64-channel uwb wireless neural vector analyzer and phase synchrony-triggered...

4
64-Channel UWB Wireless Neural Vector Analyzer and Phase Synchrony-Triggered Stimulator SoC Karim Abdelhalim, Hamed Mazhab Jafari, Larysa Kokarovtseva, Jose Luis Perez Velazquez, Roman Genov Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada; Email: [email protected] Brain and Behavior Programme and Division of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Canada Abstract— A UWB 64-channel responsive neural stimulator is presented. It wirelessly monitors magnitude, phase and phase synchronization of neural signals. Abnormal phase synchrony triggers programmable-waveform biphasic current-mode stim- ulation in a closed loop. To implement these functionalities, the SoC integrates 64 neural recording amplifiers with tunable switched-capacitor (SC) bandpass filters, 64 multiplying 8-bit SAR ADCs, 64 programmable 16-tap FIR filters, a tri-core CORDIC processor, 64 biphasic current stimulation channels, and a 3.1-10.4GHz UWB wireless transmitter onto a 4mm × 3mm 0.13μm CMOS die. The SoC dissipates 1.4mW/1.5mW when recording/stimulating and has been validated in early detection and abortion of epileptic seizures in freely moving rodents on-line and in early seizure detection in humans off-line. I. I NTRODUCTION Abnormal coordinated interactions in various regions of the brain are widely recognized as key indicators of pathological brain states in numerous neurological disorders such as those listed in Fig. 1. Quantifying phase synchronization among neural oscillations is effective for diagnostics, monitoring or treatment of such disorders. For example, in epilepsy large fluctuations of phase synchrony in narrow frequency bands within the neural signal spectrum are among the earliest precursors of an upcoming seizure [1]. Detecting the seizure before it develops is critical in a closed-loop implantable neural stimulator. Chances of aborting a seizure are much higher if responsive electrical stimulation takes place before one fully develops [1]. Previously reported integrated neural interfaces [2]–[6] and commercial neural stimulators currently lack this capability. We present a wireless 0.13μm CMOS SoC with 64 neural recording channels that performs neural vector analysis and responsive neural stimulation based on phase synchrony. It is the first reported on-chip neural vector analyzer to process not only the magnitude, but also the phase of neural signals. It is also the first SoC to demonstrate real-time on-chip computation of the phase synchrony among neural signals and to demonstrate on-chip closed-loop stimulation based on bivarite signal processing. This approach has shown promise to outperform other methods used in commercially available neural stimulators for epilepsy treatment [1]. II. VLSI ARCHITECTURE The functional diagram is depicted in Fig. 1. The loop consists of the neural vector analyzer in the feed-forward path and the phase synchrony-triggered neural stimulator in the DEPTH ELECTRODES 32 32 64 ARRAY ECoG ANIMAL BRAIN NEURAL VECTOR ANALYZER 0 90 o o LNA 0 90 o o LNA MAG MAG TRIGGERED CURRENT-MODE STIMULATOR HILBERT ALLPASS ALLPASS HILBERT I I Q Q PHASE SYNCHRONY-TRIGGERED STIMULATOR X32 X64 32 32 32 32 64 WIRELESS TX BAND SELECT PHASE LOCKING VALUE (PLV) PHASE, MAGNITUDE AND PHASE SYNCHRONIZATION COMPUTATION 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 ABNORMAL SYNCHRONY NON-CONVULSIVE EPILEPSY CONVULSIVE EPILEPSY PARKINSON’S DISEASE AUTISM TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY NEUROLOGICAL DISORDER FREQ. BAND 3-4Hz 4-100Hz 3-10Hz 4-30Hz 3-15Hz Ø ΔØ Ø Fig. 1. Frequency bands of neurological disorders abnormal phase synchrony and a simplified functional diagram of the SoC. feedback. Pairs of neural signals are amplified and filtered in a narrow pass-band in which abnormal synchrony is mon- itored. In-phase (I) and quadrature-phase (Q) components are computed by allpass and Hilbert filters, respectively. I and Q are used to compute magnitude, phase, and phase difference of the signals which are then wirelessly monitored. Phase locking value (PLV), a common metric of phase synchrony, is computed in the feedback. The current-mode stimulator is triggered when the PLV indicates abnormal phase synchrony levels. In epilepsy, seizure precursors are abnormally large fluctuations in PLV which can be detected by thresholding. A detailed block diagram of the SoC is presented in Fig. 2. There are 64 ADCs organized in a scalable manner, one per neural input, for raw neural data monitoring (not shown). In the phase synchrony computation mode, the ADCs are re-configured as multiplying ADCs (MADCs) to perform multiplications, the most computationally intensive operations in allpass and Hilbert FIR filters. A bank of eight MADCs combined with a 16-tap folded add-and-delay line yields a 16-tap transposed symmetric mixed-signal FIR filter. MADCs are time-multiplexed among eight neural inputs and eight add- and-delay lines to comprise eight FIR filters [7]. The use of in-channel MADCs eliminates 64 8-bit digital multipliers clocked at 8× sampling rate. As opposed to [7], in this design, two sets of filters, eight allpass and eight Hilbert FIR filters, are implemented to compute I and Q components, respectively, in two sets of eight recording channels. These circuits are repeated four times to accommodate 64 inputs. The phase, magnitude and phase synchronization processor utilizes three digital CORDIC cores [8]. The computed PLV value is 978-1-4673-2213-3/12/$31.00 ©2012 IEEE 281

Upload: others

Post on 28-Jan-2021

10 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 64-Channel UWB Wireless Neural Vector Analyzerand Phase Synchrony-Triggered Stimulator SoC

    Karim Abdelhalim, Hamed Mazhab Jafari, Larysa Kokarovtseva†, Jose Luis Perez Velazquez†, Roman GenovDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada; Email: [email protected]

    †Brain and Behavior Programme and Division of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Canada

    Abstract— A UWB 64-channel responsive neural stimulator ispresented. It wirelessly monitors magnitude, phase and phasesynchronization of neural signals. Abnormal phase synchronytriggers programmable-waveform biphasic current-mode stim-ulation in a closed loop. To implement these functionalities,the SoC integrates 64 neural recording amplifiers with tunableswitched-capacitor (SC) bandpass filters, 64 multiplying 8-bitSAR ADCs, 64 programmable 16-tap FIR filters, a tri-coreCORDIC processor, 64 biphasic current stimulation channels,and a 3.1-10.4GHz UWB wireless transmitter onto a 4mm × 3mm0.13µm CMOS die. The SoC dissipates 1.4mW/1.5mW whenrecording/stimulating and has been validated in early detectionand abortion of epileptic seizures in freely moving rodents on-lineand in early seizure detection in humans off-line.

    I. INTRODUCTION

    Abnormal coordinated interactions in various regions of thebrain are widely recognized as key indicators of pathologicalbrain states in numerous neurological disorders such as thoselisted in Fig. 1. Quantifying phase synchronization amongneural oscillations is effective for diagnostics, monitoring ortreatment of such disorders. For example, in epilepsy largefluctuations of phase synchrony in narrow frequency bandswithin the neural signal spectrum are among the earliestprecursors of an upcoming seizure [1]. Detecting the seizurebefore it develops is critical in a closed-loop implantableneural stimulator. Chances of aborting a seizure are muchhigher if responsive electrical stimulation takes place beforeone fully develops [1]. Previously reported integrated neuralinterfaces [2]–[6] and commercial neural stimulators currentlylack this capability.

    We present a wireless 0.13µm CMOS SoC with 64 neuralrecording channels that performs neural vector analysis andresponsive neural stimulation based on phase synchrony. It isthe first reported on-chip neural vector analyzer to processnot only the magnitude, but also the phase of neural signals.It is also the first SoC to demonstrate real-time on-chipcomputation of the phase synchrony among neural signalsand to demonstrate on-chip closed-loop stimulation based onbivarite signal processing. This approach has shown promiseto outperform other methods used in commercially availableneural stimulators for epilepsy treatment [1].

    II. VLSI ARCHITECTURE

    The functional diagram is depicted in Fig. 1. The loopconsists of the neural vector analyzer in the feed-forward pathand the phase synchrony-triggered neural stimulator in the

    D

    EP

    TH

    E

    LEC

    TR

    OD

    ES

    32

    32

    64

    ARRAYECoG

    ANIMAL BRAIN

    NEURAL VECTOR ANALYZER

    0

    90

    o

    o

    LNA

    0

    90

    o

    oLNA

    MAG

    MAG

    TRIGGERED CURRENT-MODE

    STIMULATOR

    HILBERT

    ALLPASS

    ALLPASS

    HILBERT

    I

    I

    Q

    Q

    PHASE SYNCHRONY-TRIGGERED STIMULATOR

    X32

    X64

    32

    32

    32

    32

    64

    WIR

    ELE

    SS

    TX

    BAND SELECT

    PH

    AS

    E L

    OC

    KIN

    GV

    ALU

    E (

    PLV

    )

    PH

    AS

    E, M

    AG

    NIT

    UD

    E A

    ND

    PH

    AS

    ES

    YN

    CH

    RO

    NIZ

    AT

    ION

    C

    OM

    PU

    TA

    TIO

    N

    0

    0

    0

    1

    1

    1

    0

    1

    ABNORMAL SYNCHRONY

    NON-CONVULSIVE EPILEPSYCONVULSIVE EPILEPSYPARKINSON’S DISEASEAUTISM

    TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY

    NEUROLOGICALDISORDER

    FREQ.BAND

    3-4Hz

    4-100Hz

    3-10Hz

    4-30Hz

    3-15Hz

    Ø

    ΔØ

    Ø

    Fig. 1. Frequency bands of neurological disorders abnormal phase synchronyand a simplified functional diagram of the SoC.

    feedback. Pairs of neural signals are amplified and filteredin a narrow pass-band in which abnormal synchrony is mon-itored. In-phase (I) and quadrature-phase (Q) components arecomputed by allpass and Hilbert filters, respectively. I and Qare used to compute magnitude, phase, and phase differenceof the signals which are then wirelessly monitored. Phaselocking value (PLV), a common metric of phase synchrony,is computed in the feedback. The current-mode stimulator istriggered when the PLV indicates abnormal phase synchronylevels. In epilepsy, seizure precursors are abnormally largefluctuations in PLV which can be detected by thresholding.

    A detailed block diagram of the SoC is presented in Fig. 2.There are 64 ADCs organized in a scalable manner, one perneural input, for raw neural data monitoring (not shown).In the phase synchrony computation mode, the ADCs arere-configured as multiplying ADCs (MADCs) to performmultiplications, the most computationally intensive operationsin allpass and Hilbert FIR filters. A bank of eight MADCscombined with a 16-tap folded add-and-delay line yields a16-tap transposed symmetric mixed-signal FIR filter. MADCsare time-multiplexed among eight neural inputs and eight add-and-delay lines to comprise eight FIR filters [7]. The useof in-channel MADCs eliminates 64 8-bit digital multipliersclocked at 8× sampling rate. As opposed to [7], in thisdesign, two sets of filters, eight allpass and eight HilbertFIR filters, are implemented to compute I and Q components,respectively, in two sets of eight recording channels. Thesecircuits are repeated four times to accommodate 64 inputs. Thephase, magnitude and phase synchronization processor utilizesthree digital CORDIC cores [8]. The computed PLV value is

    978-1-4673-2213-3/12/$31.00 ©2012 IEEE 281

  • Q

    I

    Q

    CU

    RR

    EN

    TD

    RIV

    ER

    CONTROLLER

    DU

    TY

    CY

    CLE

    ME

    MO

    RY

    AM

    PLI

    TU

    DE

    ME

    MO

    RY

    DIGITAL DUTY CYCLE

    I

    PH

    AS

    E L

    OC

    KIN

    G

    VA

    LUE

    C

    OM

    PU

    TA

    TIO

    NDECISION

    +

    -

    UW

    B T

    RA

    NS

    MIT

    TE

    R

    X64

    CO

    NT

    RO

    LLE

    R

    I OU

    T<

    0:63

    >

    BIPHASIC CURRENT-MODE

    STIMULATOR

    PHASE, MAGNITUDE AND PHASE

    SYNCH. PROCESSOR

    LNA0

    LNA7

    ANALOGFRONT END

    M0

    M7

    VIN

    0V

    RE

    F BANK OF 8 16-TAP FIR FILTERS

    FIROUT0

    MA

    DC

    BA

    NK

    X4

    SELECT

    VIN

    8

    ALL CLOCKS

    ∆ ∅

    0

    0

    1

    1

    4x12

    bits

    COEFFICENT MEMORY M0-M7

    8x8b

    4x12

    bits

    PLV

    NEURAL RECORDING AND FIR FILTERSRAW ADC OUTPUT

    MEMORYTHRESHOLD

    F

    OLD

    ED

    16-

    TA

    P

    AD

    D-D

    ELA

    Y L

    INE

    0I Q

    1.2V (ANALOG, DIGITAL, RF) 3.3V (STIM.)

    MASTER CLK

    TX OUT

    STIMULATION TRIGGER

    MA

    GN

    ITU

    DE

    AN

    D P

    HA

    SE

    CO

    MP

    UT

    AT

    ION

    VIN

    7V

    IN15

    FIROUT7

    MA

    GN

    ITU

    DE

    AN

    D P

    HA

    SE

    CO

    MP

    UT

    AT

    ION

    MA

    G0

    MA

    G1

    PLV

    F

    OLD

    ED

    16-

    TA

    P

    AD

    D-D

    ELA

    Y L

    INE

    7

    DAC

    ALLPASS FIR FILTERHILBERT FIR FILTER

    12 b

    its

    SCF0

    SCF7

    CORDIC

    Ø0

    Ø1

    Fig. 2. Detailed block diagram of the SoC.

    -

    +2-STAGE

    -

    +2-STAGE

    54dB-60dBGAIN fsc

    fsc

    16 fsc

    SC LPF

    -

    +

    fscC1

    C1

    C2

    C3

    C3

    CSC1

    VOUT

    HIGH-Q SC BPF

    CSC2

    V

    REF

    IN

    V

    LNA

    CH0

    CH7

    -

    +2-STAGE

    RC LPF

    Fig. 3. Neural recording channel.

    compared with programmed stimulation criteria. When trig-gered, the 64-channel neural stimulator generates individuallyprogrammable biphasic currents. A UWB wireless transmittersends raw ADC data, neural vector parameters and PLV off-chip. All control signals are generated by an on-chip controller.

    III. CIRCUIT IMPLEMENTATION

    Fig. 3 depicts the circuit implementation of the analogfront-end. Two stages of AC-coupled capacitive feedbackamplifiers provide 54-60dB programmable gain. The first stageis chopper stabilized. The high linearity of the second stageis achieved by biasing subthreshold MOS transistors with aconstant voltage generated by source followers [7]. The 2nd-order bi-quad switched capacitor (SC) BPF with the qualityfactor of 3.2 selects a narrow neural band of interest. TheSC LPF removes aliasing components introduced by the BPF.A subsequent compact tuneable buffered RC LPF removesaliasing caused by the SC LPF.

    Fig. 4(a) shows the circuit implementation of a set of 8-channel recording and stimulation signal paths. To extractthe real and imaginary components the RC LPF drives twosets of eight parallel successive approximation register (SAR)MADCs. Each MADC requires an MDAC that uses a binary-weighted split-capacitor DAC. It multiplies two digital valuesat the cost of a small overhead of three two-input logic gates

    2x16-TAP FIR FILTER

    SAR

    M0IOUT (I)

    MDAC

    MADC0

    SAR

    M7I

    MDAC

    MADC7

    0

    RAW ADC

    FIR

    RAW ADC

    FIR

    OUT (Q)0

    M0Q

    M7Q

    (a) NEURAL RECORDING CHAN.

    LNA0

    SC BPF0 SC LPF0

    VR

    EF

    IN0

    V

    CH0

    CH7

    RF

    MA

    NC

    HE

    ST

    ER

    EN

    CO

    DE

    D D

    AT

    A IN

    C

    C

    COUT

    (b)

    RC LPF

    IOU

    T

    NEURAL STIMULATION CHANNEL

    AM

    P.

    DUTY CYCLE

    SAR

    MDAC

    MADCGLOBAL SCALE

    V/ICONV.

    UP

    DO

    WN

    3.3V

    REUSED

    MEMORY

    ME

    MO

    RY

    (c)

    8

    8

    FIRFIR

    Fig. 4. Integrated circuit implementation of (a) eight neural recordingchannels for I/Q separation, (b) the UWB transmitter and (c) the neuralstimulator.

    per bit. One set of eight MADCs implements an FIR filterprogrammed for an all pass-filter (I-extraction). The other setof eight MADCs, implements an FIR filter programmed for theHilbert transform (Q-extraction). In this mode, 32 recordingchannels utilize 64 FIR filters (32 allpass and 32 Hilbert FIRfilters) as shown for 8 channels in Fig. 4(a). Both the I andQ signals are sent to the on-chip digital processor. The 10-bit processor utilizes three CORDIC cores to simultaneouslycompute the magnitude, phase, phase difference and the phase-locking value per sample. Expensive multiplication operationsare eliminated as only shift operations are performed bythe CORDIC processor. An all-digital delay line-based UWBtransmitter shown in Fig. 4(b) generates a double-differentiatedGaussian pulse. The delay cells in all the paths are imple-mented as current-starved inverters to allow for tuning of theUWB pulse width for two different FCC bands (0-1GHz or3.1-10.4GHz).

    In the stimulation mode, the MDACs and SAR logic arereused in the neural stimulation channel for programmablewaveform generation as shown in Fig. 4(c). A V-I converterand a 3.3V biphasic current driver deliver the triggered stim-ulus. An in-channel 12-bit memory stores an 8-bit currentamplitude and a 4-bit duty cycle values. The reuse of MDACsand SAR logic eliminates 64 8-bit DACs and 64 digital dutycycle controllers.

    IV. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

    The micrograph of the 4mm × 3mm SoC implementedin a standard 1P8M 0.13µm CMOS technology is shown inFig. 5(a). There is a total of 1kB of on-chip memory andapproximately 1 million transistors. The layout of the channelincluding the neural recording amplifier, SC bandpass filter,biphasic current driver, SAR multiplying ADC/DAC and a 22-bit memory is depicted in Fig. 5(b). Each 300µm × 300µmchannel has a bondpad to be flip-chip bonded directly to amicroelectrode array.

    The experimentally measured results for the analog frontend are depicted in Fig. 6(a)-(c). The experimentally measuredfrequency response of the amplifiers and the SC filters forseveral frequency bands is shown in Fig. 6(d). An FFT of theADC output yields ENOB of 7.6-bits at 28 kS/s as presented

    282

  • Fig. 5. (a) Micrograph of the 4mm × 3mm 0.13µm CMOS SoC. (b) Layoutof the 300µm × 300µm recording and stimulation channel.

    0.1 1 10 100 1000 100000123

    FREQUENCY (Hz)

    TH

    D (

    %)

    INPUT AMPLITUDE=1.4mVPK-PK

    0.1 1 10 100 1000 10k0.01

    0.1

    1

    10

    FREQUENCY (Hz)

    NO

    ISE

    V/s

    qrt(

    Hz)

    )

    INPUT-REFERRED NOISE (1Hz-5kHz)=5.1 VRMSμ

    0.1 1 10 100 1000 1000040

    42

    44

    46

    48

    50

    52

    54

    FREQUENCY (Hz)

    GA

    IN (

    dB)

    (a)

    (b)

    (c)

    10 10035

    40

    45

    50

    55

    60

    INPUT FREQUENCY (Hz)

    MA

    G (

    dB)

    fsc=5.0kHzfsc=2.5kHzfsc=1.25kHzfsc=625Hz

    0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000−120

    −100

    −80

    −60

    −40

    −20

    0

    FREQUENCY (Hz)

    MA

    G (

    dB)

    INPUT FREQUENCY=640HzSAMPLE RATE=28KS/sENOB=7.6 bitsSNDR=47.5dB

    SFDR=62.4dB0 0.05 0.10 0.15

    −400

    −200

    0

    200

    400

    600

    TIME (s)INP

    UT

    −R

    EF

    ER

    RE

    D (

    µV)

    0 0.05 0.10 0.15

    −200

    −100

    0

    100

    200

    DIG

    ITA

    L O

    UT

    PU

    T LNA+SC BPF+HILBERT 16-TAP FIRLNA+SC BPF+ALLPASS 16-TAP FIR

    AMP+SC, INPUT=30Hz, 500μV SINUSOID

    TIME (s)(e)

    (d)

    (f)Fig. 6. Experimentally measured (a) input-referred noise, (b) frequencyresponse and (c) total-harmonic distortion (THD) of the neural recordingamplifier. (d) Experimentally measured frequency response of the neuralrecording amplifier and the SC BPF. (e) Experimentally measured FFT ofan in-channel ADC. (f) Experimentally measured I/Q separation includingthe full signal path of input.

    in Fig. 6 (e). Fig. 6(f) demonstrates experimentally computedI and Q components of the shown input fed through the fullsignal path.

    The full signal path from the input of the neural recordingchannel to the output of the digital processor was also exper-imentally characterized. Fig. 7(a) depicts the phase differencebetween two 100µV sinusoidal signals computed on-chip withless than 1.5 percent deviation from the ideal case. Fig. 7(b)shows the magnitude of a 30Hz 300µVpk sinusoid modulatedwith a higher-frequency sinusoid computed on-chip. Fig. 7(c)shows the PLV between two signals with the frequency ofone signal held at three fixed values and the frequency of theother swept. Fig. 7(d) depicts experimentally measured neuralstimulator output current into a saline solution for various am-plitude and duty cycle settings. The experimentally measuredUWB pulse in the 0-1GHz band is shown in Fig. 8(a). The

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10−0.4

    −0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    TIME (s)

    INP

    UT

    RE

    FE

    RR

    ED

    (m

    V)

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    TIME (s)

    DIG

    ITA

    L O

    UT

    PU

    T

    10 1000.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    1.1

    INPUT FREQUENCY OF SIGNAL2 (Hz)

    PH

    AS

    E L

    OC

    KIN

    G V

    ALU

    E (

    PLV

    ) INPUT SIGNAL1HELD AT 8Hz

    INPUT SIGNAL1HELD AT 30Hz

    INPUT SIGNAL1HELD AT 120Hz

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5−1

    −0.5

    0

    0.5

    1

    TIME (ms)

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5−0.1

    −0.05

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    TIME (ms)

    ELE

    CT

    RO

    DE

    VO

    LTA

    GE

    (V

    )

    64 A93 A154 A282 A532 A

    AMPLITUDE CONTROL

    DUTY CYCLE CONTROL

    µ

    0 50 100 150 200 250 300 3500

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    PHASE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN INPUTS (DEGREES)

    CO

    MP

    UT

    ED

    PH

    AS

    E

    D

    IFF

    ER

    EN

    CE

    (D

    EG

    RE

    ES

    )

    ELE

    CT

    RO

    DE

    VO

    LTA

    GE

    (V

    )

    (a)

    (b)

    (c)

    (d)

    µ

    µ

    µµ

    Fig. 7. (a) Experimentally measured results including the entire signalpath: (a) phase difference computation (b) magnitude computation (envelopeextraction) (c) PLV computed between two channels and (d) neural stimulatingcurrent into a saline solution.

    0 1 2 3 4−0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    TIME (µs)

    (V)

    0 1 2 430

    0.20.40.60.8

    1

    TIME (µs)

    (V)

    TRANSMITTED DATA (3.1-10.4GHz) @ 10Mb/s

    RECEIVED DATA (5cm, 3.1-10.4GHz)

    MANCHESTERENCODED

    DATA

    0 1 2 3 4 5

    −0.06−0.04−0.02

    00.020.040.06

    TIME (ns)

    RF

    OU

    T (

    V)

    0.1 1 20.5

    −100

    −80

    −60

    −40

    −20

    FREQUENCY (GHz)

    FCC INDOOR MASK

    (a)

    (b)

    (c)

    (d)

    0-1GHz BANDO

    UT

    PU

    T (

    dBm

    )

    Fig. 8. Experimentally measured results for the wireless transmitter: (a)UWB pulse in the 0-1GHz band and (b) output spectrum of the 0-1GHz UWBpulse. (c) Transmitted Manchester-encoded data at 10Mb/s and (d) wirelesslyreceived data from a 5cm distance modulated in the 3.1-10.4GHz band.

    measured output spectrum and the corresponding FCC maskfor the UWB transmitter operating in the 0 to 1GHz frequencyband is depicted in Fig. 8(b). Fig. 8(c) shows transmitted10MB/s Manchester encoded-data and Fig. 8(d) displays thewirelessly received UWB modulated data utilizing the 3.1-10.4GHz frequency band over a 5cm distance.

    The SoC was validated in on-line in vivo experiments ina population of 4 freely moving rats and in off-line humanECoG data. In animal studies, two types of rat models ofepilepsy were employed, non-convulsive epilepsy induced bygamma butyrolactone (GBL) and convulsive epilepsy inducedby kainic acid, both recorded and stimulated with 8 depthelectrodes. For rats, the SC BPF was set to either a 4Hz or 8Hzcenter frequency to capture the abnormal phase synchrony inthese frequency bands. An example of the experimental resultsfor non-convulsive seizures (4Hz) is shown in Fig. 9(a). GBLinjected at time t=0s induces a seizure at time t=222s. At timet=50s, 172s before the seizure starts, the PLV at 4Hz computedby the chip increases, resulting in an early seizure detection.

    283

  • Fig. 9. Results of in-vivo testing in freely moving rats demonstrating (a) early detection of a seizure triggered by a GBL injection, (b) early detection ofa seizure triggered by kainic acid injection, and (c) abortion of a seizure using the on-chip neural stimulator. (d) An example of a result of off-line humanseizure detection for a University of Toronto epilepsy patient.

    TABLE I

    STATE-OF-THE-ART NEURAL RECORDING AND/OR STIMULATION SOCS

    Spec. [5] [2] [4] [3] [7] THISWORK

    Pwr. Diss.(mW) 0.375 0.077 0.27 6.5 5.03 1.4/1.5Tech.(μm) 0.35 0.18 0.18 0.13 0.13 0.13Area(mm)2 10.9 6.25 2.7 25 12 12Supply(V) 1.5 1.0 1.8 1.2 1.2 1.2/3.3# Record Chan. 4 1 8 96 64 64Pwr/chan.(μW) 32.8 4 9 68 6.3 10Gain(dB) 52-66 72 - 56 54-60 54-60Noise(μVrms) 3.1 1.3 - 2.2 6.5 5.1fL3dB (Hz) 0.1 0.5 - 280 10 1fH3dB (Hz) 12k 100 - 10k 5k 5kCMRR(dB) 58 60 - - 75 78ADC SNDR 54.7 65 44 60.3 48.5 47.5SC Filter - BPF BPF BPF - BPFSignal Proc. Yes Yes Yes No Yes YesFIR Filters - 7x48T 1x22T - 64x16T 64x16TIIR Filters 1x1T - - - - -DSP - Feature - - - Tri-

    Extract CORDICUnivariate 4x 1x - - 64x 64xMag

    Operations Spike Mag Spike 64xφBivariate - - - - - 32xΔφ

    Operations 32xPLVClosed-loop Yes No Yes No No Yes

    Stimulation# Stim. Chan. 4 - 64 - - 64DAC Res.(bits) 6 - 7 - - 8Compliance(V) 3.2 - 1.8 - - 2Current(mA) 0-0.1 - 0-0.14 - - 0.01-1.2Duty Cycle Res. No - 6-bit - - 4-bitWireless TX Yes No No No Yes YesModulation FSK - - - FSK UWBDate-rate(Mb/s) - - - - 1.5 10TX Pwr.(mW) 0.2 - - - 3.7 0.1

    In Fig. 9(b), a convulsive seizure (8Hz) in a rat is induced bya kainic acid injection at time t=-5min and detected before theseizure starts. In Fig. 9(c), a 5Hz 100µA biphasic current burstthat starts early in the seizure successfully aborts it. Overall,on-chip responsive electrical stimulation aborted 80 percent ofall rat seizures. For spontaneous seizures in humans the SCBPF center frequency was set to 16Hz to capture abnormalsynchrony at that frequency. Fig. 9(d) depicts an example ofon-chip off-line early seizure detection in ECoG data recordedfrom an epilepsy patient at the Hospital for Sick Children inToronto.

    A comparitive analysis is given in Table I. This designdemonstrates advanced functionality among recently publishedstate-of-the-art neural recording and stimulation SoCs. It com-

    bines 64 recording channels with SC bandpass filters, 64stimulation channels, 64 programmable 16-tap FIR filters,a tri-core CORDIC processor and an UWB transmitter. Itcomputes phase and phase synchronization which triggersclosed-loop current-mode neural stimulation.

    V. CONCLUSION

    A 0.13µm CMOS wireless closed-loop neural recording andstimulation SoC is presented. The SoC has 64 neural recordingand stimulation channels. The on-chip neural vector analyzercomputes phase synchrony among inputs to trigger a closed-loop biphasic current-mode neural stimulation. The total powerdissipation is 1.4mW from a 1.2V supply in the recordingmode and 1.5mW from a 3.3V supply in the stimulation mode.The system was characterized in vivo and demonstrates earlyseizure detection and abortion in freely moving rodents andoff-line seizure detection in humans.

    REFERENCES

    [1] F. Mormann, R. G. Andrzejak, C. E. Elger, and K. Lehnertz, “Seizureprediction: the long and winding road,” Journal of Neurology, Brain, vol.130, no. 2, pp. 314–333, September 2007.

    [2] N. Verma, Ali Shoeb, J. Bohorquez, Joel Dawson, John Guttag, andAnantha P. Chandrakasan, “A micro-power EEG acquisition SoC withintegrated feature extraction processor for a chronic seizure detectionsystem,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 804–816,April 2010.

    [3] Hua Gao, Ross M. Walker, Paul Nuyujukian, Kofi A. A. Makinwa,Krishna V. Shenoy, Boris Murmann, and Teresa H. Meng, “HermesE:A 96-channel full data rate direct neural interface in 0.13µm CMOS,”IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1043–1055, April2012.

    [4] J. Lee, H. Rhew, D. R. Kipke, and M. P. Flynn, “A 64 channel pro-grammable closed-loop neurostimulator with 8 channel neural amplifierand logarithmic ADC,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 45, no.9, pp. 1935–1945, September 2010.

    [5] M. Azin, D. J. Guggenmos, S. Barbay, R. J. Nudo, and P. Mohseni, “Abattery-powered activity-dependent intracortical microstimulation IC forbrain-machine-brain interface,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol.46, no. 4, pp. 731–745, April 2011.

    [6] M S Chae, W Liu, Z Yang, T Chen, J Kim, M Sivaprakasam, and M Yuce,“A 128-channel 6mW wireless neural recording IC with on-the-fly spikesorting and UWB transmitter,” IEEE International Solid-State CircuitsConference Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 146–603, February 2008.

    [7] K. Abdelhalim and R. Genov, “915-MHz wireless 64-channel neuralrecording SoC with programmable mixed-signal FIR filters,” IEEEEuropean Solid-State Circuits Conference, pp. 223–226, September 2011.

    [8] K. Abdelhalim, V. Smolyakov, and R. Genov, “Phase-synchronizationearly epileptic seizure detector VLSI architecture,” IEEE Transactionson Biomedical Circuits and Systems, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 430–438, October2011.

    284