a kyushu 0.2 kyushu university ** university *** naro … · 2017-12-12 · 2 0 4h++o higher i...
TRANSCRIPT
No LED treatment(NL) No LED unit was applied
PPFD in Pulsed LED (PL) was 1/2 compared with in Continuous LED (CL)
a
b
a
b
PLCL
・Introduction
Strawberry(Fragaria × ananassa Duch. ‘Benihoppe’) Spinach(Spinacia oleracea L. ‘Hydroseven’)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Yei
ld (
g /
pla
nt)
aa
b
PLCLNL0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Yie
ld (
g /
pla
nt)
PLCLNL
b
aa
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0 0.01 0.1 0.4 1 10 100
A /
PP
FD
(m
ol
mo
l-1)
Pulse cycle (ms)
b
a a a a a a
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0 0.01 0.1 0.4 1 10 100
A /
PP
FD
(m
ol
mol-1
)
Pulse cycle (ms)
d
a a a a bc
Excessively low solar radiation during cold season
Depression in photosynthesis and crop growth
Decline in crop production
Energy-saving system for supplemental lighting
Pulsed LED irradiation promote light use efficiencies
Pulsed LED irradiation promote the crop growth and yield at the same level of continuous LED irradiation
There is a possibility that pulsed LED irradiation can supplement a required light efficiently for crop growth and electricity consumption
・Energy use efficiencies
No significant difference between PL and CL
Yield was increased
Pulsed LED irradiation can be expected to promote the crop growth and yield at the same level of continuous LED irradiation
Time (s)0
Cur
rent
Turning on
Turning off
Turning on
Turning off
Light use efficiency Light use efficiency
Light use efficiency in PL was about 1.2 times as large as that in CL
Yield
Results & Discussion Results & Discussion
Yield
* Kyushu University **Postdoctoral Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, QST Takasaki Advanced Radiation Research Institute, National Institutes, *** NARO Kyushu Okinawa Agricultural Research Center, **** Kankyou Photonics Co., Ltd.
KYUSHU UNIVERSITY
Turning on and off at a high rate
De-exciting steps of P680 and P700 effect of pulsed LED irradiation
Pulsed LED irradiation can be expected to promote the crop growth and yield efficiently under energy saving
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
LA
(m
2 /
pla
nt)
PLCLNL
a
a
b b
a
b
Dec.
Feb.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Pla
nt
Hei
ght
(mm
)
c
a
b
PLCLNL
aa
bb
cc
11/21
12/1
12/12
(PL: duty ratio was 50%, CL: duty ratio was 100%)
Reduction of photosynthetic rate in PL was only 20%
Spinach PL was 2 times as large as CL
Yield was increased
No significant difference between PL and CL
Pulsed LED irradiation can be expected to promote the crop growth and yield at the same level of continuous LED irradiation
・Summary
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
PLCLNL
aa
b
LA
(cm
2 /
pla
nt)
Duty ratio; 50% Blinking time; 0.1 ms PPFD; solar radiation + 100 μmol m-2 s-1
Duty ratio; 100% Blinking time; 0 ms PPFD; solar radiation + 140 μmol m-2 s-1
No LED (NL)
Treatments
LED unit : (KP-E2-RBB, Kankyou Photonics Co., Ltd.)
No LED unit was applied
Duty ratio; 50% Blinking time; 0.1 ms PPFD; solar radiation + 70 μmol m-2 s-1
Duty ratio; 100% Blinking time; 0 ms PPFD; solar radiation + 200 μmol m-2 s-1
Treatments
No LED unit was applied
No LED (NL)
CL PL
Duty ratio 50%
Strawberry
Spinach
LA was increased No difference in Dec (before
supplemental lighting)
PPFD in PL was 1/2 compared with in CL
Light use efficiency in PL was about 1.4 times as large as that in CL
(PL: duty ratio was 50%, CL: duty ratio was 100%)
Reduction of photosynthetic rate in PL (0.01-1ms) was only 10%
CL PL
Duty ratio 50%
Plant Height No difference Effect of
Far-red light ?
Term Term
Nov.21,2017 -Dec.12,2017
Dec. 2016 - Feb. 2017
PL was increased at same level of CL in Feb (after supplemental lighting)
To make dark period during these steps…
Strawberry PL was 3 times as large as CL
During these steps, light energy is not required
P700+
P680+
Ph
oto
syst
em II
P680+
2H20 4H++O
Higher
Lower En
erg
y o
f e
lect
ron
4 Photons
Cytochrome complex
4 Photons Ph
oto
syst
em I
4e-
P700+
P680+
P700+
2NADP+
+2H+
Pulsed LED irradiation promote energy use efficiencies
Leaf area(LA) and Plant Height LA
Not included in supplemental light
exci
te ex
cite
de-excite
de-excite
P
PF
D
(μmol
m-2
s-1
)
600
400
200
0
P
PF
D
(μmol
m-2
s-1
)
300
200
100
0
E
ner
gy
use
eff
icie
nci
es
(g
kW
h-1
)
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0