7. geomorphology of the himalaya
TRANSCRIPT
GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE HIMALAYA: A CLIMATO-
TECTONIC FRAMEWORK
Landscapes are shaped by tectonic movements and sculptured by
denudation processes
In mountain areas, regional variation in geomorphology,
topography and erosional processes reflect the spatial variation in
geology and the rate of uplift, and denudation
In part, geology may mirror the variation in uplift and denudation
Variation in uplift is controlled by the plate tectonic setting and
denudation is usually affected by precipitation-driven
processes, is controlled by global atmospheric circulation pattern
with the mountains
The regional geomorphology of the Himalaya reflects the
interaction of mountain building and precipitation variation
The N-S and E-W variation of Himalayan geomorphology is a
function of the climate, tectonics, geology, topography, erosional
processes, sediment yield etc.
Topography: Parallel to
strike, four physiographic
division
1. Low/Fore/Outer or
Sub-Himalaya. Average
height: 900-1500m and
10-13 km wide
2. Middle: North of the Outer Himalaya, average height: 700-2500
m, average width: 60-130 km. In central Nepal, it can be divided
into highly dissected Mahabharat Range (north of MBF)
3. The Higher/Greater: Average height: 50-100 km, average
elevation: 6000m and numerous peaks rising to 8000 m. This unit
asymmetrically rises sharply from the south and gradually merges
with the Tebetian plateau to the north.
4. To the north of the highest mountain. Within this unit, the
Tibetan marginal range forms a 6000-7000m high southern
rampart to the Tibetan plateau to the north
PLATE TECTONIC SETTING
The Himalaya is the product of the Indian-Eurasia collision that
started t 50My ago.
But the present mountain building is much younger as the
Himalaya did not significantly block moisture from the south until
Mid Pleistocene
The Himalaya shows longitudinal and transverse seismic
inhomogenity which is well reflected from the southward- different
rate of thrust sheet movement and distribution of earthquake
epicentres (Bilham, 2004)
The longitudinal and transverse dissection of the Himalaya shows
distinct geomorphological characteristics
CENTRAL SEISMIC GAP
The central seismic gap (Bilham et al., 2001, Seeber and
Armbruster, 1981) lies in between the 1905 Kangra Eq. in the
west and the 1934 Bihar-Nepal Eq. in the east within which
earthquake >8M has not been reported within last 300 years
Three prominent seismic
gaps have been identified in
the Himalayan terrain based
on the historical great
earthquake (M>8) record
The conditional probability of occurring great Eqs in western
Himalaya in time window 100 years is 27% in Kashmir gap, 6% in
Kangra region, 52% in Central seismic gap and 3% in Bihar-
Nepal region (Khatri, 1999)
PRECIPITATION
The interaction of the southwestern monsoon with the Himalaya is
the major influence on the climate of the areaThin black arrows indicate present-day, weak monsoonal wind directions. Bold orange arrows show prevailing wind directions of strong monsoon inferred to represent intensified monsoon phases (IMP) during late Pleistocene and Holocene. Dashed lines depict temporal evolution of Indian summer monsoon and its northwestward propagation
From June to September, the Himalaya force the prevailing winds
to rise, and most precipitation occurs on the southern flank of the
range, in the Low and Middle Himalaya.
In general the Siwalik range does not obstruct the monsoon and
maximum precipitation occurs on the southern flanks of Pir Panjal,
Middle Himalaya and Mahabharat ranges
Rainfall decreases northward of the Middle Himalaya
But again it increases on coming within about 40 km of the crest
of the Greater Himalaya, with annual rainfall of 2500-3500mm .
About 20-30 km south of the crest of the Himalaya rainfall drops
sharply to < 1000mm-~600 mm.
On the northern slope of the Great Himalaya, rain shadow is
pronounced
Over most of the Himalaya (including the rain shadow area) ~90%
rainfall occurs during the summer monsoon.
At high elevations in the Greater
Himalaya, most snow falls
during the monsoon or late
winter.
The uplift rates
across the different
segments of the
Himalaya is poorlydefined
UPLIFT RATES
The Himalaya shows along
and across variation of uplift
rated due to the segmented
nature
A proportional measure
of uplift rates across the
Himalaya can be inferred
from the river terraces
The profile of the highest
terrace suggests that
uplift rates are highest in
the low and high
Himalayas.
EROSION PROCESS
Mass wasting is the dominant process in the Himalayas: Due to
tectonism, freezing and thawing, gravity, pore fluid pressure
Geomorphic mapping in the Middle
Himalayas indicate over 75% of landscape
is undergoing moderate to rapid or
extremely rapid mass wasting
Shallow landslides are by far the most
numerous and most failure occurs in the
monsoon
Geological factors such as faulting, shearing, weathering and
weak lithology appear the most important determinants of slopestability
Ramsay (1978) studied the erosion processes and mass wasting
in parts of the Middle Himalaya (Phewa valley in 122 km2) and
found that there is average 2-3 mm surface lowering annually in
the area
Another recent study by Caine and Mool (1982) suggest
~12mm/yr lowering of the area though landslide presently
occupying only 1% of the area.
Many Himalayan landscapes
appear to undergo cyclic
behavior with periods of
relative stability separated by
spells of instability during
which large number of
landslides occur.
Most mass flow materials are transported out of the Himalaya by
streams and form alluvial fans at the foot hill
Observation by Starkel (1972) of landslide following a heavy rain
in the Darjeeling area suggest that such catastrophic events
should be considered the most significant for slope evolution in
parts of the Himalaya.
Such single events may
result in annual erosion of ten
times more than average
Fluvial erosion rates in the Himalaya is poorly documented
although Ciene and Mool (1981) indicate a maximum probable
rate of bank erosion of few rivers and tributaries are 12mm/yr.
With increasing altitude, glacial and periglacial processes increase
in importance. Glacial processes are common on the highest
ranges.
SEDIMENT YIELDS
Different authors estimated sediment yield for same drainage
basin, but all the data are inaccurate, imprecise and misses the
peak yield
Though the data quality is poor, still it suggests some regional
variation as it appears that, the sediment yield is the highest in the
Low and Middle Himalaya in contrast with the high Himalaya or
Tibetian plateau
Sediment yield appear greatest
from areas with highest rainfall
Most sediments likely to be
produced from only a small part
of the basin (The zones where
mass movement debouches
into the fluvial system).
CONCLUSION
Regionally, the Geomorphology of the Himalaya reflects variations
in uplift and erosion rates, and their differences
Uplift is rapid and presently appears to be greatest in the Low
and Higher Himalaya in the vicinity of MBT and MCT.
This uplift has forced a topographic barrier into the monsoon
circulation, so controlling the precipitation pattern, and in turn , as
precipitation is a primarily the driving force for erosion, controlling
the variation of the denudation rates.
Precipitation is high in the Lesser Himalaya and so as the erosion
rate. But the rate of uplift compensate the denudation
Glacial landforms occur at higher elevations but at lower
elevations V-shaped valleys occur with alluvial, fluvio-glacial,
glacial and landslide deposits on the valley floors
Depositional landforms are more common than in the Lesser
Himalaya.
T
H
A
N
K
Y
O
U