6. daftar pustaka - repository.unika.ac.idrepository.unika.ac.id/1259/7/07.70.0144 dominicus...

40

6. DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Adawyah, R. (2007). Pengolahan dan Pengawetan Ikan. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta Aitken, A; I.M. Mackie; J.H. Merrit dan M.L. Windsor. (1982). Fish Handling and

Processing. Crown. Edinburgh. Anonim (2009). The Shelf Life of Vacuum Packed and Non-Vacuum Packed Food.

Sumber www.lava-vacuum-packing.com. Didownload tanggal: 6 September 2012

Apriyantono, A, D. Fardiaz, N.L. Puspitasari, Sedarnawati dan Budiyanto. (1989).

Petunjuk Laboratorium Analisa. Pangan dan Gizi. IPB Arambewela, L., Arawwawala M., and Rajapaksa, D. (2006). Piper Betel : a Potential

Natural Antioxidant. International Journal of Food Science Vol 41 (Suplement 1): 10-14

Ariyani, F. J.T.Murtini dan T.H. Siregar. (2010). Penggunaan Ekstrak Daun Jambu Biji

(Psidium guajava) sebagai Pengawet Pindang Tongkol. Jurnal Pascapanen dan Bioteknologi Kelautan dan Perikanan Vol 5 (1): 29-42

Association of Official Analytical Chemists. (1990). Official Method of Analysis

Volume One 15th Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemist Inc. Arlington, Virginia USA.

Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Republik Indonesia. (2009). Penetapan Batas

Maksimum Cemaran Mikroba dan Kimia dalam Makanan. Percetakan Negara. Jakarta

Bennion, M and O. Hughes. (1975). Introductory Foods 6th ed. Macmillan Publishing

Company, Inc. USA Caballero, M.E, Lopez, M, Perez-Mateos, J.A, Borderiaz and Montero, P. (2000).

Extension of The Shelf Life of Prawns (Panaeus japonicas) by Vacuum Packaging and High-Pressure Treatment. Journal of Food Protection Vol 63 (10): 1381-1388

deMan, J.M. (1997). Food Chemistry (Terjemahan: Kimia Makanan, diterjemahkan K.

Padmawinata). Edisi kedua. Penerbit ITB. Bandung Direktorat Jenderal Perikanan. 1979. Buku Pedoman Pengenalan Sumberdaya

Perikanan Laut Bagian 1: Jenis-jenis Ikan Ekonomis Penting. Direktorat Jenderal Perikanan. Departemen Pertanian.

Fardiaz, S. (1992). Mikrobiologi Pangan 1. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta

http://www.lava-vacuum-packing.com/

41

Fellows, P. (2000). Food Processing Technology : Principles and Practises 2nd edition. Woodhead Publishing Limited. Cambridge.

Fitzgerald, M, D.B. Papkovsky, M. Smiddy, J.P. Kerry, C.K. O’Sullivan, D.J. Buckley

and G.G. Guilbault. (2001). Non-Destructive Monitoring of Oxygen Profiles in Packaged Food Using Phase-Fluorimetric Oxygen Sensor. Journal of Food Science Vol 66 (1): 105-110

Flick, G. Jr. (2003). Novel Applications of High Pressure Processing. Global

Aquaculture Advocate Vol.6, Issue 3 Frazier, W.C and D.C. Westhoff. (1988). Food Microbiology 4th Edition. McGraw-Hill

Book Co. Singapore Hadiwiyoto, S. (1995). Hubungan Keadaan Kimiawi dm Mikrobiologik Ikan Pindang

Naya Pada Penyimpanan Suhu Kamar Dengan Sifat Organoleptiknya. Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta.

Hall, G.M. (1997). Fish Processing Technology 2nd ed. Blackie Academy and

Professional. Glasgow Handayani, N.M.S, A.A.S. Dewi, N. Riti dan I.G.P.S. Ardana. (2004) Cemaran

Mikroba dan Residu Antibiotika Pada Produk Asal Hewan di Provinsi Bali, NTB dan NTT Tahun 2003-2004. Sumber http://bppv-dps.info. Didownload tanggal 6 September 2012.

Herschdoefer, S.M. (1986). Quality Control in the Food Industry 2nd ed. Vol. 2.

Academic Press, Inc. London. Howgate, P. (2010). A Critical Review of Total-Volatile-Bases and Trimethylamine as

Indices of Freshness of Fish. Part 2: Formation of the Bases and Application in Quality Assurance. Electronic Journal of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Chemistry Vol 9(1): 58-88

Ilyas, S. (1983). Teknologi Refrigasi Hasil Perikanan: Teknik Pendinginan Ikan Jilid 1.

CV Paripurna. Jakarta Jenie, B.S.L, Nuratifa dan Suliantari. (2001). Peningkatan Keamanan dan Mutu Simpan

Pindang Ikan Kembung (Rastrelliger sp) dengan Aplikasi Kombinasi Natrium Asetat, Bakteri Asam Laktat dan Pengemasan Vakum. Jurnal Teknologi dan Industri Pangan Vol XII (1) : 21-27

Julianti, E dan M. Nurminah. (2006). Teknologi Pengemasan. Departemen Teknologi

Pertanian Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Sumatera Utara. Juneja, V.K and J.N. Sofos. (2002). Control of Foodborne Microorganism. Marcel

Dekker Inc. New York

http://bppv-dps.info/

42

Kadoya, T. (1990). Food Packaging. Academic Press Inc. San Diego, California Kerr, M. Lawicki, P. Aguirre, S. and Rayner, C. (2002). Effect of Storage Conditions on

Histamine Formation in Fresh and Canned Tuna. State Chemitry Laboratory, Werrbee. Victorian Government Departement of Human Services. www.foodsafety.vic.gov.au

Komariah, I.I. Arief dan Y. Wiguna. (2004). Kualitas Fisik dan Mikroba Daging Sapi

yang Ditambah Jahe (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) pada Konsentrasi dan Lama Penyimpanan yang Berbeda. Media Peternakan ed. Agustus Vol 27 (2) : 46-54

Lin, K.W and Lin, S.N. (2002). Physicochemical Properties and Microbial Stability of

Reduced-Fat Chinese-Style Sausage Stored Under Modified Atmosphere Systems. Journal of Food Science Vol 67 (8): 3184-3189

Marwati, T, Ch. Winarti dan D. Sumangat. (1996). Aktivitas Zat Antibakteri pada

Rimpang Kunyit. Prosiding Simpusium Nasional: Tumbuhan Obat dan Aromatik APIMAP: 37-43

Moeljanto. (1992). Pengawetan dan Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan. Penebar Swadaya.

Jakarta Oonmetta-aree, J., T.Suzuki, P.Gasaluck and G.Eumkeb. (2006) Antimicrobial

Properties and Action of Galangal (Alpina galangal Linn.) on Staphylococcus aureus. www.elsevier.com/locate/lwt LWT 39 (2006): 1214-1220

Pandit, G.S, Mangku, G.P dan Suparwata, N.B. (1997). Penggunaan Jenis Bahan

Pengemas dan Lama Penyimpanan terhadap Stabilitas Mutu Ikan Tongkol. Prosiding Seminar Teknologi Pangan 1997: 487-495

_____, Suryadhi, N.T, Arka, I.B dan Adiputra, N. (2011). Pengaruh Penyiangan dan

Suhu Penyimpanan terhadap Mutu Kimiawi, Mikrobiologis dan Organoleptik Ikan Tongkol (Auxis thazard, Lac). Sumber http: //ejournal.unud.ac.id/ abstrak/ e-journal_suranaya_pandit.doc. Didownload tanggal: 6 September 2012

Potter, N.N. and H.J. Hotchkiss. (1996). Food Science 5th Edition. CBB Publisher. New

Delhi. Purwani, E dan Muwakhidah. (2008). Efek Berbagai Pengawet Alami Sebagai

Pengganti Formalin terhadap Sifat Orgaanoleptik dan Masa Simpan Daging dan Ikan. Jurnal Penelitian Sains & Teknologi Vol 9(1): 1-4

_________, S.Wulang.N.H dan R.Rauf. (2009). Respon Hambatan Bakteri Gram Positif

dan Negatif pada Ikan Nila (Oreochromis niloticus) yang Diawetkan dengan Ekstrak Jahe (Zingiber officinale). Jurnal Kesehatan ISSN 1979-7621 Vol 2(1): 61-70

http://www.foodsafety.vic.gov.au/

http://ejournal.unud.ac.id/abstrak/e_journal_suranaya_pandit.doc

http://ejournal.unud.ac.id/abstrak/e_journal_suranaya_pandit.doc

43

_________, E. Retnaningtyas dan D. Widowati. (2012). Pengembangan Model Pengawet Alami dari Ekstrak Lengkuas (Languas galaga) Kunyit (Curcuma domestica) dan Jahe (Zingiber officinale) sebagai Pengganti Formalin pada Daging Segar. Makalah Seminar Nasional IX Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS 7 Juli 2012

Puspitasari, Y.F. (2009). Cara Pemindangan dan Kadar Protein Ikan Tomgkol (Auxis

thazard) di Kabupaten Rembang. Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiah Surakarta (Skripsi)

Rosenthal, A.J. (1999). Food Texture Measurement & Perception. Aspen Publisher, Inc.

Maryland. Setyabudi, D.A dan W. Broto. (2008). Kemasan Plastik Telah Menggeser Kemasan

Tradisional.http://pascapanen.litbang.deptan.go.id/index.php/berita/55 didownload tanggal: 6 September 2012.

Shahidi, Fereidoon and J.R. Botta. (1994). Seafoods: Chemistry, Processing Technology

and Quality. Blackie Academy and Professional. Glasgow. Standar Nasional Indonesia. (2006). Penentuan Angka Lempeng Total (ALT) pada

Produk Perikanan. SNI 01-2332.3-2006 Syarief, R. dan H. Halid. (1991). Teknologi Pengolahan Pangan. Arcan.Jakarta Widyasari, R.A.H.E. (2006). Pengaruh Pengawetan menggunakan Biji Picung

(Pangium edule Reinw) Terhadap Kesegaran dan Keamanan Ikan Kembung Segar (Rastrelliger brachysoma). Sekolah Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor (Thesis)

Winarno, F.G; S. Fardiaz dan F.Dedi. (1984). Pengantar Teknologi Pertanian.

PT.Gramedia. Jakarta. Welt, B.A; D.S. Sage and K.L. Berger. (2003). Performance Spesification of Time-

Temperaature Integrators Designed to Protect Against Botulism in Refrigerated Fresh Food. Journal of Food Science Vol 68(1): 2-9

Zheng, X; Y. Lan; C. Liu; N. Ding and T. Zhao. (2009) Effect of Rice Fissure on Taste

Quality of Cooked Rice. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal. Vol XI: Manuscript 1190

http://pascapanen.litbang.deptan.go.id/index.php/berita/55

44

7. LAMPIRAN Lampiran 1. Pindang Ikan Tongkol pada Perlakuan Garam dan Ekstrak Rempah

47

Lampiran 2. Pengamatan Total Plate Count Pindang Ikan Tongkol

51

Lampiran 3. Hasil Analisa Data (Output SPSS)

Oneway Post Hoc Tests Homogeneous Subsets Air_0 Duncan

Treatment N

Subset for alpha = .05

1 2 3 4

Lengkuas 6 66.2617

Kluwak 6 66.7400

Lengkuas UV 6 66.7433

Kluwak UV 6 67.2200 67.2200

Garam UV 6 67.7950 67.7950

Kunyit UV 6 68.1550 68.1550 68.1550

Jahe 6 68.2100 68.2100 68.2100

Kunyit 6 68.7050 68.7050

Garam 6 68.9483

Jahe UV 6 68.9533

Sig. .068 .059 .083 .138

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000. T_Air_0 Duncan

Treatment N


1 2 3

Lengkuas 6 66.3333

Kluwak 6 66.6667


Kluwak UV 6 67.1667 67.1667

Garam UV 6 68.0000 68.0000

Jahe 6 68.1667 68.1667

Kunyit UV 6 68.1667 68.1667

Kunyit 6 68.6667

Garam 6 69.0000

Jahe UV 6 69.0000

Sig. .115 .058 .069

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.

52

TVN_0 Duncan

Treatment N


1 2 3 4

Garam UV 6 165.54550

Garam 6 165.66950

Kunyit 6 168.20900

Jahe 6 168.29200

Jahe UV 6 168.35533

Kunyit UV 6 169.26100

Lengkuas 6 177.00517


Kluwak 6 180.52933

Kluwak UV 6 180.58317

Sig. .813 .071 .892 .918

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000. TMA_0 Duncan

Treatment N


1 2

Jahe 6 22.19917

Jahe UV 6 22.20650

Lengkuas 6 22.49950

Kluwak 6 22.50450


Kluwak UV 6 22.50950

Kunyit UV 6 24.12850

Kunyit 6 24.13483

Garam UV 6 24.76767

Garam 6 24.78133

Sig. .593 .241


53

Hard_0

Duncan

Treatment N


1 2 3 4

Jahe 6 874.15083

Jahe UV 6 874.15083

Lengkuas 6 884.96967


Kluwak 6 932.98733

Kluwak UV 6 932.98733

Kunyit 6

1047.99467

Kunyit UV 6

1047.99467

Garam 6

1143.52017

Garam UV 6

1143.52017

Sig. .070 1.000 1.000 1.000

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000. Spring_0 Duncan

Treatment N


1 2 3 4

Lengkuas 6 2.51550


Kunyit 6 2.55667

Kunyit UV 6 2.55667

Kluwak 6 3.02500

Kluwak UV 6 3.02500

Jahe 6 3.32717

Jahe UV 6 3.32717

Garam 6 3.77483

Garam UV 6 3.77483

Sig. .784 1.000 1.000 1.000


54

TPC_0 Duncan

Treatment N


1 2 3

Jahe UV 6 5.45017

Jahe 6 5.45033

Lengkuas 6 5.47600


Kunyit 6 5.70717

Kunyit UV 6 5.70717

Garam UV 6 5.72283

Garam 6 5.74517

Kluwak 6 6.45017

Kluwak UV 6 6.45017

Sig. .640 .491 1.000

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000. Air_3 Duncan

Treatment N


1 2 3 4 5

Kluwak 6 65.5533

Lengkuas 6 66.2300 66.2300

Kunyit 6 66.7483 66.7483 66.7483

Jahe 6 66.8883 66.8883 66.8883

Garam UV 6 67.6783 67.6783 67.6783

Garam 6 67.9250 67.9250 67.9250

Kluwak UV 6 68.4983 68.4983

Jahe UV 6 69.5667 69.5667

Kunyit UV 6 69.5917 69.5917


Sig. .181 .097 .086 .060 .243


55

TVN_3

Duncan

Treatment N


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Garam 6

135.51900

Kunyit 6

143.80883

Kluwak 6

151.04483

Jahe 6

152.00217

Lengkuas 6

157.82467

Jahe UV 6

170.40717

Kunyit UV

6 178.22

650

Lengkuas UV

6 182.41

033

Kluwak UV

6 193.44

067

Garam UV

6 196.56

833 Sig. 1.000 1.000 .281 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000. TMA_3 Duncan

Treatment N


1 2 3 4 5 6

Jahe UV 6 31.23500

Lengkuas 6 31.47067


Kunyit 6 36.00750

Kluwak UV 6 38.03400

Jahe 6 39.44800

Kunyit UV 6 40.73767

Garam 6 42.84050

Kluwak 6 42.91967

Garam UV 6 46.36850

Sig. .725 .198 1.000 .059 .906 1.000


56

Hard_3

Duncan

Treatment N


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Kluwak 6

741.09450

Jahe 6

742.69800

Kunyit 6

895.40967

Garam 6

899.70917

Garam UV 6

949.52100

Lengkuas 6

1139.26650

Lengkuas UV

6 1167.31

417

Jahe UV 6

1588.86383

Kluwak UV 6

1735.97367

Kunyit UV 6

2437.15200

Sig. .759 .412 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000. Spring_3 Duncan

Treatment N


1 2 3 4

Kunyit 6 2.47500


Kunyit UV 6 2.83667

Lengkuas 6 2.86650

Jahe UV 6 3.11850

Kluwak UV 6 3.12600

Kluwak 6 3.18283

Jahe 6 3.27867

Garam 6 3.53900

Garam UV 6 3.60350

Sig. 1.000 .346 .208 .575


57

TPC_3 Duncan

Treatment N


1 2 3 4 5 6

Kluwak 6 6.74083

Garam UV 6 6.79117

Jahe UV 6 7.03317

Garam 6 7.12517 7.12517

Kunyit UV 6 7.20883 7.20883

Kluwak UV 6 7.26850 7.26850 7.26850

Lengkuas UV 6 7.29183 7.29183 7.29183

Kunyit 6 7.31300 7.31300

Lengkuas 6 7.40400 7.40400

Jahe 6 7.51500

Sig. .539 .264 .066 .251 .135 .179

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000. Air_7 Duncan

Treatment N


1 2 3 4

Kluwak 6 55.7650

Jahe 6 56.3467

Garam 6 56.5533

Kunyit 6 56.9467

Lengkuas 6 57.2650

Kluwak UV 6 69.3167

Lengkuas UV 6 71.0133 71.0133

Jahe UV 6 71.2017

Garam UV 6 71.2783

Kunyit UV 6 73.6600

Sig. .120 .050 .771 1.000


58

T_Air_7 Duncan

Treatment N


1 2 3

Kluwak 6 .6486

Jahe 6 .6538

Garam 6 .6556

Kunyit 6 .6591

Lengkuas 6 .6617

Kluwak UV 6 .7592

Lengkuas UV 6 .7716

Jahe UV 6 .7731

Garam UV 6 .7734

Kunyit UV 6 .7904

Sig. .079 .052 1.000

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000. TVN_7 Duncan

Treatment N


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Jahe UV 6

174.08050

Kunyit 6

175.01817

Lengkuas UV

6 186.496

33

Kunyit UV 6

188.91617

Garam 6

189.35083

Lengkuas 6

195.45817

Kluwak UV 6

207.79317

Kluwak 6

213.40483

Jahe 6

221.79733

Garam UV 6

227.49650

Sig. .306 1.000 .634 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000


59

TMA_7

Duncan

Treatment N


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Jahe UV 6

38.76750

Lengkuas UV

6 51.601

17

Kluwak UV

6 53.013

33

Kunyit 6

56.43083

Kunyit UV 6

58.75683

Garam UV

6 65.522

83

Garam 6

78.24450

Lengkuas 6

80.61600

Jahe 6

92.42217

Kluwak 6

95.91350

Sig. 1.000 .130 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000


Hard_7 Duncan

Treatment N


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Lengkuas UV

6 1083.89300

Kunyit UV

6 1333.00700

Jahe UV 6

1358.02600

Kunyit 6

1948.39900

Jahe 6

2009.11317

Garam UV

6 2153.

64817

Garam 6

2464.72100

Lengkuas

6 2714.

29617

Kluwak UV

6 2853.

79017

Kluwak 6

3134.08117

Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000


60

Spring_7 Duncan

Treatment N


1 2 3 4 5


Kunyit UV 6 3.02483 3.02483

Kunyit 6 3.10083 3.10083

Lengkuas 6 3.15100 3.15100

Jahe UV 6 3.15417 3.15417

Garam UV 6 3.27983 3.27983

Kluwak UV 6 3.32317 3.32317

Kluwak 6 3.55000 3.55000

Jahe 6 3.65583

Garam 6 4.16767

Sig. .239 .050 .057 .425 1.000

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000. TPC_7 Duncan

Treatment N


1 2 3 4

Kluwak 6 7.20400

Kunyit UV 6 7.29383 7.29383

Kunyit 6 7.44150 7.44150

Jahe UV 6 7.47433

Garam 6 7.48917

Kluwak UV 6 7.49117

Garam UV 6 7.50183


Jahe 6 7.60800 7.60800

Lengkuas 6 7.72100

Sig. .241 .057 .061 .142


6. daftar pustaka - repository.unika.ac.idrepository.unika.ac.id/1259/7/07.70.0144 dominicus...

Documents