28046767 calorific values and proximate analysis of

Upload: erik-weeks

Post on 04-Jun-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 28046767 Calorific Values and Proximate Analysis Of

    1/13

    Calorific Values and Proximate Analysis of

    Sargassum spp.and Ulva spp.

    Carlo S. Alburo, Radzwell H. Conje, Maria racelda !. Pino,

    "n#r. Patric$ %. &an'

    Department of Chemical Engineering, University of San Carlos, 6000 Cebu City, Philippines

    *Corresponding uthor!

    Abstract

    The potential of seaweeds, Sargassum spp" and Ulva spp., as biomass for energy production wasinvestigated based on their calorific values. Further, calorific values were correlated with the proximate

    analysis, which covers moisture, ash, volatile matter and fixed carbon contents of the seaweeds, using

    multiple linear regression. The calorific value was measured using bomb calorimetry while the proximate

    analysis was conducted using gravimetric method. The seaweed samples were taken from three different

    spots in Mactan Island, namely, Cordova, uaya, and Maribago. It was found that the calorific values of

    Sargassum spp"range from !"#$.%& k'(kg to &%#"".") k'(kg while Ulva spp"have a mean calorific value

    of &*"++."&k'(kg on dry basis. This shows that the seaweeds have comparable calorific values with those

    of the conventional biomass fuels like bagasse, rice husks and corn cobs. Correlation between calorific

    values and proximate analysis was finally established in this study as

    with -% ).!).

    #ey$ords! Calorific %alues, Pro&imate nalysis, Sea$eeds, 'ultiple (inear Correlations

    (. )ntroduction

    )")" Sea$eeds as iofuels

    The /hilippines has an abundant supply of biomass resources which include agricultural crops 0rice

    hulls, coconut husk and meat, cocoa, cassava and bagasse1, saw mill 0forest logs1 and furniture residues0sawn timber1. ut these biomass resources readily compete with food production and agricultural land

    2&3. To address these constraints, a potentially viable alternative is to use a4uatic biomass, such as algae,

    as the feedstock for second5generation biofuel and bioenergy production.

    /age (of (*

    67C Chemical 8ngineering 7tudent -esearch 9nnual %)&)

  • 8/13/2019 28046767 Calorific Values and Proximate Analysis Of

    2/13

    6sing macroalgae 0or seaweeds1 as biofuel has the advantage of higher growth rates compared to

    terrestrial crops and and avoids competing with the agricultural land. Moreover, seaweeds can mitigate

    greenhouse gases emission since C:%from flue gas can be utili;ed as carbon source in algae growth.

    9side from that, wastewater can be used to provide nutrients for seaweed growth 2%3.

    /ast attempts in utili;ing seaweed as source of fuel started in +)elp /rogram of 6nited 7tates used the brown

    seaweed 'acrocystis pyrifera as energy crop. ?owever the program was discontinued when it was

    thought that the crisis was over 2*3. ut with the serious problems posed by global warming and the rapid

    depletion of oil reserves today, the use of a4uatic biomass energy is now being reconsidered as a means of

    C:%mitigation. /rocesses that are now considered for energy generation from a4uatic biomass include

    direct combustion, anaerobic digestion, fermentation to alcohol, thermal li4uefaction, thermal

    gasification, and pyrolysis 2"3. In =ermany, studies are ongoing for the closed cycle 7olar :xygen Fuel

    Turbine 07:FT1 in which dried seaweeds 0specifically Ulva spp"1 are combusted in a fluidi;ed bed boiler

    in -ankine cycle and the combusted products are returned to the cultivation ponds as algae nutrients

    source 2$3. 9ccording toruton et al"2@3,in France, annual green tides generate about @),))) tons of wet

    Ulva spp, 0or !,))) tons dry weight1 which have been considered to be utili;ed for local energy

    production.

    7eaweed species suitable for biomass energy should display high productivity in terms of standing

    crop and biomass yield. The species should be easily cultivated and harvested. 9lso, chemical

    composition of seaweeds should be accounted since it determines the fuel 4uality and dictates the process

    of energy production 2"3. 7eaweeds that are considered as potential energy crops include 'acrocystis

    pyrifera, (aminaria, Sargassum andUlva2@,",*3. These seaweeds are said to have high productivity and

    biomass yield.

    9mong the five species mentioned above, Sargassum and Ulvaspecies are chosen in this study

    because of their local abundance and little economic value" Sargassumis a dominant genus in tropical and

    subtropical waters in terms of standing crop, percent cover and height.

    Ulvaspecies are common in the intertidal ;ones of the /hilippines, but, at certain times, could over5

    proliferate, producing blooms or Agreen tide< in some protected bays. Common Ulva species that

    proliferate in Cebu province are Ulva lactuca, Ulva fasciata and Ulva reticulata2+3. In Mactan Island

    0Cebu1, central /hilippines, at least two species constitute the Ulvapopulation, either as free5living or

    /age +of (*

  • 8/13/2019 28046767 Calorific Values and Proximate Analysis Of

    3/13

    attached form. Ulva lactucamainly consists of free5living population while the species referred to as

    Ulva reticulataconsists mainly of attached population 2+3 " Ulva species are fre4uently found in nutrient5

    rich saline waters, attached to the bottom of the waters 2!3.

    )"+ he Calorific %alues

    =ood knowledge of the heating or calorific value of a fuel and its ash compositions is needed for

    control of ash5related conditions such as slagging, fouling, or erosion, management of environmental

    emissions, heat rate calculations, and modifying operating parameters 2#,&)3. The calorific value of a

    material is the amount of heat released by a material during combustion. It is affected by the ash and

    moisture contents of the biomass. The net calorific value or lower heating value is defined as the heat to

    be removed from the reaction products to obtain a final temperature e4ual to the initial temperature of the

    reactants, assuming that the reaction products remain in gaseous phase, i.e. that the heat of condensation

    of water is not available. :n the other hand, the reference state of the water for the gross calorific value

    0higher heating value1 is li4uid state.

    The ash 0inorganic1 content of a fuel lowers down the calorific value and may cause maBor problems at

    high temperature combustion 0melting of ash and clogging of reactors1 2#,&)3. eber and Dygarlicke 2&)3

    reported that ash5related problems, including slagging, agglomeration, corrosion, and erosion, can cause

    fre4uent unscheduled shutdowns, decreasing the availability and reliability of the energy source.

    The calorific value decreases with increasing moisture content. The presence of moisture in fuel lowers

    its effective heating value since a portion of the heat of combustion is utili;ed in evaporating the

    contained moisture, hence decreasing the calorific value. It is highly desirable, therefore, that the moisture

    content be kept as low as possible 2#3.

    The fixed carbon also affects the heating value of the fuel in such a way that the higher the fixed

    carbon, the higher the thermal value of fuel. In general, an increase in the ash content corresponds to a

    decrease in the fixed carbon content and hence a decrease in heating value 2&&3. Table & shows the

    heating values of commonly used biomass fuels.

    /age *of (*

  • 8/13/2019 28046767 Calorific Values and Proximate Analysis Of

    4/13

    &able (. &yical c-aracteristics of different biomass fuels used commercially for ener#y #eneration

    &ye Calorific Value M/0$#1 2 moisture 2 as-

    Fruit 7tems2&3 $ @* 5

    :il5palm husks2*3 +5! $$ $

    :il5palm fibers2*3

    +5! $$ &)agasse2&3 +.+5! ")5@) &.+5*.!

    Fibers2&3 && ") 5Phaeophyta2%3 #5&& 5 %$5"$

    Chlorophyta2%3 !5&* 5 %"5")

    -ice husks2&3 &" #

    Mai;e Cobs2&3 &*5&$ &)5%) %Coffee husks2&3 &@ &) ).@

    Cocoa husks2&3 &*5&@ +5# +5&"

    =roundnut shells2*3 &@.+ *5&) "5&"

    ood2&3 !."5&+ &)5@) ).%$5&.+

    Coconut shell2&3 &! ! "

    heat straw and husk2*3 &+5 +5&$ !5#

    7witch grass2*3 &!5%) !5&$ @

    Charcoal 2&3 %$5*% &5&) ).$5@

    Eery few studies have been done to establish the calorific values of seaweeds, much less those of

    endemic seaweeds in the /hilippines. 9t the international level, amare and ing 2&%3 reported the

    calorific values of %! species in Gew Dealand. Their report showed that for the macroalgae species, the

    calorific value varies from species to species depending on the type of storage products that range from

    high5energy polysaccharide starch to mannitol and glycerol. The constituents that contribute to the

    calorific value of the seaweeds are carbohydrates, proteins and fats, which are all found to differ from

    species to species. It was reported that Chlorophyta 0green algae1, -hodophyta 0red algae1 and

    /haeophyta 0brown algae1 have different calorific values with Chlorophyta having the highest mean

    calorific content and the -hodophyta having the lowest as shown in Table &. In a similar study, ittler

    and Murray 2&*3 reported that Chlorophyta had the highest average ash5free calorific content followed by

    -hodophyta and lastly /haeophyta.

    )"- he Calorific %alue Determination

    The calorific value can be determined using proximate analysis or adiabatic calorimetry 2&"3.?owever, obtaining data from bomb calorimetry is usually tedious and expensive. For that reason several

    correlations are devised to predict the higher heating value from the proximate analysis data. /arikh et al"

    2&$3 used "$) different types of biomass and presented the correlation

    ??E ).*$*@FC H ).&$$#EM ).))+!97? 284uation &3

    /age 3of (*

  • 8/13/2019 28046767 Calorific Values and Proximate Analysis Of

    5/13

    where ??E is the higher heating value in M'(kg, FC is the fixed carbon content, EM is the volatile

    matter content and 97? is the ash content of the sample content in weight J on dry basis.

    Kemirbas 2&@3 calculated the calorific values 0higher heating values, ??E1 of &@ biomass samples

    experimentally from both ultimate and proximate analyses. The ??E 0M' kgL&1 of the biomass samples

    as a function of fixed carbon was calculated from the following e4uation

    ??E 0M'(kg1 ).@0FC1 H &".& 0-%).###+1 284uation %3

    7heng et al" 2&+3 gave new correlation between the ??E and dry ash content of biomass 0in weight

    percent1 as follows

    ??E 0M'(kg1 .#&").%*%" 97? 284uation *3

    amare and ing 0%))&1

    The maBor advantage of these correlations is that they allow the determination of ??E of fuels simply

    from their proximate analysis and thereby provide a useful tool for modelling of combustion processes.

    These can also be used in examining old(new data for probable errors when experimental results lie much

    outside the predicted results of ??E 2&$3.

    This study sought to explore the possibility of using locally available seaweeds as biomass fuel by

    pitting its heating values against those of the conventional biomass outlined in table &. The study also

    sought to establish relation between heating values and moisture contents of the seaweeds while being

    sun5dried and finally correlations between heating values and the proximate analyses were established for

    Ulva and Sargassumspecies.

    +. Materials and Met-ods

    +") Sampling

    9lgal samples were taken from different areas around Mactan Island. The places chosen were

    dependent primarily on the abundance of seaweeds in one particular place. :rti; and Trono 2&!3 reported

    that +% species of Sargassumare found in the /hilippines. Table % gives the standing crop of Sargassum

    beds in Central Eisayas.

    /age 4of (*

  • 8/13/2019 28046767 Calorific Values and Proximate Analysis Of

    6/13

    &able +. Standin# cro of dominantSargassum spp.in Central Visayas 5(67

    7ite 7tanding Crop0kg wet weight per m% 1

    Kominant Sargassumspecies

    Tongo, Mactan Is. %.$ S" sili.uosum

    Cordova, Mactan Is. *." S" binderi

    Maribago, Mactan Is. %.+ S" polycystum, S" oligocystum

    Caubyan Is. ".# S" polycystum

    KanaBon -eef @.+ S" polycystum

    ilangbilangan Is. %.@ S" polycystum, S" oligocystum

    :lango Is. &.%! S" polycystum, S" oligocystumandS" sili.uosum

    In this study, Sargassum polycystumseaweeds were taken from the shores of arangay uagsong,

    Cordova while Ulva lactucawas taken from arangay uaya. oth Sargassum oligocystum and Ulvareticulatawere taken from the shores of Maribago. The seaweeds were collected during low tides. :ne

    liter of seawater samples was also taken during the collection of the species to determine its K:, p?,

    temperature and salinity.

    The seaweeds were collected by thallus. Three thalli were collected for Sargassum polycystum,

    Sargassum oligocystum andUlva lactuca. The thalli would serve as the samples of each species. There

    were three samples for each kind of species. 9nd since Ulva reticulata thrive in continuous mats, this

    species was obtained by composite sampling. The collection of seaweeds was done by hand. 7pecimens

    adhering to the seaweeds were removed using knife and the collected species were wrapped in anewspaper and placed in an ice bucket.

    ater samples were analy;ed within %" hours after they were collected. p? was determined using the

    p? meter and the salinity was measured using the hand refractometer. The temperature of the seawater

    and its dissolved oxygen were measured using the K: meter.

    The seaweed samples were brought to the Marine iology Kepartment for identification. The

    identification of the species was based on their external morphology, color and shape. /ictures of the

    macroalgae aided the determination of species.

    +"+ Preparation of Specimens for nalyses

    The seaweed samples were cleaned with water and the epiphytes were removed. 8xcess water from

    the samples was then removed by gently pressing the algae against tissue paper.

    9ll the collected seaweed samples were sun dried. To determine relationship between calorific value

    and moisture content during sun5drying of seaweeds, one whole thallus of each species, Sargassum

    /age 8of (*

  • 8/13/2019 28046767 Calorific Values and Proximate Analysis Of

    7/13

    polycystum and Ulva reticulata, was sampled for moisture content and calorific values analyses at

    different intervals of time for three days. 9 total of seven samples were taken from the whole thallus of

    each species during the sun5drying period and each sample had three replicates.

    9fter all the seaweeds were sun5dried, they were stored and cut into small pieces for the proximate

    analyses and calorific value determination. The whole experiment was conducted in two trials, one

    month apart.

    +"- Pro&imate nalysis

    /roximate analysis is an indirect method of measuring the calorific value of a sample. It converts the

    component weights of proteins, fats and carbohydrates in the sample to their e4uivalent heating values.

    /roximate analysis re4uires the values of the ash content, moisture content, volatile combustible matter

    content, and the fixed carbon in order to determine the heating value of the sample. The /roximate

    analysis method used in this study was based on 97TM K*&+% 07tandard /ractice for /roximate 9nalysis

    of Coal and Coke1 but the temperatures were adBusted since proximate analysis of biomass is limited to

    @))C only 2.

    +"/ Calorific %alue Determination

    In adiabatic calorimetry, direct combustion of the samples is done in a temperature5controlled bomb.

    This Backet is maintained at the temperature of the bomb throughout the combustion process to eliminate

    the heat5leakage. The calorific value of the sample obtained from calorimetry is said to be more accurate

    than that obtained from proximate analysis 2&"3.

    The calorific value was determined using /arr &&)! :xygen omb Calorimeter based on I7:

    %!#$ 0Ketermination of gross calorific value by the bomb calorimetric method, and calculation of

    net calorific value1.

    *. Results and 9iscussion

    -")" Calorific %alues of Different Sea$eed Species from Different Places 'aribago, Cordova and

    uaya1

    9 preliminary run was done to investigate available seaweed species in Maribago, Cordova and

    uaya. Table * shows the seawater conditions when the seaweed samples were obtained.

    /age :of (*

  • 8/13/2019 28046767 Calorific Values and Proximate Analysis Of

    8/13

    &able *. Seawater conditions of samlin# locations

    Parameter 'aribago uaya Cordova

    T 0oC1 *).! *) *)

    K: 0g(ml1 +.&+ *.&" *.&%

    7alinity 0J1 %# %@ *@p? +.## !.*& !.*"

    In Maribago, the most abundant species were S" polycystumand U" reticulata" In Cordova, the most

    abundant specie was S" oligocystum" Figure & shows the calorific values of different seaweed species

    harvested.

    ;i#ure (. Calorific Values of 9ifferent Seaweed Secies from Mariba#o, Cordo

  • 8/13/2019 28046767 Calorific Values and Proximate Analysis Of

    9/13

    samples could not be determined by bomb calorimetry since no temperature change is observed during

    ignition.

    Figures % and * below show the relation between moisture content of the seaweed and its calorific

    value for Sargassum polycystumand Ulva reticulatasamples, respectively.

    In both figures, it can be clearly seen that at moisture content below ")J, the calorific values have

    negative linear correlations with moisture content consistently in the two experimental trials done.

    ?owever, Figure % shows that the two experimental trials produced different correlations despite

    involving the same species. :n the other hand, figure * shows that the two trials produced almost

    identical correlations. It is also seen that at moisture content &$J 0or below1, the calorific value of

    seaweeds is at par with those of the conventional biomass fuels. 7ince the two trials produced two

    different correlations, only correlation of Figure * is thus developed as

    284uation "3

    -"- Correlation bet$een the calorific values of sea$eeds and pro&imate analysis data

    9fter two to three days of sun5drying, the moisture content of the seaweeds lowered to &) to &$J by

    weight. 8ssentially all seaweed samples have negligible fixed carbon content 0N)J1 and have high

    volatile matter 0")5+$J1 and ash content 0&$5"$J1 on dry basis. The combustibles of a solid fuel are the

    volatile matter and the fixed carbon. 7ince the fixed carbon content is negligible, the volatile matter is the

    only contributor to the energy of seaweeds.

    /age =of (*

    ;i#ure *. Calorific Value of Ulva reticulata

  • 8/13/2019 28046767 Calorific Values and Proximate Analysis Of

    10/13

    9sh content is the remaining incombustible minerals of a fuel. Conse4uently, the calorific value

    decreases with increasing ash content. In general, fuels should have ash content less than $J 2#3. ut

    seaweeds in this study have been found to have high ash content which would then restrict the direct

    combustion of seaweeds as biofuels.

    Figure ", $ and @ are plots of calorific values against moisture contents, volatile matter contents, and

    ash contents, respectively, covering all the sampled species of Ulva and Sargassum. It can be seen in

    Figure " that the moisture content has a poor correlation with the calorific value, while volatile matter

    content and ash content each have good correlations with the calorific value 0-% ).+*# and -% ).+%*,

    respectively1.

    /age (>of (*

  • 8/13/2019 28046767 Calorific Values and Proximate Analysis Of

    11/13

    /age ((of (*

    ;i#ure 4. Calorific

  • 8/13/2019 28046767 Calorific Values and Proximate Analysis Of

    12/13

    y multiple linear regression analysis, moisture, volatile matter and ash contents were correlated with

    the calorific value. Constraints in the use of this correlation include &) to %)J moisture content, ") t)

    +$J volatile matter and &$ to "$J ash content.

    284uation $3

    To measure how well the correlation fits the data, coefficient of determination 0-%1 was computed.

    The -% computed was ).!). This means that !)J of the variation of the calorific values of the seaweed

    samples has been explained by the linear regression e4uation established here.

    3. Conclusion and Recommendation

    7eaweeds have high potential to be used as solid biofuel since it has comparable calorific values to the

    conventional biomass like bagasse, rice husks and corn cobs. ?owever, seaweeds had to be dried from

    about !+J to &$J moisture content in order to obtain calorific values close to those of the conventional

    biomass 0#))) &%))) k'(kg1. In the case of Ulva reticulata species, there was a highly negative

    correlation between moisture content and calorific values. :n the bigger picture, 84uation $ can be used

    to predict calorific values of Ulvaand Sargassumspecies.

    In the case of sun5drying of Sargassumspecies, more experiments should be conducted to establish aconsistent correlation between moisture contents and calorific values. To improve -%, more species of

    Sargassum should be included.

    4. References

    2&3 ?oi, . 0%))*1. /otential of biomass utili;ation for energy in asia pacific sharing of specific

    experience of /hilippine situation. Forest -easearch Institute. >epong, >uala umpur Malaysia.

    2%3 -asmussen, M. and et" al. %))+. /rimary iomass /roduction from Marine 9lgae. 6niversity of

    9arhus Gational 8nvironmental -esearch InstituteO Memorandum for E85net, %))+.2*3 Pokoyama, 7., 'onouchi, >., Imou, >. 0%))+1. 8nergy production from marine biomass fuel cell

    power generation driven by methane produced from seaweed. 2orld cademy" $ &&*&5&&$&.

    2"3 Chywoneth, K. 0%))%1. -eview of biomethane from marine biomass.3uel. &)&)%$5&)*)

    2$3 Pantovski, 8. 0%))!1. 7eaweed Ulva photosynthesis and ;ero emissions power generation.

    Proceedings of EC4S +005. * &&&+5&&*).

    /age (+of (*

    ;i#ure 8. Calorific

  • 8/13/2019 28046767 Calorific Values and Proximate Analysis Of

    13/13

    2@3 ruton, T., yons, ?., erat, P., 7tanley, M. 9nd -asmussen, M. 0%))@1. 9 review of the potential

    of marine algae as a source of biofuel in Ireland. Sustainable Energy reland"&*5%".

    2+3 Trono, =. 0#+1. Field guide and atlas of the seaweed resources of the /hilippines. ookmark, Inc.

    %@"59 /ablo :campo 7r. 9ve.

    2!3 ?ulsbergen, -. 0%))@1. /redicting Ulva growth in a saline Eolkelrak5Doomlake.Delft University of

    echnology report. !5.

    2#3 Quaak, /., >noef, ?., 7tassen, ?. 0##1. 8nergy from biomass 09 review of combustion and

    gasification techni4ues1. Gew Pork, 679. %5+.

    2&)3 eber, =. 9nd Dygarlicke, C. 0%))&1. arrier issues to the utili;ation of biomass. D Document

    Control, %+@$5++).

    2&&3 6nesco. 0!!1. 8ngineering schools and endogenous technology development. /aris.

    2&%3 amare, M. and ing, 7. 0%))&1. Calorific content of Gew Dealand marine macrophytes. 7e$

    8ealand 9ournal of 'arine and 3resh$ater :esearch" *$**$5*"&.

    2&*3 ittler, M., Murray, 7. 0++1. 9nalyses of pathways of energy flow. n ittler, M. and Murray, 7.

    08ds.1. Influence of domestic wastes on the structure and energetic of intertidal communities near

    ilson Cove, 7an Clemente Island. University of California, Davis! California 2ater. "+5$@.

    2&"3 Carefoot, T. 0!$1. Calorimetry. /ress 7yndicate of the 6niversity of Cambridge. In ?andbook of

    /hycological Methods Macroalgae. Gew Pork, 679""!)5"#)

    2&$3 /arikh, '., Channiwala, 7., and =osal, =. 0%))"1. 9 correlation of calculating ??E from proximate

    analysis of solid fuels. Fuel.&).&)&!

    2&@3 Kemirbas, 9. 0#@1. Calculation of higher heating values of iomass fuels. Fuel, &)&)&@5&)%)

    2&+3 7heng, C., and 9;evedo, '. 0%))"1. 8stimating the ??E of biomass fuels from basic analysis of data.

    Fuel. &).&)%).

    2&!3:rti;, 9., Trono, =. 0%)))1. =rowth and reproductive pattern of intertidal and subtidal Sargassum

    07argassaceae, Fucales1 population in olinao, /angasinan. Science Diliman"&%%"$5$).

    2 ?enrich, -., Eodegel, =., >ocB, M. 0%))"1. Kefinition of standard a biomass. -8G8. 0?enrich et"

    al, %))"1.

    2%)3 ?ennenberg, >., Fritsche, 6., ?errera, -., 0%))#1. 94uatic biomass sustainable bioenergy from

    algaeR :ko5Institut, Karmstadt, =ermany.

    /age (*of (*