7/15/20151 business strategy & policy psu mgmt #562 dave garten [email protected] week #...

17
06/23/22 1 Business Strategy & Policy PSU MGMT #562 Dave Garten [email protected] Week # 4 –Biz Strategies

Post on 22-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 7/15/20151 Business Strategy & Policy PSU MGMT #562 Dave Garten daveoutside@alum.mit.edu Week # 4 –Biz Strategies

04/19/23 1

Business Strategy & Policy PSU MGMT #562

Dave [email protected]

Week # 4 –Biz Strategies

Page 2: 7/15/20151 Business Strategy & Policy PSU MGMT #562 Dave Garten daveoutside@alum.mit.edu Week # 4 –Biz Strategies

04/19/23 Dave Garten - Business Strategy 2

Yet…

InsideOutside

3-5 years out

Building a collective view of

the future…

What new core competencies do we need to build?

What new product concepts should we pioneer?

What alliances do we need to form?

What l/t regulatory initiatives do we need to form?

Source: Derived from Competing for the Future by Gary Hamel and C.K. Prahalad

Page 3: 7/15/20151 Business Strategy & Policy PSU MGMT #562 Dave Garten daveoutside@alum.mit.edu Week # 4 –Biz Strategies

04/19/23 Dave Garten - Business Strategy 3

Differentiation

“increase in perceived value relative to the perceived value of other firms” - Barney

“If you can’t differentiate yourself in this world, you get commoditized instantaneously. So we are constantly driving for more innovation, more differentiation and more technology.”- Jeffrey R. Immelt, Chairman and CEO, GE

Page 4: 7/15/20151 Business Strategy & Policy PSU MGMT #562 Dave Garten daveoutside@alum.mit.edu Week # 4 –Biz Strategies

04/19/23 Dave Garten - Business Strategy 4

DifferentiationWhy differentiate?

Ways to differentiate

X

Page 5: 7/15/20151 Business Strategy & Policy PSU MGMT #562 Dave Garten daveoutside@alum.mit.edu Week # 4 –Biz Strategies

04/19/23 Dave Garten - Business Strategy 5

Differential (Segmentation)

Segment via benefits, demographics and psychographics

Segmentation is basis for differentiation Determines the value proposition

Page 6: 7/15/20151 Business Strategy & Policy PSU MGMT #562 Dave Garten daveoutside@alum.mit.edu Week # 4 –Biz Strategies

The Basis for Segmentation

Opportunities forDifferentiation

Characteristics of the Buyers

Characteristics of the Product

Industrial buyers

Household buyers

Distribution channel

Geographicallocation

*Size*Technical sophistication*OEM/replacement

*Demographics*Lifestyle*Purchase occasion

*Size*Distributor/broker*Exclusive/ nonexclusive*General/special list

*Physical size *Price level*Product features *Technology design*Inputs used (e.g. raw materials)*Performance characteristics*Pre-sales & post-sales services

Source: Jim Goes

Page 7: 7/15/20151 Business Strategy & Policy PSU MGMT #562 Dave Garten daveoutside@alum.mit.edu Week # 4 –Biz Strategies

04/19/23 Dave Garten - Business Strategy 7

Differentiation - observations

5 forces: differentiation lowers threat of rivalry & substitutes (barriers to entry)VRIO tests differentiation: rare & imitable?Differentiation narrows with life cycleBrand can limit differentiation Patents can enhance differentiationOrganization is a source of differentiation Creativity, risk-taking, complexity, cross group

(link to core competency)

Page 8: 7/15/20151 Business Strategy & Policy PSU MGMT #562 Dave Garten daveoutside@alum.mit.edu Week # 4 –Biz Strategies

Segmentation - U.S. Bicycle IndustrySEGMENT

Low price bicycles sold primarily through department and discount stores, mainly under the retailer’sown brand (e.g. Sears’ “Free Spirit”);

KEY SUCCESS FACTORS

* Low-costs through global sourcing of components & low-wage assembly.* Supply contract with major retailer.

Leading competitors: Taiwanese & Chinese assemblers,some U.S manufacturers, e.g. Murray Ohio, Huffy

Medium-priced bicycles sold primarily under manufacturer’s brandname and distributed mainly throughspecialist bicycles stores;

*Cost efficiency through large scale operation and either low wages or automated manufacturing.*Reputation for quality (durability, reliability) through effective marketing to dealers and/or consumers.* International marketing & distribution.

Leading competitors: Raleigh, Giant, Peugeot, Fuji (Japan).

*Quality of components and assembly, Innovation in design (e.g. minimizing weight and wind resistance).*Reputation (e.g. through success in racing, through effective brand management).*Strong dealer relations.Leading competitors: K2, Specialized, Trek

Similar to low-price bicycle segment.

High-priced bicycles for enthusiasts.

Children’s bicycles (and tricycles) soldprimarily through toy retailers (discount toy stores, department stores, and specialist toy stores).

Source: Jim Goes

Page 9: 7/15/20151 Business Strategy & Policy PSU MGMT #562 Dave Garten daveoutside@alum.mit.edu Week # 4 –Biz Strategies

04/19/23 Dave Garten - Business Strategy 9

Cost Leadership

Manufacturing businesses Conventional: High MSS -> High accumulated

volume low unit cost -> high profitability Experience curve (learning), know-how, IP,

specialization, improvements

Service businesses Know-how; experience curve applies

Diseconomies sometimesCost structure Labor, capital, land, raw materials, geography,

use of technology, government policySource: Derived from Barney, Gaining & Sustaining Competitive Advantage

Page 10: 7/15/20151 Business Strategy & Policy PSU MGMT #562 Dave Garten daveoutside@alum.mit.edu Week # 4 –Biz Strategies

Drivers of Cost Advantage

• Organizational slack

• Ratio of fixed to variable costs• Costs of installing and closing capacity

• Location advantages• Ownership of low-cost inputs • Bargaining power• Supplier cooperation

• Design for automation• Designs to economize on materials

• Mechanization and automation• Efficient utilization of materials• Increased precision

• Increased dexterity• Improved coordination/ organization

• Indivisibilities• Specialization and division of labor

PRODUCTION TECHNIQUES

PRODUCT DESIGN

INPUT COSTS

CAPACITY UTILIZATION

MANAGERIAL/ ORGANIZATIONALEFFICIENCY

ECONOMIES OF LEARNING

ECONOMIES OF SCALE

Page 11: 7/15/20151 Business Strategy & Policy PSU MGMT #562 Dave Garten daveoutside@alum.mit.edu Week # 4 –Biz Strategies

04/19/23 Dave Garten - Business Strategy 11

Cost Leadership Observations

5 Forces: Entrants often try differentiation to attack Threat of substitution check & balance Scale -> more power relative to

suppliers/customers

VRIO test rarity & imitability Social complexity (learning curve), access to

low cost factors, “software”

Price-cost decoupling TTM, penetration and defensive strategies

Pure play cost leadership Generally not…“Lean and mean”

Page 12: 7/15/20151 Business Strategy & Policy PSU MGMT #562 Dave Garten daveoutside@alum.mit.edu Week # 4 –Biz Strategies

04/19/23 Dave Garten - Business Strategy 12

Airline Cost/Differentiation

Page 13: 7/15/20151 Business Strategy & Policy PSU MGMT #562 Dave Garten daveoutside@alum.mit.edu Week # 4 –Biz Strategies

04/19/23 Dave Garten - Business Strategy 13

Low Cost Entry

Source: Strategies to Fight Low Cost Rivals, by Nurmalya Kumar, HBR, 2006 (#R0126F)

Page 14: 7/15/20151 Business Strategy & Policy PSU MGMT #562 Dave Garten daveoutside@alum.mit.edu Week # 4 –Biz Strategies

04/19/23 Dave Garten - Business Strategy 14

Vertical IntegrationDegree of control over the value chainForward -> toward customerBackward -> toward R&DDriven by relationship, threat of opportunism, specificity, uncertainty

R&D Manufacturing Sales & marketing Distribution Service

Page 15: 7/15/20151 Business Strategy & Policy PSU MGMT #562 Dave Garten daveoutside@alum.mit.edu Week # 4 –Biz Strategies

04/19/23 Dave Garten - Business Strategy 15

Vertical IntegrationMarket

GovernanceVertical

IntegrationAlliances

Control (opportunism)

Flexibility (uncertainty)

Plus of vertical integration

Minus of vertical integration

X

Page 16: 7/15/20151 Business Strategy & Policy PSU MGMT #562 Dave Garten daveoutside@alum.mit.edu Week # 4 –Biz Strategies

04/19/23 Dave Garten - Business Strategy 16

Time to MarketLearning curve advantagesFirst use stickiness Brand, differentiation, reputation Creation of “standard,” expectations

Networking effect Interoperability, Value = f(n**2)

“Arrows in the back” Incumbent, imitation, mistake

WindowsAlways learn and adjust

Page 17: 7/15/20151 Business Strategy & Policy PSU MGMT #562 Dave Garten daveoutside@alum.mit.edu Week # 4 –Biz Strategies

04/19/23 Dave Garten - Business Strategy 17

Mondavi Case

Objective: Evaluation of business strategies used in the wine industryLearnings:

Industries exhibit different structures across geographies.

Use of different strategies is used within an industry to gain competitive advantage.

Consolidation as a strategy is most often driven by economies of scope/scale, but other considerations become factors.