (ACTS) project in Northern Ireland (McGuinness, 2000; McGuinness, et al. 2006; Dewey and Bento, 2009) is another example builds on infusion framework.

1.3. Thinking dispositions approach

Different definitions of thinking dispositions are available. Although being a good thinker means having certain types of critical thinking and creative ability, the reality is that ability alone is not enough and good thinkers must have motivation, attitudes, values and habits in addition to abilities (Tishman and Andreade, 1995). Thinking dispositions are not neuronal structure in the hardware of brain, rather they are cultural phenomena and the result of the interaction between the beliefs, values, and environmental norms (Perkins, and Tishman, 1998). Although there are a few researches about education of thinking disposition, all results confirm that the way of teaching can promote thinking dispositions (Langer, Bashner, and Chanowitz, 1985). In considering how to teach thinking dispositions, it is important to note that each class has a culture that explicitly and implicitly give messages to students. Scholars have emphasized that the individuals’ actions including their intellectual actions typically is related to their context and in schools like any other places, learners tend to act so that it fits their environment (Brown, Collins, and Dugid,1989; Perkins, 1992). Finally it can be said that enculturation is suitable pattern to improve students’ thinking dispositions (Costa, 1991).

2. Result and Discussion

As it was mentioned, enrichment is one of the oldest and the most experienced approaches for teaching thinking. Instrumental Enrichment, cognitive Acceleration and philosophy for children are some of its programs.

Enrichment programs have powerful structure and system and are executed during specified periods. Compiling of specific educational content and teacher training programs are other features of these programs. In fact, clear conceptualizations and systematic experimental methods are the advantages of these programs (Dewey and Bento, 2009). Long time implementation and the possibility of losing participants; requirement of hours more than curriculum; weakness in transfer due to independence of context and nature of material and teacher training problem are the most striking problems in these programs. Perhaps the reported lack of effectiveness of enrichment

1040 Maryam Sedaghat and Soudeh Rahmani / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 30 (2011) 1037 – 1042 Maryam Sedaghat / Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 00 (2011) 000–000

4

programs is due to these restrictions. Hence it seems that IE is more effective for the specific groups such as children who have mental disability or cognitive disorder.

Cognitive acceleration as an enrichment program requires adequate teacher training, educational support in the classroom, communication network within school, and administrative support. In the other word, there are several necessary factors for the success of this program. However, research has shown the long-term effects of this program on academic achievement of the students (Dewey and Bento, 2009).

Although the P4C is not more than a general focus on creative and critical thinking, its advantages is emphasizing on bi and multilateral discussions in the classroom. One of the problems of 20 studies which confirming P4C program, is the lack of adequate control group (Sternberg, and Bhana, 1996).Furthermore, competitive atmosphere of classrooms produces serious constraints for free talks among students (Barrow, 2010).

In Infusion approach, thinking is included in the usual curriculum content; moreover, understanding and thinking about a topic can be happened simultaneously. Although most of programs with infusion approach had a clear curriculum materials and opportunities for teacher training (such as summer schools) they have been barely considered in the form of controlled evaluation studies. Meanwhile, it has been also asserted that infusion is a good strategy for intelligent students, since these are able to identify common thinking patterns, so they take advantage of it and deepen their understanding (Bruer, 1993, as cited in McGuinnes, et al. 2006). To achieve the goal of permeating thinking skills in all aspects of student’s academic life major changes in the existing curriculum content and teaching methods are needed and expert teachers should be trained. Taking long time to change the patterns is the main limitation for this approach.

Thinking dispositions approach pays attention to many elements. Attention to motivational and emotional aspects, improvement of thinking language, appreciation of high-level of the knowledge, development of strategies to manage thinking, improving transfer of the knowledge, making thinking visible for children who has not achieved abstract thinking stage, using all class materials and facilities, emphasis on facilitative role of teacher and active role of students, connecting course content with the real life and decontextualization of thinking are the most important elements. Despite effective classroom activities and positive results of this approach, enculturation is facing with obstacles. Since this approach emphasize on teacher competence, curriculum management in such classes require special educational skills. Teachers should have commitment to higher order thinking. Achievement of expected results in enculturation is a time and energy consuming process. Flexibility and lack of commitment to predetermined teaching framework are some eventualities of this method. Also, to avoid conflict between school, family and community, this approach needs a social support. Eventually, it can be concluded that the successful improvement of the thinking requires changes in the culture of classroom, school and society. To maintain improvement of all kinds of thinking, an open- minded attitude on the nature of knowledge is required in the classrooms which promotes comfortable educational environment for contribution of the students in intellectually challenging tasks, dialogues about thinking, working collaboratively, and being meta-cognitive (McGuinnes, 2005).

3. Conclusion

As mentioned, the main goal of education is training thoughtful students who are able to identify the ambiguous and complex thinking situations and they are also capable to think actively and independently. Reviewing of the different teaching thinking approaches and related programs showed that each of them has advantages and disadvantages, but it does not mean that selection or production of an approach and program with a relative success is unfeasible. It seems that rigid, inflexible and non-affecting dealing with thinking is the major problems of educational system in Iran. Students generally perceive thinking as an abstract, non-attractive and apart from real life. This is the reason that enriching curriculum with exhaustive programs of thinking skills (enrichment) or entering thinking teaching to curriculum issues (infusion) seems not effective. Nowadays, students need to feel the actual effect of thinking in their life. Perhaps an objective thinking looks odd or impossible but it was observed in thinking disposition approach that making thinking visible is possible. In addition, impenetrable barrier between the

1041Maryam Sedaghat and Soudeh Rahmani / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 30 (2011) 1037 – 1042 Maryam Sedaghat / Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 00 (2011) 000–000

5

student and thinking could be overcome by motivation of thinking in the context of school and class, so thinking will become integrated part of their academic and social life. Inefficiency in the motivating of the students for thinking is the reason which makes thinking dispositions as a good approach for teaching thinking in Iran and weakness in thinking skills is not the case. A thorough commitment in all pillars of education is needed to attain the main goal. Otherwise, successful training of thoughtful students will not be easily reached.

References

Adey, P., & Shayer, M. (1994). Really raising standards: Cognitive intervention and academic achievement. London: Routledge. Barrow, W. (2010). Dialogic, participation and the potential for Philosophy for Children. Thinking Skills and Creativity.

doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2010.01.002 Brown, J., S., Collins, A., & Dugid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Research, 18 (1), 32-42. Costa, A. L. (1991). The school as a home for the mind. Palatine. LL: Skylight Publishing Dewey, J., bento, J. (2009). Activating children’s thinking skills (ACTS): The effects of an infusion approach to teaching thinking in primary

schools. British journal of educational psychology, 79, 329-351. Fiske, A.P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H.R., & Nisbett, R.E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G.

Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp.915–981). New York: McGraw-Hill. Harpaz, Y. (2007). Approaches to Teaching Thinking: Toward a Conceptual Mapping of the Field. Teachers College Record, 109 (8), 1845-

1874. Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Langer, E. Bashner, R., and Chanowitz, B. (1985). Decreasing prejudice by increasing discrimination. J. Prrs. Soc. Psych. 49: 113-120. Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. McGuinness, C. (1999). From Thinking Skills to Thinking Classrooms: A review and evaluation of approaches for developing pupils' thinking.

Nottingham: DfEE Publications. McGuinness, C. (2000). ACTS: A methodology for teaching thinking across the curriculum. Teaching Thinking, 2, 1–12. McGuinness, C. (2005). Teaching Thinking: Theory and practice. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Special Monograph Series,

Pedagogy – Learning for Teaching, No 3. pp 107-127. McGuinness, C., Eakin, A., Curry, C., & Sheehy, N. (2006). Building thinking skills in thinking classrooms. ACTS (Activating Children's

Thinking Skills) in Northern Ireland. Retrieved from http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/021/vol1/015/ecp2107015.pdf McGuinness, C., Sheehy, N. (2008). Thinking skills in thinking classrooms. How children learned to make connections. Retrieved from

http://www.tlrp.org/dspace/handle/123456789/1354 Miyamoto, Y., Nisbett, R. E., & Masuda, T. (2008). Culture and the Physical Environment Holistic Versus Analytic. Culture and affordances, 17

(2), 113-119. Nisbet, J. (1990). Teaching Thinking: An introduction to the research literature. (Spotlight no. 26) Edinburgh: SCRE. Nisbett ,R. E., Peng, K. Choi , I., Norenzayan, A. (2008). Culture and Systems of Thought: Holistic vs. Analytic Cognition. Retrieved from

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~nisbett/images/cultureThought.pdf Perkins, D. N. (1992). Smartr schools: From training memory to educating minds. New York: Free Press. Perkins, D. N., Jay, E. & Tishman, S. (1993a). Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking. Merrill-palmer quarterly, 39 (1), 1-21. Perkins, D. N., Tishman, S. (1998). Dispositional aspect of intelligence. Retrieved January 20, 2007, from

http://learnweb.harvard.edu/alps/thinking/docs/Plymouth.htm Ritchhart, R., Perkins, D. (2008). Making thinking visible. Educational leadership, 65 (5), 57-61. Romney, D. M., & Samuel, M. T. (2001). A meta-analytic evaluation of Feuerstein’s instrumental enrichment program. Educational and Child

Psychology, 18(4), 19–34. Salmon, A.K. (2008). Promoting a culture of thinking in the young child. Early Childhood Educ J, 35, 457–461 Salomon, G. (1994). To be or not to be mindful. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. April

4-8, New Orleans, LA. Savell, J. M., Twohig, P. T., & Rachford, D. L. (1986). Empirical status of Feuerstein’s instrumental enrichment (FIE) technique as a method of

teaching thinking skills. Review of Educational Research, 56, 381–409. Shabani, H. (1995). Effects of problem-solving technique as teamwork on critical thinking and academic achievement of fourth grade elementary

students in Tehran. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Tarbiat Modares University. [In Persian] Shayer, M., & Beasley, F. (1987). Does instrumental enrichment work? British Educational Research Journal, 13(2), 101–119. Slavin, R. E. (2006). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (8th Ed.). New York: Pearson. Sternberg, R., & Bhana, K. (1996). Synthesis of research on the effectiveness of intellectual skills programmes: Snake oil remedies or miracle

cures? Educational Leadership, 44(2), 60–67. Swartz, R. J. (2001). Infusing critical and creative thinking into content instruction. In A. L. Costa (Ed.). Developing minds: A resource for

teaching thinking (3rd Ed.). (pp. 266–274).

1042 Maryam Sedaghat and Soudeh Rahmani / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 30 (2011) 1037 – 1042 Maryam Sedaghat / Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 00 (2011) 000–000

6

Swartz, R., & Parks, S. (1994). Infusing the teaching of critical and creative thinking into content instruction: A lesson design handbook for the elementary grades. California: Critical Thinking Press and Software.

TIMSS 2007 International Press Release. Retrieved from http://timss.bc.edu/timss2007/release.html Tishman, S., & Andreade, A. (1995). Thinking dispositions: A review of current Theories, practices and issues. Retrieved from

http://learnweb.harvard.edu/alps/thinking/docs/Dispositions.htm Trickey, S., & Topping, K. J. (2004). Philosophy for children: A systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 19(3), 365–380. Wilson, V. (2000). Can Thinking Skills be Taught? Education Forum on Teaching Thinking Skills Report. Retrieved from http://www.pre-

online.co.uk/feature_pdfs/spotlight79.pdf Yazdan panah, A. (2007). Designing curriculum pattern to develop thinking dispositions of students. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Tarbiat

Modares University. [In Persian]