a-f g rading m odel presented: january 5, 2012 what we know…

17
A-F GRADING MODEL Presented: January 5, 2012 What we know…

Upload: sabina-dennis

Post on 18-Jan-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

3

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A-F G RADING M ODEL Presented: January 5, 2012 What we know…

A-F GRADING MODEL

Presented:January 5, 2012

What we know…

Page 2: A-F G RADING M ODEL Presented: January 5, 2012 What we know…

2

REMEMBER: Schools are held accountable every day

using a lot of different tools. There is something to be learned from every

accountability system. This is only one tool of many and we will

continue to ask questions and evaluate this system so we better understand what it means and how it can improve academic achievement.

However, we never make all our decisions based on one indicator, and will continue to evaluate the entire school on a regular basis just like we always have.

There are some things we know and some things we do not. Here’s what we know:

Page 3: A-F G RADING M ODEL Presented: January 5, 2012 What we know…

3

Page 4: A-F G RADING M ODEL Presented: January 5, 2012 What we know…

4

Page 5: A-F G RADING M ODEL Presented: January 5, 2012 What we know…

5

CURRENT STANDING – STATUS % PROFICIENT (25 POINTS)

Two components: Status % proficient 25 points % proficient using VAM 15 points

Status % proficient % of students proficient reading x 12.5 + % of

students proficient math x 12.5 = total out of 25

Page 6: A-F G RADING M ODEL Presented: January 5, 2012 What we know…

6

% PROFICIENT USING VAM (15 POINTS) % proficient using VAM

This is calculated similar to how RDA calculates your statistical peers for AYP This means your school is compared to other schools

that are like it in the state Gender, Race/Ethnicity, FRP, SPED, ELL, FAY Considering these characteristics, PED predicts

how well your school and schools similar to you should perform

If you meet or exceed the predicted target, you receive a higher percentile ranking…

Page 7: A-F G RADING M ODEL Presented: January 5, 2012 What we know…

7

% PROFICIENT USING VAM (15 POINTS)

School A and School B are similar schoolsPrediction = 75% proficient in Reading, 75% proficient in Math

School A School B65% in Reading 85% in Reading65% in Math 85% in Math*perform below prediction *perform above prediction

School A School B(30th percentile in rank) (70th percentile in rank)Reading points x .30 + Reading points x .70 +Math points x. .30 = total Math points x .70 = total

**Reading points = 7.5 **Math points = 7.5All schools in the state

Page 8: A-F G RADING M ODEL Presented: January 5, 2012 What we know…

8

WHY IS IT FAIR TO COMPARE ME TO THE REST OF THE STATE?

The target for your school is based on your school’s characteristics

All schools that are similar in demographics get the same targets Therefore, PED can rank all the schools in the

state on the same scale You then get ranked on how well you met

your target

Page 9: A-F G RADING M ODEL Presented: January 5, 2012 What we know…

9

SCHOOL GROWTH (10 POINTS)

Again, this uses a VAM so it compares you to other schools that are similar to your school

PED predicts how much your school should improve year over year

If your school met or exceeded that prediction, you receive a higher percentile ranking

Page 10: A-F G RADING M ODEL Presented: January 5, 2012 What we know…

10

SCHOOL GROWTHSchool A and School B are similar schools

Prediction = growth should be 2% points every year for the last 3 years

School A School B2009 = 75% R, 75% M 2009 = 75% R, 75% M2010 = 76% R, 76% M 2010 = 78% R, 78% M2011 = 76% R, 76% M 2010 = 81% R, 81% M*perform below prediction *perform above prediction

School A School B(30th percentile in rank) (70th percentile in rank)Reading points x .30 + Reading points x .70 +Math points x. .30 = total Math points x .70 = total

**Reading points = 5 **Math points = 5

All schools in the state

Page 11: A-F G RADING M ODEL Presented: January 5, 2012 What we know…

11

GROWTH OF HIGHEST PERFORMING STUDENTS (20 POINTS)

Highest 75% of students at your school Again, this uses a VAM so it compares one student to a

similar student in the state PED predicts how well these students should perform and

grow every year over the last 3 years That prediction is 0 because the average across the state would

be that you learned one year of knowledge in one year, no more, no less

If the score is positive, the students met or exceeded that prediction and you receive more points

If the score is negative, the students did not meet the prediction and the fewer points you receive

Page 12: A-F G RADING M ODEL Presented: January 5, 2012 What we know…

12

GROWTH OF LOWEST PERFORMING STUDENTS (20 POINTS)

Lowest 25% of students at your school Again, this uses a VAM so it compares one student to a similar student in

the state Important: These students carry more weight than your highest 75%

100 students at a school – High 75 students = 20 points Low 25 students = 20 points (*the individual student in the lowest 25 has a bigger impact

in your grade than the higher 75) PED predicts how well these students should perform and grow every

year over the last 3 years That prediction is 0 because the average across the state would be that you

learned one year of knowledge in one year, no more, no less The more students that met or exceeded that prediction, you receive a

higher percentile ranking The further the student group is from zero, the less points you receive

Page 13: A-F G RADING M ODEL Presented: January 5, 2012 What we know…

13

OTHER ACADEMIC INDICATORS (10 POINTS) Attendance based on unexcused absences

= 5 points Opportunity to Learn Survey = 5 points

Survey is not available in this grade, so all 10 points is derived from attendance

PED sets a 95% attendance target for all schools in the state

(Your school attendance rate / .95) x 10 = total

If your school exceeds 95% attendance, you will receive more than 10 points

Page 14: A-F G RADING M ODEL Presented: January 5, 2012 What we know…

14

BONUS POINTS (+5 POINTS) Not awarded Available in 2012

Page 15: A-F G RADING M ODEL Presented: January 5, 2012 What we know…

15

GRADUATION RATE (9 POINTS)

PED sets target of 95% for 4 year cohort (four-year cohort graduation rate / .95) x 8 =

total PED sets target of 95% for 5 & 6 year cohort

(five-year & six-year cohort graduation rate / .95) x 4 = total

Page 16: A-F G RADING M ODEL Presented: January 5, 2012 What we know…

16

GRADUATION GROWTH (5 POINTS) Again, this uses a VAM so it compares one

school to a similar school in the state based on demographics

PED predicts what your school’s graduation rate growth should be from year to year

This calculation is done exactly the same as school growth was done

Page 17: A-F G RADING M ODEL Presented: January 5, 2012 What we know…

17

CAREER AND COLLEGE READINESS (15 POINTS)

Participation (5 points) (number of students who participate in any one

of the qualified classes or activities / number of eligible students) x points available = total points

Success (10 points) (number of students who participated and who

met the benchmark / number of total students who participated) x points available = total points