a method for evaluating personal protective equipment technique by healthcare workers

18
Elizabeth Beam, RN, MSN UNMC College of Nursing Special thanks to Dr. Gibbs, Kate Boulter, Marcia Beckerdite, and Dr. Philip Smith MD

Upload: ally

Post on 27-Jan-2016

32 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Elizabeth Beam, RN, MSN UNMC College of Nursing Special thanks to Dr. Gibbs, Kate Boulter, Marcia Beckerdite, and Dr. Philip Smith MD. A Method for Evaluating Personal Protective Equipment Technique by Healthcare Workers. The plan. Key concepts in PPE for healthcare. Describe study. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Method for Evaluating Personal Protective Equipment Technique by Healthcare Workers

Elizabeth Beam, RN, MSN

UNMC College of Nursing

Special thanks to Dr. Gibbs, Kate Boulter, Marcia Beckerdite, and Dr. Philip Smith MD

Page 2: A Method for Evaluating Personal Protective Equipment Technique by Healthcare Workers

The plan

Key concepts in PPE for healthcare. Describe study. Results and discussion. Future directions. Questions? If time…video review simulation.

Page 3: A Method for Evaluating Personal Protective Equipment Technique by Healthcare Workers

Key concepts in personal protection for healthcare… Proper order for donning PPE What PPE to wear

ContactContact & DropletContact & Airborne

How to protect yourself while in the patient room

Proper order for doffing PPE

Page 4: A Method for Evaluating Personal Protective Equipment Technique by Healthcare Workers

A pilot study… A study was conducted to examine the

feasibility of employing a simulated healthcare environment to assess the technique of healthcare workers in the use of standard airborne and contact isolation precautions without the potential for harm to real patients.

Powdered fluorescent marker tracking and digital video recording were used to assess compliance with current guidelines.

An expanded research study will be needed to further examine these commonly noted contamination and exposure pathways.

Page 5: A Method for Evaluating Personal Protective Equipment Technique by Healthcare Workers

Simulation suite…

Page 6: A Method for Evaluating Personal Protective Equipment Technique by Healthcare Workers

Faking it…

Page 7: A Method for Evaluating Personal Protective Equipment Technique by Healthcare Workers

Glowing germs…

Page 8: A Method for Evaluating Personal Protective Equipment Technique by Healthcare Workers

Guidelines…

Centers for Disease Controlhttp://www.cdc.gov/HAI/prevent/ppe.html

World Health Organizationhttp://www.who.int/csr/resources/publication

s/WHO_CDS_HSE_2008_2/en/index.html

Page 9: A Method for Evaluating Personal Protective Equipment Technique by Healthcare Workers

Scenarios… Registered Nurses hung an intravenous

(IV) medication (IV line into bag under gown) and performed a head-to-toe assessment on the patient.

Respiratory Therapists assessed the patient and administered a nebulizer treatment (saline only).

Nursing Technicians repositioned the patient from bed to chair, took vital signs, and conducted input and output assessment.

Page 10: A Method for Evaluating Personal Protective Equipment Technique by Healthcare Workers

Poster used in study…

Color copies Posted at donning

and doffing areas.

Page 11: A Method for Evaluating Personal Protective Equipment Technique by Healthcare Workers

Summary of study design… Simulation Room Cameras (in room, outside room) Simulated Patient (yours truly) Glo Germ Job-specific procedures (simulated)

Nurse: IV medRT: Nebulizer treatmentPatient care tech: Reposition, I & 0, VS

Randomized: Guideline poster available

Page 12: A Method for Evaluating Personal Protective Equipment Technique by Healthcare Workers

Participants:

Healthcare workers (n=10) Convenience sample Good skill mix (med-surg, ICU, ER, etc.) Had experience with simulation Multiple genders, roles, etc.

Page 13: A Method for Evaluating Personal Protective Equipment Technique by Healthcare Workers

Video Results… Each of the 10 participants committed at least one

breach of standard airborne and contact isolation precautions

Donning: Most common: not conducting a seal check on the

respirator, failing to tie the gown at both the neck and the waist, and improper sequence.

Doffing: Most common: improper sequence, the method for

removing the respirator, and removing potentially contaminated items from the room.

In room: Touching self with dirty gloves. Touching surfaces in room for no apparent reason.

Page 14: A Method for Evaluating Personal Protective Equipment Technique by Healthcare Workers

Glo germ results…

Glo Germ noted with UV light and digital photographs taken:Contamination noted in 8 of the 10

participants.6 hand area; 3 back of head.One had contamination on both their hands

and their head.

Page 15: A Method for Evaluating Personal Protective Equipment Technique by Healthcare Workers

Discussion…

Our study was not large enough to determine if poster impacted behavior, but…

Is it Glo Germ or is it paper towel debris?

Video capture: Good quality. Interesting data. Camera position matters.

Simulation lab vs. regular hospital room with mounted digital cameras?

Page 16: A Method for Evaluating Personal Protective Equipment Technique by Healthcare Workers

Dissemination…

Beam, E., Gibbs, S., Boulter, K., Beckerdite, M., & Smith, P. (2011). A method for evaluating personal protective equipment technique by healthcare workers. American Journal of Infection Control, 39, 415-420.

Page 17: A Method for Evaluating Personal Protective Equipment Technique by Healthcare Workers

Future directions…

“Body of Work” creates questions:What are the common errors?Are there facility-specific errors?Do physical characteristics matter?Why are the poor behaviors seen?What are the beliefs among healthcare

workers about PPE?Could reflective practice improve

performance?

Page 18: A Method for Evaluating Personal Protective Equipment Technique by Healthcare Workers

Video Record Patient Care

Review video with

‘Think Aloud’

Recording

+

Simulation Experience:

Sequential Explanatory Design: Simulation will be reviewed and scored (as perBeam, et al., 2011). Think Aloud recordings will be qualitatively analyzed (Max QDA).

Long Term Follow Up (at One Month): Interview asking about change in practice.

Population: Registered Nurses expected to care for patients in isolation in the hospital.Sample Size: Minimum 30.Pre-simulation data: Collect demographic information, occupational history,and physical characteristics/flexibility assessment.

Mixed Methods Study InvestigatingInfection Control Behavior