6 th annual national workers compensation execusummit uncasville, ct february 2, 2009
DESCRIPTION
Mega-Trends Affecting the Workers Compensation Insurance Industry Challenges Amid the Economic Crisis. 6 th Annual National Workers Compensation ExecuSummit Uncasville, CT February 2, 2009. Robert P. Hartwig, Ph.D., CPCU, President - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Mega-Trends Affecting the Workers Compensation
Insurance IndustryChallenges Amid the
Economic Crisis
6th Annual National Workers Compensation ExecuSummitUncasville, CT
February 2, 2009
Robert P. Hartwig, Ph.D., CPCU, PresidentInsurance Information Institute 110 William Street New York, NY 10038
Tel: (212) 346-5520 Fax: (212) 732-1916 [email protected] www.iii.org
Presentation Outline• Economic Factors Affecting Exposure in WC
Economic Downturn and Inflation• Overall P/C Insurance Industry Performance Cycles
Profitability Underwriting Premium Growth Drivers Investment Performance
• Workers Comp Performance Review Underwriting performance Premium Drivers Frequency & Severity Trends Predictive Modeling and Workers Comp
• Mega-Trends/Emerging Issues Affecting Workers Comp The Aging Workforce The Obesity Epidemic Non-English Speaking Workers
• Other Trends & Concerns
Q&A
THE ECONOMIC STORM
What a Weakening Economy & Rising Unemployment Mean for
Workers Comp Insurers
3.7
%
0.8
% 1.6
% 2.5
% 3.6
%
3.1
%
2.9
%
0.1
%
4.8
%
4.8
%
0.9
%
2.8
%
-0.5
%
-3.3
%
-0.8
%
1.2
% 2.2
%
2.6
%
3.0
%
3.3
%
3.2
%
-3.8%
-0.2%
-5%
-4%
-3%
-2%
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
2
00
0
2
00
1
2
00
2
2
00
3
2
00
4
2
00
5
2
00
6
07
:1Q
07
:2Q
07
:3Q
07
:4Q
08
:1Q
08
:2Q
08
:3Q
08
:4Q
09
:1Q
09
:2Q
09
:3Q
09
:4Q
10
:1Q
10
:2Q
10
:3Q
10
:4Q
Real GDP Growth*
*Yellow bars are Estimates/Forecasts from Blue Chip Economic Indicators.Source: US Department of Commerce, Blue Economic Indicators 1/09; Insurance Information Institute.
Recession began in December 2007. Economic toll of credit crunch, housing
slump, labor market contraction is growing
The Q4:2008 decline was the steepest since the
Q1:1982 drop of 6.4%
Length of US Recessions,1929-Present*
43
13
811 10
810 11
16
6
16
8 8
14
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Aug.1929
May1937
Feb.1945
Nov.1948
July1953
Aug.1957
Apr.1960
Dec.1969
Nov.1973
Jan.1980
Jul.1981
Jul.1990
Mar.2001
Dec.2007
* As of February 2009Sources: National Bureau of Economic Research; Insurance Information Institute.
Current recession began in Dec. 2007 and is already the
longest since 1981. If it extends beyond April, it will become the longest recession since the Great Depression.
Months in Duration
p PreliminarySource: US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), National Bureau of Economic Research; NCCI Frequency and Severity Analysis
Workplace Injury Incidence RatesDeclined in Last 4 Economic Downturns
0
5
10
15
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007p
Inc
ide
nc
e R
ate
s p
er
10
0 F
TE
Wo
rke
rs(B
LS
)
0
1250
2500
3750
Cla
ims
pe
r 10
0,0
00
Wo
rke
rs(N
CC
I)
Recessions
Manufacturing Industry Injuries and Illnesses per 100 Full-Time Workers
Private Industry Injuries and Illnesses per 100 Full-Time WorkersNCCI Lost-Time Claims per 100,000 Workers
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
Ja
n-0
0
Ja
n-0
1
Ja
n-0
2
Ja
n-0
3
Ja
n-0
4
Ja
n-0
5
Ja
n-0
6
Ja
n-0
7
Ja
n-0
8
January 2000 through December 2008
Unemployment will likely peak above 8% or 9% during this cycle, impacting payroll
sensitive p/c and non-life exposures
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
Dec. 2008 unemployment jumped to 7.2%, exceeding the 6.3% peak
during the previous cycle
Unemployment Rate:On the Rise
Average unemployment rate 2000-07 was 5.0%
Previous Peak: 6.3% in June 2003
Trough: 4.4% in March 2007
Dec
-08
U.S. Unemployment Rate,(2007:Q1 to 2010:Q4F)*
4.5%
4.5% 4.6% 4.
8% 4.9%
5.4%
6.1%
6.9%
7.4%
7.9%
8.3% 8.4%
8.4%
8.3%
8.2%
8.0%
4.0%
4.5%
5.0%
5.5%
6.0%
6.5%
7.0%
7.5%
8.0%
8.5%
9.0%
07:Q1 07:Q2 07:Q3 07:Q4 08:Q1 08:Q2 08:Q3 08:Q4 09:Q1 09:Q2 09:Q3 09:Q4 10:Q1 10:Q2 10:Q3 10:Q4
* Blue bars are actual; Yellow bars are forecastsSources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (1/09); Insurance Info. Inst.
Rising unemployment will erode payrolls
and workers comp’s exposure base.
Unemployment is expected to peak above 8% in the
second half of 2009.
Monthly Change Employment*(Thousands)
-76 -83 -88 -67 -47-100
-67-127
-403 -423
-584-524
-700
-600
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
Jan-08 Feb-08 Mar-08 Apr-08 May-08 Jun-08 Jul-08 Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 Nov-08 Dec-08
Job losses in 2008 totaled 2.589 million, the highest since 1945 at WW II’s end; 11.1 million people are now defined as unemployed.
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm; Insurance Info. Institute
The Nov./Dec. 2008 losses were the largest since May 1980 loss of 431,000,
but less than the Dec. 1974 loss of 602,000
Years With Job Losses: 1939-2008*(Thousands)
-2,750-2,589
-2,128
-1,762
-1,512
-886 -857
-545 -540 -462 -450 -432 -378 -371 -297
-52
-3,000
-2,500
-2,000
-1,500
-1,000
-500
0
1945 2008 1982 2001 1949 1944 1991 1957 2002 1953 1970 1960 1974 1954 1958 1981
The US has seen net job losses in only 16 of the 70
years since 1939
Source: Insurance Information Institute research fromUS Bureau of Labor Statistics data: http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm.
2008’s job losses were exceeded only by 1945, at the conclusion of WW II
New Private Housing Starts,1990-2010F (Millions of Units)
2.07
1.80
1.36
0.93
0.72
0.95
1.48
1.35
1.46
1.29
1.20
1.01
1.19
1.47
1.62 1.64
1.57 1.60
1.71
1.85
1.96
0.70.80.91.01.11.21.31.41.51.61.71.81.92.02.1
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08E 09F 10F
Exposure growth forecast for HO insurers is dim for 2009 with some
improvement in 2010.
Impacts also for comml. insurers with construction risk exposure
New home starts plunged
34% from 2005-2007;
Drop through 2009 trough is 65% (est.)—a
net annual decline of 1.35 million
units
I.I.I. estimates that each incremental 100,000 decline in housing starts costs
home insurers $87.5 million in new exposure (gross premium). The net
exposure loss in 2009 vs. 2005 is estimated at about $1.2 billion.
Source: US Department of Commerce; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (1/09); Insurance Information Inst.
16.916.916.6
17.117.5
17.817.4
16.516.1
13.2
11.2
13.1
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07F 08E 09F 10F
Weakening economy, credit crunch are hurting auto sales; Gas prices less of a factor now.
New auto/light trick sales are expected to experience a net
drop of 5.7 million units annually by 2009 compared
with 2005, a decline of 20.7%
Impacts of falling auto sales will have a less pronounced effect on auto insurance exposure growth
than problems in the housing market will on home insurers
Auto/Light Truck Sales,1999-2010F (Millions of Units)
Source: US Department of Commerce; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (1/09); Insurance Information Inst.
Total Industrial Production,(2007:Q1 to 2010:Q4F)
1.5%
3.2% 3.6%
0.3% 0.4%
-3.4%
-8.9%-8.6%
-6.1%
-2.6%
2.9%3.3%3.8%3.7%
0.5%
2.0%
-10.0%
-8.0%
-6.0%
-4.0%
-2.0%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
07:Q
1
07:Q
2
07:Q
3
07:Q
4
08:Q
1
08:Q
2
08:Q
3
08:Q
4
09:Q
1
09:Q
2
09:Q
3
09:Q
4
10:Q
1
10:Q
2
10:Q
3
10:Q
4
Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (1/09); Insurance Info. Inst.
Industrial production began
to contract sharply during H2 2008 and
is expected to shrink through the
first half of 2009
Obama stimulus program is expected benefit impact industrial production and therefore
insurance exposure both directly and indirectly
Figures for H2:09 and 2010 revised
sharply upwards to reflect expected
impact of Obama stimulus program
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08*
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35
$40
$45Wage & SalaryDisbursementsWC NPW
*9-month data for 2008Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis; Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis at http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/WASCUR; I.I.I. Fact Books
Wage & Salary Disbursements (Payroll Base) vs. Workers Comp
Net Written Premiums
7/90-3/91
Shaded areas indicate recessions
3/01-11/01
Wage & Salary Disbursement (Private Employment) vs. WC NWP$ Billions $ Billions
12/07-?
Weakening wage and salary growth is
expected to cause a deceleration in workers comp
exposure growth
$214.5
$124.0
$77.7 $68.4$49.4
$26.8 $19.2
$0
$100
$200
$300
Public sectorjobs and vital
services
Help workershurt by theeconomy
Transportation,Infrastructure
Education Energy Lowerhealthcare
costs
Science,technology
U.S. $825B Economic Stimulus Package, By Category
Sources: House Appropriations Committee; Wall Street Journal, January 16, 2009
$ BillionsCommercial insurance lines that will benefit
from the Obama stimulus plan include
workers comp, commercial property,
commercial auto, surety, inland marine
and others
I.I.I. Estimate
Every 1 million jobs created or preserved will increase (or
preserve) as much as $1 billion in workers comp premium. Obama stimulus target is 3-4
million jobs.
5.2%
-0.9
%-7
.4%
-6.5
%-1
.5%
1.8%
4.3%
18.6
%20
.3%
5.8%
0.3%
-1.6
%-1
.0%
-1.8
%-1
.0%
3.1%
1.1%
0.8%
0.4%
0.6%
-0.4
%-0
.3%
1.6%
5.6%
13.7
%7.
7%1.
2%-2
.9% -0
.5%
-3.4
%-4
.9%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%7
87
98
08
18
28
38
48
58
68
78
88
99
09
19
29
39
49
59
69
79
89
90
00
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
8F
Rea
l N
WP
Gro
wth
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
Rea
l G
DP
Gro
wth
Real NWP Growth Real GDP
Real GDP Growth vs. Real P/C Premium Growth: Modest Association
P/C insurance industry’s growth is influenced modestly by growth
in the overall economy
Sources: A.M. Best, US Bureau of Economic Analysis, Blue Chip Economic Indicators, 8/08; Insurance Information Inst.
Total Private Employment* Grew by25½ Million Workers from 1991 to 2008
89.7
89.9 91
.7 94.9 97
.7 100.
1 103.
0 106.
0 108.
6
108.
8
108.
2
115.
4
115.
2
110.
9 114.
0
111.
8
111.
0
109.
8
80
90
100
110
120
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
*seasonally adjusted at mid-yearSource: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, at http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost
Millions
The US economy added 25.5 million jobs between 1991 and
2008, but job growth has recently stagnated, impacted payrolls and the workers comp exposure base
Average Weekly Real Earnings in Private Employment Were Flat from 1999 to 2008$2
59.2
$257
.9
$258
.3
$260
.1
$258
.0
$260
.7 $264
.3
$271
.5 $276
.1 $279
.4
$279
.3
$281
.2
$276
.1
$275
.1
$277
.3
$276
.9
$275
.0
$276
.0
$250
$260
$270
$280
$290
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; I.I.I.
(at mid-year) Constant 1982 dollars
Virtually all of the real wage growth occurred between 1995 and 1999 and has now stagnated
New Private Housing Starts,1990-2014F (Millions of Units)
2.07
1.80
1.36
0.97
0.97
1.38 1.
45
1.54 1.56
1.51
1.48
1.35
1.46
1.29
1.20
1.01
1.19
1.47
1.62 1.64
1.57 1.
60
1.71
1.85
1.96
0.91.01.11.21.31.41.51.61.71.81.92.02.1
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07F08F 09F 10F11F 12F 13F 14FSource: US Department of Commerce; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (10/07), except 2008/09 figures from 8/08 edition of BCEF; Insurance Info. Institute
Exposure growth forecast for HO insurers is dim for 2008/09
Impacts also for comml. insurers with construction risk exposure
New home starts plunged 34% from 2005-2007;
Drop through 2008 trough is 54% (est.)—a net annual decline of
1.11 million units
I.I.I. estimates that each incremental 100,000 decline in housing starts costs
home insurers $87.5 million in new exposure (gross premium). The net
exposure loss in 2008 vs. 2005 is estimated at $971 million.
Total Industrial Production,(2007:Q1 to 2009:Q4F)
1.5%
3.2%3.6%
0.3%
-0.3%
-2.7%
0.2%
1.1%1.7%
2.3%2.7% 2.8%
-4.0%
-3.0%
-2.0%
-1.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
07:Q1 07:Q2 07:Q3 07:Q4 08:Q1 08:Q2 08:Q3 08:Q4 09:Q1 09:Q2 09:Q3 09:Q4Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (7/08); Insurance Info. Inst.
Industrial production shrank during Q1 2008 and is expected to shrink again in Q2, growing very
slowly thereafter
Industrial production affects exposure both directly and indirectly
Medical & Tort Cost Inflation
Amplifiers of Inflation, Major Insurance Cost Driver
Consumer Price Index for Medical Care vs. All Items, 1960-2008
215.2
364.1
0
100
200
300
400
60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
Ind
ex V
alu
e (1
982-
84=
100)
All Items Medical Care
Source: Department of Labor (Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
(Base: 1982-84=100)
Inflation for Medical Care has been surging
ahead of general inflation (CPI) for 25
years. Since 1982-84, the cost of medical care has
more than tripled
Soaring medical inflation is among the most serious
long-term challenges facing
casualty, disability and LTC insurers
Tort Cost Growth & Medical Cost Inflation vs. Overall Inflation (CPI-U), 1961-2008*
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
1961-70 1971-80 1981-90 1991-2000 2001-08
Tort Costs Medical Costs CPI
*Medical cost and CPI-U from BLS. Tort figure is for full-year 2008 from Tillinghast.
Tort System is an Inflation Amplifier
Avg. Ann. Change: 1961-2008*
Torts Costs: +8.4%Med Costs: +6.0%
Overall Inflation: +4.2%
Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Tillinghast-Towers Perrin, 2007 Update on U.S. Tort Costs; Insurance Info. Inst.
Tort costs move with inflation but at twice the rate
Comparative 2008 Inflation Statistics Important to Insurers ( %)
3.8 3.7
2.71.8
4.0
7.4
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
CPI-U Core CPI* TotalMedical
Care
PhysicianServices
HospitalServices
LegalServices
Infl
atio
n R
ate
(%)
*Core CPI is the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) less food and energy costs.Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
CPI and “Core” CPI are not representative of
many of the costs insurers face Medical/Legal costs typically
run well ahead of inflation
P/C INSURANCE FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE
A Resilient Industry in Challenging Times
P/C Net Income After Taxes1991-2009F ($ Millions)*
$14,
178
$5,8
40
$19,
316
$10,
870
$20,
598
$24,
404 $3
6,81
9
$30,
773
$21,
865
$3,0
46
$30,
029
$61,
940
$5,4
21
-$6,970
$65,
777
$44,
155
$20,
559
$38,
501
-$10,000
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
08F
*ROE figures are GAAP; 1Return on avg. surplus. 2008 numbers are annualized based on 9-mos. Actual of $4.066 billion.Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Inst.
2001 ROE = -1.2%2002 ROE = 2.2%2003 ROE = 8.9%2004 ROE = 9.4%2005 ROE= 9.4%2006 ROE = 12.2%2007 ROAS1 = 12.3%2008 ROAS = 1.1%*
Insurer profits peaked in 2006.
29
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 06 08
1975: 2.4%
1977:19.0% 1987:17.3% 1997:11.6% 2006:12.2%
1984: 1.8% 1992: 4.5% 2001: -1.2%
10 Years10 Years
9 Years
Note: 2008 figure is actual 9-month result.Sources: ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
2008F: 1.1%
P/C Insurance Industry ROEs,1975 – 2008E*
30
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08*
ROE Cost of Capital
ROE vs. Equity Cost of Capital:US P/C Insurance:1991-2008:Q3
*Excludes mortgage and financial guarantee insurers.Source: The Geneva Association, Ins. Information Inst.
The p/c insurance industry fell well short of is cost of capital in 2008
-13.
2 p
ts
US P/C insurers missed their cost of capital by an average 6.7 points from 1991 to 2002, but on
target or better 2003-07
-1.7
pts
+2.
3 p
ts
-9.0
pts
The cost of capital is the rate of return
insurers need to attract and retain
capital to the business
-9.7
pts
31
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08F
Combined Ratios
1970s: 100.3
1980s: 109.2
1990s: 107.8
2000s: 102.0*
Sources: A.M. Best; ISO, III *A.M. Best year end estimate of 103.2; Actual 9-mos. result was 105.6.
P/C Insurance Combined Ratio, 1970-2008F*
32
115.8
107.5
100.198.4
100.8
92.6
101
103.3101.2
95.7
90
100
110
120
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2008* 2009F
P/C Insurance Industry Combined Ratio, 2001-2009E
*Includes Mortgage & Financial Guarantee insurers. Sources: A.M. Best.
Best combined ratio since 1949
(87.6)
As recently as 2001, insurers paid out nearly $1.16 for every
$1 in earned premiums
Relatively low CAT
losses, reserve releases
Including Mortgage
& Fin. Guarantee insurers
Cyclical Deterioration
33
2005 ratio benefited from heavy use of reinsurance which lowered net losses
110.
3
110.
2
107.
6
103.
9
109.
7
112.
3
111.
1
122.
3
110.
2
102.
5
105.
4
91.1
95.1
106.
5
105.
1
102.
0
112.
5
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08E 09F
2006/07 benefited from favorable loss cost trends, improved tort environment, low CAT
losses, WC reforms and reserve releases. Most of these trends reversed in 2008 and
mortgage and financial guarantee segments have big influence. 2009 is transition year.
Commercial coverages have exhibited significant
variability over time.
Commercial Lines Combined Ratio, 1993-2009F
Mortgage and financial guarantee may account for up to 4 points on the commercial
combined ratio in 2008
Sources: A.M. Best (historical and forecasts)
-55-50-45-40-35-30-25-20-15-10-505
101520253035
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
Source: A.M. Best, ISO; Insurance Information Institute * Includes mortgage & finl. guarantee insurers
$ B
illi
ons
Insurers earned a record underwriting profit of $31.7 billion in 2006, the largest ever but only the
second since 1978. Cumulative underwriting deficit from 1975 through 2007 is $422 billion.
Underwriting Gain (Loss)1975-2008:Q3*
$19.877 Bill underwriting loss in 08:9M incl. mort. & FG insurers
36
Number of Years With Underwriting Profits by Decade, 1920s –2000s
67
10
8
45
0 0
3
0
2
4
6
8
10
1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s*
Note: Data for 1920 – 1934 based on stock companies only.Sources: Insurance Information Institute research from A.M. Best Data. *2000 through 2008.
Number of Years with Underwriting ProfitsUnderwriting profits were common before the 1980s (40 of the 60 years
before 1980 had combined ratios below 100)—but then they vanished. Not a single underwriting profit was recorded in the 25 years from 1979
through 2003.
37
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
22%
24%
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute
Strength of Recent Hard Marketsby NWP Growth
1975-78 1984-87 2000-03Shaded areas denote “hard
market” periods
Net written premiums fell 1.0%
in 2007 (first decline since 1943)
and by 0.4% in 2008, the first back-
to-back decline since 1930-33
38
Year-to-Year Change in Net Written Premium, 2000-2008E*
*2008 figure is 9-month actual result from ISO.Source: A.M. Best (historical)
5.0%
8.4%
15.3%
10.0%
3.9%
0.5%
4.2%
-1.0% -0.4%2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008F
P/C insurers are experiencing their
slowest growth rates since 1930-33
Slow growth means retention is critical
Protracted period of
negative or slow growth is possible due to soft
markets and slow
economy
39
Distribution of P/C Insurance Industry’s Investment Portfolio
Cash & Short-Term Investments
7.2%
Common Stock17.9%
Bonds66.7%
Preferred Stock1.5%
Real Estate0.8%
Other5.9%
Portfolio Facts
•Invested assets totaled $1.3 trillion as of 12/31/07
•Insurers are generally conservatively invested, with 2/3 of assets invested in bonds as of 12/31/07
•Only about 18% of assets were invested in common stock as of 12/31/07
•Even the most conservative of portfolios was hit hard in 2008
Source: NAIC; Insurance Information Institute research;.
As of December 31, 2007
40
Property/Casualty Insurance Industry Investment Gain:1994- 2008:Q3 1
$ Billions
$35.4
$42.8$47.2
$52.3
$44.4
$36.0
$45.3$48.9
$59.4$55.7
$63.6
$28.3
$56.9$51.9
$57.9
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
1Investment gains consist primarily of interest, stock dividends and realized capital gains and losses. 2006 figure consists of $52.3B net investment income and $3.4B realized investment gain. *2005 figure includes special one-time dividend of $3.2B.Sources: ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
Investment gains are off sharply in 2008 due to lower yields and poor equity market conditions.
41
P/C Insurer Net Realized Capital Gains, 1990-2008:Q3
$2.88$4.81
$9.89
$1.66
$6.00
$9.24$10.81
$13.02
$16.21
$6.63
-$1.21
$6.61
$8.97
-$9.71
$18.02
$3.52
$9.70$9.13$9.82
-$10-$8-$6-$4-$2$0$2$4
$6$8
$10$12$14$16$18$20
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
08:Q
3
Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute.
Realized capital gains exceeded $9 billion in 2004/5 but fell sharply in
2006 despite a strong stock market. Nearly $9 billion again in 2007, but
$-9.7 billion in 2008 through Q3.
$ Billions
42
Workers Compensation
Review:
Underwriting andOperating Performance
102
97
111 110107
103
93
99100 101
107
115118
122
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007p
Percent
p Preliminary. Sources: Calendar Years 1994-2006, A.M. Best Aggregates & Averages; Calendar Year 2007p NCCIIncludes dividends to policyholders
Workers Comp Combined Ratios, (Calendar Year, Private Carriers) 1994-2007p
WC insurers lopped 30 points off the
combined ratio in just 5 years
Workers Comp Calendar Year vs. Ultimate Accident Year – Private Carriers
101
97
111
110
107
103
93
101 10
6
119
133
142
136
123
88
85 84
9210
1.5
99.0
100
101 10
7 115 11
8 122
97
105
96
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07E 08F
Calendar Year Accident Year
Percent
p Preliminary AY figure. Accident Year data is evaluated as of 12/31/2007 and developed to ultimateSource: Calendar Years 1994-2006, A.M. Best Aggregates & Averages; Calendar Year 2007p and Accident Years 1994-2007pbased on NCCI Annual Statement Analysis.
Includes dividends to policyholders *2008 figure from A.M. Best.
Workers Comp Combined Ratios, 1994-2008F*
A.M. Best expects 2008 combined ratio to rise by 2.5 points
$ Billions
Calendar Year
2
5
10
15
1820
21
18
15
12
9
42
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
2007 Tabular Discount Is $5.5 Billion
Considers all reserve discounts as deficienciesLoss and LAE figures are based on NAIC Annual Statement data for each valuation date and NCCI latest selectionsSource: NCCI analysis
Calendar Year Reserve Deficiencies Continue to Decline
WC Loss and LAE Reserve Deficiency: Private Carriers
Workers CompCost Drivers
Medical/Indemnity Frequency & Severity
Trends
Workers Compensation Medical Claim Trends
$8.4 $8.5 $8.3$9.1 $9.5
$10.3$11.3
$12.2$13.5
$14.5
$16.5$17.7
$19.0$20.2
$22.1
$24.0$25.4
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07p
Annual Change 1991–1993: +1.9%Annual Change 1994–2001: +8.9%Annual Change 2002-2006: +7.8%
Accident Year
MedicalClaim Cost ($000s)
2007p: Preliminary based on data valued as of 12/31/20071991-2006: Based on data through 12/31/2006, developed to ultimateBased on the states where NCCI provides ratemaking services; Excludes the effects of deductible policies
Workers Comp Medical Claims Costs Continue to Climb
Cumulative Change = +200%(1993-2007p)
4.5%3.5%
2.8% 3.2% 3.5%4.1%
4.6% 4.7%4.0% 4.4% 4.2% 4.0% 4.4%
5.1%
7.4%
10.1%
8.3%
10.6%
7.3%
13.6%
7.6% 7.2%6.2%
9.2%8.6%
6.0%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007p
Change in Medical CPIChange Med Cost per Lost Time Claim
WC Medical Severity Rising at Double the Medical CPI Rate
Sources: Med CPI from US Bureau of Labor Statistics, WC med severity from NCCI based on NCCI states.
Average annual increase in WC medical severity from
1995 through 2007 was more than twice the medical CPI
rate (8.2% vs. 4.0%)
Med Costs Share of Total Costs is Increasing Steadily
Indemnity54%
Medical46%
Source: NCCI (based on states where NCCI provides ratemaking services).
Indemnity47% Medical
53%
Indemnity41%
Medical59%1987
1997
2007p
WC Med Cost Will Equal 70% of Total by 2017 if Trends Hold
Source: Insurance Information Institute.
Indemnity30%
Medical70%
2017 Estimate
This trend will likely be supported
by the increased labor force
participation of workers age 55 and
older.
Indemnity Claim Cost Trends
$9
.9
$9
.6
$9
.4
$9
.8
$1
0.0
$1
0.6
$1
1.4
$1
2.4
$1
3.7
$1
5.0
$1
6.4
$1
6.8
$1
7.5
$1
9.8
$1
9.1
$1
7.7
$1
8.2
+4.0%
+1.0%-3.1%-2.8%+4.9%+1.7%+5.9%
+7.7%+9.0%
+10.1%
+10.1%
+8.9%+2.3%+4.5%+1.1%+2.7%
+5.0%
5
7
9
11
13
15
17
19
21
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007p
IndemnityClaim Cost ($ 000s)
Annual Change 1991–1993: -1.7%Annual Change 1994–2001: +7.3%Annual Change 2002–2006: +3.1%
2007p: Preliminary based on data valued as of 12/31/20071991–2006: Based on data through 12/31/2006, developed to ultimateBased on the states where NCCI provides ratemaking servicesExcludes the effects of deductible policies
Workers Compensation IndemnityClaim Costs Growth Is Moderate
Lost-Time Claims
Accident Year
3.0%
4.3%5.0%
4.4%5.2%
4.4%
2.4%2.0%
2.4%2.8%
3.4% 3.3%
5.9%
7.7%
9.0%
10.1%
4.8%
1.9%
3.0%
5.5%
4.0%
3.0% 2.4%
9.7%10.9%
1.7%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007p
Change in CPS Wage Change in Indemnity Cost per Lost-Time Claim
WC Indemnity Severity vs. Wage Inflation
2006p: Preliminary based on data valued as of 12/31/2006; 1991-2005: Based on data through 12/31/2005, developed to ultimate. Based on the states where NCCI provides ratemaking services. Excludes the effects of deductible policies. CPS = Current Population Survey.Source: NCCI
WC indemnity severity is once again outpacing
wage inflation
Residual Market Overview
-945
-1,396
-2,087
-1,714
-1,222
-581
-143-16 -57 -47 -67 -125-106
110281
-114-155-85 -115-124
-1,807-1,906
-2,500
-2,000
-1,500
-1,000
-500
0
500
$ Millions
Policy Year
Workers Compensation ResidualMarket Underwriting Results
NCCI-Serviced Workers Compensation Residual Market Poolsas of December 31, 2007
* Incomplete Policy Year Projected to UltimateSource: NCCI
Investment Performance
13.0
18.116.7
14.4
16.817.6
20.421.3
20.519.5
10.7 10.411.2
14.0 14.012
10.010.9
0
5
10
15
20
25
1990*1991* 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 20062007p
Workers Compensation InvestmentReturns Remain Below Historical Average
Investment Gain on Insurance Transactions-to-Premium RatioPrivate CarriersPercent
p Preliminary* Adjusted to include realized capital gains to be consistent with 1992 and after Investment Gain on Insurance Transactions includes Other IncomeSource: 1990–2006, Best's Aggregates & Averages; 2007p, NCCI
Calendar Year
Average (1990–2006): 15.3%
Premium Growth &Pricing Environment
31.0 31.3 29.8 30.5 29.126.3 25.2 24.2 23.3 22.3
25.0 26.129.2 31.1
34.737.637.8 38.7
31.0 31.329.8 30.5
29.126.3
28.226.9 25.8 24.9
28.4
31.9
37.3
41.8
45.944.0
47.2 46.3
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 20062007p
State Funds ($ B)Private Carriers ($ B)
Total Workers Compensation Premium Declined Again in 2007
Net Written Premium
Calendar Year
$ Billions
p Preliminary
Source: 1990–2006 Private Carriers, A.M. Best Aggregates & Averages; 2007p, NCCI 1996–2007p State Funds: AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, KY, LA, MO, MT, NM, OR, RI, TX, UT Annual Statements State Funds available for 1996 and subsequent
* States approved through 4/11/2008Countrywide approved changes in advisory rates, loss costs and assigned risk rates as filed by the applicable rating organization
History of Average WC Bureau Rate/Loss Cost Level Changes
12.1
7.4
10.0
2.9 3.5
1.2
4.9
6.6
-7.2
-2.7
-6.0
-2.6
-5.4
-8.0
-6.0
-3.2
-6.4-5.1
-5.7
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007* 2008*
Cumulative1990-1993
+36.3%
Cumulative 1994-1999
-27.8%
Percent
Cumulative 2000-2003
+17.1%
Cumulative 2004-2008
-24.0%
Calendar Year
States filed through 4/18/2008Source: NCCI
Current NCCI Voluntary MarketFiled Rate/Loss Cost Changes
Excludes Law-Only FilingsPercent
-19
.3
-18
.4
-10
.9
-10
.1 -8.8
-8.2
-7.6 -6
.1 -4.9 -3
.7 -2.8
-2.3
-2.2
-1.7 -0
.3
-0.2
3.4 4.0 4.1 5
.6 7.2
-10
.5 -9.5 -8.6 -7
.2 -4.7
-4.2
-4.0 -1
.2 -0.4
1.6 2.5 3.2
-12
.8
-6.3
-1.8
23
.7
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
HI FL AR AK NV MO AL CO LA UT DC TN RI KY NM MS VT NE ID NH OR ME MT MD WVSD IA IN NC VA GA CT IL AZ KS OK SC
Effective Dates 1/1/08 and Prior Effective Dates Subsequent to 1/1/08 Filed and Pending
Alternative Risk Transfer MarketSaps Traditional WC Carriers
Automobile, 12%
Property, 10%Workers Comp,
43%
Liability (excl. Auto), 35%
Source: MarketStance.
Workers Comp account for the
largest share of the alternative market,
particularly captives
$ Billions
FREQUENCY & SEVERITY TRENDS
Injury & Fatality Incidence Rates and Claim Cost
Trends
Rate of Work-Related Injuries Decreases Over Time Due to Improved Working Conditions
Rate of Injury per 100 FTE Workers
0
5
10
15
20
25
Private Industry Injuries and Illnesses per 100 Full-Time WorkersManufacturing Industry Injuries and Illnesses per 100 Full-Time Workers
Source: US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics; NCCI
Lost-Time Claims
-4.2 -4.4
-6.9
-4.5 -4.1 -3.9
-6.7
-2.5
-9.2
0.3
-6.5
-4.5
0.5
-3.9
-2.3
-4.5
-6.6
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07p
Cumulative Change of –53.3%since 1991 means that lost work
time claims have been cut by more than half
Accident Year
Percent Change
Workers Comp Lost-Time Claim Frequency Down More than 50% Since 1991
2007p: Preliminary based on data valued as of 12/31/20061991-2006: Based on data through 12/31/2005, developed to ultimateBased on the states where NCCI provides ratemaking servicesExcludes the effects of deductible policiesSource: NCCI
1997
1997
2006
2006
1997
1997
1997
2006
2006
2006
-36%-25% 4% -27% -40%
0.0000
0.0002
0.0004
0.0006
0.0008
0.0010
0.0012
Fatal Permanent Total Permanent Partial Temporary Total Lost-Time
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
All NCCI states except NV and TXSource: NCCI Unit Statistical Plan data, First Report
1997-2006: Claim Frequency Declined for All Injury Types Other Than Permanent Total
Percentage Change Between Policies Expiring in 1997 and 2006Claim Frequency per $1M of Wage-Adjusted Payroll
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2006
2006
2006
20062006
-18%-20%-19%-14% -14%
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
Manufacturing Contracting Office & Clerical Goods & Services Miscellaneous
Lost-Time Claim FrequencyDeclined for All Industry Groups
Percentage Change Between Policies Expiring in 2002 and 2006Claim Frequency per $1M of Wage-Adjusted Payroll
All NCCI states except NV and TXSource: NCCI Unit Statistical Plan data, First ReportSource: NCCI
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
40%30% 20% -8% 12%
0.0000
0.0005
0.0010
0.0015
0.0020
0.0025
0.0030
Manufacturing Contracting Office & Clerical Goods & Services Miscellaneous
Permanent Total ClaimFrequency by Industry Group
Percentage Change Between Policies Expiring in 2002 and 2006Claim Frequency per $1M of Wage Adjusted Payroll
All NCCI states except NV and TXSource: NCCI Unit Statistical Plan data, First ReportSource: NCCI
WHY YOU SHOULD FEEL GOOD ABOUT
WHAT YOU DO Saving Lives, Increasing
Productivity and Much More
It’s Not Just About the Money
Did You Know That When You Prevent a Workplace Injury You…
• Keeping Workers Comp Costs Down is Just the Beginning• You Help Companies Remain Productive1
Permanently Disabling Injuries 565 Lost Future Work Days on Avg. Fatal Injuries 5,850 Lost Future Work Days on Average
• You Increase/Preserve Worker Incomes Seriously Injured Workers Have Lower Lifetime Earnings, on Average Reduced Likelihood of Filing Bankruptcy Less Likely to Need Public Assistance
• You Maintain/Improve the Quality of Worker’s Home Life Higher Incidence of Divorce, Substance Abuse, Depression Among Seriously
Injured
ALL REASONS TO BE PROUD OF WHAT YOU DO!!
1 US Census Bureau: http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/tables/07s0639.xls
Lost-Time Claims
-4.2 -4.4
-6.9
-4.5 -4.1 -3.9
-6.7
-2.5
-9.2
0.3
-6.5
-4.5
0.5
-3.9
-2.3
-4.5
-6.6
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07p
Cumulative Change of –53.3%since 1991 means that lost work
time claims have been cut by more than half
Accident Year
Percent Change
Workers Comp Lost-Time Claim Frequency Down More than 50% Since 1991
2007p: Preliminary based on data valued as of 12/31/20061991-2006: Based on data through 12/31/2005, developed to ultimateBased on the states where NCCI provides ratemaking servicesExcludes the effects of deductible policiesSource: NCCI
Number of Fatal Work Injuries is Continues to Fall, 1992 – 2007p
5,48
8
6,05
56,23
8
6,20
2
6,27
5
6,63
2
6,33
1
6,21
7
6,05
4
5,92
0
5,91
5
5,53
4
5,57
5 5,76
4
5,73
4
5,84
0
5,000
5,200
5,400
5,600
5,800
6,000
6,200
6,400
6,600
6,800
92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01* 02 03 04 05 06 07pSource: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor; III. *Excludes 9/11 deaths.
Workers comp insurers & the entire workplace safety
community have contributed to the 17% decline in workplace
fatalities since 1994
Lives Saved Due to Reduction inFatal Work Injury Rate, 1995–2006
1,8981,717
1,6231,7581,757
357
585 610
833
1,0771,210
1,382
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06Source: Insurance Information Institute from BLS data.
Workers comp insurers are a major force in saving worker lives
Reduction in Occupational Deaths Due to Fall in Fatality Rate from 5.3 per 100,000 Workers in 1994 to 4.0 in 2006
Nearly 2,000 work lives are saved annually due to
improved workplace safety!
Cumulative Lives Saved Due toReduction in Fatal Work Injury Rate
357 9421,552
2,3853,463
4,6736,055
7,811
9,569
11,192
12,909
14,807
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06Source: Insurance Information Institute from BLS data.
Saving a Life, Saves a Family
Cumulative Lives Saved Due to Fall in Fatality Rate from 5.3 per 100,000 Workers in 1994 to 4.0 in 2006
Since 1994, nearly 15,000 worker lives have been saved due to improved
workplace safety!
EMERGING TRENDS & CHALLENGES IN WORKERS COMP
#1Emerging (Mega) Trend
The Obesity Epidemic
WC Medical Claims Costs are 6.8x Higher for the Most Obese Workers
$7,1
09
$13,
338
$19,
661
$3,9
24
$5,3
96 $13,
569
$34,
293
$7,5
03
$51,
091
$23,
373
$23,
633
$59,
178
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
BMI <18.5(Underweight)
18.5-24.9(Healthy Weight)
25-29.9(Overweight)
30-34.9 (ObeseClass I)
35-39.9 (ObeseClass II)
40+ (ObeseClass II)
Medical Claims Costs Indemnity Claims Costs
Source: Ostbye, T., et al, “Obesity and Workers Compensation,” Archives of Internal Medicine, April 23, 2007.
Indemnity costs are 11 times higher for the most obese workers than for healthy-
weight workers.
Some people with high BMI also have other characteristics that contribute to disability and/or death. They… Smoke and/or regularly drink alcohol heavily
Are older and/or male
Have chronic diseases (e.g., diabetes, heart disease)
Have other conditions/circumstances (e.g., no health
insurance, don’t exercise) that are related to poor health
Failure to adjust for these “confounding factors” likely results in overstating the effect of obesity.
It’s Not All Because of Obesity: “Confounding Factors”
Source: Flegal, Graubard, Williamson, and Gail, “Excess Deaths Associated with Underweight, Overweight, and Obesity,” JAMA Vol. 293, No. 15 (April 20, 2005) pp. 1861-1867.
#2Emerging (Mega)Trend
The Aging Workforce
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2004.
40.5
39.0
35.8
34.335.2
36.6
38.0
39.440.6 40.7
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
1962 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2008Year
U.S. Workforce is Aging: Significant Implications for Workers Comp
Median Age of U.S. Worker
The median age of US workers as the Baby Boomer begin to retire is about 41 years. Immigration will hold this
number down and may even lower the figure.
Older and less healthy workforce
Fatal Work Injury RatesClimb Sharply With Age
5.04.2
3.73.32.72.8
0.9
11.2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
16-17 18-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor; Insurance Information Institute.
The fatality rate for workers 65 and older is triple that of workers age 35-44. The workplace of the future will have to be completely redesigned to accommodate
the surge in older workers.
Fatal Work Injuries per 100,000 Workers (2006)
Older Workers Have More Lost Time from Work Due to Injury or Illness
1211
10
8
6
44
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor
There will be more lost time as the
workforce ages in the future.
Median Days Away From Work (2005)
Age 65+ workers median lost time is 50% greater than workers age 35-44
Percentage of Non-Commissioned Officers Suffering from Symptoms of PTSD by Number of Deployments…
12.0%
18.5%
27.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
% Suffering from PTSD
First Deployment
Second Deployment
Third or Fourth Deployment
Symptoms of PTSD are 54% more likely to be
observed in second deployments and 125% higher in third or fourth
deployments
Source: Brookings Institution, Iraq Index Archive, updated August 18, 2008.
#3Emerging (Mega) Trend
Non-EnglishSpeaking Workers
Fatal Worker Injury Rates byRace and Ethnicity, 2006
4.03.7
5.0
0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
White Black or AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
Source: U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries, 2006
Hispanic workers experience highest rate of fatal injuries on the job
Fatality Rate per 100,000 Workers Employed
Insurance Information Institute On-Line
If you would like a copy of this presentation, please give me your business card with e-mail address