a new approach – portfolio of initiatives

2
 A New Ap proach   Portfolio of Initiatives  Improving student success requires cohesive and well-aligned approach that is goal oriented and result driven. Isolated efforts, however  well intentioned, do not result in making significant impr ovements in retention and graduation rates. Identified as superior to a typical strategic plan for PSU’s purposes, the  Portfolio-of-Initiatives framework was chosen to develop strategy, implement ideas and improve exe cution. This framework was developed by McKin sey director Lowell Bryan, as a way to develop strategy in a dynamic and unpredictable environment, and incorporates Hugh Courtney’s ideas for developing strategy under uncertainty. In our implementation of portfolio of initiatives we not only used the suggested notions of familiarity (or the ability to act) and time horizon to prioritize projects, we also introduced t he presence of “champions” (motivation and imag ination) in establishing risk or choosing a project. Using a Portfolio-of-Initiatives approach requires:   A disciplined search for a variety of in itiatives with the highest possibility of success.  Rigorous monitoring of projects and sub-projects, with a focus on action.  Supporting the champions.  Scaling up successful projects, winding down unsuccessful projects and changing course when needed. In general the Portfolio-of-Initiatives Approach increases the likelihood of accomplishing stated goals by first exploring possible outcomes through diagnosis and design, testing proposals with experimentation and finally implementing proposals “just -in-time” to achieve maximum potential success through unders tanding associated risks and rewards. An important element in this process is the organization’s ability to abandon potentially risky pro posals or shift focus as revelations come to li ght. Continuous monitoring and transparenc y are also essential. Although this sort of approach is intended to be long-term in nature, smaller, more fami liar initiatives can be implemented as soon as the first two stages are complete.  Additional R eadings  The portfolio of initiatives. (2009). McKinsey Quart erly , (3), 144.  A fresh look at strategy under uncertainty: An interv iew. (2009).  McKinsey Quart erly , (1), 43-46 Courtney, H. (2001). Making the most of uncertainty.  Mckinsey Quart erly , (4), 38-47. Courtney, H., Kirkland, J., & Viguerie, P. (1997). Strategy Under Uncertainty. Harvard Business Review , 75 (6), 67-79.

Upload: prof-sukhwant-jhaj

Post on 04-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

 

 A New Approach  – Portfolio of Initiatives Improving student success requires cohesive and well-aligned approach that is goal oriented and result driven. Isolated efforts, however well intentioned, do not result in making significant improvements in retention and graduation rates.

Identified as superior to a typical strategic plan for PSU’s purposes, the Portfolio-of-Initiatives framework was chosen to develop strategy,implement ideas and improve execution. This framework was developed by McKinsey director Lowell Bryan, as a way to develop strategy in a dynamic and unpredictable environment, and incorporates Hugh Courtney’s ideas for developing strategy  under uncertainty. In ourimplementation of portfolio of initiatives we not only used the suggested notions of familiarity (or the ability to act) and time horizon toprioritize projects, we also introduced the presence of “champions” (motivation and imag ination) in establishing risk or choosing a project.

Using a Portfolio-of-Initiatives approach requires:

   A disciplined search for a variety of initiatives with the highest possibility of success.

  Rigorous monitoring of projects and sub-projects, with a focus on action.

  Supporting the champions.

  Scaling up successful projects, winding down unsuccessful projects and changing course when needed.

In general the Portfolio-of-Initiatives Approach increases the likelihood of accomplishing stated goals by first exploring possible outcomesthrough diagnosis and design, testing proposals with experimentation and finally implementing proposals “just -in-time” to achievemaximum potential success through understanding associated risks and rewards. An important element in this process is the organization’sability to abandon potentially risky proposals or shift focus as revelations come to light. Continuous monitoring and transparency are alsoessential. Although this sort of approach is intended to be long-term in nature, smaller, more familiar initiatives can be implemented assoon as the first two stages are complete.

 Additional Readings  The portfolio of initiatives. (2009). McKinsey Quarterly , (3), 144.

 A fresh look at strategy under uncertainty: An interview. (2009).  McKinsey Quarterly , (1), 43-46

Courtney, H. (2001). Making the most of uncertainty.  Mckinsey Quarterly , (4), 38-47.

Courtney, H., Kirkland, J., & Viguerie, P. (1997). Strategy Under Uncertainty. Harvard Business Review , 75 (6), 67-79.

 

PSU Student Success Portfolio of Initiatives, Project Impact.

   P   R   O   J   E   C   T   R   I   S   K

Familiar 1 2 3

Unfamiliar4 5 6

Uncertain 7 8 9

Projects in Experimental Phase Projects in Exploratory PhaseProjects in Exploratory Phase  –  

Longer TermPROJECT TIMING

EarlyIdentification

System

MathPlacement 

Last Mile

 

WritingAssessment 

ApplicationDeadline

AcademicPoliciesReview

DegreeMaps withMilestones

StudentSuccessCenter

Communicationwith Students

(CRM)

AdmissionMatrix

Redesign

Student Success

Data

Student Prep

TimelyProgress toGraduation

¡Éxito!

FRINQ + FYECollaboration

 

High RiskCourse

Redesign

FallRegistration

Project 

UnifiedAdvisingRecords

FreshmenCommunication

Plan

AmeriCorpsMentor

Retention

FreshmanRetention

Project 

Students’

FinancialConcerns

Transitionto College