6.07.2004mid-term assessment london july 5-6 20041 wp 14 – high performance fiber reinforced...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
1
WP 14 – WP 14 – High Performance Fiber High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Reinforced Cementitious
CompositesComposites for Rehabilitationfor Rehabilitation
WP leader: WP leader: Dr. E. Denarié, MCS-EPFL (CH)Dr. E. Denarié, MCS-EPFL (CH)
Contractors:Contractors: MCS-EPFL (CH), Prof. E. BrühwilerMCS-EPFL (CH), Prof. E. BrühwilerDr. K. Habel, Dr. J.P. Charron, A. Kamen, J. Wuest, Dr. K. Habel, Dr. J.P. Charron, A. Kamen, J. Wuest, R. Gysler, S. DemierreR. Gysler, S. Demierre
LCPC (France), Dr. P. RossiLCPC (France), Dr. P. Rossi
TRL (UK), Dr. R. WoodwardTRL (UK), Dr. R. Woodward
![Page 2: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
2
OutlineOutline
1.1. Conceptual approachConceptual approach2.2. Properties of UHPFRCProperties of UHPFRC3.3. Objectives of WP 14Objectives of WP 144.4. Progress at mid termProgress at mid term5.5. State of the Art ReviewState of the Art Review6.6. Protective functionProtective function7.7. Structural responseStructural response8.8. Future works Future works 9.9. Expected benefitsExpected benefits10.10. ReferencesReferences
![Page 3: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
3
1. Conceptual approach1. Conceptual approach
Local « hardening » of critical zones subjected to severe mechanical or environmental loads
![Page 4: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
4
1.1. Ultra compact HPFRCC (UHPFRC) provide a Ultra compact HPFRCC (UHPFRC) provide a long-term durabilitylong-term durability in order to in order to avoid avoid multiple interventionsmultiple interventions on structures during on structures during their service life. their service life.
2.2. Ultra compact HPFRCC materials can be Ultra compact HPFRCC materials can be applied:applied:
• as thin as thin watertight overlayswatertight overlays , ,
• as as repair or reinforcement layers, repair or reinforcement layers, with a with a thickness from 20 to 50 mm, thickness from 20 to 50 mm, alone or alone or combined with reinforcement bars, combined with reinforcement bars,
• for for prefabricated elementsprefabricated elements such as curbs, such as curbs,
• in in critical zonescritical zones such as transitions from such as transitions from joints to the main structural elements. joints to the main structural elements.
MotivationMotivation
![Page 5: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
5
Rehabilitation strategyRehabilitation strategy
![Page 6: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
6
2. Ultra compact HPFRCC (UHPFRC)2. Ultra compact HPFRCC (UHPFRC)
• Ultra compact cementitious matrix.Ultra compact cementitious matrix.• Excellent resistance towards ingress of water, gases and detrimental Excellent resistance towards ingress of water, gases and detrimental
substances such as chloride contaminated water.substances such as chloride contaminated water.• Self-compacting.Self-compacting.• Reinforcement with short steel fibers (lReinforcement with short steel fibers (lff=10 mm) at a very high =10 mm) at a very high
dosage: 480 kg/mdosage: 480 kg/m33..• Outstanding mechanical properties with significant tensile strain Outstanding mechanical properties with significant tensile strain
hardening.hardening.
![Page 7: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
7
Mechanical properties of Mechanical properties of UHPFRCUHPFRC
UHPFRC(CEMTECmultiscale®)
NC
fcc
[MPa] 16851
Ecc [GPa] 48 38
fct [MPa] 11.0 3.4
fct,1st [MPa] 9.1 -
Tensile behaviour of UHPFRC
Mechanical properties at 28 days (mean values) NC: normal concrete
CEMTECmultiscale® developped by Rossi et al. (2002)
Habel (2004)
![Page 8: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
8
3. Objectives of WP 143. Objectives of WP 14
• Demonstrate applicability and advantages of Demonstrate applicability and advantages of HPFRCC materials for the rehabilitation of HPFRCC materials for the rehabilitation of concrete road infrastructure components concrete road infrastructure components (including aspects of global Life-Cycle-Cost in (including aspects of global Life-Cycle-Cost in relation with WP relation with WP 112). 2).
• Make a first step towards the optimisation of Make a first step towards the optimisation of these materials for rehabilitation. these materials for rehabilitation.
• Provide guidelines for use of these materials Provide guidelines for use of these materials and their further optimisation (numerical and their further optimisation (numerical simulation tools, test methods, limit states for simulation tools, test methods, limit states for design, etc.)design, etc.)..
![Page 9: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
9
• Properties in fresh state – processing.Properties in fresh state – processing.• Combination with bituminous concrete (adhesivityCombination with bituminous concrete (adhesivity). . • Early age and long term behavior.Early age and long term behavior.• Mechanical compatibility with substrate.Mechanical compatibility with substrate.• Physico-chemical compatibility with substrate.Physico-chemical compatibility with substrate.• Protective function - effect of damage on transport Protective function - effect of damage on transport
properties.properties.• Influence of geometry of element to be repaired.Influence of geometry of element to be repaired.• Statistical distribution of properties.Statistical distribution of properties.• Test methods and compliance criteria.Test methods and compliance criteria.• Modelling of mechanical behavior.Modelling of mechanical behavior.• Design methods.Design methods.
Main issues for applicationMain issues for application
![Page 10: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
10
Composite structuresComposite structures
Mechanical compatibility with substrate.Mechanical compatibility with substrate.Material properties + RestraintMaterial properties + Restraint
![Page 11: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
11
TasksTasks
WP 14 is divided into 5 tasks, as WP 14 is divided into 5 tasks, as follows:follows:
• 14.1 Preliminary Study14.1 Preliminary Study• 14.2 Testing14.2 Testing• 14.3 Interpretation – modelling14.3 Interpretation – modelling• 14.4 Numerical parameter study14.4 Numerical parameter study• 14.5 Specifications – documents 14.5 Specifications – documents
for applicationfor application
![Page 12: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
12
MilestonesMilestones
Milestone M4:Milestone M4: Identification of most important Identification of most important phenomena for defining main test programme. phenomena for defining main test programme. Results of numerical simulations and preliminary Results of numerical simulations and preliminary tests available. Date due: Month 6tests available. Date due: Month 6
Milestone M12:Milestone M12: Selection of materials for main test Selection of materials for main test series of HPRFCC. Preliminary test results and series of HPRFCC. Preliminary test results and conclusion concerning materials for the main tests conclusion concerning materials for the main tests available. Date due: Month 12available. Date due: Month 12
Milestone M18:Milestone M18: Choice of on site applications for Choice of on site applications for pilot tests of HPFRCC. Results and interpretation of pilot tests of HPFRCC. Results and interpretation of main test series available. Date due: Month 21main test series available. Date due: Month 21
![Page 13: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
13
DeliverablesDeliverables
D13:D13: Report on preliminary studies for the use of HPFRCC for Report on preliminary studies for the use of HPFRCC for rehabilitation of road infrastructure componentsrehabilitation of road infrastructure components ((Mon.18Mon.18))
D18:D18: Test report on laboratory testing of UHPFRCTest report on laboratory testing of UHPFRC ( (Mon.24Mon.24))D22:D22: Test report on pilot field trials of UHPFRCTest report on pilot field trials of UHPFRC ( (Mon.30Mon.30))D 25: D 25: Specifications for the use of CI and UHPFRC (Specifications for the use of CI and UHPFRC (Month 33Month 33))D26:D26: Modelling of UHPFRC in hybrid structuresModelling of UHPFRC in hybrid structures ( (Mon.33Mon.33))D31: D31: Guidelines for the use of UHPFRC Guidelines for the use of UHPFRC WP 12 ( WP 12 (Mon. 36Mon. 36))
![Page 14: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
14
4. Progress at mid-term4. Progress at mid-term
![Page 15: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
15
5. State of the art Review5. State of the art Review
Relevant documents (scientific, technical, norms, guidelines, etc.) from following countries were taken into consideration:
• France, Switzerland, Belgium, Canada• Germany, Austria• United Kingdom, USA• Italy• Japan, China• Denmark, Sweden, Norway
![Page 16: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
16
b) Measurement of the air permeability
a) Air permeability of new layers on composite beams, Habel (2004)
6. Protective function6. Protective function
![Page 17: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
17
Serviceability of UHPFRCServiceability of UHPFRC
• Assess the Assess the influence of cracking on the influence of cracking on the permeabilitypermeability of a UHPFRC of a UHPFRC
• Suggest serviceability limit statesSuggest serviceability limit states for an for an UHPFRC according to exposure conditionsUHPFRC according to exposure conditions
• OptimiseOptimise composite UHPFRC-concrete composite UHPFRC-concrete structuresstructures
![Page 18: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
18
Experimental techniquesExperimental techniques
• Uniaxial tensile testUniaxial tensile test• Measurement basis : 100 mmMeasurement basis : 100 mm• Specimen unloaded after predefinedSpecimen unloaded after predefined
deformation is reacheddeformation is reached• Core of Core of = 100 mm extracted= 100 mm extracted
![Page 19: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
19
• Glycol permeability Glycol permeability testtest
• Source of variability: crack Source of variability: crack pattern and heterogeneitypattern and heterogeneity
Permeability of damaged Permeability of damaged UHPFRCUHPFRC
• Damage testDamage test
tt loadingloading = 0.25 %= 0.25 %• tt unloading unloading 0.13 % 0.13 %
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 0,05 0,1 0,15 0,2 0,25 0,3
Ten
sile
str
ess
(MP
a)
Deformation, t (%)
t unloading = 0.12 %
t unloading = 0.13 %
t unloading = 0.14 %
Measurement basis = 100 mm
![Page 20: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
20
Tensile limit states for Tensile limit states for permeabilitypermeability
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
21
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.50
125
250
375
500
625
750
875
Deformation,t (%)
Str
ess
in U
HP
FR
C (
MP
a)
UHPFRC
Stress in steel bars (M
Pa)
fy = 700 MPa
fy = 500 MPa
Water- tightness
Prejudicialcracking
Unprejudicialcracking
Localized crack in UHPFRC
Steel bar
Charron et al. (2004)
![Page 21: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
21
Structural applicationStructural application
• Hybrid beam made of NC and UHPFRCHybrid beam made of NC and UHPFRC
As,low = 1010 mm2
As,upp = 339 mm2
As,UHPFRC = 314 mm2
UHPFRC50
150
NC
300 [mm]
F FUHPFRC
NCDeflection
24001200 1200
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 4 8 12 16 20
Force [kN]
Rehabilitation with UHPFRCRehabilitation with NC
Deflection [mm]
Habel (2004)Charron (2004)
![Page 22: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
22
Structural application (…)Structural application (…)
• Load limitationsLoad limitations• Avoid high creep deformations, Avoid high creep deformations, cc < 0.5 f < 0.5 fcc
• Protect reinf. bars against corrosion, Protect reinf. bars against corrosion, ss limited [BAEL, limited [BAEL, 1999]1999]
Use NC specifications for UHPFRC :
• conservative design
• benefits provided by UHPFRC not optimal
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 4 8 12 16 20
Force [kN]
Rehabilitation with UHPFRCRehabilitation with NC
Deflection [mm]
Water- tightness
Prejudicialcracking
Unprejudicialcracking
c < 0.5*Fc
s <
24
0 M
Pa
s <
15
0 M
Pa
![Page 23: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
23
Structural application (…)Structural application (…)
• Load capacity limitationsLoad capacity limitations• Avoid high creep deformations, Avoid high creep deformations, cc < 0.5 F < 0.5 Fcc
• Protect reinf. bars against corrosion, Protect reinf. bars against corrosion, ss limited by limited by permeabilitypermeability
Use UHPFRC limits suggested in this study :
• design less conservative
• better use of UHPFRC potential
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 4 8 12 16 20
Force [kN]
Rehabilitation with UHPFRCRehabilitation with NC
Deflection [mm]
Water- tightness
Prejudicialcracking
Unprejudicialcracking
c < 0.5*Fc
s <
24
0 M
Pa
s <
15
0 M
Pa
s <
50
0 M
Pa
s <
30
0 M
Pa
![Page 24: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
24
b)
Flexural tests on composite beams with UHPFRC: a) without rebars, b) with rebars, Habel (2004).
a)
7. Structural response7. Structural response
NL: 10 cm
NL: 5 cm
![Page 25: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
25
Crack patterns at peak forcesCrack patterns at peak forces
UHPFRC without rebars UHPFRC with rebars (=2%)
Habel (2004)
![Page 26: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
26
Proposed geometries for Proposed geometries for rehabilitation - Habel, (2004)rehabilitation - Habel, (2004)
P: protection (hu=10 to 30 mm) PR: protection+ replacement of corroded rebars (hu=30 to 50 mm) R: protection + increase of load carrying capacity with rebars (hu>=50 mm)
![Page 27: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
27
8. Future works8. Future works
Structural response (ongoing)Structural response (ongoing)• Three types of composite members: walls, Three types of composite members: walls,
slabs and beams, to test the application of slabs and beams, to test the application of UHPFRC as protective or reinforcing layer.UHPFRC as protective or reinforcing layer.
• Three kinds of action effects: Effect of Three kinds of action effects: Effect of autogenous shrinkage at early age until 3 autogenous shrinkage at early age until 3 month, effect of sustained creep loads (3 to 9 month, effect of sustained creep loads (3 to 9 month), effect of fatigue loading (age: 3 month, month), effect of fatigue loading (age: 3 month, duration 1 month - 15 million cycles).duration 1 month - 15 million cycles).
• Main parameters: monolithic behaviour of the Main parameters: monolithic behaviour of the composite members and avoidance of composite members and avoidance of transverse cracking.transverse cracking.
![Page 28: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
28
Structural tests on composite Structural tests on composite beamsbeams
![Page 29: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
29
Structural tests on composite Structural tests on composite wallswalls
![Page 30: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
30
Structural tests on composite Structural tests on composite slabsslabs
![Page 31: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
31
• Application of UHPFRC for the Application of UHPFRC for the rehabilitation of the deck and curbs of a rehabilitation of the deck and curbs of a road bridge in Switzerland road bridge in Switzerland october october 2004.2004.
• Determination of the best surface Determination of the best surface treatment of UHPFRC at fresh test to treatment of UHPFRC at fresh test to guarantee adhesivity with bituminous guarantee adhesivity with bituminous concrete.concrete.
Pilot tests on sitePilot tests on site
![Page 32: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
32
Pilot tests on sitePilot tests on site
![Page 33: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
33
Sensitivity to a slopeSensitivity to a slope
Tolerance to 3 to 5 % slopes for current mixes
![Page 34: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
34
9. Expected benefits9. Expected benefits
«Targeted local hardening» of highway «Targeted local hardening» of highway structures, in most critical zones.structures, in most critical zones.
Simplification of the construction process.Simplification of the construction process. Reduction of the dead loads (superstructure Reduction of the dead loads (superstructure
and pavement).and pavement).
Increase of the performance of existing and Increase of the performance of existing and new structures (protection and reinforcement).new structures (protection and reinforcement).
Dramatic decrease of the number and severity Dramatic decrease of the number and severity of interventions during service life.of interventions during service life.
![Page 35: 6.07.2004Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 20041 WP 14 – High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites for Rehabilitation WP leader: Dr](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062422/56649efe5503460f94c12e1c/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
6.07.2004 Mid-term assessment London July 5-6 2004
35
10. References10. References
1. Charron, J.P., Denarié, E. & Brühwiler, E.: Permeability of UHPFRC under high stresses. Proceedings, RILEM Symposium, Advances in Concrete Through Science and Engineering, March 22-24, 12 p., Chicago, USA, 2004.
2. Habel K.: Structural behaviour of composite “UHPFRC-concrete” elements, Doctoral thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2004, to be published.
3. Rossi P., Development of new cement composite material for construction, Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovations and Developments In Concrete Materials And Construction,, University of Dundee, Ed. by R. K. Dhir, P. C.Hewlett, L. J. Csetenyi, pp 17-29, Dundee, Scotland, September, 2002.