8th annual shock wave/boundary layer interaction technical interchange meeting 14 april, 2015...
TRANSCRIPT
8th Annual Shock Wave/Boundary Layer Interaction Technical Interchange Meeting14 April, 2015
Inward-Turning Inlets for Low-Boom / Low-Drag Applications
Chuck TrefnyJohn SlaterSam Otto
NASA Glenn Research Center
Outline
Motivation
Inward-Turning Inlets and Streamline Tracing
Slater’s “STEX” Inlets
New Flowfield Architecture and Otto’s Merging Procedure
Mach 1.7 Inlet Design and Preliminary CFD Results
Proposed 8x6 Test
Slater Introduces Inward-Turning “STEX” Inlets (2014)
Axisymmetric Spike Two-DimensionalAxisymmetric Pitot STEX-Circular STEX-Flattop
Encouraging preliminary results, but distortion levels were higher than desired...
Supersonic compression surface is generated by tracing streamlines through an inward-turning “parent” flowfield
“Inward-Turning” Inlets
Busemann (1942) “conical” compression
“Inward-Turning” Inlets
Supersonic compression surface is generated by tracing streamlines through an inward-turning “parent” flowfield
Streamlines are traced from an arbitrary “tracing curve” in a plane at the compression field exit, forward to freestream conditions
Supersonic compression surface is generated by tracing streamlines through an inward-turning “parent” flowfield
Streamlines are traced from an arbitrary “tracing curve” in a plane at the compression field exit, forward to freestream conditions
The resulting inlets are inherently “internal compression” and would exhibit nonlinear “start/unstart” flow phenomena
Off-axis placement of the tracing curve mitigates “starting” issue
“Inward-Turning” Inlets
Streamline-traced shape from circular tracing curve
Leading ray of Busemann compression is a Mach wave at freestream conditions and zero deflection angle
Length of full Busemann flowfield is prohibitive, many truncation studies in the literature for the hypersonic application
For the low-boom application, initial inward deflection is required to reduce or eliminate the external nacelle angle, drag, and boom
Truncation of the Busemann Flowfield is Required
”STEX” Inlet Design Procedure
Initial cowl angle imposed, and blended into stream-traced contour
Terminal shock forced by back-pressure
Uniform, isentropic properties of parent flowfield compromised
Modified design procedure is proposed to improve recovery and distortion...
New Parent Flowfield Architecture
Include leading oblique wave in parent flowfield
Terminal shock also included in parent flowfield by using “strong” oblique wave as Busemann exit shock
Internal Conical Flow A (Molder, 1967)
Solution to the Taylor-Maccoll equations marching downstream from oblique wave to a singular point
Conditions on the singular ray must be merged with the truncated Busemann flowfield
“ICFA” flowfield nomenclature
Merging of ICFA and Busemann Flowfields
Mach number, ray angle, and flow deflection angle on the ICFA singular ray cannot all be matched to a Busemann truncation ray
Flow non-uniformity depends on approach to merging...
Merging Approach 1Match Mach number and flow deflection angle
Merging Approach 2 (You, et al., 2009)Match Mach number and ray angle
Merging Approach 3Match ICFA expanded Mach number and ray angle
Merging Approach 3Final Design – Reduce Exit Mach Number
Streamline-Traced Contour from Merging Approach 3
Traced from circular throat, tangent to parent flowfield axis
Focal Point
Parent Flowfield Axis
Modifications to the Native Geometry for Viscous Effects
Compression surface displaced outward to accommodate boundary-layer displacement thickness
“Shoulder” rounded to ease shock interaction and provide better off-design performance
“Vent Region” modified to facilitate starting and sub-critical spillage
“Vent Region” Modification“Native” Geometry
Subsonic Diffuser and Nozzle Added for RANS Simulation
Summary of Inlet Performance Based on RANS Solutions
RANS Simulation of Back-Pressure Effect – No Bleed
a
d
c
b
Bleed Simulation in RANS Solutions
RANS Simulation of Back-Pressure Effect ~2% Bleed
a
d
c
b
Summary
New design scheme for inward-turning, low-boom inlets developed with leading shock included in parent flowfield, and “strong” terminal oblique wave
Analytical merging of ICFA and Busemann flows validated by Euler analysis
Mach 1.7 design validated with 3-D Turbulent RANS
Roughly 2% boundary-layer bleed improved recovery to MIL-E-5007D
Non-linearity noted in sub-critical characteristics in bleed case
8x6 test proposed for experimental validation
Objectives of Proposed 8x6 Wind-Tunnel Testing
Validate the effects of bleed and other boundary-layer control schemes such as vortex generators on overall inlet performance
Better understanding of non-linear sub-critical phenomena
Determine tolerance to angles of attack and yaw
Determine off-design Mach number performance
Back-Up
STEX Inlet Design Procedure
Initial cowl angle imposed, and blended into stream-traced contour
Terminal shock forced by back-pressure
Uniform, isentropic properties of parent flowfield compromised
Modified design procedure is proposed to improve recovery and distortion...
Initial deflection results in a curved shock wave and Mach disk at the parent flowfield axis
Conditions downstream of the non-isentropic shock wave cannot match those of the conical flow on any ray
Parent flowfield is compromised resulting in total pressure loss and non-uniform flow at the exit
Simple Truncation Results in Non-Uniform Flow
Design Space – Recovery vs. Length
Design Space – Recovery vs. Outflow Mach
Reimbursable program in late FY15 NASA is modifying existing adapter to include AIP instrumentation Cold-pipe and mass flow plug are existing Opportunity to test NASA configuration as follow-on
NASA Inlet Adapter Cold-Pipe Mass Flow Plug
Opportunity to Leverage Aerion Test
Schedule and Budget
Two-week test begins 12 mo. from go-ahead
Final report 18 mo. from go-ahead
ROM cost for fab and test based on similar, recent 8x6 tests: $1.5M