3. framing the choice in eu referendums

17
Framing the Choice in EU Referendums Ece Ozlem Atikcan Assistant Professor Politics and International Studies Warwick University 1

Upload: robert-schuman-centre

Post on 13-Apr-2017

136 views

Category:

Presentations & Public Speaking


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 3. Framing the Choice in EU Referendums

Framing the Choice in EU Referendums

Ece Ozlem AtikcanAssistant Professor

Politics and International StudiesWarwick University

1

Page 2: 3. Framing the Choice in EU Referendums

2

Framing the European Union: The Power of Political Arguments in Shaping European Integration (Cambridge University Press, 2015)

Page 3: 3. Framing the Choice in EU Referendums

European Union referendums

3

Page 4: 3. Framing the Choice in EU Referendums

4

Page 5: 3. Framing the Choice in EU Referendums

Understanding EU referendums: Alternative explanations

Second-order theoryVoting based on national issues

Attitude/Issue-voting theoryVoting in line with underlying attitudes towards European integration

5

Page 6: 3. Framing the Choice in EU Referendums

6

Page 7: 3. Framing the Choice in EU Referendums

7

Page 8: 3. Framing the Choice in EU Referendums

The puzzle

Why did the initially high levels of public support for the EU treaties melt away in three of the six cases but not in others?

8

Page 9: 3. Framing the Choice in EU Referendums

The central argument of my book

Strong No campaign arguments built a connection between the referendum proposal and existing contentious issues (at both the domestic and EU levels), claiming that these problems were caused or would be exacerbated by the proposed European treaty.

The existing contention remained unlinked to the referendum proposal in the absence of strong No campaign arguments.

Framing the European Union: The Power of Political Arguments in Shaping European Integration

(Cambridge University Press, 2015)

9

Page 10: 3. Framing the Choice in EU Referendums

Campaign Framing in Referendums

Framing theory The way an issue is presented can produce dramatic differences in

public opinion. (Chong and Druckman, 2007)

What makes framing successful? availability, accessibility, applicability of frames vivid, concrete, image-provoking, emotionally compelling frames frames containing negative information

10

Page 11: 3. Framing the Choice in EU Referendums

11

Page 12: 3. Framing the Choice in EU Referendums

12

Page 13: 3. Framing the Choice in EU Referendums

Methodology

Three steps to analyze campaigns:

Interviews with campaigners and EU officials(Field work in 2008 and 2011, 140 face-to-face interviews)

Media content analysis(Berganza, Capdevila, Gómez Puertas, Royal Elcano Institute study; Gerstlé, Schuck de Vreese; Kleinnijenhuis, Takens and van Atteveldt)

Public opinion data(Center of Sociological Investigations (CIS), Real Instituto Elcano, Advice on Survey Analysis (CSA), IPSOS, French Institute of Public Opinion (SOFRES), French Institute of Public Opinion (IFOP), Marketresponse, Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (CPB), Netherlands Institute for Social Research (SCP), Luxembourg Institute for Social Research (TNS-ILRES), Millward Brown.)

13

Page 14: 3. Framing the Choice in EU Referendums

14

Page 15: 3. Framing the Choice in EU Referendums

15

Page 16: 3. Framing the Choice in EU Referendums

16

Page 17: 3. Framing the Choice in EU Referendums

Implications

Given the EU’s complex architecture and distance from the citizens, a lot depends on how national politicians present it to their constituencies.

Not to trust early opinion polls!

Culture versus economy: Are cultural arguments easier to frame vividly?

Why are pro-EU campaigners not better at campaigning?

17