a e j m c morality m i m e ( tamborini)
Upload: west-virginia-university-department-of-communication-studies
Post on 22-Dec-2014
1.144 views
DESCRIPTION
Abstract: Based on Haidt’s (2001) theory that moral judgment is shaped by the salience of moral intuitions, Tamborini’s (2010) model describes reciprocal processes in which a) the salience of moral intuitions shapes evaluations of media content and exposure, and b) exposure patterns promote production of content adhering to and reinforcing these moral intuitions.TRANSCRIPT
Model of Intuitive Morality and Exemplars
MIME
Ron TamboriniMichigan State University
Past Research Media & Morality
How are media and morality related? Research is limited by conceptions of morality
Most studies use a rationalist perspective Underplays intuition and emotion Entertainment theory highlights these The MIME was a response to this
MIME’s theoretical foundation
MIME is a reciprocal model of influence Multi-stage model: short & long-term influence Short-term based on two theories:
• Exemplification Theory − Media display powerful & frequent moral
exemplars− Moral exemplars effect salience of different
moral values• Moral Foundations Theory (MFT)
− Identifies content relevant to moral judgments, and mechanisms that shape moral judgments
MIME’s theoretical foundation
Exemplification theory (Zillmann, 2002) Two things increase media’s effect on
judgment• Recent &frequent use of specific moral exemplars• Concrete and highly emotional exemplars
− iconic images are particularly powerful− influence increases with time
MIME’s theoretical foundation
Moral foundations theory (Haidt 2001) Instinct tells us right and wrong Dual-process logic (Intuitive &Rational systems)
• Intuitive is a fast gut response (default mode)• Rational is deliberation when things are complex
Five instincts (domains) govern moral judgment• Care/Harm• Fairness• Ingroup loyalty• Authority• Purity
Figure 1: A model of intuitive morality and exemplars (MIME). aAffirming media content is defined as content designed with the intention that it will be perceived by target audience members as adhering to their overall moral domain system, either through automatic appraisal or controlled reappraisal. bDomain salience and exemplar salience only lead to controlled reappraisal when domains are in conflict with each other or when exemplars are difficult to categorize as fitting within a specific domain. cBoth automatic appraisal and controlled reappraisal produce positively valued responses when an individual perceives that content adheres to their overall moral domain system .
Note: This model is taken from: Tamborini, R. (in press). Model of Intuitive Morality and Exemplars. In R. Tamborini (Ed), Media and the Moral Mind. London, UK: Routledge.
Automatic Appraisal c
• Attention to salient domain/exemplar content
• Evaluation (like/hate) based on dominantly salient content
Controlled Reappraisalc
• Rational response (like/hate) based on accept/reject need to violate one domain in order to conform to another
Selective Exposure
to liked content
Production of content affirming salient domains
and domain exemplars
a
Cultural Environment • domain reinforcing • domain exemplars • domain relevant
Exposure to media content affirming salient domainsand domain exemplars a • entertainment, news, etc.
ExemplarSalience b
Domain Salience b
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 4
Stage 5
Stage 6
Stage 3
Model of Intuitive Morality and Exemplars (MIME)
MIME Research
Examples of research on the MIME Repeated exposure’s impact on domain salience Impact of domain salience on
• Approval of character behavior • Enjoyment of narrative outcomes
Automatic versus rational processing Domain impact on selective game play style Patterns in the production of domain adhering
content for media produced for different cultures
Media and the Moral Mind
Thank You
Thank you for listening!
Also thanks to…Allison Eden, Matt Grizzard, Robert Lewis,
Sujay Prabhu, Nick Bowman, & Rene Weber