a new code for axisymmetric numerical relativity eric hircshmann, byu steve liebling, liu frans...

64
A New Code for Axisymmetric Numerical Relativity Eric Hircshmann, BYU Steve Liebling, LIU Frans Pretorius, UBC Matthew Choptuik CIAR/UBC Black Holes III Kananaskis, Alberta May 22, 2001

Upload: logan-wade

Post on 29-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

A New Code for Axisymmetric Numerical Relativity

Eric Hircshmann, BYUSteve Liebling, LIU

Frans Pretorius, UBCMatthew Choptuik CIAR/UBC

Black Holes IIIKananaskis, Alberta

May 22, 2001

2

Outline

• Motivation• Previous Work (other axisymmetric codes)• Formalism & equations of motion• Numerical considerations• Early results• Black hole excision results• Adaptive mesh refinement results• Future work

3

Motivation

• Construct accurate, robust code for axisymmetric calculations in GR

• Full 3D calculations still require more computer resources than typically available (especially in Canada!)

• Interesting calculations to be done!

4

Long Term Goals

• Critical Phenomena

– Test non-linear stability of known spherical solutions

– Look for new solutions with new matter sources

– Study effects of rotation

– Repeat Abrahams & Evans gravitational-wave collapse calculations with higher resolution

5

Long Term Goals

• Cosmic Censorship

– Reexamine Shapiro & Teukolsky computations suggesting naked singularity formation in highly prolate collapse but using matter with better convergence properties

• ??? (“Expect the Unexpected”)

6

Development of Techniques & Algorithms for General Use

• Coordinate choices (lapse and shift)

• Black hole excision techniques

• Adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) algorithms

7

Previous Work (“Space + Time” Approaches)

• NCSA / Wash U / Potsdam … (Smarr & Eppley (1978), Hobill, Seidel, Bernstein, Brandt …)

– Focused on head-on black hole collisions using “boundary conforming” (Cadez) coordinates

– Culminates in work by Brandt & Anninos (98-99); head-on collisions of different-massed black holes, estimation of recoil due to gravity-wave emission

8

Previous Work

• Nakamura & collaborators (early 80’s)

– Rotating collapse of perfect fluid using (2+1)+1 approach

• Stark & Piran (mid 80’s)

– Rotating collapse of perfect fluid, relatively accurate determination of emitted gravitational wave-forms

9

Previous Work

• Cornell Group (Shapiro,Teukolsky, Abrahams, Cook …)

– Studied variety of problems in late 80’s through early 90’s using non-interacting particles as matter source

• FOUND EVIDENCE FOR NAKED SINGULARITY FORMATION IN SUFFICIENTLY PROLATE COLLAPSE

10

Previous Work

• Evans, (84-), Abrahams and Evans (-93)

– Began as code for general relativistic hydrodynamics

– Later specialized to vacuum collapse (Brill waves)

• STUDIED CRITICAL COLLAPSE OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVES; FOUND EVIDENCE FOR SCALING & UNIVERSALITY (93)

11

Problems With Axisymmetry

• Most codes used polar/spherical coordinates

• Severe difficulties with regularity at coordinate singularities: , but especially -axis

• Long-time evolutions difficult due to resulting instabilities

• MAJOR MOTIVATION FOR SUSPENSION OF 2D STUDIES IN MID-90’s

0r z

12

Formalism

• Adopt a (2+1)+1 decomposition; dimensional reduction --- divide out the action of the Killing vector (Geroch)

• Gravitational degrees of freedom in 2+1 space

– Scalar:

– Twist vector: (ONE dynamical degree of freedom)

2es

aw

13

Formalism

• Have not incorporated rotation yet (no twist vector); in this case easy to relate (2+1)+1 equations to “usual” 3+1 form

• Adopt cylindrical coordinates

• No dependence of any quantities on

),,,( zt

14

Geometry

• all functions of ),,( zt

])(

)[(2222

24222

dedtdz

dtddtdsz

),,,,( z

15

Geometry

• Coordinate conditions

– Diagonal 2-metric

– Maximal slicing

• Kinematical variables:

• Dynamical variables:

0)3( K

),,( z

Conjugate to

),,(

16

Matter

• Single minimally coupled massless scalar field,

• Also introduce conjugate variable

),,( zt

0

gT 2

),,( zt

17

Evolution Scheme

• Evolution equations for

• “Constraint” equations for

• Also have evolution equation for which is used at times

• Compute and monitor ADM mass

),,,(

),,,( z

18

Regularity Conditions

• As , all functions either go as

or

• Regularity EXPLICITLY enforced

0

)(),(),(),,( 42

20 Oztfztfztf

)(),(),(),,( 53

31 Oztgztgztg

19

Boundary Conditions

• Numerical domain is FINITE

• Impose naïve outgoing radiation conditions on evolved variables,

• Conditions based on asymptotic flatness and leading order behaviour used for “constrained” variables

222,, 0)()( zrfrfr rt

),,( ztf

r

20

Initial Data

• Freely specify evolved quantities

• Solve “constraints” for

),,,(

),,,( z

21

Numerical Approach

• Use uniform grid in

• Grid includes

• Use finite-difference formulae (mostly centred difference approximations)

),,( zt

2/1 hthz

)( 2hO

0

22

Numerical Approach

• Use “iterative Crank-Nicholson” to update evolved variables

• Use multi-grid to solve coupled elliptic equations for , based on point-wise simultaneous relaxation of all four variables

• Still have some problems with multi-grid in strong Brill collapse; using evolution equation for helps

),,,( z

23

Dissipation

• Add explicit dissipation of “Kreiss-Oliger” form to differenced evolution equations

• Scheme remains (second order), but high-frequency components are effectively damped

• CRUCIAL for controlling instabilities, particularly along -axis

)( 2hO

z

24

Kreiss-Oliger Dissipation: Example

• Consider the simple “advection” equation

• Finite difference via and

x

uu

t

uu nj

nj

nj

nj

2211

11

uu xt

),( xjtnuunj

25

Kreiss-Oliger Dissipation: Example

• Add “Kreiss-Oliger” dissipation via

• Where and

421124 464

x

uuuuuuD

nj

nj

nj

nj

njn

j

1441

161

n

jnj uDxu

10

26

Effect of Dissipation65 x 129 Grid

27

Effect of Dissipation65 x 129 Grid

28

Effect of Dissipation65 x 129 Grid

29

Effect of Dissipation129 x 257 grid

30

Effect of Dissipation129 x 257 grid

31

Effect of Dissipation129 x 257 grid

32

Effect of Dissipation127 x 259 grid

33

Collapse of Oblate and Prolate Scalar Pulses

),,( zt

34

Collapse of Oblate and Prolate Scalar Pulses

),,( zt

35

Collapse of Weak Brill Waves

),,( zt

36

Collapse of Weak Brill Waves

),,( zt

37

Collapse of Asymmetric Scalar Pulses

),,( zt

38

Collapse of Asymmetric Scalar Pulses

),,( zt

39

Convergence

40

Black Hole Excision

• To avoid singularity within black hole, exclude interior of hole from computational domain (Unruh)

• Operationally, track some surface(s) interior to apparent horizon(s)

• Currently fix excision surface by scanning level contours of a priori specified function and choosing surface on which outgoing divergence of null rays is sufficiently negative

41

Close Merger of Two Scalar Pulses with Excision

),,( zt

42

Asymmetric Scalar Collapse with Excision

),,( zt

43

Asymmetric Scalar Collapse with Excision

),,( zt

44

Boosted Merger of Two Scalar Pulses with Excision

),,( zt

45

Boosted Merger of Two Scalar Pulses with Excision

),,( zt

46

Boosted Merger of Two Scalar Pulses with Excision

),,( zt

47

“Waveform Extraction”

48

Black Hole & Brill Wave with Excision

),,( zt

49

Black Hole & Brill Wave with Excision

24

2 ),,( ztr

50

Black Hole & Brill Wave with Excision

2

04

~),,~(

tdztrt

51

Highly Prolate Scalar Collapse With Excision

),,( zt

52

Highly Prolate Scalar Collapse With Excision

),,( zt

53

Highly Prolate Scalar Collapse With Excision

),,(4 ztr

54

Adaptive Mesh Refinement

• After stability, adequate resolution is THE KEY to successful solution of time-dependent PDEs

• Problems of interest to us exhibit enormous dynamical range; adaptive mesh refinement essential (arguably more important than parallelization)

• Current approach based on Berger & Oliger algorithm (84), follows work done in 1d, and modules from Binary BH Grand Challenge

55

AMR Results: Initial Data3 Levels of 4:1 Refinement

),,0( z

56

AMR Results: Initial Data3 Levels of 4:1 Refinement

),,0( zz

57

AMR Results: Initial Data3 Levels of 4:1 Refinement

58

AMR Results: Intermediate Strength Asymmetric Pulses(5 Levels of 2:1 Refinement)

59

AMR Results: Intermediate Strength Symmetric Pulses

),,( zt

60

AMR Results: Intermediate Strength Symmetric Pulses

),,( ztr

61

AMR Results: Intermediate Strength Asymmetric Pulses

),,( ztr

62

AMR Results: Intermediate Strength Asymmetric Pulses

),,( ztr

63

Future Work

• AMR current focus; needed for virtually all long-term goals of project

• Once fully implemented, will investigate various issues in critical collapse, highly prolate collapse etc., using scalar fields and gravitational waves

• Plan to add Maxwell field shortly, collapse of strong EM fields essentially unstudied

64

Future Work

• Will continue to work on excision techniques and head-on collisions of black holes, and other compact objects (e.g. boson stars)

• Will add rotation, study effect on critical collapse of complex scalar fields, EM field

• Longer term---will incorporate relativistic hydrodynamics