a lee, e o ’ loughlin, lj roberts

14
DREAMFASTA Double-blind Randomized Evaluation of Alfentanil and Morphine versus Fentanyl: Analgesia and Sleep Trial A Lee, E O’Loughlin, LJ Roberts

Upload: almira

Post on 23-Feb-2016

41 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

‘ DREAMFAST ’ A Double-blind Randomized Evaluation of Alfentanil and Morphine versus Fentanyl: Analgesia and Sleep Trial. A Lee, E O ’ Loughlin, LJ Roberts. Background. Patients using PCA fentanyl report awakening due to pain. Background. Patients using PCA fentanyl report awakening - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Lee, E O ’ Loughlin, LJ Roberts

‘DREAMFAST’A Double-blind Randomized Evaluation of Alfentanil and Morphine versus Fentanyl: Analgesia

and Sleep Trial

A Lee, E O’Loughlin, LJ Roberts

Page 2: A Lee, E O ’ Loughlin, LJ Roberts

Background Patients using PCA fentanyl report

awakening due to pain

Page 3: A Lee, E O ’ Loughlin, LJ Roberts

Background Patients using PCA fentanyl report

awakening due to pain

Alfentanil and morphine combination PACU: shorter time to patient comfort than

morphine(Ludbrook et al 2001)

PCA: more rapid onset than morphine(Ngan Kee et al 1999)

Page 4: A Lee, E O ’ Loughlin, LJ Roberts

Hypothesis

Primary aim To determine that an alfentanil/morphine

combination used in PCA reduces pain-related sleep disturbance when compared to fentanyl PCA

Secondary aims Safety and efficacy of alfentanil/morphine PCA Sleep in the postoperative period

Page 5: A Lee, E O ’ Loughlin, LJ Roberts

Methods Double blind, randomized trial

Group AM: alfentanil 75mcg/morphine 1mg Group F: fentanyl 20mcg

Pilot study: 88 patients per group required Adult ASA 1-3 patients Exclusion criteria Randomization Anaesthesia

Page 6: A Lee, E O ’ Loughlin, LJ Roberts

Methods Daily Pain Team review Rescue protocol

First-line: 50% dose increase Second-line: addition of ketamine infusion

Data collection 2nd post-operative morning St Mary’s Hospital Sleep Questionnaire PCA data: VAS, rescue analgesia, PONV, itch

Statistical analysis Intention to treat t-tests, Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests

Page 7: A Lee, E O ’ Loughlin, LJ Roberts

Results212 enrolled

206 randomized

Group AM n = 102

Primary outcome data

n = 90

Group F n = 104

Primary outcome data

n = 85

6 excluded

Page 8: A Lee, E O ’ Loughlin, LJ Roberts

Results: Pain-related Sleep Disruption

p = 0.40

Page 9: A Lee, E O ’ Loughlin, LJ Roberts

Results: Sleep Disruption

Page 10: A Lee, E O ’ Loughlin, LJ Roberts

Results: Causes of Sleep Disruption

23%

49%

6%

22%

Group AM

Page 11: A Lee, E O ’ Loughlin, LJ Roberts

Results: Analgesia Efficacy

Group AM

Group F p

VRS Day 1* 2 (0-8) 3 (0-8) 0.003

VRS Day 2* 1 (0-8) 2 (0-7) 0.13

Dose increase (%)

5 13 0.054

Ketamine added (%)

2 14 0.001

VRS = Verbal Rating Scale; * median (range)

Page 12: A Lee, E O ’ Loughlin, LJ Roberts

Results: Side Effects No cases of significant sedation or

respiratory depression in either group

Group AM Had a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting

(18% vs. 35%, p=0.015) Reported more itch (35% vs. 19%, p=0.017)

Page 13: A Lee, E O ’ Loughlin, LJ Roberts

Discussion Alfentanil/morphine did not reduce pain-

related awakenings by 50% Alfentanil/morphine may provide more

effective analgesia than fentanyl Limitations

Powered to detect a 50% or greater reduction in sleep disruption

Sleep disruption is subjective Reliance on retrospective recall

Trial protocol reflects realistic postoperative management

Page 14: A Lee, E O ’ Loughlin, LJ Roberts

Conclusions

Postoperative sleep disruption is common and multifactorial

The alfentanil/morphine combination in PCA did not reduce pain-related awakenings by more than 50%

The alfentanil/morphine combination in PCA was associated with better analgesia