59| p a g e international standard serial number (issn .... rpa16172425016.pdf · diffusion...
TRANSCRIPT
59| P a g e International Standard Serial Number (ISSN): 2319-8141
Full Text Available On www.ijupbs.com
International Journal of Universal Pharmacy and Bio Sciences 6(3): May-June 2017
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNIVERSAL
PHARMACY AND BIO SCIENCES IMPACT FACTOR 2.96***
ICV 6.16***
Pharmaceutical Sciences REVIEW ARTICLE …………!!!
MICROSPHERES AS DRUG CARRIERS FOR CONTROLLED DRUG
DELIVERY
Shilpa Kumaria*
, Seema Sainia, Naresh Singh Gill
b
aDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Rayat Institute of Pharmacy, Railmajra, SBS Nagar
bDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Rayat Institute of Pharmacy, Railmajra, SBS
Nagar.
KEYWORDS:
Microspheres, Prolonged
Release, Bioadhesive,
Solvent, Technique,
Delivery, Novel.
For Correspondence:
Shilpa Kumari*
Address:
Department of
Pharmaceutics, Rayat
Institute of Pharmacy,
Railmajra, SBS Nagar.
ABSTRACT
Microspheres are multiparticulate drug delivery systems which are
prepared to obtain prolong or controlled drug delivery to improve
bioavailability, stability and to target the drug to specific site at a
predetermined rate. They are characteristically free flowing powders
having particle size ranging from 1-1000 μm. They have various types
like Bioadhesive microspheres, Magnetic microspheres, Floating
microspheres, Radioactive microspheres, Polymeric microspheres,
Biodegradable polymeric microspheres. They are prepared by methods
like Spray Drying, Solvent Evaporation, Single emulsion technique,
Double emulsion technique, Phase separation coacervation technique,
Spray drying and spray congealing, Solvent extraction, Quassi emulsion
solvent diffusion. In future by combining various other strategies,
microspheres will find the central place in novel drug delivery,
particularly in diseased cell sorting, diagnostics, gene & genetic
materials, safe, targeted and effective in vivo delivery and supplements as
miniature versions of diseased organ and tissues in the body.
60 | P a g e International Standard Serial Number (ISSN): 2319-8141
Full Text Available On www.ijupbs.com
INTRODUCTION
1. Controlled drug delivery system:
A controlled drug delivery system is usually designed to deliver the drug at particular rate. Safe and
effective blood levels are maintained for a period as long as the system continues to delivery the
drug. This predetermined rate of drug release is based on the desired therapeutic concentration and
the drug’s pharmacokinetics. The basic rationale for controlled drug delivery is to alter the
pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pharmacologically active moieties by using novel drug
delivery system or by modifying the molecular structure and or physiological parameters 1.This
system plays a vital role in controlling the pharmacological effect of drug as it can influence the
pharmacokinetic profile of the drug, the rate of drug release, the site and duration of action and
subsequently the side effect profile. An optimal drug delivery system ensures that the active drug is
available at the site of action for the correct time and duration. The concentration at appropriate site
should be above the minimal effective concentration (MEC) and below the minimal toxic
concentration (MTC). This concentration interval is known as the therapeutic range. Achieving the
desired concentration of drug is dependent on the frequency of dosing, the drug clearance rate, and
the route of administration. The CRDDS can reduce the undesired fluctuation of drug level, thus
diminishing side effects while improving the therapeutic outcome of the drug 2.
Figure1: Plasma drug con. Profile from conventional multiple dosing and an ideal controlled
delivery formulation3.
1.2 Advantages of controlled drug delivery:
Maintenance of drug levels within a desired range.
Delivery of “difficult” drugs: slow release of water-soluble drugs, fast release of low
solubility drugs.
Less dosing and increased patient compliance.
Eliminate over or under dosing.
Prevention of side effects.
61 | P a g e International Standard Serial Number (ISSN): 2319-8141
Full Text Available On www.ijupbs.com
Reduction in Health care cost.
Improved efficiency in treatment.
Reduction in adverse side effects and improvement in tolerability 4.
1.3 Mechanism of Controlled Drug Release Systems:
The controlled release formulations can be divided into different categories based on the
mechanism of drug release.
Diffusion Controlled System:
Basically diffusion process shows the movement of drug molecules from a region of a higher
concentration to one of lower concentration. The flux of the drug J (in amount / area -time), across
a membrane in the direction of decreasing concentration is given by Fick’s law.
J= - D dc/dx ……….Eq.1
Where, D = diffusion coefficient in area/ time, dc/dx = change of concentration 'c' with distance 'x'
Diffusion systems are characterized by release rate of drug is dependent on its diffusion through
inert water insoluble membrane barrier. There are basically two types of diffusion devices5.
a) Reservoir Type:
In the system, a water insoluble polymeric material encloses a core of drug, which controls release
rate. Drug will partition into the membrane and exchange with the fluid surrounding the particle or
tablet.
Figure 2: Schematic Representation of Reservoir Diffusion Controlled Drug Delivery Device
The rate of drug released (dm/dt) can be calculated using the following equation
Dm/dt = ADK∆C/ ℓ ……….Eq.2
Where, A = Area, D = Diffusion coefficient, K = Partition coefficient of the drug between the drug
core and the membrane, ℓ = Diffusion path length, ΔC= Concentration difference across the
membrane 6, 7
.
62 | P a g e International Standard Serial Number (ISSN): 2319-8141
Full Text Available On www.ijupbs.com
b) Matrix Type:
A solid drug is homogenously dispersed in an insoluble matrix and the rate of release of drug is
dependent on the rate of drug diffusion and not on the rate of solid dissolution 8, 9
.
Figure 3: Schematic Representation of Monolithic (matrix) Diffusion Controlled Drug Delivery
Device
Dissolution Controlled Systems:
Drugs having high aqueous solubility and dissolution rate, shows challenge in controlling their
dissolution rate. Dissolution-controlled release can be obtained by slowing the dissolution rate of a
drug in the GI medium, incorporating the drug in an insoluble polymer and coating drug particles or
granules with polymeric materials of varying thickness. The rate limiting step for dissolution of a
drug is the diffusion across the aqueous boundary layer. The solubility of the drug provides the
source of energy for drug release, which is countered by the stagnant-fluid diffusional boundary
layer. The rate of dissolution (dm/dt) can be approximated by:
dm/dt = ADS/h …………Eq.3
Where, S = Aqueous solubility of the drug, A = Surface area of the dissolving particle or tablet.
D = Diffusivity of the drug and h = Thickness of the boundary layer 10, 11
a) Encapsulation Dissolution Controlled Systems:
The drug particles are coated or encapsulated by microencapsulation techniques with slowly
dissolving materials like cellulose, poly ethylene glycols, polymethacrylates, waxes etc. the
dissolution rate of coat depends upon the solubility and thickness of the coating. Those with the
thinnest layers will provide the initial dose. The maintenance of drug levels at late times will be
achieved from those with thicker coating 12
.
Figure 4: Encapsulation Dissolution Controlled Systems
63 | P a g e International Standard Serial Number (ISSN): 2319-8141
Full Text Available On www.ijupbs.com
b) Matrix Dissolution Controlled Systems:
In matrix systems the drug is homogeneously dispersed throughout a rate controlling medium. The
drug release is often first order from such matrices 13
.
Dissolution and Diffusion Controlled Release Systems
The drug core is enclosed in a partially soluble membrane. Pores are thus created due to dissolution
of parts of the membrane which permit entry of aqueous medium into the core and hence drug
dissolution and diffusion of dissolved drug out of the system14, 15, 16
.
Figure 5: Dissolution and Diffusion Controlled Release System
Water Penetration Controlled Systems:
In water penetration controlled delivery systems, rate control is obtained by the penetration
of water into the system17
. They are:
Swelling Controlled Systems
Osmotically Controlled Release Systems.
Methods using lon Exchange:
This system is designed to provide the controlled release of an ionic or ionizable drug 18
. The drug is
released by exchanging with appropriately charged ions in the GIT. The drug is then diffuse out of the
resin 19
.
Resin+ - drug- + X- resin+ - X- + drug- ………….Eq.4
Where X- is ions in the GIT, They are mainly of 2 types cation exchange and anion exchange resin.
Chemically Controlled Release Systems:
Chemically controlled release systems are the systems that change their chemical structure, when
exposed to biological fluid20
.
pH– Independent Formulations:
As we know that the most of drugs are either weak acids or weak bases, the release from sustained
release formulations is pH dependent. However, buffers such as salts of amino acids, citric acid,
phthalic acid phosphoric acid or tartaric acid can be added to the formulation, to help to maintain a
constant pH thereby rendering pH independent drug release 21
.
64 | P a g e International Standard Serial Number (ISSN): 2319-8141
Full Text Available On www.ijupbs.com
Hydrogels:
Hydrogels are water swollen three dimensional structures composed of primarily hydrophilic
polymers. They are insoluble because of chemical or physical cross-links. Hydrogels provide
desirable protection of labile drugs, peptides and proteins 22, 23
.
Altered Density Formulations:
Several approaches have been developed to prolong the residence time of drug delivery system in
the gastrointestinal tract like High density approach and Low density approach 24
.
2. Microspheres:
Microspheres are characteristically free flowing powders consisting of proteins or synthetic
polymers which are biodegradable in nature and ideally having a particle size less than 200 μm and
with diameters 1 μm to 1000 μm25
. Microspheres are sometimes referred to as microparticles.
Microspheres can be manufactured from various natural and synthetic materials. Glass
microspheres, polymer microspheres and ceramic microspheres are commercially available 26
. They
can be delivered through various routes like oral, nasal, colonal, parentally, opthalmic and
transdermal etc27
.
2.1 Advantages of microspheres:
Particle size reduction for enhancing solubility of the poorly soluble drug.
Provide constant and prolonged therapeutic effect.
Provide constant drug concentration in blood thereby increasing patient compliance.
Decrease dose and toxicity.
Protect the drug from enzymatic and photolytic cleavage hence found to be best for drug delivery of
protein.
Reduce the dosing frequency and thereby improve the patient compliance.
Better drug utilization will improve the bioavailability and reduce the incidence or intensity of
adverse effects.
Microsphere morphology allows a controllable variability in degradation and drug release.
Convert liquid to solid form & to mask the bitter taste.
Protects the GIT from irritant effects of the drug.
Biodegradable microspheres have the advantage over large polymer implants in that they do not
require surgical procedures for implantation and removal.
Controlled release delivery biodegradable microspheres are used to control drug release rates
thereby decreasing toxic side effects, and eliminating the inconvenience of repeated injections 28
.
65 | P a g e International Standard Serial Number (ISSN): 2319-8141
Full Text Available On www.ijupbs.com
2.2 Types of microspheres:
Bioadhesive Microspheres
Adhesion can be defined as sticking of drug to the membrane by using the sticking property of the
water soluble polymers. Adhesion of drug delivery device to the mucosal membrane such as buccal,
ocular, rectal, nasal etc. can be termed as bio adhesion. These kinds of microspheres exhibit a
prolonged residence time at the site of application and causes intimate contact with the absorption
site and produces better therapeutic action.
Magnetic Microspheres
This kind of delivery system is very much important which localizes the drug to the disease site. In
this larger amount of freely circulating drug can be replaced by smaller amount of magnetically
targeted drug. Magnetic carriers receive magnetic responses to a magnetic field from incorporated
materials that are used for magnetic microspheres are chitosan, dextran etc.
Floating microspheres
In floating types the bulk density is less than the gastric fluid and so remains buoyant in stomach
without affecting gastric emptying rate. The drug is released slowly at the desired rate, if the system
is floating on gastric content and increases gastric residence and increases fluctuation in plasma
concentration.
Polymeric Microspheres
The different types of polymeric microspheres can be classified as follows and they are
biodegradable polymeric microspheres and synthetic polymeric microspheres.
i. Biodegradable Polymeric Microspheres:
Natural polymers such as starch are used with the concept that they are biodegradable,
biocompatible, and also bioadhesive in nature. Biodegradable polymers prolong the residence time
when come in contact with mucous membrane due to its high degree of swelling property with
aqueous medium and results in gel formation. The rate and extent of drug release is controlled by
concentration of polymer and the release pattern in a sustained manner.
ii. Synthetic Polymeric Microspheres:
The interest of synthetic polymeric microspheres are widely used in clinical application, moreover
that also used as bulking agent, fillers, embolic particles drug delivery vehicles etc and proved to
be safe and biocompatible29
.
2.3 Material used in preparation of microspheres:
A number of different substances, both biodegradable as well as non-biodegradable have been
investigated for the preparation of microspheres. These materials include the polymers which are
classified into two categories:
66 | P a g e International Standard Serial Number (ISSN): 2319-8141
Full Text Available On www.ijupbs.com
1. Synthetic polymers
2. Natural polymers.
1. Synthetic polymers: They are employed as carrier materials and are divided into two
types:-
A) Non-biodegradable polymers: for ex- Poly methyl methacrylate, Glycidyl methacrylate,
Epoxy polymers.
B) Biodegradable polymers: for ex- Lactides and Glycolides and their copolymers, Poly alkyl
cyano acrylates, Poly anhydrides.
2. Natural polymers: They are obtained from different sources like proteins, carbohydrates,
and chemically modified carbohydrates.
A) Proteins- Albumin, Gelatin, Collagen.
B) Carbohydrates- Agarose, Gelatin, Starch, Chitosan, Carrageenan.
C) Chemically modified carbohydrates- Poly (acryl) dextran, starch, DEAE cellulose 30
.
2.4 Method for preparation of microspheres:
Techniques used for preparation of microspheres
Solvent evaporation technique -:
Solvent evaporation technique is one of the oldest and widely used methods for preparation of
microsphere. When drug loading is low, this method is used for preparation of microsphere. The
processes are carried out in a liquid manufacturing vehicle. The microcapsule coating is dispersed
in a volatile solvent which is immiscible with the liquid manufacturing vehicle phase. A core
material to be microencapsulated is dissolved or dispersed in the coating polymer solution. With
agitation the core material mixture is dispersed in the liquid manufacturing phase to obtain the
appropriate size microcapsule. The mixture is then heated if necessary to evaporate the solvent for
the polymer of the core material is disperse in the polymer solution, polymer shrinks around the
core. If the core material is dissolved in the coating polymer solution, matrix – type microcapsules
are formed. The core materials may be either water soluble or water insoluble materials. Solvent
evaporation involves the formation emulsion between polymer solution and an immiscible
continuous phase whether aqueous (o/w) or non-aqueous 31
.
Single emulsion techniques -:
There are several natural polymers for ex- carbohydrates and proteins that act as microparticulate
carriers and are prepared by single emulsion technique. In which the natural polymers are dissolved
or dispersed in the non-aqueous medium e.g. oil. In next step, cross linking is carried out by either
of two following methods 32
.
67 | P a g e International Standard Serial Number (ISSN): 2319-8141
Full Text Available On www.ijupbs.com
1. Cross linking by heat:
Cross linking by heat is carried out by adding the dispersion, to previously heated oil. Heat
denaturation is however, not suitable for the thermolabile drugs 33
.
2. Chemical cross linking:
Chemical cross liking is done with the help of agents such as glutraldehyde, formaldehyde,
terephthaloyl chloride etc. This method suffers from disadvantage of excessive exposure of active
ingredients to chemicals if added at the time of preparation, chitosan solution (in acetic acid) by
adding to liquid paraffin containing a surfactant resulting in the formation of w/o emulsion 34
.
Microspheres preparation by single emulsion technique shown in fig.6
Figure 6: Processing scheme for microspheres preparation by single emulsion technique
Double emulsion technique -:
Involves the formation of the multiple emulsions or the double emulsion of type w/o/w and is best
suited to the water-soluble drugs, peptides, proteins and the vaccines. The aqueous protein solution
is dispersed in a lipophilic organic continuous phase. This protein solution may contain the active
constituents. The continuous phase is generally consisted of the polymer solution that eventually
encapsulates of the protein contained in dispersed aqueous phase. The primary emulsion is then
subjected to the homogenization or the sonication before addition to the aqueous solution of the
polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). This results in the formation of the double emulsion. The emulsion is
then subjected to the solvent removal either by solvent evaporation or by solvent extraction process.
In the latter case, the emulsion is added to the large quantity of water (with or without surfactant)
into which organic phase diffuses out 35
.
68 | P a g e International Standard Serial Number (ISSN): 2319-8141
Full Text Available On www.ijupbs.com
Figure 7: Processing scheme for microspheres-preparation by double emulsion technique
Polymerization -: The polymerization techniques used for the preparation of the
microspheres are mainly classified as:
Normal polymerization
Interfacial polymerization
1. Normal polymerization
A) Bulk polymerization:
A monomer or a mixture of monomer along with the initiator is usually heated to initiate the
polymerization and carry out the process. The catalyst or the initiator is added to the reaction
mixture to facilitate or accelerate the rate of the reaction. The polymer so obtained may be molded
or fragmented as microspheres. For loading of drug, adsorptive drug loading or adding drug during
the process of polymerization may be adopted.
B) Suspension polymerization:
It is carried out by heating the monomer or mixture of monomers with active principles (drugs) as
droplets dispersion in a continuous aqueous phase. The droplets may also contain an initiator and
other additives.
C) Emulsion polymerization:
However, differs from the suspension polymerization as due to presence of the initiator in the
aqueous phase, which later on diffuses to the surface of the micelles or the emulsion globules.
2. Interfacial Polymerization -:
In Interfacial polymerization technique two reacting monomers are employed; one of which is
dissolved in the continuous phase while the other being dispersed in the continuous phase. The
continuous phase is generally aqueous in nature through which the second monomer is emulsified.
The monomers present in either phase diffuse rapidly and polymerize rapidly at the interface. Two
conditions arise depending upon the solubility of formed polymer in the emulsion droplet. If the
polymer is soluble in the droplet it will lead to the formation of the monolithic type of the carrier on
69 | P a g e International Standard Serial Number (ISSN): 2319-8141
Full Text Available On www.ijupbs.com
the hand if the polymer is insoluble in the monomer droplet, the formed carrier is of capsular
(reservoir) type 36
.
Phase separation coacervation technique -:
In this process the solubility of polymer is decreased in the organic phase to affect the formation of
the polymer rich phase known as coacervates. It is used for the preparation of reservoir type system
encapsulated water soluble drug such as proteins, peptides37
. The phase separation coacervation
method shown in the fig.8.
Figure 8: Coacervation phase separation method
Spray drying technique -:
In spray drying process, core material is dispersed in coating solution, in which the coating
substance is dissolved and in which the polymer is insoluble, followed by atomisation of the
mixture into air stream.
Principle: Three steps involved during spray drying process are:
Atomisation-It involves conversion of a liquid feed into fine droplet.
Mixing-Mixing is carried out by passing hot air stream through spray droplets, which causes
evaporation of liquid and leaving behind dried particles.
Dry- Dried powder is separated from the air stream and collected.
Spray Congealing Technique
Spray congealing technique is similar as that of spray drying technique; the difference between
two techniques is only that the dispersion of core material is done in a melted coating substance
not in a coating solution followed by atomisation into air stream. Substance such as fatty acid,
polymer, waxes, sugars which are solid at room temperature, but can be melted at certain
70 | P a g e International Standard Serial Number (ISSN): 2319-8141
Full Text Available On www.ijupbs.com
temperature can be used in spray congealing technique 38
.
Figure 9: Spray drying and spray congealing
Solvent extraction:
For the formation of the emulsion between polymer solution and an immiscible continuous phase in
aqueous (o/w) as well as non-aqueous phase (w/o) 39.
2.5 Application of microspheres:
Prolonged release dosage forms. The microsphere drug can be administered, as microsphere
is perhaps most useful for the preparation of tablets, capsules or parenteral dosage forms.
Microsphere can be used to prepare enteric-coated dosage forms, so that the medicament
will be selectively absorbed in the intestine rather than the stomach.
From the mechanical point of view, microsphere has been used to aid in the addition of oily
medicines to tableted dosage forms. This has been used to overcome problems inherent in
producing tablets from otherwise tacky granulations. This was accomplished through
improved flow properties. For example, the non-flowable multicomponent solid mixture of
niacin, riboflavin, and thiamine hydrochloride and iron phosphate may be encapsulated and
made directly into tablets.
It has been used to protect drugs from environmental hazards such as humidity, light,
oxygen or heat.
Release of proteins, hormones and peptides over extended period of time.
Gene therapy with DNA plasmids and also delivery of insulin.
Vaccine delivery for treatment of diseases like hepatitis, influenza, pertussis, ricin toxoid,
diphtheria, birth control.
Passive targeting of leaky tumour vessels, active targeting of tumour cells, antigens, by
intra-arterial/intravenous application.
Tumour targeting with doxorubicin and also treatments of leishmaniasis.
Magnetic microspheres can be used for stem cell extraction and bone marrow purging.
71 | P a g e International Standard Serial Number (ISSN): 2319-8141
Full Text Available On www.ijupbs.com
Used in isolation of antibodies, cell separation and toxin extraction by affinity
chromatography.
Used for various diagnostic tests for infectious diseases like bacterial, viral, and fungal.
Can be used for radio embolisation of liver and spleen tumours.
Used for radio synvectomy of arthritis joint, local radiotherapy, interactivity treatment.
Imaging of liver, spleen, bone marrow, lung and even imaging of thrombus in deep vein
thrombosis can be done.
Determining the imaging of particular sites using radio labeled microspheres40, 41, 42
.
2.6 Variables influencing drug release pattern of microspheres:
There are following factors which directly/indirectly affect the drug release characteristics of the
microspheres:
Concentration of the polymer in dispersed phase:
Polymer concentration in aqueous phase indirectly affects the time and drug release. As the
polymer concentration in aqueous phase increases, size of microspheres is increased which results
increase in time and slower drug release from microspheres.
Drug: Polymer Ratio (DPR):
Drug release from microspheres is affected by the ratio of the drug to the polymer as increasing in
the first causes faster drug release. By increasing the amount of drug loading, a point will be
reached when the solid drug particles upon dissolution will begin to form continuous pores or
channels within the matrix. Under these circumstances, the path of release for drug molecules will
be diffusion within the channels formed from areas where drug has previously leached out from the
matrix. In other words, as the amount of drug content is increased the matrix will become more
porous as drug is leached out from the polymer and thus faster release rate occurs. At lower drug-
polymer ratios, the mean particle size of the micropellets was less than that at higher drug-polymer
ratios. Therefore, the drug release from micropellets prepared at lower drug- polymer ratios was
faster than that of micropellets prepared at higher drug polymer ratios because of the small size of
the micropellets, which provided a large surface area for faster drug release.
Selection of solvent system for the dispersed phase:
Selection of solvent system based on the volatility of solvent, solubility of polymer and type of
method of preparation used for preparation of microspheres. Solvent should have high volatility and
high polymer solubility.
72 | P a g e International Standard Serial Number (ISSN): 2319-8141
Full Text Available On www.ijupbs.com
Effect of Temperature:
Microspheres prepared at 60℃ showed faster drug release than the microspheres prepared at 10 ℃.
This can be attributed to the decrease in viscosity of the oily phase as the temperature increases,
which in turn decrease the microspheres.
Effect of stirring speed:
The drug release rate was increasing on increasing the stirring rate. Drug release was higher in the
case of microspheres prepared at a higher stirring rate but at low stirring rate the release rate was
slow. This can be attributing that smaller size microspheres have a larger surface area exposed to
dissolution medium, giving rise to faster drug release43
.
REFERENCES:
1. Farraj NF, Johansen BR and Illum SS,(2002),Nasal administration of insulin using
bioadhesive microspheres as a delivery system Gwen M. Jantzen and Joseph R. Robinson.
Sustained and Controlled Release Drug Delivery System In: Modern Pharmaceutics; 4:503-
504.
2. Nalla C, Gopinath H, Debjit B, Williamkeri I and Reddy TA,(2013),Modified release
dosage forms. J Chem Pharm Sci ; 6(1): 13-21.
3. Vyas SP, Khar RK, Controlled drug delivery Concept and Advances,2002, Vallabh
Prakashan Publishers; 1:156-157.
4. Brahmnkar D.M, Jaiswal SB,(1995),Biopharmaceutics and pharmacokinetics- a treatise,
Vallabh Prakashan;2:398-399.
5. Nidhi Patel, (2016) .Controlled Drug Delivery System: A Review. Indo Am. J. Pharm. Sci;
3(3).227
6. Leon, L., & Herbert, L.A, (2002), Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. New York: Marcel
Dekker.
7. Kar RK, Mohapatra S and Barik BB,(2009),Design and characterization of controlled
release matrix tablets of Zidovudine. Asian J Pharm Cli Res; 2: 54.
8. Salsa T, Veiga F and Pina ME, (1997) ,Oral controlled release dosage form. I. Cellulose
ether polymers in hydrophilic matrices. Drug Develop Ind Pharm;23: 929-93
9. Kumar S, Shashikant and Bharat P, (2012), Sustained release drug delivery system: a
review. Int J Inst Pharm Life Sci; 2(3): 356-376.
10. Cristina M, Aranzazu Z and Jose ML, (2011), Critical factors in the release of drugs from
sustained release hydrophilic matrices. J Control Rel; 1: 2-19.
11. Theeuwes, F, (1975), Elementary Osmotic Pump. J Pharm Sci; 64, 1987–1991.
73 | P a g e International Standard Serial Number (ISSN): 2319-8141
Full Text Available On www.ijupbs.com
12. Mamidala R, Ramana V, Lingam M, Gannu R and Rao MY, (2009), Review article factors
influencing the design and performance of oral sustained/controlled release dosage form. Int
JPharm Sci Nanotechnology; 2:583.
13. Chugh I, Seth N, Rana AC and Gupta S,(2012),Oral sustained release drug delivery system:
an overview. Int Res J Pharm;3(5): 57-62.
14. Bhargava A, Rathore RPS, Tanwar YS, Gupta S and Bhaduka G,(2013), Oral sustained
release dosage form: an opportunity to prolong the release of drug. Int J Adv Res Pharm
Bio Sci; 3(1):7-14.
15. Thakor RS, Majmudar FD, Patel JK and Rajpit JC, (2010), Review: osmotic drug delivery
systems current scenario. J Pharm Res; 3(4):771-775.
16. Parashar T, Soniya, Singh V, Singh G, Tyagi S, Patel C and Gupta A,(2013), Novel oral
sustained release technology: a concise review. Int Res J Dev Pharm Life Sci;2(2): 262-269.
17. Modi K, Modi M, Mishra D, Panchal M, Sorathiya U and Shelat P, (2013), Oral controlled
release drug delivery system: an overview. Int Res J Pharm; 4(3): 70-76.
18. Ratnaparkhi MP and Gupta JP, (2013), Sustained release oral drug delivery system - an
overview. Int JPharm Res Rev;2(3): 11-21.
19. Patel PN, Patel MM, Rathod DM, Patel JN and Modasiya MMK, (2012), Sustain Release
Drug Delivery: A Theoretical Prospective. J Pharm Res; (8): 4165-4168.
20. Shamma SP, Haranath C, Reddy CPS and Sowmya C,(2014), An overview on SR tablet and
its technology. Int J Pharm Drug Ana; 2(9): 740-747.
21. Chauhan MJ and Patel SA, (2012), A concise review on sustained drug delivery system and
its opportunities. Am J Pharm Tech Res; 2(2): 227-238.
22. Allen L.V, Popvich, G.N, & Ansel H.C, (2004), Ansel’s Pharmaceutical dosage forms and
drug delivery system.
23. Kube RS, Kadam VS, Shendarkar GR, Jadhav SB and Bharkad VB,(2015), Sustained
release drug delivery system: review. Int J Res Pharm Biotech; 3(3) 246:-251.
24. Mali AD and Bathe AS,(2015), A review on sustained release drug delivery system. GCC J
Sci Tech; 1(4): 107-123.
25. Lapidus H and Lordi NG, (1968), Studies on controlled release formulations. J Pharm
Sci;57:1292.
26. Vyas S.P. and R.K. Khar, (1990), Targeted and Controlled Drug Delivery. Vallabh
Prakashan, New Delhi, India; 7: 418.
74 | P a g e International Standard Serial Number (ISSN): 2319-8141
Full Text Available On www.ijupbs.com
27. Kataria Sahil, Middha Akanksha, Sandhu Premjeet, Ajay Bilandi and Bhawana Kapoor,
(2011), MICROSPHERE: A REVIEW.IJRPC; 1(4):1184.
28. Pradhi Srivastava and Sharad Visht, (2013), Application and advancement of microsphere
as controlled delivery system: A review Int. J. of Pharm. & Life Sci. (IJPLS); 4: 2583-2594.
29. Kadam N. R. and Suvarna V, (2015), MICROSPHERES: A BRIEF REVIEW. Asian
Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences;5(47): 13-19.
30. R. Santosh Kumar, G.V. Radha and T. Naga Satya Yagnesh Reshma Mohan M., Daisy P.
A., Praveen Raj R., Boby Johns G., Noby Thomas and Betty Carla,(2017),
MICROSPHERES – “A NOVEL TREND IN DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM”
.wjpmr;3(2):100-106.
31. Prasad Giri Sree B, Gupta M.R.V and Devanna,(2014), Microspheres as a drug delivery
system. JGTPS; 5(3): 1961-1972.
32. Keerthi T.S, S Vinupama. Biodecomposible Polymeric Microspheres. International Bulletin
of Drug Research. 2012; 1(2): 81.
33. Patil JS, Jagadhane VB, Jamagondi LN, Gurav PB,(2010),Rifampicin loaded spray-dried
olibanum gum resin pulmospheres for lung delivery. Journal of Drug Delivery and
Therapeutics;2(1):15-20.
34. Sinha V.R, Wadhawan , Kumaria R, Singla A.K, Kaushik Rand Dhawan S,(2004),
Chitosan microspheres as a potential carrier for drugs. International Journal of
Pharmaceutics; 19:1-33.
35. Jayaprakash S, Halith S, Md. Firthouse P.V, Kulaturanpillai K, Nagarajan M and
Abhijith,(2009), Preparation and evaluation of biodegradable microspheres of methotrexate.
Asian Journal of Pharmacy; 3:9-26.
36. Mr. Amol Chaudhari, Mr. K.R. Jadhav and Dr. V.J.Kadam, (2010), An Over View:
Microspheres as a nasal drug delivery system.IJPS;5(1):78.
37. U. Edlund, A.Cand Albertsson, Degradable Polymer Microspheres for Controlled Drug
Delivery Springer/0012/papers/2157/21570067.
38. Acikgoz M, Kas HS, Orman M and Hincal AA,(1996), Chitosan microspheres of diclofenac
sodium: I. application of factorial design and evaluation of release kinetics. J. Microsphere;
1: 13.
39. Parvez Nayyar, Sharma Kumar Pramod and Malik Abdul, (2014), Novel Methods of
Microsphere Formulation.World Appl. Sci. J; 32 (5): 839-847.
75 | P a g e International Standard Serial Number (ISSN): 2319-8141
Full Text Available On www.ijupbs.com
40. Yadav Vijay and Varshney M.H, (2013), Microsphere: A review. Journal of Drug
Discovery and Therapeutics;1 (7): 23-33.
41. Donnell O and Mc Ginity Jm,(1990), J. Control. Release; 1: 253-261.
42. Bhople Amit, Chandewar Anil and Sheiakh Sameer, (2012), Formulation and development
of mucoadhesive microcapsule for delivery of Clarithromycin and Omeprazole used against
Helicobacter pylori infection. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Life Science; 2(1): 27-47.
43. Kaur Dupinder, (2012), Biodegradable Microsphere. IRJ p; 3 (12): 23-26.