500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 figure 1. topography (m, shaded following inset scale) of the...

40
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 Figure 1. Topography (m, shaded following inset scale) of the Intermountain West and adjoining region. 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 Sierr a Nevad a C a sc ade Mo u nt ai n s Add all geographic references in text

Post on 22-Dec-2015

244 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Figure 1. Topography (m, shaded following inset scale) of the Intermountain West and adjoining region.

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Sierra N

evada

Cascade M

ountains

Add all geographic references in text

a) FULLTER

a) NOSIERRA

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Figure 2. WRF topography [m, shaded following scale in (a)] for a subset of the (a) FULLTER and (b) NOSIERRA 12-km nested domain.

a) NORTH

b) CENTRAL

c) SOUTH

Figure 3. Outer domain initial 500-hPa geopotential height (black dashed contours, every 120 m) and lowest half-η level potential temperature (gray contours every 3 K) for (a) NORTH, (b) CENTRAL, and (c) SOUTH. Inner domain indicated by inset box.

Need to add contour labels. Should be able to do this by hand,perhaps on every other one. I also think the domainInset position is incorrect in at least one of these.

Does the outer domain geographic region shift southward?

Figure 4. WRF-model analyses for 1500 UTC 25 Mar 2006. (a) FULLTER radar reflectivity [dBZ, color shaded according to scale in (a)], cloud-top temperature (°C, grey shaded according to scale in (b)], and geopotential height (solid contours every 10 m). (b) Same as (a) but for NOSIERRA. (c) FULLTER lowest half-η level potential temperature (every 2 K), wind (vector scale at left), and kinematic frontogenesis [K (100 km h)−1, shaded following scale at left]. (d) Same as (c), but for NOSIERRA. (e) Same as (c), but with diabatic frontogenesis. (f) As in (e) but for NOSIERRA.

Greg-I’ve made some slight adjustments to front/trof positioning here and in subsequent figsShould match Steenburgh et al. (2009)

c) FULLTER Kinematic (Fw) 1500 UTC

e) FULLTER Diabatic (FD) 1500 UTC

d) NOSIERRA Kinematic (Fw) 1500 UTC

f) NOSIERRA Diabatic (FD) 1500 UTC

288296

296

288 296

288

10

-10

30

50

-30

-50

20 ms-1

288296

296

288 296

288

a) FULLTER Cloud/Radar 1500 UTC b) NOSIERRA Cloud/Radar 1500 UTC

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

Figure 5. Same as Fig. 4 except for 1800 UTC 25 Mar 2006.

c) FULLTER Kinematic (Fw) 1800 UTC d) NOSIERRA Kinematic (Fw) 1800 UTC

10

-10

30

50

-30

-50

20 ms-1

e) FULLTER Diabatic (FD) 1800 UTC f) NOSIERRA Diabatic (FD) 1800 UTC

288

296

288 296

288

296

288 296

a) FULLTER Cloud/Radar 1800 UTC b) NOSIERRA Cloud/Radar 1800 UTC

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

Figure 6. Same as Fig. 4 except for 2100 UTC 25 Mar 2006.

c) FULLTER Kinematic (Fw) 2100 UTC d) NOSIERRA Kinematic (Fw) 2100 UTC

10

-10

30

50

-30

-50

20 ms-1

e) FULLTER Diabatic (FD) 2100 UTC f) NOSIERRA Diabatic (FD) 2100 UTC

288

296304

288

296

296

304

a) FULLTER Cloud/Radar 2100 UTC b) NOSIERRA Cloud/Radar 2100 UTC

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

288

296304

288

296

296

304

c) FULLTER Kinematic (Fw) 0000 UTC d) NOSIERRA Kinematic (Fw) 0000 UTC

10

-10

30

50

-30

-50

20 ms-1

c) FULLTER Diabatic (FD) 0000 UTC d) NOSIERRA Diabatic (FD) 0000 UTC

Figure 7. Same as Fig. 4 except for 0000 UTC 26 Mar 2006.

a) FULLTER Cloud/Radar 0000 UTC b) NOSIERRA Cloud/Radar 0000 UTC

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

288

296

304

288

296

304

288

296

304

288

296

304

e) FULLTER Diabatic (FD) 0000 UTC f) NOSIERRA Diabatic (FD) 0000 UTC

Figure 3.8. Potential temperature anomaly cross sections. Cross sections of potential temperature (contoured every 2K), and circulation vectors [according to scale in (a)] at 1500 UTC for (a) FULLTERR, (b) NOSIERRA, and (c) FULLTERR-NOSIERRA difference. Location XY shown in Fig. 3.4.

(b)

500

700

800

900

1000

600

(hPa)

X

(a)

X

500

700

800

900

1000

600

(hPa)

(c)

X

500

700

800

900

1000

600

(hPa)

5 Pa s-1

25 m s-1

Y

Y

Y

Figure 3.9. Skew-T/log p diagram. Prefrontal skew-T/log p diagram for FULLTERR (black) and NOSIERRA (gray) at 1800 UTC at locations shown in Fig. 3.5.

18 UTC

Figure 3.10. Trajectory plots. Backward trajectories ending at 2100 UTC (gray arrow labels denote trajectory number; group A = dark blue, group B = light blue, group C = red, group D = yellow, group E = purple), and potential temperature differences at 2100 UTC (FULLTERR–NOSIERRA; contoured every 2 K) for (a) FULLTERR and (b) NOSIERRA.

20

4

8

2

0

0

0

4

4

4

6

-2

20

4

8

2

0

0

0

4

4

4

6

-2

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9 10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17

18 19 20 21

22 23 24 25

26 27 28 29

30 31 32

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9 10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17

18 19 20 21

22 23 24 25

26 27 28 29

30 31 32

Group AGroup BGroup CGroup DGroup E

Group AGroup BGroup CGroup DGroup E

a)

b)

Figure 3.11. Analyses for NORTH at 23 h. (a) Lowest η-level baroclinity [shaded according to scale, K (100 km)-1], potential temperature (contoured every 1 K), and wind vectors (m s-1, according to scale). (b) lowest η-level contraction (shaded according to scale, x10-4 s-1), kinematic frontogenesis [every 1 K (100 km)-1 hr-1 starting at 0.25], and wind vectors [as in (a)]. Fronts denoted using conventional frontal symbols, and airstream boundaries denoted by dotted lines.

a)

b)

15

0.9

0.7

0.5

0.3

2.25

1.75

1.25

0.75

Figure 3.12. Analyses for NORTH at 44 h. As in Fig. 3.11.

a)

b)

Figure 3.13. Analyses for NORTH at 50 h. As in Fig. 3.11.

a)

b)

Figure 3.14. Analyses for CENTRAL at 23 h. As in Fig. 3.11.

a)

b)

Figure 3.15. Analyses for CENTRAL at 36 h. As in Fig. 3.11.

a)

b)

Figure 3.16. Analyses for CENTRAL at 48 h. As in Fig. 3.11.

a)

b)

Figure 3.17. Analyses for SOUTH at 30 h. As in Fig. 3.11.

a)

b)

Figure 3.18. Analyses for SOUTH at 45 h. As in Fig. 3.11.

a)

b)

Figure 3.19. Analyses for SOUTH at 54 h. As in Fig. 3.11.

a)

b)

Old Figs

a) FULLTER 1500 UTC

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10

Figure 4. Simulated radar reflectivity [dBZ, color shaded according to scale in (a)], cloud-top temperature (°C, grey shaded according to scale in (b)], and geopotential height (solid contours every 10 m) for (a) FULLTER at 1500 UTC, (b) NOSIERRA at 1500 UTC, (c) FULLTER at 1800 UTC, (d) NOSIERRA at 1800 UTC, (e) FULLTER at 2100 UTC, and (f) NOSIERRA at 2100 UTC 25 Mar 2006.

b) NOSIERRA 1500 UTC

c) FULLTER 1800 UTC

e) FULLTER 2100 UTC

d) NOSIERRA 1800 UTC

f) NOSIERRA 2100 UTC

Greg-I’ve made some slight adjustments to front/trof positioning here and in subsequent figs

a) FULLTER Contraction 1500 UTC b) NOSIERRA Contraction 1500 UTC

Figure 5. Lowest half-η level contraction [x10-4 s-1, shaded following scale in (a)], potential temperature (thin contours every 2 K), potential temperature gradient [thick contours every 10 K (100 km)-1], and wind vectors [scale in (a)] at 1500 UTC 25 Mar 2006 from (a) FULLTER and (b) NOSIERRA.

Magnitude for potential temperature gradient? Guessing 10K/100 km – checking with Greg

288296

296

288 296

288

20 ms-1

4

3

5

6

2

1

7

8

a) FULLTER Contraction 1800 UTC b) NOSIERRA Contraction 1800 UTC

Figure 7. Same as Fig. 5 except for 1800 UTC 25 Mar 2006.

20 ms-1

4

3

5

6

2

1

7

8

288

296

288 296

a) FULLTER Contraction 2100 UTC b) NOSIERRA Contraction 2100 UTC

20 ms-1

4

3

5

6

2

1

7

8

288

296304

288

296

296

304

Figure 9. Same as Fig. 5 except for 2100 UTC 25 Mar 2006.

a) FULLTER Contraction 0000 UTC b) NOSIERRA Contraction 0000 UTC

20 ms-1

4

3

5

6

2

1

7

8

288

296

304

288

296

304

Figure 11. Same as Fig. 5 except for 0000 UTC 26 Mar 2006.

a) FULLTER Kinematic (Fw) 1500 UTC

c) FULLTER Moist (FM) 1500 UTC

e) FULLTER Boundary Layer (FBL) 1500 UTC

b) NOSIERRA Kinematic (Fw) 1500 UTC

d) NOSIERRA Moist (FM) 1500 UTC

e) NOSIERRA Boundary Layer (FBL) 1500 UTC

Figure 6. Frontogenesis diagnostics at 1500 UTC 25 Mar 2006 with surface features discussed in text annotated. (a) FULLTER lowest half-η level potential temperature (every 2 K), wind (vector scale at left), and kinematic frontogenesis [K (100 km h)−1, shaded following scale at left]. (b) As in (a), but for NOSIERRA. (c) As in (a), but with moist frontogenesis. (d) As in (d) but for NOSIERRA. (e) As in (a) but with boundary layer frontogenesis. (f) As in (e) but for NOSIERRA.

288296

296

288 296

288

288296

296

288 296

288

288296

296

288 296

288

10

-10

30

50

-30

-50

20 ms-1

a) FULLTER Kinematic (Fw) 1800 UTC

c) FULLTER Moist (FM) 1800 UTC

e) FULLTER Boundary Layer (FBL) 1800 UTC

b) NOSIERRA Kinematic (Fw) 1800 UTC

d) NOSIERRA Moist (FM) 1800 UTC

e) NOSIERRA Boundary Layer (FBL) 1800 UTC

Figure 8. Same as Fig. 6 except for 1800 UTC 25 Mar 2006.

10

-10

30

50

-30

-50

20 ms-1

288

296

288 296

288

296

288 296

288

296

288 296

a) FULLTER Kinematic (Fw) 2100 UTC

c) FULLTER Moist (FM) 2100 UTC

e) FULLTER Boundary Layer (FBL) 2100 UTC

b) NOSIERRA Kinematic (Fw) 2100 UTC

d) NOSIERRA Moist (FM) 2100 UTC

e) NOSIERRA Boundary Layer (FBL) 2100 UTC

Figure 10. Same as Fig. 6 except for 2100 UTC 25 Mar 2006.

10

-10

30

50

-30

-50

20 ms-1

288

296304

288

296

296

304

288

296304

288

296

296

304

288

296304

288

296

296

304

a) FULLTER Kinematic (Fw) 0000 UTC

c) FULLTER Moist (FM) 0000 UTC

e) FULLTER Boundary Layer (FBL) 0000 UTC

b) NOSIERRA Kinematic (Fw) 0000 UTC

d) NOSIERRA Moist (FM) 0000 UTC

e) NOSIERRA Boundary Layer (FBL) 0000 UTC

Figure 12. Same as Fig. 6 except for 0000 UTC 26 Mar 2006.

10

-10

30

50

-30

-50

20 ms-1

288

296

304

288

296

304

288

296

304

288

296

304

288

296

304

288

296

304

a) FULLTER Kinematic (Fw) 1500 UTC

c) FULLTER Diabatic (FD) 1500 UTC

b) NOSIERRA Kinematic (Fw) 1500 UTC

d) NOSIERRA Diabatic (FD) 1500 UTC

Figure 6. Frontogenesis diagnostics at 1500 UTC 25 Mar 2006 with surface features discussed in text annotated. (a) FULLTER lowest half-η level potential temperature (every 2 K), wind (vector scale at left), and kinematic frontogenesis [K (100 km h)−1, shaded following scale at left]. (b) As in (a), but for NOSIERRA. (c) As in (a), but with diabatic frontogenesis. (d) As in (d) but for NOSIERRA.

288296

296

288 296

288

10

-10

30

50

-30

-50

20 ms-1

288296

296

288 296

288

a) FULLTER Kinematic (Fw) 1800 UTC b) NOSIERRA Kinematic (Fw) 1800 UTC

Figure 8. Same as Fig. 6 except for 1800 UTC 25 Mar 2006.

10

-10

30

50

-30

-50

20 ms-1

c) FULLTER Diabatic (FD) 1800 UTC d) NOSIERRA Diabatic (FD) 1800 UTC

288

296

288 296

288

296

288 296

a) FULLTER Kinematic (Fw) 2100 UTC b) NOSIERRA Kinematic (Fw) 2100 UTC

Figure X. Same as Fig. X except for 2100 UTC 25 Mar 2006.

10

-10

30

50

-30

-50

20 ms-1

c) FULLTER Diabatic (FD) 2100 UTC d) NOSIERRA Diabatic (FD) 2100 UTC

a) FULLTER Kinematic (Fw) 0000 UTC b) NOSIERRA Kinematic (Fw) 0000 UTC

Figure X. Same as Fig. X except for 0000 UTC 26 Mar 2006.

10

-10

30

50

-30

-50

20 ms-1

c) FULLTER Diabatic (FD) 0000 UTC d) NOSIERRA Diabatic (FD) 0000 UTC

Figs from Greg’sDissertation (not used)

0

500

1000

1500

Might be better to use all black contours and use contour labels?Perhaps we can live with as is.

Figure 1. FULLTER topography (contoured every 500-m from light grey to black) and the FULLTERR-NOSIERRA terrain-height difference (m, shaded according to inset scale)

X

Y

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

X

Y

X

Y

X

Y

-2-12-22-32-42-52 2 12 22 32 42 52

20 ms-1

a) FULLTER 1500 UTC Contraction

c) FULLTER 1500 UTC FD

b) NOSIERRA 1500 UTC Contraction

d) NOSIERRA 1500 UTC FD

Figure 4. (a) Lowest half-η level contraction [x10-4 s-1, shaded according to scale in (a)], baroclinity [dashed contours every 0.5 K (100 km)-1, maxima labeled], kinematic frontogenesis [solid contours every 5 K (100 km)-1 hr-1], and wind vectors [scale in (a)] for FULLTER at 1500 UTC. (b) Same as (a) except for NOSIERRA. (c) Lowest half-η level moist frontogenesis [K (100 km)-1 hr-1, shaded according to scale in (c)], boundary layer frontogenesis [dashed contours every 5 K (100 km) -1 hr-1, , black positive, grey negative], potential temperature (solid contours every 2 K), and wind vectors [as in (a)] for FULLTERR at 1500 UTC. (d) Same as (c) except for NOSIERRA. Surface fronts annotated using conventional frontal symbols, 850-hPa troughs with dashed lines, lowest half-η level airstream boundaries with dotted lines and cross section XY with orange line.

Shading here is different than mineGreg used a cint of 5 instead of 4

Figure 3.4. Mesoscale frontogenesis diagnostics. Lowest η-level contraction [shaded according to scale in (a), x10-4 s-1], baroclinity [dashed contours, every 0.5 K (100 km)-1, maxima labeled], kinematic frontogenesis [solid contours, every 5 K (100 km)-1 hr-1], and wind vectors [according to scale in (a), m s-1] for (a) FULLTERR and (b) NOSIERRA at 1500 UTC. Lowest η-level moist frontogenesis [shaded according to scale in (c), K (100 km)-1 hr-1], boundary layer frontogenesis [dashed contours, black positive, grey negative, every 5 K (100 km)-1 hr-1], potential temperature (solid contours every 2 K), and wind vectors [as in (a)] for (c) FULLTERR and (d) NOSIERRA at hour 15. Surface fronts are annotated using conventional frontal symbols, 850-hPa troughs using dashed lines, and lowest η-level airstream boundaries using dotted lines. Cross section (Fig. 3.8) position XY also shown.

a) 15 UTC - FULLTERR - Cont., Baro., Kin. Frg.

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

025

b) 15 UTC - NOSIERRA - Cont., Baro., Kin. Frg.

d) 15 UTC - NOSIERRA - Diabatic Frg.c) 15 UTC - FULLTERR - Diabatic Frg.

60 30 10 -2 2 10 30 60

X

Y

X

Y

X

Y

X

Y

Figure 3.5. Mesoscale frontogenesis diagnostics. As in Fig. 3.4 but at 1800 UTC. Position of 1800 UTC sounding (Fig. 3.10) also shown.

b) 18 UTC - NOSIERRA - Cont., Baro., Kin. Frg.

d) 18 UTC - NOSIERRA - Diabatic Frg.c) 18 UTC - FULLTERR - Diabatic Frg.

a) 18 UTC - FULLTERR - Cont., Baro., Kin. Frg.

18 UTCSounding

18 UTCSounding

18 UTCSounding

18 UTCSounding

Figure 3.6. Mesoscale frontogenesis diagnostics. As in Fig. 3.4 but at 2100 UTC.

b) 21 UTC - NOSIERRA - Cont., Baro., Kin. Frg.

d) 21 UTC - NOSIERRA - Diabatic Frg.

a) 21 UTC - FULLTERR - Cont., Baro., Kin. Frg.

c) 21 UTC - FULLTERR - Diabatic Frg.

Figure 3.7. Mesoscale frontogenesis diagnostics. As in Fig. 3.4 but at 0000 UTC 26 Mar.

c) 00 UTC - FULLTERR - Diabatic Frg.

a) 00 UTC - FULLTERR - Cont., Baro., Kin. Frg.

b) 00 UTC - NOSIERRA - Cont., Baro., Kin. Frg.

d) 00 UTC - NOSIERRA - DiabaticFrg.