4185 4185 scale of measurement,reliability&validity
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
1/25
Observation, Theorizing and Mathematical
Model building necessitates knowledge on
a) Concept, construct and variables
b) Measurement or quantification ofvariables
c) Reliability and validity relating to the
measurement of variables and
specification of relationships between
them.
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
2/25
An Introduction to the Scale of
Measurement
Measurement is assigning numbers to
observations in such a way that the
numbers are amenable for analysis.
The number represents the property being
studied.
There are four scale of measurement viz;
Nominal, Ordinal, Interval and Ratio scale
of measurement.
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
3/25
1.Nominal Scale
The operation is partitioning the objects, persons
or characteristics in to mutually exclusive sub
classes and the relation between the members
of the class is equivalence (=).Classifying a group of persons into male and
female and assigning numbers as 0 and 1.
Automobile license plate numbers are other
examples.
Numbers only denote do not connote.
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
4/25
2.Ordinal Scale
Objects of one category are not different( as
measured in nominal scale) but they stand in
some kind of relation amongst them. < or > ,=
We rank objects/ statements by giving countingnumbers.
These numbers are not isomorphic to the
system of arithmetic. The successive difference
are not same.
Expl : Ranking of individuals,Exam results:
passed in 1st,2nd or 3rd class.etc
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
5/25
Likert Scale numbers are often considered as
measured in ordinal scale
Listed below are some of the services that
may influence the choice of a bank.
Please rate the following in a 5 point scale
1- Least Important
5- Most important
(A 7 point scale could be used)
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
6/25
Example 2 (Contd)
Services 1 2 3 4 5
1.
Courteous
service
2.Compete
nce of staff
3.Fast
action on
complaints
5.No of
branches
6.Availabilit
y of ATM
services
7.Financial
strength ofthe bank
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
7/25
3.Interval Scale
An interval scale is characterized by a
common and constant unit of
measurement, but with an arbitrary zero.
Consider the measurement of temperature
in two scales e.g. F & C
The two scale conform to the linear
transformation such as
F = 9/5 C + 32
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
8/25
Two points to observe
1. Zero points in the two scale are arbitrary.
2.The ratio of difference between reading on one
scale is equal to that of the other scale. But the
ratio of scale value is not equal due to thearbitrary zero.
E.g. Cen 0 10 30 100
Fer 32 50 86 21230-10/10-0 = 86-50/50-32 = 2
But 0 : 32 # 10:50 # 30: 86 # 100 : 212
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
9/25
4.Ratio Scale
A Ratio Scale of Measurement has all the
characteristics of interval scale with true
zero point at its origin.
This scale is isomorphic to the system of
arithmetic (with a true zero).
It has known ratio of any two interval and
known ratio of any scale value
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
10/25
Consider the following.
Measurement of area is done with acre or
hectare which are in ratio scale.
Area in Ha 2 4 6 8 10
Area in acre 5 10 15 20 25
Known ratio of difference
6-4/ 4-2 = 15 - 10/ 10 - 5 = 1Known ratio of scale value
2:5 = 4:10 = 6:15
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
11/25
Scale of Measurement and Statistical
analysis
The numbers assigned by nominal and ordinal
scale are not amenable for some statistical tools.
These two are know as non-metric scale of
measurement where as interval and ratio scalesare known as metric scale of measurement.
Numbers measured in metric scale are
amenable for statistical tools and are used in
mathematical models.
However, all the scale of measurement
are used in social science
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
12/25
Sources of error in measurement.(With special reference to social research/survey)
Instrument: The Techniques especially for the
qualitative variables (Proxy variables) along with
inadequate sampling, inadequate response
choice, ambiguous questions etc in surveys.Respondent: His psychological state, physical
condition, awareness, time etc.
Situation: Presence of people, unsureanonymity, and other situational factors.
Measurer: His behavior, style, noting down
observation, incorrect coding, faulty calculation.
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
13/25
Reliability and Validity
After assigning numbers to the
objects/events, properties according to
rules the researcher asks to questions.
1. What is the reliability of the measuring
instrument?
2.What is its validity?
These two are important since thenumbers represent the phenomena under
study.
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
14/25
Reliability
Reliability in the context of measurement is
based on the probability of errors.
Reliability implies: If the same object or property
is measured again and again with the samemeasuring instrument we get similar result.
To the extent that the errors are present in a
measuring instrument, to that extent the
instrument is unreliable.
Thus, reliability is the relative absence of error of
measurement in a measuring instrument.
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
15/25
Reliability and Errors
Two types of errors: Systematic & Random
Systematic error results in biased measurement
but random errors are self compensating.
Measuring qualitative and quantitative variables.
Consider the following variables:
- Brand loyalty, industrialization, economic status
-Mass, weight, income, profit, revenueThe probability of error is likely to be more in
qualitative variables used in social research.
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
16/25
Reliability Measures
A Measure of reliability is the proportion of the
"true" variance to the total obtained variance of
the data yielded by a measuring instrument.
Alternatively it is the proportion of the errorvariance to the total obtained variance yielded
by a measuring instrument subtracted from the
index of "One".
E.g. 1. R 2 = ESS/TSS or 1- RSS/TSS
Cronbach's Alpha - Measures dimension.
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
17/25
Validity
Validity concerns an enquiry in to the reality of a
variable and theoretical consistency.
Consider the following two sets of varables
1. Gender, Domicile, Length, Weight, income etc.
2.Personality,Brand preference, loyalty, awareness
For the former there are specific measures, but for
the later there are indirect ways to measure.A measurement may be reliable but may not
have validity.
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
18/25
Types of Vilidity
Researchers refer to three types of validity
Viz Content, Criterion & Construct validity
a ) Content validity
It is the extent to which a measuring
instrument provides adequate coverage of
the concept/topic/ entities.
E.g a representative sample in a sample study,a proxy variable representing a qualitative
variable
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
19/25
Criterion related Validity
Mostly used in empirical research.
It relates to the predictive efficiency of an
instrument.
Consider the following examples.
1. Specification of variables: Investment potential
could be estimated/predicted by composition of
income group or MPS of groups of people ?
2. Types of specification of a model: linear, non-
linear, etc using a time series )
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
20/25
Criterion validity.
It relates to efficiency in estimationand prediction.
Estimation and prediction could be
with the use of differentspecification or the use of different
statistical models or relationships.
The model having least error issupposed to have criterion validity.
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
21/25
Construct Validity
It is more complex, subjective & abstractand unites psychometric notions with
theoretical notions.
It is not only validating the relationship,
but one must try to validate the theorybehind it e.g. in a dependency relationship
Y and a few X s are related and the
researcher asks why such a relationshipmay exit?
A Prior i Reasoninghas to be given which
concerns theory, judgment & articulation.
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
22/25
A priori reasoning.
Consider the following
# Two Variables Case:
i) Demand = f (Price)
ii) Demand of X = f (Adv. Expenditure)iii) Rate of Capital Formation = f (Savings)
iv) Stock Prices = f (EPS)
v) Productivity = f (Mandays lost due to strike)
vi) Agricultural Production = f (Area under cultivation)
vii) Production of Paddy = f (% of area irrigated)
viii) Price of crop = f (Production)
Contd..
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
23/25
A priori reasoning.
# More than two variables
(i) Demand of X = f (Price of X, Price of Substitute, Adv.
Expenditure)
(ii) Income Tax Rev. of
GoI
= (PCI, Literacy Rate, Industrialization)
(iii) Agricultural
Production
= f (Area under cultivation, % of area
irrigated, fertilizer use)
(iv) Production of a
group of small scale
industries
= f (Working Capital, Proximity to
market, Ratio of Number of Technical
Persons/Total Employees)
(v) Index of Industrial
Production
= f (Expenditure in R & D, Employment
in Organised Sector)
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
24/25
Construct validity is addressed with
respect to the following
Specification of proxy variables or
quantification of qualitative variables.
Specification of relationship betweendependent and independent variables
(proper articulation with valid logic)
Specification of functional forms e.g.Linear, Quadratic, multiplicative,
logarithmic etc.
-
7/27/2019 4185 4185 Scale of Measurement,Reliability&Validity
25/25
The following may be considered to
achieve construct validity
Whether the researcher is near the
property being measured while specifying
proxy variables.
Redundant relationship may not be
worked out ( with no a priori reasoning)
Far off relationship may be avoided.