a “good” plan is...1238 lim comments grouped into 54 issues at each rim, ~30 citizens invited to...

14

Upload: others

Post on 15-Feb-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • A “good” plan is:› a plan that works on paper…› …which is a function of good science

    The “right” plan is:› a plan that is supported by the public…› …which is a function of good process

  • Challenge: How to couple competent scientific analysis with legitimated public deliberation about water resource management strategies?

    Solution: Coupling should be recursive› Analysis used to inform deliberation› Deliberation used to frame analysis

  • Data

    Deliberation

    Analysis

    Plan

    frames informs

    Proactive Expert Role

    Reactive Expert Role

  • Data

    Deliberation

    Analysis

    Plan

    frames informs

    42 LIMs and 11 RIMs

  • Data

    Deliberation

    Analysis

    Plan

    frames informs12 Planning Workshops

    Supply-Demand-Infrastructure Analysis

    ManagementAlternatives Analysis

  • Data

    Deliberation

    Analysis

    Plan

    frames informs

    Town Hall and 11 Feedback

    Meetings

  • 1238 LIM comments grouped into 54 issuesAt each RIM, ~30 citizens invited to discuss these issues› Local stake, knowledgeable, committed to

    process, unique perspective, think broadlyDiscussants rated each issue as high or low for inclusion on the planning agenda (“TIA”)› Is the issue timely for planning?› Is the issue appropriate for planning?› Is the issue important for planning?Discussions followed by public comment

  • Infrastructure improvementsAvailability of water for economic developmentBalancing supply and demandWater sales and transfersHow to work with other statesHow to deal with region-specific needsPublic education about water conservationLand use effects on waterUnfunded mandates for water treatment

  • Effects of climate changeImproved water treatment technologyIncentives to promote conservationChanges to local agency jurisdictions/ operationsRevisions to OWRB permitting process to make it more efficientDifferences not attributable to regional characteristics; only who participated

  • Timeliness of considering tribal issues and research needsAppropriateness of considering tribal issues and changes to state agenciesImportance of hazards, public involvement, conflict resolution, enforcement consistencyPossible strategic objections to ground/surface water rights, conjunctive management, and water use prioritiesMost discussion on need for increased infrastructure capacity for fire fighting

  • Finish RIMs in November› RIM reports available at okwaterplan.infoIdentify workshop themes based on analysis of all RIM reportsRecruit workshop participantsTrain workshop facilitatorsIdentify workshop expertsPrepare and distribute workshop briefing documentsStart workshops in mid-2009

    Public Participation ProcessPlanning GoalsCoupling Good and RightA&D FrameworkStage 1: Agenda SettingStage 2: BrainstormingStage 3: RecommendationsUpdate on RIM SessionsPreliminary RIM FindingsRIM ProtocolConsensus High TIA RatingsTIA Differences Across RegionsMixed Ratings Within RegionsWhat’s Next?