a behavioral framework for compensation chapter 3 references: strategic compensation in canada (4th...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A Behavioral Framework for Compensation
Chapter 3
References:Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd.
Resource Person: Furqan-ul-haq Siddiqui
![Page 2: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Types of Reward Problems
1. Failure to produce desired behavior When reward system simply has no impact on
behavior In some cases reward system not only fails to
produce the desired behavior, but also produces undesirable behavior, or behaviors that leads to negative consequences
![Page 3: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
2. Production of desired behavior and undesirable consequences
A consumer goods company set the following rewards Marketing to increase sales R&D to secure more patents Production to minimize cost This reward system did: motivate marketing to increase sales Production department did minimize cost but did so by
using poor quality materials or by over simplifying R&D department did secure many patents , most of
these products had either no market or difficult to produce.
![Page 4: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
By rewarding mutually incompatible goals in situation where interdependence is high and cooperation is essential, the company is guaranteeing failure.
A reward system that looks reasonable when viewed in a narrow (departmental) context may in fact be very damaging.
A slightly different variation of reward problem occurs when the reward system does generate the rewarded behavior with no obvious negative consequence but serves to suppress other desirable behavior that are not measured or rewarded
If sales staff is are paid only on the basis of their individual sales, why would they want to spend time training possible competitor?
![Page 5: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
3. Production of Reward Dissatisfaction When employees believe that the rewards they
receive: are not consistent with the contribution they are
making to the organization, Are unfair. Reward dissatisfaction can result in a variety of
negative consequences such as: Poor work performance High turnover Poor customer service dishonesty
![Page 6: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Desired Reward Outcomesa. What outcomes should the reward system produce?
b. How can we produce them? Three Key Employee Behaviors
1. Membership Behavior When employee decides to join and remain with
the firm.
2. Task Behavior When employees produce the specific task that an
organization has assigned to them
![Page 7: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
3. Organizational Citizenship Behavior When an employee voluntarily undertake special
behaviors beneficial to the organization that go beyond simple membership and task behavior such as:
Extra efforts High cooperation with others High initiative High innovativeness Organizational citizenship is also known as
contextual performance in contrast to task performance
![Page 8: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
How to create reward system that create these behaviors?
Reward system does not affect human behavior directly. it:
i. Affects employee perception and attitudes,ii. Which drive their behavior. Three Key attitudes 1. Job satisfaction: The attitude one holds towards one’s job and work
place either positive or negative.2. Work Motivation: The attitude one holds towards good job performance
either positive or negative It is an strength of an employee’s desire to perform his
or her duties well
![Page 9: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
3. Organizational Identification• Organizational Identification (OID) is the sense of
oneness individuals have with an organization and the degree to which individuals define themselves as organization members.
Consists of three interrelated elementsi. A sense of shared goals and values with the
organizationii. A sense of membership or belongingness iii. An intention to remain a member of the
organization. This element is sometimes known as “organization Commitment”
![Page 10: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Causes of Reward Dissatisfaction
Violation of Psychological
Contract
Perceived Inequity
Relative Deprivation
Lack of organizational justice
Reward Dissatisfaction
![Page 11: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Causes of Reward Dissatisfaction1. Violation of the Psychological Contract Expectations about the rewards offered by a given job
and the contributions necessary to perform the job Research has shown that violation of psychological
contract can cause employees to have: Less trust on their employers Decreased job satisfaction Reduced citizenship behavior Decreased work performance Increased turnover, theft Even sabotage
![Page 12: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
2. Perceived Inequity Individuals use at-least two perceptual screens
i. An internal calculus, based on their own variations and the rewards received and contributions made
ii. Comparison with rewards/ contribution ratio of relevant others
The essence of equity theory is simple: people make comparison s between the ratio contributions they make and the rewards they receive and the ratios of relevant others.
![Page 13: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
3. Relative Deprivation Employees experience dissatisfaction with their pay
level under six conditions, whenI. There is a discrepancy between the outcome they want
and what actually they receiveII. They see that a comparison ”other” receives more than
they doIII. Past experience has led them to expect more than they
now receiveIV. Future expectancies for achieving better outcomes are
lowV. They feel they are entitled for moreVI. They absolve themselves of personal responsibility for
the lack of better outcomes
![Page 14: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
4. Lack of Organizational Justice Organizational justice has two main components
a. Distributive justice The perception that overall reward outcomes are
fair, which is what equity theory is all about
b. Procedural justice The perception that the process through which
rewards are determined is fair Unless people believe that both of these are fair,
they will not feel that the reward is fair
![Page 15: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Copyright (c) 2010 by Nelson Education Ltd15
Consequences of Reward Dissatisfaction:Employees have two main options to redress the imbalance
1. Attempt to increase the rewards they receive
![Page 16: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Copyright (c) 2010 by Nelson Education Ltd16
2. Attempt to Reduce Contributions
![Page 17: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
![Page 18: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Understanding Membership Behavior Why do people work? People accept employment I. They have unsatisfied needsII. If employment is seen the best vehicle to satisfy these needsIII.If they are able and willing to do things that the employment
require Put another way people accept a job if the inducements or
rewards associated with the job exceed the costs of contributions they have to make to secure and retain the job
People can value the same rewards, contribution differently, depending on their personal characteristics and circumstances
![Page 19: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Causes of Membership Behavior Factors that determine whether an employee is
going to stay with an employer on long term basis. Two job attitudes play an important role in causing
membership behavior.
1. Job Satisfaction
2. Organizational Commitment
![Page 20: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
It occurs when one’s important needs are satisfied through job.
there are five dimensions of job satisfaction
I. Satisfaction with pay
II. Satisfaction with Promotion
III.Satisfaction with supervision
IV.Satisfaction with coworkers
V. Satisfaction with the Job
1. Job Satisfaction
![Page 21: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
The strength of individual attachment to his or her organization
There are three main types of commitmenta. Affective Commitment Attachment to the organization based on positive feeling towards
the organizationb. Normative Commitment Commitment to a organization based on an ideology or a sense of
obligation. For example, the organization may have invested resources in training an employee who then feels a 'moral' obligation to put forth effort on the job and stay with the organization to 'repay the debt. It may also reflect an internalized norm, developed before the person joins the organization through family or other socialization processes, that one should be loyal to one's organization. The employee stays with the organization because he/she "ought to".
2. Organizational Commitment
![Page 22: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
c. Continuance Commitment Attachment to the organization based on perceived
lack of better alternatives Continuance commitment implies nothing about an
employee’s level of emotional attachment or that of employees level of job satisfaction
It is simply a hardheaded calculation that, “ I have no better alternative available to me.”
It is even possible that an employee might have high continuance commitment but extremely low levels of job satisfaction and affective commitment
![Page 23: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
The role reward system can play in generating job satisfaction and organizational commitment
Since rewards is any thing provided by the organization that satisfies person’s needs
Reward has a direct impact on job satisfaction To generate organizational commitment the key issue is
the relationship between employees and the organization as whole.
Psychological contract, trust, and organizational justice – especially procedural justice play a major role organizational commitment
Job security has also been found to relate to both job satisfaction and affective commitment.
Rewards, Satisfaction, and Commitment
![Page 24: A Behavioral Framework for Compensation Chapter 3 References: Strategic Compensation in Canada (4th Edition), Richard J. Long, Nelson Education Ltd](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062519/5697c0041a28abf838cc483d/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Money as a Motivator Human behavior is driven by needs, money itself is not
technically a need, but rather a generalized resource that can be exchanged for things that will satisfy needs
For those persons whose underlying needs are satisfied , money might not be much of a motivator, at least in its instrumental role as a vehicle for satisfaction of underlying need.
In its role a generalized resource gives them control over their needs will be satisfied. This sense of control is in fact an important intrinsic human need.
Money also has symbolic value and represent status and accomplishment to many people.
Money can also be seen as a source of social comparison where it is the relative amount, not absolute amount that is important to people.