a cognitive antidote to boredom: motivational effects of interspersing quizzes during fact learning...
TRANSCRIPT
A Cognitive Antidote to Boredom: Motivational Effects
of Interspersing Quizzes During Fact Learning
Alice F. Healy, Matt Jones,
Lakshmi Lalchandani, & Lindsay Anderson Tack
Prolonged work on a single task results in performance deterioration
Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff (Pachella, 1974; Healy, Kole, Buck-Gengler, & Bourne, 2004)
Cognitive Antidote Principle (Kole, Healy, & Bourne, 2008)– Focus of attention can be lost in a long
tedious task– Interrupting the task with additional
cognitive requirements could counteract task disengagement
Experiment
ConditionsStandard (quizzes interspersed throughout learning)Postponed (quizzes at end of learning)
Quiz questions covered only half of learning material.
Testing after a delay covered all material.
The Task
64 true facts about 8 categories of “plants” 8 exemplars in each category
8 Trees8 Shrubs8 Weeds8 Fungi……Etc.
Exemplars were given novel names to control for prior knowledge.
Specific Fact Format
A tree that is sacred in Hinduism is the Buttony.
General Fact Format
A tree that is popular in eastern religion is the Buttony.
Design
Between-Subjects VariableLearning Condition (standard, postponed)
Within-Subject VariablesQuiz status (quizzed, not quizzed)Test (immediate posttest, retention test)Test Fact Format (specific, general)Block (1-8)
Dependent VariableProportion of Correct Responses
Quiz Performance
How Well Does Quiz Performance Predict Subsequent Test
Performance?
Hierarchical Linear ModelPosttest Retention Test
Levels of Model:SubjectItemTrial (within subjects and items)
Predictors:Learning Condition (standard,
postponed)Test Format (specific, general)Quiz Performance (not quizzed,
correct, incorrect)
Subject Item
Trial
How Well Does Quiz Performance Predict Subsequent Test
Performance?
Quiz
Condition Format
Effect of Quiz on Posttest
Trial Level
Interaction of learning condition and quiz performance
Postponed: .060 Standard:.186
Interaction of test format and quiz performance
Specific: .197 General:.048
Effect of Quiz on Retention Test
Trial Level
Interaction of test format and quiz performance
Specific: .118 General:.014
Subject Level
Interaction of learning condition and quiz performance
Postponed: .697 Standard:.352
PosttestTrial Level
Interaction of test format and quiz performanceSpecific: .197 General:
.048Interaction of learning condition and quiz performancePostponed: .060 Standard:.186
Retention TestTrial Level
Interaction of test format and quiz performanceSpecific: .118 General:
.014Subject Level
Interaction of learning condition and quiz performancePostponed: .697 Standard:.352
Conclusions
Interspersed quizzes can serve a motivational function as a cognitive antidote to boredom. Interrupting learning with quiz questions is desirable because it can enhance learner engagement.
The interspersed quizzes can effectively predict delayed test performance on particular items by individual subjects.
Practical Implications
These findings imply that clicker questions interspersed throughout a lecture should be useful for the students to dispel their boredom and for the teachers to enable them to predict subsequent test performance.
NSF Grant DRL1246588 to the University of ColoradoAlice Healy and Matt Jones, Principal Investigators