a political sociology of european democracy. 2 a political sociology of european democracy week 1...

A Political A Political Sociology Sociology of of European European DemocracDemocracyy

2

A Political A Political Sociology Sociology of of European European DemocracDemocracyy Week 1Week 1

Lecture 1Lecture 1

LecturerLecturer

Paul BlokkerPaul Blokker

3

Introduction– MA in Political Science, University of

Amsterdam;– PhD. from the European University Institute in

Social and Political Sciences (2004);– Postdoc at Universities of Liverpool and Sussex

(with prof. Gerard Delanty);– Research interests in (radical) democracy,

multiple democracies, European integration, constitutionalism(-s), constitutional critique, participation, dissent;

Introduction

Governo LocaleGoverno Locale

4

Introduction– Current project:

Constitutional Politics in Post-Westphalian Europe (COPOLIS);

– Including interest in the case of Icelandic “grass-roots constitutionalism”

Introduction


5

Website

Introduction


bit.ly/PolSocEU

6

Introduction: Course Objectives1. Exploration of a (critical) political sociology

of European integration in general and of European democracy in particular;

2. Relation of European Studies to democratic theory;

3. Exploration of fruitfulness of political-sociological approach with regard to specific empirical cases.

Introduction


7

Introduction: Rationale & Programme- The first part will discuss the role of a

political sociology of democratic politics in the context of the changing contours of democracy and of the political in general.

• Attention to ideas, institutions, (civil) society, European society.

• Exploration of fragmentation and pluralisation of democratic politics (political and constitutional pluralism; post-nationalism).

Introduction


8

Introduction: Rationale & Programme- The second part will approach the

possibility of democracy from the angles of different democratic theories.

• Democratic legitimation on the European level;• Different theories of European democracy,

emphasising different actors and different forms and intensities of legitimation;

• The role of a European demos and European identity.• The possibility of post-national democracy.

Introduction


9

Introduction: Rationale & Programme- The third part will deal with concrete

cases of political conflict, crisis, and participation from above and below.

• Specific devices of a political-sociological approach: actor-focused; interpretative; class; networks; contestation and critique.

• Case-studies of enlargement, the European Convention, European Social Forum, judges and lawyers.

Introduction


10

Introduction: Programme1. Introduction: A Political-Sociological Approach to the EU2. The Westphalian Nation-State and European Integration3. Democracy on the European level4. The Democratic Deficit: Formal and Informal Aspects5. The Construction of a European Political Society6. Multiple Democracies I: Stakeholder Democracy7. Multiple Democracies II: Communitarian Democracy8. Multiple Democracies III: Post-National Democracy9. Heuristic Devices of a Political-Sociological Approach 10. Focus I: Political Elites, Classes, Epistemic Communities11. Focus II: Social Movements, Civic Actors, Contentious Politics12. Focus III: Perceptions of European Democracy

Introduction


11

Introduction


12

Why a Sociology of the EU?a. Emphasis on European society

(in contrast to European institutions)- Transnational networks/fields

- European public sphere(-s)- Civil movements and civic initiatives

Introduction


13

Why a Sociology of the EU?b. Sociological dimension to

European integration:- Ideas (as opposed to interests)- Discourses/narratives- Identity- Culture - Norms/institutions

Introduction


14

Why a Political Sociology of European democracy?

a. Emphasis on role of social actors in democratization (in contrast to exclusive focus on European institutions)- Social movements, associations

- European public sphere(-s)

- Variety of democratic channels and forms of political and civic action

Introduction


15


b. Emphasis on ideational, cultural dimension- Democratic discourses- Variety of democratic political

cultures

Introduction


16


c. Emphasis on critical, pluralist approach- Representative democracy vs.

participatory approaches- The role of critique, conflict and

dissent

Introduction


17


• Role of civic participation in addressing problems of (post-national) democracy?

• Role of conflict and dissent in formation European political society;

• Need for socio-political imagination in studying democracy on European level;

• Relating a plurality of normative models to socio-political reality;

• European democracy as well as Europeanization of democracies in Europe.

Introduction


18

The transformation of modern democracy

Introduction


19

The 4 mutations of modern democracy

(Rosanvallon 2006: 219ff)a. A differentiation of the political;b. A pluralization of the agents of the

political;c. A dissemination of the political;d. An increasing secularization of the

political.

Introduction


20

The 4 mutations of modern democracy(Rosanvallon 2006: 219ff)a. A differentiation of the political

There is a growing disentanglement of sovereignty and government, two functions that were closely related in the modern nation-state

Regulatory schemes operate on the transnational level (EU law; WTO; Human rights schemes)

Introduction


21

The 4 mutations of modern democracy(Rosanvallon 2006: 219ff)b. A pluralization of the agents of the

political;The classical agent of the political is the citizen who was represented through procedural forms (elections). Today, however, there are new forms of representation developing (expertise, moral).

Experts represent stakeholders in governance networks. Charities represent a problem (poverty).

Introduction


22

The 4 mutations of modern democracy(Rosanvallon 2006: 219ff)c. A dissemination of the political;

Originally, individual emancipation (Locke) was distinguished from collective emancipation (Rousseau). Today these two forms are inextricably linked.

The difference between liberalism and democracy has largely collapsed.

Introduction


23

The 4 mutations of modern democracy(Rosanvallon 2006: 219ff)d. An increasing secularization of the

political;We are living through the end of democracy based on the will. The idea that there exists a “general will” is cast in doubt today.

It is increasingly clear that a unified agent – a people – is difficult to identify and in reality there are many different “wills”.

Introduction


24

The transformation of modern democracy(Ferrara 2011: 67ff)- A first transformation of democracy was from an

ancient idea of democracy (the rule of the many) to a modern, representative democracy.

- Modern democracy adds three aspects to democratic autonomy:- Individual rights- Constitution and constitutionalism

- The Nation-State

Introduction


25

The transformation of modern democracy(Ferrara 2011: 67ff)- A second major transformation is occurring

today: the relativization of the nation-society, and the emergence of a ‘world society’ or ‘international community’.

- What does democracy mean in this context? Can democracy mean the same thing as when applied to a singular and national political regime?

Introduction


26

The transformation of modern democracy

(Ferrara 2011: 67ff)- When evaluating the European integration

project and its democratic standards, can we talk about a democratic deficit?

- As Ferrara argues, it is only possibility to speak of a democratic deficit if we have a clear benchmark of what democracy should look like (such as the ‘national measure’).

Introduction


27

The transformation of modern democracy(Ferrara 2011: 67ff)- Using the ‘national measure’ for evaluating the

democraticness of the EU is however problematic.- The shift from government to governance means:

- A shift from clear, centralized authority to shared authority

- A shift from direct sanctions to soft, indirect sanctions- A shift in the meaning of legitimacy

Introduction


28

The transformation of modern democracy(Ferrara 2011: 67ff)- Using the ‘national measure’ for evaluating the

democraticness of the EU is however problematic.- The shift from government to governance means:

- A shift from clear, centralized authority to shared authority

- A shift from direct sanctions to soft, indirect sanctions- A shift in the meaning of legitimacy

Introduction


29

The transformation of modern democracy(Ferrara 2011: 67ff)- The new emphasis on governance points to a

mode of politics/political coordination which entails ‘control without commanding’

- How does governance relate to democracy? Is democracy necessary based on majority rule and elections?

- Can governance be understood as invoking a different view of democracy, based on consensus-building between stakeholders?

Introduction


30

The transformation of modern democracy(Ferrara 2011: 67ff)- According to Ferrara, ‘the idea that democracy

means that citizens are in the ultimate analysis authors of the laws to which to obey is to be substituted for by the idea that democracy means that citizens are ultimately the subscribers, free and equal, of a constitutional pact which in turn serves as a standard of legitimacy for any legislative, regulatory and administrative product’ (75)

Introduction


a political sociology of european democracy. 2 a political sociology of european democracy week 1...

Documents

european political society

european society

european convention

european demos

european identity

introduction ma

political sciences

political elites