26 the australian, ause01z01ma - v1 henderson has …€¦ · 26 the australian, tuesday, september...

1
26 THE AUSTRALIAN, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2015 theaustralian.com.au/wealth WEALTH AUSE01Z01MA - V1 If your Self-Managed Superannu- ation Fund receives superannu- ation contributions from non- related employers, your SMSF needs to receive these contribu- tions in the required electronic format. If you aren’t sure if your SMSF is “SuperStream” com- pliant, you need to read on. Nathan Burgess, ATO director SMSF Income Tax & Regulatory Risks, recently told me that of the 500,000 SMSFs in Australia, some 300,000 need to be Super- Stream compliant. Mr Burgess said about 5 per cent of SMSFs have not taken the correct steps necessary to comply with the SuperStream requirements. Under the new SuperStream system, a non-related employer must send superannuation contri- butions to an SMSF electronic- ally, using an electronic service address (ESA). This is an internet address created to enable Super- Stream messages to be received securely and it is different to an email address. However, in order for this to happen, an SMSF first needs to be registered with a messaging pro- vider to obtain an ESA. An SMSF cannot simply use an ESA that be- longs to another SMSF unless the SMSF is also registered with this same messaging provider. Once an SMSF is registered with a messaging provider, the messaging provider will link the SMSF to an ESA. Until this is done the employer cannot start sending SuperStream contributions elec- tronically to the SMSF via this ESA. Mr Burgess stressed that the ESA needs to be “active”. “If it is not active, the superannuation contributions submitted by the employer will be rejected. The em- ployer will also receive an error message. It is important that SMSFs check with the service pro- vider that provided the ESA to en- sure their ESA is active and is linked to their SMSF,” said Bur- gess. All SMSFs, even those that are a related party to an employer can benefit from SuperStream. On highlighting the advantages of Su- perStream, Mr Burgess said, “The SuperStream system ensures that employer contributions are paid in a consistent, timely and ef- ficient matter to members’ ac- counts. It provides a reliable flow of payments and information on contributions which SMSFs can use for their accounting and tax obligations. It also results in fewer data and payment errors due to the better integration of employ- ers’ payroll systems, as it allows employers to use a single distri- bution channel when dealing with multiple SMSFs.” SMSFs that receive contribu- tions from non-related employers should be ready for SuperStream now. Employers with more than 20 employees must be able to send SuperStream contributions to all super funds, including SMSFs, by October 31 2015. Small employers have until June 30 2016 to implement the SuperStream sys- tem though many of them have already commenced sending SuperStream contributions. Messaging providers are now offering free or low cost access to an ESA meaning all SMSFs can obtain the benefit of electronic processing. Details of messaging providers are available on the tax office’s website. After registering your SMSF with a messaging pro- vider they will provide an ESA, re- ceive employer contribution messages sent to your SMSF and send employer contributions messages to SMSFs. SMSF trustees must also en- sure that their employers receive the SMSF’s Australian Business Number, bank account details and ESA. If employers do not re- ceive this mandatory information, they may direct employees’ super- annuation contributions to their default superannuation fund in- stead of to the employees’ SMSFs. www.monicarule.com.au Monica Rule is an SMSF specialist and author. Why SMSFs should get their SuperStream right MONICA RULE Positioned to notch up its third consecutive year of decline, the US dollar price of gold is hovering more than 40 per cent below its 2011 high. The contraction has had a cataclysmic impact on the shares of goldmining companies, with popular indices such as the “HUI” more than 80 per cent lighter than their bull market peak. So how has the industry responded? Despite the price contractions, annual world goldmine output has continued to rise. After posting a sixth consecutive increase during 2014, output remains 20 per cent higher than pre-financial crisis levels when the prevailing gold price was $US900 an ounce. Hence, if the cure to gold’s current bear market is a supply response, the mining collective faces further work ahead. However, with equity prices in the sector already having suffered such massive declines, could the coming listing of Soon Mining provide a contrarian opportunity? The minerals exploration company is principally focused on Ghana, Africa’s second- largest gold-producing nation. Its principal asset is the Kwahu Gold Project, which covers 83sq km, incorporating a mining licence and certified mineral resources. The mining licence has a tenure extending until 2027, while the resource consists of an alluvial gold deposit in the order of 150,000 ounces, classified as indicated. Proceeds from Soon Mining’s float are scheduled to facilitate development of a small-scale mining and processing operation incorporating the existing resource. The planned 10-year operation has potential to generate in the order of 10,000 ounces per annum, with more scalable exploration targets within the licence likely to attract surplus cashflow. Principal risks surround the small-scale nature of Soon Mining’s development plan and present state of gold equities. Valuations in the industry are depressed and economics associated with development of the Kwahu alluvial deposit is uncertain. The long-dated nature of the company’s mining concession and presence of mineralisation are attractive qualities. However, execution risks associated with small-scale mining developments may challenge interest for the initial public offer. Tim Morris is an analyst at wise- owl.com. New gold venture faces up to risks TIM MORRIS FLOAT WATCH Soon Mining ASX CODE: SMG SHARES ON OFFER: 25 million LISTING PRICE: 20c MARKET CAPITALISATION: $30 million LISTING DATE: October 16 Salary sacrifice for retirement How you can save for retirement tax effectively without it impact- ing on your current income? If you’re a wage and salary earner then the answer is to con- sider using salary sacrifice. This involves you and your employer agreeing that some of your remuneration will be sent to your super fund by the employer and the remainder will be paid to you as salary. Let’s look at an example. Sup- pose this financial year you’ll be paid $100,000 in salary. Over the course of the year you would pay $26,947 in income tax and Medi- care Levy. Your after tax income is $73,053. There are some important as- sumptions in these numbers — you’re not eligible for any tax off- sets such as the Family Tax or Childcare Benefits and you also have private health insurance which means you don’t need to pay the Medicare levy surcharge. Also, you don’t have to pay any higher education or trade sup- port loan repayments. And final- ly you don’t earn any other income such as interest from bank deposits. Let’s assume that you salary sacrifice $10,000 into super which means your salary drops to $90,000. After paying income tax and the Medicare levy you’ll re- ceive $66,953 in income which is $6100 lower than if you took all your remuneration as salary. Salary-sacrifice contributions are deemed to be employer super contributions and are taxed at 15 per cent as opposed to your marginal rate which means these super contributions will have $1500 of tax deducted. Total tax paid is $24,547, which is $2400 lower than previously. Some people ask if you can structure your salary-sacrifice contributions so that your after- tax income remains at the pre- salary sacrifice level. The correct answer for some- one on $100,000 is that, every dollar of salary sacrifice super contributions will give them a lower overall tax outcome, and also lower-after tax income. Take our $10,000 salary sacri- fice example above. Under that scenario we will receive 8 per cent less income ($6100 as already mentioned) but our total tax bill has fallen by 9 per cent. These might seem like a small difference but if you’re struggling to work out how to save for retire- ment when money is tight then you have to use the various strands of the tax system to your advantage. Because of our progressive personal tax scales different re- sults arise for other income levels. Now before rushing off to enter into a salary sacrifice ar- rangement, there are some points that must also be considered. First, does your employer allow salary-sacrifice contribu- tions? If yes, will they pay their compulsory employer contribu- tions on your total remuneration or your revised salary amount? What remuneration will be used when working out your holiday pay loadings, overtime and other allowances? Do you have a bind- ing agreement with your em- ployer as to when these salary- sacrifice contributions will be made? Second, the Family Tax Ben- efit and Childcare Rebate and Benefit — these are subject to an income test but are effectively tax cuts. It may be that after you re- ceive all these benefits you actu- ally pay an average tax rate on your salary of less than 15 per cent, that is, the tax rate on em- ployer super contributions. If you receive any of these benefits you should work out your actual net tax position first before deciding if salary-sacrifice contributions actually work for you. Third, don’t forget about the concessional contribution caps. If you were aged at least 49 on June 30, 2015, then the maximum con- cessional contributions that can be made this financial year is $35,000. For everyone else the concessional contribution cap this financial year is $30,000. Or- dinarily you can make conces- sional contributions above this threshold but those excess con- tributions will be taxed at your marginal tax rate and possibly other penalties. And finally, you can only put in place a salary-sac- rifice agreement for income that you will earn, not income that you have already earned. Tony Negline is author of The Essential SMSF Guide 2015-16 published by Thomson Reuters. TONY NEGLINE What’s a good way forward for a resource fund when commodity prices are looking bleak all over? David Whitten, the veteran local manager who in 2012 found- ed what’s now the Henderson Global Natural Resources Fund, has a simple answer: in his world the phrase “natural resources” includes agriculture, and his fund is invested 37 or 38 per cent in agri- business, 28 per cent in energy and 33 per cent in mining. Which means that while the fund is down 7.9 per cent in the last 12 months, the annual average return since inception is a much more respectable 8.0 per cent compared with the relevant benchmark index, the S&P Global Natural Resources Accumulation Index, which has averaged 5.7 per cent over the same period. And much better, of course, than almost any conventional resour- ces fund. “It’s worth noting that we’re not hugging that index; indeed 75 per cent of our investments depart from that benchmark,’’ he says. Whitten said the Henderson Global Natural Resource Fund, which was called the 90 West fund when he founded it, was $36 mil- lion or $37m. “That commenced a bit over three years ago and is our flagship retail product” out of a total of $280m under management, he said, which includes one large mandate from a big unnamed manager, and a SICAV, similar to a UCITS structure, run out of Luxembourg on behalf of British- based Henderson Global. A SICAV, for the pedants, is a “societe d’investissement a capital variable” or a variable capital in- vestment company, usually classi- fied as an open-ended collective investment scheme. “It takes a while to get going but we’re on platforms and have been rated by various groups,” says Whitten. On June 1 this year Henderson fully took over the 90 West fund that he started, having previously been the major shareholder in the business, Whitten said. “That’s working out wonder- fully and we’ll have full integration by the end of this year”. He said that in July he added another team member, Kiwi re- sources analyst Tim Gerrard. “He’s in Toronto today talking agriculture … he’s broadening beyond mining.’’ Whitten says that not only is the fund a big holder of global agri- business companies but in the mining and energy markets “we aren’t just investing in the traditional upstream businesses but going into the mid market in transport and distribution”. A bit like the merchants who sold shovels to the gold prospec- tors, he sees nothing bizarre about buying into pipelines and other business whose revenue streams are less dependent than upstream producers on commodity prices. “The low gas price has been fantastic in North America for the pipeline companies.’’ He’s not scared of lower commodity prices either, about which he remains very cautious, noting that “that’s what we need, for the higher-cost producers of commodities to be in a bit of strife, for that reason.’’ He says there’s a big negative coming shortly in the US, in that oil companies are allowed to value their reserves at last year’s prices, “and I can guarantee that oil’s not now worth $U90 a barrel.’’ Or put another way, next year’s reports from US shale extractors will have to be a lot more honest about the value of their reserves. That said, he adds that improvements in drilling techno- logy mean that some companies will be making more money with the oil price at current levels than they were when it was $US90. But where he gets seriously animated is in discussing the massive potential of the agri- business sector, most particularly that recent scientific discoveries about genome separation and gene splicing should revolutionise crop yields and reduce weed spraying. “We’re not talking GM here: we’re talking major advances in crop production and at the same time, northern hemisphere agri- business has discovered the huge benefits it can gain from the differ- ent seasons in the southern hemi- sphere.’’ He is one of many who don’t see much immediate upside in Australian agricultural organis- ations because of their lack of scale and lack of technology, although his fund has positions in Grain- corp and its likely US-based bidder, Archer Daniels Midland, on the basis that he very much likes the quality of the ADM man- agement. And he says there’s been a revolution in US eating habits that simply hasn’t been recognised outside that country. “It used to be they provided doughnuts for morning tea, and now it’s carrot sticks.’’ Maybe that doesn’t sound the death knell for fast food, but it’s a strong trend, he says. Aside from his enthusiasm for ag stocks, there’s another huge positive in including such stocks in a natural resources fund: it redu- ces volatility. “Since inception, the fund’s volatility has been 10.3 per cent, just below its benchmark index’s volatility of 10.6 per cent’. “By comparison, a traditional mining investment fund would have almost twice as much vola- tility at around 20 per cent.’’ Henderson has natural flair for returns ANDREW MAIN DAN HIMBRECHTS Local CEO Rob Adams and David Whitten of Henderson Global Investors. The fund’s average return is 8pc Returns since inception Source: Henderson Global Investors, Bloomberg % 0 -10 -20 -30 10 20 30 40 50 15 14 13 2012 Absolute and relative to S&P Global Natural Resources Index (in $A) As at August 31, 2015 SPGNRUT ($A) – TOTAL SINCE INCEPTION HENDERSON GLOBAL NATURAL RESOURCES – TOTAL SINCE INCEPTION S&P/ASX 200 RESOURCES INDEX (ACCUM) FUND +27.7% BENCHMARK +19.1% ASX 200 RES -16.6% VALUE ADD +8.6% Edited by James Kirby Powered by Learn to Trade Pty Ltd (ACN:138178542, AFSL:339557) provides general information and educational content only. This is not personal advice and no individual needs or circumstances have been considered, nor is this an offer to buy/sell financial products. Financial products are complex and entail risk of loss. You should always obtain professional advice to ensure trading or investing in such products is suitable for your circumstances. Ensure you obtain, read and understand any applicable offer document. 1800 720 964 www.learntotrade.com.au Foreign Ex Trade currencies, anytime, anywhere. Explore the world of Forex Trading with a Global Award Winning Educator and start your journey towards financial freedom TODAY! At our exclusive Workshop you will learn: Four powerful trading strategies developed by Greg Secker himself Essential skills needed to make money in both rising and falling markets Risk management techniques used by professional traders How to create a solid income from Forex Trading Workshop Register for our FREE Workshop Developed by Millionaire FX trader Greg Secker Crowne Plaza Thursday 1 st October at 12pm & 6pm Panther’s World of Entertainment Tuesday 6 th October at 12pm & 6.30pm Holiday Inn Wednesday 7 th October at 6.30pm

Upload: ngotuyen

Post on 19-Jul-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

26 THE AUSTRALIAN, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2015theaustralian.com.au/wealth WEALTH

AUSE01Z01MA - V1

If your Self-Managed Superannu-ation Fund receives superannu-ation contributions from non-related employers, your SMSFneeds to receive these contribu-tions in the required electronicformat. If you aren’t sure if yourSMSF is “SuperStream” com-pliant, you need to read on.

Nathan Burgess, ATO directorSMSF Income Tax & RegulatoryRisks, recently told me that of the500,000 SMSFs in Australia,some 300,000 need to be Super-Stream compliant. Mr Burgesssaid about 5 per cent of SMSFshave not taken the correct stepsnecessary to comply with theSuperStream requirements.

Under the new SuperStreamsystem, a non-related employer

must send superannuation contri-butions to an SMSF electronic-ally, using an electronic serviceaddress (ESA). This is an internetaddress created to enable Super-Stream messages to be receivedsecurely and it is different to anemail address.

However, in order for this tohappen, an SMSF first needs to beregistered with a messaging pro-vider to obtain an ESA. An SMSFcannot simply use an ESA that be-longs to another SMSF unless theSMSF is also registered with thissame messaging provider.

Once an SMSF is registeredwith a messaging provider, themessaging provider will link theSMSF to an ESA. Until this is donethe employer cannot start sendingSuperStream contributions elec-tronically to the SMSF via thisESA. Mr Burgess stressed that theESA needs to be “active”. “If it isnot active, the superannuationcontributions submitted by theemployer will be rejected. The em-ployer will also receive an errormessage. It is important thatSMSFs check with the service pro-vider that provided the ESA to en-

sure their ESA is active and islinked to their SMSF,” said Bur-gess.

All SMSFs, even those that area related party to an employer canbenefit from SuperStream. Onhighlighting the advantages of Su-perStream, Mr Burgess said, “TheSuperStream system ensures thatemployer contributions are paidin a consistent, timely and ef-ficient matter to members’ ac-counts. It provides a reliable flowof payments and information oncontributions which SMSFs canuse for their accounting and taxobligations. It also results in fewerdata and payment errors due tothe better integration of employ-ers’ payroll systems, as it allowsemployers to use a single distri-bution channel when dealing withmultiple SMSFs.”

SMSFs that receive contribu-tions from non-related employersshould be ready for SuperStreamnow. Employers with more than20 employees must be able to sendSuperStream contributions to allsuper funds, including SMSFs, byOctober 31 2015. Small employershave until June 30 2016 to

implement the SuperStream sys-tem though many of them havealready commenced sendingSuperStream contributions.

Messaging providers are nowoffering free or low cost access toan ESA meaning all SMSFs canobtain the benefit of electronicprocessing. Details of messagingproviders are available on the taxoffice’s website. After registeringyour SMSF with a messaging pro-vider they will provide an ESA, re-ceive employer contributionmessages sent to your SMSF andsend employer contributionsmessages to SMSFs.

SMSF trustees must also en-sure that their employers receivethe SMSF’s Australian BusinessNumber, bank account detailsand ESA. If employers do not re-ceive this mandatory information,they may direct employees’ super-annuation contributions to theirdefault superannuation fund in-stead of to the employees’ SMSFs.

www.monicarule.com.au

Monica Rule is an SMSF specialist and author.

Why SMSFs should get their SuperStream right MONICA RULE

Positioned to notch up its third consecutive year of decline, the US dollar price of gold is hovering more than 40 per cent below its 2011 high. The contraction has had a cataclysmic impact on the shares of goldmining companies, with popular indices such as the “HUI” more than 80 per cent lighter than their bull market peak. So how has the industry responded?

Despite the price contractions, annual world goldmine output has continued to rise. After posting a sixth consecutive increase during 2014, output remains 20 per cent higher than pre-financial crisis levels when the prevailing gold price was $US900 an ounce. Hence, if the cure to gold’s current bear market is a supply response, the mining collective faces further work ahead. However, with equity prices in the sector already having suffered such massive declines, could the coming listing of Soon Mining provide a contrarian opportunity?

The minerals exploration company is principally focused on Ghana, Africa’s second-largest gold-producing nation. Its principal asset is the Kwahu Gold Project, which covers 83sq km, incorporating a mining licence and certified mineral resources. The mining licence has a tenure extending until 2027, while the resource consists of an alluvial gold deposit in the order of 150,000 ounces, classified as indicated.

Proceeds from Soon Mining’s float are scheduled to facilitate development of a small-scale mining and processing operation incorporating the existing resource. The planned 10-year operation has potential to generate in the order of 10,000 ounces per annum, with more scalable exploration targets within the licence likely to attract surplus cashflow.

Principal risks surround thesmall-scale nature of Soon Mining’s development plan and present state of gold equities. Valuations in the industry are depressed and economics associated with development of the Kwahu alluvial deposit is uncertain.

The long-dated nature of thecompany’s mining concession and presence of mineralisation are attractive qualities. However, execution risks associated with small-scale mining developments may challenge interest for the initial public offer.

Tim Morris is an analyst at wise-owl.com.

New goldventure faces up to risks

TIM MORRIS

FLOATWATCH

Soon Mining ASX CODE: SMGSHARES ON OFFER: 25 millionLISTING PRICE: 20cMARKET CAPITALISATION: $30 millionLISTING DATE: October 16

Salary sacrifice for retirement

How you can save for retirementtax effectively without it impact-ing on your current income?

If you’re a wage and salaryearner then the answer is to con-sider using salary sacrifice.

This involves you and youremployer agreeing that some ofyour remuneration will be sent toyour super fund by the employerand the remainder will be paid toyou as salary.

Let’s look at an example. Sup-pose this financial year you’ll bepaid $100,000 in salary. Over thecourse of the year you would pay$26,947 in income tax and Medi-care Levy. Your after tax incomeis $73,053.

There are some important as-sumptions in these numbers —you’re not eligible for any tax off-sets such as the Family Tax orChildcare Benefits and you alsohave private health insurancewhich means you don’t need topay the Medicare levy surcharge.Also, you don’t have to pay anyhigher education or trade sup-port loan repayments. And final-ly you don’t earn any otherincome such as interest frombank deposits.

Let’s assume that you salarysacrifice $10,000 into superwhich means your salary drops to$90,000. After paying income tax

and the Medicare levy you’ll re-ceive $66,953 in income which is$6100 lower than if you took allyour remuneration as salary.

Salary-sacrifice contributionsare deemed to be employer supercontributions and are taxed at15 per cent as opposed to yourmarginal rate which means thesesuper contributions will have$1500 of tax deducted. Total taxpaid is $24,547, which is $2400lower than previously.

Some people ask if you canstructure your salary-sacrificecontributions so that your after-tax income remains at the pre-salary sacrifice level.

The correct answer for some-one on $100,000 is that, everydollar of salary sacrifice supercontributions will give them alower overall tax outcome, andalso lower-after tax income.

Take our $10,000 salary sacri-fice example above. Under thatscenario we will receive 8 per centless income ($6100 as alreadymentioned) but our total tax billhas fallen by 9 per cent.

These might seem like a smalldifference but if you’re strugglingto work out how to save for retire-ment when money is tight thenyou have to use the variousstrands of the tax system to youradvantage.

Because of our progressivepersonal tax scales different re-sults arise for other income levels.

Now before rushing off toenter into a salary sacrifice ar-rangement, there are some pointsthat must also be considered.

First, does your employerallow salary-sacrifice contribu-tions? If yes, will they pay theircompulsory employer contribu-

tions on your total remunerationor your revised salary amount?What remuneration will be usedwhen working out your holidaypay loadings, overtime and otherallowances? Do you have a bind-ing agreement with your em-ployer as to when these salary-sacrifice contributions will bemade?

Second, the Family Tax Ben-efit and Childcare Rebate andBenefit — these are subject to anincome test but are effectively taxcuts. It may be that after you re-ceive all these benefits you actu-ally pay an average tax rate onyour salary of less than 15 percent, that is, the tax rate on em-ployer super contributions. If youreceive any of these benefits youshould work out your actual nettax position first before decidingif salary-sacrifice contributionsactually work for you.

Third, don’t forget about theconcessional contribution caps. Ifyou were aged at least 49 on June30, 2015, then the maximum con-cessional contributions that canbe made this financial year is$35,000. For everyone else theconcessional contribution capthis financial year is $30,000. Or-dinarily you can make conces-sional contributions above thisthreshold but those excess con-tributions will be taxed at yourmarginal tax rate and possiblyother penalties. And finally, youcan only put in place a salary-sac-rifice agreement for income thatyou will earn, not income thatyou have already earned.

Tony Negline is author of The Essential SMSF Guide 2015-16 published by Thomson Reuters.

TONY NEGLINE

What’s a good way forward for aresource fund when commodityprices are looking bleak all over?

David Whitten, the veteranlocal manager who in 2012 found-ed what’s now the HendersonGlobal Natural Resources Fund,has a simple answer: in his worldthe phrase “natural resources”includes agriculture, and his fundis invested 37 or 38 per cent in agri-business, 28 per cent in energy and33 per cent in mining.

Which means that while thefund is down 7.9 per cent in the last12 months, the annual averagereturn since inception is a muchmore respectable 8.0 per centcompared with the relevantbenchmark index, the S&P GlobalNatural Resources AccumulationIndex, which has averaged 5.7 percent over the same period. Andmuch better, of course, thanalmost any conventional resour-ces fund.

“It’s worth noting that we’renot hugging that index; indeed 75per cent of our investments departfrom that benchmark,’’ he says.

Whitten said the HendersonGlobal Natural Resource Fund,which was called the 90 West fundwhen he founded it, was $36 mil-lion or $37m.

“That commenced a bit overthree years ago and is our flagship

retail product” out of a total of$280m under management, hesaid, which includes one largemandate from a big unnamedmanager, and a SICAV, similar toa UCITS structure, run out ofLuxembourg on behalf of British-based Henderson Global.

A SICAV, for the pedants, is a“societe d’investissement a capitalvariable” or a variable capital in-vestment company, usually classi-fied as an open-ended collectiveinvestment scheme.

“It takes a while to get going but

we’re on platforms and have beenrated by various groups,” saysWhitten.

On June 1 this year Hendersonfully took over the 90 West fundthat he started, having previouslybeen the major shareholder in thebusiness, Whitten said.

“That’s working out wonder-fully and we’ll have full integrationby the end of this year”.

He said that in July he addedanother team member, Kiwi re-sources analyst Tim Gerrard.

“He’s in Toronto today talking

agriculture … he’s broadeningbeyond mining.’’

Whitten says that not only isthe fund a big holder of global agri-business companies but in themining and energy markets “wearen’t just investing in thetraditional upstream businessesbut going into the mid market intransport and distribution”.

A bit like the merchants whosold shovels to the gold prospec-tors, he sees nothing bizarre aboutbuying into pipelines and otherbusiness whose revenue streams

are less dependent than upstreamproducers on commodity prices.

“The low gas price has beenfantastic in North America for thepipeline companies.’’

He’s not scared of lowercommodity prices either, aboutwhich he remains very cautious,noting that “that’s what we need,for the higher-cost producers ofcommodities to be in a bit of strife,for that reason.’’

He says there’s a big negativecoming shortly in the US, in thatoil companies are allowed to value

their reserves at last year’s prices,“and I can guarantee that oil’s notnow worth $U90 a barrel.’’

Or put another way, next year’sreports from US shale extractorswill have to be a lot more honestabout the value of their reserves.

That said, he adds thatimprovements in drilling techno-logy mean that some companieswill be making more money withthe oil price at current levels thanthey were when it was $US90.

But where he gets seriouslyanimated is in discussing themassive potential of the agri-business sector, most particularlythat recent scientific discoveriesabout genome separation andgene splicing should revolutionisecrop yields and reduce weedspraying.

“We’re not talking GM here:we’re talking major advances incrop production and at the sametime, northern hemisphere agri-business has discovered the hugebenefits it can gain from the differ-ent seasons in the southern hemi-sphere.’’

He is one of many who don’tsee much immediate upside in

Australian agricultural organis-ations because of their lack of scaleand lack of technology, althoughhis fund has positions in Grain-corp and its likely US-basedbidder, Archer Daniels Midland,on the basis that he very muchlikes the quality of the ADM man-agement.

And he says there’s been arevolution in US eating habits thatsimply hasn’t been recognisedoutside that country.

“It used to be they provideddoughnuts for morning tea, andnow it’s carrot sticks.’’

Maybe that doesn’t sound thedeath knell for fast food, but it’s astrong trend, he says.

Aside from his enthusiasm forag stocks, there’s another hugepositive in including such stocks ina natural resources fund: it redu-ces volatility.

“Since inception, the fund’svolatility has been 10.3 per cent,just below its benchmark index’svolatility of 10.6 per cent’.

“By comparison, a traditionalmining investment fund wouldhave almost twice as much vola-tility at around 20 per cent.’’

Henderson has natural flair for returnsANDREW MAIN

DAN HIMBRECHTS

Local CEO Rob Adams and David Whitten of Henderson Global Investors. The fund’s average return is 8pc

Returns since inception

Source: Henderson Global Investors, Bloomberg

%

0

-10

-20

-30

10

20

30

40

50

1514132012

Absolute and relative to S&P Global Natural Resources Index (in $A)

As at August 31, 2015

SPGNRUT ($A) – TOTAL SINCE INCEPTIONHENDERSON GLOBAL NATURAL RESOURCES – TOTAL SINCE INCEPTIONS&P/ASX 200 RESOURCES INDEX (ACCUM)

FUND+27.7%

BENCHMARK+19.1%

ASX 200 RES-16.6%

VALUE ADD+8.6%

Edited by James Kirby

Powered by

Learn to Trade Pty Ltd (ACN:138178542, AFSL:339557) provides general information and educational content only. This is not personal advice and no individual needs or circumstances have been considered, nor is this an offer to buy/sell fi nancial products. Financial products are complex and entail risk of loss. You should always obtain professional advice to ensure trading or investing in such products is suitable for your circumstances. Ensure you obtain, read and understand any applicable offer document.

1800 720 964www.learntotrade.com.au

Foreign Ex

Trade currencies, anytime, anywhere.Explore the world of Forex Trading with a Global Award Winning Educator and start your journey towards financial freedom TODAY!

At our exclusive Workshop you will learn:

Four powerful trading strategies developed by Greg Secker himself

Essential skills needed to make money in both rising and falling markets

Risk management techniques used by professional traders

How to create a solid income from Forex Trading

Workshop

Register for our FREE Workshop

Developed by Millionaire FX trader Greg Secker

Crowne Plaza Thursday 1st October at 12pm & 6pm

Panther’s World of Entertainment Tuesday 6th October at 12pm & 6.30pm

Holiday Inn Wednesday 7th October at 6.30pm