54411221 capital rationing

8/2/2019 54411221 Capital Rationing

1/4

CAPITAL RATIONING

INTRODUCTION:

When funds are insufficient, the firm has to choose some more profitable projects

And reject some less profitable investment proposals. Thus, because of lack of funds,

The firm is able to invest in all profitable projects the extent to which the funds are sufficient.

MEANING:

Capital rationing refers to a situation where the firm is constrained for external or inernal

Reasons to secure the necessary funds to invest in all profitable investment proposals.

With a capital rationing constraint, the firm attempts to select the combination of investment

Proposals that will provide the greatest increase in the value of the firm subject to not exceeding

The budget ceilling constraint.

FINANCIAL DEFINITION:

The act or practice of limiting a companies investment. That is, capital rationing occurs when a

Companies management places a maximum amount on new investment, it can make over a given

period of time.

Types leading to capital rationing

Two different types of capital rationing situation can be identified, distinguished

by the sources of the capital expenditure constraint.

External capital rationing


2/4

This mainly occurs on account of the imperfections in capital markets.Imperfections may be caused by deficiencies in market information, or by rigiditiesof attitude that hamper the free flow of capital. The net present value rule will notwork if shareholders do not have access to the capital markets. Imperfections incapital markets alone do not invalidate use of the net present value rule. In reality,we will have very few situations where capital markets do not exist forshareholders.

Internal capital rationing

This is caused by self imposed restrictions by the management. Various types ofconstraints may be imposed. For example, it may be decide not to obtain additionalfunds by incurring debt. This may be a part of the firms conservative financial

policy. Management may fix an arbitrary limit to the amount of funds to be

invested by the divisional managers. Sometimes management may resort to capitalrationing by requiring a minimum rate of return higher than the cost of capital.Whatever, may be the type of restrictions, the implication is that some of the

profitable projects will have to be forgone because of the lack of funds. However,the net present value rule will work since shareholders can borrow or lend in thecapital markets.

It is quite difficult sometimes justify the internal rationing. But generally it is usedas a means of financial controls. In a divisional set up, the divisional managers

may overstate their investment requirements. One way of forcing them to carefully

assess their investment opportunities and set priorities is to put upper limits to theircapital expenditures. Similarly, a company may put investment limits if it findsitself incapable of coping with the strains and organizational problems of a fastgrowth


3/4

Capital Rationing

Note:

Capital rationing exists when an artificial

constraint is placed on the amount of funds

that can be invested. In this case, a firm may

be confronted with more desirable projects

than it is willing to finance. A wealth

maximizing firm would not engage in capital

rationing.

Capital Rationing: An Example(Firms Cost of Capital = 12%)

Independent projects ranked according to their

IRRs:Project Project Size IRR

E $20,000 21.0%

B 25,000 19.0

G 25,000 18.0

H 10,000 17.5

D 25,000 16.5

A 15,000 14.0

F 15,000 11.0

C 30,000 10.0


4/4

Capital Rationing Example (Continued)

No Capital Rationing - Only projects F and C wouldbe rejected. The firms capital budget would be

$120,000.

Capital Rationing - Suppose the capital budget is

constrained to be $80,000. Using the IRR criterion,

only projects E, B, G, and H, would be accepted, even

though projects D and A would also add value to the

firm. Also note, however, that a theoretical optimum

could be reached only be evaluating all possible

combinations of projects in order to determine theportfolio of projects with the highest NPV.

Required Returns for Individual Projects That

Vary in Risk Levels

Higher hurdle rates should be used for

projects that are riskier than the existing

firm, and lower hurdle rates should be used

for lower risk projects.

Measuring risk and specifying the tradeoff

between required return and risk, however,

are indeed difficult endeavors.

Interested students should read Chapter 13

entitled Risk and Capital Budgeting.

54411221 capital rationing

Documents