2b - background to the tree and soil study investigations ... · soil & trees “we know more...
TRANSCRIPT
Background to the tree and soil study investigations
Soil & Trees
“We know more about the movement of celestial bodies than about the soil underfoot”
Leonardo da Vinci
Lots of tree health issues
Oak decline
Phytophthora sp.
Forest declines – global
Virulent new pathogens – biosecurity Ash die-back
Most appear linked to water and/or soil
Oak decline of particular concern
AOD distribution: 1997-99 episode
AOD distribution: 2006 – 2016 episode
- Acute oak decline (AOD)
Crown morphology & oak decline
Are there clues to a key factor underlying the condition in the pattern of crown break up?
Loss of lateral shoots/bud – first sign of decline
• Indicating a link to water? • Hydraulic limitation or hormonally mediated
• All points towards water Root function and soil
Yoder (1997); Rust & Roloff (2002) [hydraulic limitation]
Royal Parks study – Acute Oak Decline (AOD)
2009 started preparing for Royal Parks study
Investigate link with soil biology, chemistry and structure
Apply novel biological treatments
ACT crown application ACT ground application Woodchip mulch Control
Introduce expert arboricultural observation into study
Other TEPr studies:
Massaria disease of plane
1. Kensington Gardens (Royal Parks), London – since 2013 2. Islington Borough Council, London – since 2011
Oak decline – in conjunction with Natural England and landowners
1. Burghley House, Stamford – since 2013 2. Eastnor Castle Estate SSSI, Herefordshire – since 2017 3. Moccas Park SSSI, Herefordshire – since 2018 4. Brampton Bryan SSSI, Herefordshire – since 2018
Ink stain disease of chestnut (Phytophthora cinnamomi)
1. Greenwich Park (Royal Parks), London – since 2017
Independent study – Oak decline, Guildford Borough Council
Back over to Simon
Oak decline crown condition scoring system
Crown density (Innes system) 20 point scale
Drought stress crown indicators – Dead twigs in canopy
– Small branch mortality
Crown Integrity - Breakup – fragmentation
Leaf health & condition & size: green – chlorotic
Number of previous decline episodes
Notes on crown decline morphotype
Results Royal Parks study
Interpretation of results
Highly significant effect - P<0.01
Foliar ACT (green) Instant effect
Effect on rhizosphere microbiome
Woodchip mulch (purple) Similar microbiome to ACT
Increase organic matter
Needed re-applying
Ground ACT (blue) Similar overall magnitude of effect
Slower acting
Control (red) Episodic nature of oak decline
Timing of study - context
Control of oak mildew Induced resistance
Microbiostasis
Foliar feeding - absorption of micronutrients & humic acids
Re-introduction of longer distance exploration mycorrhizal morphotypes
Micorrhizing bacteria
Ameliorated tree microbiome Improved plant growth processes & vigour
Improved stress resilience
Compost tea application with oak – what might results be showing?
Oak decline – analysing crown decline morphology Drobyshev et al, 2006 - Temporal Mortality Pattern of Pedunculate Oaks in Southern Sweden
Dendrochronological analysis of dead, declining and healthy trees
Identified two different dendrochronological phenotypes
Observations of crown decline morphology during TEPr and GBC oak decline studies
Two broad decline morphotypes that confirm Drobyshev’s phenotypes
Confirmed by tree ring analysis
De afbeelding kan momenteel niet worden weergegeven.
‘Episodic’ (boom & bust) decline phenotype
‘Slow & steady’ decline phenotype
Royal Parks Study
Differential response of different decline phenotypes to treatments
ACT use helped gain a better understanding of the nature of decline with different decline phenotypes
‘Episodic’ (boom & bust) Larger leaves
Tendency towards longer shoot extension growth
Sudden ‘slow downs’ in growth and peripheral shoot die-back
Increased incidence leaf chlorosis during decline phase
Noticeable cycles of decline and recovery
‘Slow and Steady’ Small, leathery leaves
Bunched growth
Reduced vigour – slow growth
Drought adaptations?
Characteristics of two different decline morphotypes
Bunched growth – recovering oak treated with woodchip mulch at Burghley house