33136 eval forms en

EVALUATION FORMS

Information and Communication Technologies

ICT

FP7-ICT-2013-11

FP7-ICT-2013-11 Evaluations forms

18/09/12 v1

2

The following forms exemplify those which will be issued to independent experts employed as evaluators in the evaluation of proposals received in

ICT Call 11 (FP7-ICT-2013-11) In this call there will be strong competition. Therefore, edit your proposal tightly, strengthen or eliminate weak points. Put yourself in the place of an expert evaluator; refer to the evaluation criteria and procedure given in annex 2 of the Guide for Applicants. Arrange for your draft to be evaluated by experienced colleagues; use their advice to improve it before submission.

CONTENTS

EVALUATION REPORT FOR AN INTEGRATED PROJECT ............................................................ 3 EVALUATION REPORT FOR A STREP .................................................................................... 5 EVALUATION REPORT FOR A COORDINATION ACTION OR ERANET PLUS ACTION .................... 7 EVALUATION REPORT FOR A SUPPORT ACTION ..................................................................... 9 EVALUATION REPORT FOR A CP-CSA PROPOSAL IN PRE-COMMERCIAL PROCUREMENT .........11 EVALUATION REPORT FOR AN ERANET ACTION IMPLEMENTED AS A COORDINATION ACTION IN

FET FLAGSHIPS .................................................................................................................13

0 The proposal fails to address the criterion under examination or cannot be judged due to missing or incomplete

information; 1 Poor The criterion is addressed in an inadequate manner, or there are serious inherent weaknesses; 2 Fair

While the proposal broadly addresses the criterion, there are significant weaknesses; 3 Good The proposal addresses the

criterion well, although improvements would be necessary; 4 Very good The proposal addresses the criterion very well,

although certain improvements are still possible; 5 Excellent The proposal successfully addresses all relevant aspects of the

criterion in question. Any shortcomings are minor.

3

ICT Theme IER

Evaluation Report for an Integrated Project

Proposal No. : Acronym :

1. Scientific and/or technological excellence (relevant to the topics addressed by the call)

Soundness of concept, and quality of objectives

Progress beyond the state-of-the-art

Quality and effectiveness of the S/T methodology and associated work plan

Score: (Threshold 3/5; Weight 1)

2. Quality and efficiency of the implementation and the management

Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures

Quality and relevant experience of the individual participants

Quality of the consortium as a whole (including complementarity, balance)

Appropriateness of the allocation and justification of the resources to be committed (budget, staff, equipment)








4

Evaluation Report for an Integrated Project p.2 3. Potential impact through the development, dissemination and use of project results Contribution, at the European and/or international level, to the expected impacts listed in the

work programme under relevant topic/activity

Appropriateness of measures for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and management of intellectual property.


Remarks

Overall score: (Threshold 10/15)

Does this proposal contain ethical issues that may need further attention ? NO YES

I declare that, to the best of my knowledge, I have no direct or indirect conflict of interest in the evaluation of this proposal

Name

Signature

Date







5

ICT Theme IER

Evaluation Report for a STREP




Progress beyond the state-of-the-art

Quality and effectiveness of the S/T methodology and associated work plan


2. Quality and efficiency of the implementation and the management

Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures











6

Evaluation Report for a STREP p.2 3. Potential impact through the development, dissemination and use of project results Contribution, at the European and/or international level, to the expected impacts listed in the


Appropriateness of measures for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and management of intellectual property.


Remarks




Name

Signature

Date







7

ICT Theme IER

Evaluation Report for a Coordination Action or ERANET Plus action


1. Scientific and/or technological excellence (relevant to the topics addressed by the

call)


Contribution to the coordination of high quality research

Quality and effectiveness of the coordination mechanisms and associated work plan


2. Quality and efficiency of the implementation and the management Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures











8

Evaluation Report for a Coordination Action or ERANET Plus action p.2 3. Potential impact through the development, dissemination and use of project results Contribution, at the European and/or international level, to the expected impacts listed in the


Appropriateness of measures for spreading excellence, exploiting results and disseminating knowledge through engagement with stakeholders and the public at large


Remarks




Name

Signature

Date







9

ICT Theme IER

Evaluation Report for a Support Action




Quality and effectiveness of the support mechanisms and associated work plan


2. Quality and efficiency of the implementation and the management Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures


Quality of the consortium as a whole (including complementarity, balance) [only if relevant]









10

Evaluation Report for a Support Action p.2 3. Potential impact through the development, dissemination and use of project results Contribution, at the European and/or international level, to the expected impacts listed in the


Appropriateness of measures for spreading excellence, exploiting results and disseminating knowledge through engagement with stakeholders and the public at large


Remarks




Name

Signature

Date







11

ICT Theme IER

Evaluation Report for a CP-CSA proposal in Pre-commercial Procurement



call)

Soundness of concept and quality of objectives.

Progress beyond the state-of-the-art (relevant only to CP part of the proposal).

Contribution to the coordination of high quality research (relevant only to CSA part of the proposal).

Quality and effectiveness of the CSA mechanisms (mechanisms proposed to achieve the objectives of the networking and coordination CSA part of the project), and associated work plan

Quality and effectiveness of the S/T methodology and associated work plan (relevant only to CP part of the proposal).


2. Quality and efficiency of the implementation and the management Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures.

Quality and relevant experience of the individual participants.

Quality of the consortium as a whole (including complementarity, balance).

Appropriate allocation and justification of the resources to be committed (staff, equipment …).








12

Evaluation Report for a CP-CSA in PCP p.2 3. Potential impact through the development, dissemination and use of project results Contribution at the European level, to the expected impacts listed in the work programme

under relevant topic/activity.

Appropriateness of measures for the exploitation of project results, dissemination of knowledge, through the engagement with stakeholders and the public at large, and the management of intellectual property and for spreading excellence


Remarks




Name

Signature

Date







13

ICT Theme IER

Evaluation Report for an ERANET action implemented as a Coordination Action in FET Flagships



call)

Clarity of objectives

Contribution to the coordination of high-risk and high -impact research, for new or emerging areas or horizontally

Quality and effectiveness of the coordination activities

Score: (Threshold 3/5; Weight 40%)

2. Quality and efficiency of the implementation and the management Quality of workplan and management


Quality of the consortium

Appropriate management of the resources to be committed (person months, equipment, budget)








14

Evaluation Report for an ERANET Coordination Action in FET Proactive p.2 3. Potential impact through the development, dissemination and use of project results Transformational impact on the communities and/or practices for high-risk and high impact

research

Appropriateness of measures for spreading excellence, use of results and dissemination of knowledge, including engagement with stakeholders


Remarks

Overall score:



Name

Signature

Date

33136 eval forms en

Business

expected impacts listed

proposal broadly addresses

proposal successfully addresses

individual participants quality

eranet action implemented

proposal addresses thecriterion

relevant topic activity appropriateness

proposal addresses