a bond-graph representation of a two-gimbal gyroscope

21
01-10-01 1 ICBGM’2001 A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two- Gimbal Gyroscope Robert T. Mc Bride Dr. François E. Cellier Raytheon Missile Systems, University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona Tucson, Arizona

Upload: raiden

Post on 11-Feb-2016

46 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope. Robert T. Mc BrideDr. François E. Cellier Raytheon Missile Systems, University of Arizona Tucson, ArizonaTucson, Arizona. ABSTRACT. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope

01-10-01 1

ICBGM’2001

A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope

Robert T. Mc Bride Dr. François E. Cellier

Raytheon Missile Systems, University of Arizona

Tucson, Arizona Tucson, Arizona

Page 2: A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope

01-10-01 2

ICBGM’2001

The purpose of this paper is to show, by example of a two-gimbal gyroscope, a method for developing a bond-graph representation of a system from the Lagrangian. Often the Lagrangian of a system is readily available from texts or other sources. Although the system equations can be derived directly from the Lagrangian there is still benefit in viewing the system in bond-graph representation. Viewing the power flow through the system gives insight into the inter-relationships of the state variables. This paper will give an example where the possibility of reducing the order of the system is obvious when viewing the system in bond-graph representation yet is not readily apparent when looking at the Lagrangian or the equations derived from the Lagrangian.

ABSTRACT

Page 3: A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope

01-10-01 3

ICBGM’2001

Summary of the Method.

•Note the flow terms in the Lagrangian.

•Derivate each of the terms of the Lagrangian with respect to time.

•Use bond-graph representation to complete the algebra of the equations derived above.

•All of the terms of the bond-graph are now present but further connections may be necessary to complete the bond-graph. These connections will be apparent by inspecting the terms of the Lagrange equations that are not yet represented by the bond-graph.

Page 4: A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope

01-10-01 4

ICBGM’2001

coscossin21 2222222 CCCBAAATL

The system to be modeled and its Lagrangian.

Page 5: A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope

01-10-01 5

ICBGM’2001

.cossinsinsin21

.cossincoscos21

.sincoscoscos21

.21

.21

22225

22224

23

22

21

BABABAdtdPower

CCCdtdPower

CCdtdPower

CCdtdPower

AAAAdtdPower

Derivate each of the Lagrangian terms to get power.

Page 6: A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope

01-10-01 6

ICBGM’2001List the 1-junctions with their corresponding I-elements.

Page 7: A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope

01-10-01 7

ICBGM’2001Add bonds to represent the algebra derived above.

Page 8: A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope

01-10-01 8

ICBGM’2001Add in the corresponding effort sources.

Page 9: A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope

01-10-01 9

ICBGM’2001

.cos]sin[cossin

.sin]cos[cossin

.sin]cos[sincos

25

24

3

BABACrossTermPower

CCCrossTermPower

CCCrossTermPower

The cross terms have not yet been represented in the bond-graph above.

Page 10: A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope

01-10-01 10

ICBGM’2001Add in the MGY connections.

Page 11: A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope

01-10-01 11

ICBGM’2001System Order Reduction

Page 12: A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope

01-10-01 12

ICBGM’2001

0 5 10 150

5

10

Nth

eta

(NM

)

0 5 10 150

5

10

Nph

i (N

M)

0 5 10 150

5

10

Time (sec.)

Nps

i (N

M)

Simulation Input Profiles

Page 13: A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope

01-10-01 13

ICBGM’2001

0 5 10 150

50

100

150

200

250

300

Time (sec.)

Thet

a (ra

d.)

Theta Profile

Page 14: A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope

01-10-01 14

ICBGM’2001

0 5 10 150

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Time (sec.)

Thet

adot

(rad

./sec

.)

Thetadot Profile

Page 15: A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope

01-10-01 15

ICBGM’2001

0 5 10 15-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Time (sec.)

Phi

dot (

rad.

/sec

.)

Phidot Profile

Page 16: A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope

01-10-01 16

ICBGM’2001

0 5 10 15-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

Time (sec.)

Psi

dot (

rad.

/sec

.)

Psidot Profile

Page 17: A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope

01-10-01 17

ICBGM’2001

0 5 10 15-1

0

1

2

3

4

5x 10

-4D

elta

The

ta (r

ad.)

Time (sec.)

Relative Error for Theta

Page 18: A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope

01-10-01 18

ICBGM’2001

0 5 10 15-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10x 10

-4

Time (sec.)

Del

ta T

heta

dot (

rad.

/sec

.)

Relative Error for Thetadot

Page 19: A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope

01-10-01 19

ICBGM’2001

0 5 10 15-3.5

-3

-2.5

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5x 10

-3

Del

ta P

hido

t (ra

d./s

ec.)

Time (sec.)

Relative Error for Phidot

Page 20: A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope

01-10-01 20

ICBGM’2001

0 5 10 15-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4x 10

-3

Del

ta P

sido

t (ra

d./s

ec.)

Time (sec.)

Relative Error for Psidot

Page 21: A Bond-Graph Representation of a Two-Gimbal Gyroscope

01-10-01 21

ICBGM’2001

•The information contained in the Lagrangian of the two-gimbal gyroscope can be used directly to obtain a bond-graph formulation of the system.

•The two-gimbal gyroscope bond-graph obtained in this paper provides a more compact construction than the bond-graph given by Tiernego and van Dixhoorn. The advantage that the Tiernego/van Dixhoorn representation has is one of symmetry in that the Eulerian Junction Structure (EJS) appears explicitly.

•A reduction in the state space of the gyroscope is possible by setting the effort source SE6, and the initial condition of P3, to zero. This reduction of order comes by direct inspection of the bond graph, yet is not readily apparent from the Lagrange equations.

•The simulation results for the Lagrange method and for the bond-graph are identical, baring small numerical differences. This result is fully expected since the bond-graph was obtained directly from the Lagrange equations.

Conclusions