87521848

Upload: kimsha-concepcion

Post on 13-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 87521848

    1/15

    InternatIonal Journalof IntellIgent technologIes andapplIed statIstIcs

    Vol .6, no.1 (2013) pp .51-64, DOI: 10.6148/IJITAS.2013.0601.03

    Airiti Press

    *Corresponding author: [email protected]

    Evaluate the Employability of Higher Education by

    Fuzzy DataWen-Tsung Lai

    1*and Tsung-kuo Tien-Liu

    2

    1De partment o f Educational Policy and Administration, National Chi N an University , N antou, T aiwan

    2

    Center f or General Education, N ational Chi Nan U niversity, Nantou, Taiwan

    ABSTRACT

    The purpose of this study is to construct a new method used in evaluating the demand and

    supply employability of higher education. The samples are 40 university graduates within one

    year from a department of a private university. The research method uses rule-base system to

    calculate the fuzzy-related membership function value and to do decision making about the

    demand and supply employability of higher education. And survey by fuzzy two-dimensional

    questionnaire. The results of this study are to construct the new model to evaluate the

    demand and supply employability of higher education by fuzzy data. Therefore, new model

    can apply to evaluate the demand and supply employability of one university by testing

    all departments .Advanced application to evaluate the demand and supply employability of

    higher education of one country by testing all universities.

    K eywords: Higher education; Rule-base system; Fuzzy two-dimensional questionnaire;

    Employability

    1. Introduction

    According to the statistics of the Ministry of Education [23] data, the population

    over the age 15 of Taiwan university graduates were 6.08% in 1990. But af ter 20

    years, it had increased to 25.11% in 2010. There were 167 colleges or universities in

    2012, and the university admitted rate are 100%. When the university graduates are

    increasing, but they has not been synchronized to enhance students professionalperformance. Future employment and national talent cultivation is a major worry

    for graduates.

    Higher education emphasis on the employability of graduates in the world in

    recent years. Employment setbacks encountered to reduce the university graduates

    in the labor market. Governments began to actively promote the reform policy. In

    addition to the proposed economic stimulus plan, the content of school education

  • 7/27/2019 87521848

    2/15

    52 Lai and Tien-Liu

    conducted adjusts its strategic. Courses taught by the school can be more close to thedirection of social change, and professionals to meet truly the industry. European

    Higher Education Area In 2010 to confirm to enhance the employability of European

    citizens as the goal of the reform of higher education. British HEFCE committed

    between 2002 and 2005 in the core skills of analysis and interpretation. The United

    States is actively studying what university graduates workplace essential skills.

    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in 2001 pointed

    out that the core of the most important employers skills. Employability Skills for the

    Future published in Australia 2002 that employability was divided into 8 categories.

    For the 11 countries in the European research team conducted Careers after Higher

    Education -- A European Research Survey, the CHEERS survey research, graduates

    should have the 32 kinds of ability. The Hong Kong UGC accounted to universityfunding in the years 2008 to 2011 base on graduates performance.

    College graduates employment force survey report of National Youth

    Commission, Executive Yuan in 2006, and employability concluded three kinds

    of capacity, Work attitude and cooperative ability, Career planning and learning

    enterprising capacity, Professional knowledge and applicative capacity. But how to

    implement the graduate employability as an important indicator of school evaluation

    efforts should be made in the direction of Taiwans education authorities. Higher

    education must to assess the effectiveness in Taiwan. They contains the assessment

    of over-assessment in higher education, the assessment of the quality of university

    education, assessment of graduate employability. How to construct a system both to

    evaluate over-education and quality of employability is the most important motive

    in this study.

    For the purposes of local appropriation, this study cited college graduate

    employment force survey report of National Youth Commission, Executive Yuan

    in 2006 [24]. The index concluded three items, Work attitude and cooperative

    ability, Career planning and learning enterprising capacity, Professional knowledge

    and applicative capacity (1) Work attitude and cooperative ability concluded

    good working attitude, stability and resistance to stress, teamwork abilities,

    understand and abide by professional ethics and moral. (2) Career planning and

    learning enterprising capacity concluded willingness to learn and plasticity, career

    planning capacity, understanding of the industry environment and development,job search and self-marketing capability, innovation capability, leadership abilities.

    (3) Professional knowledge and applicative capacity concluded presentation and

    communication ability, to explore and solve the problem capacity, professional

    knowledge and skills, basic computer application skills, foreign language ability, able

    to theories applied to practice.

  • 7/27/2019 87521848

    3/15

    53Evaluate the Employability of Higher Education by Fuzzy Data

    2. Literature review

    2.1 Over education

    2.1.1 Measurement method of over education

    Over-education commonly used measurement of the f ollowing three ways by

    worker education level. (1) Worker self-assessment: Many scholars measure Over-

    education by Worker self-assessment. Listed as the following: Alba-Ramrez [1];

    Bchel and van Ham [3]; Dolton and Vignoles [9]; Duncan and Hoffman [10]; Hersch

    [15]; McGuinness [21-22]; Sloane et al. [28]; Sicherman [29]. (2) Job analysis: Many

    scholars measure Over-education by job analysis. Listed as the following: Burris [4];Chevalier [6]; Decker et al. [8]; Groot and Maassen van den Brink [12]; Hartog and

    Oosterbeek [14]; Kiker et al [17]; McGoldrick and Robst [20]; Rumberger [27]; Thurow

    [30]. (3) Means of realized matches: Many scholars measure Over-education by means

    of realized matches. Listed as the following: Bauer [2]; Groot [11]; Groot and Maassen

    van den Brink [12]; Patrinos [25]; Verdugo and Verdugo [31].

    2.2.2 Researchs of over education

    Xiao [34] regarding wage function, Qualification Model is less significant

    models. This indicates that personal view decides whether education influences

    wage or not. If taking the method of employers evaluation or the method of job

    analysis as a reference for Qualification Model, it will make Qualification Model

    become more reliable. Carrolla and Tani [5] find a notable age-related effect not

    reported in earlier studies. Young over-educated graduates were not penalized

    after unobserved heterogeneity had been addressed, whereas older over-educated

    graduates were at an earnings disadvantage relative to their well-matched peers.

    Keywords: over-education; graduate labor market; human capita. Yang [35] find: (1)

    polytechnic college graduates perform low in wage where their among four school

    types, degree of over-education tends to be higher than university graduates. (2) The

    over-education has negative impact on wage, and such effect varies by school type.

    However, such effect is not significant in male sample. (3) Wage differs by gender.However, it doesnt make difference between male and female by Jensen over-

    education index. (4) The learning at school variables will significantly affect wage

    and the degree of over-education. College graduates in sciences tend to have the

    highest wage among different fields of graduates; however they also suffer the most

    serious degree of over-education.

    2.2 Rule-base system

    Rule is a natural knowledge representation, in the form of the If Then

  • 7/27/2019 87521848

    4/15

    54 Lai and Tien-Liu

    structure and rule base system (RBS) is popular for real applications among expertsystems. RBS consists of two components, inf erence engine and assertions. The

    assertions can be divided into a set of facts and a set of rules that can be f ired by

    patterns in facts. The inference engine, an interpreter of an RBS, uses an iterative

    match-select-act cycling model. In act phase of the cycle, a fired rule may modify or

    generate some facts. CLIPS, one of the most successful expert system shell, which

    allows a knowledge base to be partitioned into modules, provides a feature called

    defmodule, and provides a more explicit method for controlling the execution of

    a system. Each module is able to inference sequentially and independently by

    inference engine. Different domain knowledge can be placed in different modules

    created by defmodule functions. Logically, related rules and facts can be collected

    into one module, which provides better maintenance and performance.RBS has many advantages [26]. The f irst is naturalness of expression since

    experts rely on rules rather than on textbook knowledge. The second is modularity

    that permits RBS easy to construct, to debug, and to maintain. Restricted syntax

    and ability of explanation are also the advantages of RBS. Although RBS is

    powerful enough in many applications, it has several disadvantages in maintenance

    and construction, e.g. the weak ability of incremental construction of knowledge

    [18]. Accordingly, many researches aim to integrate object-oriented and rule-based

    programming paradigms to take advantage of the technology. There are two

    paradigms on the integration of objects and rules: incorporating rules into objects

    and embedding objects into rules. Knowledge objects are an integration of the object-

    oriented paradigm with logic rules [32]. Furthermore, many rule-base tools, which

    cooperate with the technology, are developed, e.g., COOL (CLIPS object-oriented

    language) [7].

    3. Research method

    3.1 Evaluating higher education employability based on the supply and

    demand

    In order to understand the relationship between supply and demand of the

    higher education employability, firstly we use the concept of logistics in marketing,to analyze demand and supply of higher education employability. When the

    employability is not balanced there will be in short supply, oversupply two kinds of

    cases. The goal of the high education balanced development including: (1) To f ind

    higher education employability rule-based and multiple decision-making system. (2)

    If higher education employability demand is greater than supply, then we should

    promote the policy to bridge the gap between course demand and supply. (3) When

    the higher education employability demand is less than supply, we should reform

    the policy and consider.

  • 7/27/2019 87521848

    5/15

    55Evaluate the Employability of Higher Education by Fuzzy Data

    3.2 What is a rule-base system?

    In computer science, rule-base systems are used as a way to store and manipulate

    knowledge to interpret information in a useful way. They are often used in

    artificial intelligence applications and research. Rule-base systems can be used in an

    expert system might help a doctor choose the correct diagnosis. Also known as the

    knowledge base, knowledge is stored as rules in the rule-base. Rules are of the f orm.

    The rule-base system of higher education in the educational strategies of

    employability is a method of finding a rule in a rule-base. We can express the

    matching policies are as follows:

    Consists of arule-base(permanent data); IF some condition THEN some action [13,

    16]. Therefore, the rule-base of the higher education in the educational strategies ofemployability supply and demand model is set up as below [19]:

    Rule 1: If 0.5 Demand Supply 1, we will substantially reform the educational

    strategies of employability.

    Rule 2: If 0.1 < Demand Supply 0.5, we will moderately reform the educational

    strategies of employability.

    Rule 3: If 0 < Demand Supply 0.1, we will minutely reform the educational

    strategies of employability.

    Rule 4: If -0.1 < Demand Supply 0, we will minutely maintain the educational

    strategies of employability.

    Rule 5: If -0.5 < Demand Supply -0.1, we will moderately maintain the

    educational strategies of employability.

    Rule 6: If -1 < Demand Supply -0.5, we will substantially maintain the

    educational strategies of employability.

    3.3 Using of the index of demand and supply in this study

    For the purposes of local appropriation, this study cited college graduate

    employment force survey report of National Youth Commission, Executive Yuan

    in 2006 [24]. The index concluded three items, Work attitude and cooperative

    ability, Career planning and learning enterprising capacity, Professional knowledge

    and applicative capacity. (1) Work attitude and cooperative ability concludedgood working attitude, stability and resistance to stress, teamwork abilities,

    understand and abide by professional ethics and moral. (2) Career planning and

    learning enterprising capacity concluded willingness to learn and plasticity, career

    planning capacity, understanding of the industry environment and development,

    job search and self-marketing capability, innovation capability, leadership abilities.

    (3) Professional knowledge and applicative capacity concluded presentation and

    communication ability, to explore and solve the problem capacity, professional

    knowledge and skills, basic computer application skills, foreign language ability, able

    to theories applied to practice.

  • 7/27/2019 87521848

    6/15

    56 Lai and Tien-Liu

    3.4 To survey by fuzzy two-dimensional questionnaire

    We will put these two parts of compensation by addition. While inside these

    two factors, we would like to take it by the production. Since inside the factors, the

    variables are highly co-integrated.

    In this research, we take two dimensional fuzzy data: the weight Xdenote

    by U,w(X) as well as the memberships of satisfactory U, s(y1, y2, y3, y4, y5). y1 =

    very unsatisf actory, y2=unsatisf actory, y3= medium, y4= satisfactory, y5= very

    satisfactory denote byU,s(Y) for the questionnaires on the discussion domain U=

    {exercise/games, art/music, leisure/tourism, religion}. Hence a random fuzzy sample

    for a two dimensional case can be written as

    Index of Individual leisure Activities ILA = ;Where (xi,yi) is the samplefor weight and memberships (degree of satisfactory of the linguistic variables),

    is the degree of satisfactory

    for factors in the universe domain,j (xi) is the weight of the factor j.

    In order to find the general index of leisure activities for population, we just

    calculate the mean of the sample ILAthrough population, that is, general Leisure

    Activities GILA= .From the above definition we can find that, 0 ILA 1,0 TILA 1.

    Example 3.1: Suppose there are three principles are doing the survey. They are

    asked to write down the weight as well as the degree of satisfactory based on the

    factors of the discussion domain. Table 1 shows the result [33].

    Table 1.School leaders leisure activity indicators of fuzzy weight.

    Leisure

    Activity

    Exercise/games

    (w; (1, 2, 3, 4, 5))

    Art/music

    (w; (1, 2, 3, 4, 5))

    Entertainment/

    tourism

    (w; (1, 2, 3, 4, 5))

    Religion

    (w; (1, 2, 3, 4, 5))

    U,A (X , Y), (.4; (0, 0, 0, .5, .5)) (.3; (0, 0, .5, .5, 0)) (.2; (0, 0, 1, 0, 0)) (.1; (0, 0, .8, .2, 0))

    U,B (X , Y), (.1; (.8, .2, 0, 0, 0)) (.1; (0, 0, 1, 0, 0)) (0; (0, 0, 0, 1, 0)) (.8; (0, .0, 0, .4, .6))

    U,C(X , Y), (.2; (.4, .4, 0, .2, 0)) (.2; (0, 0, 0, .5, .5)) (.5; (0, 0, .8, .2, 0)) (0; (0, 0, 1, 0, 0))

    Fuzzy M ean (.23; (.4, .2, 0, .23, .17)) (.2; (0, 0, .5, .33, .17)) (.23; (0, 0, .6, .4, 0)) (.3; (1, 0, .6, .2, .2))

  • 7/27/2019 87521848

    7/15

    57Evaluate the Employability of Higher Education by Fuzzy Data

    4. Empirical study

    The samples are 40 university graduates within one year from a department

    of national university. This study tests all 40 university graduates within one year

    from 2009 graduates of the Department of Business Administration, Particular

    central Taiwan University of Science and Technology. Conducted a general survey

    of 40 questionnaires, 32 were recovered, recovery rate of 80%. We got the last 30

    valid questions after excluding invalid questionnaires. To Survey by fuzzy two-

    dimensional questionnaire select will be discovery of new operation and strategy

    methods. The excepted results: to construct the new model to evaluate the

    employability of higher education by fuzzy data.

    4.1 The quiz scale of employability

    The quiz scale of employability cited from the College graduate employment

    force survey report of National Youth Commission, Executive Yuan in 2006.It

    concluded three items, Work attitude and cooperative ability, Career planning

    and learning enterprising capacity, Professional knowledge and applicative

    capacity.They show in Table 2.

    Table 2.College graduate employment f orce survey report of National Youth

    Commission, Executive Yuan in 2006.

    Category

    Work Attitude

    and Cooperative

    Ability

    Career Planning

    and Learning

    Enterprising Capacity

    Professional Knowledge

    and Applicative Capacity

    Cronbachs 0.903 0.868 0.851

    The Skills

    of Employability

    Good workingattitude.

    Stability andresistance to stress.

    Teamwork abilities.

    Understand and

    abide by professionalethics and moral.

    Willingness to learnand plasticity.

    Career planningcapacity.

    Understanding of theindustry environment

    and development.Job search and self-marketing capability.

    Innovation capability.

    Leadership abilities.

    Presentation andcommunication ability.

    To explore and solve theproblem capacity.

    Professional knowledge andskills.

    Basic computer applicationskills.

    Foreign language ability.

    Able to theories applied topractice.

  • 7/27/2019 87521848

    8/15

    58 Lai and Tien-Liu

    4.2 The supply and demand of employability by the self -assessment ofuniversity graduates. They showed in Table 3 and Table 4

    Table 3.The supply of employability by self-assessment in higher education.

    Employability

    Work Attitude and

    Cooperative Ability

    (w; (1, 2, 3, 4, 5))

    Career Planning and

    Learning Enterprising

    Capacity

    (w; (1, 2, 3, 4, 5))

    Professional Knowledge

    and Applicative Capacity

    (w; (1, 2, 3, 4, 5))

    U, 1(X , Y), (.3; (.2, .1, .0, .0, .7)) (.5; (.3, .2, .1, .4, 0)) (.2; (0, 0, .2, .3, .5))

    U, 2 (X , Y), (.2; (.2, .2, .3, 0, .3)) (.3; (.1, 0, .3, .5, .1)) (.5; (0, .0, 0, .5, .5))

    U, 3 (X , Y), (.4; (.7, .1, .1, .1, 0)) (.1; (.2, .2, .2, .4, 0)) (.5; (.5, .3, .1, 0, .1))

    U, 30(X , Y), (.2; (0, 0, 0, .5, .5)) (.5; (0, 0, .8, .2, 0)) (0; (0, 0, 1, 0, 0))

    Fuzzy M ean (.4; (.3, .2, .1, .2, .2)) (.3;(.3, .2, .2, .2, .1)) (.3; (.3, .2, .1, .2, .2))

    Index Demand 0.566667 0.536667 0.540667

    Total Demand 0.549873

    Table 4.The demand of workplace employability by self-assessment.

    Employability

    Work Attitude andCooperative Ability

    (w; (1, 2, 3, 4, 5))

    Career Planningand Learning

    Enterprising Capacity

    (w; (1, 2, 3, 4, 5))

    Professional Knowledge andApplicative Capacity

    (w; (1, 2, 3, 4, 5))

    U, 1(X , Y), (.2; (.2, .5, 0, 0, .3)) (.2; (0, .2, .1, .4, .3)) (.6; (0, 0, .2, .3, .5))

    U, 2 (X , Y), (.6; (.2, 0, .3, 0, .5)) (.2; (.1, 0, .3, .5, .1)) (.2; (0, .0, 0, .5, .5))

    U, 3 (X , Y), (.3; (.7, .1, .1, .1, 0)) (.1; (.1, .1, .2, .4, .2)) (.6; (.1, .1, .1, 0, .7))

    U, 30(X , Y), (.4; (.2, .2, .1, .2, .3)) (.2; (.1, .2, .1, .2, .4)) (.4; (.2, .1, .2, .2, .3))

    Fuzzy Mean (.4; (.3, .2, .1, .2, .2)) (.2; (.1, .2, .1, .2, .4)) (.4; (.1, .1, .2, .2, .4))

    Index Demand 0.592667 0.718667 0.681333Total Demand 0.654951

  • 7/27/2019 87521848

    9/15

    59Evaluate the Employability of Higher Education by Fuzzy Data

    4.3 Summary

    4.3.1 Work attitude and cooperative ability

    1. Demand Supply = 2.963333 / 5 2.833333 / 5 = 0.130000 / 5 = 0.026000

    2. Rule 3: If 0 < Demand Supply 0.1, we will minutely reform the educational

    strategies of employability.

    3. Educative development in work attitude and cooperative ability, they will

    minutely reform the educational strategies of employability.

    4.3.2 Career planning and learning enterprising capacity

    1. Demand Supply = 3.593333 / 5 2.683333 / 5 = 0.910000 / 5 = 0.182000

    2. Rule 2: If 0.1 < Demand Supply 0.5, we will moderately reform the educational

    strategies of employability.

    3. Educative development in career planning and learning enterprising capacity,

    they will moderately reform the educational strategies of employability.

    4.3.3 Professional knowledge and applicative capacity

    1. Demand Supply = 3.406667 / 5 2.703333 / 5 = 0.703334 / 5 = 0.140667

    2. Rule 2: If 0.1 < Demand Supply 0.5, we will moderately reform the educational

    strategies of employability.

    3. Educative development in professional knowledge and applicative capacity,

    they will moderately reform the educational strategies of employability.

    4.3.4 Employability of higher education

    1. Demand Supply = 3.274756 / 5 2.749367 / 5 = 0.525389 / 5 = 0.105078

    2. Rule 2: If 0.1 < Demand Supply 0.5, we will moderately reform the educational

    strategies of employability.

    3. Educative development in the overall employability, they will moderately

    reform the educational strategies of employability.

    5. Conclusion

    Therefore, new model that showed in Figure 1 can apply to evaluate the demand

    and supply employability of one university by testing all departments. Advanced

    application to evaluate the demand and supply employability of higher education of

    the country by testing all universities.

  • 7/27/2019 87521848

    10/15

    60 Lai and Tien-Liu

    5.1 New model showed in Figure 1

    Figure 1.Evaluate the employability of higher education by fuzzy data.

    5.2 Superiority of the new mode in this study

    5.2.1 Closer to real than over-education assessment

    The over education assessment f ocused on the analysis of the supply and demand

    of the overall national higher. The results of assessment are excessive education or

    lack of education. But such analysis methods are too macroscopic. Failed to point out

    where there is the problem. Because of this, this type of evaluation and conclusions

    could not improve the ef ficiency of policy and implementation.

    5.2.2 More holistic connotation of the evaluation

    Visits members only independent alumni satisfaction survey at the evaluation

    of university or department. And they did not included in the evaluation project for

    the employment rate and the employability. Such practices lack an overall assess-ment. We must use the same respondents object to do the gap assessment of the edu-

    cation force and the market employability. And aptly ref lect the educational quality

    of the department. This mode provides the more in-depth and appropriate method in

    the university evaluation.

  • 7/27/2019 87521848

    11/15

    61Evaluate the Employability of Higher Education by Fuzzy Data

    5.2.3 Both macroscopic features of the assessment model of over-educationand microscopic f eatures of the assessment model of department

    employability

    This is an integrated assessment model. Base on the purposes that there are both

    macroscopic features of the assessment model of over-education and microscopic

    features of the assessment model of department employability. The new mode had

    both the microscopic and macroscopic features. It is the ssuperiority of the new mode

    in this study. But how to apply the new mode? Let us introduce in the following.

    1. How to apply the new mode in the evaluation of a university?

    First for the department graduates to test the supply of employability by self-assessment. At the same time, to test the demand of workplace employability by self-

    assessment. Using the methods of expert decision-making system (rule-base system)

    to give the overall level of performance of the department employability had micro-

    scopic features. The type of using the same method to all departments had macro-

    scopic features.

    2. How to apply the new mode in the evaluation of higher education of a country?

    First for all university graduates in one university to test the supply of employ-

    ability by self-assessment. At the same time, to test the demand of workplace em-

    ployability by self-assessment. Using the methods of expert decision-making system

    (rule-base system) to give the overall level of performance of the university employ-

    ability had microscopic features. And the type of using the same method to all uni-

    versities had macroscopic features. It can apply in the quality evaluation of senior

    high school and the teacher evaluation of junior high school.

    5.2.4 With high quality features

    The type of questionnaire in this new model designed by fuzzy two-dimensional

    questionnaire. Subjects must answer both fuzzy weight and fuzzy membership.

    Because fuzzy statistic method is more robust than traditional statistic method.

    Therefore, we can get the more real and more robustic results by the new model of

    this study.

    5.2.5 The new model is suitable for the assessment of the employability in

    Taiwan

    The employability index of cited from the National Youth Commission, Executive

    Yuan in 2006. Therefore, this new model is very appropriate to evaluate the local

    employability of higher education.

  • 7/27/2019 87521848

    12/15

    62 Lai and Tien-Liu

    Reference

    [1] A. Alba-Ramrez (1993). Mismatch in the Spanish labor market: Overeducation?

    Journal of Human Resources, 28, 259-278.

    [2] T. Bauer (2002). Educational mismatch and wages: A panel analysis, Economics

    of Education Review, 21, 221-229.

    [3] F. Bchel and M. van Ham (2003). Over education, regional labor markets and

    spatial flexibility, Journal of Urban Economics, 53, 482-493.

    [4] V. Burris (1983). The social and political consequence of over education,

    American Sociological Review, 48, 454-469.

    [5] D. Carrolla and M. Tani (2012). Over-education of recent higher education

    graduates: New Australian panel evidence, Economics of Education Review, 32,

    207-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.10.002.

    [6] A. Chevalier (2003). Measuring over education, Economical, 70, 509-531.

    [7] CLIPS (1998). CLI PS Ref erence Manual Volume I Basic Programming Guide,

    Version 6.10, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX.

    [8] R. Decker, A. de Grip and H. Heijke (2002). The ef fects of training and over

    education on career mobility in a segmented labor market, International

    Journal of Manpower, 23(2), 106-125.

    [9] P. Dolton and A. Vignoles (2000). The incidence and effects of over education in

    the UK graduate Labor market, Economics of Education Review, 19, 179-198.

    [10] G. J. Duncan and S. Hof fman (1981). The incidence and wage ef fects of

    overedcuation, Economics of Education Review, 1, 75-86.

    [11] W. Groot (1996). The incidence and returns to over education in the UK,

    Applied Economics, 28, 1345-1350.

    [12] W. Groot and H. Maassen van den Brink (2000). Over education in the labor

    market: A meta-analysis, Economics of Education Review, 19, 149-158.

    [13] A. Gupta, C. Forgy, A. Newell and R. Wedig (1986). Paral lel algorithms

    and architectures for rule-based systems, Proceedin gs of the 13th Annual

    International Symposium on Computer Architecture, Tokyo, Japan. Available

    online at http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=17356.17360.

    [14] J. Hartog and H. Oosterbeek (1988). Education, allocation and earnings in the

    Netherlands: Over schooling? Economics of Education Review, 7(2), 185-194.

  • 7/27/2019 87521848

    13/15

    63Evaluate the Employability of Higher Education by Fuzzy Data

    [15] J. Hersch (1995). Optimal mismatch and promotions, Economic Enquiry, 33, 611-624.

    [16] I. P. Jocelyn (1996). What is a rule-based system?Available online at http://www.

    jpaine.org/students/lectures/lect3/node5.html

    [17] B. Kiker, M. Santos and M. Mendes de Oliveiria (1997). Over education and

    undereducation: Evidence for Portuga, Economics of Education Review, 16(2),

    111-125.

    [18] S. Lee and R. M. OKeefe (1996). The ef fect of knowledge representation

    scheme on maintainability of knowledge-based systems, IEEE Transactions on

    Knowledge and Data Engineering, 8(1), 173-178.

    [19] Y.-L. Lee, B. Sun and D.-F. Chang (2012). Fuzzy decision system f or course

    demand-supply management in community college, The International

    Symposium on Innovative Management, Information & Production, University

    of Social Sciences and Humanities, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.

    [20] K. McGoldrick and J. Robst (1996). Gender differences in over education: A test

    of the theory of differential over qualification, American Economic Review, 86,

    280-284.

    [21] S. McGuinness (2003a). Graduate over education as a sheepskin ef fect: Evidence

    from Northern Ireland,Applied Economics, 35, 597-608.

    [22] S. McGuinness (2003b). University quality and labor market outcomes,Applied

    Economics, 35, 1943-1955.

    [23] Ministry of Education. (2012). Education Statistical Indicators, Authior, Taipei.

    [24] National Youth Commission, Executive Yuan. (2006). Manpower Survey Report

    of Employment o f College Graduates, National Youth Commission College

    Graduate Employment Manpower Survey Group, Taipei.

    [25] H. Patrinos (1997). Over education in Greece, International Review of Education,

    43, 203-223.

    [26] H. Reichgelt (1991). Knowled ge re presentation: An AI Perspective, Ablex,

    Norwood, NJ.

    [27] R. Rumberger (1987). The impact of surplus education on productivity and

    earnings, Journal of Human Resources, 22(1), 24-50.

    [28] P. Sloane, H. Battu and P. Seaman (1999). Over education, under education and

    the British labor market, Applied Economics, 31, 1437-1453.

  • 7/27/2019 87521848

    14/15

    64 Lai and Tien-Liu

    [29] N. Sicherman (1991). Over education in the labor market, Journal of LaborEconomics, 9(2), 101-122.

    [30] L. C. Thurow (1975). Generating Inequality, Basic Books, New York.

    [31] R. Verdugo and N. Verdugo (1989). The impact of surplus schooling on earning.

    Some additional findings, Journal of Human Resources, 24, 629-643.

    [32] B. Wu (2001). Detection of change points in time series analysis with fuzzy

    statistics, International Journal of Systems Science, 32, 1185-1192.

    [33] B. Wu and M. F. Liu (2012). All work and no play makes Jack a dull leader?

    Impact evaluation with leisure activities and management performance forthe school leaders, The International Symposium on Innovative M anagement,

    Inf ormation & Production, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Ho

    Chi Minh, Vietnam.

    [34] L. Xiao (2003). The models of mismatch between education and occupation,

    Educational Policy Forum, 6(2), 43-67.

    [35] C.-J. Yang(2010). A study of over-education of college recent graduates in

    Taiwan, Masters thesis, Institute of Agricultural Economics, National Taiwan

    University, Taipei.

    .

  • 7/27/2019 87521848

    15/15

    Copyright of International Journal of Intelligent Technologies & Applied Statistics is the property of Airiti

    Press Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the

    copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for

    individual use.