A BRIEF HISTORY OF A BRIEF HISTORY OF MODELS OF THE ATOM MODELS OF THE ATOM

2b: Models in Science and Religion2b: Models in Science and Religion

A Brief history of (models of) the atomA Brief history of (models of) the atom[1] The Greeks[1] The Greeks

The first people to suggest that the world was The first people to suggest that the world was

composed of atoms (Greek composed of atoms (Greek atomosatomos, literally , literally

‘indivisible’) were the Greek thinkers ‘indivisible’) were the Greek thinkers LeucippusLeucippus and and

his disciple his disciple DemocritusDemocritus in the 5th cc BC. Democritus in the 5th cc BC. Democritus

argued that atoms were solid, hard, incompressible argued that atoms were solid, hard, incompressible

and indestructible. Atoms existed not only for matter and indestructible. Atoms existed not only for matter

but for perception. Sourness for example, was but for perception. Sourness for example, was

caused by needle shaped atoms.caused by needle shaped atoms.

A Brief history of (models of) the atomA Brief history of (models of) the atom[2] The emergence of experimental science[2] The emergence of experimental science

In the 17th and 18th centuries a number of individuals, who were In the 17th and 18th centuries a number of individuals, who were

important in the beginnings of what we would now call important in the beginnings of what we would now call

experimental science, advocated some form of atomic theory. experimental science, advocated some form of atomic theory.

GassendiGassendi argued that God created atoms. argued that God created atoms. BoyleBoyle said that atoms said that atoms

differ in “shape, size, motion or rest, and texture.” differ in “shape, size, motion or rest, and texture.” NewtonNewton wrote wrote

in the in the OpticksOpticks, “God in the beginning form’d Matter in solid, , “God in the beginning form’d Matter in solid,

massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable Particles…no ordinary massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable Particles…no ordinary

Power being able to divide what God himself made.”Power being able to divide what God himself made.”

A Brief history of (models of) the atomA Brief history of (models of) the atom[3] The beginning of ‘modern’ atomic theory[3] The beginning of ‘modern’ atomic theory

DaltonDalton, in the first decade of the 19th cc, extended the work , in the first decade of the 19th cc, extended the work of Proust and produced the first application of atomic theory of Proust and produced the first application of atomic theory to chemistry. He argued that molecules of a single element to chemistry. He argued that molecules of a single element are atoms of the same fixed mass. Also, his law of multiple are atoms of the same fixed mass. Also, his law of multiple proportions showed how, using atomic theory, compounds proportions showed how, using atomic theory, compounds are formed with the integer ratios of constituent elements. are formed with the integer ratios of constituent elements. Atoms were joined together by forces. This work was Atoms were joined together by forces. This work was extended by Gay Lussac, extended by Gay Lussac, AvogadroAvogadro, Cannizzaro and , Cannizzaro and others. Note that not every idea of these men was found to others. Note that not every idea of these men was found to be subsequently correct.be subsequently correct.

A Brief history of (models of) the atomA Brief history of (models of) the atom[4] The Kinetic theory of gases[4] The Kinetic theory of gases

Interestingly, although Kinetic theory had been Interestingly, although Kinetic theory had been independently developed by independently developed by BernoulliBernoulli, Herepath and , Herepath and Waterston it was many years before it was widely Waterston it was many years before it was widely accepted. The caloric theory held sway for many years. accepted. The caloric theory held sway for many years. Caloric was a hypothetical weightless fluid in substances Caloric was a hypothetical weightless fluid in substances that could turn into heat. Only when that could turn into heat. Only when JouleJoule showed that showed that heat was a form of energy in the 1850’s did caloric theory heat was a form of energy in the 1850’s did caloric theory collapse. Clausius, collapse. Clausius, BoltzmannBoltzmann and Maxwell were able to and Maxwell were able to fully develop kinetic theory based on particles in motion.fully develop kinetic theory based on particles in motion.

A Brief history of (models of) the atomA Brief history of (models of) the atom[5] The Periodic Table[5] The Periodic Table

The power of atomic theory became evident when Mendeleyev published his periodic table of the elements in 1869. He built on the insights of Avogadro and Cannizzaro and arranged the 63 then known elements into a pattern. He was able to predict the existence of new and unknown elements where gaps appeared in the table. Here was a fruitful example of the power of models. What his work did was to raise an important question for later for atomic theory, namely where did atomic weights come from?

A Brief history of (models of) the atomA Brief history of (models of) the atom[6] At the start of the 20th century[6] At the start of the 20th century

Atoms were known to be electrically neutral, so the discovery

in 1897 of the electron by Thomson posed questions about the

structure of the atom. One proposal was the ‘plum pudding

model’ devised by Kelvin in 1902 which Thomson liked. The

positive charge was uniformly distributed and the electrons

embedded in it. An alternative was the ‘Saturnian’ model of

Nagaoka with electrons orbiting a positive center like rings

around Saturn. But Hertz had shown in 1887 that accelerating

charges radiate energy, so this model was unstable.

A Brief history of (models of) the atomA Brief history of (models of) the atom[7] Rutherford’s model[7] Rutherford’s model

Rutherford’s interpretation of the alpha-particle scattering

experiment showed that a new model of the atom was needed.

The positive charge had to be concentrated in a tiny nucleus and

the electrons had to be in some region around this nucleus. He

famously said about the unexpected scattering that it was as

unexpected as firing a fifteen inch naval shell at tissue paper and it

bouncing back to hit you. But orbiting electrons could not be stable

- they would radiate energy. This model accounted for the nucleus

but not the electron structure.

A Brief history of (models of) the atomA Brief history of (models of) the atom[8] X-ray vision[8] X-ray vision

Moseley and Bohr working with X-rays and analysing spectra led to Bohr in 1913 proposing a quantised shell model of electrons in atoms. This gave them stable orbits, but as yet there was no theory of why this was so and Bohr’s theory only worked for hydrogen and failed to explain some know properties of hydrogen spectra. Despite modifications to the Bohr model by others, it was clearly inadequate and by the 1920’s needed replacing.

A Brief history of (models of) the atomA Brief history of (models of) the atom[9] Enter Quantum Mechanics[9] Enter Quantum Mechanics

Dramatic conceptual developments enabled the creation of a model that was consistent with all of the experimental data for the first time. Strange notions such as the wave-particle duality of matter and the theory of wave-mechanics allowed for a model of the atom that made sense, even if it was impossible to picture using the ‘common sense’ ideas based in traditional understanding of the physical world. This new model was so radical that it overturned much conventional physics at the atomic level. Big names in this development include Compton, de Broglie, Schrödinger and Heisenberg.

A Brief history of (models of) the atomA Brief history of (models of) the atom[10] Post 1920[10] Post 1920

Experimental discoveries have caused atomic model makers to modify and extend the basic quantum model of the 1920’s. The discoveries of anti-particles, the neutron and a host of so-called fundamental particles, led to new theories of atoms and their constituents. Quantum field theory was needed to talk about interactions between particles. The realisation that protons and neutrons were themselves not the smallest indivisible particles (or waves!) has resulted in the exotic physics of quarks and theories of quantum chromodynamics alongside quantum electrodynamics. All of these represent developments of our model of the atom. Many of these models are now highly mathematical and impossible to represent in the diagrams familiar to school science. Newton might be pleased to note that God looks like he is indeed a mathematician!

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.

So what might this tell us So what might this tell us about models in science?about models in science?

There is an underlying conviction amongst virtually There is an underlying conviction amongst virtually all scientists that they are studying an independent all scientists that they are studying an independent reality. In this context, there is a belief that atoms reality. In this context, there is a belief that atoms are real. They are more than a useful device for are real. They are more than a useful device for controlling the world. In other words scientists are controlling the world. In other words scientists are realists not instrumentalists. Indeed most reflective realists not instrumentalists. Indeed most reflective scientists are critical realists - they accept that their scientists are critical realists - they accept that their models of reality, however good, are subject to models of reality, however good, are subject to modification in the light of new knowledge. Our modification in the light of new knowledge. Our models and theories are necessarily provisional.models and theories are necessarily provisional.