a novel porous carbon derived from hydrothermal carbon for...
TRANSCRIPT
C A R B O N 7 7 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 6 2 7 – 6 3 6
.sc ienced i rec t .com
Avai lab le a t wwwScienceDirect
journal homepage: www.elsevier .com/ locate /carbon
A novel porous carbon derived from hydrothermalcarbon for efficient adsorption of tetracycline
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.05.0670008-6223/� 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
* Corresponding author: Fax: +86 21 65642297.E-mail address: [email protected] (S. Zhang).
Xiangdong Zhu, Yuchen Liu, Chao Zhou, Gang Luo, Shicheng Zhang *, Jianmin Chen
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention (LAP3), Department of Environmental Science and Engineering,
Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
A R T I C L E I N F O
Article history:
Received 1 January 2014
Accepted 23 May 2014
Available online 6 June 2014
A B S T R A C T
Increasing attention is being paid to hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of waste biomass,
due to energy shortages, environmental crises and developing customer demands. How-
ever, most research has been dedicated to the production of bio-oil, with few studies focus-
ing on the application of hydrothermal carbon (hydrochar), a solid residue from HTC of
biomass. In this study, a novel porous carbon (PC) was prepared from hydrochar, via pyro-
lysis at different temperatures (300–700 �C), the characteristics of PC as well as tetracycline
(TC) adsorption behavior were investigated. The hydrochar and PC samples showed a
remarkable range of surface properties, as characterized by Boehm titration, the Fourier
transform infrared spectra and nuclear magnetic resonance spectra. The changes in char-
acteristics suggested that the PC samples produced at high activation temperature
(500–700 �C) were well carbonized and exhibited a high surface area (>270 m2/g). Linear
relationships were obtained between Freundlich adsorptive capacity (KF) and elemental
atomic ratios, surface area and pore volume. The high adsorption capacity of PC samples
can be attributed to its low polarity and high aromaticity, surface area and pore volume.
The molecular variations among the hydrochar and PC samples translated into differences
in their ability to adsorb TC.
� 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
In the last few years, the hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of
waste biomass has received increasing attention for several
reasons: (1) the precursors are readily renewable and cheap,
(2) it is a simple and environmentally friendly (‘‘green’’) pro-
cess, (3) bio-oil, chemicals and carbonaceous solids can be
obtained simultaneously [1]. The advantage of HTC over the
pyrolysis process of biomass is that it can convert wet input
material into carbonaceous solids at relatively high yields [2].
Much attention has been focused on obtaining bio-oil from
the HTC process; studies on the application of carbonaceous
solids are very scarce. The carbonaceous solids, (i.e., hydro-
thermal carbon, hydrochar), have a less aromatic structure
and thermal recalcitrance, a low surface area and poor poros-
ity, hindering the effective exploitation of hydrochar for
environmental and agricultural applications [2–5]. As a conse-
quence, a post-activation method is required to increase the
surface area and porosity of hydrochar.
The easiest possibility for the development of the surface
area of hydrochar is thermal treatment under an inert atmo-
sphere, where small organic molecules are removed to gener-
ate microporosity, thereby reaching a specific surface area are
comparable to conventional carbon materials [3].
Hydrochar-derived black carbon (i.e., porous carbon, PC)
can be considered structurally similar to pyrochar and
628 C A R B O N 7 7 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 6 2 7 – 6 3 6
activated carbon, consisting primarily of short stacks of
graphite sheets with O-containing groups rimmed on the
edge to form connected microporous networks [6]. Biomass-
derived pyrochar shows an extraordinary strong affinity for
hydrophobic and hydrophilic organic contaminants removal,
due to its large specific surface area, pore volume and abun-
dant functional groups [6–8]. Since activation of waste hydro-
char with thermal treatment can change the surface area as
well as the amounts and types of functional groups, its
adsorption capability can be affected.
Tetracycline (TC) is widely used in aquaculture and veteri-
nary medicines to improve growth rates and feed efficiencies
[9,10]. TC is excreted through feces and urine as un-metabo-
lized matter, and the most negative effect is the development
of multi-resistant bacterial strains that can no longer be trea-
ted with presently known drugs [10]. Due to its potential risk,
it is of great importance to explore efficient and cost-effective
treatment technologies for TC removal. TC is amphoteric
compound and contains multiple functional groups such as
phenol and alcohol, which are active and can induce complex
reactions with black carbon.
It has been reported that various adsorbents, including
black carbon, can remove TC by means of surface adsorption,
metal bridging, H-bonding and p–p interaction between TC
and the corresponding structural components of the adsor-
bents [6,7,11]. However, no relevant studies have been per-
formed to test the adsorption behavior of TC on waste
hydrochar-derived PC.
In this work, PC samples were produced at different tem-
peratures from real hydrochar that was obtained from a
pilot-scale plant. To our knowledge, there is no research that
discusses the characterization and adsorption behaviors of
waste hydrochar-derived PC in the literature. The objective
of this study was, therefore, the investigation of the effects
of activation temperature on the characterization of waste
hydrochar-derived PC and on the performance of PC in
adsorbing TC from aqueous solutions. The materials pro-
duced in this study were then characterized in terms of
porosity, structure, composition and functionality. It is
expected that this work will enhance the production value
of waste biomass HTC and promote the development of
HTC in industry.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Thermal conversion of waste hydrochar
The waste hydrochar was produced from Salix psammophila of
HTC at 300 �C [12]. A more detailed procedure for the prepara-
tion of hydrochar is available in Supporting Information. The
waste hydrochar was activated via thermal conversion under
nitrogen gas (N2) conditions at 300, 400, 500, 600 and 700 �C. In
brief, the hydrochar samples of 5 g were packed into a cera-
mic pot and then pyrolyzed at different temperatures in a
box-type resistance furnace (SLQ1100-30, Shengli Co., Ltd.,
Shanghai) under N2 flow of 1 L min�1 for 4 h at a heating rate
of 4 �C min�1. The yield of the PC samples were recorded and
then milled to pass through a 0.25 mm sieve (60 mesh) prior
to further analyses. The activated samples are hereafter
referred to as P300, P400, P500, P600 and P700, where the suffix
number represents the activation temperature.
2.2. Characterization of samples
The elemental (C, H, N) analyses were performed with an
Elemental Analyzer Vario EL 3 instrument. Ash content was
measured by heating the samples at 200 �C for 1 h and then
at 500 �C for an additional 4 h under an air atmosphere [13].
The pH of samples was measured in a suspension of 1:10
sample/deionized water using a combination electrode. The
suspension was shaken for 1 h before measurement [14].
The oxygenated acidic groups and basic components of sam-
ples were determined using the Boehm’s titration method
[15]. A more detailed account of the Boehm’s titration is avail-
able in Supporting Information.
The thermogravimetry (TG) and derivative thermogravi-
metric (DTG) of the hydrochar sample were analyzed by a
thermo-gravimetric analyzer (Perkin Elmer, USA) under an
N2 atmosphere, by heating the sample from room tempera-
ture to 800 �C at a rate of 10 �C min�1. The Brunauer–
Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area of the samples was deter-
mined with a N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm measured
at 77 K using a Quantasorb SI instrument (Quantachrone,
USA). The morphology of samples was examined by scanning
electron microscopy (SEM) using a Philips (XL300) microscope.
The functional groups and surface properties of samples were
examined through solid state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance
(NMR) spectra with cross polarization magic angle spinning
(Bruker DSX 300) and Fourier transform-infrared (FT-IR, Nexus
470) techniques. The samples were also characterized by
X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray photoelectron spectrometer
(XPS) techniques; and, the binding energies for the high-
resolution spectra were calibrated by setting C to 1 s at
284.6 eV.
2.3. Batch sorption experiment
Tetracycline (TC) was selected as the model compound.
Adsorption isotherms were obtained at the concentration
range of 5–50 mg L�1 TC, and the background solution was
0.02 M sodium chloride (NaCl) [6]. To initiate the experiments,
a 60 mL amber glass vial with 40 mL sorption solution
received a weighted amount of sorbent (0.04 g) and was then
shaken at 150 rpm for 4 days at 30 �C. After reaching sorption
equilibrium, the suspensions were filtered through a 0.45 lm
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane filter, and aliquots
of the filtrate were analyzed by UV–vis spectroscopy [16].
The absorbance of TC was measured at 360 nm.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Characterizations of hydrochar and porous carbonsamples
3.1.1. TG-DTG analysis of hydrochar sampleThe pyrolysis characteristics, (i.e. both TG and DTG curves)
are shown in Fig. S1. Weight loss of the hydrochar sample
occurred between 130 and 700 �C, and the amount of solid
C A R B O N 7 7 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 6 2 7 – 6 3 6 629
residue left was around �60% (wt). In the DTG curve, there
were five major weight loss peaks. The decomposition peak
at 238 �C may be attributed to the loss of residual hemicellu-
lose [17], however, the other four peaks may be assigned to
different boiling point products derived from the decomposi-
tion of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin during the HTC
process. In addition, the residual lignin contributed to the
wide and flat DTG peak, due to its slow carbonization process.
Thus, the activation temperatures at 300, 400, 500, 600 and
700 �C for the prepared PC samples corresponded to the
decomposition degree of different components within the
hydrochar.
3.1.2. Proximate analysis and elemental compositionsTable 1 displays the numerical results for proximate and ele-
mental analysis of hydrochar and PC samples. Yields declined
gradually from 300 to 700 �C, due to the slow decomposition
of the components of hydrochar. The final yield of PC sample
was 61.6%, which was consistent with the TG measurement.
The ash content increased slightly up to 500 �C and stabilized
at �23% at higher temperature. An acidic pH for the hydro-
char was observed, due to the solubilization of inorganic frac-
tion and acidic products gathered in the solid residue [18].
The pH of the PC samples increased with the increasing tem-
perature, suggesting that higher activation temperature led to
the higher pH of the PC due to the separating of alkali salts
from organic component and basic organic oxides [19,20].
This was important for the employment of porous carbon,
because the natural alkalinity of char can resist soil acidity
and improve crop growth and yield [13].
The relative element contents showed the gradual losses
of H and O, which resulted from the condensation reactions
for raw hydrochar. The content of N was relatively stable,
but showed a maximum (1.60%) at 500 �C, suggesting enrich-
ment of N-containing compounds [21]. The molar ratios of
elements were calculated to estimate the aromaticity (H/C)
and polarity (O/C, O + N/C) of the samples and a typical van
Krevelen diagram, which is shown in Fig. S2.
As expected, raw hydrochar followed the typical dehydra-
tion reaction as a function of activation temperature up to
700 �C. Lower molar ratios were obtained in P700 sample, indi-
cating its high aromaticity and low polarity compared to the
raw hydrochar, due to the formation of aromatic structures
with a higher degree of carbonization of organic matter and
the removal of polar components [14].
Table 1 – Yields, pH, ash contents, elemental compositions and aprepared under various temperatures.
Sample Yielda (%) pHb Asha (%) Cc (%) Hc
HC 100 5.2 15.2 66.3 5.21P300 89.5 6.7 14.7 72.1 4.12P400 81.0 7.6 15.8 72.9 3.58P500 71.1 7.9 22.8 80.7 3.21P600 66.2 8.5 22.9 92.5 2.98P700 61.6 11.8 23.7 94.1 2.54a Yields and ash contents are on a water-free basis.b The ratios of char and deionized water are 1:10 (wt/wt).c Elemental compositions and atomic ratios are on a water- and ash-free
oxygen to carbon. (O + N)/C: atomic ratio of sum of oxygen and nitrogen t
3.1.3. Surface area and morphologyAs shown in Table 2, the surface area of hydrochar was extre-
mely low (7.16 m2/g). This can be related to pore blockage, due
to the presence of organic matter that was not transferred to
the liquid phase during HTC process or due to compounds
from liquid phase that migrated to the surface of the hydro-
char [22]. The surface area of the PC samples gradually
increased from 7.16 to 288 m2/g up to 500 �C and became sta-
ble at higher temperatures.
The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms and pore size dis-
tribution are exhibited in Figs. S3 and S4, respectively. Accord-
ing to the IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied
Chemistry) classification [23], the N2 isotherm for hydrochar
is of type III (macroporous adsorption with weak adsorbate–
adsorbent interaction), suggesting that the raw hydrochar
possessed less developed porous structure. However, the N2
isotherms for the P300 and P400 samples were of type I and
IV (micropore adsorption and appearance of adsorption hys-
teresis, respectively), which is indicative of microporous and
mesporous structures. Interestingly, the N2 isotherms for
P500, P600 and P700 evolved to type I (micropore adsorption),
reflecting the evolution of microporous structure. As shown
in Fig. S4, it is evident that mesopores of about 4 nm in diam-
eter increased considerably when the activation temperature
was higher; and, the total pore volume of the PC increased
from 0.055 to 0.242 cm3/g accordingly with increasing activa-
tion temperature (Table 2).
The morphologies of the hydrochar and PC samples are
illustrated in Fig. 1. The raw hydrochar appeared to be a
sphere-like structure (�15 lm in diameter), which was caused
by the degradation of the cellulose component during the
HTC process and its subsequent precipitation and growth as
spheres [24]. In addition, there were some rudimentary pores
(�100 nm in diameter) within the structure, due to the change
of composition owing to thermal decomposition [25]. In all PC
samples, it could be observed that, the sphere was broken and
split into flat structure. Furthermore, the sponge-like struc-
ture confirmed the existence of cavities, and the development
of which is dependent on the activation temperature.
3.1.4. Surface acidity and basicityTable 3 presents the oxygen-containing functional groups and
total alkalines (including all mineral salt and basic groups,
such as ketones, pyrones and chromens) from the Boehm
titration. The data indicated that three groups of organic acids
tomic ratios of waste hydrochar (HC) and porous carbon (PC)
(%) Nc (%) Oc (%) H/Cc O/Cc (O + N)/Cc
1.26 27.2 0.942 0.307 0.3241.54 22.3 0.685 0.232 0.2501.54 22.0 0.590 0.226 0.2441.60 14.5 0.477 0.134 0.1511.49 3.00 0.387 0.024 0.0381.40 1.92 0.324 0.015 0.028
basis. H/C: atomic ratio of hydrogen to carbon. O/C: atomic ratio of
o carbon.
HC HC
P700
P500P400
Fig. 1 – Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of raw hydroxchar (HC) and selected PC samples.
Table 2 – Surface area, pore size and pore volume parameters for waste hydrochar (HC) and porous carbon prepared undervarious temperatures.
Sample Surface areaa
(m2/g)Pore sizeb (d, nm) Vmic
c (cm3/g) Vmesd (cm3/g) Vt
e (cm3/g) Vmic/Vt
HC 7.16 30.5 0.004 0.051 0.055 0.07P300 80.3 3.73 0.018 0.064 0.082 0.22P400 142 3.73 0.036 0.124 0.160 0.23P500 288 3.99 0.124 0.088 0.212 0.58P600 270 4.01 0.117 0.098 0.215 0.54P700 316 4.03 0.136 0.106 0.242 0.56a Measured using N2 adsorption with the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method.b Pore size in diameter calculated by the desorption data using Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method.c Micropore volume calculated using the t-plot method.d Mesopore volume calculated as the difference between the Vt and Vmic.e Total pore volume determined at P/P0 = 0.99.
630 C A R B O N 7 7 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 6 2 7 – 6 3 6
including carboxylic, lactonic and phenolic decreased with
increasing activation temperature, due to the removal of com-
ponents, however, the carbonylic group sharply decreased
before 500 �C and then gradually increased. Interestingly, total
acidity and basicity exhibited opposite trends. The total basi-
city increased with increasing activation temperature, due to
the increasing contents of ash and basic functional groups,
such as ketones, pyrones, and chromenes [13,26]. The total
basicity slightly decreased at 700 �C, due to the highly carbon-
ized sample. The results of Boehm titration illustrated that
the low-temperature PC sample were more organic in nature
[15].
Table 3 – Contents of oxygen-containing functional groups and total alkaline contents for waste hydrochar (HC) and porouscarbon prepared under various temperatures.
Sample Carboxylica Lactonicb Phenolicc Carbonylicd Total aciditye Total basicityf
HC 1.22 0.12 0.50 0.60 2.44 0.22P300 0.25 0.86 BDL 0.14 1.25 0.37P400 0.06 0.36 0.12 0.06 0.60 1.14P500 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.14 0.28 1.20P600 BDLg 0.10 BDL 0.16 0.26 1.22P700 BDL 0.04 0.02 0.20 0.26 0.85a The contents of carboxylic (mmol/g) calculated as the consumption of NaHCO3.b The contents of lactonic (mmol/g) calculated as the difference in the consumption between Na2CO3 and NaHCO3.c The contents of phenolic (mmol/g) calculated as the difference in the consumption between NaOH and Na2CO3.d The contents of carbonylic (mmol/g) calculated as the difference in the consumption between C2H5ONa and NaOH.e The total acidity (mmol/g) calculated as the consumption of C2H5ONa.f The total basicity (mmol/g) calculated as the consumption of HCl.g Below detectable level.
C A R B O N 7 7 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 6 2 7 – 6 3 6 631
3.1.5. FTIR analysisThe FTIR spectra and spectroscopic assignment of hydrochar
and PC samples are shown in Fig. 2 and Table S1, respectively.
No noteworthy changes occurred at 300 �C. After heating to
400 �C, the band intensities at 2920 and 2845 cm�1 (aliphatic
C-H stretching) were completely disappeared, due to removal
of low boiling points components (e.g. paraffin) of hydrochar.
A similar trend was observed for the band at 1314 cm�1,
which is an indicator of carboxyl or calcium oxalate. A new
band at 1408 cm�1 (CO32�) represented the presence of calcite
[27], which was resulted from the decomposition of calcium
oxalate at high temperatures [28].
Heating to 500 �C resulted in more substantial chemical
transformations. The polar group (band at 1700 cm�1) and
indicator of residual lignin (aromatic C@C vibration at
1442 cm�1) gradually decreased. Greater aromatic C@C
stretching vibrations (1600 cm�1) was observed; and, further
evidence for aromatic C was provided in the appearance of
the bands at 1021, 877, 790 and 746 cm�1 [29]. Interestingly,
these bands were dramatically diminished at 600 �C and com-
pletely disappeared at 700 �C. In addition, the functional
group was almost invisible at 700 �C, which closely resembled
FTIR spectra of graphitic domains of amorphous carbon
[21,30]. Hence, an increasing degree of condensation was
observed with the increasing heating temperature.
4000 3500 3000 2000 1500 1000 500
HC
P300
P400P500
P600P700
OHaliphatic C-H C=O
aromatic C=C
C=C
aromatic C-HC-H
Wavenumber (cm-1)
Abs
orba
nce
(arb
itary
uni
ts)
CO32-
-COOH
a
Fig. 2 – FTIR spectra (a) and X-ray diffraction patterns (b) of raw
ranging from 300 �C to 700 �C.
3.1.6. XRD analysisAs shown in Fig. 2, the XRD patterns of hydrochar and PC
samples had different peaks, indicating the presence of min-
eral crystals. It was noticed that the major crystalline phases
in hydrochar sample were whewellite (calcium oxalate, Ca(C2-
O4)Æ2H2O) and low-temperature quartz (SiO2). These are the
most frequent and abundant minerals in plants, indicating
that hydrochar was rich in calcium and silica [31,32].
As the heating temperature increased to 400 �C, a new
peak was observed and can be attributed to calcite (calcium
carbonate, CaCO3), which was originated from the heating
transformation of whewellite. The formation of calcite con-
tributed to the alkalinity of the studied PC samples, as shown
by their high pH values (Table 1). With further heating, the
peaks assigned to quartz and calcite (i.e. 26.4� and 29.2�,respectively) progressively increased in intensity and then
significantly decreased at 700 �C, indicating that decomposi-
tion of calcite was occurred at high temperature. In addition,
the XRD results confirmed the band changes of FTIR at
1408 and 1314 cm�1 (CO32�, carboxyl or calcium oxalate,
respectively).
3.1.7. XPS analysisTo obtain more detailed information regarding surface func-
tionality presented at the outer surface of the hydrochar
10 20 30 40 50
♦♦♦♦♥♦
♦♦
♥
••
••
•
♥
♥•♥• •• ♥♥♥♥
♥♥
♥♥
P700
P600
P500
P400
P300
••••
•
♥♦♦♦ ♦♦ ♦♦
♦
2θ
Diff
ract
ion
Inte
nsity
(arb
itary
uni
ts)
b ♦ whewellite • calcite ♥ quartz
♦ ♥
•
HC
hydrochar (HC) and PC samples generated at temperatures
632 C A R B O N 7 7 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 6 2 7 – 6 3 6
and PC sample, XPS was performed on representative sam-
ples (Fig. 3 and Table 4). The high resolution C 1(s) photoelec-
tron spectrum for the raw hydrochar sample included four
common signals, which can be attributed to the aliphatic/aro-
matic carbon groups (C1, C–Hx, and C–C), hydroxyl group (C2,
C–O–H), carbonyl group (C3, C@O), and carboxylic/ester/lac-
tone group (C4, O@C–O) [18]. Thermal treatment caused a
reduction from 80.0% to 75.8% in the C1 peak, indicating the
loss of volatile compounds and a resultant increase of surface
hydrophobicity [33]. However, the increased relative intensity
of the C1 peak was observed for calcination at more than
500 �C, suggesting a resultant increase in degree of aromatics
and condensation. The new C5 peak can be attributed to the
presence of carbonate produced from the degradation of whe-
wellite, as confirmed by XRD result. Increasing the activation
290 288 286 284 282 280
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
C1s (4)C1s (3)
C1s (2)
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
Bonding Energy (ev)
HC
C1s (1)
290 288 286 284 282 280
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
C1s (5)C1s (4)
C1s (3)C1s (2)In
tens
ity (a
.u.)
Bonding Energy (eV)
P500
C1s (1)
Fig. 3 – High-resolution XPS scans of C1 (s) photoelectron en
Table 4 – Experimental C1(s), binding energy (eV) and chemicalsample.
Sample C1 C2
sp2-Graphitic orC–C/C–Hx (%)
C–O (%)
HC 284.6/80.0 285.7/10.7P400 284.6/75.8 286.1/7.55P500 284.6/77.8 286.1/9.76P700 284.6/78.7 286.1/8.51a Below detectable level.
temperature to 700 �C led to a loss in the residual carbonate
group.
3.1.8. 13C CP NMR analysisThe changes of structure of the hydrochar and PC samples
could be further elucidated by the solid state 13C NMR spectra.
As shown in Fig. 4, the 13C NMR spectrum of hydrochar sam-
ple contained a range of C types. The obvious peaks at 168
and 30 ppm was assigned to the carboxyl group and long-
chain aliphatic structures, and other small peaks at 154 and
14 ppm were represented the presence of the phenolic group
and short-chain aliphatic structure. In addition, the small sig-
nals at 146 and 56 ppm were assigned to residual lignin and
represented O-substituted aromatic C and methoxyl C [34];
and, the peak at 75 ppm could be attributed to cellulose [35],
292 290 288 286 284 282 280
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
C1s (5)C1s (4)
C1s (3)C1s (2)
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
Bonding Energy (eV)
P400
C1s (1)
290 288 286 284 282 280
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
C1s (5)C1s (4)
C1s (3)C1s (2)In
tens
ity (a
.u.)
Bonding Energy (eV)
P700
C1s (1)
velope for raw hydrochar (HC) and selected PC samples.
state assignments for raw hydrochar (HC) and selected PC
C3 C4 C5
C@O (%) O@C–O (%) CO32� (%)
287.0/4.59 288.9/4.69 BDLa
287.0/8.98 288.9/4.89 289.5/2.76287.0/5.50 288.5/4.27 289.0/2.67287.0/9.23 288.1/1.65 289.3/1.91
∗∗
∗
P600∗
127
∗
∗
∗
127
P500∗
300 250 200 150 100 50 0 -50
∗∗
P700
127∗
ppm
∗
14
HC
168
30
14675
∗154
56
300 250 200 150 100 50 0 -50
∗
∗
∗
ppm
127
P400153∗
∗
P300
168
∗
30
128
14147
Fig. 4 – Stolid-state 13C NMR spectra of raw hydrochar (HC)
and PC samples generated at temperatures ranging from
300 �C to 700 �C (Asterisks mean spinning side bands).
C A R B O N 7 7 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 6 2 7 – 6 3 6 633
which indicated unconverted components of biomass during
the HTC process. The 13C NMR spectrum revealed that the
hydrochar sample was less aromatic in nature.
After heating, there was a clear change in the structure of
the PC samples. In the NMR spectrum of the P300 sample, the
signals at 154 ppm (phenolic group), 75 ppm (cellulose) and
56 ppm (lignin) completely disappeared; and, a new peak
became evident at 128 ppm, which can be assigned to
C- and H- substituted aromatic C, indicating the breakdown
of residual lignocellulose and HTC products. When the heat-
ing temperature increased to 400 �C, only a peak at 127 ppm
(aromatic C) remained in the PC sample, indicating the evolu-
tion of aromaticity. However, the peak at 153 ppm again
appeared, due to the transformation of lignin and cellulose.
At the higher activation temperatures (500, 600 and 700 �C),
spectra with only aromatic C were observed, due to its
increasing degree of carbonization. This also reflected that
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
HC
P300
P400P500
P600
Amou
nt S
orbe
d (q
e, m
g/g)
Equilibrium Concentration (Ce, mg/L)
P700a
Fig. 5 – Adsorption isotherms of TC for raw hydrochar (HC) and P
700 �C in aqueous solution.
the development of aromatic structure was greatly dependent
on the activation temperature. From the series of spectra,
spinning sidebands associated with the aryl peak (marked
with an asterisk) was clear, which occurred as the rate of
magic angle spinning became insufficient to overcome the
chemical shift anisotropy [36]. Overall, the NMR-derived char-
acteristics of the PC samples were in keeping with the data
from other characterization techniques (such as element
analysis, Boehm titration, FTIR).
3.2. Adsorption of tetracycline
3.2.1. Adsorption isothermsThe adsorption isotherms of TC for the raw hydrochar and PC
samples are presented in Fig. 5. The adsorption data were
fitted to the Freundlich model, Qe ¼ KFCne , where Qe (mg/g)
and Ce (mg/L) are the adsorbed and aqueous-phase
concentrations, respectively, at adsorption equilibrium; KF
(mg1�nLn/g) is the Freundlich constant indicating adsorptive
capacity; n (unitless) is the Freundlich linearity index
[6,14,15]. The fitting parameters are summarized in Table S2,
which shows that the Freundlich model reasonably fit all
adsorption data (R2 > 0.94).
Notably, the n values were <1 in all cases, thereby suggest-
ing nonlinearity in the isotherms [14]. The Freundlich adsorp-
tive capacity (KF) increased largely with increasing activation
temperatures, reflecting the high adsorption capacity of the
PC sample produced at 700 �C. The increase from HC to the
P300 sample was modest. In particular, KF increased dramat-
ically from the P300 to P400 samples, possibly due to the con-
siderable increase in surface area, which may have enhanced
the diffusion of TC into the well-developed pores [37].
3.2.2. Correlation between sample properties and TCadsorptionIt has been well documented in the literature that TC adsorp-
tion on carbonaceous material is driven by a combination of
pore-filling effect, nonspecific van der Waals forces and spe-
cific p–p electron–donor–acceptor (EDA) interaction with the
graphite surfaces mechanism [6,38]. Hence, the adsorption
behavior of carbonaceous material for TC may depend on
its various properties. To gain a direct comparison of the
-0.6 -0.3 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5
-0.6
-0.3
0.0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.5
P700
P600 P500 P400
P300
log
qe
log Ce
HC
b
C samples generated at temperatures ranging from 300 �C to
634 C A R B O N 7 7 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 6 2 7 – 6 3 6
adsorption capacity between different samples, the KF and
Qe20 (taken from the adsorption isotherm at a constant TC
equilibrium concentration of 20 mg/L) were plotted against
the various properties of the samples, including the H/C,
O/C and (O + N)/C atomic ratios, surface area, total pore vol-
ume and micropore volume (Fig. 6 and Fig. S5). Thus, under
a given activation condition, the adsorption parameters could
be used to estimate the activation temperature of hydrochar
[8].
As shown in Fig. 6, a linear decrease in the KF value as a
function of H/C, O/C, (O + N)/C atomic ratios was obtained,
whereas a linear increase in the KF value as a function of the
surface area, total pore volume and micropore volume was
achieved (resulting from the pore-filling effect). Correspond-
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0
2
4
6
8
K F (m
g1-n Ln /g
)
P700
P600
P500
P400
P300
H/C Atomic Ratio
y=-13.88x+12.32R2=0.94
HC
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3
0
2
4
6
8
K F (m
g1-n Ln /g
)
P700
P600
P500
P400
(O+N)/C Atomic Ratio
HC
P300
y=-26.11x+8.95R2=0.96
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25
0
2
4
6
8
K F (m
g1-n Ln /g
)
P700P600
P500
P400
P300
Total Pore Volume (cm3/g)
HC
y=40.37x-2.06R2=0.92
Fig. 6 – Correlation between Freundlich adsorptive capacity (KF)
atomic ratio, surface area, the total pore volume and the microp
temperatures ranging from 300 �C to 700 �C.
ingly, the polarity (O/C and (O + N)/C atomic ratios) was the
best for correlation with the KF value (R2 = 0.96). It should be
emphasized that TC is bulky molecule and, as expected,
induced a marked size-exclusion effect when adsorbing on
carbonaceous material [6]. Accordingly, the micropore volume
was the worst for correlation with the KF value (R2 = 0.87).
To further elucidate the TC adsorption, the Qe20 value was
also correlated with the properties of the samples, as shown
in Fig. S5. A negative correlation between the Qe20 values
and aromaticity index (H/C ratios) was observed, suggesting
that EDA interaction could occur between the PC sample
and the TC molecule. TC molecules are strong p-acceptors,
due to their ketone functional groups; and, a high-
temperature PC sample can act as a p-donor, due to graphitic
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3
0
2
4
6
8
K F (m
g1-n Ln /g
)
P700
P600
P500
P400
P300
O/C Atomic Ratio
y=-26.53x+8.59R2=0.96
HC
0 75 150 225 300
0
2
4
6
8P700
P600
P500
P400
P300
K F (m
g1-n Ln /g
)
Surface Area (BET, m2/g)
HC
y=0.02x-0.04R2=0.91
0.00 0.04 0.08 0.12
0
2
4
6
8
K F (m
g1-n Ln /g
)
P700P600
P500P400
P300
Micropore Volume (cm3/g)
HC
y=-50.77x+0.76R2=0.87
and the H/C atomic ratio, the O/C atomic ratio, the (O + N)/C
ore volume of raw hydrochar and PC samples generated at
C A R B O N 7 7 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 6 2 7 – 6 3 6 635
carbon. However, the large amount of carboxyl groups in raw
hydrochar and low-temperature PC samples, such as P300,
also can act as p-acceptors [6,39]. Consequently, a stronger
EDA interaction occurred between the TC molecule (p-accep-
tor) and a high-temperature PC sample (p-donor) than with
low-temperature PC samples.
A negative correlation between Qe20 values and polarity
index (O/C atomic ratios) was also observed, which indicated
that the TC adsorption increased with a decrease in the polar-
ity of the PC samples. Hence, higher polar functional groups
in a PC sample may have inhibited TC adsorption, due to
the formation of larger and denser water molecule clusters
as a result of hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interaction
playing an important role during the TC adsorption [39].
High surface areas and pore volumes of carbonaceous
material generally promote organic matter adsorption, due
to the pronounced pore-filling effect. Accordingly, a positive
correlation was obtained between the Qe20 values and the sur-
face area, with similar trends was observed for total pore vol-
ume and micropore volume. Interestingly, the total pore
volume was the best for correlation with the Qe20, rather than
the micropore volume. This can be attributed to the TC mol-
ecules exhibiting a size-exclusion effect due to their relatively
large size.
A similar result was observed in the correlation analysis of
the KF value. The properties of the PC samples influenced by
the activation temperature further affected their adsorption
behaviors. Overall, with increasing activation temperatures,
the increase of aromaticity, surface area and pore volume
and decrease of polarity of samples were observed, and ulti-
mately promoted the adsorption capacities for the removal
of TC.
4. Conclusions
The results from this study indicate that hydrochar derived
from the HTC of waste biomass can be converted into porous
carbon (PC) that shows promise as an adsorbent for the
removal of environmental antibiotics, implying that hydro-
char can potentially serve as a remediation agent.
In the present study, it was shown that the properties and
adsorption behaviors of hydrochar-derived PC depended
strongly on the formation conditions. The results indicated
increases in pH, ash contents, surface area, pore volume,
and aromaticity and a decrease in polarity of PC sample pro-
duced at high temperature. The PC samples obtained at high
temperature were well carbonized and showed a relatively
high adsorption capacity in removing TC from an aqueous
solution. Further, good correlations between adsorption
capacity and aromaticity index (H/C), polarity index (O/C,
(O + N)/C) and porosity (surface area, total pore volume and
micropore volume) were observed.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful for the financial support from the
Shanghai Science and Technology Committee. The authors
also thank the anonymous reviewers for fruitful suggestions.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found,
in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.
2014.05.067.
R E F E R E N C E S
[1] Sevilla M, Fuertes A, Mokaya R. High density hydrogenstorage in superactivated carbons from hydrothermallycarbonized renewable organic materials. Energy Environ Sci2011;4:1400–10.
[2] Libra JA, Ro KS, Kammann C, Funke A, Berge ND, Neubauer Y,et al. Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residuals: acomparative review of the chemistry, processes andapplications of wet and dry pyrolysis. Biofuels 2011;2:71–106.
[3] Titirici M-M, White RJ, Falco C, Sevilla M. Black perspectivesfor a green future: hydrothermal carbons for environmentprotection and energy storage. Energy Environ Sci2012;5:6796–822.
[4] Falco C, Marco-Lozar J, Salinas-Torres D, Morallon E, Cazorla-Amoros D, Titirici M, et al. Tailoring the porosity ofchemically activated hydrothermal carbons: influence of theprecursor and hydrothermal carbonization temperature.Carbon 2013;62:346–55.
[5] Sun Y, Gao B, Yao Y, Fang J, Zhang M, Zhou Y, et al. Effects offeedstock type, production method, and pyrolysistemperature on biochar and hydrochar properties. Chem EngJ 2014;156:243–9.
[6] Ji L, Wan Y, Zheng S, Zhu D. Adsorption of tetracycline andsulfamethoxazole on crop residue-derived ashes: implicationfor the relative importance of black carbon to soil sorption.Environ Sci Technol 2011;45:5580–6.
[7] Jia M, Wang F, Bian Y, Jin X, Song Y, Kengara FO, et al. Effectsof pH and metal ions on oxytetracycline sorption to maize–straw-derived biochar. Bioresour Technol 2013;136:87–93.
[8] Chen B, Zhou D, Zhu L. Transitional adsorption and partitionof nonpolar and polar aromatic contaminants by biochars ofpine needles with different pyrolytic temperatures. EnvironSci Technol 2008;42:5137–43.
[9] Wang YJ, Jia DA, Sun RJ, Zhu HW, Zhou DM. Adsorption andcosorption of tetracycline and copper (II) on montmorilloniteas affected by solution pH. Environ Sci Technol2008;42:3254–9.
[10] Zhu XD, Wang YJ, Sun RJ, Zhou DM. Photocatalyticdegradation of tetracycline in aqueous solution by nanosizedTiO2. Chemosphere 2013;92:925–32.
[11] Liu P, Liu WJ, Jiang H, Chen JJ, Li WW, Yu HQ. Modification ofbio-char derived from fast pyrolysis of biomass and itsapplication in removal of tetracycline from aqueous solution.Bioresour Technol 2012;121:235–40.
[12] Toor SS, Reddy H, Deng S, Hoffmann J, Spangsmark D,Madsen LB, et al. Hydrothermal liquefaction of Spirulina andNannochloropsis salina under subcritical and supercriticalwater conditions. Bioresour Technol 2013;131:413–9.
[13] Yuan J-H, Xu R-K, Zhang H. The forms of alkalis in thebiochar produced from crop residues at differenttemperatures. Bioresour Technol 2011;102:3488–97.
[14] Ahmad M, Lee SS, Dou X, Mohan D, Sung JK, Yang JE, et al.Effects of pyrolysis temperature on soybean stover-andpeanut shell-derived biochar properties and TCE adsorptionin water. Bioresour Technol 2012;118:536–44.
[15] Chun Y, Sheng G, Chiou CT, Xing B. Compositions andsorptive properties of crop residue-derived chars. Environ SciTechnol 2004;38:4649–55.
636 C A R B O N 7 7 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 6 2 7 – 6 3 6
[16] Wang YJ, Jia DA, Sun RJ, Zhu HW, Zhou DM. Adsorption andcosorption of tetracycline and copper(II) on montmorilloniteas affected by solution pH. Environ Sci Technol2008;42:3254–9.
[17] Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Zheng C, Lee DH, Liang DT. In-depthinvestigation of biomass pyrolysis based on three majorcomponents: hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin. EnergyFuels 2006;20:388–93.
[18] Fuertes A, Arbestain MC, Sevilla M, Macia-Agullo J, Fiol S,Lopez R, et al. Chemical and structural properties ofcarbonaceous products obtained by pyrolysis andhydrothermal carbonisation of corn stover. Soil Res2010;48:618–26.
[19] Al-Wabel MI, Al-Omran A, El-Naggar AH, Nadeem M,Usman AR. Pyrolysis temperature induced changes incharacteristics and chemical composition of biocharproduced from conocarpus wastes. Bioresour Technol2013;131:374–9.
[20] Boehm HP. Surface oxides on carbon and their analysis: acritical assessment. Carbon 2002;40:145–9.
[21] Keiluweit M, Nico PS, Johnson MG, Kleber M. Dynamicmolecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon(biochar). Environ Sci Technol 2010;44:1247–53.
[22] Roman S, Valente Nabais J, Ledesma B, Gonzalez J, LaginhasC, Titirici M. Production of low-cost adsorbents with tunablesurface chemistry by conjunction of hydrothermalcarbonization and activation processes. MicroporousMesoporous Mater 2012;165:127–33.
[23] Brunauer S, Deming LS, Deming WE, Teller E. On a theory ofthe van der Waals adsorption of gases. J Am Chem Soc1940;62:1723–32.
[24] Sevilla M, Fuertes AB. The production of carbon materials byhydrothermal carbonization of cellulose. Carbon2009;47:2281–9.
[25] Liu Z, Zhang F-S. Removal of copper (II) and phenol fromaqueous solution using porous carbons derived fromhydrothermal chars. Desalination 2011;267:101–6.
[26] Ahmad M, Lee SS, Rajapaksha AU, Vithanage M, Zhang M,Cho JS, et al. Trichloroethylene adsorption by pine needlebiochars produced at various pyrolysis temperatures.Bioresour Technol 2013;143:615–22.
[27] Cao X, Ma L, Liang Y, Gao B, Harris W. Simultaneousimmobilization of lead and atrazine in contaminated soilsusing dairy-manure biochar. Environ Sci Technol2011;45:4884–9.
[28] Nanda S, Mohanty P, Pant KK, Naik S, Kozinski JA, Dalai AK.Characterization of north American lignocellulosic biomassand biochars in terms of their candidacy for alternaterenewable fuels. BioEnergy Res 2013;6:663–77.
[29] Chen Z, Chen B, Chiou CT. Fast and slow rates of naphthalenesorption to biochars produced at different temperatures.Environ Sci Technol 2012;46:11104–11.
[30] Uchimiya M, Wartelle LH, Klasson KT, Fortier CA, Lima IM.Influence of pyrolysis temperature on biochar property andfunction as a heavy metal sorbent in soil. Agric Food Chem2011;59:2501–10.
[31] Kloss S, Zehetner F, Dellantonio A, Hamid R, Ottner F, LiedtkeV, et al. Characterization of slow pyrolysis biochars: effectsof feedstocks and pyrolysis temperature on biocharproperties. Environ Qual 2012;41:990–1000.
[32] Millan A. Crystal growth shape of whewellite polymorphs:influence of structure distortions on crystal shape. CrystGrowth Des 2001;1:245–54.
[33] Yu L, Falco C, Weber J, White RJ, Howe JY, Titirici M-M.Carbohydrate-derived hydrothermal carbons: a thoroughcharacterization study. Langmuir 2012;28:12373–83.
[34] Wiedner K, Naisse C, Rumpel C, Pozzi A, Wieczorek P, GlaserB. Chemical modification of biomass residues duringhydrothermal carbonization-what makes the difference,temperature or feedstock? Organic Geochem 2012;54:91–100.
[35] Aydıncak K, Yumak Tr, Sınag A, Esen B. Synthesis andcharacterization of carbonaceous materials from saccharides(glucose and lactose) and two waste biomasses byhydrothermal carbonization. Ind Eng Chem Res2012;51:9145–52.
[36] McBeath AV, Smernik RJ, Schneider MP, Schmidt MW, PlantEL. Determination of the aromaticity and the degree ofaromatic condensation of a thermosequence of woodcharcoal using NMR. Organic Geochem 2011;42:1194–202.
[37] Kim W-K, Shim T, Kim Y-S, Hyun S, Ryu C, Park Y-K, et al.Characterization of cadmium removal from aqueous solutionby biochar produced from a giant Miscanthus at differentpyrolytic temperatures. Bioresour Technol 2013;138:266–70.
[38] Ji L, Chen W, Duan L, Zhu D. Mechanisms for strongadsorption of tetracycline to carbon nanotubes: acomparative study using activated carbon and graphite asadsorbents. Environ Sci Technol 2009;43:2322–7.
[39] Zheng H, Wang Z, Zhao J, Herbert S, Xing B. Sorption ofantibiotic sulfamethoxazole varies with biochars produced atdifferent temperatures. Environ Pollut 2013;181:60–7.