9353

Upload: summerjenara

Post on 04-Jun-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    1/51

    1

    Field Research Methods

    Lecture 5:

    Interview Methodology

    Edmund Malesky, Ph.D., UCSD

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    2/51

    2

    Organization of Todays Lecture

    Maxims of Conversation

    The goals of interviewing

    Types of Interviews

    Methodological Process

    Post-Interview

    Coding

    Focus Groups

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    3/51

    Rules of Conversation

    Imagine what would happen to language if there

    were no rules to follow during conversations.

    Then it would be perfectly acceptable to follow Hi,how are you doing? with cars are typically made

    from steel, or to simply lie with every new

    statement. Communication would be impossible.

    It is clear that in normal conversation, we follow

    some general rules, inherited over time, that allow us

    to know what is acceptable and what isnt. 3

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    4/51

    Grices Conversation Maxims

    What are these rules?

    The first and most important is that both people

    in a conversation are cooperating. This is

    cooperation principle (first articulated byPhilosopher Paul Grice).

    Grice stipulated four maxims of conversation.

    Maxim of Quantity Maxim of Quality

    Maxim of Relevance

    Maxim of Manner4

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    5/51

    Maxim of Quantity

    Make your contribution to the conversation as informative as

    necessary.

    (i.e. dont say to little)

    Do not make your contribution to the conversation moreinformative than necessary.

    (i.e. dont say too much. Joe Biden, I am talking to you!!).

    The listener will assume that people are telling us everything we

    need to know. If they dont say something, then we assume theysimply dont know that information.

    A. John and Mary have 2 children.

    Are they planning on having a third?

    B. How did Harry fare in court the other day?

    Oh, he got a fine. But Harry actually got a life sentence as well!!5

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    6/51

    Maxim of Quality

    Do not say what you believe to be false

    (i.e. dont lie)

    Do not say that for which you lack adequate

    evidence (i.e. dont say things which you cant back up)

    6

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    7/51

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    8/51

    Maxim of Relevance

    Be relevant (i.e. say things related to the current topic ofresearch)

    Clearly, the most important maxim, since it is responsible for

    preventing random incoherent conversations lacking any

    continuity.

    i.e. a. Is Gail dating anyone these days?

    Well, she goes to Cleveland every weekend

    b. Isnt Larry the biggest jerk you ever met?

    Uh, it sure is nice this time of year, eh?

    The listener will assume these responses convey meaning.8

    http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=84011&title=john-bolton&byDate=true
  • 8/13/2019 9353

    9/51

    Reasons for Flouting a Maxim

    Someone actually may be trying to violate the overriding

    cooperative principle of the conversation.

    Signaling a violation (minor violation):

    A person might essentially come outand tell you they are violating the maxim and why. (The

    word on the street is I dont know if this is relevant,

    but

    Maxim Clash: A speaker might violate one maxim in

    order to preserve another.

    Carson is driving to Merediths house. He asks John,

    Where does Meredith live? John answers, Nevada. 9

    http://www.foundhistory.org/2007/04/06/john-bolton-john-stewart-doris-kearns-goodwin/http://www.foundhistory.org/2007/04/06/john-bolton-john-stewart-doris-kearns-goodwin/http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=84011&title=john-bolton&byDate=truehttp://www.foundhistory.org/2007/04/06/john-bolton-john-stewart-doris-kearns-goodwin/http://www.foundhistory.org/2007/04/06/john-bolton-john-stewart-doris-kearns-goodwin/
  • 8/13/2019 9353

    10/51

    Reasons for Flouting a Maxim

    To create a conversation implicature. By clearly and

    obviously violating a maxim, you can imply

    something beyond what you say.

    JOHN: Wheres Meredith?

    ELIZABETH: The control room or the science lab.

    Sarcasm:

    ELIZABETH: A lot of people are depending on you. MEREDITH: Thanks, that really takes the pressure off.

    10

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    11/51

    Reasons for Maxims

    Allow us to be more brief in communicating, since we dont

    need to say everything we would need to if we were being

    perfectly logical. (i.e. no need to say, John has 4 and only 4

    children.)

    Also, they allow us to say things indirectly to avoid some of the

    discomfort which comes from saying unpleasant things

    directly. (i.e. How does he look? He is a really nice guy?)

    They also allow us to insult/deride people indirectly without

    as much danger of confrontation.

    They allow us to imply dissatisfaction/anger without putting

    us in a position where we will have directly defend our views

    (often exploited).11

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    12/51

    Problems with the Maxims

    Not clear whether they apply to other

    languages and cultures.

    Some key concepts are undefined. A lot of

    intuition must be used to figure out, forexample, when a speaker is being irrelevant.

    They are not a complete listing (What about

    politeness?)

    There is some over-lap, so it not always clear

    what maxim is being violated.

    12

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    13/51

    1313

    Whyshouldwe care as interviewers?

    Remember respondents in an interview may deliberately avoidconversational maxims (i.e. not stating the maximum amount).Design your questions appropriately.

    Pay careful attention when a respondent clearly violates aconversation maxim information is being conveyed. Miss X has nice handwriting.

    Miss Singer produced a series of sounds correspondingly closelyto the score of an aria from Rigoletto.

    I dont pay bribes, but I will say that living standards ofbureaucrats have improved since my business opened.

    Remember that respondents will attempt to cooperate withambiguous or deceptive questions, attempting to guess themeaning of the question. Keep that in mind when interpretingresponses. (i.e. You may be getting exactly the response youasked them to give you!).

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    14/51

    14

    Why Interview?

    When interpersonal contact is important

    When you need more in-depth data

    When you need to have some follow-up

    When complex questions or behaviors need to

    be explored

    When you suspect other methods arent getting

    the whole picture

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    15/51

    15

    Advantages

    You get rich, detailed material

    You get the chance to go beyond the surface

    Interviewing yields new insights

    Participants describe what is important to them ratherthan being restricted to survey questions

    Provides high reliability - clarification of responses to

    increase the likelihood of useful information

    You can customize questions to the individual Data analysis can lead to quantitative assessments

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    16/51

    16

    Disadvantages

    Time consuming

    Responses are variable

    Interviewing effectively takes practice and

    experience

    Large amounts of information to reduce and

    analyze

    Less easily generalized Dependent on researchers personal attributes

    and skills

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    17/51

    17

    Types of Interviews

    1. The Structured Interview

    Essentially a face-to-face survey format with some open-ended questions.

    2. The Semi-Structured Interview

    Questions and prompts are designed ahead of time, but pace and questionordering are flexible, depending on the discussion and respondent.

    Interviewee is encouraged to expand on answers and express new informationthat the interviewee thinks is important.

    3. Free-flowing, open-ended conversations

    Informal in nature, the interviewer simply wants to allow the intervieweeexpound.

    4. Observational Interviews

    The context and surrounding are as important as the conversation.

    i.e. Following the a respondent through an average day.

    5. Focus Groups

    Multiple respondents are interviewed at the same time.

    The researcher is especially interested in the group interaction.

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    18/51

    18

    10 Steps in the Semi-Structured

    Process

    1. Define the Problem

    2. State your purpose

    3. Develop research questions

    4. Select a sample

    5. Perform the interview

    6. Transcribe your data

    7. Analyze your data

    8. Report your findings

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    19/51

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    20/51

    20

    Statement of Purpose

    This should be a clearly written, concise

    statement that you can show to respondents

    and institutional sponsors.

    What information do you plan to obtain fromthe process?

    How long will it take?

    How will the information be used? Confidentiality requirements.

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    21/51

    21

    Selectinga Sample - What you need out the

    interview will determine who you sample. Are you looking for generalizable patterns?

    You will need to use some of the sampling procedures next week

    In the case of a small-n, you should use a most similar matching technique.

    If you are looking for detailed information from experts nested inside largerunits (mayors in cities; CEOs in companies; principals in schools), you shouldmatch at the second level.

    Semi-structured interviews will always involve less respondents than asurvey. Nevertheless, the rules of selection and non-response bias still apply,even though there is a small-n.

    Qualitative research can be fruitful, but it is not a synonym for sloppy.

    Do you need deep information from the few acknowledged experts in thearea.

    Talk to as many as time and budget allow. Sampling is not as important. Are you tracking down a particular case or journalistic-style story?

    Treat the process like an investigative journalist. Talk to key players, learnmore, and add new respondents to your list (snowball sampling).

    Remember, that respondents in this type of interview settings have agendas.Try to cover all sides of the story. Do not let narratives from particular

    respondents drive your analysis.

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    22/51

    22

    Selecting a Sample

    Obtaining Agreement Send a letter explaining the goals of the research and requesting participation.

    Letterhead from a locally reputable and neutral organization is helpful.

    In developing countries, it often helps to have a local sponsor, who can writeletters of introduction for you.

    Be Persistent

    Follow up with phone calls

    multiple phone calls (Rivera et alfound in Russia that it took 15-20 calls) Patiently, reiterate the goals of the research.

    Build Networks

    When you are new to a locality, it always helps to spend some time buildingnetworks.

    In Vietnam, my most important research instruments still are my tennisracquet, soccer cleats, and tolerance for bia hoi.

    Blindingly Obvious, but nonetheless important.

    Dress appropriately for the interview (Even today, I wear glasses for eliteinterviews in SE Asia or respondents dont take me seriously).

    Be courteous to staff, respondents

    Make sure the respondent understands your neutrality.

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    23/51

    23

    Realize that there will likely be some sort of selection

    bias in getting interviews.

    Analyze the direction of the bias.

    In the Rivera et al reading, I was bothered by thisstatement: Most failures to interview respondents stemmed from a

    problem endemic to all elite interviewing the extraordinarily

    busy lives of the respondents (Respondents were particularly

    busy because the 1996 presidential campaign was in fullswing.

    Selectinga Sample

    Analyzing bias

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    24/51

    24

    ObtainingConsent

    Check with your Institutional Review Board or

    perhaps even the City Attorney to insure the safety of

    your subjects

    Be especiallycareful if interviewing children

    The Consent Form must be signed and dated before

    the interview can begin

    Interviewees have the option of stopping the

    interview at any time if they feel uncomfortable

    Specify how data is to be used and whether is will be

    used confidentially or anonymously

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    25/51

    25

    Semi-StructuredQuestions

    Your survey form should have a mix of some closed and open-endedquestions.

    Weight more heavily toward open-ended, as this is really the goal of theapproach.

    Allow your respondents to elaborate, but reign them in when necessary.

    Have a pre-programmed list of wranglingphrases (i.e. Could wereturn to?; That is fascinating, but I want to make sure I understand better)

    Build conversational bridges between subjects directly into the surveyscript. (Your answer leads me to wonder.; We have discussed howpolicy is made, now lets step back to the motivations of policymakers.)

    Many of the question rules of survey design continue to apply.

    Avoid double-barreled questions.

    Define complex terms carefully

    Dont editorialize.

    Dont trap respondents into particular answers.

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    26/51

    26

    Additional Questions Types in

    Interviews Grand Tour Questions

    Could you describe a typical day in your office?

    Walk me through the stages of the business registration process

    Take me through the legal drafting process in your country.

    Asking for examples These help elucidate complex points and add color.

    They also help break a respondent out of a message track. Prompts/Probes /Follow-ups

    Can be built into survey and spontaneous

    Can be oral or physical (the blank look, arched eye brows).

    The intentionally incorrect statement

    State a law or fact incorrectly and gauge the respondents reaction.

    Innocuous, but enlightening questions

    Sometimes it helps to avoid asking a sensitive question, when you can getthe same information with a seemingly innocuous question.

    i.e. Gauging dual subordination in Vietnam how many times do you meetwith Party Secretary?

    What did you do this morning? Rather than, Did you eat breakfast?

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    27/51

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    28/51

    28

    The Sawatsky Method Dos

    Start questions with what, how and why; They demand the most from sources, requiring them to describe causes (what

    happened?), processes (how did it happen?) and motivation (why did you do it?). Fillin the blanks with questions beginning with who, where and when.

    Probe tough issues, don't ask tough-sounding questions.

    Keep in mind: Less is more. Short questions produce succinct, dramatic, focused responses. Long rambling

    questions get long rambling answers or curt, confused replies. Strategize. How will you build innocuous questions into your approach?

    Establish agreement. Without agreement on basic facts, you will spend most of the interview trying to force

    the respondent to accept your version of events, usually resorting to coercion andleading questions.

    Build the interview on answers, not questions.

    People find it easier to volunteer than to admit. When the source makes an originalassertion, follow up with a question asking for evidence to support it.

    Put the burden of proof on the source.

    If a source insists, "There was no crime," ask, "How do you know that?" If a source says,"I can't remember" ask, "Why can't you remember?"

    To focus questions, pick a key phrase the source mentioned and repeat it in an open-ended question. If, in describing his marriage, Ted Kennedy says, "We've had difficulttimes," respond: "What do you mean by difficult times?"

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    29/51

    29

    The Sawatsky Method Donts

    When attempting to acquire more information and not generalize,avoid closed-ended questions. Mr. President, did you sleep with thatwoman? Did you authorize the leak?

    Don't make a statement instead of asking a question.

    Instead of asking: "It must have been tough in the early years," ask:"What were the early years like?"

    Don't ask double-barreled questions or two questions at once. Don't overload questions.

    Don't put comments into questions.

    "What would go through your mind in the quiet times? Because theremust have been times when you didn't talk to each other."

    Don't use trigger or loaded words in questions.

    "Your scheme would allow for a huge windfall to oil companies..." Don't use hyperbole in questions.

    Sources nearly always make up for a lack of neutrality bycounteracting overblown questions with modest responses.

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    30/51

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    31/51

    31

    Observation

    Record your observations of the context of the

    interview.

    What is the setting like?

    Watch how respondent behaves withcolleagues, family

    Fenno gives some excellent examples of how to

    do this appropriately. But remember

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    32/51

    32

    Effects of Observation

    "What we observe is not nature itself, but

    nature exposed to our method ofquestioning (Heisenberg)"

    - In the process of observing an experimental setting,

    we may accidentally alter the environment around us.

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    33/51

    33

    Interviewing Kit

    Consent Forms

    Digital Recorder/Extra Batteries

    Extension cord

    Interview guide

    Pad

    Pen

    Water

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    34/51

    34

    Recording the Interview

    (Options) Only take notes

    Can be difficult to be responsive, especially ifyou are not operating in your native language.

    Have an assistant take notes Useful, but intense training will be necessary.

    Tape the interview recommended ifrespondent allows and you dont think it impair

    information. Purchase a tape recorder that is of a good

    quality and has transcription capabilities.

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    35/51

    35

    Interview Preparation

    Schedule times with interviewees, you need

    about an hour

    Interview room should be private, comfortable,

    free of distraction and easily accessible. Turn off your phones

    Seat yourselves to encourage involvement

    Test your equipment before the interviewstarts

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    36/51

    36

    Post-Interview

    Put thoughts and questions into a reflexive

    journal

    Transcribe tapes

    Take out identifying information

    Code transcription

    If you have questions concerning clarification,

    contact the interviewee Erase tapes as specified in consent form

    Secure transcripts

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    37/51

    37

    Triangulate after the Interview

    After the interview, find ways to verify theinformation given to you.

    If a respondent said they were at a meeting, doarchival research to see if you can get a list ofattendees.

    If a respondent mentions a particular law ordecree, get a copy for yourself.

    If a respondent mentions a particular location,visit and verify the description (i.e. IRA attacks)

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    38/51

    38

    Initial Coding

    Coding text of the transcript means to break the textdown into small, meaningful units by assigning labelsto the unit

    Use the smallest unit possible Look for data pertinent to answering the research

    questions

    Units may have multiple codes associated with them

    Also look for new ideas or concepts to explore

    Initially, dont worry about making relationshipsbetween the codes

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    39/51

    39

    Developing Themes: The best of quotations are no

    substitutefor thinking and formulating themes

    After initial coding you should start to see repeatingthemes. Repeating ideas lead to Themes which lead toConclusions

    Sort the coded units according to these themes

    Assess the topics by asking Does everything in thistopic belong here? Can some of the topics be combined?Can some topics be deleted because they dont relate tothe research questions or because they dont havemuch data in them?

    Develop a conceptual schema, or dimensions, for thedata

    The schema can have major and minor themes within it

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    40/51

    40

    Coding Methods

    Traditional is by reproducing unit on an indexcard and grouping cards into categories andthemes

    Qualitative software has taken the place oftraditional methods

    Same concept except faster, more convenientand with greater analysis power

    NVivo, NUD*IST, N6, Atlas.ti are the mostpopular coding and analysis software programs(At least this is what my anthropology studentstell me).

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    41/51

    41

    Reporting

    After the themes are developed start a narrative thatexplains the properties and dimensions of thecategories and the circumstances under which they areconnected

    Findings, conclusions, recommendations, futureresearch provide a context for understanding theconditions under which the results were obtained

    Remember to present information in a way that isverifiable and falsifiable.

    Report findings as they relate to each research questiondont be shy

    What is the contribution of this study to knowledge andpractice? What improvements can be made?

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    42/51

    42

    Ethics

    Assure respondent of your neutrality

    Assure respondent of confidentiality.

    If using experimental methods, make sure

    respondent is debriefed.

    Consider how you will present information, so

    as not to embarrass or damage the careers of

    your confidantes.

    Send copies of your work to all those who

    participated.

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    43/51

    d

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    44/51

    How do Focus Groups Compare

    to Survey Methods?

    Insight not rules (patterns)

    Social not individual (you are specifically

    interested in how the interactions lead to

    answers) Homogenous not diverse (too much diversity

    can destroy inference)

    Warm not hot (Produce conversation that

    border on intimacy, not conflict)

    Words not numbers. (Report results in prose.

    Frequencies make no sense in this context.

    They are not independent draws).44

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    45/51

    Traditional Focus Groups

    8-12 participants

    Under direction of trainedmoderator

    Formal, directive, structured

    60-150 minutes

    Recorded, supplemented by field notes

    Observed by scientific team

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    46/51

    Traditional Focus Groups

    Participants

    Break characteristics populations

    Control characteristics

    # & nature of groups & sessions Purpose

    Design complexity

    Break characteristics

    Resources

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    47/51

    Data Qualitative/Textual

    Tape recordings

    Transcriptions

    2 hour session: 40 to 50 pages

    Field notes

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    48/51

    Data Analysis

    Driven by underlying research question

    Qualitative Interpretive, constrained by context

    Topics linked to group guidelines

    Steps Mechanical organizing, subdividing

    Interpretive developing subdivisions (code mapping), searchfor patterns within subdivisions, drawing meaningfulconclusions

    Software: e.g.,The Ethnograph; Atlas.ti; QSR N6 Reliability

    Repeated review of data

    Independent analysis by > two experienced analysts

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    49/51

    Strengths & Limitations

    Focus group methodology is only as useful and as

    strong as its link to the underlying research

    question and the rigor with which it is applied.

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    50/51

    Strengths

    Provides concentrated amounts of rich data, in

    participants own words, on precisely the topic

    of interest

    Interaction of participants adds richness to the

    data that may be missed in individual

    interviews

    Provides critical information in development ofhypotheses or interpretation of quantitative

    data

  • 8/13/2019 9353

    51/51

    Limitations

    Small number of participants

    Limited generalizability

    Group dynamics can be a challenge

    Particularly if moderator is inexperienced

    Interpretation

    Time-consuming

    Requires experienced analysts