a comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... the nps institutional archive theses and...

163
Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of traverses Aumchantr, Saman Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/19196

Upload: lydang

Post on 25-Mar-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive

Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection

1984

A comparison of methods of least squares

adjustment of traverses

Aumchantr, Saman

Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School

http://hdl.handle.net/10945/19196

Page 2: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment
Page 3: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

KNOX LIBRARY

*3f

Page 4: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment
Page 5: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment
Page 6: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL

Monterey, California

T SISA Comparison of Methods

of

Least Squares Adjustment of Traverses

by

Saman Aumchantr

December 1984

Thesis Advisor: Rolland L. Hardy

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited

T221697

Page 7: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment
Page 8: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (Whan Data Entered)

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE READ INSTRUCTIONSBEFORE COMPLETING FORM

I. REPORT NUM9ER 2. GOVT ACCESSION NO. I 3- RECIPIENT'S CATALOG MUMBER

4. TITLE (and Subtitle)

A Comparison of Methods of Least Squares

Adjustment of Traverses

S. TYPE OF REPORT 4 PERIOD COVEREDMaster's ThesisDecember 1984

S. PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBER

7. AUTHORfs;

Saman Aumchantr

8. CONTRACT OH GRANT NUMBERS;

9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND AOORESS

Naval Postgraduate School

Monterey, California 93943

10. PROGRAM ELEMENT, PROJECT, TASKAREA 4 WORK UNIT NUMBERS

-iII. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS

Naval Postgraduate School

Monterey, California 93943

12. REPORT DATE

December 198413. NUMBER O F P AGES

151I*. MONITORING AGENCY NAME 4 ADDRESS^// dtllarent trom Controlling Ottlca) IS. SECURITY CLASS, (ol thla report)

UNCLASSIFIED

15«. DECLASSIFICATION DOWNGRADINGSCHEDULE

16. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (ol thla Report)

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited

17. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (ol the abatract entered In Block 20, II dltlerent from Report)

18. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

19. KEY WORDS (Continue on reverse aide If neceaaary and Identity by block number)

Adjustment, Approximate Method, Comparison, Condition Equation Method,

Least Squares Method, Traverse, UTM grid coordinates.

20. ABSTRACT (Continue on reverse aide If neceae-ary and Identity by block number)

Traverse is a method of surveyinq in which a sequence of lenqths and

directions of lines between points on the Earth are measured and used in

determining positions of the points. This method is one of several used to

find the accurate geodetic positions which various agencies use. Traversingis a convenient, rapid method for establishina horizontal control.

The theoretical background is provided here to explain the method of

traverse station position computations and adjustments in the Universal

DO | JAN 73 1473 EDITION OF I NOV 65 IS OSSOLETF.

S N 0102- LF- 01 4- 6601 1SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Data Entered)

Page 9: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE r~h«n D«<« EntmtmO)

Block 20 (continued)

Transverse Mercator grid coordinates. Closed traverse station positionswere computed and adjusted using the Approximate Method and by the LeastSquares Method. The adjusted coordinates of both methods were transformedfrom the Universal Transverse Mercator grid coordinates to geoqraphiccoordinates and compared with the coordinates which were adjusted by the U.S.National Ocean Service.

S N 0102- LF- 014- 660!

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE(T*?i«n DmIm Enltrad)

Page 10: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited

A Comparison of Methodsof

Least Squares Adjustment of Traverses

by

Saman AumchantrLieutenant, Royal Thai Navy

B.S., Royal Thai Naval Academy, 1976

Submitted in partial fulfillment of therequirements for the degree of

MASTER OF SCIENCE IN HYDROGRAPHIC SCIENCES

from the

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOLDecember 1984

Page 11: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

4 9C2

£ ' I OUDLEY KNOX LIBRARY

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL

MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA 93943

ABSTRACT

Traverse is a method of surveying in which a sequence of

lengths and directions of lines tetween points on the Earth

are measured and used in determining positions of the

points. This method is one of several used to find the

accurate geodetic positions which various agencies use.

Traversing is a convenient, rapid method for establishing

horizontal control.

The theoretical background is provided here to explain

the method of traverse station position computations and

adjustments in the Universal Transverse Kercator grid coor-

dinates. Closed traverse station positions were computed

and adjusted using the Approximate Method and by the Least

Squares Method. The adjusted coordinates of both methods

were transformed from the dniversai Transverse Mercator grid

coordinates to geographic coordinates and compared with the

coordinates which were adjusted by the U.S. National Ocean

Service.

Page 12: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

DUDLEY KNOX LIBRARYNAVAL F03T IOOLMONTEREY, C."

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION 10

II. TRAVERSE . . . 12

A. GENERAL 12

B. ANGLE AND DIRECTION MEASUREMENT 13

C. DISTANCE MEASUREMENTS 15

D. ACCURACY 16

E. DATA ACQUISITION 16

III. TRAVERSE COMPUTATIONS AND ADJUSTMENTS 2 1

A. INITIAL TRAVERSE COMPUTATIONS 21

5. COMPUTATION OF DISCREPANCIES 23

C. ADJUSTMENT OF A TRAVERSE BY AN APPROXIMATE

METHOD 2 6

D. ADJUSTMENT OF A TRAVERSE BY LEAST SQUARES

METHODS 28

1. The Principle of Least Squares 28

2. Least Squares Adjustment of Indirect

Observations 31

3. Least Squares Adjustment by the

Condition Equation Method 47

IV. DISCUSSIONS AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS 59

V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION 66

A. CONCLUSIONS 66

B. RECOMMENDATION : . . 67

APPENDIX A: PROGRAM 1 63

APPENDIX E: PROGRAM 2 89

Page 13: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

APPENDIX C: PROGRAM 3 121

LIST OF REFERENCES 1U3

BIBLIOGRAPHY 149

INITIAL DISTRIBUTION LIST 150

Page 14: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

LIST OF TABLES

II.

III.

IV.

V.

VI.

VII.

VIII

IX.

X.

XI. •

XII.

Classification, Standards of Accuracy, and

General Specifications for Horizontal Control ... 17

Coordinates of Known Stations and Azimuths .... 19

Grid Distances and Standard Deviations 20

The Observed Angles and Standard Deviations .... 20

Data for Iritial Traverse Computations 23

The Azimuth Calculation 24

Initial Traverse Computations 25

Initial Traverse Computations (Approximate

Method with Adjusted Azimuth) 27

Adjusted Coordinates (Approximate Method) 29

The Comparisons Between the Computer Storage

Area and CPU Time of Programs 1 , 2, and 3 60

Geographic Coordinates 64

The Comparisons Between the Standard Deviations

of Least Squares 65

Page 15: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

LIST OF FIGQRES

2. 1 Closed Traverse 12

2.2 Closed-loop Traverse 13

2.3 Horizontal Angle 15

3. 1 A Closed Traverse 22

Page 16: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I express sincere gratitude to my Thesis Advisor, Dr.

Rolland L. Hardy, and Second Reader, Cdr. Glen R. Schaefer,

foe their suggestions and assistance. Finally, I thank Ms.

Tamara M. Hayling, Lt. Nicholas E. Pengini, and Messrs.

Mark I. Faye, Peter J. Rakowsky, and James R. Sherry who

made this thesis possible.

Page 17: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

I. INTRODUCTION

Hydrographic surveying includes many branches of science

for the purpose of the production of nautical charts

specially designed for use by the mariner. The determina-

tion of position in hydrographic surveying is as important

as the measurement of depth. Before determining an accurate

hydrographic position, accurate geodetic positions 1 for

shore control must be established. There are many methods

available to establish geodetic control in the survey area.

These methods are:

1. Triangulation

2. Trilateration

3. Traverse

4. Intersection

5. Resection

The process of making a proper nautical chart consists,

first of all, in setting up a framework of marks on the

ground. Before 1950 the main framework, of a geodetic survey

almost always consisted of triangulation, which was replaced

by traverse if the topography made triangulation impracti-

cable. During the last decade, the introduction of elec-

tronic distance measuring (EDM) equipment has made both

trilateration and traverse economical, and an acceptable

substitute for triangulation. In fact, it appears probable

that these new methods will replace triangulation as the

main framework for new geodetic surveys [Ref. 1], It is

evident that triangulation and traverse are the main methods

used for establishing control. There seems to be no

X A position of a point on the surface of the Earthexpressed in terms of geodetic latitude, geodetic longitude-ana geodetic height. A geodetic position implies an adoptedgeodetic datum.

10

Page 18: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

agreement among the various agencies as to which of these

two methods is mostly used. The U.S. National Ocean Service

(NOS) does the majority of its horizontal control surveys

for hydrography with traverse (about 90^) [Eef. 2]. The

main factor for the selection of one or the other method

depends on the geographical configuration of the survey

project area and the availability of good EDM equipment

.

Traversing is a convenient, rapid method for establishing

horizontal control. It is particularly useful in densely

built areas, when the coastline tends to be even, along a

railroad track, and in heavily forested areas where lengths

of sight are short so that neither triangula tion nor

trilateration is suitable.

The objectives of this thesis are to show methods of

traverse station position computation and a comparison of

methods of least squares adjustment. Closed traverse

station positions were computed and adjusted using the

Approximate Method and by the Least Squares ilethod in the

Universal Transverse Hercator (UTM) grid coordinates. The

computer programs were written to calculate the adjusted

traverse station positions. Test data included those data

obtained during the Geodetic Survey Field Experience course

at the Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) in October 1933.

The results of comparative computations are shown to

more significant figures, in this thesis, than are normally

considered desirable in production work. The same observed

data are used with each of three computational methods. It

is important to recognize that what is being compared is not

observational precision but computational precision. Hence,

it is considered necessary for a rigorous comparison of

computational precision, including round off error, to show

results to several more decimal places than is justifiable

based on observational precision alone.

1 1

Page 19: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

II. TRAVERSE

A. GENERAL

Traverse is a method of surveying in which a series of

straight lines connect successive established points along

the route of a survey. An angular measurement is taken

using a theodolite at each point where the traverse changes

direction. Distances along the line between successive

traverse points are determined by EDrf equipment. The points

defining the ends of the traverse lines are called turning

points, traverse points, or traverse stations. Each

straight section of a traverse is called a leg or a traverse

line.

A closed traverse originates at a point of known posi-

tion and is closed or. another point of known horizontal

position. Traverse I-1-2-3-F originates at point I with a

backsight along line IA of known azimuth and closes on point

F, with a foresight along line FB also of known azimuth

(Figure 2. 1) . This type of traverse is preferable to all

Figure 2. 1 Closed Traverse.

12

Page 20: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

others since computational checks are possible which allow

detection of systematic errors 2 in both distance and

direction.

A closed-loop (closed polygon) traverse is a special

case of a closed traverse in which the originating and

terminating points are the same point with a known hori-

zontal position. Traverse I-1-2-3-4-I, originates and

terminates on point I (Figure 2.2). This type of traverse

permits an internal check on the angles, but there is no

check on the linear measurements. Therefore, there is a

possibility that an error proportional to distance may occur

and not be detected.

Figure 2.2 Closed-loop Traverse.

B. ANGLE AND DIRECTION MEASUREMENT

Angles and directions may be defined by means of bear-

ings, azimuths, deflection angles, angles to the right, or

interior angles. These quantities are said to be observed

2 Systematic errors may be caused by faulty instrumentsor factors such as temperature or humility changes whichaffect the performance of measuring instruments.

13

Page 21: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

when obtained directly in the field and calculated when

obtained indirectly by computation.

A theodolite is an instrument designed to observe hori-

zontal directions and measure vertical angles. It consists

of a telescope mounted to rotate vertically on a horizontal

axis supported by a pair of vertical standards attached to a

revolvable circular plate containing a graduated circle for

observing horizontal directions. another graduated arc is

attached to one standard so that vertical angles can be

measured

.

Repeating and direction theodolites have features that

are common to both types of instruments. Repeating theodol-

ites are read directly to 20" or 01' and by estimation to

one-tenth the corresponding direct reading. Direction theo-

dolites are usually read directly to 01" and can be esti-

mated to tenths of seconds [Ref. 3, p. 215]. In general,

direction theodolites are more precise than are repeating

theodolites.

The direction theodolite observes directions only and

angles are computed by subtracting one direction from

another. Assume that the horizontal angle AI3 (Figure 2.3)

is to be measured with a direction theodolite. The theo-

dolite is set over point I, leveled and centered, and a

sight is taken on point A. The horizontal cirzle is then

viewed through the optical- vie wing system and the circle

reading is observed and recorded. Assume the reading is

450 02' 40". The telescope is then sighted on point B. The

horizontal circle is then viewed through the op tical- viewing

system and the circle reading is observed and recorded.

Assume the reading is 124° 11' 59". Ihese two observations

constitute directions which have a common reference direc-

tion that is completely arbitrary. The clockwise horizontal

angle is

i = (124° m 59") - (450 02' 40") = 79° 09' 19"

14

Page 22: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

Figure 2-3 Horizontal Angle.

C. DISTANCE MEASUREMENTS

There are several methods of determining distance, the

choice of which depends on the accuracy required and the

cost. For example, tacheometry, taping, and ED.1 equipment

can be used. The general availability of EDM equipment has

practically eliminated the use of taping for the measurement

of traverse lengths. Accuracies are comparable, or

superior, to those obtained with invar tapes.

Distances measured using EDM equipment are subject to

errors arising from the instrumental components, calibration

of the equipment, inaccuracies in the meteorological data,

elevation discrepancies, and centering of the instruments or

reflectors. The reduction of measured distances involves

converting the slope distance to a horizontal distance,

converting the chord distance to an equivalent arc distance,

and reducing the arc distance to the ellipsoid. The reduc-

tion of slope distance to horizontal distance is necessary

to compensate for the difference in elevation of the end

points of the measured line. The horizontal distance is

15

Page 23: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

reduced to tha geodetic distance ty applying a sea level

corrector and a chord-arc corrector to the horizontal

distance [Ref. 4, pp. 124-125].

D. ACCURACY

In general, the accuracy of a traverse is judged on the

basis of the resultant error of closure of the traverse.

This resultant closing error is a function of the accuracies

in the measurement of directions and distances. The classi-

fication, standards of accuracy, and general specifications

foe horizontal control have been prepared by the Federal

Geodetic Control Committee (FGCC) [ Ref . 5] and have been

reviewed by the American Society of Civil Engineers, The

American Congress on Surveying and Mapping, and the American

Geophysical Onion (Table I) . The third-order traverse class

I and class II are of particular interest because these are

the orders of accuracy the hydrographer is usually required

to accomplish.

E. DATA ACQUISITION

The data for this thesis were acquire! at Moss Landing,

California, by NPS Hydrographic students during the Geodetic

Survey Field Experience course in October 1983. All of the

known station positions and azimuths (Table II) were

adjusted by the Coast and Geodetic Survey by third-order

methods [Ref. 6 ].

The distances were observed by using a Kern DM102 and a

Tellurometer HRA5. The Kern DM102 is an electro-optical

distance meter. The measuring accuracy was ±(5 mm + 5 ppm) .

The Tellurometer MRA5 is a microwave instrument. Precision

in terms of probable error, in the temperature range of

-32°C to +U40C, is ± (5 cm + 100 ppm) for a single

16

Page 24: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

to

aa•H4J(0

U

= £•

:s

s !2

U_l

CQ

en

M

a(3)

O«0 UC4Jid co

•u

u^(ti (ti

3 du oU N«:-h•u

<4-i oOKto Ul

nd OU*Hid

G(tJ

+J

en

co

- >. 5-

,1 sI I* i

= = = o. > J —« ; = § o « o

G

2 c

||"3

J!a ^

I

C

— 30 ^ .Soo~ a

!§"

e

T

a r* r*

u = -Z o 3 -O -*f

ft. "3 U - * c

* .5

— r< m

a. = a.

= E

UsZ O £

Siz

= 2 8 ° «

3 5- = ="i Z 3 £ T

"iu^-3

" .r o u

^ £ O

3 a.

O oLs 8

4->

<d

U•H4-1

•HWW(0

r-l

u

36 ,> 2 -

s - I :

£ 5 = S =

±3 S u -e c2 => o 3, "- Z oS = Cn

" - j,3 a '= cc ; 2 o

"3.oS=5 u 55? ? e 5: ^ i

C i Z j za! o

5 Z*r: 3Js Z Z c/5 <

1 7

Page 25: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

a s a

1 1

1

§ s.3 S

J5 =

3 -siIS B.

-, ? •-> >•

^ s ° • = sSo 2 3 J= J

2- i = e= o -5 = 3 "=

g JS £ ^ °"

III Eo s 75 a 2 a

3 —- C= 3

o i* 3_ .O

u -U u3 ua J*» uJ .O

C uu ^J >.— -s

.3 C

^ 3o = „

3 J

£-1

3 S

* 2

2 S

s. ^

C J — .-

w

EH

T3 I

<y i

a i

•H I

-P I

C I

O I

U I

U 5 i o

u 3 -3 u

3 1 3 3

* (- 3 ~ _ c .2

_ 3 =o „ 3

a - s 3.

z = BJ

= 5. 5 2 =

- Z *

" "2 - ^^y^S::"^^— 3 C> 5

g" g,3

y ^ ji

3 t =n "3 fl

1 „ 32 £ e

3.-S 2 ? 35 « S 2 _

3 ^- 2

*-i

o

3"o

a.

aB

a

-3

B =w 5 -3

fl

£ N «—

""a O c

f^t e c

-

a

jj

b =a -3

.-a >s .^

U —— „ a a. 3S*

g a <q—

<J\

a

Q.a

•3

a. Co

= 1^II

Z 3 X 3 i

O c 31- *-• -* .-3 90i2c3-5

rc l. 3 c ^ -

1- w 2 5

•a ^ —

53 '- r- 3

S. „

I 2 P

I

3 3 (j =

— 3

C -3*

- 3 ^ 3

— ., 3 O

i3 JD—

- a

T z -

i

jz w

c -

a .-3

&3

a n e

O

^ s. z.

3

a rz

Oj:

B i n-3C3

« r 2 y<sa

Jt ,

3

c •-a _

- -3,-5 S.

* » "

- 3 •» =

18

Page 26: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

TABLE II

Coordinates of Known Stations and Azimuths

Station

Moss 2

HoIe

UTM grid coordinatesGrid Northing Gri.3 Easting

( m. ) ( m. )

4,072,555.35206

4,079,258.31754

Grid azimuth clockwisefrom North

From Moss 2 to Pipher stations

From Holm to Moran stations

608, 279.04404

612, 238.85256

Azimuth

o » ii

100 16 23.778

136 33 26.334

determination. The distances were observed in the field,

corrected by temperature and pressure for propagation error.

Unfortunately, meteorological data are generail/ accuired

only at the end points of a measured line. Using the mean

of these meteorological values only approximates the actual

conditions of the entire measured line and does not

completely correct for errors in the propagation velocit7 of

electromagnetic radiation. By applying the elevation, sea

level, and scale factor corrections they were reduced to UTM

grid distances [Ref. 4, pp. 124-125]. The UTM grid

distances and standard deviations of the distances were

determined in meters (Table III) .

The angles were observed by using a Wild T-2 theodolite.

To ensure the correctness of the beginning and ending

azimuths, a check azimuth to a second station of known posi-

tion was observed. The angles were observed at stations

Moss 2, Mossback, Dune Temp, and Holm (Table 17). All

observations were made by NPS students and conform to

specification for a third-order class I traverse.

19

Page 27: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

TABLE III

Grid Distances and Standard Deviations

StandardGrid distances between Distances deviation

stations ( m.) ( m. )

Moss 2 and Mossback 1,424.004 0.001

Mossback and Dune Temp 365.744 0.001

Dune Temp and Holm 6,476.271 0.003

TABLE 17

The Observed Angles and Standard Deviations

Eacksight Center Foresight Observed Standard|

station station station angles deviationlI II it

Pipher Moss 2 Mossback 246 05 43.200 01.984

Moss 2 Mossback Duns Temp 222 51 08.600 01.405

Mossback Dune Temp Holm 190 15 02.600 01.203

Dune Temp Holm Moran 277 05 17.000 01.614

20

Page 28: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

III. TRAVERSE COMPUTATIONS AND ADJUSTMENTS

A. INITIAL TRAVERSE COMPUTATIONS

A traverss (Figure 3.1) originates at station 1 (known

position) and terminates at station 4 (also known position)

(Table V). To compute the forward azimuth (Table VI) of an

unknown leg, the angle is added to the back azimuth of the

previous leg (Equation 3. 1) .

AZj = Az

Where

y dj - (i-1) 180'

j =1

the number of legs,

(3.1)

AZj = the forward azimuth of an unknown leg, and

Az = the fixed initial azimuth.

For the computation of UTM grid coordinates, let AEj

and ^N- be designated as the departure and latitude for leg

i (Figure 3.1) so that the general formulas to compute the

departure and latitude are

A E . = dj

s in A zj

AN. = d. cos Az.i i i

(3.2)

(3.3)

where i=1,2,3,...n,n = the number of the observed angles.

The algebraic signs of the departure and latitude for a

traverse leg depend on the signs of the sine and cosine of

the azimuth of that leg. The algebraic sign of the depar-

ture and latitude is determined by the following rules:

1. UTM grid azimuths are refered to grid north.

2. For azimuths between 0° and 180°, the departure is

plus; for all other azimuths, the departure is minus.

3. For azimuths between 90° and 270°, the latitude is

minus; for all other azimuths, the latitude is plus.

21

Page 29: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

Figure 3. 1 A Closed Traverse.

The calculators and computers with internal routines for

trigonometric functions yield the proper sign automatically

given the azimuth. The major portion of traverse computa-

tions consists of calculating departures and latitudes for

successive legs and cumulating the values to determine the

coordinates for consecutive traverse stations.

22

Page 30: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

Leg

1 - 2

2-33-4

TABLE V

Data for Initial Traverse Computations

Distance( m. )

= 1,424.004

365.744

= 6,476.271

Station 1

DTM grid Easting

<*1

ex

The initial UTM grid azimuth kzf

UTM grid Northing M1

Angle

246 05 43. 200

222 51 08.600

190 15 02. 600

= 100 16 23.778

= 4,072,555.85206 m

.

608,279.04404 m.

The coordinates of station j (j = i + 1) are E;

and

N. , the coordinates of station j are

E, = E

= H-

AE(

An.

(3.4)

(3.5)

where i = 1 , 2 ,3 ,

The values of departures, latitudes, and coordinates are

shown in Table VII and were computed from the data in Tables

V and VI by application of Equations (3.2) through (3.5).

B. COMPUTATION OF DISCREP& NCIES

A closed traverse at iloss Landing (Figure 3.1) origi-

nated at station 1 (Moss 2) and closed at station 4 (Holm).

The closing errors' for a traverse are caused by observation

errors in the observed angles and the measured distances.

The closing errors may be computed by applying Equations

(3. 1) through (3.6) .

23

Page 31: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

TABLE VI

The Azimuth Calculation

1

ForwardAzimuth

BackAzimuth

ObservedAngle

i

i

ii

AzF

100 16 23.778

«i 246 05 43.200

Az1

346 22 06. 978

- 180 00 00.000

A22-1

166 22 06. 978

°2 222 51 08.600

Az2

389 13 15.578

- 130 00 00.000

AZ 3-2 209 13 15. 578

<*3 190 15 02.600

Az3

399 28 18. 178

- 180 00 00.000

AZ4-3

219 28 18. 178

i

The angular error of closure may be compute! by applying

Equation (3.1) becomes

Az r + 2oL- (n-1) 180° - Az, = H

I =1

(3.6)

where Az. is the fixed closing azimuth and ff-, is the

angular error of closure. Az is the grid azimuth from

stations Holm to Moran (AzL

= 136° 33' 26.334") (Table II).

The computed closing azimuth is equal to Az plus the

observed angle at station Holm = (219° 28' 18.178") +

(2770 05' 17") = 4960 33' 35.178" = 136° 33 f 35.178". From

Equation (3.6) , the angular error of closure is

(1360 33' 35.178") - (1360 33' 26.334") = + 08.844".

24

Page 32: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

TABLE VII

Initial Traverse Computations

Aw.

An,

An.

Values in meters

4,072,555.85206

1,383.89267 A E,

4,073,939.74473

319.20061 AE2

4,074, 258.94534

4,999.28234 AE3

4,079, 258.22818

Values in meters

608,279.04404

- 335. 60166

607,943.44238

178.54871

608, 12 1. 99109

4, 1 16. 94755

612,238.93864

To compute the errors in closure in position for a

closed traverse. Equations (3.2) to (3.5) are applied to

obtain:

n-1

or

i ; 1

n-1

*3 " 2^ Ni

" ( NT

- N1

)

i =1

= E,

= N.

- E

- N

Where : n = the number of observed angles,

»2 , W

3= precalculat ed discrepancies,

E1

, N1

= the fixed initial coordinates,

Ej , N = the fixed closing coordinates, and

E n , N n= the computed closing coordinates.

The result of the errors in closure in position of a

traverse is

(3.7)

(3.8)

(3.7a)

(3.8a)

25

Page 33: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

£d = ( W| + W| )W2 (3.9)

The computed closing coordinates of this traverse are

E„ = 612,238.93864 m and N. = 4,079,258.228 18 m. The fixed4 4

closing coordinates are ET

= 6 12,238.85256 m and N =

4,079,258.31754 m. The precalculated discrepancies can be

computed by using Equations (3.7a) and (3.8a). The results

are W"2

= 0.08608 m and W3

= -0.08936 m. By applying

Equation (3.9), Ad is 0.12408 m . From Table III, the total

measured distance is 8,266.019 m. The ratio of the distance

error of closure to the total distance is 0.12408/8,266.0 19

or 1 part in 66,618. The ratio is an indication of the

goodness of this traverse.

C. ADJUSTMENT OF A TRAVERSE BY AN APPROXIMATE METHOD

The angular error of closure of traverse may be distrib-

uted equally among the observed anjles. The angular error

of closure of this traverse is +8.844", which corresponds to

a correction for each angle of -2.211". The observed angles

were correctei by this value. The adjusted azimuth was then

computed. The departures, latitudes, and coordinates were

recomputed ty using the adjusted azimuth (Table VIII) . The

closure corrections in E and N coordinates are +-0. 09635 m

and -0.04326 m, respectively. The resultant closure is

0.10562 m. The ratio of the distance error of closure to

the total distance is 0.10562/8,266.0 19 or 1 pact in 78,262.

The adjustments of a closed traverse by the Approximate

Method are completed by the compass rule which proportions

the errors in E and N coordinates according to the distance

of the course [Ref. 4, p. 354]. The corrections are applied

to the departures and latitudes prior to computation of

coordinates.

26

Page 34: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

TABLE VIII

Initial Traverse Computations (Approximate Method withAdjusted Azimuth)

CL

d

Ant

An2

An,

Observed angle Correction

246° 05' 43.2" - 2.211

2220 sit 08.6 - 2. 211

OU 1900 15' 02. 6" -2.211"

CL 2770 05' 17.0" - 2.211"

dN

Values in meters

4 ,072,555.85206

1,383.88907

4 ,073, 939.741 13

319.20444

4,074, 2S8-.94557

4,999.41523

4 ,079, 258.36080

4 ,079,258.31754

0.04326

Az,

Az

Az 2-1

Az.

Az 3-2

Az.

Az4-3

AZ4-L

Ae,

Ae2

Ae,

£.2

Adjusted azimuth

o » '1

100 16 23.778

dE

246 05 40. 989

346 22 04. 767

180 00 00. 000

166 22 04. 767

222 51 06. 389

389 13 1 1. 156

180 00 00. 000

209 13 1 1. 156

190 15 00. 3 89

399 28 11. 545

180 00 00. 00

219 28 11. 545

277 05 14. 789

136 33 26. 334

Values in meters

608, 279. 04404

- 335.61649

607,943. 42755

178.54137

608, 121. 96942

4, 1 16. 78679

612,238. 75621

612,238. 85256*

r

- 0.09635

27

Page 35: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

6 E. = ( dE / D ) . d;

(3.10)

8n- =( dN / D ) . d. (3.1 1)

Where: Se. = correction to A 2 ,/

8 N. = correction to An< ,

dE = total closure correction in the S coordinate,

dN = total closure correction in the N coordinate,

and

D = total distance.

The adjusted E and N coordinates (Table IX) were

different from the fixed E and N coordinates (Table II) by

0.00001 m due to round off error. The calculations and

adjustments were illustrated in sections A, B, and C by

using the hand calculator (TI-59) and rounded off at 5

decimal places. The computer program was written to calcu-

late the adjusted traverse station positions by the

Approximate Method by using 16 decimal places (Appendix A).

Ths approximate traverse adjustment is based on an assumed

condition that the angular precision equals the precision in

linear distance.

D. ADJUSTMENT OF A TRAVERSE BY LEAST SQUARES METHODS

The method of least squares provides a rigorous

adjustment and best estimates for positions of all traverse

stations. The Least Squares Method is used to

simultaneously eliminate closing errors in azimuths and

coordinates of traverses.

1 • The Principle of Lea st S qua res

The fundamental condition of the least squares tech-

nique in surveying requires that the sum of the squares of

the residuals be minimized. A residual is defined as the

difference between the true and observed values. In making

28

Page 36: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

TABLE IX

Adjusted Coordinates (Approximate Method)

Departure Correction

AE1

-335.61649 + 0.01659

AE2

178.54137 + 0.00426

AE3

4,116. 78679 + 0.07549

Latitude Correction

AN, 1,383.88907 - 0.00745

AN2

319.20444 - 0.00191

AN 4,999.41523 - 0.03389

Grid

E1

Grid

N1

Values in meters

608,279.04404

- 335.59990

607,943. 44U14

178.54613

608, 121.99027

4, 1 16.86228

612,238. 85255

Values in meters

4,072,555.85206

1,383. 88162

4,073,939.73368

319.20253p

4,074,258.93621

4,999. 38134

4,079,258.31755

physical measurements, the true values can never be deter-

mined. The least squares principle establishes a criterion

for obtaining the best estimates of the true values.

If the best estimates of the true values are stated

by x. and observed values by x. , the residuals are expressed

as

v. = X: - X;I

I "I

The fundamental condition of least squares, for

uncorrelated observations with equal precision are expressed

as

29

Page 37: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

]> ( v. )2 = (v^ 2 (v

2 )2 (v

3 )2 + . . . . (v

n )2 = Minimum

i z 1

or in matrix form

VT V = Minimum (3.12)

In general, the observed values are of unequal

precision. The observed value of high precision has a small

variance. Conversely, a low precision of the observed value

has a large variance. Since the value of the variance goes

in opposite direction to that of the precision, the observa-

tion is assigned a value called weight corresponding to a

quality that is inversely proportional to the observation's

variance.

For uncorrelated measurements x. , x , x -, , . . .222 2x n , with variances

1, tf M <$ , . . . C , respectively, the

weights of these uncorrelated measurements are,2 2 2 2 ^2 2

P «0./5,P = ft/ <S , p = Q/ ... .

11] 22 2 33 3

n n

^ 2 2

= <J/C5 n (3.13)

where (Jo is the proportionally constant of an observation

of unit weight [ Eef - 7, p. 67]. These weights may be

collected into a corresponding diagonal P matrix, called the

weight matrix:

P =

p .c1

1

p .

2 2

p .

33

0.

.

.

• pn n

30

Page 38: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

The weight matrix consists of weighted observations

of a traverse with mixed kinds of measurements. They are

distances and angles- The variance of a measured distance

is expressed in meters and an angle in radians. For

uncorrelated observations of unequal precision, the funda-

mental condition of least squares is expressed as

I : 1

n.v.2 =p V 2 +P V 2 +P V 2 +

= Minimum

+ p v 2nn n

or in matrix form

V'PV = Minimum (3.14)

In the problems involving the adjustment of observed

values, all observed quantities are expressed by functions

of the quantities to be determined. In simple cases these

relations are linear, but when this is not the case, the

relations must" be converted into the linear form by

expanding them into Taylor's series. The terms of higher

'order are neglected, so as to obtain linear relations,

solving the resulting linear equations, then iterating until

the effect of the neglected higher order terms are

minimized.

2- Least Squares Adjust me nt of Indirect Observati ons

The observed values are related to the desired

unknown values through formulas or functions which are

called observation equations. One observation equation is

written for each measurement. To solve for the best value

of each unknown parameter, at least one redundact observa-

tion equation must be written. That is, the number observa-

tions must be greater than the number of unknowns. The

linear observation equations can be written in the general

form as follows:

31

Page 39: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

aiO+ a n X

i

+ a!2

X2 • • •

+ a im X m= G

1

+ 71

a20

+ a2i

xi

+ a22

x2

* 2mm I 2

a + a x + a «x «nO n1A

l n2 2+ a orT, x m = G„ + v nn m m n n

where n is the number of observations; m is the number of

the unknowns; a^, a 20 # • • - an Q are constants; a n , a i2'

. a are coefficients of the unknowns x. , x ,

x m ; and v , v2 , . . . v n are the residuals.

Because the observations G. (i = 1 , 2, . n) are

not free from random errors, each G- must be corrected by a

residual value, v. . let b- = G- - a. . Thus

a n x^

+ a i2 x2

+ * a lm x m " b1 = v

1

a21

X1

+ a22 X2

+ 2mm 2 2

an1

X1

+ an2 X2

+ a x - b = vn m m n n

or in the matrix form

V = AX - B (3.15)

This equation is called the observation equation or

the observation equation matrix.

For uncorrelated observations of unequal precision,

substitute the value for the V matrix from the observation

Equation (3.15) into Equation (3.14)

32

Page 40: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

VT PV = (AX - B)

T P(AX - B)

=[ (AX)

T - BT ]P(AX - B)

= (XT AT - B

T) P(AX - B)

= (XTAT P - B T

P) (AX - B)

= X T AT PAX - XT AT PB - B

T PAX + BT PB

= XTAT PAX - X

T ATPB - X T A

T PB + BT PB

= XTAT PAX - 2X T

A T PB BT ?B (3.16)

[from matrix algebra, (AX)T

= XTAT and B T PAX = X

TAT PB]

The minimum of this function can be found by taking

the partial derivatives of the function with respect to each

unknown variable (i.e., with respect to the x]

, x2 # • • •

x m ) must equal zero. Hence,

3_(VT PV) = 2A T PAX - 2AT PB = (3.17)dx

Dividing Equation (3.17) by 2, the following result

is obtained:

AT PAX = ATPB

This represents the normal equations, and by multi-

plying this equation by (A PA) -1, the solution is obtained:

X = (AT PA)-*AT PB (3.18)

For uncorrelated observations with equal precision,

the weight matrix is an identity matrix, and equation (3.18)

becomes

X = (AT A)-iAT B (3.19)

This equation can be derived similarly to the

unequal precision case. Equations (3.18) and (3.19) are the

basic least squares matrix equations.i,

33

Page 41: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

If the relations are nonlinear, the relations must

be converted into the linear form by using Taylor's series

expansion [Eef. 3, p. 919]. Let F = f (x1

, x2 , m )

be the general observation equation that is a nonlinear

function. The Taylor's series expansion is

F = f (x°. , x* . . xV ) + If 8x,+ df 5x~ +

OX. Ox,+ Higher order terms

3f 5 mm

where x° , x2

, . are the approximate values of thel

/ «* 2' " ' * ~mvariables at which the function is evaluated. For the

traverse problems, an approximate value can be the

precalculated value, and Ox, , 8x2 , . . . 0x m can be the

corrections. The higher order terms in the series are

neglected and only the zero and first order terms are

maintained, the approximate value must be improved by

successive iterations until the effect of the neglected

higher order terms is minimized. After linearization, the

observation equations become:

r

1= f, (*°, ) 3LJi 6 x

1+ 3f

t5 x

2+ . . d f

15 xm- G

v2

= f2(x- # x°

2. m ) * Q f2^ x

i* ^ f

2Sx

2^

3

m

Z f 9 5x - g

9x ™m

'

n= f

n (*\. x°2

, . . x°m )+ lfn 5x1+ ^fn 5x 2

+

3x°, 3x*^fn 5 ^m- G n

m

or in the matrix form

V = AX - B (3.20)

34

Page 42: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

where

A =

If, ?£,

if 2 jf

"9 x , 3 x°

3f.

m

^ I.

m

V =

V1

B =

G1

~ £1 v

X! / X 2

'

G^ — to (X. / x o '

G n " f n (x °» ^z

X' )m '

•*°m >m

X =

5 x1

The remainder of the least squares procedure is the

same as indicated by Equations (3.16) to (3.19).

There are two types of observation equations for the

adjustment of the traverse. They are the angle and distance

observation equations. Both of them are nonlinear, and they

must be linearized using the Taylor's series.

To derive the observation equation for the angle ct.i

(Figure 3.1), first write the two azimuth observation

equations for the azimuth Az-kand Az

;

. , where Az;l,

is the

back azimuth and- Az.. is the forward azimuth.U

E w - E:

Az.,, = arc tan -

ik

ik

Az.. = arc tan

Nk-N;

N« - N.J i

35

Page 43: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

Than, the angle observation equation for the angle ct- is

v. = Az. .- Az., - a.

i i j i k i

= arc tan -r?—zr~ - arc tan -r^—rr1- ~ °^

J (3.2 1)

Ji k i

Equation (3.21) is nonlinear in the parameters.

Write this equation in function focm:

v. = f. (E- , N. , E; , N. , E,, N. )

- d.i i

vi

r i* j'

j' k k '

i

Thus, the linearized form of the angle observation

equation is

v. = f; (E], V], E). *). E°, N°k

) * 3f. Se, *|JjSh;

^f. SB- *3f;6N; +3f.8E, BfrSlT - d-3 E; ?N] ^E

k-3N

k

The observation equation for the distance d« between

two points i and j is

v. = [ (E1

- Ej)« + (N, - H.) 2]i/2 - d;

or in the functional form

V; = f; (Ej. K;, Ej, Bj ) - d-

Thus, the linearized form of the distance

observation equation is

V; = f;(E;, N°;

, Z), B) ) * ^ffSE; + Al ;5 H

j

i

INi

3 f; Se- ^ f; 5N. " d;

3E°; ^N°J

J J

For the adjustment of the traverse which was

conducted at Moss Landing with the technique of adjustment

of indirect observations, four angle and three distance

36

Page 44: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

observation equations need to be written. The seven equa-

tions would include as unknown parameters the four coordi-

nates of stations 2 (Mossback) and 3 (Dune Temp) - Four

normal equations are formed and solved for corrections to

the approximate values (precalculated values) of the parame-

ters. The corrections are added to the approximations to

update their values, and the solution is repeated until the

last set of corrections is insignificantly small.

The linearized equations of this problems are

V1

= a n 5E2

+ a!25N

2 *dl3

6E3

+ d l4 5N3

" b1

v2

= a2i

6E2

a22

SN2

a23

5E3

+ a^S^ - b2

v?

= ayiSE

2a?25N

2ay 3

5e3

* a ?4 6n3

- b?

The zero order terms of the angle and distance

functions are

E°o-Ef

1 = arC tan N%1

f_ = arc tan tttN3 - N^

- AZ,

- arc tan El - E2Nt - N°2

f3

= arc tan N _r

f4

= AzL

- arc tanN?

*

E4~ E°3 E2- E3- arc tan

N°2- N°

3

f . = [ (E. - E2 )2 (N. - N? ) 2]211/2

f = [ (e 2- e\ ) 2 + (n; - n; )

2]1 /2

f7

= [ (E3

- E4 )2 + (N

3- N4 , 2] 1 /2

By using the data of the known coordinates (Table II) and

the approximate values (Table VII)

-2x, -11

3e°N2 - N

1

^N°- N^ 2+- (E

2- E

1)

2j

= 0. 68246 x 10-3

37

Page 45: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

I

12

•1 3

•1 4

•21

= 11,^3

=

=

= ^2 = -

E 9 - E

lCn'-N^ 2-!- (Ej- e

1)

2

0. 16550 x 10-3

^E°-

N 3 - N 2

l(n;-n;)2

+. (e3-e°

2)

2

»1 " »2

i N 1- N°2 )

2 + (E1- £°

2 )2

-

'22

3.06868 x 10-3

o o

E 3 - E 2=U 2=

liN3~ N °2

)2 + (E °3~ E°2 )2

Ei - E-

L(Nf N°2)2 +, (El - E°

2)

:

= 1.16926 x 10-3

l 23 ll 2= Nt - N^ 1 = 2.38621 x 10-3

- M° ^2 o ,2^3- Nu

2)^ 4- (EX- E°„)

'24

31

= 3f2

= "

= 1 f3

= -

^E°2

E3 - Epi^2(N

3-N

2)^ 4- (E°

3- E

2)2

N 2 - Nii°_m° ^2[(N2-N

3)^ +- (E°

2-E

3)'

= - 1.33476 x 10-3

= 2.38621 x 10-3

32 =ll3 = Ep - E

(N°2-N°

3)2 +(E °-E

3)2

= - 1.33476 x 10-3

'33 =AI3= -

*E%Ua ~ N

(N - N° )2 ME - E° )

2u 4 j 4 j

"2 - S3

(N°2-N

3)2

f- (E2-E°

3)

2

= - 2.50541 x 10-3

34 =if3= Ea - E-

"4 "3

= 1.43291 x 10-3

n;) 2 f (E4- E

3)

2

E 2 - E 3

JN°2-N°

3)2 +-(E°

2-E

3)

2

38

Page 46: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

a . = dt A =41

dE°

4 23n°

2

=

a . =?1 = -43

^E-

N, - N.

iJnJ-n )2+<e'-e 4 )

2

= 0.11920 x 10-3

4 4-*1

4=

3N?E-, - E, = - 0.09816 x 10-3

l

(N3-N

4)

2+-(E

3- E 4 )

2_

•51 Ej - E 2

_[(Er E°2

)

; :N1- N °2 )2]

1/2

= - 235.67466 x 10-3

a_ = 3f. = -52 3N C

Nt - N2

£(E,- E°2 )

2-f-(N

1-N 8

2 )2]V2

= 971.83201 x 10-3

53= df - =

a. .= 3f e =

54dhi°

a., = 3f =61

'62

3e°

= 3f. =

go - E 3

o .

3n

[(E'-E^)2 -MN

2-N

3;

o o

N 2 - N3

2 11/2

2 [(E'-El) 2 ^(N'-Nl) 2]

1 ^2 3

= - 488. 17948 x 10-3

= - 872.74326 x 10-3

a_ = 3f c = -63

9e°

E 2 " E °3

I(E 2 -E°3)2 +(N

2-N

3 )2]1/

= 488.17948 x 10"3

643n°

N 2 - N3

5Z^ e;)2 +(n;-n o

•2 -3' '2 3'

= 872.74326 x 1-3

a_ = af-, =71

3E°o

"72= _3f 7 =

39

Page 47: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

0E°3

74 =f*7

"

E 3 - E

L[(E3-E 4)

2 ^(N3-N4

)

N°3 ' N4

2 11/2

[(E3-E

4) 4-(N

3-N

4)

or in the matrix form

2J1/2

= - 635.68254 x 10-3

= - 771. 95059 x 10-3

A = 10-3

0.68246

-3.06868

2.38621

0.00000

-235.67466

0.16550

1. 16926

-1.33476

0.00000

971.83201

-448. 17948 -872.74326

0.00000

2.38621

-2.50541

0. 11920

0.00000

488.17948

0.00000 0.00000 -635.68254

0. 00000

-1. 33476

1.43291

-0.09816

0.00000

872.74326

-771.95059

The computation of B matrix, by using the data

from Tables II, III, IV, and VII

= d1

- f1

=

d2" f2

=

= C*3- f

3=

= CL - f =4 L

4

- f5 "= d

= d. - fs

=

0.00000 radians

0.00000 radians

0.00002 radians

0.00002 radians

0.00000 meters

0.00000 meters

= d3

- f 7= -0.01426 meters

or in the matrix form

BT

= [ 0.00002 0.00002 -0.01426 ]

The weight matrix can be computed by using the vari-

ance of the observed angles and distances from Tables III

and IV by applying to Equation (3.13). For uncorr elated

observations of unequal precision, the weight matrix is

defined as the diagonal ? matrix.

40

Page 48: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

'1

1

•22

333D'44

D' 55D

'66

77

1 / sins (1.984")

1 / sin* (1.405")

1 / sin2 (1.203")

1 / sin2 (1.614")

1 / (0.001)2

1 / (0.001)2

1 / (0.003)2

10,808,537,426.79957

21,552,498,219.02474

29,398,082,997.43487

16,332,144,194.08730

1,000,000.00000

1,000,300. 00000

111,111.11111

For uncorrelated observations of unequal precision,

the values of A, B, and P matrices are applied to Equation

(3.18). The correction vector is found to be

5e2

= 0.01284

8n2

= 0.00336

5e3

= 0.01079

6n3

= 0.00495

The approximation values were improved by adding the

corrections to the first approximation values. The improved

approximation values after the first iteration are

E 2= 607,943.44238 + 0.01284 = 607,943.45522 m.

N2

= 4,073,939.74473 + 0.00336 = 4,073,939.74809 a.

E3

= 608,121.99110 + 0.01079 = 608,122.0 0189 m.

N3

= 4,074,258.94534 + 0.00495 = 4,074,2 58.95029 m.

Using these values, the solution is iterated. After the

second iteration, the correction vector is zero to six

decimal places, so the improved approximation values are

the final estimates of the coordinates.

For uncorrelated observations of equal precision,

the correction vector is found by solving Equation (3.19).

The correction vector after the first iteration is

X =

§ E.

5e.

5il

= 0.01756

= 0.00426

= 0.01660

= 0.00479

41

Page 49: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

The improved approximation values after the first iteration

are

607,943.44238 + 0.01756 607,943.45994 m.E2 =

N2

= 4,073,939.74473 0.00426 = 4,073,939.74899 a.

E3

= 608,121.99110 + 0.01660 = 608,122.0 0770 m.

N3

= 4,074,258.94534 + 0.00479 = 4,074,258.95013 m.

The solution is iterated by using these adjusted

values. The correction vector is zero to six decimal places

after the second iteration. These values are the final

estimates of the coordinates.

The standard deviation of an observation which has

unit weight can be found by the following equations, for

uncorrelated observations of unequal precision,

& = vT pyn _ m

1/2

for uncorrelated observations of equal precision,

0" = VT7

n -m1 /2

(3.2 2)

(3.23)

where n is the number of observation equations and m is the

number of unknowns [Eef. 7, p. 249]. After calculating the

best estimate values of the unknowns, the V matrix can be

computed from Equation (3.20).

The standard deviations of the best estimate values

foe the unknowns are then given by the following equations:

6.= 6. 1/2 (3. 24)

where 6- is the standard deviation of the ith adjusted

quantity. The quantity in the ith row of the X matrix, S--

is an element of the (AT PA) - 1 matrix for uncorrelated

observations of unequal precision. For uncorrelated

observations of equal precision, Sjj is an element of the

(AT A)-i matrix [ Ref - 7, p. 250].

42

Page 50: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

(AT PAJ~ 1 or {AT A)

- 1 =

21

'ml

'12

'22

'm2

'1m

7m

mm

The standard deviations of adjusted angles and

distances can be computed by the following equation:

6; = 6. Qi1 /2 (3.2 5)

where 6. is the standard deviations of the ith adjusted

quantity. The quantity in the ith row of the V matrix, Q-j

is an element of A (A PA) -1 AT matrix for uncorrelated

observations of unequal precision. For uncorrelated

observations of equal precision, Q-- is an element of the

A(AT A)-iAT matrix [Ref. 3, p. 912].

A(AT PA) -iAT

or

A(AT A) -1AT

Oil

Q 21

n1

«1S

Q 22

n2

•1n

2n

nn

A closed traverse was conducted at Moss Landing.

After the second iteration, the V matrix can be found by

applying the values of A, B, and X matrices to Equation

(3.20).

43

Page 51: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

For uncorr elated observations of unequal precision,

ths V matrix is found to be

V =

ai

Va2

Va3

7a4Vdl

Vd2

d3

0.93149 x 10-s radians or 1.92134"

-1.63120 x 10-s radians or -3.36459"

-1.28363 x 10-5 radians or -2.64768"

-2.30436 x 10-s radians or -4.75308"

0.00024 meters

0.00039 meters

0.00358 meters

The standard deviation of unit weight is found by solving

Equation (3.22), the result is

6 = ± 2.69685a

The values of (AT PA)- 1 are

10-s

1.25 178

0.22019

1.25575

0. 10788

0. 22019

0. 13819

0. 21810

0. 1 1127

1.25575

0.21810

1.46408

0. 03315

0.10788

0. 11127

0.03815

0.22515

The standard deviations of the best estimate values for

positions can be found by solving Equation (3.24), the

results are

E2~

>N2 =

'E3 =

N3

± 0.00954 meters

± 0.0031

7

meters

± 0.01032 meters

± 0.00405 meters

44

Page 52: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

The values of A(AT PA)- 1 AT are

^0.064 -0.052 -0.021 0.010 -4.165 -6.963 -63.38

-0.052 0.225-0.175 0.002 3.415 4.690 41.59

-0.021 -0.175 0.211 -0.014 2.563 3.574 31.79

0.010 0.002 -0.014 0.002 -1.813 -1.301 -9.50 1

-4.165 3.415 2.563 -1.313 9917 -117.4 -1047

-6.963 4.690 3.574 -1.301 -117.4 9830 -1525

-63.38 41.59 31.79 -9.501 -1047 -1525 76323

The standard deviations of adjusted angles and distances are

found by solving Equation (3.25) , the results are

;ai = ± 1.40346

da2 = ± 2-64103

<3a3 = ± 2.55260

<5a4 = ± 0.26137

d,, = ± 0.00269

662

= ± 0.00267

6d3

= ± 0.00745

seconds

seconds

seconds

seconds

meters

meters

meters

For uncorrelated observations of equal precision,

the V matrix is found to be

V =

ai

7a2

Va3

7d1

7d27d3

= 1.26896 x 10-s radians or 2.61742"

= -1.56893 x 10-s radians or -3.23615"

= -1.75414 x 10-s radians or -3.61817"

= -2.23358 x 10- 5 radians or -4.60710"

= 0.14037 x 10~ 7 meters

= 0.23844 x 10- 7 meters

= 0.24365 x 10-7 meters

The standard deviation of unit weight is found by

solving Equation (3.23), the result is

tf = ± 2.01 144 x 10-s

45

Page 53: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

The values of (AT A)- 1 are

0.28193 0.06827 -0.85449 0.70380

0.06827 0.01664 -0.20731 0.17075

-0.85449 -0.20731 2.59561 -2.13724

0.70380 0.17075 -2.13724 1.75999

Ths standard deviations of the best estimate values for

positions can be found by solving Equation (3.24), the

results are

^E2 = ± °* 00 107 meters

tfN2 = ± 0.00026 meters

C5E3 = ± 0.00324 meters

= ± 0.00267 metersN3

T _i*TThe values of A (A A) _1 A are

1.472 -27.197 26.960 -1.235 -0.518 -0.343 -0.356

-27.197 503.1 -498.7 22.855 0.348 0.480 0.473

26.960 -498.7 494.4 -22.66 0.370 0.523 0.518

-1.235 22.855 -22.66 1.038 -0.201 -0.159 -0.134

-0.518 0.348 0.370 -0.201 10000 -0.001 -0.001

-0.843 0.480 0.523 -0.159 -0.001 10000 -0.001

-0.856 0.473 0.518 -0.134 -0.001 -0.001 10000

The standard deviations of adjusted angles and distances are

found by solving Equation (3.25) , the results are

^a i - ± 0.15917 seconds

^a2 = ± 2.94270 seconds

^a3 = ± 2.91732 seconds

a4 = ± 0.13370 seconds

^di = ± 0.00002 meters

'd2

5d3

= ± 0.00002 meters

= ± 0.00002 meters

46

Page 54: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

The computations in this subsection were performed

by the NPS IBM 3033 computer using 16 decimal places and

were rounded off to 5 decimal places prior to output.

3 . Least Squares Adjust ment by_ the Con dit ion Squat ion

Method

The general principle of least squares adjustment by

the condition equation method in surveying is

to minimize a function consisting of the sum of thesquares of the corrections to the observations plus thenecessary mathematical conditions involving some or allthe corrections; each condition by itself is made equalto zero bv adding the corrections to the discrepancydetermined from a pread justed calculation (i.e. calculatedfrom the observed values, rather than from adjustedvalues); thus, the magnitude of the sum of tha squares isnot changed by adding conditions [Ref. 3].

For uncorrelated observations of unequal precision,

the principle condition of least squares function may be

expressed in matrix form as follows:

= 7T P7

= 7T P7

= 7T PV

= 7T PV

= 7T P7

2K[ B7 + ff ]

2[B7 + ff ]T K

2[ (B7)T S T ]K

2[7T BT + W T ]K

27T BT K 2HT K

= minimum

where D is the least squares function matrix, K is a matrix

of Lagrange multipliers, P is the weight matrix, V is the

correction vector, B is the constant coefficients of the

corrections, and W is the precalcula ted discrepancy

[Ref. 9], It is numerically more convenient for later

development to multiply by 2. Taking the partial

derivatives of the a matrix with respect to each of the

corrections and equating to zero leads to

U7

Page 55: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

2_? = 2PV - 2BT K =

3Vor

7 = P-1BT K (3.26)

This equation is called a correlate equation or correlate

equation matrix. The solution of the Lagrange multipliers

matrix can be derived by multiplying Equation (3.26) by the

B matrix then adding the V matrix

BV W = BP-iBT K R

(B7 + W) is the condition equation matrix which must equal

zero. The solution of the Lagrange multiplier vector is

BP-iBT K = -H

K = (BP-iB1)-i (-17) (3. 27)

The correction vector is derived by substituting

Equation (3.27) into Equation (3.26)

V = P~iBT (BP-iB7 )-! (-W) (3.28)

For uncorrelated observations of equal precision,

the correction vector can be derived similarly to the

unequal precision case or by using the inverse of the weight

matrix which is the identity matrix. Equation (3.28)

becomes

V = BT (BBT )~i (-W) (3.29)

Closed traverse station positions may be adjusted by

using the technique of least squares adjustment by the

Condition Equation Method. There are two condition equa-

tions. They are the azimuth and coordinate condition equa-

tions. The coordinate condition equations are divided into

two parts, which are E and N coordinate condition equations.

48

Page 56: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

The azimuth condition equation is the sum of the

corrections to the angles in a traverse plus a precalcula ted

discrepancy W1

(Equation 3.6) which must equal zero. Where

v • equals the corrections to the angles, the general equa-

tion can be written;

lv,or

+ W. =at 1

i : 1

n n-1

A*ai + ^°- Vd!

+ S1

= ° <3 - 30 >

1=1 i = 1

where v.- is the correction to the distances. However,d i

this term equals zero and does not effect the equation, but

it does reserve space in matrix notation for distance

corrections. A closed traverse which was conducted at Moss

Laading can be written with an aziauth condition of

1.v +1.v + 1 - v , + 1 - v . . v . . +0.7. + . v , .,

a1 a2 a3 a4 d1 d2 d3

+ W^ = (3.31)

where the precalcula ted discrepancy (Wj) is +3.844" or

+0.00004288 radians.

The simple linearized form of an E coordinate condi-

tion equation is the sum of the adjusted departures and must

equal zero. 3y applying Equations (3.2) and (3.7), the

general formula for E coordinate condition equation isn-1

]>(d;

+ vd

. ) sin Aza[

- (ET

- E,) = (3.32)

u '

r 1

wherei

Aza|

= Azp

^_{dj

vaj )

- (i - 1)180° (3.33)

i = 1

Aza ;

is the adjusted azimuth. 3y using Equations (3.32) and

(3.33) with the data conducted at [loss Landing, these

equations become

(d1

+ vd1 ).sin Az

a1+ (d

2+ vd2 ).sin Aza2

+ (d 3 + vd3 )-sin Aza3

- (ET

- E1

) =0 (3.34)

49

Page 57: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

where

Azal

= AZF * d

i

+ Vai

= AZi + va i

AZa2

= AZF * d

1

+ Va1

+ *2 + Va2 " 180 °

AZ2

+ Va1

+ Va2

Az a3= Az F

+ d1

Tal

* cl2

va2

d 3+ va3- 360O

= Az3 * V

a1+ V

a2+ V

a3

Azj is the precalculated azimuth or unadjusted

azimuth (Equation 3.1).

From trigonometry

sin ( A +AA ) = sin A.cosAA cos A.sinAA

in which Aa is a very small angle in radians, let

cosAA = 1 and sinAA = AA

therefore,

sin ( A + AA ) = sin A + Aa.cos A

from the first term of Equation (3.34)

(d, + vd1 Jsin Az a1

= (d1

+ vd1

)sin (l Zl + va1 )

= (d1

+ vd1

)[sin Az1

+ va1

cos Az1 ]

= d1sin Az

1+ v . d

1cos Az-| + v_ sin AZj + v.

1v

^cos Az

1

(3.35)

(v .v ) is very small, by letting this term equal zero,

Equation (3.35) becomes

( d i+ v

d1 ) sin Azai

= d. sin Az. + v , d„ cos Az. + v.. sin Az. (3.36)i l 3ii i a i I

50

Page 58: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

The second and third terms of Equation (3.34) can be derived

similar to Equation (3.36), so

(d2

+ vd2 )sin Aza2

= d2sin Az

2(v

a1va2

)d2cos Az

2+ v

d2sin Az

2(3.37)

(d3

+ vd3)sin Az

a3

= d3sin Az

3+ (v

a1+v

a2+v

g 3) d

3cos Az

3+ v

d3sin Az

3 (3.33)

Substituting Equations (3.36), (3.37), and (3. 38)

into Equation (3.34) and rearranging terms

va1 (d1cos Az-i + d

2cos Az

2* d

3cos Az

3 )

+ v2

(d2cos Az

2+ d

3cos Az

3) va3 d

3cos Az

3

+ v sin Az. + v^.sin Az v ._ sin Az_di I a 2 d aj J

+ d1sin Az

1+ d

2sin Az

2+ d

3sin Az

3- (E T

- E.,) =

This equation can be written in the general formula asn-1 n-1 n-1 n -1

2< val 2 d

kcos Az

k>+ 2^di

sin Az. + ]>d. sin azj

I Z 1 k= i « = 1j ; 1

- (2T

- E,) =0 (3.39)

substituting Equations (3.2), (3.3), and (3.7) into Equation

(3.39)

n-1 n-1 n-1

(vai JAN.) + 3>H .sin Az. + » 9= (3.40)ai ^-

l

^->

k' .^— di i 2I = 1 k:l I = 1

For example, if the number of the observed angles (n) at

Moss Landing is four, this equation can be expanded to

*al (A»i + An 2 *An

3) + v

a2 (AN2

+ An3

)va3 AN 3

vd1

sin Az1

+ v sin Az2

« v sin Az3

+ 5?2

=

51

Page 59: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

Substituting the numerical values from the precalculat ed of

this traverse into this equation, the result is

(6702.37612) v, + (53 18.48345)

v

n9 + (4999 . 28 284) v , + O.vv ' ai ' ' a* * a3 a 4

-(0.23567) v + (0.48818) vd2

+ (0. 63570) vd3

+ »2

= (3.41)

where the precalcula ted discrepancy (57 ) is 0.08608 m and

O.v is equal to zero, which does not effect this equation,

but space is reserved in matrix notation for tha last angle

correction.

The N coordinate condition equation is the sum of

the adjusted latitudes and must eqaal zero. By applying

Equations (3.3) and (3.7), the general condition equation is

n-1

i = 1

(d. + vdi ) cos Az - (NT

- N,) =

This equation can be derived similarly to the S coordinate

condition equation case, resulting inn-

1

n-1 n-1

"Svaf]>AE k) 2*

d;C0S Az. W

3= (3.42)

1=1 kzl ir1

From the data acquired at Moss Landing, this equation can

be expanded to

-va1 (Ae

1+Ae

2+Ae

3)

- va2 (Ae2*Ae

3) va3 Ae 3

v cos Az, v „ cos Az + v cos Az- + W-, =d 1 1 d2 2 d3 3-1

Substituting the numerical values from the calculation of

this traverse into this equation, the result is

-(3959.89460) va1

- (4 295. 49626) va 7 ( 4 1 1 6. 94755) v

a3+ 0.v

4

+ (0.97183)v + (0.87274) v + (0. 77 1 94) v ._ + W-, = (3.43)d1 d 2 Qj->

where the precalcula ted discrepancy (W3 ) is -0.08936 m.

52

Page 60: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

Equations (3.30), (3.40), and (3.42) can be written

in the matrix form as (BV + W) , where 3 is the constant

coefficients of the corrections, V is the correction vector

which is composed of the angle and distance corrections, W

is the precalculated discrepancy. Equations (3.31), (3.4 1),

and (3.43) are written in matrix form as

BT =

1 6702.37612

1 5318.48345

1 4999.28284

1 0.00000

-0.23567

0.48818

0.63570

-3959.89460

-4295.49626

-41 16-94755

0.00300

0.97183

0.87274

0.77194

r

V =

¥a1

7a2

'a 3

"a 4

di

7d2

d3

-W =

-W1

= -0. 00004

-W2

= -0. 08608

-W, = 0.08936

For uncorr elated observations of unequal precision,

the inverse of the weight matrix is the diagonal matrix,

which is equal to the observation's variance. The diagonal

elements of the inverse of the weight matrix is

p-i = sin* (1.984") = 0.92519 x 10-»o11

p-* = sin* (1.405") = 0.46398 x 10-*°2 2

p-i = sin2(1.203") = 0.34016 x 10~*°r33

p-i = sin2(1.614") = 0.61229 x 10-*°44

p-» = (0.001)2

p-i = (0.001) 2

66

p-i = (0.003)277

= 0.10000 x 10-s

= 0.10000 x 10-s

= 0.90000 x 10-s

53

Page 61: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

For uncorr elated observations of unequal precision,

the correction vector is found by solving Equation (3.28)

V =

'a1

'a2

'a 3

'a 4

dl

762

'd3

= 0.93141 x 10-5 radians or 1.92117"

= -1.63114 x 10- 5 radians or -3.36446"

= -1.28358 x 10-s radians or -2.64758"

= -2.30438 x 10-s radians or -4.75312"

= 0.00024 meters

= 0.00039 meters

= 0.00357 meters

The corrected angles are

C*1 = 246° 05' 45. 12117"

a 222° 51' 05.23554"

Ck3

= 190O 14' 59. 95242"

OL = 2770 05' 12.24688"4

The corrected distances are

d-, = 1424.00424 m.

d 2= 365.74439 m.

d 3= 6476.27457 m.

Using the corrected data to recompute the coorlinates is

similar to the initial traverse computations. The adjusted

coordinates are

E2

= 607,943.45521

= 4,073,939.74809

608,122.00139

= 4,074,258.95029

612,238.85256

= 4,079,258.31754

N,

N.

S

m

.

m.

m.

m.

m.

m.

The last adjusted coordinates are the same values as the

fixed coordinates. Hence, it is not necessary to iterate.

For uncorrelated observations with equal precision, the

correction vector is found by solving Equation (3.29)

54

Page 62: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

V =

V

"al

7a3

'a 4

d1

7d2

7d3

1.26884 x 10-s

-1.56886 x 10- s

-1.75408 x 10-s

-2.23360 x 10-s

0. 14034 x 10" 7

0.23842 x 10" 7

0.24362 x 10- 7

radians or 2.61717"

radians or -3. 23601"

radians or -3. 61804"

radians or -4.60713"

meters

meters

meters

The corrected angles are

C^l = 246° 05 1 45. 81717"

OU = 2220 51 i 05.36399"

oc. = 190O 14' 58.98196"

C*4

= 2770 05 » 12.39287"

The corrected distances are

a, = 1424.00400 m.

d2

= 365.74400 m.

a = 6476.27100 m.

By using the corrected data to recompute the coordinates,

the adjusted coordinates are

E2

= 607,943.45994 m.

N2

= 4,073,939.74899 m.

E3

= 608,122.00770 m.

N3

= 4,074,258.95013 m.

E4

= 612,238.85256 m.

N4

= 4,079,258.31754 m.

The last adjusted coordinates are the same values as the

fixed coordinates. Hence, it is not necessary to iterate.

55

Page 63: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

The standard deviation of an observation which has

unit weight can be found by the following equations. For

uncorrelated observations of unequal precision,

6. = VT PV 1 /2 (3.44)

and, for uncorrelated observations of equal precision,

C5. = 7TV 1 /2 (3.45)

where r is the number of condition equations. There are

three condition equations for a closed traverse (r=3). The

standard deviations of adjusted angles and distances can be

found by the following equation:

6. = 6oj_Q;Jl ' 2 (3.46)

where 6- is the standard deviation of the ith adjusted

quantity. The quantity in the ith row of the V matrix, Q--

is an element of the P- 1 - P- 1 B (BP- 1 BT

)- 1 BP- 1 matrix for

uncorrelated observations of unequal precision

[Ref. 3, p. 918]. For uncorrelated observations of equal

precision, Q;j is the element of the I - B (BB~)- X B matrix

The matrix P-i - P-i

B

T (BP-iBT )-iBP-i or the matrix

I - 3T

(BE T)-iB is equal to

Q11

Q 21

1 2

22

Qln

22n

Qnl Qn2 Qnn

56

Page 64: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

For uncorr elated observations of unequal precision,

the standard deviation of unit weight is found by solving

Equation (3.44), the result is

<5o

= ± 2.69679

The results of P- 1 - P-i3T (BP-i3T) -» BP-* are

10-io

0.064 -0.052 -0.021 0.010 -4.165 -6.963 -63.88

0.052 0.225-0.175 0.002 3.415 4.639 41.59

0.021 -0.175 0.211 -0.014 2.563 3.574 31.79

0.010 0.002 -0.014 0.002 -1.813 -1.301 -9.500

•4.165 3.415 2.563 -1.313 9917 -117.4 -1047

•6.963 4.689 3.574 -1.301 -117.4 9830 -1525

•63.88 41.59 31.79 -9.500 -1047 -1525 76323

The standard deviations of adjusted angles and distances are

found by solving Equation (3.46) ; the results are

<5a1

= ± 1.40340 seconds

6a2 = ± 2.64096 seconds

Oa 3 = ± 2.55253 seconds

(5a4 = ± 0.26136 seconds

<3d1= ± 0.00269 meters

662 = ± 0.00267 meters

663 = ± 0.00745 meters

Foe uncorrelated observations of equal precision, the

standard deviation of unit weight is found by solving

Equation (3.45), the result is

tf = ± 2.0 1139 x 10-s

57

Page 65: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

The results of I - 3 T (BBT )—*B are

10-3

1.472 -27.199 26.962 -1.235 -0.518 -0.843 -0.856

-27.199 503.1 -498.7 22.855 0.348 0.480 0.473

26.962 -498.7 494.4 -22.66 0.370 0.523 0.518

-1.235 22.855 -22.66 1.038 -0.201 -0.159 -0.134

-0.513 0.348 0.370 -0.201 10000 -0.001 -0.001

-0.843 0.480 0.523 -0.159 -0.001 10000 -0.001

-0.356 0.473 0.518 -0.134 -0.001 -0.001 10000

The standard deviations of adjusted angles and distances are

found by solving Equation (3.46) ; the results are

tfa i= ± 0.15918 seconds

<5a2 = ± 2.94262 seconds

(5a3 = ± 2-91722 seconds

<5a 4= ± 0.13369 seconds

6dl = ± 0.00002 meters

^d2 = ± 0.00002 meters

<5d3 = ± 0.00002 meters

The computations in this subsection were also

performed on the NPS IBM 3033 computer; they used 16 decimal

places, and were rounded off to 5 decimal places in the

final solutions. These are more decimal places than are

normally used in practice because such precisions are not

generally attainable by corresponding observations.

However, in comparing two computational methods that are

theoretically equal, one method may be more sensitive to

round off error than the other. This will be commented on

in the next chapter.

58

Page 66: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

IV. DISCUSSIONS AND ANALYSIS g_F RESULTS

Three programs were used to compute the initial traverse

and adjust tha closed traverse station positions. Programs

1 , 2, and 3 were used to compute and adjust the traverse

station positions by the Approximate Method, the Indirect

Observations Method, and the Condition Equation Method,

respectively. The programs were written in W'ATFIV language

for implementation on the NPS IBM 3033 computer. The

computer output and listings of Programs 1, 2, and 3 are

provided in Appendices A, B, and C, respectively. The

maximum number of intermediate traverse station positions

that can be computed and adjusted by these programs is 30.

The programs were tested using several fictitious data sets

to ensure their performance in handling the various

intermediate traverse station positions.

The computer storage area and CPU time of Programs 1, 2,

and 3 has been compared (Table X). The adjustment of a

closed traverse by the Approximate Method did not use a

weight matrix in the matrix computations. The computer

program for this method was written by using the variables

in only one dimension for storage of both data and results.

This method did not require any iterations. Tha least

squares adjustment of a closed traverse characteristically

is used to simultaneously eliminate closing errors in

azimuths and distances, and Programs 2 and 3 both utilized

such an adjustment. The computation by either Least Squares

Method used matrices in two dimensions to compute the

correction vector. Likewise the computer programs were

written using variables in two dimensions. Included are all

subroutines from Program 1 and extra subroutines for each

individual program. Therefore, both Programs 2 and 3 used

more computer storage area and CPU time than Program 1.

59

Page 67: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

w

CD

Eh

4-1

O

03

e•HEh

E=>

a.

U

C

n

cumenit1t3

U CO *4->

CO »«N

P0) *Pi-

CuO)s sO fd

en0) oJ3 P4JCu

c03

*+J

CD

CQ

WcowHP<d

a.

Ou0)

-CEH

1

1

c3

03

-P

CO

u03

CO

1

3- CO ,_ O coCO i T— CN « T— r— • T—

m =r r- t . r*< m t • f r- f 1

vO^ cn

CN

T—r~

-f-"

cd CTl m ViJ LDu sr I • in t m vO in 3-

en CN r» *— r— CO T— • LT t

CO .. .. * T— CN t CN t—u r— »— =r I • .. ^" • • • •

Dm enCN

T— T— «—

1 ^D1 © r— m ^m CN »—

1

1

1

1

1

r~ insr r—

1 IT)

inCN

t • 1

• »-1

1

1 0)

1 c CN CN1 O • • • •

1 w 0) •p r" rn1 s e rrl fll -u1 in td 0) 03 (Tt U) 01

1 u P P P -P a s1 en en cd cd cd 01 cd ' 03

1 O o CI) u u1 p u P 0) O) o tn en

a, Oi rd encd

encd -p

op

op

«w 4-4 03 U p a. cu

o O cn o T3en a p 4-1 03 4-1 <w«u w 01 P 03 rn 01 4-> O oC 4-1 4-> o .. 03

cu c P p P T— p 3 03 03

B 03 O) 03 03 0) r—

i

£ £0/ e e -P T3 p H3 H •P4J 03 1) P 3 c 3 cd 4J +J(d +J M 03 Ou cd Cm+j td id -P S S p O s0) -p +j 3 o CN o CN o Cu cu

03 01 Q. u .. u • • m u U1 4-4 S r— PO

o 4H 4-1 O 4-1 4H i) ip 4h-

1 O m O u o 03 O 01 £ o O1 P • • e E •H1 0) o T— o i-H o rrt O rrl 4-> O O1 .fl •H •H (O •H P •H P •P •H1 B +J T3 +J +J P en 4J en 3 4-1 m 4-1

3 id C id o 03 O 03 O CU 03 • • 03

C p (d p p P PCm

p pCu

u P r" P

03 0) rg 03 cn 03 0) 03 03 03 ae! 03

-^ ^ • • -C • • -C J5 M-l -G m -C JH c -Cj

EH H r~ Eh m i-i H O Eh o Eh E^^ 03 H

1

1

,_ CN m rr LO vO r- CO•

ON1

1

1

1

1

60

Page 68: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

The Indirect Observations Method requires that the

number of observation equations be equal to the sum of

observation equations of both observed angles and distances.

The number of observation equations is not constant. It

changes depending on the number of the traverse stations--

this means that the row dimension of each matrix will change

depending on the number of observation equations.

Therefore, the subroutines affected by the number of trav-

erse stations are difficult to write in the general program.

The coefficients in the A matrix are computed by taking- the

partial derivatives of the functions with respect to each

unknown variable, where the number of unknown variables is

not constant. The number of unknown variables changes

depending on the number of the traverse stations.

Therefore, the subroutine for the computed A matrix is also

difficult to write in the general program. The Condition

Equations Method has only three equations which makes it

easier to derive the general form and write the computer

program. The adjustment using the Indirect Observations

Method does not apply the corrections to the observed values

directly; therefore, it requires the approximate values of

the unknown coordinates be computed for the correction

vector of the unknown coordinates. This method requires at

least two iterations to check the insignificance of the

correction vector when it is compared with an arbitrarily

selected small number. The adjusted coordinates from the

Condition Equations Method can be checked at the first iter-

ation. Thus, Program 3 is more economical as it uses less

computer storage area and CPU time than Program 2 (Table X) .

The closed traverse at Moss Landing originated and

terminated at control points with known positions which were

determined by third-order methods. The azimuth closure was

2.211" per station and the position closure was 1:66,617.

The classification, standards of accuracy, and general

61

Page 69: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

specifications for a third-order class I traverse (Table I)

indicate the azimuth closure is not to exceed 3" per station

and position closure must be better than 1:10,000. This

traverse met the specifications and standards of accuracy

for a third-order class I traverse.

Using Programs 1, 2, and 3, the traverse was computed

and adjusted in UTH grid coordinates. The final adjusted

coordinates were transformed from tJTM grid coordinates to

geographic coordinates [Ref. 4, pp. 319-321]. The differ-

ence between the coordinates for each method and NOS

[Ref. 10] have been computed (Table XI). The technique of

Least Squares for both methods yields identical computa-

tional results to at least five decimal places (Table XI,

Methods 3.1 and 4.1; 3.2 and 4.2). Least Squares provides

the best estimates for positions of all traverse stations.

Program 2 performs a statistical test, yielding the standard

deviations of both adjusted positions and observed values.

Conversely, Program 3 only yields the standard deviation of

adjusted observed values.- Comparisons of the standard devi-

ations of adjusted observed angles and distances were made

between these computed by the Indirect Observations Method

and the Condition Equations Method (Table XII) . The

computed standard deviations of the adjusted angles differed

significantly in the fourth decimal place in several cases,

which is a slight indication that the Indirect Observations

Method is more sensitive to round off error. The standard

deviation estimates are larger for the Indirect Observations

Method in every case of a significant difference in the

fourth decimal place. However, a significant difference in

the fourth decimal place is insignificant in terms of the

observational precision. The standard deviations of the

adjusted distances for both methods yield identical results

(Table XII). Both Methods differ from the NOS positions in

the fourth decimal place in seconds of arc for both latitude

62

Page 70: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

and longitude. The horizontal control for third-order stan-

dards requires accuracy to three decimal places in seconds

of arc for both latitude and longitude--thus, these methods

can be used for computing third-order positions.

63

Page 71: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

r- 3- =r at at m CO in CO nm on r- m r— m nn r- m r—

. o o O o O t o o O o OM-l o o o era o (4—1 o o o o OIH o o o o o '-M o o o o o•H s i • • t • • •H r I t • 1 t f

a o1

o4-

o4-

o+

o O o1

o+

o4-

c4-

o+

,_ rn St cn en cn en _,_ P* o en CN en CN• o m <o CO VO CO • UD o CN in CN m» en en co CO CO co CS: »- CN r— r— r- «—•*-• LO in in in m m *—

'

en en en cn cn enp» p~ p» r» p- p- rn nn nn m pn nn

(i) s • • t . • CI) " • . # a • •

n=l nn nn nn m nn rn rd ^o ^D UD ^o iC \D3 CN cn CN CN CN CN 3+J 4-1

•H „ P- p» P* P- p» p- H . p- r- P~ P~ P~ r*>

Cn a- at at at at 3" cn cr at =r =r at at3 cO O r- r— r- T— r— r~ O o «- »- r— T- r— r*^ CN CN CN CN CN CN hJ CN P4 CN CN CN CN

W r» cn cn CN cn Uj CO cn cc cn0> nn *— o T- o c m o o o O+J £ • o o o O o o • o o o o ord 0<4-J o o o o o •HU-4 o o o CD C 1

s •Hiu o era o era o 4JU-I o era en o o^ jJ-r-l r i • • • • ffl-r4 Z 1 • i • 1 »

T3 (TIC o o © o o 4-1 C, o © o o oH M 4-> 4- 1 1 i 1 w + i i 1 1

X O Wo on CM w* CN en Oj m r^ <— CN t— CN 1

W u -*—. m T— U3 in VO in e— »— p* CN CN CN CNJ u . r^- P- P- r» P- r* 0) • »— o r- »— r— r—co o <dr: Cn cn cn CT. cn en HZ CO CO co CO co CO<j •-H -Q^- o o O o o o —

m m <-n rn nn ^nEH -3 Cfl <U

cu tn a> LD in in m in in 3 0) in m in in IT inid Ot3 cn CM

*CN CN CN CN S'a m nn rn nn nn nn

u S3 ca aCr» 4-> - CO CD CO CO CO co 4-1 •> CO CO CO CO CO COO -P.H at a- at =r a at 4-l-H ^3- at at at =r ay

o> «C4-J <4Jo (« O v£> VO vO vo vo VO cd o ^O VO UD ^O KO \D

^ m m

c

m m

co

m rn

co

K^ m on

in

rn m

o

m nj

3I

O 1

o 3 •H C H o c •H c •H 1

•H w c o W •H W c o W4-1 •H •H o •H •H 4J •H H o •H H(d W u •H W U id M u •H w U> •H 0) 4-> •H 0) t> •H 0) 4J H 0) 1

u U u td U u u U M rd u U I

CD CD a. 3 0) cu QJ 0) a. 3 CD a.i

M (-4 cn l-l cn u cn U<B J a. H w CXi ^H 0) .a a. rH W a, H 1

+j O CO (ti 4J o cd 3 1

id r-< 3 c <-\ 3 Ifl I-) 3 c «—i 3 1

in £ +J 03 CJi o td CP to = 4J cd tr< o rd cn 1

w C •H u 3 cu •H 3 OJ W c •H u 3 0) •H 3 0) 1

no-

ss X 0) cn c 4-1 C1 c t3 2 X 0) Oi c 4J o-t 3 1

O o Ui w 3 •H w 3 o (-4 w 33 •H w 3) |

.3 • u •H T3 G) M •H ^C4-> CO Oi id r— CN 3 *— CN 4-> CO cu T3 »— CN Ch »— CN0) t O. 3 « 1 O • • <u t a. c t t o • •

sr 3 < H m m u =T =r s: E3 < H nn nn CJ at 3"

cn nn i- cm rn

64

Page 72: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

w-JCQ

En

03

Q>

(-1

(d

3enen

-P03

(TJ

CD

ip

O

03

-O•H

(d

H>CD

Q

U«j

idc(tJ

P00

0)

J3-P

a<u

cu

aPCD

CQ

03

ao03

>HU<d

a.sou0)

.3En

n

0)

3O•HP(rt

>PCD

03

.a

o(=!

O•H03

•HUCD

U

(0

3inCD

cED

<PO

03

3o

rd

•H>CD

atJu<d

T3C(d

•p

in

03

CD

U3fl3

P03

HQndCD

p03

3

LTl IT)

r» r-o o© ©

a

CD

P03

3•r-i

CN

m

CN

CN©-©

voCNOo

vO

CN

mIDCNLDin

3oH-Pcd

3

w

cn rsj

cn ©o r-3- sr

• t

CN CN

© M03" 3"

© ©

3o•HP>uCD

03

J3

03

ao

cd

>PCD

03

X)Oco

oCD

UCu

cd

3

W

<PQ

03

3O

cd

•H>CD

Q

Pcd

a(d

—cn

03

CD

U3id•p

03

0)

4-1

03

3•r~i

<N

03

CD

Cn n3

CD

P03

3 CN

13

CN CN<T3 O© O© © 1

o ©• •

© oCN CNO O© ©O O 1

© ©• •

© ©CN CN© ©© ©O O 1

© Ot t

o ©cn o ,_

uO r» ©rn m ©rn m ©t— i— ©

t • *

o © 1

CN CN ©CN rn r—P» r» Or- T— ©cn cn o

• • f

CN OJ 1

CN o covO r- oCN CN o=T 3" oO^ CT> o

t t •

cn CN 1

CO r« T*-

«— r- ocn cn oLO un or- «— o

• • •

o © +

O3 Ho -t->

•H <d

-p >cd p3 CD

CJ1 03

w .ao03 o CD 03 o CD

1

na 3 nd 3 Uo o p 3 O O p 3

1

.3 H u CD -3 H u CD

P -P CD P. -P p CD MCD •H U CD CD •H P, CD

s nd •H 4H S T3 •H 4Hc ID m 3 TD M-t

o 3 •H 3 H1

u H Q U H Q1

• t • •1

r— CN <~ CNI

65

Page 73: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

7. CONCLUSIONS AND HECOMiiEN DATION

A. CONCLUSIONS

The computer programs developed by the author and

contained in this -thesis have a variety of useful and prac-

tical hydrographic applications. In hydrography, geodetic

field work plays a key role- Horizontal control is neces-

sary in determining positions and, even in areas which

appear to initially have adequate control, additional

control stations often need to he established after arrival

in the field. These field-generated control points must be

adjusted to fit within the existing survey net am! to mini-

mize errors in the field Jie a surevents. The errors can be

minimized by these computer programs. Direct application of

these programs would be enormously beneficial, since no

eguivalent software exist at NPS to perform such adjustments

at the present time.

In the Approximate Method, a traverse is adjusted by

computations using a hand calculator. This method is suit-

able for field computation and the adjusted coordinates meet

the specifications and standards of accuracy for a third-

order class I traverse. Although the accuracy from this

method is less than the Least Squares Metnod, it does not

require a computer and it furnishes coordinates which can be

checked in the field by the field party.

The Least Squares Method provides the best estimates for

positions of all traverse stations. Least Squares does

require more of a computational effort than the Approximate

Method. However, the accuracy of Least Squares is better

than the Approximate Method, and the Least Squares Method

should be used for the final office computations. Both

66

Page 74: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

Least Squares Methods yield identical results, but the

Condition Equations Method is more economical aad easier to

derive than the Indirect Observations Method. Therefore,

the Condition Equations Method should be applied at HPS.

B. EECOHHENDATION

Studies should be continued at NPS to compare the

economy of adjustment methods used in this thesis with other

methods of least squares adjustment.

67

Page 75: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

OX OH X co >?xu* K- r- ro3" 00 <V r»- CO-It—

1

a • • •

rvl3I 2f00 m s0<ti«i c\i <\l • —< —

*

<r\

O x a •

oo c . O m t— 2: OK-l_l a:2" •—\ m 00 • • •

cy:o LLo •

cOO CO

o~> -^ _i

xc IC <r -^ >i- LLI ^- <f —

H

"< I-K- ^y* 00 O vf (*-

K X A A OX QL >- f\l

»-4 xr I 1 •—< UJ • • 1

OO .-o ari- K- vj- in -O

n Ma: (-i fNI CO 111/': UJ <M ^3 r*-

D.

u>*<U- Z >—

1

2!—4

2T x#O o# o ^- >ot—

>->» X O in

h- H# (—1 <r <N< •-<•& 1— u: vf in

K 00* O0O0 a: CO00O O-H- LL5< UJ * •

O a.-* 1— LU t- 0^ CO

LUX •«• <£ UJ r- m00 K- X# xo x 0S| (M • vf in en >d-

<r auj c-s- h-i»—

i

CO f\l a • 00 —1—4 ljx "-•»• Qc: —-4 — oo cr •J- fN >0

X ^> H-# O£(0 sO <f •« 00 % • • •

>—

t

2: <Tiu <•»• O »—« -^ —4 —4 —^

n < (tfh- 1- •»• a <«2 CC K-< oo* oo vj" Q*UJ o ar «• Z in « O OQ. o Oh -J-M- Qi- <N r^ Q-«- O OCL g: LUX <# »-'X to IT* —1 LU-M- O O< q. OOO H-* oil— a: CO m >•«• a O O

Oa: x# oc£ li< • t a:-* UJ <M •O s0

-JCL ' a-* o f— in 00 LU* >uj • • • t •

oc >>!•» xx UJ in in oo* ar_i 00 m CO <N f-

< ,-.-* i— x LO <NI CQ* LUO «t -H

u_ a:* XQ fNI 0^ a* OOXo>- o* »—

i

h- r- m<r t tn —

t

in un

CQ x# a: O a s; in -H

z # o *t >fa X-B- • <M O r*-

1—

1

3-». <r nj a> r-

h- o# rsj <N -H fNI

< x#_J Si*Xo 00 00_1 z X< O a

l-O »—

t

KHX 1— 1-Q.LU < <H-X 1— K-Dh 00 O0O

LL U- ^Q.X

CC O O O UJIU a: <M a: rsi < 1—

t— LU UJ z LU l'-l CO X3 2: X 00 3: < X X 00 00 UJ X <O- < CL 00 _i CC < Q. 00 00 *L. _j u.x x ^ O c X 1—

1

C X c Oo a X X 2: a. X X X Xo

nj ro

68

Page 76: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

t- XX U.' Ky en ai»—i 1—

1

Orsj 3 ^< i^

U 2:

Q O O»—

«

_J cccc u_O

X(- 1— XX2: Xt—

t

cfj a: a

CO

oo#X#o-h-

(-a-

co-H- r>j oi O —1 cm cm ro

0-#

O O O O OO O O O O

CO CO 00 CO CO CO co

r- r- r» r- r- h- r^-

0^ m ITi —

1

•H -4

sO LA m CO CO in—

*

—4 ~4 .—4 rn

CM CM ro m CO CO m<M (M —4 —

4

CM CM msQ <0 0^ 0* rj> O>t vO CM m l—> mm -H CM <N ^CM r-A m (M «* m in

A1

A A1

A1

A1

A1

A

m

X* o >j- co o mC-K- 2 O ro —t •Ot—|.jj. »—i -J- CM p—I CO»-«• t— 00 *r >r o m<•»• oo (/j cc o >* o> 0">

1— •»• UJ <t uj • • • •

oo-x- \— uj 1— ct^ m —• co

# < uj (s- -J- cm mai* x o 2: cm a> ^ <\i

O0-H- »—« 1—• CO P^ CO CNor- -a- Oct: o o o —

lu# 0:0 >0 vO -O vO>•» o<•« occ* 00 -O ro -4- 00

H-« x o r- m —

1

•» o >-i cm >* m coo* t-i x 00 n >4- -t <NUJ* or. k- or. CO 1^- o CMoo# o or. uj • • • •

o# n y- n o co co_i* 2:2: ULiin m m inO-H- I— 21 n CT> <M cm* x Q cm m vt- o>

u_* i-h • r~ h- r»» f*-

O* CC 0000a*UJ-*K*

X*O-H- 00-J* 2!<# Oo# •-•

LU* |-or.* <a.-)* 1—

00Q.

U- * 2!UJ

CM < HUJ CO2: U) 00 UJ< 00 (J)

~"

X a XX <_J CL'

o ax a x x

cm m >r in

69

00 00 00CCUJK-

>d- —

^

UJ-r -H y •

co CM IS)

• • O ccCO CM O LU r»

0^ 1— —*

-H UJ s0• • O X >oX X •

CO

OCMCO CM

11 11

00

a

a. O0 UJO Occ a; Xcc UJ <*.

UJ Q. h-00 CC

X CC »—i Oh- a a:X cc cr:

X CC UJ»—

1

UJ 1—

<

M err UJ >-

< X u(-- 23 <

_J X _l <r CC< X < 1- X1- >—

1

H 00O rvl O t-H

H- < h- Q <t

Page 77: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

n#X*(-•«

UJ-*\—»

2:*

><*o*

<xtt

>-«•

CO-W-«

00-H-

x-*o#

O0#o-m-

o*•-•a-

i-#<)<•

k--h-

oo-fr«•

LU-K-

oo-H-

c£#LLi-S-

>•«<•«a:*

#o-k-LU-H-

o*-J-H-

*

*

LU-H-

I--*00*X-*"5-H-

C-«-

XI-XUJ3-00

<^UDO

o

10H-l-X2:2:

<U_

(J)

K0000UJ<

<zo-<>—•

Qa:OTtOOOOO

2TQm•-•X

Oa:o

2TZ

XQ>—

1

(Xo

2T 00

o

c

COX

<00

u.oLUSI<

*t

>t00 >rccLU •

t- 0>

LU r-2: (NJ

CDOO

>o

OCM

00 mq£ CO

LU •

H- LOLU mX in

CMh-O~r

CM

0000a2:

O O O O O OO O O O O O

r^- 1*- O O in in •J"

vO O in in ^ ^ mr- r*- -^ -• in in m>t <f _ —

H

^ ~t >o•-i -^ •—

*

-* CM

<%i CM CO ro ao CO coCM CM f—> ^ CM CM en

>0 O o> cr 0^ 0» >o>t O (\| CO —

1

CDco ~4 CM CM i—i

CM p^ co CM >J- co mA1

A A A1

A1

A1

A1

1-4 (Nl <NI co CO

in.—

t

>t>*

CO

or-o-0

(OoCOCOr*-

COON

COr«-

o

o<CO0000o

CM

COCM

OO^0*

CM—4CO

o^o

oCMoCO

COinCM•4"

r*-

o

a.2:

xo

CO

inCMinco»

CO

COCMCM<-4

o

•4-

in

1

co

COinCMo>

o

2:_io

00

a

in

O0* ac

LU1-

LU• 2

2:O

CC Oa OCC Oa: • OLU a •

OLLLL

cQ 11 II

z.X

LUoi X O

h- —^ X <

2: 1—LU (—1 00X IVI •-H

< Q

70

Page 78: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

ooooouo.o.ao.D.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»O a.O Q.O a.O a.O a.

O Q.

O O o_O O CLO O Q.O O z a.O O a.

O 1—

t

a.O H CLO O < 0.O h- CLO O 00 CLO O CLO O UJ CLO O 00 CLO cc CLO UJ CL

u > CL< CL

CC CL1- CL

CLu_ CL

Q-CLCL

7* CL• a CLX l_> 1—

1

Cl.

H- H- ClCC <r Q-

-j • CL 00CC no Q- 2*h- 00 CL aZ. _jx CL M

f-4 < <»— CL H-<r X OUJ CL •—

1

Osf 2: CL Z> u 2100 cc CL »—

1

K-

1

DO^ Ouj CL IX.

IX. ^ <-. U-|" CL UJt~ < CL< UJ z - 2:2: CL3. X < <»-H a UJ

X-h CCX CL _Ja. <rH 00 CL CGa. 2 00 ace CL << *• > cca. a t»-t

> -H •_J a.a, CL cc< ST (-X <c 0. <x.

cc <* -J -) u < CL >\- 00 >- CL

• • •« O0 CO CL1—

1

CLO CCUJ 00 CLO Ch 002: CL

O x< mO CLO l-O X.-h CLO x K-H- CLO < »—i CLO to CLO O CLO CL CL

CQ O CL

O O CL~3 O CL

IX' Xa* 2IX

LULU CC i-ih-

oo> MX •

CtTt— z UJ <js:oo .

UJK 2 (-•xoo>o a CNCZ<< z z ct:<r»-ic> •>

cccc OO ^ 1—

1

<x t— •-< UlH-UJ UJ 2^»-t- IX'

h- _J IX. 00 ct:ooot-H a:ax CO c t IX! C<Ci^ •

Ull-H < 00 -J t U.CDQ.O Ul 2;00 1—

1

X 23 O UJ CL Q OOct: 0C • H- O X OCX h-<

_JC <oo • »—i • < «£. it;ujcz X h-

>XO0 002: l-ui < >—H-«-*D t—

I

<UJ OZ ^»—

<

t—iLt' O 1- • XXI- »- h-a:_i >t-.o Orvj 00 _l UJ 0000 ClCl<H- QC 00Oi- x(-»-< HH< OC > •-•CL X2TI-0: •O

IX. 2i~.t- •(- CLZ CC QUI OOoOH- XCC Q.XT XOOf-"00<XO < UJ l- OO OO <ra£ u;UJ<I onwzt-H 2 *Ut QUJ • U.I i-hIXJ a.CLl— O-CJOOOOi 2D? CC LU2TUJUJLUO0U.' Qo<r UJ CLiKH O ouj<to Ct 1LJXXaroO <TLU cr:

a IZ H-ai X>»- DZZH-i-u'ct: Qi_J OIX. K- Z2X<00lXJ S^aTOIXi 00 •—••< >LU • O OSo> 02(-a:i UJ<X < 1- ii 11 <>o:zz QC

00 • II XOoOUJI— U-OOCCl— UJUJim qc<X.Cj>—><£ UJZ Q ^2 > oco SUi^H-—^j_occt:o<a:oo ^x< n ox II ZO(NJ(\l H-Q-oC_l UJ•—tt— <3*--4UJ ~2.CC OC •-• U_< COrOU- UJO<t _JH<CriLUCl—

«

UJLU — C*)l—C Ou_ CcT 1

<QtDDl-i:X vf COOUJCM • 00UJ«—~- OL'ICCO •2!_J >Q H-^U_— X —irOQoii-icjCoooOO OLL'I—Q<Xc^UJ «»U- OoO XQC"0 ZUJQDNNZOZ Xuuj^2nxu_ o 2*luX'-ocei oo<r<r>-<x<ujLiiouj—1|— -H OOIXJLU CO<OOOXO<LLCOX>-'I—JlOl<ZJ20 X(X UJX OUJXUJUJUOI— I—OOO^—LUH-OUJOZOuj<m XXOX00XQC2 • «a:oo>-iX 00ZQmZIZQ hZUJ< X -^-^0<Q< II II

CCcs<— *»X>-i<r •> • > «-QLU00LLrM(M2^LU Q00x01— h-xuj-^oo 11 ujc<-zi<Qmn _j_iooxooLULUQCrHQiOO I>fZ XUJ(M<J— UJ QO«H<(\J

UJXO<LUl—^«O^I—OOrO XX«-.^t-n-H(_|_rvl ivj

zzkdzlui s:t-i>t co uj 11 DS2!oLo:ra<Li |<OO O I— II O^— 11 O-—\r- UJOOrvirviOOh-l— aiK-UJhi-iS -OO lui-hCM XXOX << XO > —I O »_J O CLCL CL cxl hhCOJHM II —O.O0I—<UJOXl— H-UJU-CO II II UJIX. -z -clclcoqcq: mMO<i-xzHZ xoo ixsmz.OOU.XOO— *OCL»-Xl—<XX II I— - •—«-»H I— Hlf\j

X tnc\j » 00X •• O —.—»f\irg m m00 o •• •• o ooco cl 11 11 x 11 11 ••m—. »o 11 -< o—< 11 (Niogmm 11 n < <

r\j rom uj uj

x -co >— - -I i/)OQmm ivjQ O

<T O l—O O Im Cl 1-4 2"»-!»-i<t<rLU 1—2^— Z\— 1—irvJi^la'OC <C^ f\|

QC 0X0 h-H cl »—O XdCu-XXcr: <DOO XooO<<OOCLU.r->j Mo o < o »-i cl clx dook^m i-ozz o»-hCu_cqxlucl»-,< <C O O 00 Cl OO OXUJOOI—O 00O<< OQHUOUUUJCliJ UJCCa.

00^000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

O ><f >f —O—'CMvj-vf^-*-^ vi- tNjcn

^^-^LUUJO — TO>ooxxo —It- ~(—4 T »—

1 •—i<I <C LU \~z—h-a XdCu-XXa: <xooCLX XOOH-iXr-i >ozzOO oxujooi— ooo<<

71

Page 79: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

>»»»»»OUU • O (~C-^ o> wCO « CC OC_C\l ^

CO > QhZ c •• *m >UJ > nr< O —— Qj— > o:oh- <-<\i^ s.

t/> < > ooco>—

"

»-»mo Dco w z > v ——cxx o M 00

00 I i-t > o2Q5"OQ 0<-<CO I— Q > —i .00^2: OlSTLL. *^

co or > torctiooo crrOo OCO UJ O O > (NiOO »oco m2 •" QCO I— Z O > MOv0-~ Q<2! O2: o <t o > < mm—• • -<\i-^ i

2" 5» > LUmZ"'>t;N -^-»rvjcr: O• »-« X o > *-j-<co*~m cl<\i<uj "**

o s: i— cm*-" > cofsj »ujo cmuji— xQ Q O^a. > ^<oa:i-.— a '-1 Oo ^ » 2: o > m »vOQ-a:> _j—a 2:

< LU "-"O > <0m20<t -Q(NI—

.

O3! LU rvJlTX > LU—"2T *UJt— oOi^JCNI COa: lu a: <<i- > »sd« _

1

nz<m *

O t— O O > ^OZCNJ— UJ 0<LU "Si

u_ o lu a—1 > cnjg *m^-Q x •» — oZ Q »-• LU > m «>0 ~- - 0^2:2: O

< 1-1 c:=ttx > •4-21'—o— »^^n o»— 2: o o r— > —mooc-'fM qc: -fvj<: •

<l • 1— co > coi^JZ^ctm a:^<ru. o00 » u.ru- > m< —<o uj^luo >».

2tui •? oao :> < »—as:— - * « COI— olu < »-" > cc>3-oo >< Q—«0—

"

t-i

ducc •— zh-z > 00-12: •—< 1—m —"-3 oQ.LUO Q OmO > (/) .j/JhhoO^-I— 3 wsjQ OZLOUJ < »-ioO»-h > Z -»i-irvgt-Hw_j 0-4"<< H-"-" O cC H-Or- > C <\iO<Ocolu o— lu -

O <Q.< > •-> m » OOD OLU -Z "*«.

LU2TLU LU -J r- > I— CNCSSI— LU -210-2: O0<0 (J OZO > < «——"-" »a:— <<l— U.I O UJZ 2 2? OUJQ- > a: COrvJU_r«s|H-.f\| h- 2T2TI— O <./>

<LU<f < —JUJZ > < tvj«jNj<iQfr, zi—o • CCXH-X «X <SO > _J < -<S.cC - OcoOO O UJUDOZO UJi-i-) > O LL.—" -O—

-

O *02Z sfl >2T <T UJ > LU U(M-.o<\iQ o— »lu m <

Qic-iQii-ia: a:a3a: > q •tvkm »mo •.^ini— \ a:02:000 o o > ^<tm"-" i— hh^^ » o 1—U_ U.<U- LLLUU. > UJ > M^CO »CsJ ~~> O

•> QC • O > _J 2:—"—<C0 H-H->J-fM m 2lu lu luoluxuj > aa 2:cmi—u_o—. 2:<^:m 2: < ujZaizozzz<z > < ococo«-h2c\) oh- d 1— a»-iuj»-»(—hOmh »-h > m Qt-tMC<m Oco~-»—

-

2T < ot— ocrh- 1— oh- 001— > a: 00 •• o inr ox>ooodujo.-o > < 2 -oo2-^ ---» -ivi *v 1 ^.-^^>^,^^-,„^.-, 11

OLUO2TO00OOO > > O——.<0< H-<ffN< O I—QCOacoct: oc: a: > -ic\)fNj_j"-'0 a-—mco o x> 0000000000 —

<

CO CQ(w>CQOc0UJcD > commrvjcoi— O-^ • O O Q- OCS3CT^O<—ic\jo^com>tdodiudzjid > i~i <>-ic) »i • z. omm>r>r>rnim<rvr coCO(— OOCOCO<CO|— CO > O—>— »0 •« oO<U-l«--» O 1-1 UJ —t^r-t-n-H—(-*—"—"—" Z

> ujoOcoujo ujj— 2:cm ^ _j »•»•.»«•»»• o11 11 11 n n > a:i-'X*-'oc:o oco<m 2: i— o^voo^oo-o^o-o »—

> a.a:<OQ-> -2T 2: X m i-> o *u_ oc—.a:— o t— i— —^.—^.~w>_——~- a.> uj2:c\i»-iluo uj>j-i—o z t~i o

a: co < > jo>QJO O— mnI v. aL H luujujuiluu.!UJli!ujluco co 2" 2 o > co »-2: -cox uj2:z<i <o o 2: 1— 1— 1^— 1— 1— 1— 1— 1— i— *— o2: 2: O < >- > D-»rUD » H-OI-CO KQ O •-• _ >-<^k-i>_i ^-,k-.»-.^.>-" <O O CC r— X > Oc\iOf«siO-^ ZLJZO <0 _J CC cCCCcccCCCcccCCCixicC lu\- <-) uj ij> u > omo<o> .-ictro o • < o. 23223333:23 cc

> *** * *«•« #>>>>

U<*J<JH-><*J<-H-HJUJUJUJ<->U<J) O O <^)U(^)^)UJU<J> <uUUJ

72

Page 80: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

in mUJ •• •»

2: .-H —

H

<z II II

UJ r-t —

*

X XL ^h-

•ft •ft.

Qz —•» —«

UJ <> <-4 —

t

UJHH •k X i^_l»- X ft •ft

I-ICJ H- -H —1

LL< 3a: 211/1 -— —»

<UJ •-z:>-(- MO UJ UJ

<z <I-H 2; 2!QH h- < < —t —

<

UJ •>*—

<

z z > >00 >> Ooo H- h- 2: 2:

CC 03 00 zo 00 00 2: 5"

LLI mQ. !D-" 0-<> << t— O —

.

»

Q> Q>< l-»- 002 H m «t 21 2!CC << <I2 O —ft •* ^2! -^2!1— OO UlO

z<N

1—ah- O

— 3— -~ ~3OO OO

Q CCCC -X. O ON ONOO-O OOOUJ UJUJ O (~ t—

1

OOro CNiroo-trn 11 r-vorn M

OO 1-h- o ZLL O om—* OiahsO^ih oin-

*

o ZZ f—

1

«->o a « —1 •• —1 »-H f-I •»—'-HH ••-—

»

_j h- UJUJ o X —

%

-^ —

»

•S/) —• ••00 00 " -OOo CL X \- 0.O -OUJ vOUJ-OOUJ'—'vO-OUJt—t

O II II o CC <\l—» OO -^ oc C\J

II a o>t — ft£ i —» ~- ..^ ftft^ft-'ft—. —•—

»

—t(\l —ft z « -H _J^ * •_« • •_• >.» ft.^

eg ooooo O >* •» -ujuj c UJUJ UJUJ OUJUJo m-of-moo 00 o Q aim • -<o 2Th-Q|~ ZHOh-HQi-'t-l-OM•T >r>r-r^->r z nJ- e-

1

•a 1 c? 11 «»—1«5 UJ »>-i<l-i >—1 <C Oi 1—

< >—i<t exm o ro a: UJ II

— cnujao OLUJCLQCIUJOCXa-UJO-* » •» * » • 1—

<

-H C3 11 • 1—

1

1—

1

"^CC^Zi-1 2a;22fttZ22a:ai•• vO ^OvO'OsO H- •ft »—

1

cnj a. »-iUJ —

t

•4- a. •4- ST vl-OOOU' 1—olu t—— 1

o 1- OILUD 11 COD »-i Z«~» _ Z> OQZ OJZOa:^ Ou_

LUUJUJUJUJ O II *-

1

H

»-ir>-3 >—

1

OmQ 1— (-»-»-)— < o 1— •a* h-O.— 1—< h-tt—• »—1»—it—

4

UJ < UJ O0 7"O zUJ cca.CiLoi.cxi U- UJ LUU- OCU. COCC 333C22 CC Q1-1 0_J»-H UQ

00 00 UOOOO <J>i~><~>U<^><~>

o<NI

o

73

Page 81: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

II II

-^ 1—

1

X. *•» •*

—* —

1-1 P-l

* ^m fr

t

.

t

-^ ^*

UJ in mujS s< —* -<<r2: 211- 11 11

1-

co co1 1 F-l -^_I -» ^ ^ « •^—

,

«-% *» —«.

in .-* in <—{

• CO > » co >.—

i

-* 2: —

»

—»i—

t

^ sII s 2: 11 2: s—

i

3 3 ^ —•—

1

3 3* o O ^ ** Q O•» » »• •i •• •• •• ••

»

s-*— 1/) t—t > ii~« 31—

CO-^ ~^ -^ —

1

—( -H*: SOX S W — *: res s•» 3-1'-' 3 •* 3 *—«.—

1

3fVJ OSS Q Hi ujm 02:2: Qw -33 •» 2: s— -33 •. COLU -hOOO 2! < r-^ -^ <tuj hOOQ S UJs >^ . —

»

2 > > zs >-" r^ -J< srs:—

*

21 »— 2! 2T t~< 2:2: sz S3 3 CO 2! 2T coz S3 3 z>- 301— t-coo rj-t 3~-i 1— 3Qt-l—coO <r</) O i-ZZi—i » — Q> Q>- ~co Q »ZZ —< ••

«— -^—•»—•:SO in 2: 2! -0 — ^^t-tt-i,so O-»>QQDh —

»

-*S — 2: —» ->OODh UJ—

.

-* S»-i>—

n

^>S O— —»— 3

-^ ^3 0— -. -^ S> 11 tiOS >OS 3 (M^H 1— OO OO h- OS 3 rOvJ- OC

o 0-03 II II II Q ONOOvO OO>0 01^-0 OOD II II II O UJao OmO -^ II II ocimo^m 11 r-om 11 O—tmoo O^rOO —

1 II II CO•o -0~i -^-'•-»«—> Oin^vOtnrH vOUIH Oin^-O nO-H -*-»—w> 00

^H -4 •>»— 2: •^^ —* "-i—

t

.—< •.-^1—

(

—i•—

<

.—1 »-H ^^ •.«— S^*-^•» -CO <\I<N|(Mq£S *-» »C0 » •-CO M/) — -co »co mmroa-S

>0 sOUJCO co3<\l<N O UJ >0 nO UJ *-iO O UJ i-h -OUJvO sOUJCO C03(^trn LUQZ —SO ro O O O <f Q QS~- -SO O

•_» - Q Q w^vO >—' —— W- i»i_ *~o »— •»- w O Q —

wt-oj:oio ii • w «— «— • —

—hOIiyio 11 ccUJ UJ ooo -H(\IO UJUJ UJUJ QUJUJ DO UJUJ UJ UJ W^><-> —i<N UJH- »-0_IUJUJUJ_Jr-* h-tr-l- Z.'hQHHOMl- 1— Qhh|— ZI-CJH h-Q -J uj UJ uj _J st 1— t— 00»—•—»»-i<x_ic£occ£:-J<N<t<t uj •—<-<if—1»—«<i o: 1—it—1 <5 en uu «i—<<.>-<

—••-<<: _jot: a: cc—irn<i< uja: in ocuj<t "-!•-< 1-1 <^vi»—i-Oj atuciccujuciciUJOOD a. uj a: mocuj <-(-<»-'< 1^1— 1— 33 »3iiOQOQU<WW(JZH2a;22a:z23o:ilJOZM2a3 »2a:OQOQo<vinz

Oa. OnOi-< o>-«

*

o a

74

t-U-l UJ23 1OZ h-o»-h

1— O21 <a UJ

cc

00vor-0000

Page 82: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

ojoo>nr5-2:xx00• •>

2:1/?r-»^-t

2:2: "-^--*

XX00 DS* •» r~>r*

O -10s 2:2: r-^ <N ^00 >~H~

1

2:2:2:XX >

2:O-4

f-H

in>SI

o~ srxx 2: -H r>—

.

^ ^</) h- DQQ ww 3 f- •• X

1- LU o CNJ O •« •> Q-H O-H * Q~<z _l oo ^ —<Q(\J|— J— 00 > LU K 0<\l * >X o cm «>-i>-Z2^ — 2: O 1 00 — 21

O z < <~< -^ — 2:2:2: tiHj:— 2: z O O r-t «*•* — 21o < 1— * OSDIOQD OD < Ol- 1— » OX

Z O o OODCD>mmDOx0Q h- <i- Z nOC 1 0-00«-» Q x^h a 1 o --•rOQ C 1 mro t/) -»x X-H <T

1 m >tm-*» UL) O ^-0> o -^^ — 11 11 11 in^ 11 >—

1

O w^ 1 s0 0-^ II

o > o • r^ -H •— II r-t *• Q -HO • i—t —1 •oir>>- e£ H-uja 1 • •co a: —«—»«^ •00— H •h-LUC r-t • •CO—COflZ LU HOhh i—1\0 sOU-icot/)— vOLU Q Z • II HOhh v0 vOLUtn^HZ) v; 9t~* LU 1 LU 02.2: H-1^-l»—

1

QH —i ^O • »-l U 1 1 LU Ult-«H KD CO II CtUX '*-'X~ QCh 1»— cc OLUO II CCOD «^X ^*

•coo O •-H3CJ317**—

'

Z —t-O WWW ww O »h- »-«30Z!»-i1 Z WWsOUJ t—

s

t—

i

LU *-"LU *- LU z »—

<

t—

«

LU»-hLUQ II LU w 1— II 1— H-H-O-J—l O2:o0l—0<LU LU lll-XU) ~ h- II II HI-hQI-

»-- X o z —

i

2h<jjOOOOt-.<OX X aODO 2! hZ »-•<</;w-< y~ OIL 0(MQT Oo:lu<<z: zzztocluh-z h- QCOZ>tU- OvfincCDcLUJM

LU 1— .—it—

o^203q:oo««2q:wm »- H-t^HH-t Oi^^2o3cr:cihQZ Q H *~. *** 1-h-i<3 < z < 3 zo:luo LU O O LU Ou_ QC2tfU UL o

o00 <7*

O

OO

aC Uh OQ

O OCNI

Om

i ouu uuoou

75

Page 83: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

<I-

l/>

in

i—i

ii

h

uj

H <> O z

-^ 2: u*» <*>- 2: H 1—2: z> H21 Oh O wO > 1- 1 i—

1

Q —2: «-*

-• 21 OQ z-^+ 03 Oh 1-

OOQ z ZONoon-m -O Ximmhitih 11 O OOhOh •• QHO 0—• »O •</>-» H- •• •«</)

H-vOOJ Z • " —.-OUJ"-" idc?

II— Oujz II —WW •»- w

couj z HlUJm|-DQuj II H-DUJ 1-Qu.iDm<Q3 aonOMOoo:uji-zzooz -OcrCUJZh- 2oiuot-' H- t-< •—i2ac>—

1

I-Z-- 1- h-r* =3 Z ZDOu. OOUUH OQ O

O O O< LO -O

—4H t/)

in o Z

O ~11 ui -t

_ ~ 5:

«- zQ <1—

t

•»

—» ac—* *^

o»-i —•.-*

h z— ~^ ••</) LAQ

Oh mm ^Zr- »»a: <—i—» —in 11 ••

11 Q ~olu h •• —tin\-~T ^— ^

<X —*-' iHoz00 oh- -ts; 11

z «/> ^o —O -^ »»UJ —

1

i-h —« mo: hi*:1- m — *-> *c »

h- • 2" -to an-* <« i^

LU Z»-« — »•

< Z • I' <N1—2 — </)Q UJ—

< O t-« —O 2ZIJJ

O Z O *UJ <2!1 ii »m hoc z<

h- OCfsJ 1-1 (—

Z

3 UJ Oh ~.Q i/)h-0. X —» • •> •» t/>

z K- a. nOo o~» —~~~*-* OtNJ 00 h-»-»

I— O —I • HCJ< z 0000000 -oluO h— 00000000\— *— U) o-Hf\iro>j'invO>-tuj|—H s0<t oooo^OHCNjm^<t a: _j 0000000 ••-< uj »— qoohhhhhC-1 Q. •—

(

^-(^^^.^^^^h—< II (XCJ3'—V) ^HrH-H-HH.—I^-H^HI ^ >«•>•••>•> « m2(JZ " fc»»»«««i»»i

h- 21 I— sOvO^O^O-O^O^Oi—1 chU —» sOO -0 >0 nO >0 *0 >03 X UJ ^- I— I— «-iLUCL \— O ^-w^.^-^-^^,0 2T»-«-^3~~«-'—-«-"-^^—

z •-• COLL Oo:--tzt-* a: t— uiujuiujuiujujr-ii-i U2Hi-hujujujujiijujujujh

O Z I— t— I— »— t— I—I— hh-hHHhhHh-**O O t-H |_»-1»-H 1-4 -••-«»_! Z »—••—• •-•MMMMM<z j it a:oe:cL.a:a:ar'QiO ooiQ:<xa:a:a'Q<ciiCUJ < Q. 33333330 U22323232H

«• *

O Of^ 00

000000000

»—1-^

OI

o01-mzH3HO

II

— ex.

I-ZhOU.Oso

76

Page 84: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

ooo —< t~

Z-^ 3CM O* o

o oz z<r <r

in c\i in

id

Q 3 -^II O II O —

z o m

»

CM o O 2:•» in id •» Z II

< CM3Q

*-*

it

~~ *• m —

I

„^ O 2-H -h Q —

i

in 1- H^ *: O ^ » •» UJ a: a: 2^-.* •» 1- a -h H- o OO 3H oo -« II -»

-4<2:

v0 OvO— m002:Mi-

1

**n̂

"* "-

'

id -H i—

i

XUJoo

Z< HH <

02:2:HODOUJ •-« CM UJ —» •* a a: •• cc 2:00or —

.

id X -H <f a: uu o —O 1 3H< UJ < id a. > s: n0 n—z 2: <—

»

oz •» -^— a. < 3 O omi- y- »oq: < ho: m < cc z m ZZ3 31— h-H-00—*-\- z

00cm»- —.UJ

uj<s:i \-

oCM <r<i5:

O »-H

5T3^r»'—

1

h^mmJImo— H H-

1

o— s>-< oo z s o H-+ "VI NhOODo •>• Q »- <zz 3 LU 3 1- Z h-< <NhmQ»,—

»

—» Z3»- -5 Q. ^y ^^ DttJ <»* 0. — —

»

o H-Ooo < a o t o a:—«-» Om • || II II II II 1—o h- ao OOO »- < o o UJ OIL — O0

OvO Z o O •o w— <t i u_ s0 H-CMCM — r>j|— »— ^ «^-«»MH»H 3 >a- in —+~* < Q UJ o ro «« »—

-»«tf33 00 O• iH c i-H—• <-H -H -,Q-» -^

1 H s: «.«-««-^ 2121 t-l^*-"-«»-HUJ •> o rHCNJ^ H • h- h- 3 z 3 H ^ —( II II —1»—

1

111 O IIzoc •>1-4 »^:•• sOO oooo o 3 a. o z H OQ(M MM3*- CCw—

• c\ 1 fH s0->>o • c\ 1 vfr »f0 o a. s: t—

1

• II i-«»-tM •-•»-<<z z—c\

1 + < UJ— C\ 1Ho-

1

o z a h- w. UJ II IXCX<1 3 i-tcx Q5iu)<Q. II —a— z .-«<—

1

-H •—

i

u < z HOU 21— 1— iNJ-JMrvirvil—I-UJC I

*-> I— •UJG H- • •»I

_J a: •^ -3UJZ II Om Z<-J<<r<ooZl- H »—

t

UJOOUJ l-l- vOZ^O >0 k- sz 3 00CM oc : q inMU. oo<u_u.u-t-H3>-i UJ II 1— •>»— UJI— »-• Ui 3 UJ z X O s: 1—U!LL1< II II arcM<t»-' U^~-)LJ<J»J>LJClaa:coo "-!««.•~oclc£03~o>-3— »—

<

1- _J Q II Q.I—3 •-"

O20Z0(\|Q:Ma:2:osoz o z a: l—l < O QmZOQOLL»-«fM^3ii3»-' i I—(UJ—'UIhh UJ 0. a: o r^ m^OOnOM h- H »-l-ooi-h- 1- o -Jcc H-roxXQZ 2 ZhOmZ—

<

Q o UJ _JUJ ZUL DO OLL OoiZflCOa: z —I X <HU_ OOt—

t

UD#

<Jl#-H U3<202 UJ < K Of-ii-i OQ

O c 1 o o oo* a 1 h CM ro nT1—

»

f\1 CM CM CM rM

000000000

77

Page 85: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

IOC/)

CM

3O

Q

3

< -,—

ZOOmh<x>

oo

Ooorvl

<-^

OCOO^>2"3OQo •—*«-»xrHCS<\|2I>=>2:0

co 1 1 2:ft X>- OO>>»-•—>-> *5:Q2:2:_J—I2Z2I.-0O 2: 2: UJ LU 2! 21 >-

O

OQ 002TOQ + + 3MO II II II II Q<X x>—«—•CQ—»—*—• "«*

— 2:2:HI •-•33fH »-H <* CO

O COCO ZS> «-»—<Qx 11 11 »— ocox>- OQUU<<X>-»-<>-i

-jK-h-QOtXCC_l_l_l -J -J 2: 21 CDO _J _J<UJUJ03UJ2:<<ODOWIOUOOU

2:2:

oo

1-H-cOST"—

t

1 11 i?7

0031 11 iQ

II II II

ms:

3, II Q

O2icocx: 11

tsjiNjisii-H

<t<<LLQCQCDCDMOooo<x

II Uj

02Oi—

1

oo

COz:o

00c-a.

zcI-<CO

UJ00a:UJ

<a:

u.OoUJ

<oUJ

D-

OCO

UJo

0LQ.

O

O(M

OC0O-»(NO

OO—CO

OO «n0 ^O

00 h-K00 COCOl-l- *-f*

00V.«*s * *

-*r^—.—

.

x>— 00

oca.—.<-. COr\jc\l 00

00-II—

I

ccoc00ujz

I I

mm

ool-H»-l

CCQC00UJ2T

I I

x>002:2:00COCO

I I

x><<_i_iLUU-OO

—t UJUJC —

000:UJ<ZS

O.U.o»-

UJ II II00wX>HODZtxacaoo000

+ +

oo—

OOOX>- •-'•-•

—.— ZT II II ~~"

CNlfNlO—»—>QQ«~«~ -HHHQia:

—1 00QQ *-—-UJ2 ^-I^H-H•-!•—• II ^-HJ) •• •» •OCdL 00 -o-o-ooOOi-i»-«»-i II II UJ C7>

uj2! a:a: 3.—_«— <m000002:

11 11 r-ui;zoo>-|ujujujoog00x> \- \- h- 1-»~QO Zi-<»-it-i UJ00a oacctacaz)

x>o us^^mzz

0000<Nm

OOr-o

OOOm>*-m000

UJ

lUJUJf- 1— I—

f

CHX-CCo

UJUJU1I—I—I—I—'»—IH-1

a: a: a:

oCM

O Or- CD 0>CM C\J CNJ

00000

78

Page 86: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

t-t 3«srw •« OGQe —

.

OO»—

<

»—

t

»—' *-

cc w a—O O fO

—» Z-* HH QCHr\j o'-' ££ oz

»»W o Z=)n —

.

—OO 2 00*—i •—

i

ITiM o •0cc W ••< •—

«

~«—

1

o CO <—*CG «»> 1 ms: "**~*

LU rvj II t_> in- •»M•i < *h •• •ho -H< •«^^%

.

LL *.— -^m II CD CMfM—

»

fM o •>»-i n < —to —

*»*«*

•a* •> .—»«» rHCQ ^ in OOfNJQ —

.

-»z *U •w^ h —

»

H-lt-t-W-

i—

t—t ^M •» •» —0 —

.

oo-h —

.

CCCC*CC •— ••< ^•^ Hh ^ 11 to OO—O 21 maj -*!-« iiZ 00 z^ pH 00 Luzmz f*l «~o >^w 3 —

t

O^i z —

4

-^h < OLU •> z OO O 2: •• ^0 z 1 ! O—

,

LL. OZ" mN h-O in •»—

3 LUin o m<j»—

i

—•< z— m z^ < » O -.—0;m •» z— LUCQ OO to s^ (-Z—-» »»-^»»» mmo.

f-t -^ Ot~Q ZO OM z Ul •• ^-1^.-. z-*— ~w3II I—

h-OOM o< •• 0<r ~»- -^ K-<1- 32" iH OO +-4 w —

<

M?" —'CO z «-^» OOOZ zoz t—«•—i(MX. o O »co enact-* LUO koo: OU.: OO-H—

1

tDr^^^ a'CL-it-•a NOOlOO I 3! - zoo zz -ZZ OZZ oo#—

»

<-H *: • 0~0 <>* O sO to LU<t —033 33 LU^-.^H u.m— «* \- »-M Z^ O-»r0 h-Z HOD OOO fM*: o —*: in<t Qi •• z f-4 »H h-Z -H •——.—.a »OQ •• OiicD 01— in O 0C< z-^— in 00 <3*^^,-. ST—w- O

f\j mi— h-om O O Vj-wv^ 00—0 ^—4-00 3 1 tuw 5£ zm^ —*. •» m » * ro vO 8 OQZ •« ••rn—l *</)t/5</)MOWWl/) OfLU •OOO * — -4- m-» om •.^-IrHv^mMLLI-lCDcO-^fvJ ».CDCD-^X>"Q.Z •tUOH- O^ 0^:0 OZZM V)SSyy<QNi«5:<N«2:C02< *: O ••i—i QS •» »- h- H-<« 00 <003UL<00Z>zz2! vO— l—om —.z _J jQO-«-« I V.LL. O •-•Qi 03~5wHO —

»

• Q z-t:*: O 0+ »M tvj In IXi.l ao— 0)00001— rHLU— t-t z> - •> 000 l-< <—-OOOOmD *- (_—Z o Z CC On0-« r*-o OCJ rMf0<r«sj h- J— II »-h- 11 II a:3 f\l • • LUOLU 1-1 —0— —<-l • II •HhM<N-l<**ZZ0O —ZZ00

-.—o ego h-UO —.— -iQ LU ZZHHIvJU. 1-11-iCQ* H-lt-lCC1^.-^00o —'LU»-ii—<o2! • Q 1—1 •«•—*-* HN(/)W -^O0 t-H •—« •• *<tt—il/)QO< 00OO<:

oo i—i •• • Q£ »*M arujK-t •QcCO <<< 2:00-0-0 QIhhQ ^Zi-i^-iOrNjrn>Oi—1<—

vQ —2-.H- LU»— or • o»— •1 —1 U J + 0»-i •—

1

II O O 11

OCM + H- ZLU «t-«OlJJ UJ—L'JZ O II ninD CC «^«_< 11 cc 11 11 11 "-0.^ M II IIWW

—»-H II ~-o_LL. QD a:LU3 z 00 LU <<Z>-*-o II II •-• O O 00•• n <-~ii—i o •-• 02M202 lu t-a •tO t-H UJLUMtvl OZ00O OZOOOO'-'o*o*~> LU •—1 »—

1

1—^0 <«- 1- II II JOShh«JHHH LU -J <\i r\l rg lu LUOII II 1 1—— |— LU|— h-lO'—uji-_j 2: -JZZ t-n-H LL CC -J NJM i^g cL -J in!M tvl CC DC Li.

w.^-0 »—

«

z zdq.q:p-wdq.nu, OvtLn<LULuoc:a:'-io<««:i.Q-<«K<iQ.a.»-im^mccm OIL 0Z02ZNZ0<h O^^Uhh22000LULULU3:(_>LLJLULU230

LULum^^:3i-H 0»-i O »—

1

t—

«

»-»- 1

H--"•—•—

t

z Zcccco Ou. Ou_22Q Oh-« Ohh

#*00 00O-H c\im >t mmm mm m m

79

Page 87: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

*-^» * z (NJ

^LU 1—

i

-</) 2" •k

• 1—

1

O X13 a: »-*

>-*: LL •»

DO w m—2:0 •• 1—

1

i-«_) X •»

^MO -t X^<- •i r-4

—* •* * •»ox O <N. - l-«^- ZL —> 1

OOtto. •" " kz-w-o- •» >V-CMf. X »A•-««• t- m - 1

t/>(/) h-tt •» •

-HC\J hh-m. 12 w <Si-MM M 00-8- l—O c •

<< < 0#=3a: z (MLULU O: «-»'^ q--m-2:ll • ti—

«

» •» O -^ *»H 2: »2:3: O 00 z#^ X X-«\| l-t~<N 0* <o in • f\l

PNlM 1 zz# •-<«•- z m O-. « t/>0=>* H--K- w-h 1 - in

UJUJ —

»

hOO> «!«• X»- • •> •

i/)0 •> •• to MOOO 1— « vOOO t/^ XMhNCQwm 1—

1

< 2: i/i-H- »<t 2T <4-^hQrOi—t(\)i—iD LU— 13 •*- LU O HU.LL. NNQlLa «^ » V) _j •«•(/) »—i •*MO«o»-ia: < 2:00 <#LUG 1- - XQh LULUH-OLU f-O 1—tt—ll—1 + H-^H-i-h <r t/!f\l •zz rNia:o: z-«-<o: H- CC - <tzx <Ol5N LU o#zo 00 LUin H-O luluZ* 1— rvltt m h- . <t/> OOOOO II -OOtt <t HH#0 u_ IU>j-(—1 *•» >$• in vO r— 00 •* 00 xoo SI a:* 0:0 O 2:—

1

cnjcnxnicnicni 1 Um 00 pH 1 10»-i 1—

1

o#cz - LL O—> —1 —* —1 —1

—* l/> 00 -4- M 3TO X I*Om LLI •• » LUUl II *-• • # <—>*-.DLL O #UI 2: XX >

t nC-0 vO <o<o -J 00 LU (/)»-i oc ZT* H- < coro a:>-LU •-H—»LU 1- rom O Q. 2*Qa: Z •> •» LUZ O II —»-^ w Q. 0#mO • • vf «/>

1- • < ooz a ^,—- -^ < Z#a:Z i 00< CD2: LULULULULL' OZmx> OOO I— 1 ^*e X CCif\

MHK h-t-l-l- O m<i—00 -HCJQQCCO t- m LU •• -Q^l H It—«—!»—

I

UJ Z2T2TLU —1roco*—11—iOro </> •» •>2~i—

1

•» H-X1-100:0:0:0:0: > O ODDD -n^o:o:i/)m —

.

r> XXI- Ol LUrH X<32332 cc O OOOt/>Z -< » »OOQH ~3 rornDO 2: * -»II LU •—

t

O^OLUZ —<\|{\|- - z; - <n m** </> H • II sO < •* » •» • t-1

OC CO ZLU Q"— II II 1- >^ XX «• X •»-»">.

QCU. OD LU t/)w 1—1 LU -H^s r-ICO X <MX "XLU*-" UZ »ljjcuxvi— a. »- - *s mc\J •—«-^rn-H^"x

*-1h-t-QQQllI O 3 •»

LU »— LUK-i^•-tSTSZLLI—LU a. »l»>»l—i—«^»l w*s.<-»- 2: Z)0. a: 0:dO »-i •-• —

»

2: 1

O ozos2cotoca:z O H t— »—•—»— H- •+-Hcoi-LU UM 3»-iUJ <<<<< <- <<tUL<CC 1 1- H- a. 2:2:2:3-2:-»5-is5: -2:CC z z »—

1

O a:a:a:o'o: 0:1—o:a:xa:C, OLL 00: z h- oocoavc^ccHaO OH* 03 LU CO LLLLLLLLLL •"U.OU.U. "U-

•M- *OOOOO OO OO OOO O-H<Mr0vf in or*- co>0 r-aocr> OOOOO O 00 Om rornrn >r ,-t^t^-HrH ^H .—it-^ 1—

1

OOOOO 00000 o

80

Page 88: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

•> —

c

»

>

.

» •_ CO * M- - J— HH h-<

m -> 1—1 > m V * » U> Y- 00

LU 00 1_ M- "^ to # •K- 0O2! t-i

o __!»—

1

* "N. » • —•

»

._: # # QCt—1 00 0_

z Ooo * •k 2: 2: * «-• # LU O< mC * m m t—t * * >O0 Q. "Z.

H- ha # * • • • H •« m » <yz. c00 1—4 # •Jt

•» «_. OO— 1—1 * * 0:0 z 1—

i—

i

oOZ •ft « r-g (Nl 0- OO * • * i— •—

•1— <-•

o oc H- * 1—1 1—

«

U4- C »• 00 •* 1- k-i <m _. Q.l-i # * v» » h- o_ * * U-O- h- h-«• h- # * _» • LL.! • •« * * OO < 00

X • __:< •H- # 2:tO 2 * V* •» h- v^

CX* • 01- * •{«• • t OC •» in «• _?o 00 Lll •*

•i 2: 1-HtO # « O • LU »—

1

* • » o_s 00 -* 1 h- «• # -H 1- * CO «• r-.f- LU 0- r^

t •n <UJ tt J* m M min < * LL * \- to LU Co X H-00 •«•

-H-•" •-> •2: \- * p> M- <lu a: > t—t

h- r»- 00 O- * »«• — m m ^ 00 M- • —^ H- _J0- LU < Hoo p> LU # « —

1

t—

1

-_!-• # M- _D<—

>

0- a• LU> * » v «_> •> LL - LU * • > * u < h-

•» to _ oo< * •«• • a -in to * 2: * _JLU. OC

X CC CCCC •* *—in - t 0- * • •« <U_*h- o_CO LU m LUI- # * • 11 11 o--»UJ # - 00 * tjLU- LU O

—• _- h- • > * tt^co •II -H > •« —. •.<__ •« x -z: OO c

* UJ 00 <o ft * -a. •* OO u_rsi< » (NILU •«• oi-xlu O —>so; 2: LL OiLU ft * m - X zz •if-10- >« - •-»- M- »— ma -J-__i m •» 1—00 ft M- «X CO - I-Hl— * •UJ •« •>tc O - c^- CD •» X ft •M-rvj—

i

•> (—1 » -K- 0-- 2: # -TOO * r-n—» Z X 1—* «?_J ft *—1

- m 1— II •. •M- O # <f2Z» LL LL LL<r -H •» LUO ft >U-(N OC •< m ••LU •M- 0- .- * t_:0 i O __"

V.O- -H in o_ ft & -—

1

O K- _M-too «• 0_0 - * <J) 1—1 •• OfN«S.HH _> • OIL ft # X - 0- 00 X O W- uj in M- oh •__: "Z l-H

-o_X i co O ft # rsix QL Lum __l # - • M- o_hh2:0 O t-o-. Oco • LL LL •ft » —

(

UJ 0- 0—1 11 * U- -0 # Q.t/>^»-H >—

«

CLO# 00 •» OO ft *m - I'J __: » •« u_m^ * OoCh- H- O* - I X LU ft # •<*) X Ol <- «p LL. » Oi-hLL. •«• <a.o<r < --•

#-00 •i —4 21- ft « «i»_-i 1— h-0- -O M- •» *• M- O-J _l Q_•«• -2 X »_» o<t ft M- r-t - o OC 00CX •* 0- - # ooZctJO -D =)ct:

#xo 0> CM *——i ft M-U-X 2: O l-H Q_ 001— M- zz * i-hOCO O OLU•H-CT^ t-4in i-o ft * --H l-H Q_ Qfii-iZ »•--.=5 11 11

* —» l-H- _l -J >h-#—tl— •» •> • <xo ft M- X -— hsj Q_ LU -LU * •5J- ooi— -<r < ^* -< • XC0 _j_1 ft * r^CNJ < UJ O <. 2: •S-^Q. »• • »-«<xo O 00UJM-- «- • -^u. Z>< ft •»• —-f"V t-i_U>l—.# V LU # #IK l-H

#QW OO •» •» OO ft #<t _l X o_oooo * -i^XO * - 1—00 -—< CN LU#LU -mx _JLLI Si- «<- 4-< 1- OZ_'<tio- *- of-z: •« •MB « «J VJ H-OO-H->U- »—l-H <o- ft *mA<l- r. < ex: ~J »» ujo< »• X - -# - •» <<#c_:o •s --OQ- Si- * - 1 1no 2 JI-DDO#4 X2:i— * r-xx- x X XLU• LU 2: -xm • m ft *x -t- t—

<000<X* * Of-it^ •M- in (7^ ->t * 2_l-O0UJ •^•H • >* -. — ft *-h- :X- tvj l-MU* I—- •»• - M*-* — «• - •> -x - •» - a.XCOS •<r ->* -XX * •* - -.—4 - < DQ< -UJ —« -<D -M- - • - 0- m t->w

-^o< Qin>j---t>4T»-m ft •»• (NJ X -. H-- <- XSX# X-

-

CM -ft •» «• »-••)« *-.X -m- z -<U-<-H--l • • -^t-^tMfNj *> •» •"•^ 0-* og » -

1 «—«» % » 00X•»• --» -xm -m - - •> _••> •*!-1 --^X-> XX -LU * -XX— <"• t •> — *> _s - ••• <Nox - x*r -x •*w X X -X ->. tN - r\|CM>vK- « ^ogrg o>rx XXX -X-• X* -(M<^XV.vO -xrsixv.'v m NXNXN- V. •» --HrsirsKO OOO- O-M-O- "V.

OJvO K\|S>tir>}-SS t—

--tojin.-<*s» "v s\S #v^v.,_ »—)U_m_-<—,-H-H--l-^ —l» >-H ••

m • • fH * p__ - X-.•._»-

•—••*_—-^—

«

_—-._* ^»» «-<—.._»-«-n> -**-Xw* -_-«--__ «ii»«ii'»«« I'm w*-^ ^wX-TO'o O # •» - X >t -

»-l-H»-t-l- H-(-HI-h- h- 1— 1— 1—1hh« . K« h-hhl-a:i-#l-|-l-t-l-l-HK#r-l-*iAh- -»—

-

h-l-«<o0<<<«<<--<--<«<< -< -<<«__.<#•<«<<«<•&• <<- -<- <oo«2:5:2:- 5T S: 5" 5-2:^: 5"

2: 2:2:2-:^_rm2:in5:5r2:2:o.5:-».5:2:2-2-2-2:2:2:-«-2-2: — 2: •Jizs:?-cco-a- -ct: __:__: _£<____:__.- al^aiacccalLt: • o_ »o_ a. ococ <(__}< _»___:c_:Q_o-tx:_-:-i--ii- o-Q_xo'jc-:oo__;oc_:oicooxocoocoowoscocoocoocooooo o* oooooaco* co^-hOzghOOLL U- LL in U_ U_ U- U_ U- U- U. 2;LL^U-LLLLU-U_LLU_U-LJ-U_U_U.>-LL-M- U-U_U.U_U_LL.U_U.* IL.U- -I_UOU_|— LLU-

# * # * * « * » •W- -M- * -Jt000 OOOOOOO 00000 O 0000 OOOOOOOO OO O OOc*o-^ (Mro>j-if\>or-co a> O—ffMrOvT in vO^-COO ^H(Mfn^msOi*-co c*o —

t

(M rOstO-H-h -H._i _t —t __i -_i _4 —

»

<\ir\|(\|rvjc\j (N <\|(\|C\|(M CO rnrommrornrorn rn^- >t >*• <f^t

81

Page 89: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

— o O X • 00 z. * x >—) h t-H-^ »- h- c - *> •• H-l •—

1

X cc < • • CM -* h- 1—

<

OO h- —1 1—1 —. - mt —.00 CO —i LU • 1—1 •> (—1 00 •XLCC t~> 00-.K =»t —* '•

o - i£ UJ X (—1 h Ch 00 • ^ 00 c UUI 00 < m a^cc o-o QC 3 X UJ UJOO cc *«v ^ O 0. <th- O 0.. k 2 - O< •< O 2 3: > UJ •* » a. coz: 0. too c O h"O - CD u_ h CtUJ h- m • z UJ zr- 1-1 r- cCD • < h v0 UJ-J UJ O 0" z. c 3:» 2 O *UJ h- z - 1-

-* > -ih- h < 00 Q. 3T • 3 M 2 _<MX-.»-« ozUJ hhOO 00 T5» <N CO 3" 00 0^ h- a:x O l-Mh 00 »-o>i-

v. s«£— a: < d z: in o< >!• fx uj z < u->r Z < •> • hn< •

•> - •—< _i l-H c co X UJ _l *c h- CNJ ^ I—- zoa 1-1 1— in <—_J>v u_ h >—" • IUUJ >t 1- 00 Ul • 00 UJO O0»-i •»

• < =» hi t—

1

h in X vt- U"-*2T 1- OO^v h- =ttUiO^ noox m< 2!- UJ X 00 t—

1

in (-a- O 3: < 0-/ Ul M\ O0 UJ SCMC Q-CCM 2:

h mZZI h O O0 in O • • ct: 00 3 cc oorri— ir»t-4 O.-^ CO< SCOh- a. O •» LLU- 0> ZOUJ t—

t

LC *Z» i-< o:aLi ! o»— OO •> CCO-O oe:>—•»—

ct: o_ C\J O- r- »-«o> U- UJ O • LL UJhhCO •<! hhOO-v U-O'-•uji— \—cc h p- m <N 00c > Ooo -»>h- 0>(— IM •• m

CC h-d-HG u_ O0 h Z.X #• z-tuj UJ <x _l UJ <t»—iLU(^O0 l-X- XCJsU,"^ OOOU- CC 00 •> OCNJ co o^oo X a: u-» x- aroooco h-3: h-<Nk- -s: o O »—

1

< >T -1^^ mO£D h- h- 1—

1

h- ihOZ LU h- 30"z> oc*:q-o LU U_ _J h- O h- #o UJ • fH O-<0uO0 <f-o: 3!-tUJ too uu 00 CD <^* <o h- h- -J-H z z 1— ujq: <u_ •—t •

LL?U_Oz;u) 3 UJ UJ Z »—1 •• O t-H D < < 0^ LU=I*UJ—00 h- UJ O rvjo^

O-J >20 X X »-• >- z >a:a z UJ iuo^z> zoi <mh>-tUJ o l/J h h X Luo •-H UJUJ> UJ UJ < • JZ3hOuj< >-iz:h- —

1

LL>QC^«/) < h- O K- Oh _l _l 3: hOhh - CC x»-«z>CO hO^< 3 00 00 an OO 00 ^0 O u«»-HUJ<rO *t~ i-h-3: >-ic^:

2Z<rhU_ 3 •—

«

>-H O CO <r QLUM 25 z ujrg CO»- COK'-'X CCWt-i q:uiOhO U.

~* Z CCZ. UJ a: < <I >ro HH OOOC: vOU- o<i^j Oh»-«<<f\io2r C z z -<a <.. CC UJ00UJ 0<N|0 2!UJ< Zhot: o »—

a-»c O 00 00 O UJ • UDULU * 3:ujO- UJOCUJt-H h 1—

1

•—1«^»—1<. 2UJ-.>—

1

zoozr UJ UJ 000 2ra.zo-)uj>vuj OOO hOX—OSCh 1—

1

h- h GCO<00 a: <ct:0 > > co < <cdX"^s: Ml It 1 rj»CDS <T>—

<

00 —1 '»»—I"• OQh - o--»»— UJl-H a: CC oo> h- 2!h-UJh- *< cCcCcCO »-i--<ZcO 00000 • <OOOZ 00 1— 1— UJ UJ vO O00o0> - Z 000 •• t

3< O a. OIUOQ" ^D t—lO •• m L'Ji—

1

00 00 • • -H »—<»—it—i«i •• • 00hh >C£U<Q- OQ-UJ (Dm ou>3:</) CD co Ol—OaC ^UJ 3" 3: 31 UJ<COUJX Z cc >uj(njx2:oujox 0--O a UJOO < i-uJa:x h-hh- -JfO

UJQ hhZ 2 zujz cc _imi— _i 1— —» q. —1»-< Ot—O -JUIh- DDD a. •

a: <z 3 O 31/13UJO-CO »-h 1>0_ ^ »H » U! UJ o_» »-«00'-«OCLl— s:o><a:i—ujooO z ocdooos: •00H-m 3! 000 >r\jX X 3: CC CCZ^ILHS) i/ioooo <CNIUJ< hZ * 2T02T CO< in»-t< <>$•»-. •Zl'OI— h- <x oujo<<!3:»-' MMM X

UJt-OUJ ^ ^ ^OXlTl J—C£X4- <r X>1- 00 - X UJ •

CCZ O0h 00 00 ujini— o-oujujoi— 11 3:oac cc ujrg occtra: »uj<nji— h-h-H— 3:ujuja:<<oo 1—

1

oo<roooo <M< 1— .< (--UJ UJ •» ujujujx tn< <<< u.x ujujXt-< X >-i2»-<<ct:ry-Xoo2:cr:o>x «3 h- h- a:^ h>l— CnJO^OX XXX Off1

hHHJ2I 1- X xsoos^ujof^soo^z: y » 2T<Z:'-^0 »3 323 U_r-I

- - za. h hUJh U_-t- X U-(\|- h-XOUJ UJ LL- uiQ.u.1 •hj_o»- • KM m» HJJ- •>• •» - _l- ul> •»^— •< 1 - co »oo» • • •-«- h • (— - >»» o> » •.*•*> «* •

XX -X •* X •O •»_! ••OCX OX -CC - •» X-«•..». »fOX XXX xovO>t(NXvOX (M X2:xoxujc\jh- >X-OfM XLJX X- xo X -X- X- CNJ (MCnJvO r\l

^-l>-*- -H-^CNJ —

*

<NI< <\Jz rgh >H< 00 cni •^UJCMJ— (Nl •O*-1 - CNJXfN #CM •"-* —i* ir-i -HO>•• »^\| »~^ •* 1—

t

|-I<HZ *• O-^fX ••—J^ZT^H -H» -HOOO^-^fNJ^H- HX » •»«••» »rn•i » »UJO *t—1 * * »>0*s» ^.^S^v •n,-^

*V nJ"^^\ "V ^<rv.2t«v,» \XC\hS2\ V ^c\jv.o£0>. ••v.f\(>s.(\l>s >^V.V. v»*H m < * ojO 2 < UJ »-i o-^ ^ •-• - - 00

« 1 »«—««^—l*»H«» «— «^ < X"— -^UJ— uj«-X •«»O0w ^* —^U. . 1—^ »>^- tM»"<v«-> ^.- .^. «— i 1

X •• O *W « UJ < —t » — •• «

hhhhhh 1 » t— C\|hXh CMf—^ 1- •+- J—UJh--1— H-O-U-Oh 1 \- i|-hh h- «<<<<<<!-»< •<^<tCNJ< ••< «-o^<x<ct:<_j< <%<H-CNi<zrOfc<oo<t- , <«-»<X3! 3! 3! 21 3T3-

3> 3: SnXsr. i• 3103:03:0-3:- 3: 3: m3:<3: s:m3: -3-3T3- 3:-oc^c^ococacci: •ac *cC*+*cC -a: -lL ujm cc <\i cc u_ a:

«

. CC • aizrc^h- *cC cCZcC cC^lLCcCcC-taloj OOOOOOOhCl-O -OV.O- O-J O "O- O -02:oooi<?ozcoowomodo<o - 2:LLLLU_U-LJLU_XU_XU_- u_ -a. •u-o 11 U.V.U. u-xu.ou.MU.O'OiioiLMU.za. HJ_U_U-LnU-'^ LU

# # * * »• »•* * * * * * «•» * * # * *OOOOOO O O O OOOO 000m or^°ooo ^h c\l m vT in -0 r» 00 0> ^^ c\j rn ^ in >or-co CJN

-t-4-^-t^^ m m 10 in in m in m in -0 -0 >o sO^O-O

00

82

Page 90: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

cocoouaaaaaaQ»>»»»>»»uo oO O a. > (—1 in

O O 0. > 00 2O O 2 0. > •> OO O O 0. > in 2O O O 0l > 2O O LU 0l > Z5 «v

O O OO O. > 2O O O- > *- «-»

O O O Q. > r» —

.

O O 2 0. > 2 >* <-*

O O < D- > 3 OO O O. > 2 i—i

O O CV > a* 00O O LU a. > • +O O t- a. > O '-m

O O 3 0. > i-H 2O O 2 a. > 2 O r-O O t—

<

Q- a > O u 2O O 2; D- 2 > 2 LU 3O O O- > •» —

1

OO 2O O « CL > 1—

1

X #O O Q. LU > L_> in O —

.

O O LU a. 00 > LU 2 2»w O O LU 0. > OO O < rH

O O a: a. ujO > •» 2 "Z-^ u O a. H-2 > .—l •« LU •—

t

o O LU^O Q. DO > ^ •^ 1— O 2LU O 000 Cl 7*0 <t > »—

1

O O OOO O CO O. 1-1 a; h- > 2 O 2 in 1

Ok O 000 a 2:00 < > •» O t-H •

-^ O 200 a. O > ^ t 2 O O CM2 O -too Q. • • > O O •B.-»0-»>t—

1

2 O »-O0 Q. h"* > LU O •» -«««*.—»«^»S

2 \- O Dr a. LULULULU03 > O O — 2 2•» ac O a. 2: 0. LUh-LUK2Q. > 00 •» O LU -tO<N3

-H O 2: • Q. OO 0:30:302 > 2 r\J O LU -^>2>0o OC" O OQ O. 2 OZOZUm > O >• O d >2 2LU h- O UQ O- O LU>-"UJ»-tUJ > t—

2 O 2:2*2—Q 2 O a f^ a. *-t 0.2:02: OO LU > H~ 2 i-t LU 20 o«-•« <r0 O of Dl \- X > < ID V O OO—O—^ Ico O or LU a. h-« ZZZ7ZI- > CC O r- O> 00s O u_c: OO Ol 2 > < •• 2 O wr^wh21 SiH O O O. r—t LL, > _l r-^ z> h- ~ O 22 3 O LULL a Q. LL <<<<<o > > 2 H-LUh-»-H3 < •• O 2 2 Q. LU H—•—•—•—•— > LU 2 •h < 002020Q <_> m O hhLU < a. O <<<<<2 > O 2 V H CQ»—1 —it—

t

2CNJ O H-X a. OOOOOO > 3> < <o 1 O— <_> < O 3»- 1—

Q. LU HOO > LU O O Qm t—•*-

Soc O O 2 Ql -J 1— h- »— 1—h-OOOO > _J —4

00 <LU O a:u- >—* a. CD 33333 <DO > 00 22 • 1- ^w>w|-ST OOCQ O CDO 2: CL < Q.Q.Q.Q-CLLUOOO > < O O 2 <QK-

O•h-

OO

300<t-H *

a.a.

t—

4

Oi22222XOOO >

>t-i 1—

t

00 <-4a.2

-"H-2HO><3<_l

l-O O h-> a. <l > <J. »—

>^ (—

2-OOUU.LU JO O <<X2:-h a. > II II II II II II II II II > > <_> O 2--J _JO2 O SO 0. > LU O LU DU-^u.h-i • • #• O OO 3LU 0. ^tM O > CC —i X OO Q^-1- O h|-DQ a. >> O > 0. 2 »- II

3 C£LU O 3 Q. 22-*-^-^ inf-—

1

> O — II II II

o»- O OOQ. •« •• a. 220200222 > LU 2 LU CM 2cc x< O mZ Q. ddujmuji-i:DDD > _l O II >- cr:

CO l-O O Xh 1- Q. 0002:00002: > CO < 2 l-4^r-4-4 O3 3 O 1- H-3 a. > h- < 0022:0 HOto < u ZDQ. 0. > < X *-<LLOf 'LU LU2

OQ.H Q. > O O 0000200 QiLUH- 0C2:z> Ql >O U-t-iC a. >LU Q. >"3 O- >LU Q. >

u. •»

ov» uuuoouuuuuuooouououoououuoouuuo o 000

83

Page 91: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

uooouuaciiQ.acLa»»»»»»>uuuo C.I a. > CDo o a. > .—

<

o o a. > ^vo o t» a > Oo o a. > oo

o o 111 Q- > —4

o <_> UJ Cl. > zo o 0l a. > *»

o o o a. > v.o o UJ a. > oo o Q a. > oo o a. > oo o 5" a. > •

o o o a. > o oO o cc a. > o oo

o o a a. > vO r-1

o o Q. > CO zo o 00 a. > ^o l_) UJ a. > O o "v»

o o _J a. > 00 oa o O a. > —

<

vO —

o o z a. > 2 mo o < Q. UJUJQ2 > •u ,'• fHo o a. UJH-2< > o • t-1o o UJ a a:30i-< > o *v Q.o o X a. ozuo > O o •«

c_> C_) H a. UJ»-hUJ< > m o •-l

o D Q. Qsrooa: > z o ^»>

o l_> Lil Q. > k •

o o CO a. zzzz > o o oo l_> z Q. mm>hh > v0 n0 oo • o < Q. > z >». v0

»

o Z o X a. UJUJUJUJ > •» o m1—

1

o l~ o o Q. 1—1 1—

1

> ^H o z< --* o a: o o. <J)(J)(S><3 > •-H z "va: o o a: • a. 00 zzzz > Q. » —

t

> V o QC o 02 a. 2T <<<r< > •k *v» oot—

1

r^ o H o u_<r Q. O > —» ou_ oo o •z. o •—

i

a. »—

LUUJUJUi > CC o •»«»

1- •» o <m o UJO—

«

a. »- HUH > m* m< -^ o Xoo o z<oo Q. t—i Q.I— K-t— (— > iH 0> +2 s: o OC7^ o MC£ D_ z > 00 00 p*

•h o Z-» o 1- Q a. *—> U_U_U_ULU_ > 2 •» (^ -•»

o —* o 3 o 30Z a. LL oocoo > a -H 00

o Q o < * o OH< a. UJ > —

<

2: LA oo ro o a: a Q UJUJUJUJLJ > \~ •> m o

•—• o Z(\l o OQQH 0l 33333 > < -H LA zo < o 3Z2I Q. UJ —

1

t—I —

1

1 > a. o o v*

OT o 2Ta: o OOO a. _l <<r<<< > < r\i —*

oo o <UJ o o - Q. co >>>>> > _J •z. o ^r

s: o C/)CD u <"UJ a. < O > o o inQ o O o 00 —*•—• Q. >-* UJUJUJUJUJ oo > UJ »-H rH •_•

O u •t- o oo Qa: a. CC XXXXXOcOnO > o oo ^l"

l_> l-O <~> i-hO a. <* f-H- h-h- h-^Urnm ;> (—1 -

i

+UJ u -JO o 2 •• •• a. > > UJ o •

z o c_> oo< a. II II II II II II II II > _i UJ M -H1—

1

o • • •• o t—

i

a. > CD a: v. ot- o o xuj h- a. o > < Q. —4

3 o arm o H-H-l-3 Q. oo > — »—

1

—a u OH- u 33D- Q. ^ OCOvO > cL UJ c <— zcx o x< o Z0-H- a. 1—l—1—4 ~4 -4 s0 •—1CO > < _J •V QCCD o i-o o hZD Q. a.o3iooc£:z"ZH."ZL > > CD <o II 33 O 3 o Zh-O a. > 3 l-C h-</) o

o< o

o a>>

OO o .

^ UJa: a:

t- o o a. > »•

o o o Cl >UJ o o a. >-3 o o Q. >UJ o o a. >

UJ

oo«»o oouooouooooooooooooooooooooooo oo oo oo

8 4

Page 92: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

OOOOOOClO-CLQ-CLCLO. >>>>>>>>>>>>>oooo o Q. >o o Q. >o o Q. CC >o o Q. LU >u o O. o >o o 2 O- LU >o o '< CL h- >c_> o t—

t

a. Z >o o o o. h-« >o o < Cl > Zo o a: a. o > •-•v.

o o a. 2T > 3"0o o s: a. < > l—Oo o c a. > •oo o cc Q. _l > u- •

o o UL a. < > mOo o Cl LULLiLU > Ocoo o CO O- UJH-QC > •«—

t

o t_) LU Q. QC3 > 0>vo o _J Q. ozz > LL'Oo (_> o Cl UJt—UJ > OCOo o z D- OS LU > h-^o o < a. LULUOZ 2 > Zo o CL uji—z<2:z:i— > o »o o LU Q. a:30f-H (-i»-tLu > oo^o o X CL OZUO CD > ^oo o 1- Q. LU>-<UJ<tLULU > ZTQO o a. Q5"COor_J_ILU > »oo o LU a. OCD3 > O •

o o o Q. ZZZZZZJ > sOOo o z a. i—i (—( mk; <C<I< > 2TnO

<"» u o < Q. > > ">s.

o o X a. LULU LULU LULU > —tO<M o o (_> • a. t 1 1—IXXLU > 1-HvO

CO o o o Q_ OOOOhHI > Cl2-•» o • o cfZ a. CO ZZZZ H- > •• ••

f\J o cc o oo Qu Z <<<r<u.u_ > OvJ-s^ — ^»S o 1— t_> LL.O a. o OOli > COO — —

^

•» o Z u LU a. »-H LULULUUJ C > -OCN4 o <<-<*> o LUCO CL 1- MlIIIlUUJ > f\im o zQ o Xco o Z r\i CL >-i Q.I— 1— 1—K-3-)LU > S"0—«LU 1—

«

^ •* o oc* o mQ co a. 21 -J-JU > CO -f-HHC3 s:< -H o S-i o l-Z a. H^ U_U_LLLLU-<<2r > z. (NI0>Cl(— i-

CC o 3 l_> 3< o a. u_ ooooo»iu > o OCO> cc o < * o a 2 a. L'J cc > *~* •tf\*s,«-» «—t-4 o m o ccuj < CL Q LULU LU LUUJ—1 —1 LU > h- —*rnLL —

'

o Z<\J o CDI- CL 33333«IL > < a:m'^»- h-H o < i_> 33 (M CL LU —1—l_l—

1

II— 1— U_ > cC CCnO z Z< CO o s:a: o OZ s: Q. -J «<«QOm > < CNJ—tH-t •-H

3 2: o <LU o -H CL CD >»»hhQ > —I 2TO>CCC!(NI Of^JQ u oco o <2! •• CL < > o Cmcci-iO MS

cc QC u o o r-i o. »—

i

LU LU LU LU UJ UJ V !LU > LU '-*'-*# o Ou o o •K o CO *cc(\i a. CC IIIIIIII > Q co>j-o«- | nO-' t o

i_> i-o <_) HH CXO Q. <t I— 1— •— t^— 1— 1— 1— 1

> »-H,HQ0 z zat o -JO u LU a. > > LU u •-Hh-o-frh-s:*2T o a COLU< • • • • a M II II II II II II II > -J LUroZ<UJLL< »-i U-HH o •• •• u t-^OC Q. > CO a:*v oohOJm1- o o IO h- a. > < Cl^~ _j»—o_ji—q3 o O-UJ o l-LUt-3 Q- > K-l t-i U_ u,

O o Oh o 030- CL UZ > CC LUCl 11 O II II O II II zq: o X< o cn- a. *H —«LUi—ILL > < _l ccCO o l-O o OZD Cl •"i CM <M fNJ CCOS t-t > > CD<0 II ^11 33 o 3 o i-»-<o CL ClQSICOClI-I-Q > 31-UJ U. »-i UL H-to o < o Cl > 0<Q<N»-iSfN*—-fNJ LUu o Cl > DOhQQhJ 2)CO CC

H o o CL >O u o a. >LU u u Cl >-J o u Cl >111 o CJ Cl >

(J**^> Ui^U^<^UUUU^^^^U^<>J<-><-><J><J<-)<~><->i-)<J><J><~><J><'-}^ u

85

Page 93: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

ouououo-aao.acL»»»»»»»uuoc: Q. >o CJ a. >u «_> 0. >o 00 a. > 00o u LU a. z > LUo h- O- <t > Xo (-) < Q. t—> > <o z a. > 1o —

1

a. Ul <r > >-

u u 0. X a. >o 0C Q. K >o 0. zz > zo <_> Q. O »—1 > <o 0. z. (/^oo >o Q. 2T< X«—••—

<

> >- Xo Ql ZL(T- h-XX > U-o »—

1

Cl zo>-*z Ci<< > t—

t

2;o oc Q. ZOHhO > a •—

<_> c Ol-•(—•—• H") z 1 1 > •»

<_> 0. »-1f- t-iO0|— > X 00-* o 2: 0l Hwi/)Om LUX> > LL LU

o 1- a. i-toooctr X > t-H O(N o 3 a. (/)OQ. O hZZ > O z> o a oa zro. l-H»—

1

> *» <* o LL a. a. Z3 2: > (X K

fNJ o O- Z20Z OUJUJ > <N 00X o O. Z20Z2 0:00 > -H HH 2T•» u T Q_ ^az^o U-2^ > O O

a- o Q. o^^zrz << > 2: »-H

C\l o l-H a. rr^rro^ UJh-l- > < z 1-

•—

i

o H- a. ii Z5 000000 > •* —I (—

1

O o <a: Q. LU LULL! t—It—It—

1

> CM 00z o Z 1— rg Q. LUXUJXX 20Q > -H LU< u t- X-* Q. Ihll-h ii > 00 l_) -^^^ a.

—t •• o c£ Q.O a. \- y- OLUU > 00 -1 z< c\| o 2!Z Q. 00 LL U-Z on > z Q LU —«—

.

z•H o c£ o< a. z U_OU_OLU _JI-h- > •» Od 3

> 00 o !-<! Q. O O LU > t-i Osl UJ qcq:t—1 1—

1

o zoo a. HH O OS 2:2 > H- > LL <M(N zU- Q o <CJN a:z a. h- OZOZI-ZImh > < •» LL -^-H *t— - o x~l o< a_ 1—

I

2h-»:T»-iUJOI— > cc c\J t—

1

00 ^_< -H u o LL Q. z mImICDi-i_t)UJLU > < X Q zz X3 >- o s: - <M 0. »—t ht-hh hZOO > _J « «

•» o =3 Uir^ 0. LL 00 oc 00 oc: lu *~* >->zz > r^ LU LUCL —

1

o <t^ c_> zt- Q. LU <0<C1000IVILUU1 > LU > X ww XU X o —

<

t—11/) a. O luz uj 23ZO< a: a: > a ^ h- h-o z hM 0- <a_ lulu > f-^ ZOO

M u o XQ Q. LU QQOQh QU.U- > LU X LL MO u.o 5:0: 0. _J H-t HI HH HH002 »-" LL U- > _J 000 O

u u << a: »<m D. CD cx: oc: oc: oc: -•2 a: »-i t-i > CD z: QQ X>> o 003 cq > a. < OOOOQOOQD > < z z LLLLX o ex: X-H a. •—

»

Z > t-t •—

w 1 11 1

o o •CD O0>Q a. CC LULU UJ LULU *C LU LU LU 2> OH 00 I—

1

«•* »—

)

QQu f— uj Z O. <l 1IIIIZIIX J> <t 1—

«

1- rsifNj h-LU o JLL < *<X CL ^> 1— 1— 1— 1— 1— X5I— 1— I

> > < f-4-H < + +z o a. > LU _J 0000 _j1-1 o • • •• oo^<n a. II II II II II II II II > OH Xi HH»_H X r-^<-t

1- o hXX a. > a. u QQ O x>x o CXILU a. > _l _J

o o Oh 00 •• •• Q. a: > LU < II II < II II zIX o x< »—

1

a. CM tN > _l O OHen o l-Q (_> X 1- a. -^ ^x> > CD X> X=5 «J x Hl-X Q- CO OLLU- > n UJ U-LL LU H- Q00 o < <_> Xd. O. 1—»—*r\|c\i»-H Zmm > c X »—«•—• X C\J<N UJ Z

o Q-l- a. x>x>o <QQ > Q h- QQ K x> cx: iu1- o 23 0. >o o mC a. >LLI o Q. >"3 u Q. >LU o 0. >

o«» uuuoouoouuooouoooucooooouooooo oou uou o o

86

Page 94: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

ooooouaQ.aaaaQ.»»»>»»>uo zo o O- > 3o o o. > Zo o a. (NJ > •k UJo o o CL > o ""^ 1-

o o Z Q. 2=* > CO O oo o < o. < > —

^

O zo o O- hO > z o »—

o o X O- QZ > 3 • zo o K Q. <r«r > Z oo o 3 Q. oc > »• r^ •*

o o z a. ^^ > o og

o o (—4 Q. z > c> •^ UJu o l*o CL H-l* > z o Ulo o < a. 00O0 > 3 r* CC

o o Q. Too •—1»—

i

> Z (M oo o Org a. 00HZ XX > •» z Ul

o o —1 O- ooZCtTO << > o 3 oo o a:* a. ZOO^-t > z -7»

o o o Q- 0»-*-s.t— 1 1 > 2 •» z—

.

o o o Q. —1(— —

i

> z v. oo o ujz Ql l-i-iUJoo x> > » O a:

r\J o o x< a. t-tOOXO > > O U.f-« u u H a. ooaf— Q- zz > LL oh- o o .-t a. Qa »-H(-H > •—

«

t (/>Zl/> o o U_ o. a. zz > Q o UJ<*—1 o o a% O- , ZD3 LULL > »• CO _jl-"

Q o o Q. z2a:o OO > X H OO» o o Zoo o. 30U-Z ZZ :> U- ^ 2:< —»-»

a: o o oz a. oz ^ <<r > 1—

1

o <tcn-J o o mC Q. Z^LU K-h- > o CO -^ara.o o o H^H Q. ^ oo oooo > m ?—

UIO ooz o o <h- Q- UJ»-<UJ —!—• > oc z x»- oicor-< u z o -Jhh Q. UJI2I ao > -J o »-- O^H<NI

-H •» o H- o Ooo a. Xt-i^H > o z o ooo< <\l o CC o oc a. H- O UJUJ > oo 2T •k UJZ ozz

> o o -"a. O- i/> U-OZ XX > z <<M ^ OO z » -> •• o oc o < OL z LLC_JUJ >-»- > o ••—

H

o zo oot—

1

eg o \- o oz a. o O OUJ > -• (NIJ— o <ru) ors:Ul X o z^- o 3 Q. 1—

«

O 3 zz > K >oo o Xoo zoo1- •» u <oo o QCOfVJ a. h- ozm- (- II 1 > < ••i—

i

• o ozz<r -H (_) Io o oz> a. i—i z»-«>— UJ > c£ (NIQ o o z3 > o O^H o U-i«i o_ Z mID(D UJUJ > < X o oz oo

•» o z o Org a. »-« H-l-Z OO > -J or: ^ H< ozzH 1—1 o o o ujujz-h a. u_ ooo:»-«uj zz > o ^o o zooO X o < o ZKh Q- LLI <OMO UJUJ > UJ >f- 0^ CC ozz

o -H o »—•»— oo 0- O UJZ<Z oca: > a CM z O0 z—

«

o z-^ o H C\H-i o. <o"UjJi > -H3 => z oou < o DZXQ a UJ QQQH-0CU.U. > UJ XZ z o ocor-

< u Z> o OUJ a. _J »-i»-h»-iO0UJU.U. > -j •k •k o O^^rgz o <oc o u:lu -g a. CO cc;ct:a:>-i(— *-**-* > CO Ztt V. 2J"?-< o oo< o cos Z 0l < ooocujdo > < ao o UJ oooH- o 3 o ^>l--«< a ¥-« z > (—1 •—•00 o z z-z-zo o iZ o t^UJ>- Cl Q. UJUJUlUJ UJUJ > C£ 00 r^ o »—

1

o J—c: o co q; Q. <[ xxxxzxx ;> < t-O 1 1- -.1 '—«»»UJ o _J-> o < -_J 0. > hl-Kh'-'KH :> > oz o 32: o o UJ o o. > U i •• V. o OCOLOi•-« o • •• o OOO-^Z Q. II II II II II II > CCCC o oc ooooooH- o o mZX< Q. > CLO z CO zzzD o CCUJ o < a. > o o o oooo o Ol- o o0(_ .. •• o. > UJ3 z oo oooa: o X< o HHt/) Qu > -JZ00 o l-Q o Xi-i H- a. <N > CO » < _J -l-J-JD u 3 o H-QI-3 0. CMf\IQC-H > DO H- -J -J -J -Joo o < o DO. a. X>_J»- x>- > or- < < <<<o o UJQ-l— a. » »O00 U.U- > Org o o ooo

h- o o IZD Q. ^Hi-»Z»-H HHI—

«

> M-O o o HmO a. xxa QO >UJ o o Q. >-5 o o a. >Uj u o a. >

uv>o uuuoouuuuuuuuuuouuuuuoouooouuu uu oouoou

87

Page 95: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

toUJX< 001 z>

HHo r-z t—

1

<X

oa.

z >-> zHI

c3

oo h- zLU :*:

o o2 o UJ< -» X1- -^ 1-o:- X•—i o UL zQ

3t—

1

a•* UJ

UJZ z X 2 —

»-« X O v. LL t-»~ • r\l hi LU tM

UJ 3 UJ >• 00 #o T. z a LL #z c-

1

• 1- HH >» UJ >•UJ rvi o 00 OfM lla: < > r^Ci <f > •Z. HHUJ LL O •_• LL <r% OLL Q HH O a - HH Hu. (-H a K—

-

t-z O 000 +HI c£ < HH^Q O oo Q»~ *""* o< CM

UJ UJ o DO O 2j LU^ »X X f -zr —

»

< X X»- \- 3 1 H h-=»fc LL

o o »z 0; O < 1—

1

LL u> z: 2:1- Za: O LL Oo o 30 d_j 11 in co 30 OZ2 2i • fH zo 1

•—

z z 3 o:c! 3 3 2o r-)-H o »Z •>-JH Z •Z a: O \-HH x> HH UJ c uju_o UJ O 1— c »—

1

0C1- t- Z II IT Zhzuj 11 m _j 11 it i p- h- CJ< 1 i < t •Q<OZ • c\l < 00_J _J a:c »-ia:o q:c 3 —i3 eg cm 3 X-JH X— H.J»~ X-IH • Z 3o x> o u_o LUU- ZO lullo UJ UJ O II

-J -J hZODmu. OZODhZOD II 3 _l<r II II < CXOZOhh LJ«*D2:CS<t<S>Z 2T < <M zo o —

1

*—1 >-ic£>-> O -H OCx> •Mi 1 t-«— \--it~ 1- 3

UJ LLLL UJ z z zoz LU 00 h- OX H-tH-t X u_ Ou_ OU- ozo X t—

1

LU ZH QQ h- t—

4

oh-i

1—

(

O<M

O

h- O (X LU

ooo uuoou uouuuo i_>oo uuu u<~>

88

Page 96: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

OX Ol~ X 00 «*

3LUI- r- ro*-o0c£ r~ romhG • t •

r*J3Z(/) ro vO<r*r CM CM02

DOC « >0 ro^-10:5: -* COCuOLL.O • O

O O1—

t

ro

^2Z z xoo ^H <)

O o l-KZ»—

i

•-« 3 A A1- to 2:5-

1 1

•—

i

t-4 .-CoO o MOCD cm roo LU <u_zO-

Cl00#z#

2T o# ^- OOQJ »-•« z O LOhO< l-# t-H 4* CMl-ID •-» h- CO <r LO

<ri-o OO* COCO CC CO

(— UJLU Ott U-< U' • f

002: a.* h-UJ h- & 00

X * < LU r~ coLUOO|_ z* ZD 2! CM CMlOZH a* —•»—

1

00 CMCD DiOS •-'»{• Oct; <-<

CM LUt-i i-* a:o OX >l-oo <*1—

4

2: <<tz i-*Q < a:>o oo* 00 >*

z cc t-cc*-> * z inLU o LUH- _J# Om r\l r-o. a QU)< <* (-•X CO LO r^0. c£ LUCD> k-tt Q^K CC 00 CO

< Q. WOoi Z* OO: LU • •

o LU O* O 1- in CO_ii~oo IVl* s:z lu in tnOOCQ >-*» \~ 2: ia cmUJO OCX DD (M O

llq: 0* —1 1^. r-o^o X* DC OOLU * O 4" -*

ZZH Z*o«-*< 3*t—

i

_J o*H>UJ z*<COQl **-J a:3 o 00O o Z_J z O

H < 3 »-«

3 u t-a. a: <1- Ul o h-3 X LL 00O 1-

LL.

cc OLU a: CMh- LU LU3 2: X CO 2:a. < a. 00 _is: Z fHo O. 2: Xo

<(Xo

O fH CM ro >J-

O O OO O O

• r-t —

<

ro. O O O

1-2: O O O00 • • •

O O O

O O OO O O

LU >* <|- 1—

1

O00 O «fr f-za: O r- CM

»-«<tLU • • •

cc\-\- >t LO nOcjjoom CM O r-

-.2: «J- CO <fQ —

1

-a

OO

• >r in CO >*•

• co O ^h

t-OO <^ >t CM<t-H- oo • • • *

»— * t-t -^ r-* i-H

<«Q-X-* Oo# O

LU-k O>* Oo:* LU CM -O vO OLU* >U! • • • • •

00* oc:_ioo ro ao CM r>-

CO* LUO ^« *H0* ooz

ea<r • in —4 in inO 2: in ~4

• vO cm O r-O >r CM a> r*

CM CM 1—

CM

00

00a

U- *. 2:O LU

CC CM < y-LU LU CD z2! X 00 O*) LU 21 << Q. 00 O0 Z _l a:Z 1—

1

O 3 OQ. 2: 21 O X 2;

89

Page 97: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

XX UJ

tr.

oo#

.-««o0#a*CL*

Ott

I-*<*00 •*

*UJ*O0#c£*Ul*>*<#cc*I—w*

O*UJ*00*o*_J*o**

u_*o**

o*UJ*H*<*-J*x*O*-J*<*o*Ul*cf*Q.*

oo occ oto

x cX)2: s»-. o< IX

tD

oo ooUJ <I— UJ<•z. oOa:Ooo

a:

O

hi Xa:

<x*

o

a:

o

occ

o2*

O

«/>

t

Q

*O>*•

O" >3"

CC oUJ t

H- 0>

UJ r-2: <M

CO

o£>

oo(NJ

oo LT\

a: COUJ t

I— inUJ inSL in

<Nr-onJ-

o o O O O O Oo o O o o o oco CO co CO CO co CO

h- r*- o r- o o r-o o in in •H —

1

-^• • • • • • •

vO O in ITi CO CO in—

i

-H -^ —4 mCM r\l CO ro co CO m<\I <N i-H i—

<

C\J (NJ m>o ^O 0> 0^ 0^ cr no

<fr s0 (M o m ^H rn

m oH CM (N f—

t

(NJ ^ m CM vT fO in

Ai

A1

A1

AI

A1

A1

A1

-^ (N c\j ro ro

com

o-*

o

r>

r-•

mo>mo

o^o>

CM

00

o

«*

min

>i-

o>•

coin

o

inooo

o^

COro(M(N

CO1—1

oo(NJ

COin

ON

o

1/0 </) O0

o o UJo o l->! —4 UJ>r rH 21 •

00 (NJ OO» • O C£

CO C\l O UJ 1*-

0> (- r-<

-^ UJ vQ• • o s: ^0

2: 5T •

v0 00v0

o O o(NCO

o

• t ^HQ Q •

oO O • •

00

O

oo (-21 cc 00 UJO O»—

i

QL (X 2:h- ex UJ << UJ a. h-h- 00 ccoo

a.X £X

a O ccu, ^ 5: X cc cco o UJ 2: cc a UJ

CM < H- •—

«

UJ r—

1

UJ CO z rvl CC UJ >s: OO oo UJ 2: < < X O O< oo oo 2 _i a: h- 2T <2 o a X _J X _J < CC

3: 2: Q X 2: <O

21H-

1

<O

1-V)

X

U ^-» 04 m <f in h- < H- <

90

Page 98: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

lis*2:#»-•«oo#

oOttUJ-H-

cc*<*ZO-M-

00*I #h-#00*<»•LU-U-

-J*•M-

CO*#

O)*

o*H-ttH-1-H-

OO*Q##

o#•-I*

I-*<*J-*00*

LU-frO0#ct:#U-l -Si-

rs'*<*

ID*OO*O*-J*o**

U-*o**

Z*o*1-1*h-*<*_l*3*O*_J*<*o*

QCXt-LU

OO

<>ccLUOOCOo

>CO

OOLU

Qct:

aau

o00

o

oo<LU

a:o

O oo

o

a:

a

cc

O0cc

LU

ooa:LU

UJ

00

o

oo

LU

ooo

0>oin>*•

ro<t-

a>

o>0

ooo

0>

oo>t

mo^

ror«-

o

<COOOooo

rooo

oo•

(M(N

00ov0

r-

CNJ

oo

ro

omo^•

00tnCM-a-

r*-

o

LU

UJzQ

O(NOOOa

cdt—

1

LU

OLLo

a ~h <M

>LUoQ<Qz<oo

LUX

cc<ooLL

oo -J

Q111

\-00

<

O0

O

>LUOQa:<a<oo

LUX

ooozooLU00

o00

in

LU_J

CDz<

00QzooLU

00

COLU

00 00

sO>*LOroor*f\i

**•

s0

vO<NLT\

Hror-^^

LU 111

00QOOLU00

os0s0v0CO

v0

roro

rg r\i

II II II

rg ro >tf-

LU

LUCC<i

ooLU«_)

z<vi oo>-* CCO LU

CD O Oz z z<l < <

oLU(-O0nQ<

oO0

o

>LUQacc<tQ<00

LUX

•4-

or\l

oooo

LUo<00—IQ

OOcc111

LU LU

or\j

OOOO

ooccU!

OCMOOOO

II II

<\J ro

% %LU LUO Uz z< <oo oo

91

Page 99: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

<

a.

tOI—

i

o

oo zZ o Xo ^ (- K•-) to X>

H m "SL 2:l-i o HI DGO UI M cCO OC < LLQ. a. to*

z*z _j 0* OOCX .-H* z»-*or3 h-M- t-H

HXOf i-i# H<|— UJ tO-fr 00 10h-UJZ 0* LU <</>2!X> D-# h- UJ

* <UJooX Z* 21 Ol/OZI— O* —

1

»-i

ccO*-* 1-.* Q a:OK-.-C K* a:=>i- <*<<rto H*cc>z to*i-cco * z

UJHH _l* •—

1

QOOH- <* 1—

1

XUUcD<t I—

*

on K000> z* O 0£

O Q£ 0* O_jh-ll; M* 2: Z0000 H-l# 1—

LUCQ cc:* r> Ou_a:o 0* 1—

1

Om X* a:oo *2ZW z*

at-i»— 3*»-i < 0*»->_l z*<CDUJ **-J alz> a:

_j< 23at a:X

oa:

o

l/>

toa:UJ\-

IU

toa:UJ

cozo

00

u_OUJ2:<z

XQ.

OO

00 «tr» cor- m

• •

COCNJ <m

-O co—

1

mOO co

-I >t

AI

CM

COCO

O

AI

(NJ CO

«*in

^ CM^- in

co• •

^ co

r- coCM r\l

co <N1—

1

vO O

^0 <tin

CM r-in r-4

CO co• •

in COLH inin (NJ

CM Of- r«-

«* <f

oX

z<a:O

*

oI-

<#1— *<*Q**O*

UJ-M-

>* Qor* UJUJ-fr >00* OHCD* UJO* 00

CO

t

ato

</i

UJ00

a

00zo»-»

<00

OoI—

t

oo

o oo o<-* coo oo o

• •

o o

O OO O

UJ «* Nfr —

1

C/) >t r-z a: N rsj

*-i < UJ • t •

cc I-- h- ^» in >o00 IJU <NJ s0 r>-

H-

1

s: Sf ro >*

a -^

OO

•«« in ro >tCO O r-l

a> «t <N O

O OO OO OO OCNJ O -0

• • • •

ro CO CM r->* -^

ir\ h inm fhin

n0 CM O r»«* (M O* r^-

Osl CM -H CM

X. 2:UJ

UJCNJ <

COt-

2X O0 to UJ 2T <a. V) to T* -J ct:

t—

Z3 O aQ. 2: 2: O X 2:

az

CM CO

92

Page 100: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

OO-M-2"#<T*

H*m4OOttO*O.*

Z#

(-*<*H*O0##

LL*OO-fr

CC>LU*

cc*

O*UJ*00*O*_J*

#u_*

*

UJ*h-«•

<*_J*O*O*-J*<*O*UJ-*C£*o_*

CC

32:

<

UJ00

o

occLL-

CSz

00 00Li' <.\- UJ

<z QQDCoo

a:o

cc

o

X

ex:

O

cco

5:oa:

00zo

<00

OUJ2:<z

uz

00

>4-

•4"

00 >tccLU •

H o>LU r-3! <NI

CDO>o

OO(NJ

oo inCC 00

UJ •

\- inUJ in

2: in

cni

r-

^

CNJ

0000o

O O O O O OO O O O O O

CO co 00 00 CO CO co

r- r» r- r- r- r- r-& m in .—1 —

1

rH• • • • • • •

NO >o m in 00 CO in<-i —

1

H

1—

1

co

CNI tNJ co m co CO coCNI CNI ^-1 r-1 CNJ (M co

O O O O* CT O<r vD CNJ O co —

1

co

m —

1

r\j t\l ^cni —( m (\l ^ co in

A1

A1

A1

A1

A1

A1

A1

(N N fl fO

COcocm

co

p-

oSO

coP*•4-

«tp-

ocoocop-o

<CO0000o

CNJ

o>

CN)

co

o

com0^t

00inCNJ

p»o

UJ

UJZ3a

m

in>o00co

t

aoCOCNJ

CNI

•Hn0

00-400CNJ

CNJ

00mCNJ

o>r»o

ax

00 00 00a:

O UJ

O Kv3- —\ UJ<r <-4 2: •

00 CNI 00• • cc

00 CNI w r*-

(^ 1— ~*

^^ UJt • 2: nQ

2: 2" •

CO•0

O -0CNJ

CO CNI

t • r-

1

Q O •

OO O ••

II II

00z1—

t

1-

1-

II II 11

CC 00 UJOcC or: zcc UJ <UJ 0. r-

00 orX cc t—1

h- O Q ccZ> ct: ccST OCT Q UJ1—

t

UJ -»z. ivi DC UJ >-< < X Ou. 1- 21 <

—1 3 _l < a:2: < 2: < h- 3

p- t—1 r- 00 UO M M U

in 1- < H Q <

93

Page 101: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

»-* >* CM5"* in rou * • a> Os:* O • o r-(

•-* H- 5- o oCO* CO • •

=5* o o~5*O*<**

CO* cd <N C*

LU* z <N 00a:* *-t in ~H<t* h- CO in oZ>* co co cc >! oo* LU <I LU • •

c:* f- UJ h- ro CM1* <r Ul <t- CM

I-* *L o 2" 0> —

I

OCO* *—1 1—

4

o CO CM<r* Q cc o o r-LU* a: cd s0 o cm_J* Q o o* O O in>* X o r- in 00

CO* K —

1

o o* U< o • m *r o> LU

CO* z: 1—

1

a % o o o CC:z* cc h 3T o o • <o* CO cd CO • • <N LU>->* 2 o o tx COi—* a s: <T LU>-•» »—

i

1— OCO* H- 3 CO 2:D* <f LU <a* > cd 0> 0> CO _J i-* cC z o <M —

i

cd co CO CO CO co CO co COz* LU 1—

1

CO o —

^

Q Q a Q ¥-i a: CC CCo* CO X CO >* m H < Z 2 z 2; Q LU LU 1X1

•-•* CO H- CC r- o> X o o CD o i- 1- HH-* o a: LU # • CO Q CJ o O o Q UJ LU UJ<T* o 1- o> CO t—

1

UJ LU LU LU UJ IU 2: 5" s:I-* t— z LU m in UJ t- CO CO CO co 1—CO* o s: 0* CM 3 co co >t m c\J

* LU a m »* ID z> -H vf r-LU-W- a: i—

i

h- N 1- -5 <J- m in 0> —) vO 0> I

s-CO> >—

i

CC o O t—i Q sO <f ^ m a >o r^- >t-

QC* o o ^r Sf Z < 0> <M -o rn < in <r\

LU* z z> >* <N o in 00 p>- in>* —

LL in 0> f*- m LL >o vO >f<* LU O in CNJ 0> f> O r\l og r^-

c*:* > a <f o in m O O»-* CO CO m ^ (Nl ^H CO O O* z z o ^ in -O z • • •

c* co o c nI" vO in <N o O OUJ* Z (—

1

t—

1

• t • • t-1

CO* o h- H —i (M <N O Hc* 1—

t

< < <-J* h- i—

i

t—

1—

«

CJ* < > > >* t- LU LU LU 11 II 11

LL* co O Q aO* a. t^ CM m* LL *: s: Q Q II II II II Q

z* O c_> LU cc cc CCo* < h- < < -H CNI m >fr < % =tfc **t

t-t* LU co Q Q a(-* s: CO LU

~2lt

~UJ LU UJ

<* < CO 2 < < % % «: % < O-J* z o 3 H H h- z: Z zX>* s: Q co co LU LU LU LU CO < < <o* -J _J _J _l h- \- 1-_)* UJ IU CD CD O CD LU C0 co CO<* a ~h CM X X Z Z Z Z X 1—

t

1—1 t—

1

u* 2 D- H < < <l < h- a Q

94

Page 102: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

oouoouanao.D.>»»»»>»»»»»»»»»

UJ z>LU 2X

LULU cC t-4H-

0> O NO •

o't-* 2* LU <SO0 •

LUt~ 3 O »-i2"00

>0 O OnC2*<t<r 2" 2* o£<i;»-t(r •>

o-a: i/> ^ -< <r i— »-« uli

h- UJ LU 3><:h|- V,'

I— _J U- OO CtUV/*-" CCCZ CD O • UU C<CW OLUhi < (/)_!• U_CQ0lO LU00 •-• XZOUJ CL Ooct: CL • h- o 2: o ooz_jo <oo • #o »-i • < 2* ujllz 2*

O >2Tco oos 1—00 < hh^C •-•

UJ OZ 2"»-< i-tifj O H • Z>Z)t— -<0C_J >hO Oivj t/)_l UJ O0O0 CLCL<I— CCOh SI— t-H •-«< OO > t-HCt 5!5Ih-<I »0

U_ 2Z»-i(— •»— D.Z ££ OU! DOWh -z.ee2* Z5C0k-.*/)<O «4 UJ I— OO 00 <a.U_»<r DOWZHm 2: »O0 QLU • UJ mU!Q_t— CLOOOOct: 2O2*C0 UJ?"U'LL:IJjOrU.u Qo<r uj o-t-t a oii"<c ct oxxc^oo <ru_.Q IZ K-U) 2!>»-' DZZhhaia ct_i

u_ (~S2T< l/'u! ^ctouj to»-H<r >uj • o0> 02t-ct:X UJ<X < I- II llOoiZZ

CO • II ZTOcOUJI— U-OOCth- UJUJoO o:<Om<2! O *^2" > OCO Sloe-*-*-—f-ctia:o<a:oo bc~.< 11 oz 11 2*o<\i<\i h-o:l£_j»-.j—<—(lit zsa: a: *~i u_< mmu_ luO<>-<02:xujOh-— uju_ — o»—a ou_ ctri—<acoz3i— xz* -t coauj<M • torn— ouuaro_J >-0 h^lL<- 2 _irOOc£t-«C£000')<J5 OUJh-3a:uJ »U_ Ooo DaCO 2*UJOZ)rNjrs42"OZ*OUJ^SOll-LL O 2"UI2:«—OCC oo<r^K^^<UJl'l_lh- —1 OOUJUJ CQ<00OSO<U_cQXt-H|— —IX<t2T—12:0 set: ujs: oujoujujooi— »—1001-otu<Z)2*ouj<tt--t loozoozair » •>a:oo»-«2*

zoi-H2:2:2ro h-2*uj< z> -»-'0<o< 11

CCcl.*-* «Im< •• t > •»QUJ00LL(N|r\J2CUJoosqkh 2!uj-»cc 11 u:a:~»2:x<oroco -j^iooU-U-CC-hocoO X>t2" XUJc\|<H-U.: 00<K-n

ujso<uj»~—'O—»k-torn zz*<WMM|-hNzzi-oziui s:»-H*t cq uj 11 02:2:0:0:00<OO <Z> H II Of——' II O— h- UJOOMtvlOOH- 1— UJmhI "QO LUhhCN ZDQI <<— t- OfMi-t*-1 11 — a:oo»—<uj02:t-(— uju-cq n 11 ujuj -o-o.a:>-ct:ct: mMU<h-iZMZ xoo xij:UOU-2(JO^ -OO.I— 2"h-<2:Z) II \r- * •——«H-|——

(

2 inc\| - i/)Z> •> O «"•—•<MC\J ivl

II II 3 II II »ro— »»0 II -* O"- II CNCNjrOn II ll <Q-»-*-4- ^ -«0-»c\j cnj mro UJ

^«^—'UJUJO — »r0 2 w^.QQ (-1 -O >QDZZU --HI— — H^oIDOmh mQHi 2t-i>-<<f <tUJ f— 2f>—Q 2*1— »~4MivJQ£ Ct <T-H

ho 2: cccc 2* 2: cc 000 dwo«ooo:u.nQ.X "JOOHCCm hOZZ OMCU.c0ZLUaM<OO OZUJWI-O tOU<< UDt~UUUOlllQlil

uo^ouooooooooooooooooooooooooooooouo<w»ouooo<->

O O a.O C3 a.

O (_) a.O 0.

O U 0.

O O 0.

t-> O a.

O O 0.

O O Q.

O u> 2* aO CL

O »-• a.

O K- O-O c; < Q.

O h- a.

O (•) 0.

O 0.

O LU a.

O CO a.O QC a.

O UJ a.O > 0.O < ex.

O ct: a.

O K a.O i_> • Ol

O u-O Q.t_) 00 Q.O X O.O H a.O 2*U! CLO • OS CLO 2" »—

1

O.O 1- t-oo CLO 0£ <2* CLO -IO CL OOO al Om CL ZO t- 01- CL OO Z _J< CL HH

•^ O < a. H<r O X oa: CL t—

1

O O UJ CL Z> O S-J- 0:00 CL -1•—

1

O 3C0 aco CL LL.

U. ^ O <o> U.O CL UJi— O —4 CL O< UJ O 2" Sl- CL2 X O < » <u CL UJ

O 21 aruj CL _JO <^ OQC CL CO

2* 2" L_) OO'H o»-« CL <•-H •* O QCQ CL »—

1

> CNJ O •O 0-2: CL a:2 <l S. O h-ZJ »—

I

CL <l-i a: < u -J< < a. >H- l- OO > CLt/) • • •• OO CO Cut-H •—

1

CL-J CULL) 00 CL

Ol- 002: CLz x< hO CL< l-Q Xhh CLa: O l-l- CLO < t—

»

CL00 CL

a: CLa.

CO

"3<-J

a. CLa.CLCL

95

Page 103: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

>>>>>>>:>>>>>>>>L_>0000— •-•Z<> CM QZ5CD O

CO > rrOO— - OO v.LU > «-QNM -^ -*.CJ >h- > »<ro—» <r ^ —

.

O zco < > t-ico *-»*ro sO-^ «--*(M 2:Ci LU Z > cc-»zcr:-~ »-co OfNjro Z5 H-l

CO X f* > (JS<IMO><t<X) Ofn- CO »-CO 1- DO > UOHO'UJCvO'M LU-^Q •» <cCO arm > OOCOOC2"^vt CXSTM *«^ h-CO LU Q oco > * »MoaD(~— i-iO<CO h- z 00 > COZO •,3C0210 QZU.C o_2: 3 < 0-1 > (VJ^H •—» •> »>CQ-^ <Oh 2:2- Z > rvijro:<N-»X ;*: —M — »-Z •

• 1—

«

x a > <Z3om<tc>—

2

D

.2Ih-i 1—

1

ua 2: |-<NI»->LL > UJO <0"— *-'ST -4" • OrvjfMCL •^

•c O 3*q:Od > fflXCD'O" OrONa ^ XZQ Z •» 2: > cof*»Zu.;>-Hco »>t _j«—< * !"

l-H

< L : •-HQ COX > *-t<4-<ICOCi- *"J"vO -OLU3: h enMS LU MZZLUh- > Mtvj »<o-- •» 00 -a. z h-t-a; LU OL «X «=t |— 1— u_ > <r<o ujn-^ hZQ • « <<c h- O 0<T2I > ai ».n0-^ »ro2:^o o<oja >^ 2:h-u. O UJ o-< z > •ororvj—.—-co-' X *MCOco 2E i-h LUhhCO > «-Hsro>r> ••-< LJ(N<< D u_< »—

t

gc:%xoz > rsi2:z3-'^-<-^5: -^Ui - OOCh- ST h-a:o > r"ioz>-oi->tz a: - -\— •

UJ"< • h- CO 0»"H > —'Q Z'-, _JvO » a:'-t2:z O COQ.QQ •- ULZU-OI- > CO -OCOctLU—

LU^—« * "V _JZLU z oooo<t > isj«j-z<rOD5->t •• »-r->j—

3

CO HHC£HOLU < l-H > > <roo »-z -U-vO O—< •> »—

1

<IODOdt t—

1

ZH zluo: > cQnZh •.—. •.—

«

(— ITMJJ— hocro-uio Q OmOIUJ > CO 0<f -21— <\l—

<

Z » •"r>J XLUOCZCOLU < •—iCOhh(— tO > z •» •.h-r>^ro>fi- ZD«tQm 1— mQLU HH Q CC l-OH- CD > -»^O^~~n0_J a—-hw a ct:<a<QO > t—

1

(\ICOZ KflXwLLI UUJNX V, h-h-LULUZLH LU —1 1— LU > h- rOcOr-iCOO<OQ ••2:<tivi O <z_io<o O OZOh-h- > < —HHMi-iLUh-O * «LU< Q 2:»-hoz Z Z OlmO-COO > or coQ<Oa:_i»—

t-Z -LL O oc:

•Z<LU< < -JLU2TOLU > < M » -Ot-^LUtn^t Zl-CLO • 1— CLQ<II-I •X <30-3oc: > _l <Na:i-QQ »n0 IDCOl- O XZ U3UZU OKUQm > <_> LL>—(•-1 •• > *~~»•*•* »Z3: -O 00oui z <r lu <ro > LU LJlVlU-NJ—-*^^ 0^=>2! m *-*7ZUlifiQC»-HO£" cdcDa: z > a *<M<CMfNJvO»-- »>tOLU ^» LUuji-osaoo O OQm > ~t •-^crCro^ •» •• HwOh SCOCO IX. LL<LL LL.LULL.h- > LU >--H »Q»-»^^-^» ..(M « » >o zz

II •• CC • O > > -J -r <M-»OcOQ vO >4" \~ 1—mo rn o<O LU LU LUOLUIiLUUJCO > CD Sisjrg OO-'O z<^2: 2: L'J >»zwzujzozzz<zz > < D<rOMZhS • Z>»— LU x> COZ O< (M i~tLU *-* 1- »-iC »-• J— •-< i-H LU > 1—

1

Q «.*-rvi<c02>t Oc0>ff- Z>v z N.Mi-a:»- 1—Oh- COh-l— CO > oe

- H|-< •• >0 "-^ •• *o <h- Ouxoooooujoi-hooci: > < Z(NJCOU_Z-^Z— ^— »^.^ V.Q U-!hh h-hUlOUlOZOWOOODUJ > > owwmoncx ^<t--.(M OO z z13 a:DQCOa: ct ccaL> > MHQCl-lf'lHZQ o_>^iriro O • • * t-H

Z -CQ CO OCDQ CD LU CO CO< > coQ •> «</>—co *<t G-^ •"-' OO l-O a:wZDaDuj^ZJi-JDa > 1—» •'^COt—i<1»—•—»Q f-c\i2: •^ M CL2: rs) coh- co co00 <t co 1—coco h- > 0-»N<UQO«tl- co<r<)M OX 11

•NJ > lu rgm _j lu »— lu sQ co LUh-—'< V.O t •» ^< II II II 11 11 11 > aTir^^-'MQicoct: • * QcoLUcD 02: hQLU > Q_—o<a. *c>t—

»

SO 2:0 h- s> QZ » Q >0^ 0C-"< •• OCO II z 2

•. > Lu»-H<coa<oLu—>o LU>*Z— z * 1—

t

0.Q a: CO < > _jc^ •j-'_j>_i2: •> o~c:(M ^ 2o:CNJCO CO 2: z ooc- > CDtJJOslOcD »CQ2^ IU2TI— 00 <o CLQ. <MSI 2: Q < >h- > DZ>U-DOD| • h-o — ho h-<Q Q CH h- xco > cushooozj: ZUJZQ <o LLU_ <LUl— O o_i >

>>>>>

Q ZDQXDCQ> »-Hn

OOOOOOOoOOOOOOOOOOOO 00 00 UKj>UiJ>^J<^ uo

96

Page 104: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

UJ

<o

I

h-3Q.Zi-i UJ

x »-•

I- H-

a: h-o Zo •—•

-J a.< O-

ooooooooooO 00 sO -^ <Ni s oo ro -^"

vQsO^O^OvO^^OvO^O'O

LUUJUJUJUJUJUJUJUlUJ»—h- I— »— I— H- >— I— I— I—

a: cC a. a: cc oc cC al cc oc33323:33233

<zUJXh-

QUJ z> <

LU»-<_lh- •*

t-iLJ Xu_<r 1—

a: Doo<IU1 zzh-h- HO<Z IVl»-t

UJ 0»-« <H00 »—

4

lljo: >> *0000 UJ COCC da<*> ZQ.UJ<t « >—

«

o><* H-»- h-Z -^

<H- « 003 oa: OO <o a <MJ-Q ujz H-

UJ oca: ^ OZOO UJUJ •» O h-UiO H-H- o OU- oQ.-J ZZ i—

i

ZO oou i-a.

UJUJ oX

•—

1

X""* o

II II o II II o 1—a:

<N "",

—*r\j ooooo -^C\J •"* oz

• ^OLn^or-foco o ujm •

oo >r>r>r>r>T>r oo «* Q •a oZ z 01 •—

UJO o 1-1 a: o n •

i

••nO -O n0^ vO »—

1

•b O »—

<

<Nh- «4- h- >t «^OoOUJ h-a. a. m s: OlUiD II Q-O w o **0 h UQZ O

LUUJLUUJUJ o II t-\<~*

o DHhl- H-H- Q Q _ t-O-w< ^t »—* t—i •—« t—i »—

< < h- oo zoUJ \u&.cCQi.cLO- UJ UJ UJ UJU- QOU.a: ££33333 or: cC o Qm O-Jhh

uuooo <J><J>U<~H-)<J><~> ououou ouoouuu

97

Page 105: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

II

m in lu m<-i f-i <r _<

II ll h- II

• * in —i »co >— — -H r-l S -^

II X SI—

• —I —13 3 t-l

5^ ^ * a o *•» •> . » „ »-

•—I 1—4 —

»

SI"^—» 00 t—

I

»-• i-t fH

UJ LU CM QZZ Q UJ2: 2: — «oo - 2:<r < —• —< lu hcqq 2: < >-i hz z > > 2: >-1 -1 2: > >h- 1-2! 2: < 2:2: s; 1- 2: 2"

00 »/> 2: 2! 2T 2T3 =3 00 21 21ZS'H d-*i— DOi-f-ioo 3^ 3*^

m ^ 2: 2:^ —tt-HH-irro m 2: 2:— -» —2: —2: ^>qqdh « -»2: -.2:o— n-» -"•-« z>«-»«-» 3-» -« rnHQs: o— —«-. -d-*.— 3 aH- O l—O OO OO OS 3 fNjr-t t- o OQ OQ H-

or*- or-oo>o 00-0 o Ovod 11 11 11 o or^-ooo oonot-ioom OfNjror^->tro 11 covom 11 on omo »h 11 11 omrrir-^-m 11 covorn 11 o

h «-* ••</? —» »-oo •> *oo *</) *• «»co cnjcm(nqc:2: —» *»co • *o * *co **CLO vOLU -OLUOs0LU»-4On0UJ»-in0 vOLUoO tOO<\IC\l sQLUsO vQLU»-«^vOLU»-iOO^h QO f\J Q O Q DZwwwSO O r<"> O O Q O >t0>t ^- s0 >— .—— ^«~— ~-«~ w c O ——O *- **—• —*»*- «-*0_J-* • — • ^ _ — ^(-DSWU II • w w w •

-^ •• HJULU O LULU LULU OLULU QLU LU <*JLJ<*J —*<NO UJLU LULU QLULU QO LUH>0ZhD|- 2T|— Q|— I— Q1-1I--I—Q»-h»— (—Q_JLULULU_I-^KI—I— Z|-Q|-l-CMhH Oi-i|— 21

ll »»-H<t lu •t-«z>-n-«i.cc>-<t—<zcc>—-^>—<i.—ic£ccsx.—kn<<. lu »»-i<t-n-i<i.ct(-i»-i«i(x lu •

n — a:uJ03 (XLUDiQCLuoa:(XLuOQcma:Lu<»-<i-ii_i<jM|— t—od aiLUQCiXLuOQictLuoooiH M3oiOZM3a:S2(i:Z22Q!:UJ2 -3a:OQQQo<WlOOZi-i2a33a:Z33a:UJOZt-<

OLU I—*- I—— I H<—OD -• 2T 2T 21jzoau. Ou_ Oil cu.Mh-2i-1 Om (_)i—i <_)•-«

h-

OOOO

o o o o

98

Page 106: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

II

mtu

COr*+~* -^

«-* ^%in rH

a» CO >-»^H .—

»

SII 2: 21

rH^ 3 3** O Q

•<•> •»

en-* 2:—

COi-( -^ ^Hw^ ror 2:» z>>-<-^ 3

ixiro qjj:Z— 33<u_ HQQQ 2:Z2 >»H -h

H-< SSww 2:COZ 213 3

1- DDhh-tOO—co O -ZZ —tw rHH-lt-H:2:0-» —>OQ3'H

««• —

»

—» 2!l II II3?O 02 3 rO>t

or-o 0-03 II II II OHff|<^ OcOO -t II II

m^sO r-^ ***••~»—

>

^H »M-

(

<—> -*- 21-.^••CO * co romrna:^:sOUJ-O sOUJCO co3mmO Qr-^—2:0w ^ ^ O Q— wHD2WU

H

111 LU LU OOO —»<Ml-Qh H-0-JLULULU_J>}-|-l-*-> <t hh— "•<>. —J a: a: ac -J en <i<x ujq: uj exm a: uj< •-< •-< t-i<m h- t—

3

2a:2 2a:oooao<cocoz

coLU_lo

QLU

ct:

LUcoCOoLL

oc£LUCO

3

OCO

co>

33

2! co

33oa QS

I— U(2:3DZo*-<

o

3ao

oOLOK-coroz

—1

COOvOLU

II

X —

o<LUcc

LU K-i-ozH<3D.LUCSoro

COLU_lo

oLU>UJCOCO

oLUX

<LU

3O

33OQ5-33300 —

c\| Q^ —<Qf\IH-l— CO >

-^>-h>ZZh ~2T— -» 2: 2: 2: »-«»-. 2:— 2:

02:32:003 03O O-ODOOmhOO-ODO -*mO O unmvO n0~H — II II II LTl^H II

I—t .^ «-- II <—I

*CO CC «•«•-*» */,*"•^>0 vOLUCOCO-* ^OLU

>M UJ| LU Q5:Z »-«hh»-i Qt-i•I 0CO3 —3— QQH —mSOZm Z -HO —

K-i t-H uj»-ilU «— LU—I— II I— I— I— C3>_J I O2TC0H-O<

O Z mZm<J_I(JUOOm<Doll. Oc\joiOa:uj<<zzzza:ujH—i»-h o^2U3o:<Jo««3q:w

oo

o—o

oo>om

Z vO3-* OO ~-0>O •

l-LUOHOhH

OOU<-><J><*-><~> UOUOu

oCO

o

99

Page 107: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

in

il

zo

oQ.

OUJ2:

<CM —1 ~H < co

O ^ > > O z—4 m s: -• 2: in cc < 2:—

1

CD-- *r 3: >- 3:3 21 Z>

1—<

3O-H O >* QHS Q-H O —

O zUJ I- Org ^ >-3 > h- 1

1

1 Xu | OvO — SZD —SI »» J-z o C -h —» — 2! «— 21 DO z—

»

3 UJ< Oh h-— - OD+ OD Oh h- Cl X1- z z oc 1 o O-OQ O-OO Z ZOf- Z H-t/> ~»3 3<-* rn 1 m >*-m cor^-m -.3 3mm •—

t-t O O _.H 1 nO o-h 11 »-«m.-i 11 O CO—

1

1 LL. •—

>

Q -HO o • ^ .—» •• Q>—< •• O—iO *—* «. h-h- •*+—tuc 1

<—t •» m«o »</>—» 1- •k •V) < ZO Z • II nOhh o vOUJ t— vOUJ Z • II —1 vQlJJ 1- »—i l/>

-• _>o • •—

i

UJ 1 LU Oh CJi-( JO (_> <I QE. _Jcc QUJQ II (XU3 —3w II _ UUJZ II

~-» u a. »—

1

—4

CD O »H m20Zm»h 2! w-.« —-w •»— ~1 < m

z t—

»-H || |»-4 UJ COUJ z »—

4

Ui h- 2: H- OIll UJ II I-3UJ •— »- II II hhl-Ql-Ml-ClQaJ II K3UJ h-Qui 3 X LU3 X 0.030 z fZm<WQm<QD 0.030 >-'<3 a. h- Q •«—

Z h- QOOZ^ii a >tm a: a: lu t—o a: ujh-zzauzoccmz z. »-«

»—

i

1- HHliH»H o^^2USa:Qh2c:w h-«K- >-**-* 30l(-i >-1 Q£ h- UJ1- Q 2— h- h-Z— 1— 1- O Z 1-z < 3 Z 23 z Z Q O >-i »-«

o UJ OU- DO OCU. 00 O .2 -J a: CCo CC <_>»-i UQ UUM UQ O UJ «S a. 3

o o 1 o o O Oo H 1 CM ro •4- m nO

uuuuuu uoooooouuuo

100

Page 108: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

< to «—

J— •. CO ••

CO — O —•> *h 2: <r

~. — < I->-. to • z

-. w O — 3Q Z CM

in -. <t *: oa: * —

'

-'^h o •— s: s:

lu h o cr>

it — -z. -z-» 3: <r <r

_i ,_ o *» * ~- •>

*£ w 2: — —q < lh rg in <

•• »—

1

*. •. i^ » 1

a-» -» -t — ~t z—. 0»-« — »H O. 35 —

2T— — II O II Oh »-co mo 2: o m;£ «—

O

»0 —« <Z *-» —' —' »

o •» mm hz ^ * 2*: q hr»-»-« -a: <r — cm OH —l»-i II •» - LA ^ •• Z "

_ n o — <t—uj *:-* ^ -» 11 —.5^T •••—

1

H 1—I —t Q "H un

0< «»—» -'-t^: :*i o *: »•OZ HS II

•> •• I— » «H|— ^U -» «— H — OOt-i II —

-»CO »»LU —

«

—I * «—

I

HOC —<:*: Q «* i£ — «— l£ i-H

ro—» —'i-« *: » o » •• ^i

IX-Q *-» I— OUJ M N UJ —• •. s: » —t-4 CO O^S *- S^ 3! —I >*

o <t—> *: » h< in < ^t t—w <n oa: < —tot: ro—i COO UJ— H l—l— 2! I— Mh ——»LU

.-t —O 2ZLU C£. CO UJ<2"O *UJ <2I — O— I- i-h 0<- 5TI-<

•<n mo: z:< o —oh- <zrrCtCM »-h J—2 I— — *» 2351—Oh —Q 00K co — D, — -» O j-Oco <

•-(••. •> CO t-4.-j O h- OO COO F—a. voo o»-« —

o OvO 2: o o so «——»—• <rOrg 00 r*-*-1 l »h d -t 1^ —»—

1 <t o-^-^—.-^-^^»C «—»H O— *-»-^—»—»-»^,-^„ -« «,^ O .-H-^f-l t-» —.q—« — 1

_J • -^(M QLU •• O —IfMi-i rH » |— t—OOOOOO *OUjC »H- OOOOOOOO OHZ^O -h »^ » ^OO OCOO O 3)HC\im>tm^0—tUJ|— h- n0< oooO^OHrvjro^ mz • M H so— >0 t n >t *^ O ClOOOOOO *t-i LU I— OOO-ihhhh <-H_J —cm + < LU^-<M ^(—.h O iCr-l—l~4r4r^r4 II QiUD-CO ^H ,-)<-* -4HH-HH HDa II —0>- Z; -H<H H HH

* •.«.•... « h20Z » •.««.»»•.»•. *OhLUC i-i H «LUO H— - I

vOvO^OOvO^t-i MLU-* xO>O^OsO^O^OO^O O 2TI—K hh LUCOLU |— I— vOZT^O sO I—w He-»-(LU II 3)h U! II H- h-LUI-i-t LU 3) LU ZTww—^—o ZhwDs-wwwww w Oo:CDO »-..-..-«3 q_ a-:O 25wO«— 3)w i-h

"ooll oq:hz — ao2ozofvjcs:(NQ:zo30z 02: q£LULULULUujUJHhh U2h >-iLULULULULULULULUHLU|~ t-n c\|^ 3:^2 »-• *-hLU«-»LU hh uj q_

l-HI-l-H-H- I— I—I— l—l— I— »— I—I——l-Z:— I- I—— h-t-COI-h-H-t—1»—ihhhh>_ii—i 2hhmhhhmh<hD 2! ZT 2T>—"Of—«2Tt—i OoilxarcCtrQCO Oa:u:a:G:oc:a-a.a-OLrOu_ OO CU- oazaOa. Z2J35220 U3333S222H20H OO (_)•-< U3<3U3 LU

* * # #

o o o o o oI*- 00 CT> O <H CM-H H —t CNJ CM c\|

101

oooo

Page 109: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

oo2"

O

oo2To

<>a:UJ1/3

CDO

I

h-OUJa:

>

oo3-5

<i

UJH-3a.2:ao

UJooCCUl><a:

zUJa.

o

zo

2: 3x oi- -j»—• <tat: ooo UJ_l X< I-

a:oom

>- —

.

s:2: OO3 .—1

Q 2T•» 3

-H O"" >

5: Ooo 2! M~* 3 <-»

o 2: Q •»

m = •fc QO0(N Q h- Or-<

•• 3 >2IC 2: 21 -3h- ~* •—

<

QDa: 2r—-» rvl O »'*» '•*

oo 3 < —»—» XSOnO QOI »QQ •hqs:— m •••H^H zoo 1 11 1 NShH-*z otts: <X> >32rr:

i-i < -•33 h- » ••— TODDC£ 2ZOQ OO 1 1 21 -QO—O 1 3 •—

1

X> DOv0 Qww Q-^CM<<—

1

rsjQ-H—-^o oo*»i— \- - ->>-i— i—>> -sl21 ZIZ:3 3Hh-h-oo-^Q2:2:_J_J2:2:-i3|-h-oO3 <<2: 2:32rz:r^ o2:2:ujuj2:2:>-ozz-iZ D i-h hj;hm5;h>DDQDD3Z »»-ii-i2:•» »— + «M nmQQJ -OQ OQ2TOQC-3O Z »-< <M»-it-iQ^Q + + DNhwQO 3o£_J < O II II II II Q<rn—— Oh t

|| || || || || |~x X> II II II

2! OU. «— 00 ~»—•QCl—•—»—*- ^c\|3t\i<M "NI-I- — «-.^—.*-._ 2:5: ^—.o>>Z HOD OO Q hi »-i33 —*»-i<. 00 NSZ—«— 2:2; h2>-*»-(m o O0O0 ZShihm<I2:«— —I II II h-ihhUJ Q II >—— w.^<CJ 33qqcnj nnd^o: x 11 11 1—oc— <——' 11 co

a;HHi_(rvl»-iH-«Z O ZOX> DOOUooota:< 3 H-tct: os:oo< <<x>hhi-i a2"ooa£ 11 11

2:00 21— »—M_|pNjfs4lsjJ-—1»— I— QQoiCr:_J_li^ifvlrNlH-t UJqujz 11 Om z<j<«wjjjj:5:oojj«<lloqdO -4"ivlu_ 00<U_U.LL»-<<UJUj33UJZ<<CQCQcDivl00Z

II II c£Csi<.t-* OOOOOOOOOOoOoOOOOOOOO<X>-»-h

00oa.

o

<00

Ul00

arUJ><

U_ooUJ

3o_J<oUJ

a:Cl

LLo

UJQ

oCM

D000coo

(

oUJ•UJUJl-H-O

I— »-H»-)v0

a.<xa:r\i

c_JOOU_<OONOOXXQ o

oa: u_ o

o

00000000

o o

00000

102

Page 110: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

•» l-H —K««•» OC 021— O 1-3•_» UJ 58Q1—

t

• O—oc —

.

COOl-H .—

M

z —

»

o<O l-H CO

•••» •—• l-H a:oCM .—»I-H a: Ow ITiw z-*Q «•» »oo z 00MH 1—

1

HN »-a: •»»

II <C •» —

z

o to i-HCC «-» m3IU N4 *o in •0•> < •> •» •» ^0

••*, u_ ii-

_ 1. —1 11—

<NI -h»-h II «-» nr *-•

_« •> ^«~ HM ^Pvl \s\

O «••• -2: ^w »< •» —

»

»-• t-t mi^i OO -^CD » 00 1-1

GC •—» «-< —»M -HO <-* II 00O 5: UJCQ ~l< ^ - OO 2!-h -H

z M 3:0 icCOD •—-» —

^

3^ ST•k < o< O OO O 2: O » —O

—» UL r^z-. »—« •» hh CM Z) •.—

»

Oin O CM I—1-4 w—«• ZZ m 2:^ <« • u>w U)«-H Z>Z3 •» 2:^ f-2"—1—^ «-» O^O 2--» OO O 2: UJ Z-H

ii 1—

1

H- »M o<s: 00 ~»h- -H H->t 32Z-* —

»

m< o<zn »^<_> 21 ^•^ ODG?*: O O^CO cMo:< ujo HOa: 3 OUJ OO—»-H•» MOO O h-eo SIM zoo O 2:2: 2I2'

«-» <co *—» •» 0—0 « z> •• UJ< —OOO•^ ii_r\l— •* J- •» * 2C0 0-»ro O »-z hQq^ O^ in—

»

a:o z -H -1— J- 2:•» »OON •» O^fH Oh- O DC<. 2_ -»—.LOOO <0' '—

CM mf-H-om O «- -H—»^> r— O ^:~->i- 00w ±£ Z-h*: —O m -^r ro n0 1 003: » -m i-h-J -tritrtn. UJ ••OO - •» —. M in » om »^^-H^inNNlLtHQcDiH

21 >*oo>o— o< D^m ozzw w2z^^«on«s:< •St. O l-H or^-co H ^ H<« <oo U_ <ODD

«^"^ z W 1-00 —*. *"> -J JQQ""

1

i-h-^u_ Ol-Q —

*

• O Z-< •" O -^ 0+ «M rv| O l-H—_oo 00 1- —ILUUJi-h D ->1- OOO O H < <—«-OO00 i-hO —f~o — z ZV-CC OsO^ r-»- a:_i (Mro<r 11 r^j i—t—^(M 3 CM • •mOUJ c_> -»oz —•»-• • II —t-Hcsjog-J <r<—zzoo

CMQ o:ujo — in r^3 u_ ZZHHNl -» U_ l->t-HCD•• •• O -HUJM2UZ • i^ -H "C r^(VJt/)t/) -HOOi-hi-h •• —<£ »-hoooo<i:^OsO OOOOO » r-4 » • h OUJ •• •OO <« 2TOOs0<5 hOSmmD

cOn^ionO-hi-i O ~ £u.UJ| • »— • _J_JUi +QHM || O—*«— OOOOcnj + H 1 »»-h»-hlu UJ'.'O O II rsiMZ3 (X * "mi' — 11 a. 11 11 11

—t.—1 —<—<-—1 II wq_u- u3 1 CtwJ Z "H UJ <t<lZMMO II II •-• OUilXJ t-t UZ'M2DZ «a!a: • 00 i-h UlUJivlOrvl 02:00hh >0v0>0 v-0>0»-l UJ — 1 l-H HO <w 1- II 11 jorh i-<ruj<_i—»^-h

LU»-h»-hUJ II 11t-— K«— t— UJt— hhUJ UJ»-_J Z _i 2: 2: i-t i-h u_ a: Ot -JMMM

Da'tfD l-H Z ZDatiO-oaNu. Ovtm<ujujQ;a:*-'Q_0<<< <*

Z23Z o^au. OU. OZQ2 -OZO<i-h Uiii^OI-H33D3uOUJllJUJt-H 1—

t

UJUJUJUJLUr0^^2»-H Oll-H O »—

1

l-H

y- i-H-h-h-Ki- H— 1-^-z z > 1 II '1 !> I»-H Z zo 0^:0:0.0:0.0 QLL ou.U 033323Q o«-« 0»"H

# •* * *

o o oc 1 OOm ^o r-oc 1 a>o <-t CMCM cm CMC\ 1

(Nff) m ro

103

Page 111: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

coi—

»

2:3O

OOrg

a: a:*

I I

mmDQZQZ »-h,

3<o:33iQQ

CCCCOOUJZ

002:aa:

o

1 1

tocotococo^x>

033—— COCO

H-h- II IIZZW»—•»-( co —»—

»

OD<•-'-«0<"\jm

II ll II-"*-

QZWQQ(NjrgtNUJLUMMtvlDiCi:<<<o-o_UJLLIUJ22

O tocoUJ —lC\l

cc ivirvj

a. <<r2— lULl!

+ - -CM OO SI 3!J}. -i_<C\|* QMM~U_<<<\J.-tUJUJ^O •.</)O OQCOt-tUJV.'HfM»-iQc£ rvjMOLLO:Q.oo<<Oi-«a:2»-Hijjuj>— QUJQ

I— 00000 I

a:'-»^mvor"-coO (\J<N|f\J(M(NIOC0I—-H—If-tHHhDZ •• •> » •• «2:

no o00-"

11 uju : ujujuj 11

O h-l-H-J-l-U-QCt—«»—*> II i»—<Q.>-«o;o:ct:o:o:a:ooQlLi22223<

OOXH-U'2!

CO2:O

<>uucoCOc

oUJa:•—

1

o2:

co

o

w'—

'

to300 -5

t—It-H

a:a: <r O00 1-ZUJ 2:

O-OO 1- 3co O< II II O•*——» co +

-^ _j•—• t—

1

<<oII UJ l-l-l-V— 3 2:2:2M UJ H-

1

333>xo H- DUOOZUJZ 3 UOUrncoto»-t Om<<H- CtL II II II

Z COa 3 H-<0

to

_J_J<

ZZrZ

COm.

Cm1-2!t0 2T» •>

o<Zh<_J•>LL!

OO—« »0<2TOl-uu •>

2:DZCC2I022TH-«2!^com *

<2TCD

i-H »<M2!rvl CC<

-a(NOQ-t-Zco-»

o-2:<Z20« •>•—

OJ03CO0-2:0- -

co<

in

—4II

r-t

UJ2.<a:

o<oCO

tt<0>—«^-——»-»—«a. 1 om —-*-.mzh » co •-'rn^ZXOOOOOOO< CO— 000+ 1— »-«ujo0> O'0'-^-*r\| •• -»-^2: 0<Nm2: o: coor\jmvor*-mm^ •*— oss

(\|C\I— a.<t^-H^^'H'H-H (nj + vQ 1—t^^HH--H- »*»»*•.«. || # »-^ •O- -fr CCO >- vO •O -O ^0 ^O n0 O t-**-* hh v0vO>0

0-CO<Nh-02: M UJwujCO<tO_C)»—CJ—"—^^^^-*- II II f_X-J^-^-~»<l 2:_IC0< O e-iliJZ

11 - ^jjuJUJLUUJUJUJ>j-vj-ir>arcot-<UJU)LUII II _JH-Oh-h-»-h-(-»-»-r0^iii3<:H-|-l-l-

o.o-»-t<»-i^:a:arct:a:a'a:Q:c 00:0:0:ZZZU022223222Q U222

«•*

Om

00000

104

Page 112: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

(\j •• -»

c

>^LU —

«

» • »—

«

V-(Si 2: h UJ t^h- M- 'Vm t-i X Zm K- *V13 cc rH z ow » •

r-* LL *» < »-iO # m

3U 'V fO H 1- Q- * •{}

~.ZO » H-

1

(/) HH T» *—• 1 X •» »—

4

O0Z •M- •«•

^rviO <kt X O 00 M- •»

^<- •k -H —

»

Q.1-1 # *-^ •. • •> •• H- * tr

OO -OX O (NJ X • Z< «• K-

r* • • 1—i"i" z *^l—

1

• Oh- ){ •M-

2: 00-M- cc - - • •« 2: K^t/) •« *O z#o- »• *v» m »- K- »o C# O X "A • p* <U! * •?(•

t-^-Vr y- ro - 1 X H-00 •«• «•

-» + r-# •» • h- r«- <s>cc » •H-

-Hr IX • </)- OO • Hi •» »t/>0 C/)# r-O O •» m » UJ> •« *r-(Q O* =>of. Z CM 9" U) — iy>< »• «SO CL-M- 2:u_ 9*—1 X oi ex: a: •il-

«3 • 1/3 #'~. «• 21 00 UJ m LL't— •« *QO 2J z*m X X --^ •* h- • > M- «»n0 O o*<o in • <N a UJ CO <o fr *

2I-M- t—

1

-1#- -Z. ro O "^UJ 2: u_ OttUJ « «•

hS h- J—-* •.»-• •> . LO »_j • •k y-m * M-

s:^ _ < <« XI- * •• t - •k X » Sr

02: > h-« >0l/> 00 Xc\l — z X -H Z_J if •>>

DD vl" CC to* < 2* >t-" <r 1—

)

•k UJO » SrQ *. UJ #• UJ O ^u_ "^o- rH in Q. M- *Q •» 1/) _1#0Q K-t • •* —.»^»-H » •k • Oll « *r-l + --*! H CO <«• UlO H - X o:x • co O •«• •M-

2! > H--H- 1— •—

«

-I OOfNJ - - oco • LL u_ «• •M-

002! •«•1 Z* <G- h- CC - <•!« 00 • 00 # .*

QQS h- o#zo </) ujir> »-•«• - * X UJ * »*

-03 2: O r«sl*»-< h- • <* - 00 •» r^ Z|— ?{• *-. «o > UJ i-i-M-O u_ UJ>t o* -z? X k*.-^ o<r if- #mO •» •» on a:-* cctS) O 2:-! •M- XO CT^ r\l l-H—l •« *•Oh t—

1

•—

<

o# OZ - U- Q-M-O^t-i HHin 1-0 »• *•H-O I*QM UJ • *>- UJ* -^1— •» •• • <u « *-*ro— —

»

z # 01 2: XX >«< m xco _i_i •«• *z# h* z* r- < CO CO a:*- 1- • HU. o< * #>oo O 1 3* oar •£. » •. UJ* QfcO V7 •» Kk 00 »* *

^-4- —» *o > a#»-«o m - * 00-M- UJ -»mx _JIU M- *<-"2:r*- O r- CD ZttU-Z •« i>0< CD* >U- HH-^ <a: * *Z O^ OZil-Ht-H 1 *i#o X a;ir\ o#a:o •v. » «--OCL * *M/)C * in * «* r- - - ro UJ » - - LU 2: Xm * m « •Sr

—•2: >o r«-^ + ^3 i/> » »2:»-i * H-X •• »»</>UJ «Ct~4 »^v * M- «11

.—

»

-^ 3 XXi-a: - UJ—

1

XXC02: •< »<} XX fr -»

11 a: —

11 <— ~3 mrooo O X •» -tHO< Qin^r-t-j-i^-Ln •« »<

O-H ;Z Q -»<\icm» - Z - <\| roro- Z m •><u-<:^.-h » *»-i V-ii ;n 1 —

<

UJUJ < « •> •• » ••H-t * ••• ~« »»xirt *m •• •*> *»

-JXr-Z) ••»» II r--ZJ 1- ^ XX « X •—.v. x •• x>r »x •N.S X X

0-J2Z»-.2 mZ ^h uu P-fN* r-)CO X tNX ^. O^X^^ -XCNJX^^ in r-in<Ocr:»-<ujO>l-a:«-' •» r- • *v mcM -H-^rn^H«^«v (m^3 rg v, >^m ^- >».v —

1

r^

mOQ2l-l-(<1^2|- vO z> •« •

Z »—

<

ZUJ QlOcxra ODW r •

O U3D OZ O hhhl-h h- H-K-cOK-h-h h-H*-h-HM-M- r- r-»-tUJ O <«<< <-• <<U_<<<<1^<<<<<<<-»<--<1- \~ a. 2:2:2:2:2:--2:X2:2- -2' 2:2:2:

-

2" 2: 2: 2" 2: 2: 2: 2: 2:z •—

t

ex: a: a: a: a: a:\-aLcc-xcccccccc "CCOCcCQCCCoiCCm oi'-k.cc:

OCC Z 1- OOOCQSOtLOCHOOCOXGOOOOGOWCSGU3 UJ (/) U.U-U-LX.U. ILOLLU. *U,U_U-U-inLLLLU-U-U.U.LLZU_*vLL* * * # « #00000 00 OOOO 0000000 O

O OO OHrgm^ LPl vOr- coo^o—

1

rgro-rir\0(^co (T> Oin no ro- 00000 O 00 00—i^ f^ r-4 r-»—1—I—( -

^

•H CMfO coco

UUOUUO U><J>

105

Page 113: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

•fr . y- i-4 ,_ — o x x -•« LU I— oo - t-i O O X•fr ooZ •—• O • —»</* •-•»-)(_)& o_»-i too. q-^:i/>xi-h# ULI O 0- P-U LU 3: x# >O0 Q. Z < •< C£ 3# <Z O O - CQ O H# QCO Z kh _0 U < H-* i— -* o i- ——. >• —in- <r& I— t-t <T U! •-•*/' H- Z# U-0- H- h- ^ -d*- -a. OO O Z# CO < CO - -• <t HH O•M- h- V- —IV. LL _J \— t-H

# p»-c oo uj •• • <r «-=*t m t—« 02 CO - < 21- LU UJ </5 m# h->h- ll! o: zh- hZZI x o </>

* h- CO LU C< 2TCOH K O- O•* <LU CC > mQ tfMM Q.i* _JQC LU < H- -»LUH- \-Q£ CC H-M- Z><-»> CC CLo: H-O-mO C CO \—» C_> < J- OU.IS OCOLL U_ U. O0)* -JLU- 0_ h- -5" O •-' <» <o_#h- o orz* Oorao c ll. _j# OLU» LU Z>LU »o:Z> LU Ui# x -Z oo o aiu-OZi// oo lu uifr OI-XLU O ~>0_l >3Z3 Z> X X* i— coo. _i h-"-<ai o i— I—# »sto o - a: l_.x__z^ to»• 2:00 •» P-O00 mO^< <f 00 00# <Z. LL. LL U_Z<»— LL 3 2 kh ^,K- o_o a o c z ci-o u_* Omm C(\m«mCZ ~z.~z.~z.« OH- »ZT Z t-i hDa: O C 0-»C# Q^mSO O H-OIO. UlO-UJt-i I—i •—• I—•-

«• o.oo<i-. kh aoo>t-os:t- i— i— - h-* Ou_H- I— O GOZ <•-. *-« Hi .(-,,

# <a.e>< < —<o mhZw# o—i —i a: __< oH- irtZa:3 o z>o:i~ i— >o_uia.•* mOQ-O o olu <coujx# — •-•• —I _J >l—LUO I—\—Z•H- 001— -<t < Zod <-? ~S.

# - i-h<XO O O0LU<Qil—LU00O# #XI—* •-> LU< mZ« - i— 00 •»—< (nj luluh-clu ^# — - - - - h-oootz ooh-# X «-•»-« •• •> <<UJULJ(X<<0^m- r*-xx- x x xlux liiwiM

—• •«• » •» »x » •> - Q-- • za. i—»• ».«o- - •>••- «»uj» •-

fN «• ««•*—•«• -»--^X *XX -X *—i—

- - - — —- OOX^^MX'OXo>rx XXX -X- X* »<N • »<N »H

<C\|C\|<0 OOO- O-M-O" V "V X «*S *~*m —'t-Hf-lU-Lni—(—.f^^^^-1^ <-*m —< •> V» *t"V»W«

00-M- 0^ If *X <t *hl-hl— l-« l-hhh<t-»h I- H-I-HHM—JH-H-*mi- -h-' I— I— (— I— I— H-H- 1—«<<•»< *<<<<uj<* < <-<<<<«-«•«. <• <oo<««<<<—.<srs-si^-inT-Ln^srsisr-is:-}*' sr—srooszxsr^rs:?--}*- 3:2: — x .Jzxs-ssxj-sir. sr-^x s-h0:0:0:0: *oc *oculc£cc a:* cc aLaCcccCcccccccc* o:a;xooa:ooa:oo:o£a:a:a:a:a:a- »o:- ^\qcODCOc0O00GOOO>-O*OSCuJCOOGOO#OC'tHOZOHCOOcOOOOI-O »o -OvU-U_U.LL.LLLLLL.LLU LULL CD LL.-H- LL *U_ |— LL LL LL. LL. LL. LL. * LL LL *XLL. OU_HU-LL.U-LL.U_LLLL.LL XU.J— U_ • U. »

ft# •>>• •*! -S- fr "&#-&## -M- "K- * -tt-OOOO O OOOO OOO OOOOOO OO O O OOOOOOOO OOO

~-»(\ifn^- lo vOH-coo> o >h cn m^mo(*-aD a>o —4 og mNtmvOf^-aoc^o h n flrgr\jf\jc\i 04 rNjrsjcMcsj m ro f0 mrorocococo m^ vt >}" >r>f >} >^ «^ >*^ u^ ^ in in

106

«. •» * _» U'm m 00

z•

OSI

• • —

» H- •*

SI _T •—

1

« 00 X• H- « i CO

• m • >—

1

•» •> •_•

•_ » 00— 00 •« X VOsJ (\J CC O «• in • <—•

*—1 t—

t

u<- a. «• _> _S" "v•i *» H- »• * • ••

V • UI z. # O V- in3TO0 >> Z. X •

t • CC >—i M- t—* 0> CTa • LU H- •M- H- *> LL

1- < » 00 • ••

« » muj H- R- < 00 X•» •_ • _r OO * LU CC CSJ

_-• m n >o •«• LU •«

KH »—

«

—i» LL! * O H- in"V •• #• LL OO •»• (—

«

LU •

ta m •i •in CC # a: 2: CM—.LH —

• • LU * O -Ht 11 II 0-•> * • 9* u_

voo M11 —

<t # _ X •-

«u_ * 00 u-tMo: * X O XLO _. X __: •.--II— » >t -h rsi

•X OD • t-< » •* pi •«

fM-M i 1—

1

•0 •»• m « in—t •> m H- II

• LU » • OO •

LL<M Q- < _ •

'

.00 •»• O z•-t-H O H- »hO * H- LLX - 0- 00 X -J # 00 1—

1

•(MX a: uirn O •»-,m H- X•—( LU a: 0—1 11

«• •» < CNIm LU _z - LL * X H- •»

•m X a. <- - O * *s.m 00 in^H-l H- \-cc -»-?;-_ •

-w •> Z) CC OOOX2T- •« - • U 4"

U.X 2! O MC.C0CH* «•<_> O —

i

»-H t-H a: qc_hmz# * z: LL

X »-— rvl cc Ui "H-LU-8- « t—

«

LU •»

moj < LU O - <2!-* « X 2! X•f-1>V »-tLU>-JH-«- •» H- < CO

>* - »_- X arooooo* •«• 0: z •".

<• <J-< H- OZ<OD# * O m <rmA<H- Z) <o:_j-3-«- -a- 2T •K <* 1 mo _E JHD<Q## X mX H- -( <woo<* »• m_-» *•

-*- X- M |-hU> - * »—

»

•_ X•» _»f-_l *. < oo< «h>o «• a: . >v--i

- <N X -> j—> _• • XLUX-M- O ov *>-H»-H(\lrg * •• _-^-m__: _—1

-**> « jjy> OvJ

«. •»»—I -v_-X-» XX *< # •» • _ > t-i-X •»"V CNI - rgrg^O * > _i • •»

xr-xv»- •VO •«• 00 X2IX.<\iriHs V. W^.V.00 » CM —1. ,

—'1

t •1 M- •»

00 OOOOO t

OuiOOa. 0->CLUI

0: >z zluzq:-2 2002UJ

OcDOoOz ZOZCQid __: __o

000^ oo<oooot-H •—

»3:»—<<j

X X 13H- H-LUH-m - —1- U.)*• -O »_JX xzxo<N (NI<T(NZ1—

1

-H —»<I•» •z *

>v V<v.z<

-_• •_- ••>-»'»

X *H- H-CMH-X< <-H<f\J

Page 114: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

CO z •« x & »-> H t—•«—

1

HH 1- c - •n - scc <t • m (SJ M h- *-t CO h" H H-l ^^ m • -J *• »UJ o * 1—i * *—* tr *-CC h co H % *—

»

• • m LU

h- Ol- CO •• S CO C OLU CO < « co in CCUJ LUCO CC V. %* O a. <h- O 0-» t- Z - —

<

UJ <2T > LU •• •• a. CQ2 O- • CO C^- 1- LL 0:

a:u- h • » z LU z- 1—

1

0- c < covO UJ—

1

UJ 0- c* z 2:- z a LU K- z - \- LU

O (AC 2: • 3 -» O 2 "-"(M X—M <DZ COf\J CD? co CO 1- arx O H-»-i h- t>o MO<t u» "5*

in c< >* U. LU z < u-^ z < •» . c H»-H< • co -J <CO x UJ _l *: h- (M ^ h-- zoa mi- in <r—» 1—

1

h- •»

• LULU ** 1- co LU »• co UiO CO*-* » z —COin x >d- UJ—

2

1— CO*v 1- s» LUOZ Ol^X I— < t—

<

sin ha: 21 < CO U.) t-o^ CO LU 3<NIO O-COJ 2: x so •*

in • • cc CO 3 * a: coz h- it\m *^. Q.I—

»

CO •» VU_LL 0> zolu t—i O- Xi- m q:c L'-'OH- CO » Q^O l-H LU - CO

c\j 0- r- hO> LL LU O • LL LU"-' co »<r V^H-ll^S LLO LU 1- COLU CCf*- - CNJ occ > OCO —>H- CM- SIM » m 3 co 01- LU

ZX •» Z-hUJ LJJ < -J LU <!»-< ujonco l-X- 10^ X) Zco Kon CO DhW X CC U-i X- QCCO orn - (-2! HCN K -5 OD LU»$ l-li—

1

HHOCO h- t- —4 H- tH-O Z LU OK- C 3Cn i-h 0-5 2:

l- • 1- »o LU • iH Q. <oico OcJl— Ct s:h z < LUOO <s <o h- \- _l—> Z Z i-luoe: X <LL HH • 3 co< V

Z •-• - H^ X < < Oh UJ3fclLiZ COHUl h-O rxJO> LL kt-H >• z >cco z. LU U-lO hZ> UJZOX <rn ll LL,

I LUC~ *—

1

LULU> LU LU <I . 2Z3»-h qlu< ShZI- -» - c —1

(_ Q 1— Oh- -J -J 2: hChh - CC IM3 CO •» •

CC CO CO ZO O O Q LUwL< Q !- COt—H-2*

t-1C£—Z —T OCOO DO < Cjlu»-< Z z. LU<N coi—coi— —*x Zor:co»- 0CU!SO hZ —1

z ccz UJ CC O < < >rn HH CO orou- CO<ivi 01— «*-l »—

1

•c LL

—<o <•• a: LUcOUJ OoviO MZUI< Z- H- H- r— •—

1

•»

a 00 D 00 O Q UJ • ooolu •i h- 2:lu«^)< < HK- «1-1- ZLU--»t—

1

Z</)Z UJ LU COQ ZQ-ZCO LUV.UJ <oOo h- LUi-i (—1 LL<cco<co cc <cCO > > CO < <icC IM >t—II IH 1 r>..i-> > •»—

1

II

OOK . o-—»— lAJ>-< ££ a: oo> i— zi— uj 1— ••< a:ct:of:oi <UJ LU - >OcOZ cOH-h- LU LU sO C0OC0> - Z UJOOO • • iZQ LU »

t» \0 hQh» LU»—

<

CO CO • •»H H-tl II l<J •• • CO C0»-1 II«

Oai O <dlu2:co CO co qi-qq: COLD 002:2:2: LU OO iMujcsixzoujox o-»o O ujco < 1- uiarx OhHI- -JCTSCCCC Q. - l-H

-Jini— oa>—1 01— -ho. it—

QhQ —JLUK- 33D a. »o< < -CC •k

O-00 >-< • o_«d- -« .• UJ UJ o_- *-*cO»—'Q o_i- 1— 2:o>oo (\l<t •3: »coi—ro5lOcoO>(MX X 2: * ct: ccz. 2ZLUC0 OCOI^LO <(\IOZ z mQ<mt-i< <>ti-i «zm(- H <x OUJO<f <z:*- UJ»—ii 11 1 X < < -z %xm 1—ccx^- < X<f CO . X CC LU •Ol— 1- - <ujinh-ooujujoh- 11 sooc a: LUCM 0:0:0: •• LUCvJI— Mhhh 2: >->CO CO h- LU

csi< > •< h-UJ LU •% UJUILLIX m< o<t<< a: ct: *cocct»-xcozcco>x «s J— h- a:s t->l-(N cnox zxxx oo^olu UJ z002mUJ0N20Ch2 Z Z<ZH O «2 HJ32 U.H x X LULU <ll>*-- X u_(si- k-Xouj LU LL- LUCtTLU •» u_o» • * • - 2:1- 1— _JX »-

-t_,>•- <X) -CO- • « •— I— m I-- V. . 0^ >»»•>•> «H-- m OK co»a£x —

<

OX -cc - *• -X-~ •>» •> •> mx COXXX XDD - •k z- 1—1

XLU(NIH- • XvOCNJ XUJX X-• xo X -X- X- <N - (\j<\InO (SI - X X < -C\J>— H<COCSI —!LLt(\|l— <N • Ot-». rsjxrg • rg •—

H

•.^H^H^

4

_|Q> *.,—

1

r-

1

- X mhz -- o<-»cc -_jh2;h 1—1» «—(COO^fNJi—<» HX •" X •> •• •• -mx •» •» -M —-UJS »Z -|JJSQ. »>UJ - * » »UJO *»H • * •OS rr»>sS^ SH(NJ>^ s X * X

•v.- sxovt-srs "V *s»t\i'^a:o ,,v •»*vc\i SIMS tsisss S vtS s —IS —1* <NO :z < uj •-• 0>H S M *k *- CO

wX-HLU-lJ>~X—CO- »- ».*-«U_fH** •»—' • —*Vfc'^* ^0—— «-»•— >—.(—•»-— •» «l >»' ^^

<o -CO LL) < ' 1—( - •» « •|-<\|»-S K -f- 1— LUI

-1- HDHhQI- H- h- • H-h-h-l- t- -H-K H h-H h-< -< -ct*<x<cc<_j< <=«:<»—(M<2<% <co<« , <<<<--<x<<t < << <rss» •2: 05: 02: 0.2:.. 2! 2! m2:<2: 2:^2: -2:5-2:2" 2:02:2: 2: 2:2: 2:cc -ccujmcccsiccu_cc«• CC •a::za:i- •a: orz cc cccvcccccccc*tcccvcccc CC ccar-<ccO- O-J -O- C CZOOOIO>CZOO'>OV,OmOGOO<C qc--0-•»ocso zu_ •u-onu.su. LLXLLQU.mU.OOU-OU.M U-ZLL -U_ UL LL LL in U-S U_ U- LL LLLL -LL LU# #* •*-frtt#*#*-i>**** # # # * *O O 0000 00 00

>r in O p- co CT* h rg m >t m sor-^o^ O —i(N m >t^nin in m in m m >o vO >o >o >o >0 sOsO^O-O 1*- r^i^- r- f*-r*

l-l

w-> 00

107

Page 115: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

do uoouuoaaaacL»»»»»»»»»>»»»uoo<\-^ O O Q. > z00 *£ O O O- > ~^3 O O O. X >C3 O Q. t—t > zZ»-< O D. a: > <<Z O Q- z i- > •»

•Z O Q- <r z > 00o ~ O > Q. h~ z a: > —

^

~<r O CO Q. 1- O > yCCK O 0- < LL UL > Z3o_j O UJ Q. 1- O >UJUJ O 00 a. 0^ X > t»Q O Oi o_ z •—

<

> zQ - O UJ CL 00 UJ O CC > -He-t 5: O > Q. Z 00 OO 1— 1- > ^r

QLH- O < O- O OH UJ h <r > —

>

O O oc 0- >-> OOUJ <t z > Ozz O l- a. 1- UJ> 00 ^_ > •-z O o. < o< UJ < hXZ > asr O O a. Z3 0030L —1 K JMM > .—

»

roz O UJ 0. OUJ<h- 00 o-a: > zrvlS O 000 a. UJ_j|- z 1—

1

MhH > 3<u- O OO a. OOOUJ < Q xi~<r) > D-z O _iX Q. ZZMh HJJQ. > fr

-HC0 O 01- q. C<Q< Q 0:3 H > ^t\J - O 111 0. l-i •—

1

UJ UJ i-zu-zj > >tNh O u_z a. t-OQQ > a: < 00 > w<tz O a a. <ujujuj OO ac Z5 Zu« > OCO O 00 0. »oct: UJ UJ OO IZIU > —

<

(-H O h-Z 0. or;a:_DQi H- 00 < CChCI > a:zz O zo Q. UJUJoouj < CD UJ M|- > 00CD O t HIM 0. oooo<i— Z O 2: ujujoo > z UJ

<\J O Z ZH Q. CQCQUJZ •-H K l-QLl- > **

o.z O \— H-< 0. OOSm X LL u_ Z)rDUiz > 1—

<

-^

Zlt O cc 00> o_ t-xa: O 0-Q_>l-l > h- «*•> O 3c*: a. 00 U_U.U-U_ Z5H-0 Z2T2cx: > < ««i

Q-O O CC -)UJ a. ^ cooa 2:30 ZOOZ OOMQ. > a: QZQ O h- OOO Q. O »-)2:o OLUO 00 > <i t—t

H- O g <C0 O- 1—

1

occcccce rvlH-i »—>o»—

1

ceo: > _i a.ClOO O < 0. H UJUJ UJUJ <MDoOH- Zh- 0000 > O2 O X^ a. •—

<

OD CD CO CD <tujuj<K<r »-»-U-LL > UJ Zz O oao Hl- a. Z 2:2:2:2: _l X_J»-ih-»-i X > a •*

^H <s O Z0> O a. t—

1

DDDD <OHH J>oo> »—

t

UJUJUJUJ > -H< z - O 3-1 UJUJ Q. u_ zzzz i-iUJU-ZUJ'-'UJ CC zzzz > Ul >2 O < -Z.CC Q. LL! 1—OO <IDQQ HX MMMM •> _j Z> H-D-— O •» % II 1 Q. a -J-l-J-J MO II

<»-' Xh-h-H-l-- > CO z»-l z <=> O ZiH h-O a ««ZZJ aoooxSa:"-ODDD > < 3LL OZ O <-* DZ a. ai hHhl-OHO'' jja:uja:»-' ha:ccOQ > ^( QK «~|-< O 21 Om a. _j OOOOm NJ-Xoc:<fcr:K-<l— cLaiaicC > c«f< zh- O <l- a: a. co l-l-t-hh-QQ- 3CODOI—X 2:< CO CD CO CO > < Z3 qCmoo O oo co CD 0. < »-"UJUJQUJZ00Z<O SDDDD > >

i-a: O 3 3 c l-H UJUJUjUJoOXXi-i-0«<Sm< O0O0O0O0 > »—

i

00 coo. 2: O .O 00 0. a: xxxx t-it-H a: co t— ujj— LU X > 00-J -j > O >-r> 0. <i »— 1— h-H-Q-LUU_OOo02:oocujE 1 <<« .> 1—

1

Q O _j< < a. > UJ II > OUIQO O a. II II II II II II II II II II II II —-» II II II II > UJZH-UJ O •• tt O 00 a. h -»(\ICNJ > CC•—IO0O0 O O »—

1

a. _

.

—>.-»—

.

l—o. a. > 0.h- »< O QiUJ O a. «* -»<oo zzz >3»- O Ol- O 00 Q. •Bl

S*222 "". •> «— U.LL > UJO00O O x< O \—< Q. 0.^•w«.——(-(-!-< U.r\IZ > —1oc»-t~ O »-n O X O. -^^-1'-<hQZZZhXJ>U > COC0QO0 O 3 O H- D_ CNlroocOQoOQ'-.>_«"w>—ILLOZZS > 33 < O < O a. H<oa ivl rvlOZ H- kh »—Z 2: 2: U.' Qi 2: t-iOO > OO0< •» O O a. zzzz «Z<oOQoOU_3cDQH>_J_0 > a

h- # # O O Q- >o O O O, >UJ O O a. >-3 O O LL ;>LU O a. ;>

*»oo<~> 0000000uoouuuuuGOOOUOUU00OOOOOOUOOO^UOOU

1 08

Page 116: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

CvJ-'v*-

o.<roZHN_l<

1— UJZQ-i— t»(\J

2T-.MCOC\l<o. --»zo1 2! *m.

zrsrow»_z CM

2: - * #U-—»Cs| M-

C\|>—cls: •pw

azs: «*

Z -3 "V CMwojq CN>oa • a >z UJU«Z-» S-2T —

»

UO^-O • lO 2!3 2T<sz UJ no < (\J

•Zw •^ _l O h- # —— -a •MM c/5 •»

0_—

O

2: z rH 1—

-H •—

ZhH 3 < >z. O >—2:00 Z 2Zt- 2: 0—O •» :«i

•» 2:00 O 2: >oZf\l— O >v UJ DO UJ Z)OOQ-< UJ O > O > O 00<Z2 X a ^ GC »w a: K-h-»»ww UJ 0— UJ «^ (/)

-.2T< » HO CO 2: t/> Oh20 2 O co 3^. co ^ CO II

zi-h- Q. OO ~*z O —

»

—SOO » 1- t O O —

^

OaQ •. Q -^ pH UJ MOD LU H-lQQ *— h- OO X 2:0 X O -3-5

| .M Z QO II h- wD • 1- «_• • 1-WKZ —1 O Zh —4 Z •*-•z— a: • _««-« H LL <l U_ O «UJ— -o Q. O O <o— II O O II H-•z-h-OJ*H » * -3-5 O zt- z »- Z • UJza^ a: 1- II CD z •*/)ct:-» z ^ »-it/)—» »

II 2ZZ)Z2 UJ ^ X z • »-• -^ t/) l-H —

t

h2Z1 - »—

1

-* •-H —UJ « 1—

t

II2!»-« t-H + 11-5 "5 >-«UJ

Zl • »- 0: l-H Z— t- II O 1- II II — t-ZDw2I(\|0 fH i/> H- Z -J . UJ .-h < ^O— < <-MW ZZSIcDClZ * UJ < II 213 t-H l-H> UJ »—

1

1

Z> UJhhOLL o»-«.S -Z«I •* (- Z -• i-«»-«3:z » > ZJOD > JOD r-i-H c_>»—eg H- -3 •> -5 1—1 UJ Q» UJ 2Z-JQZ IU II IOZ z

-»»— (\JO0 •» V. K- II ww H-Z5 UJ OD<Hh DhHOO OQl/)Q. t—t X zz • >1-OO00»— in -so001—cooZUJZ— ^ O hOEU. Om UJ a z Z-1 H- CC —

«

>f>0 »—

1

(NJ3I-I UKD2 a: cc OOh- »-'Z UJ *: t—» UJ JSPza < < OOco-^s: » 11 11 3 00 O 1—

»-<t—z-^ UJ < 11 rOO O^ z zQtO *— H- K >}-in h- z < <uj— 2: z < uan UJ O OIL h- H-—h-<N> —

«

a zzz <S) O UH t/5 t/>•**#•*

OOO O 00-Hf\im ^ in >or-000 uuo ouu 00000

109

Page 117: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

O X XZ t-4 t—

4

00 a: CC<Q.zt-001—

OCD

Z<O X

STCD

UPO0<t

Z00<

X1—4

CCy~<r2;

LU1—4

(NJ

a.z2:2

<2

»<•

X4—1

a:H<t2:

CCUJ4—4

rsi

0.

<~

•«

2Z

<2:

CC

»

X4—4

CC

<2:

»

»—i 4—4 O \~ H h- •» HX 0C" a: 4—4 X 21 X t- X

in 4—

1

O H Qi X CO O jg* Oa. u- LU < O 4—4 »—4 •» l-H •« 1—4

Z h- •» 2. LU CL LU h- LU CNJ \u•» < O m h- 2 z 2 a. 3

h- ST »—

1

< < •» zz or •—

21 # (Nl * •» «•» CD O Z ar Q. <N

1- *L c < UJ Z LU a. LU2: Z *• 1—

I

z 00 •> C^ r* OO•> O 1- »-" • LL —

»

h- •» Oh- e-l z < (NJ O Q. Z 0- h- 0.

X Z K *• t- a. -3 O0 •* 00 z 001—

t

k < 3 2T LU •» z •^ z zQ£ 3: H z O. •» O0 4—4 < z < CN <1- o 2 => •» S: Q. O a: •» CC Q- c£< a •» a. < O Z o_ «_» 1— (M H- Z 1-2: -^ *^ 2: z O •» 00 Q. •a

o • a z 2: X 2T X 2! XH o Z >t cC z < co —4 •> t—

4

co t—

1

X i— •k m a *» cc a: 2! Ct! •h CCo • cc m LL < l- OJ II H- 2 1- *T \-4—4 o • < z a. < « < 2 <LU O o LL •» 2! •» uu z—

.

2! H- 2 1- 23 —»«•». 1 »-» —4 < h- X •» 2: 2!

-^ a: S OJ LL 2! H- 1- ^H»-* < CD < CD <u_ oo- o LL (VI LU Z •*

o oo-< ooo^o a:1-

< OO

""" LLO ~-<

11-? LL

O*"' LL

O** LL

Oi— *<—l'-4 -H .—

:

w 21 "0—

.

LU UL LL_j or »2: - LU LU < Z II Z) z LL J* LL zz> LUOnOLLO + o z SI- z LL O Ohz _J 5 _l

LLI 00 t 2 4-H LL 4—4 LU 4—1 t—

4

og2l»-<LU »—

1

3 »—i O (—4

Zi LU "-W^ <-i II 1- az H a »- ^HCUI— Z3 H 2. h- 2 1—

z cC CJ -3 Sti 3 l-U- 3 <_> < O zz < > <. > <4—1 (—LULU HI ^ c ** O _l mo CD*-* 1- 1- t-1- LU ZH-I-_J»- II o a. JO cC _i 3 -to OK =5 J 3 -J 3ZtU X 4—4 4-Ht—4_j4—tLU LU LU CD -JLU CD —i O z Q. J D. _J O.ox> t- cCcCcCttcCD DhI 3 <oo 3 < _l 2! < 2: < 2:

uz 0.3202Z 2iio 00 o< 00 < O O O O a4—

t

H •—

i

1—

4

O O Oh- *c m 1- y- _J _lz 1—

1

z z _l -J LU LU LU LUa Cu LL a < < X X X Xu a. •—»

o

O»•

O H-

00

h- (- 1-

oo o iH <\iroCO s —* i-H r^f-4

OOO OO UUOU UUO ^>^J^J<J) 0000 0000 000

110

Page 118: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

a:*"• *"* UJ

cc a: •»

u: O <\i

i

1— a.• 2

<\l UJ »D. > <x2 h-a» 2 _)

2! c -»UJ1- t—

t

O•» h- ct »

K O Lursj

2 1X1 -•O-•ft aL ».-T»

CVJ ce. -Cl r-KM

z i^D-•a 32H UJ •• ••

2 X —1—

1

•« h- 22i- •* •*

2 w H-»(N•» 2:0.

c\l X 220. HHj •ft •»

2 a: rsi^m H- Q.O.

2: < 22u. 2: •> »

•ft <N2T2: < CLK3 K- 2h- _J ••h2. Ul 2:2:CD a 22*• LL «-"*

LL UL LL-

LL 2 Cs!U__l >_l3 »—

t

2132- I- H2;> < _l>

1

o _J_J_l —I_l

< _i «O <

uUJX

ou

eu.—-

»

00<r

h<\i

+ + ——

. in ~» in -f\jf\| Q. «•» LO Q-— in z m o. 2 11

*•# —

a. •> a. in z »inzh-20- .. ^ uj—

ma -2 » 2 r\i 2Q. 2 I— ~C\| - O-hh Z •• 2 <M Q- .-1 2 r\J •

|| * Csl »D-22 •• Q.(-t»-H H a. C\| Z •> »f\l2 •«22CL •• C\| CM O.—

•> •> 2 CM O- O- 2 PsJ -.H-H-0-Z2-0. ^ww 22 {N2»*fM2 —•-•.Q_».r\jr\jo_» is<< l-(-22:Ci.CL2< 2i-h- 2r**322*l— 00_j_j •» « t— i—- »»i—»«_j <ruju« 2:2:2:2:2:2:2-01QQ O LL, CO CC CO 2 h- 2Q

OOOOOOOO—— 022222222 ||

00 (_.*.»UJ •-•-« _4....«... Z*3 C^ ........_J ww <J)U^UU<J>l^^l-)< -.^ 1 ^-, 1 -,-. j —~, j „,-, 1 -,-. j -,-. , . 1 ^-, .:> 00 -.arafatraiararcirciercL-

UJ2 00- 00- 00- 00- 00- 00- 00- 00- 002uj oo</) oogm o>3- om o^o or*- oao 00 00 oh •»

I— << OO—'OO—OO—OO"—OO—OO—OO—Oh—'Ohh»-i»< «HH HH HH HH HH _«H _<_| _(_» HH2: a. 11 11 o * »*2: - -2: » »2: •* -2: ~ .-2: »2: *2: -2: - 11

»t-i 2 UIs0-OU-OOu_s0>0U_>0<3U->0Oul-Ov0U_-0v0u_s0^0U_n0OX •—»—. «33S33223: t-iH-l— LUO H ww</>wwl/)ww</)ww00ww</5ww t/';ww</)ww(/~,ww ^23C£ H-it-« Q3r)3Z)Z>Z)Z)r) OwmZa. ii »— uiuj ujuj ujuj ujai ujuj uju.) ujui ujim ujujinocciii-'O- 2»-h _J|— fr— -Jl— t— _JI— I— _JI— I— _J»—H-—II— I— _J»—I— —Jl— H-—"Q-O-J—•< l-l UJ»-««—«I-1_J>-1>-I—J»-H»-l _!»-(•—l_Jt—t»-H_J»-(t—l_J|—)»-«_Jt—II—t_Jl—'t—I 2UJ

ooocca:cic<cr:Q:<CLcr<i.oCQ:<(XQ:<D:Qc<(xc:<a:cc.<c:(XCJ crz>UJ 0aiZ2a2SU22u33U32U3J0^2U22USSU330 UZX >tt/)t/)»-« »-H

I— H<<|—w (_2 2

UJ O OU- oi- o o»-* o<oI

3

O OO>r mo

O OOOO U^->*J><->

111

Page 119: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

OH-» UJ

»—

1

UJ (N»-h —

.

a.

h- a: f-.aq. 2Z in «—

QCUJ -^ 21— "* a. UJt-i 3-»O z in »-« • in h- m^Q •» Ol •*—

<

0- 2!CNh- 1—

»

z h-Z z CQQ. 0000 z •1 z fe •**Z CO

r- •• •h h- •0 —

1

CNJ <.—1 f\|

a.h-Z „

rzLL< ^ a. I

zz -^ •i ^H -i- h- h <w«-h- •» h- z H-«^ z f\JZ

h- HH z •. z •» a. h-—O z •» ^s -1- h- z— cLO • w O z X h-Z 2 •» O

l-H —t Q •» t-i z •. 1— h- OO-^ z 2: h- 2: a: »<—

<

2! Z< Q** •» u. O 00 > h- HZO LL »o

-^ O X <N O k •1 < z »-» » <N_| w<h- ^H »-H Q. 1 <N <f >t 5! --^fM vf Q.LLh-«/> -H <* z X O h-Z ZQ «•

-IUJ h- * t—1 —»«^ O Z z > z »o Z Z •»

Ulh- O < h- a: t— •. •» » 4-h- •• <r og—

.

h- 21 z h- »—1 1—

* • Q. h-Z • h- a. Zt •h < O • • * z -o • 00 ZS <Q— 1 O X < 2: WW O 1- ••—(O O •• h-

2: -j O * h~ —>,— 1-.--

1• oz — -•

1~> *^ h-Q oo

300 • 11 < _J > 00 *-% a: cc > --» q; 2ZZCC *"» UJ QQ OO- OO- h-2! OO- OO QD< f\l ll

X •><c\j*: LL Q u_ h-h- 00(N OKI u_ cou.oo>fr m ^0 h- a.»—

<

HQhC O O •» 00 00 O.—twO^—1—

»

•• •> ^H**f- <—> 1—11/) z—at OOUJUJ 2: • ^•—t •—ll—

»

2!2! »h-< — —* 2 CNJ •»

h- II II UlXO t z CO z y- 11 11 •» -2T -2: 2J 3>0 - »y •. #- Z—Q-^-j< hUZ Ul a z Ul vO vO LL vO sO ul UIOvOU-O^O Z «.

2: »-«(\| »-.ujz t-i •«— —I •..—.—

.

• 3 2 —I >_««^ , 3: — h- - 11*—

I——' h-3 • h- 1— -^ «—

.

w</)—

«

-OO h »*«w«- •—' CtrH<t 000 2Z < LL. < •—••-» a _) ^ < LL.LL.CJ _) llo ~5~h- OOUJU. Ot-ii^ -J LL -J 11 h-uiui uuli; _J U_U.h-UIUJ UJUJ LL.00 II

_j Hhw oh-o z> _J => w»-i Zh-h-_lh-h--J 3 _l-JZh-h-_Jh-h- _JO o»-<UJ ZU4 ID »-H UJmi-hmJmwJUJ O DDl-((HtHjH •-H LIIZ5 •-•m2:Q O ox _J ST _l O— 3ara.ct:<ct:a:<z> _J 2:3:ct:ct:Q:<ct:Q:z52; 11 <NJZ

Q LJ^> < > < OO ZQ.2202202 < »Q.22U23Z> OX. Oh- 2! »—

HH O m QnJ-OO M _J -4tO>t—

1- —I—I-' 1— _IZ<NIOUJ UJ _l Ul z z UJ _l_l Z_J<X u_ X < X O OIL Q X «U_ D-Qh-C

»—

«

00h-COf-ti-t

h- O h- O Uh

O0>

O

OOc\J

h- UUh JO00Q

M00000 OOO OOO OOO

11 2

Page 120: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

•—

1

a:a: UJ «—

h- »—

< •» -^ 22: h-

m 3h- •» Dl •—• s: z< 2 •» l/>

K- *i 1- CO—

f\| 2* <Ql •» a

< z 1-* m z —

.

O- \- m* z »- h~ —

^* 1- » z a.• i— •» car -3

O-} < z 2: l/)0 •.

(N o 2 Qv0"-Hr\jt-« ai <\jm •» C\l

to Q_(M >* •M Wa— a: zh- UJ -o z #h-2

»-* > l-»- m 1OS z z - QOoz t—

1

a • zo 11w 2:0 O <<-» II « 3 -»— 1 H—

< h-— QC 00-3-» 2: 00- -3f-«

LL CDOON <— ••

• •—

1

o • o-H— 2 »Huu 2: «^H •-^LUz~- z ceo » 2 t- -1 Z—• UJ o UJsOOU- z "3 • UJ23 t—

1

W • 3 II * 23•-•1-2: h- *»

»

— </> -H •-l»—i>i£•-•UJ < LLQ 3 -3 i-hUJ

— 1-3 _J LL.H-LL'UJ || 1-3ZZ 3 _JZH-h-_J O ZZ

U_ OmUI O ^•-K-H HH _JLUt-1MIL O'-'UJh-i OhD _l 2a:a:a:<3 N3«-< Oh-

3

ZZ < >as2Uzo ZZ Zo»-« o •—iQOO o»—

1

C£Ol- _i^- 1—(NO Ol— 3z UJ >j z z »-o X <u_ 00 a UJo h- o»-. UQ a.

ooo O 000c\im^ in s0r»-cor\l<\|C\| CN rgrgrsi

uuo O

X -

a:— uj i-t1-3 a:<V._I 1—

~» 2 -< <- > 2

^ <xo.an— .

x *h< <rhh i-<2 -a-

DC -^—. iIh -» —

.

—. I- < X <\s 2 •» *u_h-a: •> o.•• •» «v- - O—JQ. «-»«-»• «•

- - < -XX UJQ. X I—XQ"-» • hmZQ<"»S^m •

»-4UJ U-XoCQiO •• -CC <tCCl— "^^On-ih-l—»~iC£UJ'^- - H-1—< •• o:«woi »xx< ui<a:- m mi—22a: \— • *-h-i2-»go2ujxxoo<t u-ix xa:a: cc

\— 1-1 •-<O2< CD> •-•UJ en I—H> "o. Ui(-•-•0:0:0- •* #zc£\-a:«.# •->X i— 1— oocLQ.o-HHh <h-220-inzO «Z**-»- <Q< » -^i-h

K4- 22<h-HHUJ2 I 2K>H- •--UJ cL • • •! O. ••«• »0-Jr2<MCQ<I—<<<TI-X3>>a.>(M<I• Hi- -.».».-•--».. u_-

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx—.minmmmininmirMnmmmininmm

.^N^>s

hhhl-l-l-l-HI-Hhl-l-hl-l-l-h

222222222222222222a:a:a:a:ocr:cca:a:a:a:Q:c«;a:a:a;a:csi qOOOCOOGOOOOCOOOQCO zU.U,U.U_U-U.U,U.U_U.U.U_U.U-U_U.U.U. UI

000000000000000000o«-H(Mrn^msor»cocT'0^f\irn^-mvor-OOOOOOOOOO-H'^'^'—l«-4i-*»-4f-

1

O OO (J>i^>

113

Page 121: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

cuuocuo.aacL»»»»>»»»»uouH *> 2:—> 3to> OO> -Z> <£—> OX> vOl/5

> ro<> <r -> CO> Orvj> ^><> m •>

> zu.00 > »>nUJ > ^<I- > Q -< to > z~»

00^ UJ > ZoOZm h- > ^OOO < > 002"»-iq: zw > *-<«-.

hO i-hUJ > D>-00<O O-J > Ooo0130 cdcn > »<:00 o< > —

»

COZLULU n*-" > <<J-UK h- cocJoc > Za._ii—2< uj < > 2:2:owes: h-» , i> > —ujZwwm <f_ > ot—<Qh-X Z<> > Z<o mss > <mQQ>a: OmS > ocl

I ujujoiCL ocxis > -2:00 1—x xdcujcl ooo > — UJ "^z 31— ac3oo< oa: > >ti— oO 2! 3 UlOOcQ OQ- II > <» •• Qi-h h-is: oo<olu a. > aicg o\— Men cOUJ X Q<>t > oa •

hh <rsiX C~>2"LLJ— UJ Q. > XS O2: <t— o xuus: > 00 »uj *>sh J D U_U_ U- *-«XUJ > Z — »— Ou- <os:xooaro u-h-h > a * - 2:UJ 1-HUjHHf- UJ > i-i —»r^ 3a t— ooM3u.a:coa: uj 11 •» > j— c£Cl 2:

>-«o<2;ujuj2:uj x ro > < 02:uj z_i »-icocor>ccxi——.q. > CC >UJ n._J huQNSSZSIm 002: > < 1— oca c*:<33 3c£ II Olii > —I Z ««t Q< QQ< ZZJZh 2:1— > CJ O—ro oen UJUJ3ii < <—— > UJ HON •

cc xxq:oujujj-uj2:>j-x •• > o ooo< cn o<Z hmu<X!OX «-»00<N > *—^ " »-i o> LLLLLLCDI—Hf-t—CD£X<Q. > UJ O——H - ("0

O 2! > .J Uioorg -4 »vII II II II II II II II II > *ttl > CD CChN m O

•—»— > < Q.O< O»00 > t—I O •• CC P0

«-%*"*0 •> > C£ UJ •"— UJ zh^ZH > < JOH O^«*- 2TwwG. > > CQ2T2: UJ <r\irnu_a3<QH-ooz:ct:>2: > ddz t— 1—NNNMZZZC^-OOOuj > OZ« Z <««ZZZZU.X<|- > Q *U_ >-* Q

I- * <-» u o- > **oUJ CJ O Q- >

;>UJ O O Q. :>*uuo uuuuuououuuoououoouououuouuuyuo 00 00 00

114

to CJ CJ Q.<r C.1 CJ a•» CJ Q.

00 CJ a.O CJ D.z CJ a.•> CL

00 CJ a.1—

t

CJ CJ a.a.

CJ a.•h a.

C5 CJ Q-~CJ a.

< U CJ 0.O CJ 0.K CJ X a.

a: CJ ¥—1 Q.

CJ CJ CC Q.X CJ CJ h D.*• CJ < O-

cC CJ 2: a.O CJ CJ a.> CJ CJ OJ 0.*• Q.

f- u u_ a.2" CJ CJ a.SI CJ CL

•> CJ z a.O CJ CJ a.Z •—

1

a.Z • CJ h- Q.* z CJ < a.< h- CJ _J Q.z CJ al 3 Q.

z: u CJ a.i CK CJ _J a.

«* h- CJ < Q-

r<l z CJ CJ Q.rvl CJ < a.<r X>J" CL•i cjco h- 0.

-H 2T ON CJ a.<M CJ Z5-t CJ UJ CLM CJ < z Q.

< CJ •a CJ —

1

CLCJ Z^ h~ CL

~~> <-H CJ 3 CLCJ 2" CL

2! CJ <l- q: ClLL CJ ooto CD ClCC CJ 3 3 CL\- •0 00 CL

CJ 1-3 CJ a.LU _J< u < CL

Z CL—"^—

.

• • •• CJ 00 CL

h- CJ 1—

a.DU. CJ ccsxi CJ a

* u Of- CJ 00 CLa:x CJ x< CJ HH CLCO 00 »-Q CJ X CLr»< 3 H- a.00 * CJ < CJ CL

CJ 0.•« CJ CJ 0.

CJ CLCJ a.CJ u.CJ 0.

Page 122: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

-4 CD ^ .—1 co —

1

2: M 2T s: M 2ID -^ <t 3 3 —

»

< 3 -*D 1

Q Q 1 D•» CO LL •a •» CO LL •• CD

LL IVl IVl CO LL M M CO rvj

M < < rvi rvi <T <I PsJ << + < < + <»

1 en k •»1 cc »

1

>4" o «$• «$ <fa u. O o_ a. LL >0 CL LL

2: ivl co 2: 2: rvl ro 2T tNj

Ui <t < LU LU <t < LU <i- »- K \-•a •»» ^ *• •» ^ V «> —

«

ro m ro roCL 1 i CL CL 1 1 O. |

s: O 2: ST O 2:0—

»

LU •—I—. .-» LU LU st— -^ uu>o—1- h- O t- h-

a. i O-H -H m ro » 0-^ -^ -c--*o c\i !-•-« H-

1

cm r\j V—*-\ t-

i

esjl

»-h

sO a. o. o-.-* CL a.ro 2: O— M 2: i- 2: o— <m» O 2:0^< LU O LU —»pH LU N- UJOm o »- o o O—~* »-- C»—••—

t

1— O ho CM •» -^21 21 IT* •a o •» —2 z. O «— »—

z

2: -»-^^H—

^

i < < —IrH ^ »!«.» ft^1 < < h- ^t <r> O-.— 0-5: COO O O i i -.—a.——««-» Q-2!cOn —»—

.

V)OlQ-CDOz H- rHr-H^^fVl K 'H-h 2: x> IDN O 002TMm osiog t-i>-iLUO< II II »-hkh (\i rg lu CO co ro to to UJO< II II Ororo ZZllK II

o O y- O 1- << h- h-2: o—._ w—

II•~» -^ o »»i« »i>^«^ _ >»• • II • —» —

^

—»>_>«_• '»«»«'' f-*3 «_* h- w Oil II

•— H —Hz —•CXCC x> — • _I-H -H —

»

x>a:ct: acoruj U^ .—

t

<a:a: X> _l—

1

9- OOh(/)i/1< ft—

I

t—t C0(OOO<OO •fOvi- < • »-i »—

t

ZOOvtwio< •!-•

0<r^XX\K<Z- 1 Io o CM< 2T— 1 O ZX>-fO«Zv02: rs1 <H"iLLw-tUJwH < <3:s:lu<k-iLL— -^LIJ——

t

m "m.*"—

»

mz • n ii < : ii n t- IVl i-O -t • II II II II \~ II ii zluuoi- M HD -H • H II < II II 1— ISJ rHZ uu o~•<LL ZLL LU o ZH-H-2TO-•<LL ZLL LU o<u_

f-t2T'H(M II ("0>fr 1D>-< Q Z ^c\jrO>*- rOsj- i-H O »-i c Z^rvl 11 ro>t** •O.Q. CLQ._lt/:1—

1h-l- t- • CLCLCLCL^JCLCL— I— _lt^»— t- 1- K •a.a. a.a._j—> 1—

ii sz:cu2:5:_i»-i1 Z LU 2: 2; 2:2:^2:2: 2_l»-1 Z LU S21L212:-Ia: —iLULUMLULU<OLL 1DO OZ>-^LULULUUJ<UJLUll 1D<QU- OO 03^LULUMUJLU<LL Oto-* »-hH H-< H-Hocll-H LDO OZml-hl-l-(JHHM (LiOCi*-" OO 0ZmHI-<I-I-O>hQ — I I—OO Z Z.

OMUL OLL OLL_!'-<•—

1

Ok-» L_)»-i

—I<o00

00 000h cm ro ^ in

115

Page 123: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

CDM<r

I

LL

<r+

orn<

<

^H -H coX 2"

fvl

D O <Q 1

— —

»

—k •> ^% LL

CO IX M —

^

—< CDrvl ISj CD <r ST 2: NJ< < M + =5 3 <•» •» < a: a O !

>d" >* 1m •» — LL

O. O. UL -O en LL M2T ST rvl m tvl IVI CD <LU LU < < < <l M +1- 1- •» •» < a:•» •» M M 4- <* 1

ro m O. a. LL >0Ql a. 1 1 2: 2: rvl m2: "SL LLt LU «» <LU w co— —

»

»- »-1— »— > •» »• — —•n *k O-H -H m m

fNJ N !->-< t—

t

0. 0l O 1 1 <NO- a. 2: 2T O »—

«

2: 2: O— —

«

LU LU -*— —tu LU CD 1- »- •w0—-»i_ 1- O (J5 •* •* 0-t ^

•» •• ~>-z. z (\l <\l H-HH t-H 000^^c\jr\j_

1

—«.—t <J < o_ a 1—

t

H 1 1 1 1 cl-—.Q.3IC0O O 2: 2: O— M Oinics! c\I<m 2! :rr>M LU LU O O

0»-<>-<>-«»-Hi.ijmroujO<I 11 II—,—,—»—, (_. 1- O O

O 1- H k •» — 2T Z 1

<»»«.«».^— »««—1 •— — -H^<\|f\l^——» P~t^H •< <

—• — — 1— 1 1 1 1 O. Cl2"COO O —

oL"~^(

*-* o

X>X> CCCC —_J^ —

I

cgcooooOoo<oO«3 • •-« i-hm««ZX>Z-i O< <hU.-fHU!«

-H • II II || I f— II « — M ^3LU O 0~*<LL ZU.

•O-ClClO—ia.o-_ioo«— 1— 1—

< 2!2:2:2:_j2:2:_ji-h z2 f-I LULULULU< LULU<OlL OOZHhhhl-OI-l-OUH OUII —

'

aoLU

or>f\ju-OZmh

oo

t-ti-n-tt-HLU>-Hi-«LUQ< II II

X>X> X>- —_J^H -h

O ««Z«Zh O—»LU < <t-tLL^-^|jj«^HD II II II II h- II II I— M —IDZ O O—<LL ZLL

ht-Q.aoLajacLJV)*' |—h-2:2:2:2:z:_J2:2:-l'-, 2:

OOLUUJLULU<LULU<QU_ OOOUI-t-l-l-Ohl-UOH OO

o2?

CM

00

Qa

^ 11

+11 —LU

t-tLU<>-« »-iLUi-oz 11 r>ZZZO — 2T0»-H CO"—< »-H

Ol- II —IH-lU-l—z. -z.

D"*a oo»-«o o

oI—LUCL

o2:LU

o o oao

ooo

00 o

uu

116

Page 124: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

uuoouuao aa>»»»»»»oouo o a. > •i

o o X Q- > -^

o o »-H o. 00 > >o u (X a LU > 2:

o o h- a. H > 2:

o o < a. < > Xo o z Q- Z oo >o o Q- M LU > •»

.

o o M a. D _J > —

»

o u K- o. (X CD > <N

Z o c_> z 0. O <r > Ou

<r o o LU a. O h-< > z» o CJ —

t

a o a: > »•

X o o o Q. < > K00 o o •—

t

Q- oo z > > Z< o o UL Q. LU 2 > •>*

•» o o LL O- h- o > > 2T

> o o LU O- < z s; > <too o L_) o D. ooz ^ 2: > •>

<I o o o a Z^ z Z) > •-*

•> o o w 0l OD Z5 a > a.

X o o o. »-ict: > zz o u < D- h-O LL 11 > *-»

X. o o 0. 00<O Q > X•» u o u_ o. LUDU v0 > 00 ^h

>- u o c Q. CO oo >• > <r D.

z o o CL OOZLUui UJ 2: > •» z^ o O z CL UU<f 1— n 2: > •-» •»

•» o o o a. _J»-Z< _j X > D. —

<

r\l o o •—

1

Q. OWDX < Q > z ^a. o u H- a. 2MMM(y>> • > «— ••

z a o < Q. <DhXZ in > >n0 (Nl

k o z CJ _J Cl <DQIK > > oo> -5

D_ o H «_> X D. QQ>a;ii-t»— 2" > <2: •»

2 o 0£ o o a. LULUCXOul—

<

2: > »2I f-4

•» o u _l a. 00 >o:luq.i-•s: X > —X -5

Q o a: o < a. z aT3oo<root—

a > ^Q ••

z o 1- o o O- o Luooeo i3X •» > ^^ •* r^-

•» o Z o Q. 1—

1

00<OUJO-0 -t > xm —

1

< o < o cc a. h- COUJ X a: > > z>- •»

-4 2! o X-* o rx a. •-^ OSU-hZQ. 2; > ^2: v0

< *• o OCO o LL a. Z o 2D. 2: > OO fc"^" >—> <MH- u zo> o a. »—

i

LLLL. LLO< X > z —X m> —«»-•—•

> Z o x-h o LU a. u. ooa:oz Q > vtO in •1

t-i o < o z 0- LU LU iiiLUX » > »—

<

•M •> •—

1

^^^(rn,^LL. w o •• u 1—

1

D_ Q ojctcccx: X»-<ni > H- >-<f •» 0-

H o Zn o t- 0. lulus:lulli»— cx:> > < z> «t 1 ++z< X o <c\4 o X a. LU CDCD3CDX 1-2! > c£ ^z •—

<

3 < o z <_> o Dl _l SXZSH II <T2I > < z •» <t st >*«*• •"«•*

u_ o <»- o cc Q. CD DD =5 EX > -J zx ro ^ t—it—l»-it—

t

Z LU o oooo o CO a. < ZZJZ II — O > O na i—i +< o o 3 o 3 a. —

i

< o_< - > LU 1—1 •• •» ^fM-"—— II

U o o •o u oo a. CC LULUH-LU'—

z

CM > O 00m f\l —t r-« -^u t-3 o a. <l xxox>r— II >- > »-•> H-1

| | ++ +-H->LU o _l< o <t a. > 1— 1— 1— 1

—X 2. > UJ OS •»1 ^ II ->

z o u a.:xoo-^21 > -J LUZ .—

t

-H-4vt-t^ II

•—

I

o • • •• o oo D. II || II II Z<cnZD > CD (XX >—

1

K- o <_> HH a. :*: »-clq > < Q.Q a. i-t m<NX o QCUj u Ql »—z > HH » Q- Z< II II H II II -t-3o o Oh- u 00 O- -•Q. •«-H > cc lucni LU zoa: u x< o —

1

Q. •4-ZI-> > < _i> O II orn>J-m-0h-OCD o l-Q o X D- —zr > > CD^l LU II f-ImhhmhDX o X o \~ a.

;

>->'-2: > DS h- -^OO o < o Q_ <oi-a-Zoo2:3 > CX Z CLr^O

o o o. ZZZZ^«Q > DO t—

1

ZiiQh- o «-> D. > M-O o o O. >111 o o D. >~3 o o Q. >ai u o a. >uwuoo uouuoouoouuuouuuuouoouuyuou o o

11 7

Page 125: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

>0~>>02T>X2:32:03v*o^"V>ir\

-»-«» X>-"*• "^

mm2:2:32:

"*

~m «)~> »—<M 03 —

m

> > —a >-ms 2:m <a"M +— r02: ^^i^>rr «— 2I> ,nn —»—- -—

1 >2:—>~-C\iT.Z> <N32: >-x (\i c\im—

<

2:3 mm#Z:Ct f0r0*Q2: mm coco * mm* >m 2:0 MM

(\I<\J-H- 3 * 3 MM << # kh# 2:> 3c\JO*v —«-C\|>^0 cm ^2:2: Q«v w—

w^-> > —— 1 5>•—>ds:

sr^fN >XZH\ 2: 2:03 *vCN >x>xr > 2TZT2:> >xm—

-

S>X5:\Q > cocozzD^r i^^DZM coco DlO^DnV MS <<iiVQ>2- ds:> <<o—1.-

1

D«D>N >2"2:3 m 1 | 32: 1 HHM 2T> 2:3 1 1

o i i +2:0 + 02: O t 1 + 1 1 +2:2: 02:0-t 3 O—. 3 vQ O—

32: h-3 «*'"•

-.-»(\IQ— 1- C\|—0 —0 CM— C\|03 a— OO •* Q-O--* >-x # *—

O

Ot-vt^»~—l*-***- 1 OOZZtt 3

— 1— mm-»coco •* c\J<N# l~ 1— 1 M t—|M

O —

1

-J"0 "H <r< M >t M\D(NO*—«-> II II —> II II ooo-—— <n >•—--> II ll 11 11 (J—-

<

O 2! O— 2! 11 11 2: 2! <j? OO VX2T-.— H- >-X2:— >x • s:>-xr • .-. —» 1—»>xI——0)003 -•CO003 1 .ZZO-KN DZZD -«• COCO

OO <<Om<ni OCX<<OMC\J i^i«iLU>> O^^OMCN mcnj om<<OOOm -3-3 OZ -3-3 OM #2:2: -3 -J m-j-3 Oh000 II II II » •• II II II •> -

II II 2:2:111 II II II II * » •* •»II II

• • • »—IrH «-» « ^HM • <333 mm • -H^^ —^ •

00—usMf\irnMM iu_i<\imMM "UJHNZDO Erm^insOMM LUmm IDMCNJz>>> <zr>>> 2>-> -1>>>>- z -tZ>>

II II -H '2:2:2:—^- z. •2:2:2:'—- cm «2:2:— 1-2:2:2:2:-'— tw<w ^ »2-2:2:2:2: U.i 2:2:2: LU 2:2: zsrss muj ai 2:2:

-»-» MDDDIZD •-H3332:2:3 M3DU. 1D33332:2:-H 3-^2:2:3 •-•33unooo«z unooo«2 unoQH (JQQDD« zr-^«z uncomc\J2! m *- t-i z. OM Ml z-3-3 •— h-O •— l—O •—

»

hl- t—•> •» z^iaj ^tnuj Z zmujr-4MMU_ 0^3—<LL OM3—ILL. OCIL M3MU.M»—iM»~i O 2mm Z*-**—i OUm Z 1-IM

Om OM Omwww f-l— H-l Hh-z z *-

2:2:0. oou. OOIL OOLL.«M OO*-) OOm OOm

OO OO O OOOmcm m«r m nor-ao

1 18

Page 126: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

CO—>5!>-

<\i32r

•«• 3MSQ>3!>32: CMor>+ 02:

3CM—-O

# I—

> II II

ST——3O-HCM

-5-5II •» »

21 >-

DrV.Q

>m2*>212"32T03

cm cocoCOCO-H> i- t* 1

1—•»—«-tfCM-*—

2Z>-X2"OOoO3<<Q

I I

+

>XOOl/)o«

o~* I I

c «

mmo

—>xzz

II II

UJ^fNz:>>

2:2:

CM

-«- •—••—

2:

30000o«

cmco#>-#2:102:>32-Q2:^3-tQ>

2!+ 2!3

(NIO*>-M- I

si-

> II

• CM-5-5

II II II II ••

>2;wwo2: mm 2:2:

0<< Z-5QQOh|_|

ZOOUL

m>tm

D3DDQO

>2:

2:32:

LU2! ID<z

t-H

l-Ozmijj

o i£Omh-H-

co—>—.-. 2irn2:>

cococm32"

>>-X2!^>v

«32:csio or>(M I I DZ~4 +QS

-»-% =3O (Nl—O

•—••—•-« I-»

o -•O—»—> II 11

2:

00003

t-l -5-7

II II II »• »

>-s02!>-2!2-DSQDSO>m2T>-2:2:DSQ3

— I

coco cm coco cmco—H-tt-H-a- *—••—•-)< >co

* -«-2:>.^— CM——m5-2"

> >32:>X2T>X2:COoo oo 2: 00 002:^0<<3<<3m«v

O O. 0>cmmi 1 11 2i>-» + +2:2:— —» 32:O cm CM03I— —4—!-»• 4-<t#~0

•—t»-fM> t—•»—1 -M- J —•

1

O iH <tCD—.—>—->. II II

21 2T

0000300003

II II II II II II «

>— roz>2:

coco cm 2:3•-••-"»• 2:0

#3——CMQ"^>2"^r\j2" >Q>2!2:3

+ SO3

c\|0«-»

#~I

>x0000<<

o•J- 1 I

o

oCD——

.

—>-xoo</)

> n 11

2:21——30-*cm

II II II * *

LU<—ICMCOi—ich LU^^CMCO^-m'Ot-iKH LU 1—» C\| CO »-i hhZ>->-> 2>>>>->-> 2I>->->-• 2:2:2:^-^0 • 2: 2: 2: 2: 2: 2:——o »2:2:2:2:2:2: LOLU 2:2:2:2:2:2: LfMJU 2:2:2: LU

-•3332: 2: -(Dh33333 32: 21 ~i3 -» Z>33 2T 2". 3ODD(J« 2-)CjQaQQO« Z-)OOQ<t<ZOm Om m-ilu+ 1

OOILOOm DOLL.0(JM

oo o o

h-H— H3 <-^z. 2:2 -»^m

OOli Oh-iLU"-iOUm Oh 3 II IIzzoOmh^cmcoOl— CMi-«i-»

z.00oo

O 000CO >tLn<o

119

Page 127: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

CM <N* H-fl"—-

-

#<M <NI 0^ *^>mm >~._2:>> 2: CM CM2:2:2: 2imm •H- •*

=35:2: ——=>>-> * fr-.—--ODD 02:2: (\l CMOO mm 2:2: >.__ >-mm>-»tH + 2-

—••-»2: mm 3:>>—^2:2:2:w— <\| CM Z>>>- Dzr

•frCM^ >X^V.^ HHQIZ ~i—<ooo>x# >> Z2* »—«-« 2:2: MM OOCO CO -^3:2" o^^-hcM'H + Z>3 +<<>2:2: O >>> 00 —— >VV.

2:00 -h 1 1 2:2-2: CM CMh- 1 1 3ETQQ rrr >-Xtt V.N. >X#CM-hM 3 0-.-DDD coco-ft COCO* >>.^^»o«»»w 1- OOO <<rH(\l—

1

«hss:O O Q.Q. >>> >2:3:

OH-cmcm<— 1 I OOZZ ' -« 1 1 2:2:3: (M 1 1 3ZZ>0CO rgo CM 2:2:2: CM 3IOO^o—*-i— II II <-wh- II II ^3DD —.3

CD cC O— CC OOO O OwwO >XO—-» 1- >xo-.-. •—mm 1—mm1 'ZZW —t COcoco I—«»—««-»w— •—••—•"—

1 sOO ^^QHfvj 00_<<Q^(N|OnO-H -5-5 CD^ -5 -J O-^h II II CJ3~.~ H- II II

CM OOO II II II - •»II II II » "• ol QC

^^^^ • • • CNJCM «•» • <N<M -«>-xo-«» ~.>xa-»—k OO—»UJ «-• f\|m fthh LU'^rMm •—••—• cococo co coco

-4^'-* Z>->> QZ>» -H<<0—ICM -<<r<o—«cmQ- II II ^ IS2S-'— z »2:2:2:«-— "3 -3-) -5 -3-3

1 +Z 2:3:3: LL? 3:2:2; UJ II II II * ••II II II

• ^o=>=>2:2::d •hDDDZXD • CNIfNI • CMCMmrn »_i lu")goo«: lu-3000<<:z LU^rvim *~*t-i uj-^(Mm»-i»-H•—It—IrH —4<n:z t-i Z t-t 2Z>>-> z>>>

+ -3-3 •*- k- O •— 1—

a

MW || •• » Z muj "Z muj 2:2:2: muj 2:2:2: uj--tCM(\|r-tLL OND -lU- CCNI3«tZ)332:2:r\J=)mz>333:3:3

f + —1~3«—•—'h-lf-t O Z •-lei O 2hCQG<1< -2:»-HOQO<t<2:~3 Dm Oh CJh-i 1-1UJ

mm II ww<M> l-H^ l-l 1-)-— K-Z)mmO Z z Z 2Zmrgsru. OOLL OOli DOIL Oi-hUJ

II II <N|-5<<i-h OO »—

1

O0*-i UUm OI—3zz 2

*tmo Ol-H a:•—1>-)0

za

1-UJex

O O OOOf- 00 O ~l CMf<W-H —* .—» CM CM CMCM'M

120

Page 128: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

X1- XDIUH5-O0OC»-«•—<C •

M3ZO0<i«iUSOOQ •

m_jo:5"O^OLLO •

aoo

z 2:a o ICOH-l H-

H-l-zI- oo 3i—i »—

«

2-5:to o >-<DO UJ NC£0a. a: <u.z

a. oo#z Z#O -J o# omQ< h-l* zr~C3 »-* »—

<IO -* K OOK-Kli! oo* oooo a:O0UJ a* UJ< UJ5:x 0~* HUJ 1-

UJ h- * < UjV)Wh z* zq 2:

u Qczrjr o* i ii i

m UJO I-.* OcCX >h-i00 l-# a:o1—

<

2: <tl-Z <« oD < ar<o H* oZ a. t-3n O0-H- ooUJ O Oh fr zO- o QUJ< -J# Qmo. cc UJ > <* Ml 00< ' O- uiza: H-* C£H- ococm Z* o a: ui

_j»~«i/) O* a i-Oh- CO ivl-fr s:z uj

i-hO t-i-H- k- 2:U_Q CC* 3Qnzo Ott i—

i

CUJ X* g:ZUH # oO < z#•-•>_J :$#h-CQUJ Ott< aC Z*-J a: :*:#z> au o oo-1 z z< 3 o

H o •—

t

_> cc 1-a. uj a <1- I u- »-3 »- 00O

u_cc oUJ1- UJ3 2:a. <2: zoo

o oo o00 *tr- mh- m• •

m >orsl CM

>o m—

<

mO vOo f<>

-I >t

A AI i

<\i m

oc egUJX 00 51a. oo >j-« o oa. 2: x

o1—00

UJo 00DZ QC

»-i<r uj

CDO^ UJ

*tin

>t rg>r in

00• t

o> 00

r- roC\l <N •

CO <M QO —i HvO s0

J-*<«00

>o -t Q*m *

f\l r- O*in i-^ UJ-H-

CO m >* at • <** UJ

lf\ 00 LU* >UJin in O0* a:_jin <M CO* LUOCsJ 0> O* 00zr» r- co<rO>* «*

00

oo

<a:C

00

00

UJ

000000r-» .-< roOOOOOO• • •OOO

<f <f —

1

vt h-h- (N

• • t

>t in vOfM P->J- m -t•^ v0

«J" m m >rCO 1—

i

vt- Osl vO

O O OO O OO O OO O O

<M -O v0 O• t t •

m CO (N P->J- rH

m ^ in inin -h

r\j O r--T CM 0> r*<N <N H (N

^ 2!

O UJCL <N < »-

UJ CO zX 00 O0 UJ 2: <a O0 OO z _l or:

•—

1

O O Z)Q. 21 2: X 2:

O -H f\| CO «$

121

Page 129: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

oo#z#o#

»-•«oo*C*CL-H-

#

a#

00*

oo#CCHUJ#>*<*a:*l-##a*

ui#oo#a*o-w-

o*#

UJ#h#<*_l#!3*o#-J*<*o*a:*Ol*

K XD UJ 1-2" 00 a:t—

<

1—

1

O •

r*j 2 •^ 00< *:

o 2:O a •

»—

«

_j CX STCl£ o LLO •

O

I o OK i- 2*X>3: 2:»—

1

Psl cc O< u_ 3

o

00 00UJ <

Z Qa a:CC

2t—

t

h-t X(X h-O cC

o

a:o

00•za>—

>

<00

u_oUJ2:<

•4-

>too >tCC OUJ •

h- &UJ t-2: (N

00

vO

OOf\l

00 inCC ao

lu •

1— unUJ in2: in

f\i

r*-

>i-

CM

O0O0O

O O O O O OO O O O O O

00 00 00 ao ao ao 00r>- r»- P- r- r^- r- r-o> CT^ m m t—t —

*

.—

i

• • • t • • •

nD in in 00 CO in—

^

-^ -^ ~4 ro

CM (Ni en en co 00 en(M CM ^ —

i

cm <N m>0 O O o> CT <}>r O CM en -H enen —i cm CM ^cm —

*

en CM >r rn in

A1

A1

A1

A1

A1

A1

A1

CM CM m r<1 .$

00encm«rsr

en>r

r»o

enr»-

>t>*r»

enoen

O

<CO0000o

CM

(^O

CM

00

o>0

enin

>fr

o•

aoincm-*

O

0l21UJ

Q

en

in>o00en

00enCMCM

^0

00—I

00CMCM•

00incm0>

h-o

oI

<a.a

in

00 00 00

O UJO (-

>! r-

1

UJ>f -H 2: •

00 CM 00• t CC

CO CM UJ1—

t

1

Ul >o• t 2: -0

2: 21 •

NO 00>0

O n0

CM00

-J-

•M• • r*

Q O •

OO O • •

II II

002:

H-l

h-<

II II II

CC 00 UJCDCC cc 2:CC LU <UJ Q-

00 ccX CC l-H

h- O O CC3 CC CC2: CC O UJ»-• UJ •-H

rsl a: UJ >< X

h- y <_J 3 _i < (X< 21 < K 3y- t—

t

h- 00 Orvi a »-1 O

I- < H Q <

122

Page 130: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

o o oo o o

U! •* >fr •—

o 00 o «* r-Q z <x o p- (NJ

»—

i

< LU • • •

cc h- H -t in vO

o 00 LU r\l o r*•—

i

s: -* ro >*Q .—

<

o

<*»-#<# cQ* LU •

» > LU 00O* CC _lLU# LU Oh-M- oo 2: t

O* CD <t 2:LU* Qa;* •

<**o*o#

r- 0> >o r-•-* 0* o> co

r» CO r-i C\J

r-» co ct»

oo m rn• • • •

m in CO CM-J- m r-H

inin

*0 (N osf (N o>

N N H

in

<N

00

o

00

LL.

OLU

< XQl

0000O

o<CO0000o

LU

LU

Q OX

<o

123

Page 131: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

r- r- r- r- m roX .-* —

1

<

pH ^ —

1

l-# l- X in in 0^ 0> —< ^^ «fr

z# X>UJ 1- 0* 0^ in in vl- >t rn

LU«- zco c£ in in c> 0^ c> O roz# MM n •

i-* MZ2 ^* CO cr> >* vt m m -0

to-* <* ^H —

1

1

-^ (Nz># 2:-5-M- CO • CM <M m m CO 00 mQ# 1—

*

I ct 2: (M (NJ -^ i—4 f\j t\j m<# a:u LL* O • «o 0^ 0> 0> 0^ -0

CO* •«* <N ro rH mUJ* rO -^ <NI tNJ -^

a:-*<» IP O <NJ iH m fM >* ro in:=>* t-l- zOtt O A A A A A A Aco# 2:2: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

t •* ^-.0H-# no: —

«

<N fM CO ro «* vfCOtt <TLL z<•>>U.l»_J# a CD *4" <f O vO# o z O 0^ r- m

>•><• X t—

1

*t 0> p«- t\i

a?-* \- 1- CO «d- in in

H- uu coco a: O >r CO

c.# 2: UJ< UJ • • • »

Z* 1— UJ l- CT» m c\l CO

O* z <£ LU h- *i- <\l mh* O zo 21 r\i 0^ -H (NJ

I--M- —

1

•—IM CO r»- CO CNI

»-i# 1— qq; O —i

CO* < OCO -O s0 vO

O*CL*# UJ 00 vO a* m »t

Z# z O & 1—

in

O* z o»-. CM CO p^

l-H-fr c Ml CO in >* in r-4

h-# —

a:»- CC co r- 0^ m<# 1- oa: UJ • • • •

l-# *~i n 1— IT\ o> CO COcott 2:2: UJ in m in in

fr z h- z in o> r\l (Nl

iu# OO rg m >J- 0^

co* i j 1—

1

r- p«. r-- r-a:* CCLU-& >- O «* <* •4- «4-

># CO<#or:*»-»•

#O*UJ-W- COCO* zO*_J# CH

o* 1—

* <.LL* H-Ott CO* a.

Ztt LL ^ zO-t* O UJr-i# c\j < t-h-# UJ CO<* 2; CO CO UJ z_J# < CO CO 2 -JO* Z a ZDO* z z Q X—1*<*O* a p-« CM m >r

0>

ro

OfN

OO UJo a:o <• LUo ac </>

< UJo

co zUJ <i

CO _J »— COCOCOi-h O COCOCOCO CO oioict:

Z QDQQ 1-1 UILUUJ• I- < ZZZ? Q H-h-H-

co X OOOO UJUJUJCD Q OOOO Q 2TZ2"

O *-* UJ UJU.IUIUJ UJO UJ J— COCOCOCO h-O 3 CO CO &&<J>O • 15 Z) rororoOco i— —3 ^-trOvom ~3 —H^-t-H• a; »-• Q ro-ocNJfNl Q r-4^-<<-t

ouj z < maimer1 <r 0001— z> or~-r^>t (Nic\i<NUJ U_ -^st^TfO LL OOO

•Z UL O COCNJCNJO O OOOZ Q M-OfMO OOOO CO C>(N(p-rO CO OOO

aCOO Z Z m^-^ro Z • • •

a o o o -ho^o^'H o 000oi o »—• •—

1

• • • • 1—

1

or «0 I— »— OogCMO K-UJO • < < <O t-« 1—

1

t-i

U-O > > >LL UJ UJ UJ M HitOOO o

—tCMroO II II OO 11 11 II II oz a: cc ccD < < ~*c\iro>d- < =»=«*:%

Z O UJ o o o< QiXO Z Z Z UJUJUJCC I—Z < < =»%=«:% <L OOOO ^iO< f- h- I- zzzZ OZI— CO CO U-UJUJUJ CO <<<

LUI-.C0 _J_I_J_J (— I— t—INh UJ UJ OOOO UJ COCOCOm o<o x x zzzz x •—••—••—•

h- h- <<<< I— OOO

124

Page 132: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

3 U' t-5- to ocHH (-* o •

M 3 Z to<r i£

o zo o o •

t-4 _l a: 21or u LLO •

O00 z2 OO »-« X Ot-» 0^* H- »-

t- H-l 3•-. u 2: ST00 uj t-i OO c* M CCO- Q.

00*< LL

z -j Z*< C* O

•-•03 <-# zhOO H-* —

<

<XUJ •-.M- t-HHZ to* 00 00OOUJ3 O* UJ <

2: o.# h- UJuj x * <O0O0|— z* zOCZ"-* 0* 1—

1

K-«

UJ02 •-<«• Q a:>HH k--M- cc (J<H-O0 <r#ac<rz t-*H-30 O0# O

o»-« * zQUJI- _l# Q »—

1

UJ < <-«• »—

1

Xooz> I-* on y-

ooq: Z* (3 a.—Ii-hUJ 0*OH-OO M-M- 2" z

t~tcO •-*)$ HLLQO al# 3OZ 0* »—

OQ X* a:ZOlii *O H- z*t-i>-< 3#J— CD_J o#< UJ z#-J a: *:*3 a:

-1< 2

3UJ 0lXH- u.

c

00a:UJ(-

00aLUJh-UJ

00ZoH-<00

u_a

a:UJXa.

OO

co >tr- mr- ro

m >oCM cm

sO mfH mOO m

A AI i

>j-

in

>i- CM<r in

00• •

00r- mCM CM00 CM

^Hs0 v0

O >tin

CM h-in ^00 m• •

in COin min (Mcm o>r*- 1^

>* -4-

CO00O O

X

<CL

O

H*<r*

UJ*>*ex:*UJ*00*CO*Q*

QU)>u:00COO

O^

oH-O0

OO

UJ_J 00

00Zo

<K00

U.oUJz.<

oo

o oo o

000000

O O OO O O

LU <f ^t fH

O to O <f r>-

z cc O r» CNJ

t—

1

< UJ • t •

<* h- h- v*- in v000 LU CNJ vO h-t—

1

ST >t ro >tQ —

1

O

O O OO O O>t m ro >tCX) -^

O >t <N >0

O OO OO OO OCM O v0• » • •

CO CO CNJ 1^-

<f —4

in in min

>o c\j o P"-

>r c\i <j> r-C\| CNJ ~4 CNJ

^ 2:

O UJor c\l < H-U! CO zX OO OO UJ 21 <a. OO Uj z _J a:»—

O c 3 O OO- ST 2: O X 2:

^ cm ro

12 5

Page 133: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

CO*z*o*1-1*

H-*.-;*CO*c*Q-**

z*o*•-<*H*<*I-*CO**

LU*co*<**UJ*>*<*OT*H-**O*

Ui*CO*o*_l*o**

U-*o**

Q*UJ*I-*<*-I*3*o*-1*<*o*LU*££*O-*

QcCooo

OT

UJCO*-«

o

3

<

a:

X a»- H32: 2:>-. aivl CC< LL-

CS

h-co toLU <\— UJ<

CD

OO f.

cc

a

oa:

O

1/1

Q

COzc

<I-co

OLU2!<

z

<i-

<fr

CO <J-

oru •

K- 0>

LU r-ST (\i

CO

>0

CMCO inor co

LU •

1— ITl

UJ Lf>

2: mf\i

1^

^

CM

COcoo

O O O O O OO O O O O OCO 00 CO CO CO CO COr*- p- P^ r- h- r- (*-

in m -^ -^ —J• • • • • • •

-0 s0 in in CO CO in^H -^ -^ —i m

CM CM ro cc\ 00 CO m(Nl C\J ^ ^H CM (NJ mv0 O 0> 0> 0> s0

>t vO CM ro ^H mm -^ CM CM -^

CM iH m C\J >* en in

A1

A1

A1

A1

A1

A1

A1

-^ CM cm m ro ^t

00COCM>r

>*

p«-

o

COf-<t•*

0>ro

ror»O

O<COCOcoo

CM

o>

CM1—1

CO

o

in

<fo>•

COincm-4-

r»-

o

2:LU

UJz3Q

CO

inocomo>

COroCMCM

CO^00CMCM•

aoincmOr-o

ox

CO co co

LUK-

vf -H UJ^f .—1 2: •

00 CM co• • CC

CO CM UJ ^-

t- 1—1

^ LU• • X vO

2: 2: t

00

OCM00 CM

• -HQ O •

OO O • •

II II

COZO

II II II

or CO LUO

a: a: zIX u <lLU 0. 1-

CO a:X CC HH a\- Q or3 ex cc2: CC Q LU1—

t

LU •—

1

z M CC LU >< < X O O-X h- 21 <

_J 3 -J < or2: < 21 < h- 3

t- 1—

1

H- co OO M O »—

1

Om H- < h- O <I

126

Page 134: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

UJo 00

D 2 a:-* < LUcc h- K-o OO UJ

a

•4- CT> r»

CM ro in^ >3- >t

O vf f«-

O r- CM• • t

>*• in ^0CM •o r*sf ro »*-

«-H v0

<#h-*<*# oQ# LU •

* > UJ ooO* cc _1UJ* U.I o»-* 00 2 •

o* co <r 2:UJ* oa:* t

a:* oo*o*

r- <* CM 00-^ in «+ 00.—

»

in CM oCM ro in >ti—l CM o CM• • • •

in m o CM•4- m ^H

inin

in

o cm O h-»r CM o> r-CM CM i—

t

CM

00

6I-<I-oo

LL

oUJ

<

^ X.o UJ

cc CM < h-UJ CO 23X O0 O0 UJ 2: <rx 00 oo g; _j ex:

i—

i

o o 3 o cQ. 2: 21 Q X 2:

127

Page 135: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

Xl-# K Xz* X UJ HUJ# 2: O0 a:2T-M. t—

1

«

K-Jt ivj 3 5?<S># < *X# O 2!->)* o o OOtf t—

1

_i cc<# a: o U-# o

o->#ULJ*

<X*<»< r ox# i— H- 2To# 3oo# 2" 2!

1 # »—

t

Ol~# M a:oo# < LL 2<*U-'-S-

-JttO O*o z>*x t-H

ce#»- H#UJ 00 (/)

oo^s: uu <~Z.Hr »— 111

C#Z <H-l^-O 2 O»— *«-• K-

<

K-

1

t-Hfrl— O a_C/>-W-< a: OO-H-X aa-H-c? o

•h-uj o Oz# Zo#x; a »-i

«-<#o -< X!—•«••-« cc \~

<#K o CC1- *•-« nOO-H-O 2- z

n-x: h-uj#o n QOO-frO »—

1

0L# CCuj.fr> O>*CD<l*ix*H- ##

Q-M-UJ-H- C/)

oo-fr 7*

o# O-Itt •—

i

o* r-# <

u_# 1-o# V)#

Ztt U_o*.-.»•

»-* UJ<# 2:_J# <X* zO*-l-fr

<*o* I_)

00

O0

CCUJ

00a:

o^-

o

r- r- O O CM CM O—

1

~4 r- r- <-* ~H O0> nJ" >i- h- r» >t

0^ <r\ rO 00 eo co00 00 —

1

1

O co• • • * • • •

CD 00 J- «* <f 4"-^ —

'

r-l »-i CM

cm CM co m 00 00 en(M CM —^ <—

1

CM (M ro

v0 O 0^ c^ CP a> V>r O CM CO r-^ com i-4 CM CM —4

(M >-* co CM <r co in

A1

A1

A1

A1

A1

A1

A1

^ cm cm ro m

CMinin

0^00^^oo

inCM

CO

•4"

inin00

I*-

• t • • <3 U3cr CO CM 00 O cch- nJ- CM CO -0 <CM <y> r-t CM » UJ00 r* 00 CM CM CL 00

-* < UJvO vO v0 -O

00UJ

z<

O 0> fj> <t OO _J h- 00 00 00O CM in 1—

1

O 0000 00 00 00 ccccccCM 00 O r- Z oqdq •—

1

!UUJUJin «* in H • h- < zzzz 1-hH00 r» CO 00 X ocoo LULUUI• • • • O a OUUO 2-2:2:

in & 00 00 »-H UJ UJUILUUJ LUin CO in in UJ l~ O0o")O0O0 1-in <T> cm CM 2 00 00 o^mCM CO <f & • X X COrHsOr*- r» r*- f- 000 1— —> f^-r-000 -3 O^rOCM

O O •cc 1—

t

O f-minco a mr^ro>! <f * Nfr OUJ

\-

uuX

<Li.

HCOO-0^CMOOm-^ooaj

<LL.

inroocor- invOvO^-

• 2: U- O cj^vOCMin O cMcsjr-2: rOfjMnco 000

00 coocm^ 00 000CCOO 2T z O>tmN0 z t • •

O a ^•-omcM 000cc —

1

1—» • # • t t—

4

cc «o t- 1- —*cMCMO h-UJC • < < <

1—

t

»—

1

Hu-o > > >LL UJ UJ UJ 11 11 11

O Oa. —(CMCO

^ . 2: a 11 11 O a II II II II QO UJ z oc a: CC

CM < 1- X < < 'HCMCO'J- < *fc*5*fe

co z a uj a O00 00 UJ 2! < a.xo -L_ z z UJUlUJ00 00 z -J CC l-Z < < =*fc%=*fc=*fc < OOOO O X O a iiX< H h- h- zzzSI 2: Q X 2;

UJ1-1OO00 00 UJUJUJUJ

1

1—

1

1

00

Xrvji-t UJ UJ <J2<J3i2lS> UJ 000000-H CM CO >t in 1_><Q X

h-X zzzz<«< X

»-CHI II 1

128

Page 136: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

LUUl

CCcD •

LU zQ a—«

Z hhH <

)--

q: oo•Ozo: ai<a: U!HlU ClQ<IUJ QiCC-i oO a:

zz a:»—<<t LU

OOOOOOQ-Q-Q-O-a>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

X\~

LU XHI 2TX

lulu a: >-h|—

O0> C2 hOD •

ort-i ^ uj <x2Too •

LUh- ZZ. O mZW>CJ O OhvlOZ<< z: z q:<hc •>

a: ex: c/> :*: *-* < j— •-•

I— U.1 LU Si^t-tt-K -J LL 00 OL'OOOhH

C2 CD C • LU 0<0</";LUi-i <t 00 _J • U-CDD-Ol/) hi X Z O LU Q.OOC CC • H- O Z O COZjo <oo • «x hH • < z: llujozCJ >ZO0 O02 h-00 < HI-hO

LU CZ 2!h-i h-tLU Q I— • XXI— h~

a:_J >mo Om oo_j lu 0000 o.a.<i—Dm sih-hH ,_<<; co > >-*a: 5:s:i-<

ll sihij- »h- clz a: olu ooooi-2: ZD00h-00<O < UJ h- CJCJ CO

U!< DCWZHh Z .CO QLU • U!Q-h- Q-OOOOa^ 2QZCD LU^UJUJLHLOmo<r lu a.h-i t3 olu<to cc oxxacooO IZ I— LU Z>»-h DZZ(-+4Ua:

ll i—3z:<^lli j*ia:ous «/>»-< >lu0> 03ha;l lu<x < (- 11 11 <>a:zz

CO • II ZOoOLLIh- LLLOari— LULUO0 CL"

Z Q ^Z > OCO rUM-«-»h-a:crrO<a:oo :*:z< II OZ 11 ZQfMcM h-Qc:ai_J lui-i(—<^uu 20c: at: i-H u_< rorou. luo< _jh-<OSH | iOl > lull -» Ol-Q Oil cC\— O<QcQD(-IZ <t- coOlu<\I • loijj—— OUJOCO »Z_i >-n h^u.w 5: _jrOQa:»-<a:toooo olui—o<ZDodLu »»ll 000 iocco zujdzinnzoz zOLUi^STCDLLLL O ZUIZ^OCO O0 <T< 1-1 2"<u.UUOlU_J|— r-i OOLULU CD<WOSQ<lLCQlMhJlOI<Z—120 So: LU2 OLUXLULUOOI— J—OOOI—LUHOLu<rz3Z"OLu<h-» xxozoozocx •- •»c£oo>-«z ooZDmZZZO i~zlu< x ——o<o< II II

CCcC>— -XhH< •• t > •OLUC/0LLf\|(MZ:uU Qoo3:oh-h-ZLu—00 11 luck:—zx<omm _j_joozooLLLLQCt-HQLOO X>tZ XLU(M<|— LU 00«^<(N

ujs:c<LUh-—o-»h-oom 2:2:—•—-it-.h-h-m mzzh-xzlux sihH^ co lu 11 z>2:2:cx-cx-og«u:lu<OO O h II OK~ II O-h LUOOrNlMOOh-h-UJk IU»-h»-i5: »QO UJh-«(M IDQI << XHi— OtMt-HhH || —cc:oO|—<UJOZ|- h- LULLCD II II LULU -Z. •»

a.o-tt>a.cx. ir\h-io<t—xzmz iou xxs-h-^s:O0U.2.0O-. »Qai-ZI-<SD II Y~ » —-»l— I— ~42:cM

SI meg > oOX •• O —

^(Ncm ivi ivi

11 11 xi 11 11 •oo-» «o 11 -* u— 11 rsjcvirom 11 11 < <cm rorn lu lu

Z —'-DO hH * *H-—OOOOhHhH (vjQ QZh-MNNoia: <^ egZ>00O<<OO<x'LLrNl ivl

OhHOU-CQZLUa.hH< <oqi—ooooluolu lu

oo^ououuuoouuuuouououuouuououuuuouuouoouuuoou

Cla.0.a.Q.Q-

CJ O.CJ Cl

Q.

u z a.a

hH a.

CJ h- Cu< CL

CJ 1- Q.

00 a.CJ a.CJ LU 0.

CJ in O-LJ CJ CC (XU CJ LU a.

O > Q.O CJ < 0.a CJ CC CL

CJ h- a.CJ a.

CJ LL Q.CJ CL

• a.CJ a.

CJ zo a.• CJ ox Q.z CJ hHh- CLh- 1— U.J Clon CJ <2: Cl

_l Cl 00CC xz Cl zh- CJ 00 ClZ _|M Cl hH

-H < <H- Cl h-<r X CJ CJ< Cl -»

<_>>}• CJ X Cl z> 2:00 CJ 0:0 Cl HHhH DO OLU CL LLLL i«i <^ LL a. UJh- u CJ 2T Cl Q< LU Z « 20 Cl

2 X < <hH Cl LUE^H CJ 0:1- Cl _l

Z <-< CJ Ot-

a. CO

O 2; u co 00 Cl <O •k > a:z Cl hH> m • _i Q.O Cl CCz «l 2: l-ZJ CJ CJ Cl <

hH <x < —1-3 CJ < Cl >H h- 00 > Cl00 • • •• CJ COCO CLhH hH Cl-J ecu.) CJ 00 Cl

OH- CJ OOZ Cl2: x< CJ hHO Cl

<t CJ l-O Im Cla. X CJ h-H ClO < CJ hH aO CJ OO Cloc O Cla.

CC

-5

CJCJ

a. CLClCla.

0—— •>*• >t —0-»(NJ»>t^"-"~-~ ^- (Nlro

f^w—»LULUO ^ -mCJ >QQZSO ^1- +•*

t-H 2:hHt-H<t<uj l-Z—l-O •SLcCcC-Z.~Z.ee <xooax DOOh-CtM hCZZ00 OZLU00HC 0OCJ<<

129

Page 137: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

>>>>>:>>>>>>>oocoo •> >>f— H-.0-»0> «— to •• ^"O>0^- OONt-

OOH > Or-*Z >D2 v0 • »r0Z V.usz > hs:< »z>>~ Ml. '» (—! >HUJ > ocz)i— >r^orom >3-rM—-a: z

OO <2: > OO00-Hn0 ••2— -moa 2:OO UJ zi— > Uj •J-, 2I XCC2I O ivi 1—

1

X>oo X nOO > O^OD-QOh 0— <r-^ h- 00OO \- QD > -r-4 ZHtUCL UJ2U-CZ: <00 e" -5 > 002Tqc: -2"Z> -CD o:Oou! K *voo UJ Q Od > c\ir>o—o-oo-»o mZ H- 3 Ooo H- z o< > rvjO>OrO •> ••"t' 0<2Td Q. O2: z> <r > <r »ro •.««vo—» •• •.fM •• 2! O5: z to > UJroZ^-3-Osi st H^Nk O •

• t—

"

X QUJ > ^-<s0--'r0'-'N0 q-<m<2: O f-I

0. 2: I— c\ii-« ct: > 00IVI •" M * o<^iu« •> Xz>=*fca:< > i-t<o«-'n««-2:m +-i X -H

z •» 2: US > fs| •>v0h-a:>-cD<— _J—'O •» H SI< UJ MQ > <omcoo<05: Q(N— a: Z)2: UJ IVIZ2TO0 > UJhZmUJI-Om OONINJ h- 2Ja: as a: <<|- 1 > •»XZ)CL _! •>Q- "->ii:<r0 < »

\~ Z)H > "DZ •—-UJ— CD o<uj 2: Xu_ 3 UJ D-i OO > •—^^o^ •» x •• **• O

Z a H LU<t > rg »o>3"w ».s0—

»

orM2I2 u. O< n ct:=ttxui > m%j-2:>oo— "*" •"^-Hl-Nl O Oh- Z O H—

J

> ~~rnO t-KM-^vO a: »tni< •

< • I- 00 > oofviz^'t^m^ •» a:—i<u_ 00 OOQ * U-ZU-U. > m< •-co 2:^" UJ^UJO _J XZU< z 0000 > <t M— <IZ«~COn0 * CM •» •> n O0

h- Olli <r •—

> CDJ-D> XO- Q—»Q-H <r nr>oar n ZHZZ > Oro2! —<U5: h-m'-n h- OCLUUO Q OdOO > 00 »(/)Mt/)>tK «-0 ZT -MO XUJ OZo^UJ < MU)MM > z »^nr«s|ti«^_jri •" =5>t<< nQ 1-11 CH HOl-l- > O Q<QO0LU>— O— UJ OH

"•»

<r<x<< > n (\| « OOOQfl ouj «-2: l-l- V.UJZUJ UJ -J 1—

1

> H- C"0<\|c£l— UJ KJC •» -2:0.2; <z O0«J5 O DZD3 > < — i-in »c£:—o<t- <<l— UJ 2Tn OZ Z Z OutO-O > C£ to rvj U_ psjn (NJO s0 \—ZTZI— ac O<ruj<r < —IUJ2!_I > <Z M<N<Qm •« Zl-3 h-Q. •IHI •X <so< > _J < ~<a: •» -i«— D00OQ X OUDUZU OH-00 > O u_^ » ^^,x»— O -OS OO S0

z <t UJ > UJ U(\j-U(mdd5: O— ••UJ. iZ mo^iHciMa: a:cac£a: > »m<m -rnoo:cD *^-inj- UJ ^OIDOO OO > r-H<ir<")n HO » 1—1^-^ « 300U. u_<u. LLUJLLLL > UJ >. » NwW(J— »f\| •—

zz >o•• cc • O > _l ^l— <tO0 •• •• 1— 1— -rr\J =3< r<1

UJ UJ ujOujz:ujld > CO 21 (Nil— LLO-^-»^ z:<it:ro UJ •^ 2 <Zu.lZOZZZ<ZZ > < D 00O0n 2T CM (\| <3 dh- •> 002: z> H»-<11jm(-mOh|-hm > n QMMQ<fO(<l » OW-w z X. Zv <l-atl- h-OH 001— 1— •>

e£ OQ ro «-Ln2: <h- 0 ODODQ3lilDwD3 > < 2n •• »t/)2r*~ r>—^^*"» • . »|.v| aiM 1- V.Q 1OUJOZOWCQOD > > O——<O <t£X 2: »t l-tM< 2: z OO 1-ctoocoa: ca cccc > n <M <N _)mQ rvj CD >0 CLw-mcD ••> >—

1

O • Z)CD coocoOcoujcaco > tOfOrOMoOt—< » •" Oh HO oc OO a.DODUJJZJIDJ ;> n <t>—'OOO—«^l 1-— * n a. •X ^:00 1— 00 OOOO <l (/) (— OOOO > Uw*- »o •<J>3-^' oo<uj-» II

m OX 1—

«

> UJOOoOUlQ »v0 2: UJh-2:(NJ • •» *v SQII II II 11 11 11 > ocit-HZnarO— 1— Ooo<ro -lO O 02: 2:

> Q.ci<Qa>-oOw> ••zr H V. 2TZ) X> (j »U_ »**Q « a:—a:— II Z 2 000 1-

> UJZCMmUJDq<Q uj<m-o »i a. Z •* »—

1

CL 00 <i > _JO>Q _J Ouj od 2: 0— »tvi 3QC X a:00 00 2! Z oar > cd »2" .-coxctrcxr UJ2T2!<: D.O. < <o51 SI Q < >oo > D«ruD aoh HUHCQ2 h- 1-0a a q: |~ X-J > OfNlDrsJO—«2 »«O0 ZUJZZOD. u_ u. < <o _i1- ^Ji^ >

>>>

•«•«•)«• «*•»«• *«•«•«HH .

fr

<

>>

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OO OOOOOO OO OOo

130

Page 138: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

UJ2"

<rzLUXh

LU

a.

ooooooooooO 00 0">O —i <M <? CO C<) >3"

>0^ sQ sO <0 •-o -o ^0 »o ^0 t—i

UUUJUUJUJUiUJUjUJUJH- h- 1- I— 1-H H- H- h- I—

a: cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc3333333333

UJ z> <

UJh*_l»- *»

»-Hl_) Xu_<r 1—

cc OOO<UJ ?-zhi" MO<z MH-t

UJ Oh <h-00 t—

1

ujo: >> -oooolu CD CO ooa:> zo_uj<r << H-

1

>cc h-H 1—

Z

<h- << O03a: QO <rol~Q UJZ

UJ OCc£ *:ZOO UJUi •a

UJO (-h o ou-Q._J ZZ —

i

zoOO \- UJUJ o »—i

a. X XII II O II II o

cc—CM ""

*

ooooorH<N "", o

zo in*oi^n"|co o

00 •r ^vr^r-^^ oo >T oz ^ Z CO »—

t

o •^ o ^ Q£•—

I

— vQvO^vO'O »—

t

•a o1- •4" 1- -t0. 0. s:

o wUJ LULU LULU

o —

*

oQ o h-l-l- h-l— Q o< < 1 i> IHHH < < h-Ui LU C^QLCtaCtX UJ UJ LUQt a: 33333 a. cc o

oJ-

oo

oj

O(M

oo

o >*UJrn 1

•o GJ II

UJOH tl—

1

t-i <N Q.>tOOOUJ 1—CUJOIIUD II Q.OOUDZ O-JZ

|| H-l^ CH

oo zo zUJU- oou_ cQm o—j«-« o

ooo uuoouo oo OOOOOO ^i^)<J>{^>(J>(J>

oCM

131

Page 139: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

II

in in lu in in

H -* <t —

|

—i

n ii i- ii n

to_| l-l Wi -^ <—

I

inoo

II 2! 2:H .-» 1—

1

3 3 H f-t

^ ^ it: O O * *:•» •» » •» «» •»

(—0 i—

i

1-^

2T——

'

t-i t-H

*" "* 202"3hh 2:

3** W

UJ UJ rsj dzs: O LLI UJ2: 2: w 33 •* 2! 2:< < i—i *H UJ hOOO 2 <t -H —« <z. 2 > > 2: >-H H g> > > 2h- h- 2: 2: < SIS—-

-

2T P 2: 2: h-00 oo 2: 2: 2 2:3 3 00 2: JT OO

3-^ 3-"H DOhHooO 3-» 3^o •_> o «_• o>- O>oo «*22 -* •» «— o>- o> O •_•

m •* 2: 2!— Hmm 20 in 2: 2! O«"» «» -»s ->Z -.>003'-< —

»

—•2: —S «"^

o o —» —

.

". ID —•^ 3—» — 2!»-<>-m2" O—» —

»

— 3 -*— 3 O —

»

i- o h- o OQ OQ 02 3 CVIfH h- O OO OO H- OON ONOOvO OOvO O^OD II 11 II Q ONOO^O OOvO ON

MOOltl o<Ni(^mvto*i ii ^ooro ii r*- como —1 II 11 Oromm>tro 11 sOsOm 11 O —troom-n om>—th-in—

i

Ntn-H r- r-H -»— ——

>

OinnMnn Nin-H Oin—

»

»

i—« •» fH — <-4 1—< •»—

»

Hi-1 •—»rH 1—» •>«~ 2T— »» —» »..—

1

1—i »-> 1—if—» —

*

-^•h —

»

CO -^ *co *• OO «. «K/) * 00 <N<Nif\iar2: —

«

OO OO » »vi <-* ooQ.O sOUJ OliJOOLUw v0v0UJt-<-O sOlilbO </>3<\l<\l vOUJsOOUJ'-' n0*ouj»-< vOUJOO^H oo c\l a a DS— —SIQ m 0. O O O «t Oo«4- w vO — a —~n0 ^- w. *^ w—_ wsO —•

JH « — • w <^ — «—t—02:000 II »,»,«•* ~- t —

i

*UJUJ O UJLU UJUJ OUJUJ OUJ UJ OOO -*<NC UJU5 UJU! OUJUJ DO LULUHvOZI-ClK ZI-QKI-CMh-l-QHt- I—O—ILULUUJ_lHh-t-h- ZTI—Ch-KQm(-hQm|- ZhQ

••—"<t UJ »t~i<it-4t—«<i(X'-<»-«<iqi>-i'^i—<<i-Jcr;ocai-JCNi<i.<t uu ••—<<i.t-i>-«tcc>-<>~i<iac lu »»-i<i11 ^ 0CUJO3 o:ujQ:a:LUOa:Q:ujO(Xina:uj<i-Ht-tHH<rNi»—h-03 cciuocccuj^cx-aiuJOCDZ) <xlu

Mja:ciZi->2a:32o:z22a:iii2 »3o:uQQCiu<wwozM2oL22ocz22a:uioZM2a:t—iLU •-< i—tt—iI— I I I-—>-< Z. 2 2

oo:u- Oll. Ou. Oll.N2m Oh 0»-« Oh-i

OO

o 00132

Page 140: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

II

—I

»*

on2:<l-00

in

OO

f~4 3 3*: Q O•k •t •»

.

2:— -* 00—

1

-H .—

«

^ 2:02: 2T*» 3—4^ =5m 02:2: Q•—

»

OD •h

LU hDOQ 2:2: >-H .—4

< 2:2:*— ar

Z S3 =3H- DQhl-WQ00 O »Z!Z.—4 ••

•» —h»—1»-«:so->DCDh», -» 2!t-i>-ilr>2:

02: 3 fO>tO 003 11 n 11

r*- corOO ~* 11 11

r» h-^ — -»•-»—>

•O >OLUoo oo3romQ2T—-w—2:0— — Q Q —w—1—02:000 II

LU UJ OOO -H<Nh- h-0_JLULULU_J>tl-»>-1-1—>t-K _j cc cc cc —1 rn<< luC£ in C£ LU< 1-4 »- *-i<NI—I—33 »3a:00000<o0o02:

l-Ulz:3ozo«-«

oo

00LU_loz:<OLU>LU00CDoLUoCCLUCO2.3

LUX

<LUa.

3Oo

oomi-omzit\i-i_j

»tf)U>0UJQ II

<

UJ h-t-ozhh<3a:LuoJccu

00LU_Joz:<OLU>CCLUO0cu

OLUX

O<LUCC

CM00 >-

33OO•» »2:00

33QD C2:•» *• -^-^

^02: 2-2: -^>--^.—

4

33 >2:2:2: OO 2:2:33 2:3QO w— 3

(M Q •» •• Q-4•XL -4Qc\|h- 1— OO >-

—>^>2:z:-h — 2:—

»

— 2:2:2:MMZ —. 5-

02:32:003 03O 0-0303it—41—iC 0*00O —•mo c 1 mm-O sO-l — II II II m—• 11

oCO

o

3-4 Oo «—

o

O • i-» •—1«—* II —

1••

••(—LUO * »-O0 CC -»—.—. *V0—^Ol— t— -^n0 OLUoOOO<-» nOLU

«»—t LU I UJ 02:2. 1—*—•!—i (__>•—

4

II OXU3 —3— QQM «—

hSOZh z: —1—0 —*-— —*—4-1 1-1 UJt-iUJ —

»

LU— »- 11 h-h-i-o_j-j O2:ooi>-o<u-;O Z: mZh<JJOOOOh<QDoil o<Nc£Oa:Lu<<z:z:z:z:c£:LUH-z:—t»-i Uid2U2o:oo««2o!:wH

oo

oo

00u<jxj><j><~> 00000

oCO

oa*

oo

133

Page 141: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

in

toZC

COOQ.

LU <O 3T »~CM -H —1 <* co—i >- > Z

r-l in s i-4 s: m QC < zr-l

•̂»

y >• 2:3 3: 3

V- 1—<

3OO^ O •4- QhS 0-< O w Q Z

IX' t~ OCNI l<£ >3 > 1- i H-) I *:o 1 OO -»2:a -.2: «* H-2: O Q -H —

*

— 2: — 2: OQ z—

«

3 LU< Oh 1 ' - 03+ or> Oh- f- O a. XH- z Z OO O OvOQ OnOO z ZON z H00 —3 3-< m m ^m cor*-m — z> 3inr<-> •—

1

»-i Q — -H vO vOh 11 i-iin-H 11 OOr^ I LLC —to • •H r_( *. O—< » QHO O —1 •• K O

H »»— 1x1a .—

1

•» ••CO"—O »-c0-^ h~ i -CO < <£. 000000O Z • II HOhh >o sOLU t— >OLU Z • II —

H

OUJ 1— »-H CO O^rsjro^in•—

30 •1—

1

UJ I LU (_)-( Dm -JO Q <l a: _l 000000a. OLUO II CHOZ) *-3 ** II

*"* QLUZ IIw a. t—

1

_!_!_, _| —1 _l

th- hh30Z»-i -• z WW WW O •»-- w 1 <z »—

1

»—

1

LU»-<LU COLU z HH LU \- 2: H ^0 ^o >o -o ~o >oLU IIH-IDUJ «~ H- II II 1—1—f-Qh-Ml-DQai II l-OLU J-OLU => X LUX 0-OX>0 z mZM<i^QM<or) aoDo t-xtZ) a. H QH OOOZ^LL a-tma:OQiUiMOa:uji-zzou ZsOaTLUZ z H-

«

H I—li—tt-H u^^2o3a:D(-2a;w •-•h- h-i^H2oCM •—

H

cc »- LLILULU U.JLULUQ Z~ h- »-Z«~ 1- h- Z H-h-H-K-h-H-< 3 Z zr> z z O »—

1

1 11 it—1»—it- it' 1

LU OLL OO OOU- OO JJF _J a: ot:a:a;QiaLQia: Um

Om

UUh

>*

uo

in •0

LU <t Q. 333333

0000 000000000

134

Page 142: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

< t/) «-*

h- • to ••

OO — O ~•• -h z <~ w < i_

l-H I/) •* Z— w CD — 3O Z CM O

in »-i < i^ oa: » w wUU ^ o o

II — Z Z— s: < <t

^ — z -» —o < in cm in <•—• •> •> ^ •> h~a:— -* -h — —• z

— Oh —.m Q 3 -»Z— — || o II c

—t »t/> mo 2: o m1£ -»0 ~0 iH < —» -H w •»

o •• muj -hz ^ * it: q 1—

1

P-l-> QC < —« CM O

—• -*•-« 11 » •» m i£ z 11— no -* •• <o —1+ p-iw —» -h — —» •• .-4

I— LU *£«-» ^ — II — ^s: *•-< -^ -^ 1—1 o »h in

0<l —»—» „ ^ ^ i«£ O j£ •»»OZ ^"51 II » * H * "*

\— ^O —

»

w ^ « V) M II -»«"*V3 ••LU •—

I

i-H •" >—

•-•a: ^i*i o w ^ — — ^ fhro— —•*-« ^ » Q * •» i^

LUQ •—» h- OLU ft CM LU -» *• •• 5" •> -HM CO 0>X w :*: X —< st

or <t—» i<i » —»< lu < ^uihh zh w » —. z 2: w or - *•• >—— cm Ooc < -*a: ro~» 00O LU— i-l »—1— Z \~ CMH w--»uj

t-i wO 2TLU q: </) LU<2IO »LU <2Z w O— H- •-• Ow 211—<

•m t-Hoc z< o — a k- <zzQCCM H-« H-Z K — — ZDhO-h ~»Q 00»— 00 — O. ~- — O HOW

^H t •. •> «/) i-if-i o h- OO OOOQ. vOO O-* <—w q O>0 ZOO -O wwwOcm 00 r-i-« l -* 3 >1" in -»—« <

-»o — ^h o«— —.—«-^—»—,«^-»-^ —» ._( o <-t—•—( —

(

«"»0«-» —

»

_l • -HCM QUI •• O -HCM--4 —« » I—O »<?LUC H— OOOOOOOO OhZvOO ••-^ »»^ » OO O00O OsQ^LUj—h- -0< O000>O—»CMr0«$- inZ • CM —I *Ow^ • CM ^ »c0 OO «»-h UJ J— OOO—<i-h-h^^h f-H3 *^CM + < Ul— cm —I— >-t OMil QCOZ)— 00 —t^-H-H-H-H-Hr-l HUa II wQw Z ~»<IpH r-t

•* mSOZ • »»»#.»»•. »Ot—LUC »-t I— tLUO *•!— - *-0»-i hhuj-» >0-O^0-Ov0-O0>0 nO Zt— h- 1-1 LU«/)LU »— K- vOZ^O >0w >_^_»_LU H Z3t-* LU II I— H-UJI-H LU Z> LU—O Z»-iw3wwwi ^www w OoCODO M*»MDao:03-0~D-

qoll. Occ^z -^ CL02(JzoNa:Na:zo20z o zUJ—«h-i U2h 1-1LULULULU LULL!LULU rHLUH- »-irM^2^3i-i i-uIwU;mUJt- hhl-hl-t-hl-l—hZ- h- I HI-tOhHI-HH 2? > <>~"1| l> H (Hit |r> ><fm^ ^* ^T* ~*| t CQfc»-< ^* *—

<

ccc oaccC-u-occcocalccGcxiZjU- 00 cu. cixzaco:2Q 032523J22I-30H OO On U2<2US# « «• *

O O OOOOr- ex) a> o <-• cm—< -* ^ (\| CM CM

to-**—O»-<

H<Z>OU.I

1

z>-H

H-1—

1

O Ulz 00LJ cc

1

LU>

> <CD

1

a:1-

H00 zZ5 LU-3 O.

< C O1- << 1 LL

1

LU O>- ZD z=D a. aQ. 2: MZ HH-

1

1

<-1

»- s 3z X OI—

1

h- _)

q: -i <a.

aOLU

z _j XLU < 1-

000000000

135

Page 143: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

VVVOOzo

>3:

T.3O

CO

•> 3^ O

<-» > •»

at Uoo s: rvl

i-H 3 <—o s: Q ••

^t =3 •» OoO<N c 1- O-^

* 3 >3IO s: 3: -31- .—

i

—1 DOcc ar*-*—

«

IVJ O •.-»-»

oo 3 < .-..-. XXOvO DDZ QQ HQS

-» rn *?—tf-« ZOOmm fNJ^-H^•~»2* orz <x> >33!3-

—> < h33 1- w^. TODDen 3TOQ 00 1 1 3: »oo^O 1 3 H-t X> DC)>o C—

Ql-K\l«H(N|Or-»wwom»— 1- •• >->H-|— >>- ~3:

cr

O

3 O

O Q hh t-HSI»-«*-i3:>-i>330a333: »hmZ31 O »— + »ivl NmQQD -QO 003100033 \— 2 (—< <NmmQ-Q + + DNMMQ2 ^ 3a:_i < o 11 11 11 11 o<*- O QC-*-. Ohi • 11 II 11 II Uh-X X>- || II IIOO UJ OU. •— U) —•—»00-»—»

—»— --UNsO »— <N<N -Ml— H- -» -*-*-».-.^, 2:2: -»-*—.o>->CO -» »-i -(<DD OO O h-ih-O3 *-"•-<< 00 M5T3"

•.«—w ss mji-imm <_> 0000 z!3:>-'»--t^-i<r;3:-1 -HUM »-i»-iUJ O || >-~«— ^«-<Ci 33OOfNJ NND-'t^ww- x II II I—a:—^-^- II OO

II »-H«-'Mt-i»-«Z O ZUX> OOOO

3-

3

<— ai

a: •<-»

ooc\i a:

^00 3:^-5UJZ II 0»-«o mt^iu.

-U!tU< II II c£<\i<»-.O II Q.K 3 i-«

O OhZOQQu._ia;— h-^xxo_JUJ 2:<H-LL OOO"-"*-^ OO

omf\i

<a. O3:oo< <<x>»-i»-( qzwo: 11 11 ai(— ivi_jrNliNjiviH-J»— »- OOCCCX-J-Jrvli^ivli-i 3z<j<«iojjjrzooJJ«<^QD200<U-LLU.-^<UJUJ3 3U^2<<CQcD<£l^J00•-,

OOOOOOOUOQWWUUUOUOU<X>|-zoo

o oinC\l

00oa.

00

UJ00

UJ><ex.

oUJ

<_l3u_l<oUJccQ.

o

UJo

a.

AAA

o<NI

oMil00O—«oo<^

oO »sO^O

til CO

• —*—1 ujujc •

•^t-t»-« UJooci£x:03—

'

UJ<220Z• mO.'

ooo

Q.U.03

o

uuouu

136

Page 144: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

Z?<r»-«—

«

• - OCDQC>-< — 000~ HH "»—" •»

• Z</> «•* 0—

.

o 1^ Q H-.Q_ < r-« c:i-

<M — CO CC ozmo O z:z>O *m, « •» z or1

-* »-H i-H— 0a: -w II r-4 X ».«'

o 00 r-t—

'

****** m 2:uu rvl ^s: in»-< •TvJ

•• < •Jvl •->-» -H<—

,

U_ -»<r -HOO II C£<N O ^cc II M —10 —

w «. KiO *H< *: * inD —

*

*. •» ^CO —

^

•*

t-H t—• m— O ~»a «-» 00—

»

a: «—

>

— > i --» •» -•1- H ||

o 2: LH«- r^—* ^z on 2Tr-l

z M 2TO *:*-* *ZD !—

1

Di:•» < 0<M «»w QO O 2! - **

«-. LL <^Z< i-<5: H-O >t 3 »—

»

in O CNIh-CQ wM 2— rn O 2:^ <•» » OOO m<t DC * 2Tii H-

f—

t

—» O— 21 CD OM 2: LU •• zii t—

4

h- -<f- o<o o< —1— -^ K--J-

pH <— in:*: -HZ •» — CO 2: •»^-«' c*: a 0^: * mcc-> UJO f-OQi =5 OLU•» ivioo m H-r-t 2: ZOO O 2:2-— <o —i<i Ow— <^ O vO •» U!< wfH u_m— X h- »o z^: a—

m

O h-Z^ o 0-* inrvl a: - z ^H *»f-<n H-

•ft ODNh Oi*:< ot— in a:< 2_——inoo <CM mi— (—o— O CO ro—^i sj— O ^--t aw ^ Zr-lO —O ro •> » »t -0 1 OO 2! •> »r<*)t—i 1

UJ »03 •*-• —» •» in— O<"0 -r-i r^vJ-inrvJMLL.

21 >toa-oci: o<i- O^o OZZW oo2!2:^^<<ro< ^ O O OHi^ 1- H- H-<<< OD LL.

JH.-H. -» z ~U' KO « —»r* -J _iao-.~. 1»-'>^

ho —

»

• z^nm 5 0+ »M M Oooo IS>\- —ILUUJ 3 * 000 O (-< <^-—oooo »—

t

&o*t —Z o Zl— 00 - f-O a:_j f\jro< 11 i^j

rNiror"- 3 OsJ • • t-lr-tLU *» —o«— — t-H t 11 -hl- <pH—|r-» OslO 0:^3 —'»—

1

HQ UL zZHrHM— u_•>•«•» O HOIM3QZ • •— rH •."-!—» -HMCOIT, —HOOHHM •• *>*&. >—

»

<o-o>oo oo ooooo •» i-i •» • •—

oujc -OcCQ «< 2TOOs0-O -HOCD r»-o ro^m-o-H—i sO — K UJ»— HI • Ol- • JJLL! + o«-» »-H II

«»»«^WC\J -hcni OOOOM + h- z ui «Kiot:uj UJ«-U»Z O II NN3 a: I1»,. <- II

—t-H ^-« -^ ^-t i—• i—1 II—-Q.U- OD ctOD z. 0=3 LU <<Z>-< »-<o 11 II l-l

LMUJUJO •• •» » » •» •• •» K-<it-H o HH OZM2UJZ tLU »-0 • (/") »-" UJLUMONJHK-KI- -0-0 -O ^O -0 "O -O »-i UJ »—« »—

1

1 O <*- K- II II JQLHH<UJ<»—n—1»—

113 LU II II H-— f—'— »— UJ»— K-4CJ—LUt-_) Z -J2:>.'-'h-iLLCX(Xctcccxor)*-*-D'——»—~-o H-« z ZDO-ahWDaNu. u<f in<UJLucx:cx:»-tCO32SOZ 2 (Nvtinoiu- OU. 0Z02ZNZ0<h Oi^^0h-h-33030

•—'UJUJ 1>-• UJ UJ UJ LU LUm^ ii3 i-h O*-" —

«

»—

1

1—H-l— 1— 1—1— 1— 1— 1— 1-^- 1Zmm^—i »—i •—i »-i »—

i

z Za a: a:o cc cc cc cc cc o oll OIL0330332330 Um Oh

•M- •»»

OI

s- 00(NJ (N

OO 000>O -HtM CO -4-

(\im mm m ro

137

Page 145: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

STOCD •»

ODUh

utcr:>x ** a:o_<< O Q- •*

-»—• H-l- Q 33_J_i O *<1.

«»*» OUJLU • o<\JOJ-» OOQ —l OO-~— m+ + i

**,** i—

<

oQtNj -»—• •— «-»—• ooct:~* t-Ht-H* u>to 0>-, »-« * «0

</) OO— mm f- f\im O >h to irzro << en ors •—<•—• —.<—> (—a:ST m — LULU OOCcD l/)<t

3 s: i |Q *» c co ~«- ctia ->O 3 UJ 3T2: (— —UO MM Q »» Q ****cc ^rsi (Niro << H»—3:—•— ——. coma, mm o <t 11 11 sis: 00 z.cc—\**** 5:-.—. —**S—• << O I— COCO <^>iJ> O"-*s: ^ oo+ luui ^«— oa co.3Qsr sros: i-.»-hojooo to — 3 00 —«— o >O'-i—• 3—<r-i acrac-a- H(riQD(/)M 000 ommh o •-<*»*s:s: osrs: oo*q^^nmq oaoo o 11 11 ozw <s:OD3 »33 LUZ— U. MMOLLa: OOOH- -*** + OhO Qh^-ZHQQ DQD MmO«Om££< • • .2 • —.—

.

q »tOO \-"Z. H—s: fh >—«——01— ujluh- olui—hood orcmm -5 1— 000 zdh->ri-"-'—siww— o z o lusts: o mm zz*-> 30s"Q 3 11 LUV.0———3 11 n 11 o lu »coco 11 mui 3 11 11 h oucqqoooot/vOoooooo o: o O 3 00 mr>«—-» + o •> -2:hhcocom .cD(n^x>a.c/) 000000—•—•—• • 2-300-5 2 o ******* h-S"<rM<<sifvJ<<s:oos>-H—-tmoNco - 1— •—*•—• cuMm •»< + 2aci—<oo3<oo3s:s: o mm(M(nc\ihmmmO h-«— i-i-ts —•!— -5-3-5 •»</>

LL Oct: 003~-0*hmmmmm • II Z ZTCOCOLU 3" <r*-»ro »t-i—w ow.^ cooo t— iiw«-w ou. qodod ii3—«—— i— s:s:o ~~o «— \— «n0^o>o^vO m-jo*-1 oouuz o zaco*-* <

I— I— K-l— II II a:«— LU MM(\jrn '-'UJMOHMroaJDoiOQ I—~zzw-zzw a z^-^«— s:s:s:— 1-0 sssdo-juc <»-ti-Hco chi-hco——»v)h- t ocococo zr^o 11 cococo~zoo -o o

</)00<t/)00< QZ LULULULULUOOOOOLI- QmC^ OOOm <\j «•

SMMQSMMQogm H-m-hhi-i-touooM oh-co-soooh 11 _js:s:00 11 a—yt-t*-<*-i*—*-< "Z. ~z. _Jco»-i luoiii 11 11 a: 11 11 11 —^ y-^doLccccccctc DC oh-<OQ- >OO t/> <32322Q OO UZUCCD atQZW OZWQOm 11 LU_|,^_!,-H_J<MC\J<MLULUO ""* t/>_JMMM_lMMM<xc£U-a: CO<<l<L<l<<L<l.<a.Q.Q.i-iCCU_ OOUJUJLUOLULULUSSOLUt-i

oLUH-oLUa:uao

000

00in •0 r-co o>m m mm rn

138

Page 146: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

zw <r. •>

ST •. —

*

O _ <z CM h-< 5<i Z•» w 3—

.

O Ci-4 O Ow Z w

""* QO

< OO

oo 2T —

»

zi—4 —

.

<J m <— SI •. . »

3 -5 ^^^ -h »-» —

»

mC mm 11 m m•» w •» •» !-! •» •.

wS: 1—»—

<

*£ —t ^-t

1—1 O 11 11»• II IIOS < —l-H -^ ^ i-H

o—«-» a: ** ^ 1»£ *cfQ « » *: — * •* —.—

.

O QI —»-^ . *"^ —

^

.

OQ<-<'^ -H—l »—

1

r\j pH ^h QD-•SS: + ** W ^ *: ^ h-»-(N

+2DD • * «« UJ *• •» ZZ#300 -—

*

-t<N ^- w ro <f 0033*—

Q

ww —

1

<r »^^^w- —iOO>•>ww 1—

1

UJUJ z h- LU<ruj NOODH l—» 5-5: w on 00 sth-s: <r s:chH-H-OO w << h- t—t <z< UJ^^3—-zz-h Z2 K w O Z=)Z •• 00

< Ohms: >- h-H 00 HOI- SDQi-ozoco 00 00 00 .-.CL —

»

-^ ooooo HHM +ZZ<MMD h- H-H ww Qh ^».^»_ MOTQi3< ZMQ Z. OOJO 00 <00<M

— II II II 3 < — Z) fMvrm —1O— UJUJT'-M-II 0+ II 1— a r

~r^- ^* ••OO* 0000——.— < OOOOOOo 00 -HOO-H o<o O Xm O

ph^s: •a<— Q vOr^-coc^o^^cM en »<-4 »>0 * (\l MOO CO -H | | OO ZQhhm -^ 1— nO vO vO -O ^~ I""- f— r-^ vOZ-O r~—r^on «* rvl 2"U_ <Tti mo: Zm O >—1 —1 r-^ 1-4 —H —* .—

(

<—* + < rH<J^-<00 <o«Dm 1-o«-»*-»w II 3 UJ •»•»•»*»•»•» #»*» -11 w •»^* •>i— «. • • UJ 00Q co

1 !—' Ow > sO sO %0 »0 -O -O vO i-4 •—

^OZvOOO h- mro_ios:ooui»-tU UJ cc » »—

UJtMUJUJ ID ^»—» ^.««—.—

«

00—10003 !-•=) IIP II 1— an- Z)<—0— 11 II WWoz<zzzzo 11 ooz 00 t—l»-•—*'.z 000^<o<<< "-»,-4 •-•-• CD UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJZ UJ (M <NI OL 21 QC

'

-«UJwU.!X> —trsjOCoiroOO^(-*t-5QK- O l-l-hl-l-l-|-<h«f^303l-l-SI-QQU) <-•mrfiHMOroONz Z H-1 >—1 >_1 1—1 »—1 »-H •—

»

»—« z»-<oi-«2:2-r> i-H—IQ^Of'OO'-H-H—

00 a O a:ct:ct:c^cc:a:ct:--*a:o iDa:Zcr:DDZ 1—

t

* »OOD •> •» »UQ UJ 2J2333:3H2Q (j3E<3O0O0»-« >0>OU!Z -O'O-O

t- H • II

zuj •—w II II ^^«_>—UJ U-J UJ 00CC oz • UJUJX^'-'UJUIU.Ion t—

1

l-l-CiOO|-»-H-1— UJI— h-1—1 5; 5" U_ hh •—• t-1

Z z> a. (x a: Z) z> hh a: ct a:

0Z032WV)Q222

(XQ-

OUL

OO

oo

000

o 000m>j-m

139

Page 147: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

CM •• <—

O

"^lit —

«

-> HI _•

O0 2: •. LU tr\- * •^• —

1

X O Z^* * *v13 OC ^ z Ooo * »)-* u_ »• < mC •«•

DU • m h- KOl « «•

—2:0 •i »—

<

00 HH * «•

•"H_J X t-H coz » «*VPsJO >t X 00 •«• •»

*v<. •» -^ m •^ O-l-H •»• *—. •• -. •« •• 1- * -a-

OO ox a fNJ X «> z<t •«• «-^ • •» H-t z —»- a^ * nt- «• •>*

s: oo-h- cc - m •« 2: H-<O0 # •»

=5 2*0- •ft "»^- • * K •«• •«•

Q O* O X A • •» <TUJ «• •M-

»-.« H m - 1 X »- 00 * *-»+ h~« •a t h- h- o-)cx: * »

Mttis: a. oo- O0 i Ul tt »ooo OO-H-h-C a »* • » Ui> « *HQ o# Do: z <N •• 00 —» oo< «• •«

SO 0--*2:ll m •»-* X ct: txo: * * —3 • #•-. •^ 21 CO LU in LUh- * #QO Z-M-i^ X X ^—i •* H • > * «• V•O 00 0* <o in «CN • Ul co <o * * .2:* z 1—1* • z m O >vLU 2: LL CtLU «• •H-m—ts: a H--H- ->-i •» • in »_J * •ft H-00 # •«• •2"^ •—

1

<X# Xh • » • - O •» X * M- r\)

D5! H- |—# sOOO to X<N —% z X ^^ Z-i « * rHaz> < oo-fr -< z >*•"< < iH • u-o •K- *LLQ z> «•- LU a —»LL "VQ. i-H in a. •«• «•

Q «—» a _i#oo 1—

i

•• •> —^t-t k • Oll »• #x—I + .-I vj" LU <*aio h- - X cnX • CO C * «-<N|2: > ^ 1 l-ttl-.-. < O0 <M . - OCO • LL LL » *DOS w z 2*<u: h- CC - <•»• 00 •ft OO * * inQOS a: a o*zo 00 LULO I-* - » X UJ * H- #03 < —

t

M#t-. \- • <•«• - 00 •• f—

4

ZH «• *<f— «Q > 1- ~#a UL LU-4- o# -2: X •»^» o< !<• * rHmO » t—

o_#a:o O 2:^ # xo N -H-J * *LL-Om —1 a o#oz • LL O-M- 0^t-i t-nn K-3 •«• *vO z X*Om LU * +* LU* —II— ». «. • <ro * •«• X

<<xm— Q -> #01 2: XX >* »< m xco _j_i «• •« mh-<* H hH z* 1- < aom QL* • K- • r^LL o< »• * *Z>QO z I 3# act: z • » LU* OOO 00 »• •" OO »• * *-»3 1—1<—

1

—o + m >- a#»-to m - >r O0-M- LU -rnx —ILU •* •«-<r0— 2:00 03 CD 2:* ens: m 00< CC-K- >LL •-H—

(

<cc « •«• in00 —

1

OU<H 1 _n#o X o_m O*0:0 • V. •• ~-00. tt •« »O ••OOO • (NJ h- - \- Q m LU •» . m UJ 2: »xm - * * *x00^2: >o ao^^vO 00 •> •.27>— •» h-X *V0LLI >t-^ »v. » * * # —

1

"* O II —

t

D *•* xxh c: _• LU-H XXCD2 • <t ••>*• XX * »• ««

»ii a: *- »ll 0^- ~3 mrnDO O 2: H-tO< OLOxd--4>th-Ln «• *-vO 0^ -J a -»(\|r\|- * z - CsJ mcO- 2 m »><U_<-H--) m m —t

"-" >LULJ -1 LUUJ < •» •» •. W ••»—

<

*• •»• —- »XLn »Hri •> •« •» •««— _J2;|-_J "•—II i-o 1

• ^ XX •* X -^^ X x>r *x "N^ X X •0-J2.»-i2 M2 -H UJ •-t"»v —»co X CNJX *n o^x^^o •XOJXW m h»X

Luo<rr_ia:»-i iu^>toc:i-i •• h- - v. rnrg F-(-,[f|H»«.s f\i>o ^f\JV.vtLT\>i-'V>s. ^h -HfN(->tUQ3Kh->t^3t- O 3 •> m•-4 Z »-< ZLLI a.a_0 Ocno OD -— 2: • O2D U3Q uz c l-H-H-HK- K ^- 1- 00 1-\- h- \- h- h- 1- \~ t- H- h- »- 1- h-l-

HH Ul <<<<< <t- <<u_<<r<<oo<<<<<<<--<-»<<hh a. 2:2:2:2:2:-^125! -2: 2-2:2:

-

2" 2: 2: 2: 2" 2: 2: 2: 2:2:zM a O ixctcCo-a: cl l— cc <Xx a: aC cc cc *-CC CC CC LL CC CL CC - ix^cna:Qa z h- OOOCO^CCiOQHCOOOXaOQCQCOWOSCO03 LU O0 LL.LLU_U.LL. •llOllll -U- LL LL LLin U. LL LL LL LL u. LLZ U- *S. U_ LL*•«•»• fl « •«00000 O 00 OOOO OOOOOOO OO00 OHOJ(*1>t in vOh- coomO'—1 ogro^Lnvor-co o> OH

sO r»-co OOOOO 00 OO—t-^ HHHHr-IHH ^h rg<M>r >r>r

OOOOO O

1 40

Page 148: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

•» •» # * - H HH t—

>

— O X X • CO z• * CO * «• LU t- co • »-H o o X OC <J

z •M- {« co 2: •—

i

CI t —CO MH *—> o LU• t 0m, o «. * OC^H CO Ol Q - ^ CO X -< h- D

2" s: »—

i

# 0m, * UJ o oc c^u UJ 3: X LU UJm H- tt •«• >co Q. z < •< oc 3 2 >

• » t—

t

# m M- <z: o O -CD o 1- oc•» *. to— CO «• * cto z •—

1

CD UL < h- -O UJ

(M <N oc O * • *i -i i o 1- -»-» > -Hl- < O CO

»_H l-H u<- a. •M- CO * h- M< <r uj hhco h- z (NJ CO•» • h- •M-

•* U-Q. h- H ^ ^—. »-OC co o z LO C_, » UJ • z * * OG < CO •• - t—

t

< »~« o co

2:co o •8- •» M- »~ 'v- _J>v U_ mJ t- 1—1 • u

'

• t oc •—

1

tt LO •* •zn co U' •• • <X "*tt »<-< K- in xD a - UJ H M- • « OS CO - <Z Z- UJ UJ CO h-< u^ h-

H- < * 00 M- •-H»- UJ oc ZH- M2ZI X o CT LO

m • inuj »~ # U- « K CO UJ C< SCCH h D. o - LL•» » •2: CO * «» * <tUJ OC > mQ oCi—im Q. <N O

0m, CO m vO M- . --, •« -Ja: UJ < |— —UJl— h-OC CC h- p~

Ml K^ ~H» UJ « * Z)<'—

>

ac Q-0C H-O.M<o o co h- o zV. » P- UL - CO •M- »m •« o < H- OUJS OCOU- LL oc CO - o^ • » -in OC # s: •« -JUJ'- oc H- -s: o t~i < Nf hh

ir\ • • UJ & • » <a:*h- Q CCZ- OOCD-O o LL -J 1—

t n II o--> # - CO * OLU' UJ Z5LU •OCD Ui UJ o <00 « II iH < * — -or. * X -z. CO C LUU-OZco co U 1 UJ Z *~'

u_ * CO u-cnjot: •« (MUJ * CH-XUJ o —>0_J >2D z> X X M >- X z •n-11- * •—»K- »- h- ir^o. _l 1— t-sUJ C h- h- X UJ

X 00 a • •—

l

* UJ » •'•fO <_> - a: ul>oCZC'T CO h- Q

-H - MH O # oc- s: # 2ICO •» f>Ot/» mO^< < CO C0- o:

» • 1— II<• UJ # o * <z: - u. LL U_Z<I— U_ 3 3: t—

)

M o o<\i a: < • tCO « oc •- » rxC j a o Z OI-CJ LL Z oi

i- o h- •hi-<o # QCQ •• » OtH •« OojM«ogCZ z z z -»<oc to X —I # uj in « Oh- •Z z —> H-QOC O o o--c o o

x oc: UJro o # —» • • K- o:t-<:s:o o h-cx:ol uuocuji-h t—

(—1 t—1'-*•-.- z•H UJ a. U-H II

•* LL »>0 i> a.co«<i-i —I a.OQ>-hOZh h- »-••- H- oco<•» LU Z - LL * u_m^ * ooci- h- O COZ. <•-< »—

1

1—

t

•t—1<• OQHm x Q- <- '» o-»)»• SOmU. •* <D.O< < HO hHZW CO COOCO • OtOM H- i— or: * « » fc •* # 1D-J _J OC 3< O o olijco»^o* 3 OC irtOXZ- M- - Q. - * 1-lZCt^ D OOCI— 1—>0CUIO_ a. o.>o_ui OUJx 2: o m<cccooi— •«• * z * MQau o OLU <C0UJX 1DC :>UJOsJX-4 l-H a: ooC'-tM<Z# # Z5 II H * —* Mim _J -J >h-UJO l-H-Z z zujzoc-JLni—•—.NJ cc' UJ *»— ui-fr » O » COI— <r < zee <rz 2 2 2CODCb!O-C0

<\l < LU a .- <2:##c_: M- - H<XU o COUJ<O.I— UJCOO o OCDO(/)-£. «coM«V. •-•UJ >-—II— -M- * UJ # »• XH->t »-i UJ< mZ z ZOZDD<lTlM» -_l X QiOODW* •«• ^IO « • 1—CO iH (%J UJUJI—OUJ ^ i^ ^c ^oxm- >J-< i- OZ<U3*# U»-Z «• * »—cOoCZ co»— (/> UJini—A<H- 3 <a:-J-7-«- #LU3< M- X •»* •* *» <<UJUJq:<<CO t/^ co<coc'T c\j<1 mo 2: -J|-Z><Q# * ISH •» h-XX - X X Xujx ujuix*-" •—

»

t—

1

3«-"^och-x-»- i—

i

<wou<# &• o»-«co tt Lno^>i- »>d- <4" 2_Jt—Hh_131 X x' I2C02- X- M I— »—«<_j- • •* - IVJ1-H «^ •M- •>•>••:x » •» - a.. - zcl- i— H K-LLJl- LL-J----H - < QO< -CO -» «<Q •* w m m o- • — -UJ- — - —

,_J- tl(» -f\| -x m »-- ' XUJX-M- x- - rvl > •»••«•» <-*•* •M-"•X -XX -X - •k -(J> -._l -OCXe-tcgCN •* — -r\la:(\l-H- <\i - •« F^»^» ^» COX>0-4-CNXsQX X XZXOXUSCM•»)—1 ».-x-- XX -< * »XX——. • •» ••>'^s * ••« (NJOHM. ^H^-ttNJ CM r\J<tNi:ZNhHX -^ o\j - (NNNJ ^ >v.(MC\J O^X XXX -X-• X* ».f\J «. fcCNJ — rm\ fH r^ H<HZ -

X-^ * -*H Cs)CN<lO OOO'- O-rt- O" >v -^ X -X - * w;z: - -UJ"Xin^'v v» \S\' M-^*v*v,-. •-•LLLO'-t—»—1—tr-l^. r-H« . pH •» V ^^^.^ ^ ^v<'

t • l•» •kl •. X iH «£

«-»_., 'S< CQ—•</)»» «-»<__~_i—

.

^www «_><w-^mm*m «-»*^v. »<-iXwff)ww—"»'»<»^ww w ~-" «.>—

.

. w-X^-CO »• •w • X >t * :X - vO

hhh.• K-«• »-»-H-H-<K* t-l-J-H-l-H-t-H-ttH-H* LTM- -H-- KI-hl-l-h-hH H- I— <MI— XI— CNll—<<< -< •»<<«UJ<-H- <<<<<<<<-& <<£- *< - «/)«<«<<<--.< <^H<f\J< -<txsrsTLo^-msrsrsrsi-Jsr-tt' 5"s:s:5-2:s:s:s:-m-5:2" — ^ 'xz^z!: 2:2:2:2:3:- 2:—2: -2"-<2: ,^2:ocacoc »o. toCocoCa: oCi> QCoCocoCarocoCoc* oCqcxcooccoqCOocqcocqCocoCc^ciC tuc- oc^oc -cic -llOOOOOOCOQOOOOft OOCOOOOO* OO^hCZOmCOOCCOOCHO *o »o^o-

o

U_U_U-U.LLLLU.LLU.ULCOU.-M. LLU.U-U_LLU_U.U_-M- LLU- -XLLOLLH LLLLU-U.U_LLU.U_XLLH-LL- LL -U_ •LLft # # fr •{$ $}•&# -tt- -K- -* -^- >> it000 o 0000 o 00000000 00 o o 00000000 00000

tMrovj- lo sOP»cocr» o H(MrovtLnvor^co 0^0 -h oj m>tiri^or~-oofj>o h n «i ^ 10(\|f\ic\i og cMOvirsjrg ro mrnrrirorocOrnm r0>4- -4" ^" -4" -4" «4" >J" -4" >t >J" Ti w in in in ^

1 41

Page 149: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

•» x o> >—f h- t-*~< *-* K c - •> *^^» -• • m -^ i- i—

i

oo 1- »-i 1—

<

—. - • 0"v UJo • ~i •• •—

«

OO i^lX l-i OO L_ * *-» • —* - &I- oo v^ O0 o out 00 o < — CD •• <i00 <x *v "^ o a. *x\- O Ql- H 2 . O inuj

1U •h •» a CQZ Q. • 00 o —

»

O H- -HCt O0un 1— - m z lu z- »—

»

f^ C_- LL< UJ-J UJ O O z o 21- z o UJ H- ^ Z - t- —

.

Q. 2" • :? 1—

1

o «• 2 H-tog X— H-! • oz - - 00 Z2l i/\ oo o K- OfX O (-I-H 1- 00 m •-•(-! «^- u«—< •»v

< >a- cL UJ z < u_>t z < - C UJ t-l-H< • O0_J H- m»

x o IJJ -J *: (- cm ^ I-- zoa o •-»(— in <—-sO^OO m

uj •4- 1- O 00 UJ * 00 U'O z (/)t-H * Z —-i 00^t- lu-»z (- oo*^ h- % U'OZ < O00X m (-<- D a:

a: o 5: <i oo UJ f-H>^ O0 UJ ISCNIO (- Q.C.CM 2: x 00 UJC • * a: 00 3 » CL WZ I— ini-i 00 CL-* 000000 t-u_ o ZOU! —1 or ^» t-« a:o U«OK 1—1 00 • CXCMLUZUJ LU

r- H-tQ> LL UJ O • LL UJ»-) co •< a m^S U-OLUh- CI- 2:•• (M OfX > Ooo ^>H- 0>H • — Xi-h » corsoooo-)X * z—»lu U> < _J UJ <»-t UJQNOO •• H-X- XC> OLUOCM CO c-*oo X (X o-^ X- CCO0 on X •^ K-2: J-(NIH ~3 00 -5 •

~4 O HO(C h- h- *-* 1- .(-C Z UJ -^ m- a DO^hQ O •»

O i- »o UJ • -^ D- <a:oo —4 ••<»-ct: 2"—«z< <r O>s <o h- H _J^ z z 1— u'ct: *i • <LL »—i «Z) " <-4

o i-i 3 < <t O-i UJ%UiZ O0H-Ui • co NfJ^ LL »>LL t

- z >a.O z UJ LUC hZ> —»UJ^» ozox <mu.aoo >o0- •—

i

LUUJ>- UJ UJ < • 2Z3h cu'< _J ImZI- —iO —

1

1

H- 0(_ _l _l 2: hOhH • a. >».o^ h-X^Z) O 00 *O0 LL00 OO ?c o o a uj>-uj<r Q -h- — *z » —

.

LUI— 1—2" MCtZZNZ >

c <r DUJw z z UJ<\1 CQ|— CC|— hX . <- 2:qc:oo>-i luIUOChC •z uj cc o < < >fO H-l OO QCsOLL ^> - oo in C?<M OH-mmLLmo <•• a: ujoouj OtNjO — «s» -c£ • ZZUJ< ZHH »- II

O Q O oo a Q UJ • UOOUJ •h •.QXUI 00 2:uj<<- <UJ-»t-t ZOOZ UJ UJ 00 c> zazw UJV.UJ . m H-tC0|_ LL (-•000 H— h-ii—1 1—

1

»uo a: <QCO > > CD <r <a: x^s: <« Ct. HJJ •> t— t—II—II—

1

Z)..>> II > >. o-• f-UJi-i a: OL aa^ 1— zh-uj h- -< H--M-0- 2: X <a:ct:ct: LULL! LU CM

z O0I— f- UJ UJ s0 t/>ooo> » z <» 00- -H DOOO • • iQQ» O »—

«

mO •• < Ujl-I oo O0 ••iH -)»-<•—«<t •• • Q-M- Z » • <3 00 ••

Q OUJ5TOO CO oo Qh-QcX <-^U) •«• - ox og uj2:r:s: UJ OOCMOZOUJQI O--o o ujoo < 1- ujq:x 0-& »KH^| —

<

1— f— H- -Jroctctli-ict:

oo>—IOI—na _it-« Qt-Q -JUJt— Uj-M- Xl-H •» Z3DD Q. •<< »^< %—i »Q.>f ~l - Ul UJ CL- >—io0»—iO O.K- »-•«• o>< » X O 2!o>GO- Oh-rn2IOooO>ojX X 21 a: ccz. SIUJOO O-M- -1 —4 c-1000000 <:cmzz z UJ< <>t»-» »z;nH- 1- <X oujo< <57K-( UJ* - O0 • •» |— 1—11—11—

1

X <<I3fc< OH-a:x^ < x^j- 00 « X cC* Q oo--ro 1—

1

UJ *h-h- h- zooujujoi— ii sioa: q: Ujrsj CLCCCC * UJfNIl— ct:* uju- H^ DHI-I- 2: 00O0 UJOO <H i< f-UJ UJ » UIUIUJX m< o* >o "^ —-»z<<< a. -J HWZCCOI • -* i- h- ac^ l->h-CN aoi l_>* Ct. • X oxxx OCtujujOuj 00

MUJON2DOH2 Z C z<z—

o »s - - uiui2:>t-^ino3c3:3 LLHIIZI »—

1

X li.r\|. hlOUJ UJ u_» UJC-'UJ u_o- •> *o02T <t * • V m m 1— 1— <h- C1— ..- oo «»oo- m » *"- h- - I-- *v • o> •• xxco< »mvj->t>- • • * •>•«—•* «

»ox ••a: » •» X-« —m • . r^X ininozo *<-HCDXXX xo •>»•••• •k

1- »X>OC\» XUJX X- xo X »x- X- (M C\J(NJ- . . XinLL- CMCNJvO CM XXXX X<00<N —»UJf\j»— <M o • O"—•• rgxrsl • <\J »»«H •• «> n —^ •» — »WHH —HCJ^i—!•—l-H-H ~H» Q—tix »_j—iz>-« 1—IB hi/)Oh(\jh. HX V. XXX XXX •• •*fT^ •» •»

••Z •HJJ'^sQ. *UJ > •w » *UJQ •—-H * •• O^ v. a'Nor-^^fMi"*-^^^ V.-*\^ "»s

xo^»i- >n»2:'^ "v •VCM^OlO^ -^s<N \<\l^ ^ CM (M ^(M^^^ ^ ""V^. VrgO Z < uj^Ul>— UJ—x— oo^>*oo - uj <t

1—1 O*-* V. 1—

1

»> - 00

. •k • •"x. h- -h- t— UJH- -~h- H-O^Hl-Qh- H- 1- •KhHh-HHhHI-l-l-l- K- -4-(-t-l- h-»o<x<qc:<_j< <«:<(—rg<z< :* <oo<r- <<<<<<<<<<<<—.<X«<< <- irvorosiar. 3! T P02K3: 2TI-.2: "2:2:2:^2:2:2:2:2:2:2:5- 21 s0 3^2:5:T--?ujcoa.cMa:u-cir:» a: • oCZ'cl.H- *ai o:z ct: ct:f\)c^c^ct(XctiLXct:oiLXcX(Xc^^a:cNJcr:<Jic^ oi-J O *"0- c ozoaoi^ozoo''CWOmOOOOOOOOCOOC<0 "OOCOVOO II U-V.U. »ULXU.DlLHU.O>0U.aiLH LLZIL U_ UL LL. U_ LL U_ U- U. U. LL LL U-^ U. V. U_ LL LL U_ "LL#« # # M • ##-W-tt##### * * #

o O O O o o o o o o OOOOOOOOOOOO O OOOO Ov0 r- oo O O -H cm m >4- m sor^coo^o^cMm^moh- 00 0*O--icm i-n

in in in in o vO v0 v0 O sQ vO>o>OvO^-^r,,-^-r>-p,-r*-f>- r»- f-coaoco CO

UJ

u o

1 42

Page 150: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

uuooouaao.ao.»»»»»»»»»uou-l-5:> K-OOO> T.> 3—

-

> z<r.m00 > »-ZUi > ro—1—_J > —<2Io > 2:03Z > COJ-^< > GO—

> — H-Ho > i

—-coirUJ > SIH-t-O> > DSCLZcc > Z3 - -UJ > ^-Z-

M

00 > ro«-|-—cq > 1x2:2:5:— O > 2!>3H-

UJ > CO »»Z>X XZ OIL > •»—.—»-< hO ZO > —COc^Occ — qc»-.uj< > h--'<2h- i-h-_j|-a: > 2i2:><<roo — oc <<Ooouj > z>^ +-2:1— o Z"OZmCD > zz -oooZ CiTl— h<Q2 > -—5:

3ui aiux<fj 3 > c\iao3~hH t-tUJt-H Q.QQZ > CL—^^!—

—o _j>oc:u_h-(U]uj > 2:— «-2~

•-« a. i— OH->ct:_i > oo coh-i<\io m>u-xxhz< _jo:z>< > z ..*i>-z oOLLMMi-OZZDUJWh > O "23: hh

zujcccc-Jm C2roo<o s> »—• i— «-2:m<OHH-DH<m CDUJH- > I— 2!—3-* COClO<<2Io 00X05: LU > < 3r<-»02: ZU« 2T2T IJUI— QcTi—• UJO > OC Z • »mart— uict:zu?oiLL.u_xz > < -to-ho. a:ozcDaOa:M>(-oot-< > _i —i—>co uioo< zocx;z< i— > u cc>->z:g) *->

t-"K-u-U-<too_H-i3:Q:c«iu_oo > uj 2:1—2: •>

QiOOOa UJUJOH-t > Q C0co3— ~(

2 OUJOCOl'cCCOcO O > -cOOl— Zqoujz<iooo5:5:z > uj — •> *2:UJOV)OJhLLLLU.DDOQ > -i m—3 D(— Cm ZZhui > CO —ml- Z. I—<«-ao0-"— LL'IXIUJ I— CL > < 2: *5: « z_j oooc zzzjjo > i-i :smz>r<i •-•

dxziuxxhhm«sw > a: wz—• ocOi-«<>H-tt-i(— h-hK-h 51< > < ZH- -^ Q- »s»

JCLClZ^DODOODU! > > Ocoi—m •• o<Hh'-iht-OOOI-H-WZ > i-tcQSrO- 3 Qo< <<oCcca: > oo »3co a. oU.]21UJUJ2:2:CDCQCQUJLUUJQ > >-t—*c •

CC XI D3DXI1Z > U«l-« -3 OQ-CDh-f— SOooooooh-h(-< > UJ -»-i»— * v.

> a:i-zr »-i oII II II II II II II II II II II II > Cl^-Q-D 5!

> 3 »z a: 3U_U- > LUZ— •> UJ Z

STrgU, > j-Qh Ou_>_i i- > cdh-zs: UJ <

I-hh 3Z3 21 > 32:-'3 h- h-srsisisizisiooi-isKQx > ocooz z <t2CCCDQ-i(i>Z),J>ZZZ > Q »Qw en Q

> *«•«o u o < a. >uj o o a. >-3 O O CL >UJ O U CL >u^uuu uuuououuoooouuuoououoouuuuuuuouoo o o

1 43

a o o Cuo o D.

H o u Ou2: o o a00 o o CL

o o a.

2: o o aCO u a O-* o o Q.

ro u o Q.

cc u o oo Q.

2: o o UJ O.

CO CJ o CC CL

o o < CLCNI o o 3 CL

CC u u a Cl

SI- o o oo a.CO o o 1 CL

-SL o o H CL-•tr- o u oo CL

QC> o o < a.2" - o o UJ CLCOO u o —1 CLz o o Q.

2T< o u u. CL

21- o o o Cl00 (_) o —

»

CL

Q » o o z CLor o (_) CO Cl!-•-' u o mO Cl00 Q. o o l-X Cl

co o t o <H- a<o o z o -JUJ a.

Q * o H- o 32! CL1-2! o cc o o a.00»-t u o -"Z CL 00

CL o CC o <o Cl zQC0 o \- (_) o»-< Cl oZ - u z o H Q. t—t

••s: o < o a:< Cl \~<Q o X o C3 Cl —1

Z » o o^t o u_a» CL z—

1

Q u Zoo o UJ Cl t-4

< \-\- u 30> o UJ Cl LLs;z o <M o z-z. Cl UJ

> 3m o o MO Cl a»-H ZQC u z o l-t- Cl

u_ Q. u < o 3h- Cl UJ1- «* o 2:^ o o«- a. _l< 3 o < o CCQ 0, co2 CfQ. o oo o COZ CL <

00 * o > o oo CL H-

1

o -IS u _l u 00O CL CCo o> o 1-3 u a. <l•« o -J-3 u <— a. >

ujct: o o Clz< o • • •• o oo • Cl»-i> o o »-«H- Cl»- » o ecuJ o z Cl31- o Oh o oouu ClOC0 o x< o hi2: Q.CC+-* o HO o Ih Clcoo. u 3 o l-oo Cl3 o < o 3 ClO0»-i o u "i Q.

•» o o D CL1 u u < a.1

o o CL1 <w> o Cl.

o u CL

Page 151: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

CNJ

>•X SLt-i 2T<Na: 3*H- O-* —

»

< —

»

m«2-

O > (Nco Q

O _

»

2:rvj

2!>-0—

u. • 32T -^ a:o *-4

1

-3 000moo OS3 ^i->

LU —

1

00 OO t—1

00 «-»»»«-» w • • 2: 11

o w H--*^ 3w >—

>

Q- •Ht-IM # m —Z ««t/) 2: OO II II *H "7* O —•

z w-w —

»

CO oro »—«0>-' a 1- -3

< 2:3 —— O 2:00 H- 2:-3a: ^rgm H-

1

H- II DZ- H —30 (/> 3 fH(- a:u:c£ 2: X Z -0-3 23 h-z .

2:2:2: «•« 3— 1—

1— II ~i - - O < — —

»

2: UJ*'UJ CO CO CD Z CC 2: II HH t-1 O C— 3-iZX 1- 2: —

h- 3 — <rt- 11 II z • »-«

h- 2: II II II 3 —1 < 1—Z-» UJ—— -"* Zooa: z»- i II 2:3 -5 2: 2: - -5Z - t/3— * —

.

—1 1—IQ.LU Z-»-*-. ro 11 ro II

3~^~3 t»—

1

LU ~H -t II 2: -H + -3

O •» k •—

^

Q. z -«-i 2:2:311 »-i t-tQ-OZ *

DmII ^O II <

-3II —O

z •» •* •- 1-3 LL »H •-* -UJ O >• — LU Z —UJ•-»—*U-o II —tc\irO II 1-. II OSZ O -J— ~- h-3 LUhSJ 3t-« 3 HM*-1 C0C0>-« II W zz 2:_ia:z 11 cczOh- i—c

~~-— UJ »-t«— LU K< l-LU Z OSSU. On-tLU 03«»-i0 <t~l(NO< n0 3 3 ZD O mnOQCLm UhD300DU>ha, -5>|-hOH 1—

(•002:2:2: —*OJZOO OZ *-* zza. 2T z3 II _» CD CD CO t—1 r\iZ2»-' ^•0 o»-i in OO c-* 3 OO OOo_ II II 1- h- h- od r-o Oh-

O OO 002: ir\ z Z z LU zc OrHCOO OO OO O > ou_

»-*ZZO UO OO O z—I

Oh

O O 00 OOO O—

1

<N n^ in^r- CO 0>

ou uuoou

1 44

Page 152: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

cc<>

ooo

Lil

213QZ1-3

DmUJOh-

3

ZZOhOf-ZOu

K-< —

.

2:cc

CD u—1

ll •»

y-2: —

.

LU 3CO z a:c m* LU0. h- (-H

co CO •»

2: (—4 ro< 0. *-ex » •»

1- r- X >-

2: 1—

<

CO> 3 a: COCO Z H •»

•» < r-X r- 2: 2:1—

1

51 3OH 3 »- 2H- Z • •»

< •» CO ro2! m * Z

l-l 5-

00 3cc zLU> t-z 2:>-H CO

u_ >-«

o 2:

o —\- u-< LLO _l-4 3_l 2:CL >

<

co

X—

I

cc

<2:

CO

Li.

o

ro

roz

CD

a.

2!CD

O "-1—1

H U_< LL.

U _J

_l 2:

<

Xt-H

CCr-

oCOCCui>

ro

coCD

rozro

co co* coCO

LL.

O LL

>

<

cc

r-<

LLO

r-<h-3O-2:o

a:LLI

roZ2!

roz

rozro

COCO

LL—I

32!>

<

Xcc

<

3a.2!Oo

X

— oa:LU

2:3

>ro

ro

2-

3

2.

> >-H

LLO

LL-J32:>

<

>CCLUCOCOoz<

a:CorDC

Qct:

<az<1-00

LLaz\-ox

Z LL <LU

3UhIt—

1

<z03uucox<i-x

II LLUL

32:2:CN2ZZ>>rOh— *-i

^>V~_J_I

Oao«000

3o<oLUX

32Z>

<

3O<

Xr-

LL

_J32:

>

<

cc

oc— -* —. <LU 2"

.-•CX a: CC•LU LU LL! 1—

«

J— Y—> •—

1

X (-H •

2! •« -4 •• O,3-^ m CC m *ZZ z \~ z CD• «. h < •» !<

CCO 2: 2: 2: —

<Z t-H *—< H>< O. »—

1

a •

•+- CO t CO CO1—to *» 0. *2: - H- »• t> HH

3H- 2: CO m •

Z2- 3 •)(• —r Q.-3 Z —« •» w-

1—

Z

•^ I- m CD2" » rn • z3r-t ^^. CD V* LUZZ •» * H CO•» *. K- t—

1

21 CC.^-H 2! • 3 LUZZ X 3 O- Z >•» •» t-H Z •« •h zr-h- CC •> CO ro 1—

1

2:2: h- 1— Z w33 < Z LU •> »•

ZZ 2! 3 to m H-«» «k •» Z CC z •

K-H 1—

1

•» LU •» CO•1 2TZ • m > 21 #

3 •» a. z z •—

«

1—

1

— zee •M-•. •—

1

a. •

*•<. co »—

1

'

CD a.SL 2T> 2: ••

> > - LL 0. LL •—

«

LL-2! O 9* O 1- O

II 2TH- 2: coo> z co 4C CD z

*-» O

3O-J

<uLUX

0000o^cmco

(NJ

uoooo oouo 000 000 000 uoouu 000 000 00

145

Page 153: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

X—

1

a:

<

» m —• —2: o in -» -• ir\

o ft ir> o mo* ». —. q hh *^inir\o»—.

rO \— h-t — ^» OO*-'*Z 5! in •» m in — »—••—• •> (

• 3 O rO Z m O • •» |— 3Eh- Zi-iZ^Oi-iin^l— 213Z «•»•.»-•-« -OZ2: 3 Z33 I— I— I— s:*roi-H»3Z«-z s:2:5:3mz»i-z-h-• 33 3ZZ»-^X-m2:

I- ZZz»*mz3mZ32: •>•• •>*-<*> z»zz*>z3 I— rO|— 2TZ*m»»r<")»'z z:z2:3*rozi-roz»-— 3»3zmz-2:z zm zmz»z«>co3-2:3ZZ •-• ~Z • t— » »-h z Z Z hh z••OO m» hcQh K»» h Q. •«

h m W — 2! 2! Z i-h CO CO 2T 2T Q. cQ s2! I-- -H CL CO COCLCO CD ^. > CD O QZ> < S - - •• .* » .. Qz»— o 3 ro m rnmrn mmco m m ro z-3 1- zz zzz -z -ZL "Z. z z z <»-« 2; o - - ... ... . . -coO-OO O i-> O *J) <^> <*J i-> U> <J> o o oCQ <_> —-» (N — I — I

—— 1 — —• • —

- I—

- I—— I

—»I-*-*

I-»-•

a — o cc ex: cl cc oc cc o_ q: or: cc cc- 111 oom^ o- o- 00- o- o- 00- o- o- 00- 00- 00- 00

|— X OO^h • tO ^ OU"> vO h- O°0 0> O 0<-H 0<N 0(*1 >4T\JCD t— OOhvO OvO^OO-O-O^OOwO-h^Oh-Oh-Oh-hO»-1 • —!.-• r-» r^ —I-* —t .H —t-H r-« H --H^ —•—• -H -H —I—

t

o. u_ a » » 11 w -3: -2: - -2: -2: »2- -2: -s: *s: » -2: •• -3: -3: -o ujvoo vou- ,>Ou_vOvOll>Oij_^oij-v0^olj_^ollvOu->OvOul>0'Ou_>o>ollv0^o

«- • hhUJUU 33 333 333 3 3 3_j —w h-3w</5—oo——CO—CO—CO—CO—CO—CO——CO—*—O—CO——

»

U_ •-. a OmZ -J 3 3 3 3 3 3 ^ 3 ^ 3LL < I—UJtU^-C^fUJ 1X1 UJUJ LU UJ LULU LU UJ U.IU' UJL'J UJUJ LUUJ-I I- Zh-h--»3»-h-_l| »l— I

II

II——II— I— —II

II— —>l— I— —II— I— —II— 1--It— I

!^ UJ I—11-11—1 Z»-lJ',H-lMH<_|lH_lMjt-IM_jM_lM-JMMjMM_jMM_jMM2. o ccacczo aa:<a:<c£ct:<a:<D:<c£a:<cr:<a:<<^c£<a:a:<ct:a:<c£c£:> Q.33Q 030303303030330303033033U33033_J Z —< CC U.O D> i-i

oi-H <-i

146

a.*CD**-^

»-•

iXi

*»-i

Q-•M-

CD

UJinCC —*

Uf ->

>r7

* oi—

i

QM O•«• •

1- m•

CD ^«i—

i

o• z

a.

1

<1-00

H-1 w•

Q.co s:

U. < 3O Oi-Z

15" •*

z —3-1o zH-

1

1^— — II

1— CCr*< O -5

-J 00 ||

3 o oUJ o 1-hCO3 _l II ~*

z < o—

i

o oo>oI- Z-iQ<c_ UJ <o X l-Ou h- OOQ

oLT»

Page 154: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

Q 3-> —

'

z.•• V) k

t— co h-< s:— Q 3w z

s: »- •»

o cc 1-a* s:

1 00 3OQ z

—»^»—

o •»

-t* o 5:-1 Q (\l Qaz h»-n_< o m

»- h- z^»0</) •»

o o iMII o o

at— -»~.|

Q. —

«

— a:-5 <DO-

II •-< oom• <3^—

«11J<- •HH *»2L a * »"S:

-> •CCUJ LUvO-OLL. O» o • 3 O

•"-••-|>Z —«-t/> OMUJ o 3 iHw— |—3 |—UJUJ

z2 2TJ—I— _l O2TUL 0>-<UJ»-«iHMJUIom oh- 3c£c£o£<r>»'ZZHS30Z ZOh K-.U.KX

OI-— 1— 1— =)z. 2r»-i~ou. OQiUJO"-' usa:

ooo or*-ooo>> o—

(

1—1^ CM

a:

» <

—»- a.

X • h-m - ho. •

O X CC* CDl-i — »-l I- CO #» — a: <•* i-i

h- ^ h 2I-» •

2: v. ^ < h- a.•> >s 2: »-. • #* « »C0 CD

- <^H- 0l*XX • «>-• UUt-H HH-»*VCD CD • I/)

or: oi "v-m- * a. cc\— \— ->v ••»-» «# —.liJ

< <«V- • h-CD >2: 2 »xa ~» • "s^z:

—» • HH-fr COLLI •*-

«

a.—.coxaico— "•^tt.oo- wv •—«l

*»-<a:x-M-

OsCHrcvsxa>cc •

• - <t — •+—<•* 2!l— CDx z- luszh-z- - oicDHH<*»-h OXW tOXXH *— 2!>-«

a; mmOH- cD»-i»-<HH<rijj-«i •

H- t/>a:Q- •* 00a: c£ 2:001—>a.<t-*cc\- cocD»-<a:t— h- a: •*2: U-KZ-fr »UJ<<»-iUJCDa. 1

o>5i<»-iQ->2:2: •>*«3.-»zr a: •# z: o_shh»— •-<

1 ti-icoi— q-cd»-h^>-m- >-> • • •

• tn» -..-.-• co«-'a.>a-

XU-XXXXXXXX •.»*rn mor~cM.Hmr*-r^xxxxx

—»»^xm»t-^c\irs)-H inLnmLnin•*\j •>•.•>«»»»«*.•••. •.

- NHSNSSV

Hhl-HI-l-HI-(-|-Hht-hl-l-

ccuLcColcCcCcCcCcCcCcCcccCcccccC^ Oooooocoooooooooo 2ULU-U-U-U-ULLLLLULU-LLU-U-U-aU-V. ID

0000000000000000o—• cm rn >?m so r- 00 cj> o >-* cm rn *rm0000000000--t—t^^-H-H

000 00 00

1 47

Page 155: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

LIST OF REFERENCES

1. Bomford. Brigadier G. , Geodesy., Second Edition / p. 1

,

Oxford university Press, T9"5"Z

.

2. Palikaris, Athanasios E. , Methods of HydrographicSurveying, used by Different countries, ?.?. Tnesis,ITaval Postgraduate Softool. Monterey, California, p.139, 1983.

3. Davis, Raymond E. , Foote, Francis S. , Anderson, Jair.esM. , and Mikhail, Edward M. , Surveying Theory andPractice, Sixth Edition, McGraw-rTiII, 79B"T.

4. Department of the Army Technical Manual (TM 5-237) ,

Surveying Comp ute r' s Manual, 1964.

5. U.S. Department of Commerce, Federal Geodetic ControlCommittee, Classification, Standards of Accuracy, a ndGeneral Specifications of Geodetic Control Surveys,pp7~F-7, -TT7ZT7

6. U.S. Department of Commerce, Environmental ScienceServices Administration, Coast and GeodeticSurvey,Horizontal Control Data, Quad 361214, Stations1 37, 1 0"5"87~T05~9A", "and"TU6H7~T96 3 .

7. Mikhail, Edward M. , and Gracie, Gordon, Analysis andAdjustment of Sur vey Measurements, Van NostranT"RemEoIcI Company, T98T.

8. Hardy, Holland L. , A Brief Outline and Demonstrationof the Theorv and Practice or least Sguares, p. T,TJnpuEIisEed frote.

9. Hardy, Rolland 1., Least Scuares Adjustment ofTr averse, p. 4, UnpuBIIshed ftote.

10. Pacific Marine Center, NOS, Horizontal Control Reportfor Moss Landing - Naval Postgraduate ScEgol Survey,

148

Page 156: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Durgin, Casper M. and Sutcliffe, Walter D., Manual ofFirst-order Traverse, Coast and Geodetic Survey SpecialPuETIcaTiou to. T37, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1927.

Ewing, Clair E. and Mitchell, Michael M., Introduction tojgodesy, Elsevier North Holland Publishing Company, 19T9.

Graham and Neil, Introduction to Computer Science AStructure Approach", ftesl FuMisKIng Company, T982.

Hodgson, C.V., Manual of Second and Third OrderIriangulation and Traverse, CoasE and Geodetic SurveyS'peciaT'FubTica^ion Wo. TS5, U.S. Department of Commerce,1935.

149

Page 157: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

INITIAL DISTRIBUTION LIST

No

2.

3.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

Defense TeCameron StAlexandria

LibraryCode 0142Naval PostMonterey,

chnical Information Centeration, VA 22314

raduate SchoolA 93943

Copies

2

Chairman, Department of OceanographyCode 68WrNaval Postgraduate SchoolMonterey, CA 9 3943

NOAA LiaisPost OfficMonterey,

Office ofNaval OceaDepartmentWashington

CommanderNaval OceaNSTL, MS

CommandingNaval OceaBav St. LoNSTL, MS

CommandingNaval OceaBay St. LoNSTL, MS

Chief of N800 NorthArlington,

Chairman,U. S. NavaAnnapolis,

Chief, HydDefense MaBuilding 5U.S. NavalWashington

Lt . SamanHydrographRoyal ThaiBangkok 10THAILAND

on Officere Box 8688CA 93943

the Directornography Division (OP-952)of tne Navy

, D.C. 20350

nography Command39529

Officernographic Officeuis39522

Officern Research and Development Activityuis39522

aval ResearchQuincy StreetVA 22217

Oceanography Department1 AcaderavMD 21402

rographic Programs Divisionpping Agency (Code PPH)

Observatory, D. C. 20305-3000

Aumchantric DepartmentNavy

600

150

Page 158: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

13. Personnel DepartmentRoyal Thai NavyBangkok 10600THAILAND

14. LibraryHydrographic DepartmentRoyal Thai NavyBangkok 10600THAILAND

15. Chief. Hydrographic Surveys BranchN/CG24, Pool 404, WSC-1National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationRockville, MD 20852

16 Program Planning, Liaison, and Training Division 1

NC2, Room 105, Rockwall BuildingNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationRockville, MD 20852

17. Director, Pacific Marine CenterN/MOPNational Ocean Service, NOAA1801 Fairview Avenue, EastSeattle, WA 98 102

18. Director, Atlantic Marine CenterN/MOANational Ocean Service, NOAA43 9 Pest York StreetNorfolk, VA 23510

19. Dr. Rolland L. HardyDepartment of Oceanography, Code 68 XzNaval Postgraduate SchoolMonterey, CA 93943

20. Associate Deputy Director for HydrographyDefense Mapping Agency (Code DH)Building 56U.S. Naval ObservatoryWashington, D.C. 20305-3000

151

Page 159: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

13 3 7 5

Page 160: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment
Page 161: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment
Page 162: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment

2111:

ThesisA9622c.l

AumchantrA comparison of

methods of least squaresssadjustment of traverses.3.

/ 3 L.D

ThesisA9622c.l

AumchantrA comparison of

methods of least squares

adjustment of traverses.

Page 163: A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment of ... The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A comparison of methods of least squares adjustment