7. - shodhgangashodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/1008/14/14_chapter 7.pdfburton, g.w. 1952....
TRANSCRIPT
-
7. REFERENCES
Abdullaev, I.K. 1962. Utilization of triploidy in the development of high yielding
forms of mulberry for the silkworm. Agrobiology 61-65 (Russian), Plant
Breed. Abstr., 3630:459.
Aleksandrov, A.1988. The rooting ability of some promising cultivars of mulberry
(Genus Morus L.,). Rasteniev-D. Nauki, 25(3):67-73.
Alrneida, J.E., Soares, A.R. Ramalho, M.A.P. and Fonseca, T.C. 1991.
Phenotypical stability in the mulberry. Sericologia 31(30):475-478.
Amirthadevarathinam, A., Sankarapandian, P. and Natarajan, M. 1990.
Phenotypic stability for grain yield in certain breeding lines and varieties of
grain cum fodder sorghum. Madras Agric. J., 77(9-12): 368-371.
Anido, F.L., Cravero, V., Asprelli, P., Firpo, T., Garcia, S.M. and Cointry, E. 2004.
Heterotic patterns in hybrids involving cultivar-groups of summer squash,
Cucurbita pep0 L. Euphytica 135 (3):355-360.
Arunachalam, V. 1989. Genetic bases of plant breeding. In: Plant Breeding -
Theory and Practice. V.L.Chopra (Ed). Oxford and IBH Publishing Co Ltd.,
New Delhi.
-
Badalov, N.G. 1971. Result of testing the triploid mulberry variety Khanalar - Tut.
for silkworm feeding spring, summer and autumn. Plant Breed. Abstr.,
42(4): 1038.
Baksh, S., Kaul, S., Kumar, M., Singh, Y., Raj, S. Mukherjee, P. 1992. Screening
of mulberry genotypes for higher rooting. National Conference on mulberry
sericulture research, CSR&TI, Mysore, 10-1 1 December, 4992, pp.1.
Bari, M.A., Qaiyyum M.A., Islam, M and Ahmed, S.U. 1988a. Comparative
evaluation of morphological characters of some open pollinated progenies
and parental lines of mulberry. Sericologia 28(4):509-516.
Bari, M.A., Qaiyyum M.A., Islam, M and Ahmed, S.U. 1988b. Estimates of genetic
variability for some quantitative characters in mulberry. International
congress on Tropical sericultural practices (Bangalore), Feb 18-23, 1988.
Bari, M.A., Qaiyyum, M.A. and Ahmed, S.U. 1989. Correlation studies in mulberry
(Morus alba L., ). Indian J. Seric., 28:11-17.
Bari, M.A., Qaiyyum, M. and Ahmed, Su, 1990. Stability of leaf yield in some
selected genotypes of mulberry (Morus alba L.). Indian J . Seric. 29:88-92.
-
Becker, H.C. 1981. Correlations among some statistical measures of phenotypic
stability. Euphytica 30:835-840.
Benchamin, K.V. 1989. Bioassay techniques for evaluation of mulberry leaf
quality. In: Genetic Resources of mulberry and its utilization, CSR&TI,
Mysore, pp. 159-1 74.
Bhat, G. and Hittalmani, S. 1992. Clonal difference in mulberry (Morus spp.) for
root growth parameters. lndian J. Seric. 31(1):5-8.
Bindroo, B.B., Fotadar, R.K. and Anil Dhar. 1996. Propagation of mulberry under
sub-tropical conditions. lndian Silk 34(9):11-15.
Bindroo, B.B., Tiku, A.K. and Javid, G.N. 1983. Studies on the propagation of
mulberry under temperate climatic conditions - Part I - Propagation through
hard wood cuttings. National Seminar on Silk Research and Development,
Bangalore, India, p. 108.
Bindroo, B.B., Tiku, A.K. and Pandit, R.K. 1990. Variation of some metric traits in
mulberry varieties. lndian For., 116(4):320-324.
Birari, D.S., Birari, S.P. and Jamadagni, B.M. 1993. Stability analysis of promising
genotypes of cow pea. lndian J. Agric. Sci., 63(2):103-106.
-
Bongale, U.D. (2000). Productivity alleviation in mulberry cultivation - An
appraisal. National Conference on Strategies for Sericulture Research and
Development, Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Mysore,
pp 34-37.
Bongale, U.D. and Chaluvachari (1993). Evaluation of four mulberry varieties by
leaf biochemical analysis and bioassay with Bombyx mori L. J. Indian Bot.
SOC., 72: 59-62.
Breese, B.L. 1969. The measurement and significance of genotype-environment
interaction in grasses. Heredity 24:27-44.
Bucio-Alanis,L. 1966. Environmental and genotype - environmental components
of variability. II.Heterozygotes. Heredity 21:399-405.
Bucio-Alanis,L. and Will, J. 1966. Enivironmental and genotype-environmental
components of variability. II. Heterozygotes. Heredity 21:399-405.
Bucio-Alanis, L., Perkins, J.M. and Jinks, J.L. 1969. Environmental and genotype
environmental components of variability. V. Segregating generations.
Heredity 24:115-127.
-
Burton, G.W. 1952. Quantitative inheritance in grasses. Proc. 6th Int. Grass land
Cong., 1 : 227-283.
Cafarov, N.A. and Abbasov, A.A. 1977. The effect of ploidy and other factors on
the increase in rooting ability of mulberry cuttings. Azerb elmitadgigat
impakcillinst asarlar termat macmrsac, 9:lO-15.
Ceccarelli, S. 1994. Specific adaptation and breeding for marginal conditions.
Euphytica 77:205-219.
Chaitanya, K.V., Masilamani, S. and Reddy, A.R. 2002. Photosynthetic rates and
biomass productivity in four mulberry cultivars. 2nd International Congress of
Plant Physiology, New Delhi, 8-12 January.
Chaluvachari and Bongale, U.D. 1994. Evaluation of leaf quality of some
germplasm genotypes of mulberry through chemical analysis and bioassay
with silkworm, Bombyx mori L. lndian J. Seric., 34:127-132.
Chauhan, S.K. and Kulshrestha, A.K. 2003. Women uplift mulberry sericulture
enterprise. lndian Farming 52(11):21-22.
Chaturvedi, H.K. and Sarkar, A. 2000. Optimum size and shape of the plot for
mulberry experiments. lndian J. Seric. 39(1):66-69.
-
Choudhusy, P.C., Shukla, P., Ghosh, A., Mallikarjuna, B. and Sengupta, K. 1991.
Effect of spacing, crown height and method of pruning on mulberry leaf yield,
quality and cocoon yield. Indian J. Seric., 30(1): 46-53.
Clarke, J.M. and Mccaig, T.N. 1982. Evaluation of techniques for screening for
drought resistance in wheat. Crop Sci., 22:503-506.
Coffman, W.R. and Smith, M.E. 1991. Role of public, industry and International
research centre breeding programmes in developing germplasm for
sustainable agriculture. In: D.A.Sleeper, T.C.Barkar and P.J.Bramal-Cox
(&.). Plant breeding and sustainable agriculture, Consideration for
objectives and methods, pp.1-9, CSSA Special publication no.18.
Comstock, R.E, and Moll, R.H. 1963. Genotype x environment interactions.
Symposium on statistical genetics and plant breeding. NAS-NRC Publ. 1982.
Cooper, M., Stucker, R.E., DeLacy, I.H. and Harch, B.D. Wheat breeding
nurseries, target environments, and indirect selection for grain yield. Crop
Sci. 37:1168-1176.
Dandin, S.B. 1989. Role of mulberry varieties in sericulture industry. Indian Silk
28(6): 11-1 9.
-
Dandin, S.B. and Jolly, M.S. 1986. Mulberry descriptor. Sericologia 26:(465-475).
Dandin, S.B. and Kumar, R. (1989). Evaluation of mulberry genotypes for different
growth and yield parameters. In: Genetic Resources of Mulberry and its
Utilisation. Published by CSR&TI, Mysore, pp. 143-1 51.
Dandin S.B., Jolly, M.S. , Susheelamma, B.N., Mallikarjunappa, R.S. and Sastry,
C.R. 1983. Evaluation and utilization of existing genetic variability in
mulberry. National Seminar on Silk Research and Development, Bangalore,
March 10-13,p.2.
Dandin, S.B., Venugopalapillai, S. and Sengupta, K. 1988. Guidelines for raising
mulberry saplings on commercial scale. Published by Central Sericultural
Research and Training Institute, Mysore, pp 1-12.
Das, B.C. and Krishnaswamy, S. (1969). Estimation of components of variations of
leaf yield and its traits in mulberry. J. Seric. Sci. Japan., 38:242-248.
Das, B.C. and Prasad, D.N. 1974. Evaluation of some tetraploid and triploid
mulberry varieties through chemical analysis and feeding experiments. Indian
J. Seric., 13:17-22.
-
Das, C., Misra, A.K., Sengupta, T. and Das, B.K. 2003. C-1730 mulberry suits to
chronic drought prone red laterite soild of West Bengal. Indian Farming
52(10): 12-14.
Das, S.Y. and Chakraborty, S. 1998. Genetic variation for seed yield and its
components in green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Advances in Plant
Science 11(1):271-273.
Datta, R.K. 1998. Utilisation of mulberry and silkworm germplasm and importance
of data base management. National seminar on mulberry and silkworm
germplasm, Central Sericultural Germplasm Resources Centre, Hosur, ppl.
Dewey, O.R. and Lu, K.H. 1959. A correlation and path coefficient analysis of
components of crested wheat grass seed production. J. Agron., 57515-518.
Dickerson, G.E.1955. Genetic slippage in response to selection for multiple
objectives. Cold Spring Harbour Symposia on Quantitative Biology 20213-
Dwivedi, N.K., Suryanarayana, N., Sikdar, A.K., Susheelamma, B.N. and Jolly,
M.S. 1989. Cytomorphological studies in triploid mulberry evolved by
hybridization of female gamete cells. Cytologia 54(1):13-19.
-
Dzhafarov, N.A. and Abbasov, S.N. 1967. The hybridization of mulberry forms and
the study of their progeny. Trans. Az. Seri. Res. Inst. Silk Prod., pp. 67-84.
Dzhafarov, N.A. and Abbasov, S.N. 1970. Hybridization of polypioids and its
importance in seed production in mulberry. In: Polyploidya U Shelkovitry,
MOSCOW, pp.168-173.
Eberhart, S.A. and Russell, W.A. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing
varieties. Crop Sci., 6:36-40.
Finlay, K.W. and Wilkinson, G.N. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant
breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14:742-754.
Fisher, R.A. and Yates, F. 1967. Statistical tables for biological, agricultural and
medical research. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburg.
Fotadar,R.K.1989. Use of hormones in mulberry propagation. Indian Silk 28:17-28.
Fotadar, R.K. 2002. Correlation and path analysis in mulberry. In: Advances in
Indian Sericulture Research. Published by Central Sericultural Research and
Training Institute, Mysore, pp 11-13.
-
Francis, T.R. and Kannenberg, L.W. 1978. Yield stability studies in short-season
maize. 1. A descriptive method for grouping genotpes. Can. J. Plant Sci.,
58:1029-1034.
Frey, K.J. 1964. Adaptation reaction of strains selected under stress and non-
stress environmental conditions. Crop Sci., 4:55-58.
Gabriel, K.R. 1971. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to
principal component analysis. Biometrika 58:453-467.
Gauch, H.G. and Zobel, R.W. 1996. AMMl analysis of yield trials p.1-40. In
M.S.Kang and H.G.Gauch (ed.) Genotype-by-environment interaction. CRC
Press. Boca Raton, FL.
Gauch, H.G. and Zobel, R.W. 1997. Identifying mega-environments and targeting
genotypes. Crop Sci. 37:311-326.
Goel, A.K., Ravindran, S., Anandarao, A., Girish Naik, V., Tikader, A., Mukherjee,
P. Sekar, S. 1998. Variability in rooting parameters at juvenile stage in
mulberry (Morus spp.) germplasm. Indian J. Seric. 37(2):109-112.
Hamada, S. 1959. Principles in high yielding in mulberry culture. J. Silkworm T-
11.8:125-132.
-
Hanson, C.H., Robinson, H.F. and Comstock, R.E. 1956. Biometrical studies of
yield in segregating population of Korean laspedaza. Agron. J., 48:262-272.
Hartman, H.T. and Kester, D.E. 1978. Plant propagation - Principles and
Practices. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, pp.662.
Henry, A. and Daulay, H.S. 1990. Phenotypic stability for seed yield in safflower
(Carthamus tinctorius L.). Madras Agric. J., 77 (9-1 2):47 1-473.
Honda, T. 1970. Studies on propagation of mulberry trees by cuttings. Bull. Seric.
Exp. Stn., 24(1): 231-236.
Honda, T. 1972. Technical problems on mulberry cuttings in Japan. JARQ,
6(4):235-239.
Ito, T. 1963. Nutrition of silkworm. Indian J. Seric., 1:15-17.
Jatindranath Swain (2001). Status paper of sericulture in Tamil Nadu. National
Seminar on Mulberry Sericulture Research in India. Karnataka State
Sericulture Research and Development Institute, Bangalore, pp 21-23.
-
Jinks, J.L. and Stevens, J.M. 1959. The components of variation among family
means in different crosses. Genetics 44:297-308.
Johnson, H.W., Robinson, H.F. and Cornstock, R.F. (4955). Estimates of genetic
and environmental variability in soyabean. Agron. J., 47:314-318.
Johnson, H.W., Robinson, H.F. and Cornstock, R.F. (1955a). Genotypic and
phenotypic correlations in soybean and their implications in selection. Agron.
J., 47:477-483.
Jolly, M.S. and Dandin, S.B. 1986. Collection, conservation and evaluation of
mulberry (Morus spp.) germplasm. Central Sericultural Research and
Training Institute, Mysore, India. pp. 1-10.
Joshi, A and Kohli, U.K. 2003. Genetic divergence for quantitative and qualitative
traits in tomato (Hycopersicon esculentum). Indian J . Agric. Sci., 73(2):110-
113.
Kamble, C.K. 1988. Multilocatinal trials of new mulberry varieties at Government
farms. Indian Silk 27(1):42-45.
Kang, M.S.1990. Genotype-by-environment interaction and plant breeding. Dept
of Agronomy, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouga, LA.
-
Kang, M.S. and Gauch, H.G. 1996. Genotype-by-environment interaction. CRC
Press, Boca Raton, FL.)
Kang, M.S. and Miller, J.D. 1984. Genotype x environment interactions for cane
and sugar yield and their implications in sugarcane breeding. Crop Sci.
241435-440.
Kang, M.S., Miller, J.D. and Darrah, L.L. 1987. A note on relationship between
stability variance and ecovalence. Journal of Heredity 78:107.
Kasiviswanathan, K., Krishnaswami, S. and Venkataramu, C.V. 1973. Effect of
storage on the moisture content of mulberry leaves. Indian J. Seric.12:13-21.
Khanure, S.K., 1999. Stability analysis for grain protein content in Rabi Sorghum.
Madras Agric. J., 86(1-3):49-50.
Krishnaswami, S. 1986. Mulberry cultivation in South India. Central Silk Board,
Bangalore. Pp 19-23.
Kroonenberg, P.M. 1995. Introduction to biplots for GxE tables. Res. Rep. 51.
Dep. Of Mathematics, Univ. of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
-
Kumar, P., Bhutia, R. and Ahsan, M.M. 1993. Sericulture is a remunerative in the
Darjeeling hills. Indian Farming 43(2):22-25.
Kundu, S, and Khurana, S.R. 1988. Stability for seed yield and its components in
toria (Brassica campestris). Indian J. Genet., 48(3):389-391.
Landauski, M.M. 1951. Preliminary study of the different factors influencing the
rooting of mulberry cuttings. Revue Du Ver a Soie., 11 1 :259-269.
Lerner, L.M. 1954. Genetic homeostasis. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburg.
Lewis, D. 1954. Gene-environment interaction. A relationship between dominance
heterosis, phenotypic stability and variability. Heredity 8:333-356.
Lin, C.S., Binns, M.R. and Lefkovitch, L.P. 1986. Stability analysis: Where do we
stand? Crop Sci., 26:894:900.
Lush, J.L. (1949). Heritability of quantitative characters in farm animal. Hereditas
(SUPPI.) 35:356-357.
Luthra, O.P., Singh, R.K. and Kakar, S.N. 1974. Comparison of different stability
models in wheat. Theoretical Applied Genetics 45:143-149.
-
Mala, V.R. and Basavaiah, 1991. lmprovement of rooting ability in selection
variety. lndian Silk, 30(8): 26-28.
Ma, B.L., Yan, W., Dwyer, L.M., Fregeau-Reid, J., Voldeng, H.D., Dion, Y. and
Nass, H. 2004. Graphic analysis of genotypes, environment, nitrogen
fertilizer and their interactions on Spring wheat yield. Agron. J. 96:169-180.
Manual, W.W., Vivekananda, P. and Ranganathan, T.B. 1997. G x E interaction in
short duration rice. Madras Agric. J. 84(2):89-91.
Masilamani, S., Nagaraj, B. and Thiagarajan, V. 1996a. Pruning of mulberry for
economic leaf yields under hill conditions. lndian Farming 46(3):17-20.
Masilamani, S. and Kamble, C.K. 1998. Genetic variation, heritability, correlation
and path analysis in mulberry. Madras Agric. J., 85(1):41-44.
Masilamani, S., Sarkar, A., Jayaswal, K.P., Sudhakaran, M. and Datta, R.K. 2000a.
Regional adaptation of V1 mulberry genotype in the hill areas. National
Conference on strategies for sericulture research and development, CSR&TI,
Mysore, India, 16-1 8, November 2000. p.12.
Masilamani, S., Thiagarajan, V. and Balasubramanian, S. 1996b. Stability analysis
for leaf yield in mulberry (Morus alba L.). lndian J. Agric. Sci., 66(2):117-118.
-
Masilarnani, S., Thiagarajan, V., Nagaraj, 6. and Balasubramanian, S. 2000b.
Genetic variation, heritability and path analysis in mulberry. Sericulture in
India. &: Agarwal H.O. and Seth, M.K. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh,
Dehradun, India. pp:517-526.
Masilamani, S., Thiagarajan, V., Susheelamma., B.N. and Datta, R.K. 1996c. Path
analysis for leaf yield components in mulberry (Morus spp.) grown under high
altitude conditions. Sericologia 36(3):461-467.
Mather, K. and Jones, R.M. 1958. Interaction of environment in continious
variation. 1. Description. Biometrics 14:343-359.
Minarnizawa, K. 1997. Moriculture - Science of Mulberry Cultivation (Translated
from Japanese by Hirano, H. and Kuriok, A.) Oxford and IBH Publishing Pvt.
Ltd., New Delhi, India.
Misra, A.K., Das, B.K. and Ahsan, M.M. 1995. High yielding BC-2-59 mulberry
variety is suitable for Darjeeling hills. Indian Farming 44(11):30-31.
Misra, R.C. and Ahmed, M. (1987). Manual on Irrigation Agronomy. Oxford and
IBH Publishing Co. Pvt., New Delhi, p.412.
-
Mohanty, A.R and Dhas, R.A.C. 1995. Prospects of sericulture industry in Tamil
Nadu by 2001. lndian Silk, March, 1995.
Mukund , V.K. 1987. Control of soil acidity for better mulberry growth. lndian silk
25(11):20-22.
Nagarajan, R. 1983. Studies on genotypic-environment interactions in selected
sugarcane cultivars for various yield and quality attributes. Ph.D. thesis,
TNAU.
Nanavaty, M.M. 1965. Silk from grub to glamour. Paramount Publishing House,
Bombay, India.
Narayan Praksh, R., Periasamy, K and Radhakrishnan, S. (1985). Effect of
dietary water content on food utilization and silk production in Bombyx mori L.
(Lepidoptera: Bombycidae). lndian J. Seric., 24: 12-17.
Nelson, R.L. and Schweitzer, L.E. 1988. Evaluating soyabean germplasm for
specific leaf weight. Crop Sci., 28:647-649.
Ogiere, M. 1978. Time for assessing various characters in mulberry breeding.
Bull. Seric. Expt. Stn., 27(2):243-278.
-
Panse, V. G. 1957. Genetics of quantitative characters in relation to plant
breeding. lndian J. Genet., 17:318-328.
Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. 1967. Statistical methods for agricultural
workers. Indian Council of Agril. Research, New Delhi.
Paroda, R.S. and Hayes, J.D. 1971. An investigation of genotype-environment
interactions for rate of ear emergence in Spring barley. Heredity 26:157-175.
Patil, S.V., Mallikarjunappa, R.S., Bongale, U.D. and Dandin, S.B. 2000. Genetic
parameters in relation to leaf yield in mulberry (Morus alba L.,). Proc.
National Seminar on Tropical Sericulture, December 28, Bangalore, 14-17 p.
Patil, V.S. 2002. Selection indexes for leaf yield parameters in mulberry (Morus
alba L.). Adv. Plant Sci., 15 (11):559-564.
Patil, S.V., Mallikarjunappa, R.S. and Eswara Rao, M.S. 2002. Heritability and
correlation for leaf yield parameters in mulberry (Morus alba L.). Advances in
Plant Sci., 15(11) :565-571.
Paul, D.C., Subba Rao, G. and Deb, D.C. 1992. Impact of dietary moisture on
nutritional indices and growth of Bombyx mori and concomitant larval
duration. J. Insect Physiol., 38(3):229-235.
-
Perkins, J.M. and Jinks., J.L. 1968. Environmental and genotype environmental
components of variability. III.Multiple lines and crosses. Heredity 23:339-356.
Plaisted, R.L. and Peterson, L.C. 1959. A technique for evaluating the ability of
selection to yield consistency in different locations and seasons. Potato J.,
361381-385.
Prakash, B.G., Sarkar, A. and Chaturvedi, H.K. 1994. Selection environment in
mulberry (Morus spp.) by joint scoring of yield and its components. Proc. of
7'h International Congress of SABRA0 and WSAA, Vol.1: 333-337.
Prakash, B.G., Sarkar, A., Chaturvedi, H.K. and Bajpai, A.K., 1992. Variability in
some crosses of mulberry. National Conference on mulberry sericulture
research, CSR&TI, Mysore, 10-11 December, 1992, pp.4.
Prasad, D.N. 1989. Multilocational trials of mulberry. In: Genetic Resources of
mulberry and utilization. m: K.Sengupta and S.B.Dandin, CSR&TI, Mysore, pp 203-21 0.
Prasad, R.N., Sarkar, A., Chaturvedi, H.K. and Datta, R.K. 1992. Variability in
seedling vigour in mulberry. National Conference on mulberry sericulture
research, CSR&TI, Mysore, 10-11 December, 1992, pp.5.
-
Prasad, R.N., Sarkar, A., Ctaaturvedi, H.K. and Datta, R.K. 1995. Relationship of
seed size and early vigour to field performance of adult plants in mulberry.
Proc. Of XV international Sericuiture Commission Congress, Bondung,
Indonesia.
Rahman, M.S., Sarkar, A., Chaturvedi, H.K. 1994. Association of characters of
leaf production in germplasm mulberry varieties. Bull. Sericult. Res., 5:9-13.
Rajarathinam, S. and Subbaraman, N. 1997. Regression analysis of genotype x
environment interaction in hirsuturn cotton genotypes. Madras Agric. J.,
84(4): 228-229.
Raju, H.L., Sathyan, B.A. and Rangaiah, S. 1992. Studies on genetic variability,
correlation and path analysis in M I generation in mulberry (Morus indica L.,).
National Conference on mulberry sericulture research, CSR&TI, Mysore, 10-
11 December, 1992, pp.19.
Rangaswamy,G., Narasimhanna, M.N., Sastry, C.R and Jolly, M.S., 1976.
Sericulture manual 1. Mulberry cultivation, FAO, Rome, pp.25.
Rao, L.S.P. and Khan, A.A. 1963. Vegetative propagation of Japanese mulberry
varieties by use of growth regulators. Indian J. Seric., 1(3):7-23.
-
Rao, M.S.E., Dandin, S.B. and Mallikkarjunappa, R.S. 2002. Evaluation of
tetraploid and triploid mulberry genotypes for propagation, growth and yield
parameters. In: Advances in lndian Sericulture Research. Published by
Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Mysore, pp 8-40.
Rasid Trag, A., Mistri, A.K. and Basharath, D.D. (2001). Strategies for the
development of sericulture in Jammu and Kashmir in the new millennium.
National Seminar on Mulberry Sericulture Research in India. Karnataka State
Sericulture Research and Development Institute, Bangalore, ppll-17.
Ravi, K.N., Hittalmani, S., Shankar, M.A. and Varangabhushana, 1992a. Stability
analysis for qualitative parameters in mulberry (Morus spp.,). National
Conference on mulberry sericulture research, CSR&TI, Mysore, 10-1 1
December, 1992, pp.6.
Ravi, K.N., Hittalmani, S. and Shashidhar, H.E. 1992b. Stability analysis of leaf
yield in mulberry. National Conference on mulberry sericulture research,
CSR&TI, Mysore, 10-1 1 December, 1992, pp.7.
Ravikumar, C. 1988. Western ghats as a bivoltine region- Prospects, challenges
and strategies for its development. Indian Silk 26 (9):39-54.
-
Roy, B.N., Das, B.C. and Prasad, D.N. 1983. Study of some traits of mulberry
towards its effective selection. National Seminar of Silk Research and
Development, Bangalore, March 10-13, p.57.
Rubio, J., Cubero, J.I., Martin, L.M., Suso, M.J., Flores, F. 2004. Biploy analysis of
trait relations of white lupin in Spain. Euphytica 135(2):217-224.
Sahu, P.K., Yadav, B.R.D. and Saratchandra, B. 1995. Evaluation of yield
component in mulberry germplasm varieties. Acta Bot.lndica 23(2):191-195.
Saini, S.S., Sindhu, G.S., Ish Kumar and Goombar, T.S., 1974. Phenotypic
stability for yield of some rice varieties. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 44544-647.
Salisbury, F.B. and Ross, C.W. 1984. Hormones and growth regulators, auxins
and gibberellins. In: Plant Physiology, Ill Edition, CBS Publishers, Delhi,
India, pp.309-319.
Sarkar, A. 1993. Effects of feeding different races of silkworm (Bombyx mori L.)
with mulberry (Morus indica L.) leaves varying in ploidy level. Sericologia
33125-34.
Sarkar, A., Das, B.C. and Chakraborty, S.P. 1986. Yield stability in mulberry.
Indian J. Agric. Sci., 56(4):305-306.
-
Sarkar, A., Chaturvedi, H.K. and Datta, R.K. 1992. Use of indirect selection in
mulberry. Proc. Of fourth All India Conference on cytology and genetics
symposium on mulberry and silkworm organized by Society of Cytologists and
Geneticists, India: 131-1 32.
Sarkar, A., Roy, B.N., Gupta, K.K. and Das, B.C. (1987). Character association in
mulberry under close planting. lndian J. Seric., 26(2):76-78.
Sastry C,R., Jolly, MS., Subramaniam, M.R. and Madhava Rao, Y.R. 1988.
Studies on the varietal differences in the loss of moisture from harvested
mulberry leaves. Indian J. Seric., 27(2):85-91.
Satish Rao, C. 1989. Stability analysis of varietal performance under optimal and
sub-optimal environments in sugar cane. Ph.D., thesis, Kurukshetra Univ.
Sau, H., Sahu, P.K., Yadav, B.R.D. and Saratchandra, B. 1995. Evaluation of
mulberry (Morus spp.,) genetic resources- sprouting, survival and rooting
ability. J. Environ, Res., 3:ll-13.
Sengupta, K., Singh, B.D. and Mustafi, J.C. (1971). A study on the effect of time of
harvest of mulberry leaf on silkworm cocoon crop and cocoon quality. lndian
J. Seric. 10:l-5.
-
Sharma, S.M., 1987. Studies on propagation, growth and yield attributes of some
mulberry (Morus spp.,) genotypes. STS dissertation, ICTRETS, CSR&TI,
Mysore.
Shukla, G.K. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-
environmental components of variability. Heredity 29:237-245.
Sikdar, A.K. 1990. Qualitative and quantitative improvement of mulberry (Morus
spp.) by induction of polyploidy. Ph.D., Thesis, University of Mysore, Mysore,
India. pp. 114-125.
Singh, P. 1996. Essentials of plant breeding. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, p90.
Singh, K.P., Gowda, P. and Rarnesh Babu, M.1993. Package of practices of
mulberry cultivation in the Nilgiris. Indian Farming 43(2):20-21.
Singh, P. and Narayanan, S.S. 1993. Biometrical techniques in plant breeding.
Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, p.83.
Singh, U. and Singh, P. 1975. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability
in Lentil (Lens esculenta Moench.). Madras Agric. J., 62(9):57-58.
-
Singhvi, N.R. 2002. Interrelations among yield components and leaf yield in
mulberry. Plant Archives 2(2):295-296.
Singhvi, N.R., Chakraborty, S., Singhal, B.K., Rekha, M., Sarkar, A. and Datta,
R.K. 1998. Character association of leaf yield traits in mulberry. Bull. Sericul.
Res., 983-84.
Singhvi, N.R., Chakraborty, S., Singhal, B.K., Rekha, M., Sarkar, A. and Datta,
R.K. 2001a. Genetic analysis of leaf yield and its attributes in mulberry.
Advances in Plant Science, 14(1):105-109.
Singhvi, N.R., Chakraborty, S., Singhal, B.K., Rekha, M., Sarkar, A. and Datta,
R.K. 2001b. Cause and effect relationship of leaf yield in mulberry as
influenced by morphological and physiological traits in mulberry. Bull. Ind.
Acad. Seri., 5(2):31-33.
Sujathamma, P. and Dandin, S.B. 1998. Evaluation of mulberry (Morus spp.,)
genotypes for propagation parameters. Indian J. Seric., 37(2):133-136.
Sunil Holkar, V.K., Mishra, V.K. and Billore, S.D. 1991. Phenotypic stability of
seed yield in pigeon pea under dryland conditions. Crop Res., 4:247-252.
-
Susheelarnma, B.N. and Jolly, M.S. 1986. Evaluation of morpho-physiological
parameters associated with drought resistance in mulberry. Indian J. Seric.
25(1):6-14.
Susheelarnma, B.N., Jolly, MS., Giridhar, K., Dwivedi, N.K. and Suryanarayana,
N. 1988. Correlation and path analysis in mulberry under stress and non-
stress conditions. Sericologia 28(2):239-243.
Susheelarnma, B.N., Jolly, M.S. and Sengupta, K. 1989. Evaluation of germplasm
for stress tolerance. In: Genetic resources in mulberry and utilization,
K.Sengupta and S.B.Dandin (m), CSR&TI, Mysore, India, pp.153-158.
Susheelamma, B.N., Jolly, M.S., Sengupta, K., Giridhar, K., Baksh, S., Mogili, T.,
Mallikarjunappa, R.S. and Pavankumar, T. 1992a. Statistical analysis of
adaptability of drought resistant mulberry genotypes. Sericologia 32(4):619-
628.
Susheelamma, B.N., Kumar, J.S., Sikdar, A.K., Dandin, S.B., Jolly, M.S. and
Sengupta, K. 199213. Exploitation of promising mulberry germplasm
genotypes for yield potentiality. Sericologia, 32 (2): 295-300.
-
Susheelamma, B.N., Masilamani, S., Thiagarajan, V., Rajashekar, K. and Datta,
R.K. 1997. Semigraphical method of analyzing genetic variation in mulberry
(Morus spp.). Indian J. Plant Gent. Res., -l0(1):69-78.
Tai, G.C.C. 1971. Genotypic stability analysis and its application to potato regional
trials. Crop Sci. 11:184-190.
Tazima, Y. 1985. Report on sericulture industry in India. Central Silk Board,
Bangalore.
Thiagarajan, V., Masilamani, S., Ahsan, M.M. and Datta, R.K. 1994. Stability
analysis of economic traits in silkworm (Bombyx mori L.). J. Genet. & Breed.
48:357-364.
Tikader, A. 1997. Studies on heritabilities, genetic parameters and response to
selection in mulberry germplasm accession. Bull. Seric. Research, 8:19-22.
Tikader, A and Rao, A.A, 2002. Phenotypic variation in mulberry (Morus spp.)
Germplasm. Sericologia 42(2):221-233.
Tikader, A., Vijayan, K., Roy, B.N. and Pavan Kumar, T. 1996. Studies on
propagation efficiency of mulberry (Morus spp.,) at ploidy level. Sericologia
361345349.
-
Tojyo, 1 . 1985. Research of polyploidy and its application in Morus. JARQ
18r222-228.
Trethowan, R.M., Ginkel, M.V., Ammar, K., Crossa, J., Payne, T.S., Cukadar, B.,
Rajararn, S. and Hernandex, E. 2003. Associations among twenty years of
international bread wheat yield evaluation of environments. Crop
Sci.43:1698-1711.
Umesh, V (2001). Status of sericulture in Karnataka. National Seminar on
Mulberry Sericulture Research in India. Karnataka State Sericulture
Research and Development Institute, Bangalore, pp 34-37.
Venkateswaralu, 1 (2001). Status of sericulture in Andhra Pradesh, National
Seminar on Mulberry Sericulture Research in India. Karnataka State
Sericulture Research and Development Institute, Bangalore, pp 18-20..
Vijayan, K., Tikader, A., Chakroborti, S.P. and Roy, B.N. 1997. Correlation studies
in mulberry (Morus spp.). Indian J. Genet., 57:455460.
Vijayan, K., Tikader, A., Das, K., Roy, B.N. and Pavan Kumar, T. 1996. Genotypic
influence on leaf moisture content and moisture retention capacity in mulberry
(Morus sp.,). Bull. Sericult. Res., 7:95-98.
-
Weaver, R.J. and Johnson, J.O. 1985. Relation of plant hormones to nutrient
mobilization and the internal environment of the plant. Supply of mineral
nutrients and photosynthate. In: Encyclopaedia of plant physiology.
Hormones regulation of development , Pharsi, R.P. and Reddi, D.M. (m.), Springer Verlag, p.4.
Wricke, G. 1962. Uber eine Methode zur Erfassung der okologischen Streubreite
in Feldversuchen. Z. Pflanzenzuechi, 47:92-96.
Yan, W. 1999. Methodology of cultivar evaluation based on yield trial data - with
special reference in winter wheat in Ontario. Ph.D Thesis, University of
Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Yan, W. 2001. GGE biplot-a Windows application for graphical analysis of multi-
environment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agron. J. 93:1111-
1118.
Yan, W., Corenelius, P.L., Crossa, J. and Hunt, L.A. 2001. Two types of GGE
biplots for analyzing multi-environment trial data. Crop Sci. 41:656-663.
Yan, W. and Hunt, L.A. 2002. Biplot analysis of diallel data. Crop Sci. 42:21-30.
-
Yan, W., Hunt, L.A., Sheng, Q. and Szlavnics, Z. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and
mega-environment investigation based on GGE biplot. Crop Sci.40:597-605.
Yan, W. and Kang, M.S. 2003. GGE biplot analysis: A graphical tool for breeders,
geneticists, and agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Yan, W. and Rajcan, 1. 2002. Biplot evaluation of test sites and trait relations of
soybean in Ontario. Crop Sci. 42:ll-20.
Yang, J.H. and Yang, X.H. 1991. Research on polyploidy and polyploidy breeding
in mulberry in China. Sericologia 31(4):625-630.
Yates, F. and Cochran, W.G. 1938. The analysis of group of experiment. J. Agric.
Sci., 28:556-580.
Yue G, Perng, S.K., Walter, T.L., Wassom, C.E. and Liang, G.H. 1990. Stability
analysis of yield in maize, wheat and sorghum and its implications in breeding
programme. Plant Breeding 104:72-80.